Postmodernism Essay

The Impact Of Postmodernism
Postmodernism was a reaction against the modernism philosophical values and assumptions.
Although many agree that there is a thin line between modernism and postmodernism,
postmodernism is not modernism. In modernism, scientific theories were used to determine what is
true. However, postmodernism allows individuals to question the theories and not take them as facts
(Duignan, 2014). While modernism emphasized on objectivism, postmodernism allows extensive
subjectivism in all aspects of life.
The main features of a postmodernist are that he or she is overly subjective, sensitive towards the
role of ideology in assertion and maintenance of political and economic power. On the other hand, a
modernist for example, there exists objective natural reality which is independent of human beings,
their practices and relationships (Duignan, 2014). Such realities...show more content...
In reaction, it furthered inclusion, freedom, and cooperation in the society. Although it lacks clear
doctrine, the distinction noticeable between the 1860s to 1950s and 1950s to date is clear evidence
that there was and still there is such movement as postmodernism. Postmodernists qualify their
theoretical position as advocating for inclusivity and democracy in the society because of their
keenness to recognize unjust enlightenment and challenging it with equally valid perspectives.
References
Duignan, B. (2014, May 14). Postmodernism philosophy. Retrieved January 27, 2018, from
www.britannica.com/topic/postmodernism–philosophy
Jenkins, S. (2018). Postmodern Art Definition Overview and Analysis. Retrieved January 27, 2018,
from http://www.theartstory.org/definition–postmodernism.htm
Lyotard, J. (2001). Answering the Question: What is Postmodernism? Postmodern Debates, 53–62.
doi:10.1057/978–1–137–04505–8_5
Sim, S. (2012). Routledge Companion to Postmodernism. Florence: Taylor and
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The Pros And Cons Of Postmodernism
Postmodernism is a loose–umbrella term that is used to describe a myriad of ideologies which
originated after the modern era. It is that complex whole of perspectives which reject the core
principles of modern( and enlightenment) thought. It stretches its ideological framework into
various fields of knowledge which include–but are not limited to–Science, Economics, Politics, and
Philosophy. The central claim ofPostmodernism is that there is no one over–raiding metanarrative. In
other words, there is no such thing as an absolute truth, nor is there such a thing as objectivity. Thus,
reality becomes a matrix of perception which changes based on the interpretation upon which it was
forged. Hence, Jean–Francois Lyotard– a French philosopher–defined...show more content...
Postmodernists argue that because modern science was developed by a group of people which were
ensconced in a European culture, they carried their subjective biases and prejudices into the
scientific inquiry. By this logic, science does not seem like an objective method through which to
investigate the world, but rather an enterprise that serve to adhere to a particular socio–political
agenda. To elaborate, they believe that science, in its contemporary state, does not produce objective
facts, but rather it offers a limited manner through which to cultivate the world. Specifically, a
white–masculine–elite view of the world. This means that new types of epistemologies–such as the
feminist epistemology–should be introduced to paint the full picture of reality. Thus, science seems
to offer a one–dimensional narrative that needs the perspectives of so–called marginalized,
oppressed groups to be complete. This line of reasoning is intrinsically flawed for a multitude of
reasons. First

post modernism Essay examples
Post – Modernism and Mass Culture
1
P M rnism and M C ost ode ass ulture
Post Modernism/20/1/98/P.Covington/Media Disc
This is a relatively new development and there are few sources that present clear and readable
accounts of it. It is a reaction to the belief of postmodernists that Marx concentrated excessively on
production, at the cost of consumption.
Introduction
This concept, despite its variety of meanings and definitions, is used to refer to many aspects of
social life from musical forms and styles, literature and fine art through to philosophy, history and
especially the mass media. Post modernism is a slippery term that is used by writers to refer to
several different things. Featherstone (1991) points out the...show more content...
We have become disillusioned and no longer expect the world to become a better place.
Metranarratives have partly been discredited because, in an era of global media in which we learn
more and more about other peoples' beliefs and lifestyles, it becomes less and less possible to regard
one lifestyle or one belief system as the 'true one'.
Dominic Strinati
Strinati suggests that, post–modern TV and film become preoccupied merely with surface style and
imagery, rather than deeper underlying themes, which might relate to the 'realities' of the human
condition. Action blockbuster movies dwell on special effects, rather than strong plots and TV
drama departs from realist plots of the 1960's (which attempted to look at serious issues such as
homelessness, Cathy Come Home and embraces a surreal world in which 'reality' is often
confused; For example, Twin Peaks, or more recently The X Files and American Gothic. Kaplan
(1987) identified pop and rock videos as perfect examples of post modernist culture because they
abandon all notion of narrative structure – there is no attempt to 'tell a story', rather the power of the
rock video lies purely in the collage of images mixed with music.
What is Post

