4. Methodology: Overall
● iTracks
o Online 4-day focus group
o Login daily
● Recruitment
o In theory vs. reality
o Limited demographics, not invested in subject
5. Methodology: Overall
● Interactive options:
o projective (picture to emotions)
o poll
o website
o search for a e-book
● Daily moderating and probing
● Correspondence
6. Methodology: Day by Day
1
Ice breaker, learn about reading habits and attitude
towards e-readers
2 Feedback, borrowed e-books, interest in tutorials
3 Feedback, impression of website, ad development
4
Poll on ad campaign, media options, usability of
website, prediction of impact
7. Day 1
● Warm-up: Describe reading habits and
opinions towards reading
● Photo projection technique
8. Day 2
1. Reactions from Day 1
o Convenience, mixed feelings
2. User borrowing experience
o Low
3. Tutorials
o Online “With e-readers, I always carry hundreds of
books and I can read whenever I want”
9. Day 3
1. Reactions from Day 2
o Preconception
o Relevance
2. Website design
o Well-received
3. Ad: what words come to mind
“I haven't downloaded an
e-book but I sure hope it is
easy. if it isn't easy I will
be borrowing books.”
10. Day 4
1. Advertising poll
2. Search and Find activity
> easy → hardy → hard
3. Most effective advertising option
> “signage in the Library”
>“e-mail newsletter”
> suggested new advertising options
4. Impact of e-book program
13. Observations
● What did I learn?
o Moderating is challenging
o Not an inspiring topic
● If it were a “real life” project?
o Instant notification, chat
o Bias to tech-savvy topics
o Add quantitative phase
Editor's Notes
VIDEOs for App
Fiona Shaw performing TS Elliot’s The Wasteland App (This is an example of mixing narratives from the past with technologies of the future)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPB_17rbNXk
htt
ps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlhosnfP-Jw
KRISTA
-a 2015 provincial grant to upgrade e-holding/services
-advertising campaign solution
The head librarian has learned that the city will receive a one-time grant in 2015 from the province to help upgrade the electronic holdings or services of the library system in whatever manner the library board sees fit. The local Member of Provincial Parliament has stated the city needs to “plan for the future” while still meeting the “needs of today” of its residents. There is a meeting of the library board in a few months to discuss the matter, and the head librarian will be asked to give an update on possible plans for acquiring more e-books and/or e-readers
-
KRISTA
Interest in e-readers and e-books?
How many people have used or would use e-readers?
3. Barriers to use?
4.Ways to advertise borrowing e-books?
How do adult residents feel about borrowing e-books from the library? What barriers prevent people from borrowing e-books? How would they react to the idea of trying out an e-reader, either in the library or on loan? What issues would that raise? How would this impact the image of the library as being able to meet the electronic needs of residents?
Familiarity
Familiarity with e-books
Familiarity with how to borrow
Technical support / digital help/ live chat?
Feelings
Feelings towards the library’s e-book lending system
Barriers to its use
Convenience of e-readers?
Feedback on Advertisement
How to advertise the e-book program
Comments on proposed advertisement (we need to find one or create one)
-KEELY Research was conducted on iTracks
Online focus group, answer questions
Participants can login daily at their convenience
Recruitment
In theory: from our online panel database
In reality: classmates, family, friends
Limited demographics, not invested in subject
What approach did you take and why?
- Did you include any specific moderating techniques?
- Who were the respondents and how were they recruited?
- Are there any limitations due to the methodology?
KEELY
KEELY
COLLEEN
COLLEEN
People’s reactions to summary of day 1’s comments
Both hardcopy and e-book users expressed that they understood the convenience of using ebook.
e-reader user theme - convenience, paper saving, good for travelling, access of many book from one place
respondents who preferred hardcopy expressed that they liked the physical aspect of holding a book. Another
Experience with borrowing from a library:
Most people in discussion have not had experience borrowing from the library
Reading a variety of e-materials
Some of those who have borrowing before, indicated difficulties
Quotation:
“ i feel i am top of the world when i download the e-book.”
Borrowing Experience:
Positive experiences:
Negative:
They’ve had bad experiences (technology failure, cannot find books looking for --
Reasons they borrowed:
They did not own an e-reader
they did not own a device
Conclusions for Day 2:
Day 2’s respondents preferred e-books for convenience, ease, limitless libraries.
Most tutorials are
Tutorials:
Most respondents agree on offering an online option.
NANCY
MAHENDAR
Range of outcomes: easy → hard
MADDIE
MADDIE
SYNCHRONOUS FG FOR A RACE TO THE FINDING E-BOOK on the Website
In-person focus groups for