The document discusses banning cell phone use while driving and provides details on the following: - The primary idea is banning cell phone use in cars and reasons for the ban. - The sections and headings clearly represent the ideas being communicated. - Details included are how to ban cell phones in cars and reasons for the ban. - The writing is clear and easy to understand with no errors noted.

1. Peer Review Exercise # 4
1. What is the primary idea of the content in the articles?
The primary idea is that how to ban the use cell phones in cars and reasons for banning cell phone use
when driving. These contents explain that present situation which people use cell phones in
operation. In addition, they explain cell phone software that restricts the use of the devices in cars.
2. Do you think the individual sections and headings in the document (articles) clearly represent
the idea that was communicated. Explain the reasons behind your comments.
When I read these documents, I think that these documents clearly represent the idea that is
communicated. Because one document explains that how to ban the cell phones in cars that detail the
procedures in individual sections and headings. Also, another content is written in a wide variety of
laws that people ban using cell phones when driving and school. Therefore, it is easy to understand
these documents.
3. What details are included in the articles?
These documents include these details that how to ban the use cell phones in cars and reasons for
banning cell phone use when driving. In addition, one document includes the detail that solution to
the problems what people use cell phones for driving. Additionally, another document includes the
detail that problems caused by using cell phones when driving and so on.
4. Was there anything that was confusing? If so, what is it?
When I read these documents, I am not confusing. Because these documents are easy to understand
these contents and author's ideas. One document writes the way and procedures that how to ban the
use cell phones in cars. Also, another document writes these reasons and problems that caused by
using cell phones when driving. Therefore, I am easy to understand these document.
5. What is good about the writing? Why is it good?
These documents are written reasons and the way that banning cell phones use in operation well.
Because these documents explanation can accept these reasons and the way for people who is reads
these documents for the first time. Additionally, one document explains procedure that the way for
bunning cell phone use when driving. Therefore, I think that these documents are good.
6. Are there any errors that need to be corrected?
I think that these documents do not have any errors that need to corrected when I read these
documents. Because these documents are easy to understand the present situation which people use
cell phones in operation for people read these documents for the first time. Additionally, I think that
these documents ideas are clearly and simple to understand.
7. What specific suggestions for improving the articles can you make?
I make a suggestion that these documents add more concrete examples. By doing this, these
documents go on to be easy to understand these contents. In addition, these contents are simple to
understand importance of laws and the present situation which people use cell phones in operation.
This way results in an amelioration of these documents.
8. Identify three basic differences between how your group would author a similar document
and how this author authored it (as you see it in the link).
There are three difference points between my group and these authors. First difference point is
perspective. Because these authors write these documents at a wide variety of perspectives. Second
difference point is document style. This document autor Amanda C. Kooser is described

2. way which how to ban the use of cell phones in cars step by step. Third difference point is
authority. Another document author Nancy Kerstetter writes the present situation. By doing this, this
document mount up authority. These things are basic difference points between my group and these
authors.