An Overview of Postmodernism Essay
The political climate at the beginning of the 1940's and the changes taking place all around the
world drastically influenced the face of contemporary society. The invasion of Poland by
Germany on 1st of September 1939 was the first stone thrown in the face of freedom of
expression and liberty out of the many that followed for the next decades. The dawn of the Second
World War was one of the premises that forced many European artists, pioneers par excellence in
their field, through their French or German inherited status, to immigrate across the ocean. Due to
the exile, the art centre also moved overseas, from Paris to New York, offering a new opportunity
for American art to be the initiator in what was generally accepted as the new...show more content...
This description is trying to clearly position postmodernism in a specific time frame and outline its
main characteristics. However, when consulting the Macmillan Dictionary (2010) the description
offered is significantly less conclusive:
"ideas, attitudes, or styles of art, literature, or thinking that have developed after modernism, often as
a reaction against "
The main accent is set on the chronological aspect of postmodernism and its logical and historical
flow offering the reader not enough information to identify a clear period or any particular feature.
Only by comparing the two definitions, a very small part of the available explanations on the
subject, and at the same time reading them together one can identify one of the main components of
the movement: diversity in all its aspects. The difference in these definitions is not just a simple
coincidence and should be taken as a figure of speech for the description of the entire period.
During this time critics and writers, artists and architects etc. have tried to find a proper explanation
for the changes they were being part of, concretised in what became known as Postmodernism.
During the 1960s 'attacks' started appearing against the elitism shown by modernism. One of the
first voices pointing at modernism's faults was the poet Karl Shapiro , who in 1959 in an article for
The Times Book

Postmodern World, By Jean-FranГ§ois Lyotard
A man is sitting and enjoying his morning coffee when all of a sudden he hears this alarm. He
knows not where is comes from, but it sounds close; he opens his eyes in his bed. In the moments
prior, he was in total agreement that his hot cup of coffee was real, but now it is a far off dream.
Now he questions what else in this world is real; critics argue over weather postmodernism is a
rejection or ignorance of the metanarrative and simulations in the world.
Both Jean–FranГ§ois Lyotard and Jean Baudrillard explore the idea a what is the postmodern world
and how it creates a postmodern condition in the people who inhabit it, but the two great thinkers
come twosome different conclusions. "Answering the question: what is the postmodern?" by
Jean–FranГ§ois Lyotard defines postmodernism as the death of the metanarrative, the explanations
created for society for everything that happens. Metanarriatives are built to make sense out of...show
more content...
The everyday 'reality' one interacts with is truly a simulated world filled with images,
advertisements, and pre–constructed world. Baudrillard used the example of Disneyland to
illustrate the idea of the false reality created; it is well understood when going to Disneyland that
it is an imaginary world full of simulations, but this simulation and hyperreal extend past the gates
into the rest of the postmodern world (Baudrillard 4). It is constructed to give its visitors a false
interpretation of the imaginary, that the adults who go their to be childish are not childish in the
"real world" (Baudrillard 5.). They believe that once they leave, the world they reenter is real,
because the once they are leaving is presented as imaginary. This is under the assumption that the
world outside it the standard of the real, but this is a false assumption since both worlds are

Essay on Modern and Post-Modernism Architecture
There is often some confusion when people start talking about the post–modernism and modernism
in architecture in terms of their philosophical terminology differences. Modern architecture is known
for its minimalism (Linder, 2004); buildings were functional and economical rather than comfortable
and beautifully decorated. The post–modernism architecture, however, is called a "neo–eclectic,
significantly assuming the role of a regeneration of period styles for designing houses, and a
never–ending variety of forms and characteristics, asymmetrical designs for commercial buildings"
(Fullerton Heritage, 2008). An example of these two polar opposites, "Less is more" made by Mies
van der Rohe in 1928 (Blake, 1976) and "Less is a bore" made by...show more content...
Although, most post–modernist architects had been associated with modern architects in terms of
training during the twentieth century, they refused most their teachers ideas. In addition, today's
architects cannot deny the modern architecture ways of designing any building. Their design, for
instance, has many philosophical meaning such as constructional, environmental, sociological,
commercial and metaphorical meaning. The main difference between these two schools is that the
architects point of view to any design as a means of communication (Chan, 1997). Modern
architecture, for example, focus on the aesthetics of architectural language, while post–modernity
adjust in constant effort to achieve what is more than unity and focus on the traditional concepts,
therefore both schools are in competition with each other. Second basic principle of modern school
is the production beauty by basic technology (Chan, 1997), and this led to a contradiction on the
post–modernism architects being attempted to use primitive technology. Their particular case is to
access and change the impact of the traditional architecture through all people. Therefore, to achieve
this goal they have addressed the issues of beauty and technology within the general concept of the
design. Despite different thoughts on the features of post–modernism definition, it is clearly seen
that people ,who are interested in beauties, are

