24 individuals from 13 countries met at the Rockefeller Foundation’s Bellagio Center in Italy to discuss lessons learned from payments for watershed services (PWS) schemes. The goal was to consider how experiences with PWS schemes could improve watershed management efficiency. Participants included practitioners implementing PWS, researchers studying PWS, and investors in PWS. They had experience with 9 PWS schemes and knowledge of 15 more. The resulting "Bellagio Conversations" aimed to shed light on important PWS issues and encourage others to address PWS opportunities and challenges. Experiences with PWS to date demonstrate variations in conditionality, payment forms, and government involvement, while interest in the PWS concept grows.
This document summarizes the L.A. Supportive Housing Recovery Initiative launched by CSH and its partners to assist nonprofit developers experiencing financial difficulties from state budget crises and the tightened credit market. The initiative will provide grants, low-interest loans up to $1.5 million through a Project Completion Loan Fund, and technical assistance to complete supportive housing projects impacted by the economic crisis. The goal is to position the permanent supportive housing industry for long-term viability and help nonprofits continue their efforts to end homelessness in Los Angeles.
How has MS spent its disaster recovery CDBG funds? What percentage has gone towards lower-income storm victims? What would need to happen to meet Congressional goal?
Clean Rivers, Clean Lake 8 -- Opening Remarks -- Nancy FrankSweet Water
This document summarizes the 2012 status report of the Greater Milwaukee Watersheds initiative. It provides statistics on the sizes and lengths of the main watersheds in the region. It then outlines Sweet Water's goals to make measurable progress on water quality by focusing on land use practices, leveraging funding, recommending policies, and ensuring cost-effective projects. The summary describes some of Sweet Water's outreach efforts and projects to date to work towards these goals, including developing restoration plans, implementing projects, and providing mini-grants. It concludes by looking ahead to Sweet Water's future strategic planning and efforts to further collaboration between partners.
A presentation about comprehensive wastewater planning at the town level. Presented by Dr. Robert Duncanson, Chatham Health & Environment Director, during the Buzzards Bay Coalition's 2013 Decision Makers Workshop series. Learn more at www.savebuzzardsbay.org/DecisionMakers
This document discusses GIZ's experiences with scaling up development cooperation projects. It outlines a two-phase process undertaken by GIZ to integrate scaling up into their planning and evaluation processes. Phase I involved analyzing best practices and updating guidance documents. Phase II includes strategically evaluating projects and learning events. The document also presents lessons learned on success factors for scaling up, including having a long-term vision, stakeholder ownership, a multi-level approach, effective evaluation of pilots, standards, scaling up structures, communication, and sufficient time and budget. Examples from GIZ water and coastal management projects in Kenya and Vietnam demonstrate approaches to horizontal and vertical scaling up.
This document outlines a project to develop recommendations for community resilience hubs (CRHs) in vulnerable Washington D.C. neighborhoods. It defines key terms, establishes the need for additional community resources during extreme weather events, and outlines the project's objectives to identify CRH characteristics, develop an establishment framework, and conduct a pilot study. The framework involves selecting vulnerable communities and facilities, evaluating suitability, and identifying upgrade needs. The pilot study applies this framework to a D.C. neighborhood to analyze effectiveness and lessons learned.
Irrigation futures - Regional Partnerships address water security in wester...Christina Parmionova
Regional partnerships address water security in Western Sydney
This article by Basant Maheshwari and Bruce Simmons featured in the Irrigation Australia Journal, Spring 2009, Volume 24, No. 3.
The Cooperative Research Centre for Irrigation Futures System Harmonisation program has developed a project titled Water and Irrigation Strategy Enhancement through Regional Partnerships (WISER) to establish a system harmonisation process in Western Sydney, NSW. The project is about working with regional irrigation partners to increase profitability and reduce the environmental footprint of irrigation systems. Here we provide an overview of the System Harmonisation Program and a case study of the WISER project in Western Sydney.
