Ti-6Al-4V for Functionally Graded
  Orthopedic Implant Applications


              PhD Dissertation Proposal


                                 Kyle Crosby



                 University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
   Motivation
    ◦ Biomedical implant issues
   Ti-6Al-4V Background
    ◦ Properties, processing and applications
   Proposed Research Objective
    ◦ Functionally graded orthopedic implant
   Proposed Methodology
    ◦ Powder processing and sintering techniques
   Preliminary Results and What’s Left To Do
    ◦ Characterization of powders and sintered bodies
   Conclusion
    ◦ Viability as an artificial biological component

                                University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
   Biomedical implant
    ◦ Femoral stem, cup and ball socket
   Invasive operation
    ◦ Long, painfull rehab and recovery time
   Secondary surgery within 5-25 years to repair
    or replace implant
    ◦ Fracture of metallic implants due to stress
      concentration sites and contaminates (i.e. pores
      and composition gradients)
    ◦ Implant loosening due to poor mechanical bonding
      between metallic implant and native bone


                              University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
   Metallic components
    ◦ Stainless steel, pure titanium, titanium alloys, Co-
      Cr alloys
   Surface structures
    ◦ Porous surface network to allow for bone ingrowth
      and improved mechanical interlocking
    ◦ Pores act as stress amplifiers
   Bioactive coatings
    ◦ Hydroxyapatite ceramic mimics natural bone
      because HA is composed of mainly calcium
      phosphate


                               University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
   Ti-6Al-4V vitals
    ◦ Lightweight
         D = 4.45 g/cm3
    ◦ High strength
         σYS = 924 MPa
    ◦   Cheaper than pure Ti
    ◦   Corrosion resistant
    ◦   Biocompatible
    ◦   HCP @ R.T.




                               University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
   Cast
    ◦ Sheet, barstock, ingot from a melt
       High cost to maintain melt temperature continuously
       Contamination of gases during melting and from crucible/mold during
        pouring

   Forged
    ◦ Better mechanical properties
    ◦ Additional processing step = additional cost

   Machining
    ◦ Difficult due to high hardness

   Powder Metallurgy (PREP)
    ◦ Tight geometrical tolerances
    ◦ Sintering process is less expensive than casting with equivalent
      mechanical properties


                                       University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
   Grade 5 α/β Alloy
    ◦ Aerospace
      Engine components
      Fasteners
    ◦ Marine
      Structural components
    ◦ Sporting goods
      Golf clubs, bicycles
    ◦ Jewelry
      Earrings, studs
    ◦ Biomedical
      Orthodontics
      Screws, pins, staples
      Total joint replacements



                                  University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
   Development of improved hip implant devices                               Ti-6Al-4V
    through functionally graded Ti-6Al-4V +                                    rich core
    Hydroxyapatite composite components.
    ◦   Avoid implant loosening
    ◦   Avoid bioceramic spallation
    ◦   Avoid infection and secondary surgery

   Currently, co-sintering of Ti-6Al-4V +HA leads
    to formation of oxide and phosphate phases
    which have poor mechanical properties and
    show adverse bioactivity

   Powder metallurgy and sintering studies are                                   HA rich
    conducted to reduce sintering temperature                                     surface
    below threshold where undesirable phases
    form

   Slurry preparation and co-sintering of Ti+HA
                                                         Current Ti                           Functionally
    using solid freeform fabrication technique
                                                          hip joint                          graded Ti/HA
                                                                                                hip joint



                                                University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
   Co-sintering of Ti-6Al-4V + HA components
    requires the temperature to be reduced below
    1000°C

    ◦ Thermodynamic alteration
      Diffusion mode shifted via particle size refinement and
       increased defect concentration
        bulk lattice limited → grain boundary limited

    ◦ Kinetic alteration
      Rate of thermal energy application (°C/min)
      Tube furnace, MWS, and SPS densification methods



                                   University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
   Powder processing
    ◦ Particle size reduction
    ◦ Crystallite/grain size reduction
    ◦ Particle morphology changes