Postmodernism in Literature
Postmodern literature
The term Postmodern literature is used to describe certain tendencies in post–World War II literature.
It is both a continuation of the experimentation championed by writers of the modernist period
(relying heavily, for example, on fragmentation, paradox, questionable narrators, etc.) and a reaction
against Enlightenment ideas implicit in Modernist literature.
Postmodern literature, like postmodernism as a whole, is difficult to define and there is little
agreement on the exact characteristics, scope, and importance of postmodern literature. However,
unifying features often coincide with Jean–FranГ§ois Lyotard's concept of the "meta–narrative" and
"little narrative", Jacques Derrida's concept of "play", and Jean...show more content...
Surrealist Rene Magritte's experiments with signification are used as examples by Jacques Derrida
and Michel Foucault. Foucault also uses examples from Jorge Luis Borges, an important direct
influence on many Postmodernist fiction writers. He is occasionally listed as a Postmodernist
though he started writing in the 1920s. The influence of his experiments with metafiction and
magical realism was not fully realized until the postmodern period.[2]
Comparisons with modernist literature
Both modern and postmodern literature represent a break from 19th century realism, in which a
story was told from an objective or omniscient point of view. In character development, both modern
and postmodern literature explore subjectivism, turning from external reality to examine inner states
of consciousness, in many cases drawing on modernist examples in the stream of consciousness
styles of Virginia Woolf and James Joyce, or explorative poems like The Waste Land by T. S. Eliot.
In addition, both modern and postmodern literature explore fragmentariness in narrative– and
character–construction. The Waste Land is often cited as a means of distinguishing modern and
postmodern literature. The poem is fragmentary and employs pastiche like much postmodern
literature, but the speaker in The Waste Land says, "these fragments I have shored against my ruins".
Modernist literature sees fragmentation and extreme subjectivity as an existential crisis, or Freudian

Essay On Postmodernism
The concept of postmodernism is complex in that it does not share a common stream of thoughts
but rather plays individual idea of post modernism into different parts of fields. According to A
Reader's Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory by Raman Selden, "some see it as simply the
continuation and development of modernist ideas, while others have seen in postmodern art a
radical break with classical modernism." Depending on which field it is being applied on,
postmodernism shows unalike features of trends. In architecture, literature, art, film, and more,
postmodernism has shown distinct and unique identity. In literature, there is no clear beginning and
endings as did in modernistic literature. The meaning of the literature is not to be found and
meaningless in that postmodernism bases its root on ontological uncertainty....show more content...
In postmodernism, there may or may not be a moral which may change depending on the context of
both the reader and writer. In architecture, double–coding, combination of the traditional style and
contemporary context was brought to light. Piazza d'Italia in New Orleans, Die Neue Staatsgalerie
in Stuttgart are examples of this. In art the destruction of the distinction between commercial culture
and the elite culture was emphasized. The mass crowd were made to more easily access the works
of art which the modernists considered exclusive to the elite. Postmodernism has rejected traditional
values and ideas in its own way in various fields, so the definition of postmodernism cannot be
reduced down into one line. Since the rise of postmodernism was in objection to the boundaries and
limits of the tradition, it may be that postmodernism cannot be cleared down into a single