Costing sustainable services: the life-cycle cost approachIRC
This document discusses using a life-cycle cost approach to provide sustainable water and sanitation services. It notes that as coverage increases, costs shift from being capital expenditure dominated to recurrent and maintenance costs dominated, entering a "danger zone" where services are at risk of not being sustained. The document presents examples of analyzing service levels, costs by category from an NGO project in Uganda, and mean household investment in water sources in different areas. It concludes that a life-cycle cost approach allows for more effective planning, financing, and comparison of delivery models to support long-term sustainable services.
This document summarizes the L.A. Supportive Housing Recovery Initiative launched by CSH and its partners to assist nonprofit developers experiencing financial difficulties from state budget crises and the tightened credit market. The initiative will provide grants, low-interest loans up to $1.5 million through a Project Completion Loan Fund, and technical assistance to complete supportive housing projects impacted by the economic crisis. The goal is to position the permanent supportive housing industry for long-term viability and help nonprofits continue their efforts to end homelessness in Los Angeles.
How has MS spent its disaster recovery CDBG funds? What percentage has gone towards lower-income storm victims? What would need to happen to meet Congressional goal?
Clean Rivers, Clean Lake 8 -- Opening Remarks -- Nancy FrankSweet Water
This document summarizes the 2012 status report of the Greater Milwaukee Watersheds initiative. It provides statistics on the sizes and lengths of the main watersheds in the region. It then outlines Sweet Water's goals to make measurable progress on water quality by focusing on land use practices, leveraging funding, recommending policies, and ensuring cost-effective projects. The summary describes some of Sweet Water's outreach efforts and projects to date to work towards these goals, including developing restoration plans, implementing projects, and providing mini-grants. It concludes by looking ahead to Sweet Water's future strategic planning and efforts to further collaboration between partners.
A presentation about comprehensive wastewater planning at the town level. Presented by Dr. Robert Duncanson, Chatham Health & Environment Director, during the Buzzards Bay Coalition's 2013 Decision Makers Workshop series. Learn more at www.savebuzzardsbay.org/DecisionMakers
This document discusses GIZ's experiences with scaling up development cooperation projects. It outlines a two-phase process undertaken by GIZ to integrate scaling up into their planning and evaluation processes. Phase I involved analyzing best practices and updating guidance documents. Phase II includes strategically evaluating projects and learning events. The document also presents lessons learned on success factors for scaling up, including having a long-term vision, stakeholder ownership, a multi-level approach, effective evaluation of pilots, standards, scaling up structures, communication, and sufficient time and budget. Examples from GIZ water and coastal management projects in Kenya and Vietnam demonstrate approaches to horizontal and vertical scaling up.
This document outlines a project to develop recommendations for community resilience hubs (CRHs) in vulnerable Washington D.C. neighborhoods. It defines key terms, establishes the need for additional community resources during extreme weather events, and outlines the project's objectives to identify CRH characteristics, develop an establishment framework, and conduct a pilot study. The framework involves selecting vulnerable communities and facilities, evaluating suitability, and identifying upgrade needs. The pilot study applies this framework to a D.C. neighborhood to analyze effectiveness and lessons learned.
Irrigation futures - Regional Partnerships address water security in wester...Christina Parmionova
Regional partnerships address water security in Western Sydney
This article by Basant Maheshwari and Bruce Simmons featured in the Irrigation Australia Journal, Spring 2009, Volume 24, No. 3.
The Cooperative Research Centre for Irrigation Futures System Harmonisation program has developed a project titled Water and Irrigation Strategy Enhancement through Regional Partnerships (WISER) to establish a system harmonisation process in Western Sydney, NSW. The project is about working with regional irrigation partners to increase profitability and reduce the environmental footprint of irrigation systems. Here we provide an overview of the System Harmonisation Program and a case study of the WISER project in Western Sydney.