   Green body formation
    ◦ Uniaxial pressure effect
    ◦ Uniaxial pressing of as rec, 1 hr and 4 hr SPEX powders

   Sintering conditions
    ◦ Heat generation method, ramp rate, holding time
    ◦ Crystallite/grain size after sintering
    ◦ Relative density after sintering


                                  University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
½” stainless steel

                                  ¼” stainless steel

                                  Ti-6Al-4V

                                  Stearic acid

                                  *Not to scale




University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
200 µm              250 µm                                     100 µm

 As received PREP     1 hr SPEX milled                       4 hr SPEX milled
Avg. Dia. = 110 µm   Avg. Dia. = 150 µm                     Avg. Dia. = 25 µm


                              University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
10000


                             9000


                             8000

                                                                                                                        Ti 6-4 as rec powder
                             7000
Relative Intensity (a.u.)




                                                                                                                        Ti 6-4 SPEX 2wt%/1hr

                             6000                                                                                       Ti 6-4 SPEX 3wt%/1hr

                                                                                                                        Ti 6-4 SPEX 3wt%/4hr
                             5000
                                                                                                                        Ti 6-4 SPEX 4wt%/1hr

                             4000                                                                                       Ti 6-4 SPEX 4wt%/2hr

                                                                                                                        Ti 6-4 SPEX 4wt%/3hr
                             3000
                                                                                                                        Ti 6-4 SPEX 4wt%/4hr

                                                                                                                        Ti 6-4 SPEX 5wt%/1hr
                             2000
                                                                                                                        Ti 6-4 SPEX 5wt%/4hr
                             1000
                                    20   30   40   50                 60           70           80           90
                                                        2 Theta (°)




                                                                           University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
120


     (1011)   c                                     100
                                                                                                           Ti 6-4 (002)

                                                                                                           Ti 6-4 (101)
     (0002)




                            Crystallite Size (nm)
                                                     80


                                                     60


                                                     40

                       a2
                                                     20


                                                      0
                                                          0             1             2              3      4             5
                                                                                      Milling Time (hr)

a3




                  a1



                                                              University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
(1011)   c                                     45
                                                                                                                  Ti 6-4 (002)
                                                    40
     (0002)                                                                                                       Ti 6-4 (101)
                                                    35




                            Crystallite Size (nm)
                                                    30

                                                    25

                                                    20
                       a2                           15

                                                    10

                                                     5

                                                     0
                                                         2                3                    4              5              6
a3                                                                              PCA Concentration (wt%)




                  a1



                                                             University of Connecticut - IMS       4/2/2013
As received Ti-6Al-4V PREP powder   4 hr SPEX milled Ti-6Al-4V powder




                                    University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
300 MPa




As received PREP powder   1 hr SPEX milled                          4 hr SPEX milled
    5 wt% PEG binder         no binder                                 no binder
      Dtheor = 50%          Dtheor = 46%                              Dtheor = 58%



                                  University of Connecticut - IMS    4/2/2013
NO      YES
Heavily oxided                                              Light surface
throughout                                                  oxidation

Low mechanical                                              Polishes to mirror
strength                                                    finish

Useless for load                                            High density
bearing


                        University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
   Tube furnace sintering (RHS)
    ◦ Radiant heating of green body, from outside
      inward, through furnace atmosphere by electrical
      resistance through molybdenum heating elements

   Spark plasma sintering
    ◦ Electrical resistance heating at contact point
      between each powder particle in the green body

   Microwave sintering
    ◦ Dipole interaction of particle-pores within green
      body with microwave radiation


                               University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
HOT


                                         COLD
V




    University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
   Sintering chamber
    ◦ Inert atmosphere
    ◦ Microwave transparent crucible (good dielectric)
    ◦ Particle-pore dipole interaction within green body



         COLD


         HOT




                                University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
As received      Sintered 2 hr                            Sintered 2 hr
300 MPa uniaxial     @ 1100°C                                 @ 1250°C
  Dtheor = 50%     Dtheor = 75%                             Dtheor = >97%




                          University of Connecticut - IMS    4/2/2013
15000
                                                                                                       Ti 6-4 as rec tube - 1250C/2hr

                            14000
                                                                                                       Ti 6-4 as rec tube - 1100C/2hr

                            13000                                                                      Ti 6-4 as rec SPS - 1000C/3min

                            12000                                                                      Ti 6-4 SPEX 4/4 tube - 1250C/2hr
Relative Intensity (a.u.)