Postmodernism : A Consensus On Postmodernism
Of Precise Ambiguity
A Consensus on Postmodernism
C. Jencks, H. Klotz & W. Curtis
Postmodernism is a universal movement, present in every art and discipline. In architecture,
postmodernism is precise as well as ambiguous thereby in need of an explorative pursuit for a
consensus of what is meant by the movement in this perspective – between the works of Charles
Jencks, a primary theorist of this architectural turn; Heinrich Klotz, a leading architectural critic; and
William Curtis, an architectural historian. The progression of this paper is highly influenced with
Jencks' studies as his works are often times referenced as well by both Klotz and Curtis in their
individual interpretations and further accompanied with either supporting statements or
contradictions. Charles Jencks suggests the concept of double coding in several aspects. Primarily,
that architects become public–oriented rather than peer–oriented; to design structures that appeal to
both these constituencies and beyond the architectural world. The concept of double coding
prompted a new approach to architecture to accommodate these distinct needs – an approach that
was a form of eclecticism of both old and new styles that now dominate the present world. On his
book on Modern Architecture, Curtis writes that modern architecture was faulted for it's "supposed
lack of 'recognizable imagery'" towards the end of the 1970s. This statement supports the idea of
Jencks' double coding where architects must now make

Postmodernism Essay
Postmodernism
The 20th Century, in many ways, can be remembered as a time of scientific and technological
revolution. The innovations and rapid growth in many areas of technology have cast doubt upon
words such as ignorance and impossibility. This revolution also instigated new and/or radical ideas
in the world of academia. The growth of post–modernism and its adherers in historical circles have
caused quite a stir in dealing with the validity of many historical documents. Critical analysis of the
subject of modernism and post–modernism can be simplified in one statement: What is our
understanding of certainty? The modern critical analysis form is an ideal philosophy of
industrialism, an ideology that adopts the...show more content...
The common goal for modern historians is to find HISTORY, truth, and moral rights by
methodically deducing facts and past events. By such ways, the truthful understanding of the past
makes history useful for us in the present. In post–modern critical analysis, its philosophy lies in the
critiquing the false in modernism. Truth/fact is merely a socially constructed ideal dependent on the
context in which it is used [connotative meanings]. Post–modernists debunk the importance of fact
due to limited personal perspectives. Since each person could have numerous perspectives on issues,
the shear number would constitute the many facts once could have. Opposed to the modernist
philosophy reflecting Western history, post–modernism follows an Eastern eclectic form of what
history might be. In relation to historical analysis, post–modernism raises the importance of context.
Truth/fact is dependent on the time, place and the observer. Post–modernists see many historical
documents as a narrative, stories in which their validity is questionable and thus it cannot be
completely true. For the record, I am a modernist with some post–modernist ideals. Modern critical
analysis of history appears to be more fathomable than post–modernism. To look at the world around
us objectively correlates events with reality, and gives meaning to why things happen and to prevent
bad things from repeating in the future.

Postmodernism And Its Impact On Society
'Postmodernism' is a concept that has been debated from its inception, yet has not been given a clear
undisputed definition by the academics of art history. However, the general sense by those who have
endeavoured to do so have a commonality; that postmodernism is a movement of the late
20th–century that fundamentally rejects the modernist desire for perfection, purity and essential
form. It is the denunciation of the 'grand narrative' that suggests society must function according to a
unified and centred idea system, where society develops in a linear progression accordingly.
Professor of Cultural Studies at the London College of Fashion, Elizabeth Wilson, suggests that the
term 'postmodern,' functions as an expression of the spirit of the time. It is a code word or summary
for the immense change experienced by society at the turn of the century on cultural, economic and
political levels primarily related to the developing culture of capitalism, globalization and mass
consumption. Most importantly Wilson asserts, is that postmodernism expresses an attitude of
'ambivalence.' That is, acknowledging the triumph of a capitalist society, yet believing that its
influence is having an unstoppable degrading effect on society. Thus, the methods adopted in
reaction to these tremendous changes, often manifested as protests of defiance, are referred to as
'postmodern.'
In terms of art and design, artists and designers have adopted tactics to portray their binary and

Modernist and Post–modernist in Development Modernism is closely associated with the setting in
of modern civilization compared to postmodernism. It is modernism that lay the foundation for
postmodernism (Muller 312). After the World War II, the human race achieved what is referred to as
postmodernism. The two concepts may appear antagonistic in nature, but a closer look at each
reveals how well each complements the other. Art and literature are among the numerous human
aspects that have been influenced in diverse ways by the concepts of modernism and
post–modernism. In this paper, the significance of developmental studies in elaborating the two
concepts as the poles of negotiation rather than competing concepts shall be highlighted more so
from Miller's school of thought.
Modernist concept in enhancing sustained engagement
In this case, we realize that modernism always tends to exclude the order and the rationality mainly
in politics that come with the movements. It is geared as "two poles of negotiation" majorly in the
context of agreement in that it is geared and motivated towards various masses and people.
Schneider stipulates this when he comes out vividly in comparison of his art to that of the ancient
time by saying that his work was fine simply because his portrayals were eye appealing and they
...show more content...
It facilitated the fast developmental phases.From this, we realize that some of the hypothesis within
modernization and those that make it an essential characteristic of the developmental feature, are
that various politics tend to employ different ways of