Costing sustainable services: the life-cycle cost approachIRC
This document discusses using a life-cycle cost approach to provide sustainable water and sanitation services. It notes that as coverage increases, costs shift from being capital expenditure dominated to recurrent and maintenance costs dominated, entering a "danger zone" where services are at risk of not being sustained. The document presents examples of analyzing service levels, costs by category from an NGO project in Uganda, and mean household investment in water sources in different areas. It concludes that a life-cycle cost approach allows for more effective planning, financing, and comparison of delivery models to support long-term sustainable services.
1. The document outlines an agenda for a presentation that includes a video, discussions of global challenges, the LIFELINK concept and business models, sustainability, transparency, and learnings.
2. Key global challenges mentioned are poverty, resource and food crises, as well as climate change issues that could threaten global security.
3. The LIFELINK concept provides clean water access through a system that transfers water credits to users' water keys via a mobile banking and internet-connected database system.
The document summarizes efforts to build consensus around a plan to clean up decades of sediment pollution in San Diego Bay. A strategic campaign engaged elected officials, created positive media coverage, and built a broad coalition of supporters including labor groups, businesses, and community organizations. On November 9th, 2011, this diverse coalition provided testimony supporting the middle-ground cleanup plan at a public hearing. As a result, the regional water board approved the "monumental" and "historic" bay cleanup plan to address a decades-long environmental issue in the area.
Climate change adaptation in SADC: a strategy for the Water SectorBertrand Meinier
This document summarizes a workshop on adapting to climate change in transboundary water basins in Southern Africa. It outlines that the region will get hotter and drier, with more variable precipitation patterns and more extreme floods and droughts. It describes the process used to develop a strategy for climate change adaptation in the water sector, including consultation with ministers, experts, and donors. The strategy focuses on no-regrets interventions in water governance, management, and infrastructure development to build resilience.
This document provides guidance from the Pacific Institute on water-related collective action. It outlines five key elements for preparing and implementing collective action: 1) articulating water challenges and action areas, 2) characterizing interested stakeholders, 3) selecting a level of engagement, 4) preparing for collective action, and 5) implementation, refinement and evolution. It also provides examples of potential collective action areas from the Water Action Hub and how to connect actions to underlying causes of water issues. The guidance is intended to help companies new to external engagement properly scope options and have solid footing for external discussions on water-related collective action.
The UN Global Compact: CEO Water Mandate and the Water Action Hub. Jason Morrison, Technical Director of CEO Water Mandate. International Annual UN-Water Zaragoza Conference 2012/2013. Preparing for the 2013 International Year. Water Cooperation: Making it Happen! 8-10 January 2013
SUCCESSFUL LAND USE PLANNING EDUCATION ADDRESSING MULTIPLE JURISDICTIONSnacaa
Valuable partnerships were formed to address complex multi-jurisdictional land use planning issues in Virginia. An educational workshop was attended by 36 representatives from 5 municipalities. Presentations by state experts covered emerging issues and land conservation programs. An expert panel discussion allowed participants to discuss locality-specific concerns. As a result, counties have begun adopting land conservation practices and incorporating smart growth concepts into plans.
This document provides an overview and introduction to a briefing kit focused on demonstrating how recommendations from the World Commission on Dams (WCD) have been implemented in actions and policies around the world. The WCD conducted a comprehensive, two-year review of large dam projects and concluded that while dams have contributed to development, they have often come at unacceptable social and environmental costs. The briefing kit highlights categories of WCD recommendations and examples of how policies, regulations, and projects have reflected these recommendations in areas such as public acceptance, environmental impacts, benefits sharing, and compliance. However, it notes that full implementation of WCD guidelines remains uneven.
Sydney Water Corp Customer Council Annual Providing Advice, Feedback And As...Christina Parmionova
The Corporate Customer Council provides advice and feedback to Sydney Water on its operations. In the past year, the Council discussed Sydney Water's desalination and recycling projects, water pressure management program, and private sewer rehabilitation communications. The Council also advised Sydney Water on its marketing campaigns and messaging around water conservation and recycling.