                            11000                                                                      Ti 6-4 SPEX 4/4 tube - 1100C/2hr


                            10000                                                                      Ti 6-4 SPEX 4/4 SPS - 1000C/3min


                             9000                                                                      Ti 6-4 SPEX 4/4 SPS - 600C/5min


                             8000                                                                      Ti 6-4 SPEX 4/4 MWS - 1250C/30min


                                                                                                       Ti 6-4 SPEX 4/4 MWS - 900C/1hr
                             7000

                                                                                                       Ti 6-4 SPEX 4/1 tube - 1250C/2hr
                             6000
                                    20   30   40   50                 60   70        80         90
                                                        2 Theta (°)                                    Ti 6-4 SPEX 4/1 tube - 1100C/2hr




                                                                           University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
250

                                                                   Ti 6-4 (002)
     (1011)   c                                     200            Ti 6-4 (101)
     (0002)




                            Crystallite Size (nm)
                                                    150


                                                    100

                       a2
                                                     50


                                                      0
                                                          500     600    700      800   900   1000 1100 1200 1300
                                                                             Sinteirng Temperature (C)
a3




                  a1



                                                                University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
Ti 6Al-4V as rec.     Ti 6Al-4V as SPEX (1hr/4wt%)         Ti 6Al-4V as SPEX (4hr/4wt%)
1250°C/2hr → 90% dense     1250°C/2hr → 75% dense               1250°C/2hr → 97% dense




        500 µm                     500 µm                                  500 µm




       500 µm                       500 µm                                  500 µm
   Ti 6Al-4V as rec.          Ti 6Al-4V as SPEX             Ti 6Al-4V as SPEX (4hr/4wt%)
1100°C/2hr → 78% dense    (1hr/4wt%) 1100°C/2hr →             1100°C/2hr → 83% dense
                                  60% dense

                                        University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
Ti-6Al-4V 4 hr SPEX, MWS at 900C     Ti-6Al-4V 4 hr SPEX, MWS at 1250C
for 1 hr (95% center, 80% edge)      for 30 min (98% center, 81% edge)




                                   University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
3
                                     Ti 6Al-4V as Rec
                     2.5
                                     Ti 6Al-4V as SPEX 1000°C

                      2
 Displacement (mm)




                     1.5


                      1


                     0.5


                      0
                           0   100       200            300      400       500        600          700           800       900    1000
                                                                Temperature (°C)

                                  Pressure                                             Max                     Displacement
                                                          Displacement                                                           Density
  Sample ID                    Decrease Onset                                      Displacement                Plateau Temp
                                                         Onset Temp (°C)                                                         (g/cm3)
                                 Temp (°C)                                           Temp (°C)                      (°C)
Ti 6Al-4V as
                                      550                       620                    800                         880            4.31
     rec
Ti 6Al-4V as
                                      350                       350                    600                         750            4.27
 SPEX 1000

                                                                             University of Connecticut - IMS    4/2/2013
(a) Ti-6Al-4V as        (b) Ti-6Al-4V 4 hr SPEX             (c) Ti-6Al-4V 4 hr
received, SPS @ 1000C   as SPS @ 1000C for 3                SPEX as SPS @ 600C
for 3 min, 99%          min, 99%                            for 5 min, 96%



                                     University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
   SPEX milled powder sinters @ lower temp than as received PREP powder
    ◦ Smaller particle size = shorter diffusion distance = shorter diffusion time


    ◦ Increase grain boundary area = rate limiting diffusion mechanism shift DL → Dg.b.
                                       Dg.b. >> DL
   RHS to full theoretical density is possible
    ◦ Requires strict atmospheric control
    ◦ Heat penetration lag = longer sintering dwell times

