Optimizing Biopharmaceutical Processing
                   by Value - Added Services




Optimization – Two Prong Approach
1. during development & process scaling

     Discovery        Pre Clinical         Phase I           Phase II         Phase III        Commerical




 2. of an existing process step & chain
   Upstream           Fermentation |                           Purification                       Form | Fill
                     Cell culture tech.




 Media           Bioreactors    Cell harvesting Concentration Target           Virus removal    Sterile filtration
 -Filtration                    Contaminant                    purification
 -Media bags                    removal                    Buffer prep | Filtration




                                                                                                                     1
1. Optimization Potential in the Development & Scaling Phase

      Discovery      Pre Clinical         Phase I   Phase II    Phase III    Commerical


         Sequence       Route           Process      Process      Pilot
         Selection   Development      Development    Scaleup     Batches     Commerical
            mg            g             1-10 kg     10-50 kg   100-300 kg

                                    IND                                 BLA/NDA

    Prerequisites:
           Up & down scalability
           Identical design & configuration of either equipment or process
           Defined & repeatable & documented test methodologies/results
           Constant material composition in all scales
           Proper time frame definition & hand-over to next phase




Scale- Up/Down Opportunities
Equipment:                          Examples of adequate scalability:

Pumps

Fermentation

Centrifugation

Purification

Filtration

Valves

Concentration




                                                                                          2
Why is Scalability Needed ?

     Smooth scale-up from development phase, down from process
     scale

     Ease of validation, due to the utilization of existing development
     phase results

     Optimization of processes and improved equipment choice

     Performance evaluation of comparable process equipment

     Reduction of product losses during testing




Scale-Up/Down – Important Factors

       Equipment requires linear scaling (performance predictions)

       Equipment design criteria requires to be similar or equal
       (reproducible results)

       Material and components within equipment should not change
       with scaling (validation & extractable issues)

       Process parameters need to be kept (minimum variability)

       Process design should stay constant (reproducibility &
       comparability)




                                                                          3
Involvement of Value – Added Services - Examples
                                                       Quality system design

                                                                               Training
         Equipment design & testing



      Discovery   Pre Clinical       Phase I        Phase II     Phase III     Commerical




    New innovative                    Filing support                 Validation services
    technologies
                                               Process design support
                                               Process step integration




Example Filtration – Equipment design & testing
                                                                             Important Factor:
                                                                             Flow per cm² has
                                                                             to be constant
                  Flow per filter cm²
                  Flow per filter element




                            Filtration area (cm2)




                                                                                                 4
Development Phase Optimization – Potential Savings

    Biopharmaceutical equipment development focus on small scales:

          $ Reduction of multiple validation steps/studies – cost reduction,
            faster time-to-market

          $ Opportunity for process optimization - yield enhancement

          $ Reduction of product losses during development – cost reduction,
            enhanced test numbers

          $ Excelleration of regulatory compliance/filing – faster time-to-
            market




2. Optimization Potential of an Existing Process Step or Chain
   Upstream          Fermentation |                          Purification                      Form | Fill
                    Cell culture tech.




  Media         Bioreactors   Cell harvesting Concentration Target           Virus removal   Sterile filtration
  -Filtration                 Contaminant                    purification
  -Media bags                 removal                    Buffer prep | Filtration


    Prerequisites:
          Open minded approach to new technologies and improvements
          Up & down scalability
          Appropriate test procedures which reflect large scale results
          Possibilities of process equipment integration
          Validation support & services




                                                                                                                  5
Examples of Technology Changes
                           Time Frame – a Drug Development Cycle

                                                   3 x higher flow
                                              2-3 x higher throughput
                                                 much less leachables
                                              reliably integrity testable
                                               higher thermal strength




                                                 higher flow rates
                                               wider retention rating
                                              higher thermal strength
                                                easy, faster cleaning
                                                  full automation




                                                  higher sensitivity
                                                no user interference
                                                high user friendliness
                                                   full automation
                                                reliable data logging




Examples – Savings by Process Optimization of Sterilizing Filter

                                                                        140
                                                                        120
                                                 Flow Rate (l/min)




                                                                        100
    Sizing/Dead-Volumes                                                  80
    (flow rate/throughput enhancements                                   60
     reduce the required equipment size,                                 40
     i.e. flush volumes, dead-volumes etc.                               20
     annual potential savings and/or                                         0
     revenue enhancement of $ mil)                                                    0.5            1              1.5                2             2.5
                                                                                                         Differential Pressure (bar)

                                                                                            1. Generation         2. Generation            3. Generation


                                                                                        IgF Adsorption Different Membrane Materials

                                                                        90

    Adsorptivity                                                        80

                                                                        70
    (difference between 85 % down to 25 %
                                                     IgF Recovery (%)




                                                                        60
     per 10“ filter cartridge; depending on                             50

     the drug product:                                                  40

     losses of $ 30 to > $ 65.000                                       30

     per filtration run)                                                20

                                                                        10

                                                                         0
                                                                                 CA          PVDF         PES1         PES2        PES3            PES4