This document discusses several case studies from the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF) that resulted in outcomes. It focuses on a case study in Peru around the development of benefit sharing mechanisms for water resources in the Cañete River watershed. Over 8-10 years, CPWF Phase 1 and 2 research contributed to changes in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding water valuation, payment targeting, and legal reforms that enabled the drafting of national ecosystem services legislation in Peru. The document also briefly mentions case studies on slash and mulch agriculture in Central America, urban wastewater use in West Africa, and a precursor project in Zimbabwe that addressed challenges in goat farming through innovations like organized auctions.
The document discusses the science of sustainability and its implications for society. It notes that sustainability means meeting current needs without compromising future generations' ability to meet their needs. It then examines issues like population growth, resource consumption, climate change, and their impacts on areas like food, water, energy, and conflicts. Finally, it argues that major changes are needed across all parts of society if humanity is to transition to a sustainable model.
Water and sanitation service models for the urban poor: Defining stakeholder relations, achieving sustainable finance
Side Event WEDC 06/07/2011. Session organized by WSUP Cranfield University and BPD Water and Sanitation
October 2009 marks the first anniversary for the Sustainability Committee of the Downtown Los Angeles Neighborhood Council. This document outlines some of our work in our first year.
The document discusses the LiveDiverse project which aims to improve livelihoods for local people while protecting biodiversity in developing countries. The project takes place across several sites in Europe and developing regions of South Africa, Costa Rica, Vietnam, India, and Scotland. The overall strategy involves creating a knowledge base on biodiversity and livelihood vulnerabilities, identifying areas at high risk, developing scenarios, and formulating policy recommendations. The central issues examined are agricultural systems, competition over water and dams, rural communities, alternative livelihoods, legal/policy systems, human settlements, and cultural traditions at the biodiversity and livelihood interface.
The document discusses strategies for transitioning cities to become more water sensitive and sustainable, highlighting the need to adopt diverse water sources, use green infrastructure to provide ecosystem services, and build social and institutional capacity. It also outlines Brisbane City Council's efforts to become a more water smart city through their healthy waterways program which aims to improve water quality, enhance riparian zones, and allocate resources effectively to priority catchments.
This document proposes a benefit sharing paradigm for REDD+ in Indonesia that views communities as co-owners of projects rather than disturbed neighbors. It suggests defining benefits more broadly than just cash distributions, to include well-being, sustainability, and fulfilled social needs derived from carbon as well as other ecosystem services. The document outlines identifying various beneficiaries like communities, developers, and governments and their potential benefits, and distributing benefits through existing and new channels as part of a green development plan while ensuring community access, safeguards, and transparency. Key challenges mentioned are developing legal frameworks, defining ownership and beneficiaries, increasing capacity for management, and preventing corruption.
The Kailali Disaster Risk Reduction Initiatives II (KDRRI II) project aimed to reduce disaster risks for over 24,000 individuals in Kailali District, Nepal. The project worked with communities to establish early warning systems, conduct disaster preparedness planning, implement small-scale mitigation measures, and engage youth in disaster response training. These efforts helped communities successfully evacuate and limit losses when severe floods struck the region in 2008. Building on the success of phase I, KDRRI II expanded these activities to additional communities along the Kandara River to increase resilience to flooding.
Advocacy by the Ombudsman enabling Water ReformsBlancheCotlear
This case study explains the role the national Ombudsman played in facilitating the dialogue between water users and the national regulator for the water reform and improvements in the regulation.
This document discusses payments for watershed services (PWS) and summarizes key discussions from a meeting in Bellagio, Italy in 2007. It defines PWS as voluntary transactions between service buyers and sellers to manage land in ways that protect watershed services. The meeting brought together practitioners, researchers, and investors with experience in PWS schemes. They discussed lessons learned from global experiences to improve watershed management efficiency. The document also summarizes two common types of PWS schemes - user-financed schemes negotiated between buyers and sellers, and government-financed schemes where the state pays on behalf of users.