   MWS offers lower temperature, faster sintering than RHS
    ◦ Pressureless sintering = complex geometry retention is possible
    ◦ Heat emination lag = porous surface regions

   SPS offers low temperature, rapid sintering
    ◦ Very high heating rates = rapid diffusion
    ◦ Uniaxial pressure from conductive die = complex geometry retention is difficult



                                               University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
   Activation energy measurement
    ◦ Track density as a function of sintering conditions

   Grain size analysis
    ◦ Monitor grain size as a function of sintering temperature

   Mechanical properties
    ◦ Compressive and tensile strengths
    ◦ Rockwell C and microhardness

   Biological properties
    ◦ Cell attachment (# per unit area)
    ◦ Cell spreading (lateral area coverage as a function of time in simulated
      body fluid)

   Composite Ti-HA co-sintering studies
    ◦ SPS parameter optimization




                                          University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
2C/min             4C/min             8C/min


                                    2C/min
                                                                                                                            700               700              700

                                                                                                                            800               800              800
                       150




                                                                Quench Temp (C)
Relative Density (%)




                       100                                                                                                  900               900              900

                        50                                                                                                 1000              1000             1000
                         0                                                                                                 1100              1100             1100
                             600    800       1000      1200
                                                                                                                           1250              1250             1250
                                   Quench Temperature (C)


                                    4C/min                                                                               8C/min
                       150
                                                                                                         150
Relative Density (%)




                                                                                  Relative Density (%)
                       100
                                                                                                         100
                        50
                                                                                                          50
                         0
                                                                                                           0
                             600    800       1000      1200
                                                                                                               600       800       1000       1200
                                   Quench Temperature (C)
                                                                                                                        Quench Temperature (C)



                                                               University of Connecticut - IMS                                    4/2/2013
4 hr SPEX powder           Sintering @ 900C                            Sintering @ 1250C


                  Grain size vs. mechanical strength ?
                 Grain size vs. activation energy barrier?
              Grain size vs. cell attachment and spreading?


                                     University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
   Compressive strength
    ◦ Quasi-static using cross-head speed of 1,10,100
      mm/min
    ◦ High strain rate using Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar at
      300, 900 s-1 frequency

   Tensile strength
    ◦ Strain until failure
    ◦ σYS , σUTS , E

   Rockwell C and microhardness
    ◦ Compare to as received powder, commercially cast or
      forged products and between each other


                                 University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
(a) HA as SPS @ 1000C   (b) Ti-6Al-4V 4 hr SPEX              (c) Ti-6Al-4V 4 hr SPEX
    for 3 min, 99%      (90 vol%) + HA (10 vol%)             (75 vol%) + HA (25 vol%)
                        as SPS @ 96%                         as SPS @ 1000C for 3
                                                             min, 83%



                                      University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
   Funding
    ◦ United States National Science Foundation contract CBET-
      0930365

   Supervision
    ◦ Dr Leon Shaw

   Instrumentation
    ◦ Dr. Claude Estournes (SPS at CIRIMAT in France), Dr. Ashraf Imam
      (MWS at NRL in D.C.), Jack Gromek (XRD), Roger Ristau and Lichun
      Zhang (TEM/SEM), Bob Bouchard and Matt Bebee (SPEX vial and die
      fabrication)

   Support
    ◦ Monica & Ling (HA synthesis and biostudies) and Girije Marathe
      (quartz tube sealing) as well as the rest of my groupmates and
      fellow grad students in MSE/IMS



                                     University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
   [1] Hennig, R., Lenosky, T., Trinkle, D., Rudin, S., Wilkins, J. "Classical potential describes martensitic
    phase transformations between the alpha, beta, and omega titanium phases," Physical Review B,
    78,054121, 2008.
   [2] Kubaschewski O., Wainwright C., and Kirby F.J., “The Heats of Formation in the Vanadium-Titanium-
    Aluminium System,” J. Inst. Met., 89, 1960, 139-144.
   [3] Honma BERES 7 Series Driver, honmagolf.com, 2010.
   [4] Solid Grade 5 Titanium, TNG Body Jewlery, 2012.
   [5] Deutsch, A., “Bike review: Merlin works CR 6/4,” Brooklyn Arches Cycling, 2012.
   [6] Titanium dental implants, Naomi Dental, 2011
   [7] Total hip replacement, defectivejoints.com, 2011
   [8] Shaw, L., “Rapid prototyping of functionally graded orthopedic implants via the slurry mixing and
    dispensing process,” NSF proposal submitted 2009.
   [9] What’s SPS, “Principles and mechanism of the SPS process,” Fuji Electronic Industrial Co.




