Post an organized plan for how you intend to employ the creativity.docx

Post an organized plan for how you intend to employ the
creativity of your staff to create a new and innovative customer
loyalty program. (Note: Your plan should not describe a
customer loyalty program such as an extended warranty or a
maintenance plan. You do not need to develop the plan for the
loyalty program.) The idea is to develop a team with a diversity
of creative thinking styles from your staff (ideators, clarifiers,
developers, and implementers). Be sure to include:
· How you would bring a team together and lead them to start
such an initiative.
· The tools that you have used in this course (design thinking,
creative-thinking styles, etc.) to get your team to leave its
comfort zone and begin to generate potential ideas. Explain how
the thinking style diversity or lack thereof of your team could
potentially help or impede the plan.
· The techniques you and the team could use to filter/evaluate
potential ideas (divergent/convergent thinking) to create a
viable customer loyalty program strategy.
Use the resources from this week and from throughout the
course to support your plan.
Please use these headings in your discussion posts.
Initial Post Template
How You Would Bring a Team Together and Lead Them to Start
Such an Initiative
Course Related Tools to use on Team
Techniques to Filter/Evaluate ideas
APA References
This course is designed to expose you to various aspects of
White Collar Crime versus conventional crime. In recent years,
white collar crime has received more attention from the criminal
justice system, and there is reason to believe this attention will
increase in the coming years. The knowledge you will gain in

the course and the research you will undertake should yield a
final project in which you can conduct a technical analysis and
discussion of white collar crimes committed by criminals, in a
designated approved case study.
Synopsis for the Final Project (Due Unit 8):
In this course you will be required to complete a final project in
lieu of a final exam, which will have to be submitted during
Unit 8 of the course. Stated simply, this project will consist of a
case study and analysis of:
· Choose a white collar criminal case. The case study and
analysis focuses on your identification of the white collar crime
· Discuss the historical antecedents of the white collar crime.
· Discuss the historical developments of white collar crime and
how it relates to the topic of your choice.
· Explain some of the basic issues and problems confronting
contemporary law enforcement in combating the white collar
crime you are discussing.
· Describe the general structure of the white collar crime you
are discussing.
· Discuss the functions performed by local, state, and federal
law enforcement as well as private security agencies in
combating the white collar crime you are discussing.
· Describe the complex set of relationships that exist between
the public, the government, the police, and private security
firms in the fight against this white collar crime
Remember, this type of assignment will require research,
thought, analysis and the application of the material we will
cover in this course. You will be required to submit a five (6)
page minimum (standard size) and (8) page maximum size12 pt
font, double spaced document and fully referenced using APA
citation style for all source materials. The paper shall be in 12

font, Arial, and shall not have been turned in previously to any
other instructor. The document must include your name, MOD
and course title.
NOTE: the title page and citation / bibliography page do NOT
count as pages.
You should review the grading rubric before beginning the
project, while writing the document and upon completion to
ensure you have covered all that is required in your final
draft.Evaluation Rubric for Final Project Assignment
CRITERIA
Novice
Proficient
Exemplary
Identified the Elements of Applicable white collar crime
Violations
Project simply stated the crimes but failed to identify the
elements of the crimes No critical evaluation.
0-20 points
Project identified some of the crimes and the respective
elements of each white collar crime, and identified; some
critical thinking and analysis are evident.
21-26 points
Project clearly identifies the crimes and the respective elements
of each white collar crime, and critical thinking and analysis are
evident.

27-30 points
Accurate Support
Project contained many inaccuracies or assumptions not
supported by law, precedents, or established criminal law.
0-20 points
Project contained only minor inaccuracies or at least one
assumption not supported by law, precedents, or established
criminal law.
21-26 points
Project is accurate, substantive and assumptions are completely
supported by applicable law, precedents, or acceptable criminal
law.
27-30 points
Technical Requirements
Some technical requirements were incorporated and/or the case
used in the final project was NOT submitted with support and
approved by the instructor in Unit 2.
0-13 points
Most technical requirements were incorporated and the case
used in the final project was submitted with support and
14-17 points
All technical requirements were incorporated and the case used
in the final project was submitted with support and approved by
the instructor in Unit 2.
18-20 points
Professional Writing and Format
Errors impede professional presentation; guidelines not
followed.
0-13 points
Few errors that do not impede professional presentation, but

should have been edited.
14-17 points
Writing and format is clear, professional, APA compliant, and
error free.
18-20 points
Total Points for Assignment
100 points
This course is designed to expose you to various aspects of
White Collar Crime versus conventional crime. In recent years,
white collar crime has received more attention from the criminal
justice system, and there is reason to believe this attention will
increase in the coming years. The knowledge you will gain in
the course and the research you will undertake should yield a
final project in which you can conduct a technical analysis and
discussion of white collar crimes committed by criminals, in a
designated approved case study.

are discussing.
and course title.
count as pages.
ensure you have covered all that is required in your final
draft.Evaluation Rubric for Final Project Assignment
CRITERIA
Novice
Proficient
Exemplary
Identified the Elements of Applicable white collar crime