This document summarizes research on quantifying and predicting the impacts of forest plantation water use. The research aims to improve models for predicting plantation water use over seasons to help managers make informed land use decisions. It also seeks to estimate water use across regions with plantations to predict growth and production per unit of water used. Related research examines plantation water use interactions with growth to apply results at catchment scales. The overall goal is to better understand and quantify plantation water use to improve efficiency and ensure balance with other water needs.
This document discusses improving the sustainability of water infrastructure projects in developing countries. It proposes measuring investments in "water-person-years" to shift focus from increasing coverage to long-term operation and maintenance of existing systems. The current approach of setting ambitious coverage targets does not incentivize maintaining infrastructure, and many water sources break down within a few years. Measuring investments by the number of people served over time could help allocate resources more efficiently and sustainably.
Enabling communities to regenerate mountain landscapes in the African HighlandsILRI
Presented by Tilahun Amede at the Stakeholders’ Workshop on Enhancing Communities’ Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change Induced Water Scarcity in Kabe Watershed, South Wollo Zone, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia, 24-25 November 2011.
The document discusses dialogues around shared waters in the Nile Basin and how to adapt to uncertainties. It covers:
1) The importance of dialogues in facilitating cooperation over the transboundary Nile River between states and communities.
2) The role of institutions like the Nile Basin Initiative (NBI) and Nile Basin Discourse (NBD) in establishing dialogue frameworks.
3) The many challenges and uncertainties facing water management in the basin, like population growth, climate change, and different country priorities, that dialogues need to help navigate.
1. The document outlines an agenda for a presentation that includes a video, discussions of global challenges, the LIFELINK concept and business models, sustainability, transparency, and learnings.
2. Key global challenges mentioned are poverty, resource and food crises, as well as climate change issues that could threaten global security.
3. The LIFELINK concept provides clean water access through a system that transfers water credits to users' water keys via a mobile banking and internet-connected database system.
The document summarizes efforts to build consensus around a plan to clean up decades of sediment pollution in San Diego Bay. A strategic campaign engaged elected officials, created positive media coverage, and built a broad coalition of supporters including labor groups, businesses, and community organizations. On November 9th, 2011, this diverse coalition provided testimony supporting the middle-ground cleanup plan at a public hearing. As a result, the regional water board approved the "monumental" and "historic" bay cleanup plan to address a decades-long environmental issue in the area.
Climate change adaptation in SADC: a strategy for the Water SectorBertrand Meinier
This document summarizes a workshop on adapting to climate change in transboundary water basins in Southern Africa. It outlines that the region will get hotter and drier, with more variable precipitation patterns and more extreme floods and droughts. It describes the process used to develop a strategy for climate change adaptation in the water sector, including consultation with ministers, experts, and donors. The strategy focuses on no-regrets interventions in water governance, management, and infrastructure development to build resilience.
This document provides guidance from the Pacific Institute on water-related collective action. It outlines five key elements for preparing and implementing collective action: 1) articulating water challenges and action areas, 2) characterizing interested stakeholders, 3) selecting a level of engagement, 4) preparing for collective action, and 5) implementation, refinement and evolution. It also provides examples of potential collective action areas from the Water Action Hub and how to connect actions to underlying causes of water issues. The guidance is intended to help companies new to external engagement properly scope options and have solid footing for external discussions on water-related collective action.
The UN Global Compact: CEO Water Mandate and the Water Action Hub. Jason Morrison, Technical Director of CEO Water Mandate. International Annual UN-Water Zaragoza Conference 2012/2013. Preparing for the 2013 International Year. Water Cooperation: Making it Happen! 8-10 January 2013
SUCCESSFUL LAND USE PLANNING EDUCATION ADDRESSING MULTIPLE JURISDICTIONSnacaa
Valuable partnerships were formed to address complex multi-jurisdictional land use planning issues in Virginia. An educational workshop was attended by 36 representatives from 5 municipalities. Presentations by state experts covered emerging issues and land conservation programs. An expert panel discussion allowed participants to discuss locality-specific concerns. As a result, counties have begun adopting land conservation practices and incorporating smart growth concepts into plans.