                                                         University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
?
University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
   Armstrong starting powder
    ◦   Low apparent density (~5%)
    ◦   Sponge morphology with high SSA

   Slurry preparation
    ◦   Stable suspension
    ◦   Proper pH and viscosity

   Freeform 3D printing
    ◦   Tip diameter = slurry droplet size
           Lateral and layer thickness resolution


   Software development to allow for composition gradient from core to surface
    ◦   Must accommodate change in composition within each z-slice

   Mechanical and biological properties of functionally graded component
    ◦   Ti-HA composites via SPS

   Bioactivity as a function of surface roughness
    ◦   Cell # and lateral spreading as a function of SiC scratch width

   Surface functionalization
    ◦   Macropores filled with aerogel particles containing growth hormone or antibiotic


                                                     University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
SiC paper




    vs.




Ti-6Al-4V




      University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013
Antibiotic or
                                  pain relieving
                                  aerogel capsules




University of Connecticut - IMS   4/2/2013

PhD Dissertation Proposal Presentation

  • 1.
    Ti-6Al-4V for FunctionallyGraded Orthopedic Implant Applications PhD Dissertation Proposal Kyle Crosby University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 2.
    Motivation ◦ Biomedical implant issues  Ti-6Al-4V Background ◦ Properties, processing and applications  Proposed Research Objective ◦ Functionally graded orthopedic implant  Proposed Methodology ◦ Powder processing and sintering techniques  Preliminary Results and What’s Left To Do ◦ Characterization of powders and sintered bodies  Conclusion ◦ Viability as an artificial biological component University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 3.
    Biomedical implant ◦ Femoral stem, cup and ball socket  Invasive operation ◦ Long, painfull rehab and recovery time  Secondary surgery within 5-25 years to repair or replace implant ◦ Fracture of metallic implants due to stress concentration sites and contaminates (i.e. pores and composition gradients) ◦ Implant loosening due to poor mechanical bonding between metallic implant and native bone University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 4.
    Metallic components ◦ Stainless steel, pure titanium, titanium alloys, Co- Cr alloys  Surface structures ◦ Porous surface network to allow for bone ingrowth and improved mechanical interlocking ◦ Pores act as stress amplifiers  Bioactive coatings ◦ Hydroxyapatite ceramic mimics natural bone because HA is composed of mainly calcium phosphate University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 5.
    Ti-6Al-4V vitals ◦ Lightweight  D = 4.45 g/cm3 ◦ High strength  σYS = 924 MPa ◦ Cheaper than pure Ti ◦ Corrosion resistant ◦ Biocompatible ◦ HCP @ R.T. University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 6.
    Cast ◦ Sheet, barstock, ingot from a melt  High cost to maintain melt temperature continuously  Contamination of gases during melting and from crucible/mold during pouring  Forged ◦ Better mechanical properties ◦ Additional processing step = additional cost  Machining ◦ Difficult due to high hardness  Powder Metallurgy (PREP) ◦ Tight geometrical tolerances ◦ Sintering process is less expensive than casting with equivalent mechanical properties University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 7.
    Grade 5 α/β Alloy ◦ Aerospace  Engine components  Fasteners ◦ Marine  Structural components ◦ Sporting goods  Golf clubs, bicycles ◦ Jewelry  Earrings, studs ◦ Biomedical  Orthodontics  Screws, pins, staples  Total joint replacements University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 8.