Modernism And Postmodernism
Modernism began at the end of the civil war and ended (at least on an intellectual level) when the
USA dropped the first atomic bomb. Modernism, whether it has to do with visual art, music or
literature, gets its meaning from the idea that truth derives from effort. If one looks at the Empire
State Building, a modernist building, one can see that it starts about a block wide at its base and
tapers to a spire at the very top. This spire is the culmination of tremendous effort, it is truth. Once
humans realized that everything we had worked towards can be wiped out in an instant, something
snapped and some began to think "what's the point?". That idea culminated with "Well, why even
work hard for truth? Truth should be what is immediately evident." That was the beginning of the
Postmodernist movement. Postmodernism rejects the idea that any text or product or media is
inherently more valuable than any other. Culture is a snake eating its own tail. Everything old is
new again. Everything deserves to be viewed as art. Everything deserves an audience to consume it.
With Modernism, you only get to truth, enlightenment and value through work. With
Postmodernism, you don't have to do that at all. Everything is beautiful how it is. But if everything's
beautiful, nothing's beautiful. And therein lies the snake eating its own tail. Postmodernism
inevitably goes around in circles, but that does not have to be a bad thing.
Postmodernism in the realm of visual art was a direct rebellion

Differences Between Modern And Postmodernism
deception of a generation who has no answers. It refuses the safe scheme of realist tradition offering
an alternative object that doesn't explain what it represents but hints another beauty and a different
order for those who will never die. Postmodernist is a depthless response to the inevitable. It is not
interested in offering solution because postmodernism doesn't have any. It doesn't solve the tragedy
it takes it for granted, it has learnt how to live with natural disasters and the thread of a nuclear
moment. It doesn't suggest alternative beauty or reachable peace but it toys with the shallowest
aspect of contemporaneity, consumerism and daily issues. It waits the end for those who will die
tomorrow. Wang Ning, based on Ihab Hassan's essay, outlines eleven major differences between
modern and postmodern . While offering reasoning of my ontological disagreement for a
generalization that underestimate the darkness of modernism might take us out of track, wide
comparison might help the reader to go through what will follow:
(1)...show more content...
(2)The modernist aesthetic is still an aesthetic of the sublime, while the postmodernist aesthetic is
strongly colored with contemporary commercialization and is definitely orientated toward popular
culture and literature so as to represent 'the unpresentable' things; modernism has a strong elite sense,
while postmodernism tries to bridge the gap between high culture and popular culture
(3)Engaged in the various hierarchies, modernism appeals to the established order and peace, while
postmodernism keeps making trouble and creating

Postmodernism: The Movement in Life Essay
Although the postmodern movement was not started in America, its many effects have influenced
the culture of this nation. Postmodernism took America from a place where it held strong values of
right and wrong, to a place where any idea has been given validity and merit. By presenting new
world views, postmodernism has affected American literature, for both the writer and the reader, and
American culture on a vast scale.Explaining postmodernism is very challenging because it does not
have a real meaning other than "after modernism" (Merriam–Webster). Postmodernism has
influenced every aspect of American culture from literature and the media to family and social
relationships as well as the way a person views himself and the world around...show more content...
Using playfulness and irony may not have started with postmodern authors, but they have become
central aspects in many of their works. A common example of this is the way a postmodern writer
treats serious subjects in a playful and humorous way. In Catch–22, Joseph Heller addresses the
events of World War II as a comedy of extreme darkness. It was the first novel to transform WWII
from a human tragedy into an absurdist comedy by using satire and dark humor (Sexton). Another
example of black humor and irony is in the works of Kurt Vonnegut. In his book Cat's Cradle,
Vonnegut touches on the issues of science and religion in a way they must be mocked by humor. He
does all of this in a light and sarcastic method in order to make the reader laugh at himself rather than
be offend by this writing (Johnson).Postmodernism has brought music from a place where the
primary focus was on musical fundamentals and expression to place where "commodity being sold
by record companies and pop stars is not the fundamentals of the music, but the cultural image
surrounding the music, which reverberates through film, television, and other media." (
knowledgerush.com). Media is a source that has helped move the music industry by playing
incorporating soundtracks in movies and television shows. Music is everywhere. People are taking
little parts of different genres and mixing them together to make "new music." This musical