                                                                                                                                                           6
Examples – Savings by Process Optimization of Tanks/Mixing


    Disposable Bags
    (low or no capital investment, low storage space needs,
     no cleaning, i.e. no down-time, higher capacity utilization,
     multi-product use posibilities, less man hours, less cleaning
     solution costs - one tank cleaning can take up to 6 hours
     and costs up to $ 10,000 per tank total)




    Disposable Mixing
    (lower capital investment and storage needs due to the
     elimination of multiple sets of tanks (one for use, one in
     cleaning), no cleaning , i.e. no down-time, higher capacity
    utilization, multi-product use posibilities, less man hours, less
    cleaning solution costs – one more batch per week due to
    higher capacity utilization adds tens of millions of revenue)




Validation Support – Example – Extractable Testing


   Any polymeric system requires
    leachable/extractable testing
    with the actual product or a                                                                                  Gamma-Bag Extraction with DI-Water at 50°C

    model solvent under process                                                                              22
                                                                                                                   Acetic Acid
                                                                                                                                                                        22
                                                                        TOC [mg/l] / Conductivity [µS/cm ]




                                                                                                             20                                                         20

             conditions
                                                                                                                   TOC
                                                                                                             18                                                         18
                                                                                                                   pH
                                                                                                                                                                             pH / Acetic Acid [mg/ l]




                                                                                                             16                                                         16
                                                                                                                   Conductivity
                                                                                                             14                                                         14

                                                                                                             12                                                         12

                                                                                                             10                                                         10

                                                                                                              8                                                         8

                                                                                                              6                                                         6

                                                                                                              4                                                         4

                                                                                                              2                                                         2


         Value-Added Service                                                                                  0
                                                                                                                  Blank           24h 50°C   48h 50°C       120h 50°C
                                                                                                                                                                        0


                                                                                                                          Extraction Time and Temperature
                CONFIDENCE®




                                                                                                                                                                                                        7
Downstream Systems Integration
 From Fermentation to Clarification to Concentration to Purification




                             Source: Sartorius

         Source: Sartorius




                             Source: Kendro/Carr




                                                                                          Source: Sartorius
                                                   Source: Sartorius




Examples - Downstream Integration

 From Fermentation to Clarification to Concentration to Purification




   Source: Sartorius




                                                                       Source: Bayer AG




                                                                                                              8
Involvement of Value – Added Services - Examples

                               Process integration                                 Optimization services




   Upstream           Fermentation |                           Purification                      Form | Fill
                     Cell culture tech.




  Media          Bioreactors    Cell harvesting Concentration Target           Virus removal   Sterile filtration
  -Filtration                   Contaminant                    purification
  -Media bags                   removal                    Buffer prep | Filtration




           Filing support
                                                       Validation services
                Training




                                               Conclusion
        Optimization is a two prong approach starting in the development
        phases and continuing in existing processes

        Optimization requires appropriate equipment scalability to perform
        multiple trials at low product losses and requirements

        Optimization trials require to be defined to be able to determine the
        realistic needs; e.g. a 47 mm disc trial can only be used as an indicator
        trial and has to be verified and assured

        Optimization properly performed can create not only savings, but
        especially additional revenue; real world example – 1 batch more per
        week means $ 1.2 bio/year

        Optimization tasks & projects can and should be supported by the
        value-added service of the vendor