    Development of improved hip implant devices Ti-6Al-4V through functionally graded Ti-6Al-4V + rich core Hydroxyapatite composite components. ◦ Avoid implant loosening ◦ Avoid bioceramic spallation ◦ Avoid infection and secondary surgery  Currently, co-sintering of Ti-6Al-4V +HA leads to formation of oxide and phosphate phases which have poor mechanical properties and show adverse bioactivity  Powder metallurgy and sintering studies are HA rich conducted to reduce sintering temperature surface below threshold where undesirable phases form  Slurry preparation and co-sintering of Ti+HA Current Ti Functionally using solid freeform fabrication technique hip joint graded Ti/HA hip joint University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 9.
    Co-sintering of Ti-6Al-4V + HA components requires the temperature to be reduced below 1000°C ◦ Thermodynamic alteration  Diffusion mode shifted via particle size refinement and increased defect concentration  bulk lattice limited → grain boundary limited ◦ Kinetic alteration  Rate of thermal energy application (°C/min)  Tube furnace, MWS, and SPS densification methods University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 10.
    Powder processing ◦ Particle size reduction ◦ Crystallite/grain size reduction ◦ Particle morphology changes  Green body formation ◦ Uniaxial pressure effect ◦ Uniaxial pressing of as rec, 1 hr and 4 hr SPEX powders  Sintering conditions ◦ Heat generation method, ramp rate, holding time ◦ Crystallite/grain size after sintering ◦ Relative density after sintering University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 11.
    ½” stainless steel ¼” stainless steel Ti-6Al-4V Stearic acid *Not to scale University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 12.
    200 µm 250 µm 100 µm As received PREP 1 hr SPEX milled 4 hr SPEX milled Avg. Dia. = 110 µm Avg. Dia. = 150 µm Avg. Dia. = 25 µm University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 13.
    10000 9000 8000 Ti 6-4 as rec powder 7000 Relative Intensity (a.u.) Ti 6-4 SPEX 2wt%/1hr 6000 Ti 6-4 SPEX 3wt%/1hr Ti 6-4 SPEX 3wt%/4hr 5000 Ti 6-4 SPEX 4wt%/1hr 4000 Ti 6-4 SPEX 4wt%/2hr Ti 6-4 SPEX 4wt%/3hr 3000 Ti 6-4 SPEX 4wt%/4hr Ti 6-4 SPEX 5wt%/1hr 2000 Ti 6-4 SPEX 5wt%/4hr 1000 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 2 Theta (°) University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 14.
    120 (1011) c 100 Ti 6-4 (002) Ti 6-4 (101) (0002) Crystallite Size (nm) 80 60 40 a2 20 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Milling Time (hr) a3 a1 University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 15.
    (1011) c 45 Ti 6-4 (002) 40 (0002) Ti 6-4 (101) 35 Crystallite Size (nm) 30 25 20 a2 15 10 5 0 2 3 4 5 6 a3 PCA Concentration (wt%) a1 University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 16.
    As received Ti-6Al-4VPREP powder 4 hr SPEX milled Ti-6Al-4V powder University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 17.
    300 MPa As receivedPREP powder 1 hr SPEX milled 4 hr SPEX milled 5 wt% PEG binder no binder no binder Dtheor = 50% Dtheor = 46% Dtheor = 58% University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 18.
    NO YES Heavily oxided Light surface throughout oxidation Low mechanical Polishes to mirror strength finish Useless for load High density bearing University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 19.
    Tube furnace sintering (RHS) ◦ Radiant heating of green body, from outside inward, through furnace atmosphere by electrical resistance through molybdenum heating elements  Spark plasma sintering ◦ Electrical resistance heating at contact point between each powder particle in the green body  Microwave sintering ◦ Dipole interaction of particle-pores within green body with microwave radiation University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 20.