The Transition to Postmodernism Essay
The Transition to Postmodernism
Works Cited Not Included
Postmodernism is a difficult term to define, as it is evident in many different disciplines, such as art,
literature, architecture, technology, and, the precise emerging moment of this movement is also
hard to identify. In order to truly understand `Postmodernism,' one must first identify with `
Modernism' and it's subsequent decline which led to the appearance of the Post–modern ear. It is
often suggested that Postmodernity is simply a continuation or advancement of Modernity. For
example, Bauman, (Crook, Pakulski, & Walters, 1992: p.2) claims that `Postmodernism is simply a
replacement of "classical" Modern capitalist society'. However, this assumption has undergone much
debate...show more content...
The sudden upheaval of Modernism was not wholly shocking, as it did offer some assurance as to
direction this change was taking; modern societies were going to "grow and differentiate." (Crook,
Pakulski, & Walters, 1992: p.2) This can be seen in Anderson's text, Modernity and Revolution. In
it, he evokes the arguments of Marshall Berman in All That Is Solid Melts Into Air, in which
Berman shone light once again on the relationship between Modernity and revolution. Modernism
is acknowledged as a `body of experience' (Anderson, EL875) of which is universally and globally
shared. Berman and Anderson reflect on Modernism in a positive way, underlining that it can "unite
all mankind." This movement, according to Anderson, would not only envelope experiences of
adventure and development, but would also, as I mentioned previously, endanger all that we are
familiar with, and thus, in Marx's words, "all that is solid melts into air."(Anderson, EL875; p.317)
Anderson questions the propeller of this whirlpool of change and identifies the initiator as
"socioeconomic modernization"; these being social processes such as scientific advances and
urbanization. These new "ideas" and "visions" allow each person to change and claim this new age
as their own. Anderson distinguishes the connection between the terms `Modernity,' `Modernization;
and `Modernism.' He states that `Modernity' is the process which links the economics of
`Modernization' and the culture of `Modernism.' This is the

Postmodernism Essay
Postmodernism Postmodernism blends old themes with new contemporary issues to create beautiful
artwork that commands, questions, and captivates all viewers to participate in discovering its inner
meaning. Along with an inner meaning and beauty, it was used as a form of communication that was
directed towards social, political, and cultural problems within the world. An architect Robert Stern
states, " The fundamental shift to post–modernism has to do with the reawakening of artists in every
field to public responsibilities of art. Once again art is being regarded as an act of communication."
(Wilkin, Schultz, Linduff, "Art Past Art Present, p.579) The postmodern era emancipated its artists
from old traditional barriers that...show more content...
His style is unique in that he chooses five major squares to encapsulate her face, but also used
many little squares of various colors to blur her image. Jean resembles traditional art by making the
center square a focal point. Again mixing the old with a new twist.
Thematically it represents to me a person with several different faces each with different personality
within one formed entity. Jean's Mona Lisa breaks down the cultural barriers that separate different
cultures of today. Perhaps each square represents one or many different cultures striving for
completeness and unity, which is represented by the middle image, which could be another
translation. Politically it represents freedom of choice and democracy, which has come a long way
since early 1900's. Each person in the image has their own opinion and when each opinion is
combined and agreed upon then the real power lies within numbers. Which is how are political
structure is structured. One person chosen by election to represent the majority.
Another artist of the postmodern era is a poet name Octavio Paz born in 1914–1999 in Mexico. Paz
along with many others believed that language could make oneself be very expressive. His poem
called "To Talk" expresses the feeling that mortal man has special powers that no other being even
the gods do not possess. If this poem was written back in the medieval or early times Paz would
have been persecuted

