1. This document appears to be a student's final assignment comparing the theories of Piaget and Vygotsky. 2. It includes sections on theory hunting, comparing Piaget and Vygotsky, examples applying their theories to driving in nails and shooting a basketball, and a concluding question section. 3. The assignment compares the key aspects of Piaget and Vygotsky's theories, including their differing views on egocentric versus social speech, the role of social context, and whether development precedes or follows learning.

1. FINAL ASSIGNMENT
이제는 헌내기조
1346006
1346018
1346025
1346027
KIM HEEYOUNG
YOO HEEKYUNG
LEE JUNGWON
LEE HYUNHEE

2. Comparative Organizer
<Theory Hunting>
Piaget vs Vygotsky
Design Plan
아빠어디가
Piaget “assimilation & accommodation”
Vygotsky“ZPD”
2/11

3. <Theory Hunting>
Parody <마녀사냥>“고것이 알고싶다”
Compare Piaget and Vygotsky
3/11

4. Piaget vs Vygotsky
Piaget
Vygotsky
Egocentric speech
Social speech
Not consider social
context
Consider social
context
Development
precede learning
Learning precede
development
Learners construct knowledge by themselves
4/11

5. <아빠어디가>
#1 How to drive in nails
Piaget / assimilation
& accommodation
#2 How to shoot a basket
Vygotsky / ZPD
5/11

6. #1 Piaget – Assimilation&Accommodation
Toy hammer
1
Real hammer
2
6/11

7. #1 Piaget – Assimilation&Accommodation
Original way
Fail
3
New way
Succeed
4
7/11

8. #2 Vygotsky - ZPD
2 point shot
= Actual development level
1
Help shooting = Scaffolding
2
8/11

9. #2 Vygotsky - ZPD
3
Let Hoo try himself
= Fading scaffolding
3 point shot
= Potential development level
4
9/11

10. ANY QUESTIONS?
10/11

11. THANK YOU