Violations
Project simply stated the crimes but failed to identify the
elements of the crimes No critical evaluation.
0-20 points
Project identified some of the crimes and the respective
elements of each white collar crime, and identified; some
critical thinking and analysis are evident.
21-26 points
Project clearly identifies the crimes and the respective elements
of each white collar crime, and critical thinking and analysis are
evident.
27-30 points
Accurate Support
Project contained many inaccuracies or assumptions not
supported by law, precedents, or established criminal law.
0-20 points
Project contained only minor inaccuracies or at least one
assumption not supported by law, precedents, or established
criminal law.
21-26 points
Project is accurate, substantive and assumptions are completely
supported by applicable law, precedents, or acceptable criminal
law.
27-30 points
Technical Requirements
Some technical requirements were incorporated and/or the case
used in the final project was NOT submitted with support and

0-13 points
Most technical requirements were incorporated and the case
used in the final project was submitted with support and
14-17 points
All technical requirements were incorporated and the case used
in the final project was submitted with support and approved by
the instructor in Unit 2.
18-20 points
Professional Writing and Format
Errors impede professional presentation; guidelines not
followed.
0-13 points
Few errors that do not impede professional presentation, but
should have been edited.
14-17 points
Writing and format is clear, professional, APA compliant, and
error free.
18-20 points
Total Points for Assignment
100 points
Running head: ENRON 1
ENRON 2

Enron
Having revenue that is more than $100 billion and the
named distinction by fortune as most innovative company in
America, Enron was the indestructible energy seemingly giant
at the start of the 2000s. Therefore, during the time it rises in
the 90’s, there were rumors that it had accounting procedures
that were illegal with the accounting firm Arthur Andersen LLP,
and also the Big Five accounting firm (Ferenczy, 2019). Jeffrey
Skilling, who was a Chief Executive Officer, had millions of
dollars of debt that was hidden through poor financial reporting,
accounting loopholes using special entities purpose. Andrew
Fastow, Chief Operations Officer, deceived the Board of
Directors with his board practices and the Arthur Andersen firm
went along for the ride. After plummet of the stock, the Security
and Exchange Commission conducted an investigation and it
ultimately resulted in a 24-year prison sentence for Jeffrey
Skilling and a six-year term for Fastow. Kenneth Lay, who was
a founder, died of a heart attack before sentencing.
The Enron scandal was public by October 2001. The scandal
brought out the bankruptcy of the Enron Corporation, an energy
company based in Houston, Texas and the dissolution of the
accounting firm Arthur Andersen, LLP. This was the largest
bankruptcy of an American Organization in history at the time.
Shareholders of Enron filled a lawsuit of $40 billion after the
price of the stock in the company; this brought a high of $90.75
per share in the middle of 2000, and plummeted to less than $1
by the end of November 2001. The United States Exchange and

Securities Commission started an investigation, and rival
competitor Houston Dynegy made a lowball offer to purchase
the company. There was a fail in the deal, and on December 2,
2001, Enron filed for Chapter 11. Enron’s 63.4 billion dollar
assets made it being the biggest bankruptcy in corporate
America’s history until the bankruptcy of WorldCom the next
year.
Many Enron executives were charged with a variety of
crimes and sentenced to prison (Ugwulali, 2019). Arthur
Andersen LLP was caught destroying documents that were
pertinent Security and Exchange Commission’s investigation
which render void its ability to audit a public trading company.
The company was audited and effectively closed. Shareholders
and employees at Enron received returns that were limited in
lawsuit, despite having lost billions in stock prices and
pensions. Consequently, due to the scandal, new legislation and
regulations were made for expanding the financial reporting
accuracy for public trading companies. One legislation piece,
the Act of Sarbanes-Oxley, increased the penalties for altering,
fabricating or destroying federal investigation records for trying
to defraud shareholders.
Court Documentation, Articles, Reports
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP V. UNITED STATES. (2005,
May 31). Retrieved February 25, 2020, from
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-368.ZS.html
Former Enron Chief Financial Officer Andrew Fastow Pleads
Guilty to Conspiracy to Commit Securities and Wire Fraud,
Agrees to Cooperate with Enron Investigation. (2004, January
14). Retrieved February 25, 2020, from
https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/pressrel/press-
releases/former-enron-chief-financial-officer-andrew-fastow-
pleads-guilty-to-conspiracy-to-commit-securities-and-wire-
fraud
Former Enron Chief Financial Officer Andrew Fastow

Sentenced to Six Years in Prison for Conspiracy to Commit
Securities and Wire Fraud. (n.d.). Retrieved February 25, 2020,
from
https://www.justice.gov/archive/opa/pr/2006/September/06_crm
_647.html
Skilling v. United States, 561 U.S. 358 (2010). (n.d.). Retrieved
February 25, 2020, from
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/561/358/
United States Department of Justice, & Doj. (n.d.). U.S.
Department of Justice Case Highlights. Retrieved February 25,
2020, from https://www.justice.gov/archive/index-enron.html
References
Ginsburg, M. D., Rocap, D. E., & Levin, J. S. (2019). Mergers,
Acquisitions, & Buyouts: November 2019 Edition. Aspen
Publishers.
Ugwulali, J. (2019). Essentials of Forensic Accounting and
Fraud Management. First Edition Design Pub.

Ferenczy, I. H. (2019). Employee Benefits in Mergers and
Acquisitions: 2019-2020 Edition. Aspen Publishers.
are discussing.

and course title.
count as pages.
ensure you have covered all that is required in your final draft.

Post an organized plan for how you intend to employ the creativity.docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from stilliegeorgiana

More from stilliegeorgiana (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Post an organized plan for how you intend to employ the creativity.docx