This document discusses management considerations for pregnancies following previous caesarean sections. It finds that pregnancies after a previous classical/hysterotomy scar carry a higher risk of uterine rupture compared to those with a previous lower segment transverse scar. For classical scars, an elective repeat caesarean is recommended at 38 weeks. Those with a previous lower segment scar can attempt a vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) if certain criteria are met, like a prior nonrecurring indication and adequate monitoring resources. Strict monitoring during labour is needed for all previous scar pregnancies to detect any signs of scar rupture.
3. Effects On Pregnancy And
Labour
Increases risk of
Abortion
Preterm labour
Pregnancy ailments
Operative interference
Placenta praevia
Adherent placenta
Post partum hemorrhage
Peripartum hysterectomy
4. Effects On The Scar
Increased risk of scar rupture
More risk in classical/hysterotomy scar than lower
segment scar
Lower segment scar rupture during labour
Classical/ hysterotomy scar ruptures during late
pregnancy and labour
Impairment of healing can cause early scar
rupture
5. Lower SEGMENT VS CLASSICAL/
HYSTEROTOMY SCAR
Lower Segment Classial /Hysterotomy
Apposition Perfect, no pockets of
blood
Difficult to appose
State of uterus during
healing
The part of uterus
remains inert
The part contracts and
retracts
Stretching effect Along the line of scar At right angles to scar
Placental implantation Attachment on scar
unlikely
Placenta more likely to
implant on scar
Net effect Sound scar Weak scar
Chances of rupture 0.2 - 1.5% 4 - 9%
Mortality following
rupture
Maternal and perinatal
death less
more
6.
7. INTEGRITY OF THE SCAR
CLASSICAL SCAR : The scar is weak. The scar
is more likely to give way during pregnancy with
increased risk to the mother and fetus. These
cases should be delivered by LSCS
LOWER SEGEMENT TRANSVERSE SCAR:
Usually heals better. During the course of labour
the integrity of the scar need to be assessed.
High index of suspicion is essential. Factor that
are to be considered while assessing scar are:
evidences of Scar Dehiscence during labour.
8. Previous operative notes
Indication of caesarean section: (a) Placenta
praevia – (i) imperfect apposition due to quick
surgery and (ii) thrombosis of the placental
sinuses. (b) Following prolonged labour-increased
chance of sepsis.
Technical difficulty in the primary operation
leading to tears to involve the branches of uterine
vessels.
9. •Hysterography in interconceptional period:
Hysterography, 6 months after the
operation, may reveal defect on the scar
Pregnancy:
(1) Pregnancy occurring soon after
operation
(2)Pregnancy complication
(3)h/o previous vaginal delivery following
LSCS
(4)Placenta praevia in present pregnancy
10. Evidence of scar rupture during
labour
Abnormal CTG- most consistent finding
Suprapubic pain
Shoulder tip pain or chest pain or sudden
onset of shortness of breath
Acute onset of scar tenderness
Abnormal vaginal bleeding or haematuria
Cessation of uterine contractions which were
previously adequate
Maternal shock
Loss of station of presenting part
11. PROGNOSIS
Previous history of classical LSCS or
hysterotomy makes the women vulnerable
for uterine rupture.this can increase the
maternal mortality to 5% and perinatal
mortality to 75%
12.
13. INVESTIGATIONS AND ASSESSMENT
Mandatory regular antenatal checkup
History of pain or tenderness over scar or any h/o vaginal bleeding
ULTRASOUND :
1) To assess integrity of the scar.
(Myometrial thickness>3.5mm NORMAL/low risk of uterine
rupture
2) To assess placental location
(absence of sub placental zone adherent placenta)
- Doppler and MRI may be done for confirmation
14. ADMISSION AT
38 WEEKS
ADMISSION AT
36 WEEKSELECTIVE
HOSPITALIZATION
LOWER
SEGMENT
TRANSVERSE
SCAR
ELECTIVE
C.S.
VAGINAL
DELIVERY
CLASSICAL/
HYSTERECTOM
Y SCAR
ELECTIVE
C.S. AT 38
WEEKS
CASE
ASSESSMENT
FORMULATION
OF METHOD OF
DELIVERY
16. MANAGEMENT FOLLOWING A:
PREVIOUS CLASSICAL CESAREAN SECTION : elective repeat section
as soon as the pregnancy reaches 38 weeks.
PREVIOUS LSCS
Mandatory hospital delivery and individualization of the case
Overall assessment is made with due consideration to:
indication of primary cesarean section
integrity of the scar
associated obstetric complications
number of previous cesarean sections
estimated weight of the baby