The district level vigilance and monitoring committee (DVMC) is responsible for monitoring the implementation of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989. The DVMC consists of members of parliament, state legislative assembly, police, government officers from SC/ST communities, NGO representatives, and is chaired by the District Magistrate. The DVMC meets at least once every three months to review the implementation of the act, relief efforts for victims, prosecutions, and the performance of investigating officers, special public prosecutors, and judges in handling cases under the act.

1. DVMC Roles and Responsibilities CMASK 2013; page [1]
Ph.044-2235 3503 email: contact@hrf.net.in
DVMC Roles and Responsibilities
To monitor the implementation of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)
Act 1989 and Rules 1995 (POA) there are mechanisms at the State and District levels. The district level
mechanism is the district level vigilance and monitoring committee DVMC (Rule 17 of the POA).
Setting up the DVMC [Rule 17(1)]
1. In each district within the State, the District Magistrate shall set up a vigilance and monitoring
committee.
Members of the DVMC [Rule 17(2)]
2. The district level vigilance and monitoring committee (DVMC) shall consist of
(a) Members of the Parliament and State Legislative Assembly and Legislative Council.
(b) Superintendent of Police.
(c) Three-group 'A' Officers, Gazetted Officers of the State Government belonging to the SC/ST.
(d) Not more than 5 non-official members belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled
Tribes.
(e) Not more than 3 members from the categories other than SCs/STs having association with NGOs.
(f) The District Magistrate shall be the Chairman.
(g) The District Social Welfare Officer shall be the Member-Secretary.
Meetings [Rule 17(3)]
3. The district level committee shall meet at least once in three months.
4. If the meeting is not convened every quarter, complain to the state nodal officer [9] requesting him to
conduct an inquiry and take action under Section 4 of the Act Punishment for neglect of duties. Follow
up the letter after three months with a request under RTI asking for the action taken report on your
complaint.
Meeting agenda and role of the DVMC [Rule 17(1)]
5. The meetings of the DVMC are restricted only to the members of the DVMC and to the specific
purpose under the Act and Rules. They cannot be clubbed with the public grievances or the monthly
meetings.
6. The DVMC shall review
(a) Implementation of the provisions of the Act.
(b) Relief and rehabilitation facilities provided to the victims and other matters connected therewith.
(c) Prosecution of cases under the Act.
(d) Role of different officers responsible for implementing the provisions of the Act.
(e) Role of different agencies responsible for implementing the provisions of the Act.
(f) Various reports received by the District Administration (This would include reports under Rule
12(7) for each case).
7. In addition, the DVMC can also (vide Karnataka state circular SWD 62 SPA 2009, dated 20-07-2010)
(a) Identify atrocity prone areas.
(b) Suggest measures to prevent atrocities in those areas.
8. For every investigating officer (IO), the DVMC shall review the number of:
(a) Cases investigated.
(b) Cases for which investigation is completed in 30 days [7(2)]
(c) Cases for which ‘B’ report has been filed.
(d) Cases for which charge sheet has been filed.
(e) Accused in FIR.
(f) Accused in charge sheet.
(g) Cases ending in conviction.
(h) Accused acquitted (including in the cases for which there is conviction).
This is not explicitly mentioned in the Act, but a review of the role of the IO would entail this at the very
minimum.
9. For every Special Public Prosecutor (SPP), the DVMC shall review the number of:
(a) Cases argued.
(b) Cases ending in conviction.

2. DVMC Roles and Responsibilities CMASK 2013; page [2]
Ph.044-2235 3503 email: contact@hrf.net.in
(c) Accused in charge sheet.
(d) Accused acquitted (including in the cases for which there is conviction).
This is not explicitly mentioned in the Act, but a review of the role of the SPP would entail this at the
very minimum. They can call for the report submitted to the state government on the performance of the
SPPs in January and July [4(2)], which will (should) contain this information.
10. For every judge hearing cases under this Act (whether designated special court or not), the DVMC
shall review the number of:
(a) Cases listed.
(b) Cases heard.
(c) Cases ending in conviction.
(d) Accused in charge sheet.
(e) Accused acquitted (including in the cases for which there is conviction).
This is not explicitly mentioned in the Act, but a review of the role of the judge would entail this at the
very minimum. Some judges have a 100% acquittal rate.
11. It is important to track both the number of cases ending in conviction and the number of accused
convicted since even in the cases ending in conviction 9 out of 10 accused may be acquitted (i.e. 90%
acquittal).