This document contains a rubric to assess student group presentations. The rubric contains four levels of achievement (beginning, developing, accomplished, and exemplary) across several criteria including working in groups, quality of information presented, and classroom presentation skills. For each criteria, the rubric describes the characteristics that would qualify for each achievement level score from 5% to 30%. The document provides a tool to evaluate group work and presentations.

1. Assessing the other groups
group _____ for group ____
Circle the appropriate descriptor. (Κύκλωσε την καταλληλότερη περιγραφή)
1 Beginning 2 Developing 3 Accomplished 4 Exemplary Score
Working in
groups
5%
Group
members
rarely
support the
effort of
others. Group
members
cannot work
together.
10%
Group
members
often
support the
effort of
others. Not
all group
members
participate in
the project.
20%
Group members
usually support
the effort of
others. Very
few cooperation
issues.
30%
Group
members
always
support the
effort of
others. Group
members
work
together
harmoniously.
30%
Quality of
information
for the
country
presentation
5%
Information
gathered has
little or
nothing to do
with the
questions
posed.
Important
information is
missing.
10%
Information
gathered
provides
answers to
main
questions,
but no
details are
given.
Satisfactory
language use.
15%
Information
gathered
provides
answers to main
questions along
with 1-2
supporting
details. Very
good language
use.
20%
Information
gathered
provides
answers to
the all
research
questions
along with
several
supporting
details.
Excellent use
of language.
20%
Quality of
information
for the
castle
presentation
5%
Information
gathered has
little or
nothing to do
with the
questions
posed.
Important
information is
missing.
10%
Information
gathered
provides
answers to
main
questions,
but no
details are
given.
Satisfactory
language use.
15%
Information
gathered
provides
answers to main
questions along
with 1-2
supporting
details. Very
good language
use.
20%
Information
gathered
provides
answers to
the all
research
questions
along with
several
supporting
details.
Excellent use
20%

2. of language.
Classroom
presentation
5%
No eye
contact.
Cannot be
heard.
Cannot be
understood.
10%
Some eye
contact.
Clear and
audible
speech most
of the time.
Understood
only a part of
the
presentation.
20%
Good eye
contact.
Clear speech,
facial and body
language.
Understood
most part of
the
presentation.
30%
Very good eye
contact.
Clear speech,
facial and
body
language. The
audience is
engaged.
30%