                                                                                                                    9

PDA Virtual Training Optimizing Processes 03 2006

  • 1.
    Optimizing Biopharmaceutical Processing by Value - Added Services Optimization – Two Prong Approach 1. during development & process scaling Discovery Pre Clinical Phase I Phase II Phase III Commerical 2. of an existing process step & chain Upstream Fermentation | Purification Form | Fill Cell culture tech. Media Bioreactors Cell harvesting Concentration Target Virus removal Sterile filtration -Filtration Contaminant purification -Media bags removal Buffer prep | Filtration 1
  • 2.
    1. Optimization Potentialin the Development & Scaling Phase Discovery Pre Clinical Phase I Phase II Phase III Commerical Sequence Route Process Process Pilot Selection Development Development Scaleup Batches Commerical mg g 1-10 kg 10-50 kg 100-300 kg IND BLA/NDA Prerequisites: Up & down scalability Identical design & configuration of either equipment or process Defined & repeatable & documented test methodologies/results Constant material composition in all scales Proper time frame definition & hand-over to next phase Scale- Up/Down Opportunities Equipment: Examples of adequate scalability: Pumps Fermentation Centrifugation Purification Filtration Valves Concentration 2
  • 3.
    Why is ScalabilityNeeded ? Smooth scale-up from development phase, down from process scale Ease of validation, due to the utilization of existing development phase results Optimization of processes and improved equipment choice Performance evaluation of comparable process equipment Reduction of product losses during testing Scale-Up/Down – Important Factors Equipment requires linear scaling (performance predictions) Equipment design criteria requires to be similar or equal (reproducible results) Material and components within equipment should not change with scaling (validation & extractable issues) Process parameters need to be kept (minimum variability) Process design should stay constant (reproducibility & comparability) 3
  • 4.
    Involvement of Value– Added Services - Examples Quality system design Training Equipment design & testing Discovery Pre Clinical Phase I Phase II Phase III Commerical New innovative Filing support Validation services technologies Process design support Process step integration Example Filtration – Equipment design & testing Important Factor: Flow per cm² has to be constant Flow per filter cm² Flow per filter element Filtration area (cm2) 4
  • 5.
    Development Phase Optimization– Potential Savings Biopharmaceutical equipment development focus on small scales: $ Reduction of multiple validation steps/studies – cost reduction, faster time-to-market $ Opportunity for process optimization - yield enhancement $ Reduction of product losses during development – cost reduction, enhanced test numbers $ Excelleration of regulatory compliance/filing – faster time-to- market 2. Optimization Potential of an Existing Process Step or Chain Upstream Fermentation | Purification Form | Fill Cell culture tech. Media Bioreactors Cell harvesting Concentration Target Virus removal Sterile filtration -Filtration Contaminant purification -Media bags removal Buffer prep | Filtration Prerequisites: Open minded approach to new technologies and improvements Up & down scalability Appropriate test procedures which reflect large scale results Possibilities of process equipment integration Validation support & services 5
  • 6.
    Examples of TechnologyChanges Time Frame – a Drug Development Cycle 3 x higher flow 2-3 x higher throughput much less leachables reliably integrity testable higher thermal strength higher flow rates wider retention rating higher thermal strength easy, faster cleaning full automation higher sensitivity no user interference high user friendliness full automation reliable data logging Examples – Savings by Process Optimization of Sterilizing Filter 140 120 Flow Rate (l/min) 100 Sizing/Dead-Volumes 80 (flow rate/throughput enhancements 60 reduce the required equipment size, 40 i.e. flush volumes, dead-volumes etc. 20 annual potential savings and/or 0 revenue enhancement of $ mil) 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Differential Pressure (bar) 1. Generation 2. Generation 3. Generation IgF Adsorption Different Membrane Materials 90 Adsorptivity 80 70 (difference between 85 % down to 25 % IgF Recovery (%) 60 per 10“ filter cartridge; depending on 50 the drug product: 40 losses of $ 30 to > $ 65.000 30 per filtration run) 20 10 0 CA PVDF PES1 PES2 PES3 PES4 6
  • 7.
    Examples – Savingsby Process Optimization of Tanks/Mixing Disposable Bags (low or no capital investment, low storage space needs, no cleaning, i.e. no down-time, higher capacity utilization, multi-product use posibilities, less man hours, less cleaning solution costs - one tank cleaning can take up to 6 hours and costs up to $ 10,000 per tank total) Disposable Mixing (lower capital investment and storage needs due to the elimination of multiple sets of tanks (one for use, one in cleaning), no cleaning , i.e. no down-time, higher capacity utilization, multi-product use posibilities, less man hours, less cleaning solution costs – one more batch per week due to higher capacity utilization adds tens of millions of revenue) Validation Support – Example – Extractable Testing Any polymeric system requires leachable/extractable testing with the actual product or a Gamma-Bag Extraction with DI-Water at 50°C model solvent under process 22 Acetic Acid 22 TOC [mg/l] / Conductivity [µS/cm ] 20 20 conditions TOC 18 18 pH pH / Acetic Acid [mg/ l] 16 16 Conductivity 14 14 12 12 10 10 8 8 6 6 4 4 2 2 Value-Added Service 0 Blank 24h 50°C 48h 50°C 120h 50°C 0 Extraction Time and Temperature CONFIDENCE® 7
  • 8.
    Downstream Systems Integration From Fermentation to Clarification to Concentration to Purification Source: Sartorius Source: Sartorius Source: Kendro/Carr Source: Sartorius Source: Sartorius Examples - Downstream Integration From Fermentation to Clarification to Concentration to Purification Source: Sartorius Source: Bayer AG 8
  • 9.
    Involvement of Value– Added Services - Examples Process integration Optimization services Upstream Fermentation | Purification Form | Fill Cell culture tech. Media Bioreactors Cell harvesting Concentration Target Virus removal Sterile filtration -Filtration Contaminant purification -Media bags removal Buffer prep | Filtration Filing support Validation services Training Conclusion Optimization is a two prong approach starting in the development phases and continuing in existing processes Optimization requires appropriate equipment scalability to perform multiple trials at low product losses and requirements Optimization trials require to be defined to be able to determine the realistic needs; e.g. a 47 mm disc trial can only be used as an indicator trial and has to be verified and assured Optimization properly performed can create not only savings, but especially additional revenue; real world example – 1 batch more per week means $ 1.2 bio/year Optimization tasks & projects can and should be supported by the value-added service of the vendor 9