Postmodernism : Modernism And Postmodernism
Modernism and Postmodernism are both two important eras in design. Postmodernism takes a lot of
concepts from the modernism era. Both modernism and post modernism focus on Style, Social
analysis, Cultural Context, Philosophy, Politics, Human experience, Machine aesthetics, and the
constant transformation of the "New". An interesting fact of the Modernism and Postmodernism is
the use of the psychology and philosophy themes 1. Subjectivity 2.History 3. Culture and 4.
Theoretically divers aesthetics and ideologies. What differentiates the two from each other is the
postmodernism is more politically resistant, deconstructive, absent, uses the Signifier, Anarchy, and
Dadaist. In comparison to Modernism, which is more romantic, Symbolic, about Form for its
purpose, Hierarchy, Creation, Metaphor and Signified. This essay will talk about the influence of
modernism on postmodern design using Wolfgang Weingart, Atelier Populaire posters and
comparing it to Moholy Nagy's' posters of modernism. The two designs selected from the Eskilson
Textbook Graphic Design a New History on postmodernism are The Swiss Poster, 1984 offset
Lithograph by Wolfgang Weingart and The Struggle Continues, 1968 by Atelier Populaire. The
modernist designs selected from Moholy Nagy is Painting Photography Film, 1927 Book jacket. To
begin we will look at postmodern design and their aesthetics, technical context, Technology of
production and the message of the artworks. Postmodernism was full of emotion and had

Postmodernism: Christian Worldview
Postmodernism is a way of thinking this is when one denies the absolute truth, when they don't
see right or wrong ,good or evil. They feel as if the truth comes from their personal experiences .
Postmodernist denies ultimate reality as well as God and the fact that he is the reason that all
things exist. After many readings and studies there are many people are beginning to think as
such it seem as if it's a new trend. The purpose of this paper is give insight on postmodernism
worldview an why I feel that Christian worldview is greater. First this paper will give insight on
exactly what postmodernism is and how it has grown recently. Secondly, I will evaluate
postmodernism and explain how it viewed and their way of thinking. Third, I will...show more
content...
Whereas logic and truth is not important as they see it. They have rejected the supremacy of
revelation, the idea of truth as well as the idea that a better people can be produced though the
submission of reason and truth. We know that everything must have a source, the source is of
Ultimate Authority for a Christian would be the scriptures because this is consider a road map our
instructions. On the other hand Postmodernist see things very different they don't see Scriptures for
what they are. They do not see the authority and don't give it any credibility refusing the fact that the
scriptures hold power. As Christians we know thatJesus Christ is revealed through the scriptures.
The scriptures serves as a road map and they speak with authority from God. Even though
Postmodernism see it totally different as not having any authority , credibility and rejecting the
scriptures we as Christian understand and using the scriptures as our instruction

Modernism vs Postmodernism Essay
'It quickly emerged that the proper and unique area of competence of each art coincided with all that
was unique to the nature of its medium. The task of self–criticism became to eliminate from the
effects of each art any and every effect that might conceivably be borrowed from or by the
medium of any other art. Thereby each art would be rendered 'pure', and in its 'purify' find the
guarantee of its standards of quality as well as of its independence. 'Purity' meant self–definition, and
the enterprise of self–criticism in the arts became one of self–definition, with a vengeance.'
(Greenberg, 'Modernist Painting', Art in Theory, p.755)
'Greenberg's aesthetics are the terminal point of [an] historical trajectory. There is another history
...show more content...
This implies that painting, rather than 'using art to conceal art' (ibid) by creating illusionistic space
and depth, should rather use art 'to call attention to art' (ibid), that is, to emphasise the unique
characteristics of the medium; 'the flat surface, the shape of the support, the properties of pigment'
(ibid). Greenberg states that such a process would render art 'pure', that is, autonomous, free of any
extraneous elements deriving from other arts, such as theatricality or narrative. The impact of a
painting should thus derive from those technical aspects characteristic of painting, such as colour,
form and composition. An example of the sort of painting Greenberg was advocating at the time may
clarify this. Morris Louis's painting Alpha–Phi (pl.D10) is exactly contemporary with the publication
of 'Modernist Painting'. It consists of bold, ragged, diagonal streaks of pure colour against an
off–white ground; Louis's use of acrylic paints, which soak into the canvas, means that the colours
appear integrated with the ground and hence do not disrupt the flatness of the picture plane. Its
effect depends upon the arrangement of colours and the large scale of the painting which makes it
occupy 'so much of one's visual field that it loses its character as a discrete tactile object and
thereby become that much more purely a picture, a strictly visual entity' (Greenberg, 'Louis and
Noland', p.28). It is apparently devoid of references to

Postmodernism Essay

More Related Content

Similar to Postmodernism Essay

More from Best Paper Writing Services

Recently uploaded

Postmodernism Essay