    HOT COLD V University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 21.
    Sintering chamber ◦ Inert atmosphere ◦ Microwave transparent crucible (good dielectric) ◦ Particle-pore dipole interaction within green body COLD HOT University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 22.
  • 23.
    As received Sintered 2 hr Sintered 2 hr 300 MPa uniaxial @ 1100°C @ 1250°C Dtheor = 50% Dtheor = 75% Dtheor = >97% University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 24.
    15000 Ti 6-4 as rec tube - 1250C/2hr 14000 Ti 6-4 as rec tube - 1100C/2hr 13000 Ti 6-4 as rec SPS - 1000C/3min 12000 Ti 6-4 SPEX 4/4 tube - 1250C/2hr Relative Intensity (a.u.) 11000 Ti 6-4 SPEX 4/4 tube - 1100C/2hr 10000 Ti 6-4 SPEX 4/4 SPS - 1000C/3min 9000 Ti 6-4 SPEX 4/4 SPS - 600C/5min 8000 Ti 6-4 SPEX 4/4 MWS - 1250C/30min Ti 6-4 SPEX 4/4 MWS - 900C/1hr 7000 Ti 6-4 SPEX 4/1 tube - 1250C/2hr 6000 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 2 Theta (°) Ti 6-4 SPEX 4/1 tube - 1100C/2hr University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 25.
    250 Ti 6-4 (002) (1011) c 200 Ti 6-4 (101) (0002) Crystallite Size (nm) 150 100 a2 50 0 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Sinteirng Temperature (C) a3 a1 University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 26.
    Ti 6Al-4V asrec. Ti 6Al-4V as SPEX (1hr/4wt%) Ti 6Al-4V as SPEX (4hr/4wt%) 1250°C/2hr → 90% dense 1250°C/2hr → 75% dense 1250°C/2hr → 97% dense 500 µm 500 µm 500 µm 500 µm 500 µm 500 µm Ti 6Al-4V as rec. Ti 6Al-4V as SPEX Ti 6Al-4V as SPEX (4hr/4wt%) 1100°C/2hr → 78% dense (1hr/4wt%) 1100°C/2hr → 1100°C/2hr → 83% dense 60% dense University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 27.
    Ti-6Al-4V 4 hrSPEX, MWS at 900C Ti-6Al-4V 4 hr SPEX, MWS at 1250C for 1 hr (95% center, 80% edge) for 30 min (98% center, 81% edge) University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 28.
    3 Ti 6Al-4V as Rec 2.5 Ti 6Al-4V as SPEX 1000°C 2 Displacement (mm) 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Temperature (°C) Pressure Max Displacement Displacement Density Sample ID Decrease Onset Displacement Plateau Temp Onset Temp (°C) (g/cm3) Temp (°C) Temp (°C) (°C) Ti 6Al-4V as 550 620 800 880 4.31 rec Ti 6Al-4V as 350 350 600 750 4.27 SPEX 1000 University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 29.
    (a) Ti-6Al-4V as (b) Ti-6Al-4V 4 hr SPEX (c) Ti-6Al-4V 4 hr received, SPS @ 1000C as SPS @ 1000C for 3 SPEX as SPS @ 600C for 3 min, 99% min, 99% for 5 min, 96% University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 30.
    SPEX milled powder sinters @ lower temp than as received PREP powder ◦ Smaller particle size = shorter diffusion distance = shorter diffusion time ◦ Increase grain boundary area = rate limiting diffusion mechanism shift DL → Dg.b. Dg.b. >> DL  RHS to full theoretical density is possible ◦ Requires strict atmospheric control ◦ Heat penetration lag = longer sintering dwell times  MWS offers lower temperature, faster sintering than RHS ◦ Pressureless sintering = complex geometry retention is possible ◦ Heat emination lag = porous surface regions  SPS offers low temperature, rapid sintering ◦ Very high heating rates = rapid diffusion ◦ Uniaxial pressure from conductive die = complex geometry retention is difficult University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 31.
    Activation energy measurement ◦ Track density as a function of sintering conditions  Grain size analysis ◦ Monitor grain size as a function of sintering temperature  Mechanical properties ◦ Compressive and tensile strengths ◦ Rockwell C and microhardness  Biological properties ◦ Cell attachment (# per unit area) ◦ Cell spreading (lateral area coverage as a function of time in simulated body fluid)  Composite Ti-HA co-sintering studies ◦ SPS parameter optimization University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 32.
    2C/min 4C/min 8C/min 2C/min 700 700 700 800 800 800 150 Quench Temp (C) Relative Density (%) 100 900 900 900 50 1000 1000 1000 0 1100 1100 1100 600 800 1000 1200 1250 1250 1250 Quench Temperature (C) 4C/min 8C/min 150 150 Relative Density (%) Relative Density (%) 100 100 50 50 0 0 600 800 1000 1200 600 800 1000 1200 Quench Temperature (C) Quench Temperature (C) University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 33.
    4 hr SPEXpowder Sintering @ 900C Sintering @ 1250C Grain size vs. mechanical strength ? Grain size vs. activation energy barrier? Grain size vs. cell attachment and spreading? University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 34.
    Compressive strength ◦ Quasi-static using cross-head speed of 1,10,100 mm/min ◦ High strain rate using Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar at 300, 900 s-1 frequency  Tensile strength ◦ Strain until failure ◦ σYS , σUTS , E  Rockwell C and microhardness ◦ Compare to as received powder, commercially cast or forged products and between each other University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 35.
    (a) HA asSPS @ 1000C (b) Ti-6Al-4V 4 hr SPEX (c) Ti-6Al-4V 4 hr SPEX for 3 min, 99% (90 vol%) + HA (10 vol%) (75 vol%) + HA (25 vol%) as SPS @ 96% as SPS @ 1000C for 3 min, 83% University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 36.
  • 37.
    Funding ◦ United States National Science Foundation contract CBET- 0930365  Supervision ◦ Dr Leon Shaw  Instrumentation ◦ Dr. Claude Estournes (SPS at CIRIMAT in France), Dr. Ashraf Imam (MWS at NRL in D.C.), Jack Gromek (XRD), Roger Ristau and Lichun Zhang (TEM/SEM), Bob Bouchard and Matt Bebee (SPEX vial and die fabrication)  Support ◦ Monica & Ling (HA synthesis and biostudies) and Girije Marathe (quartz tube sealing) as well as the rest of my groupmates and fellow grad students in MSE/IMS University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 38.
    [1] Hennig, R., Lenosky, T., Trinkle, D., Rudin, S., Wilkins, J. "Classical potential describes martensitic phase transformations between the alpha, beta, and omega titanium phases," Physical Review B, 78,054121, 2008.  [2] Kubaschewski O., Wainwright C., and Kirby F.J., “The Heats of Formation in the Vanadium-Titanium- Aluminium System,” J. Inst. Met., 89, 1960, 139-144.  [3] Honma BERES 7 Series Driver, honmagolf.com, 2010.  [4] Solid Grade 5 Titanium, TNG Body Jewlery, 2012.  [5] Deutsch, A., “Bike review: Merlin works CR 6/4,” Brooklyn Arches Cycling, 2012.  [6] Titanium dental implants, Naomi Dental, 2011  [7] Total hip replacement, defectivejoints.com, 2011  [8] Shaw, L., “Rapid prototyping of functionally graded orthopedic implants via the slurry mixing and dispensing process,” NSF proposal submitted 2009.  [9] What’s SPS, “Principles and mechanism of the SPS process,” Fuji Electronic Industrial Co. University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 39.
  • 40.
    Armstrong starting powder ◦ Low apparent density (~5%) ◦ Sponge morphology with high SSA  Slurry preparation ◦ Stable suspension ◦ Proper pH and viscosity  Freeform 3D printing ◦ Tip diameter = slurry droplet size  Lateral and layer thickness resolution  Software development to allow for composition gradient from core to surface ◦ Must accommodate change in composition within each z-slice  Mechanical and biological properties of functionally graded component ◦ Ti-HA composites via SPS  Bioactivity as a function of surface roughness ◦ Cell # and lateral spreading as a function of SiC scratch width  Surface functionalization ◦ Macropores filled with aerogel particles containing growth hormone or antibiotic University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 41.
    SiC paper vs. Ti-6Al-4V University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013
  • 42.
    Antibiotic or pain relieving aerogel capsules University of Connecticut - IMS 4/2/2013