This document provides an overview and introduction to a briefing kit focused on demonstrating how recommendations from the World Commission on Dams (WCD) have been implemented in actions and policies around the world. The WCD conducted a comprehensive, two-year review of large dam projects and concluded that while dams have contributed to development, they have often come at unacceptable social and environmental costs. The briefing kit highlights categories of WCD recommendations and examples of how policies, regulations, and projects have reflected these recommendations in areas such as public acceptance, environmental impacts, benefits sharing, and compliance. However, it notes that full implementation of WCD guidelines remains uneven.
Sydney Water Corp Customer Council Annual Providing Advice, Feedback And As...Christina Parmionova
The Corporate Customer Council provides advice and feedback to Sydney Water on its operations. In the past year, the Council discussed Sydney Water's desalination and recycling projects, water pressure management program, and private sewer rehabilitation communications. The Council also advised Sydney Water on its marketing campaigns and messaging around water conservation and recycling.
This document discusses several case studies from the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF) that resulted in outcomes. It focuses on a case study in Peru around the development of benefit sharing mechanisms for water resources in the Cañete River watershed. Over 8-10 years, CPWF Phase 1 and 2 research contributed to changes in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding water valuation, payment targeting, and legal reforms that enabled the drafting of national ecosystem services legislation in Peru. The document also briefly mentions case studies on slash and mulch agriculture in Central America, urban wastewater use in West Africa, and a precursor project in Zimbabwe that addressed challenges in goat farming through innovations like organized auctions.
The document discusses the science of sustainability and its implications for society. It notes that sustainability means meeting current needs without compromising future generations' ability to meet their needs. It then examines issues like population growth, resource consumption, climate change, and their impacts on areas like food, water, energy, and conflicts. Finally, it argues that major changes are needed across all parts of society if humanity is to transition to a sustainable model.
Water and sanitation service models for the urban poor: Defining stakeholder relations, achieving sustainable finance
Side Event WEDC 06/07/2011. Session organized by WSUP Cranfield University and BPD Water and Sanitation
October 2009 marks the first anniversary for the Sustainability Committee of the Downtown Los Angeles Neighborhood Council. This document outlines some of our work in our first year.
The document discusses the LiveDiverse project which aims to improve livelihoods for local people while protecting biodiversity in developing countries. The project takes place across several sites in Europe and developing regions of South Africa, Costa Rica, Vietnam, India, and Scotland. The overall strategy involves creating a knowledge base on biodiversity and livelihood vulnerabilities, identifying areas at high risk, developing scenarios, and formulating policy recommendations. The central issues examined are agricultural systems, competition over water and dams, rural communities, alternative livelihoods, legal/policy systems, human settlements, and cultural traditions at the biodiversity and livelihood interface.
The document discusses strategies for transitioning cities to become more water sensitive and sustainable, highlighting the need to adopt diverse water sources, use green infrastructure to provide ecosystem services, and build social and institutional capacity. It also outlines Brisbane City Council's efforts to become a more water smart city through their healthy waterways program which aims to improve water quality, enhance riparian zones, and allocate resources effectively to priority catchments.
This document proposes a benefit sharing paradigm for REDD+ in Indonesia that views communities as co-owners of projects rather than disturbed neighbors. It suggests defining benefits more broadly than just cash distributions, to include well-being, sustainability, and fulfilled social needs derived from carbon as well as other ecosystem services. The document outlines identifying various beneficiaries like communities, developers, and governments and their potential benefits, and distributing benefits through existing and new channels as part of a green development plan while ensuring community access, safeguards, and transparency. Key challenges mentioned are developing legal frameworks, defining ownership and beneficiaries, increasing capacity for management, and preventing corruption.
The Kailali Disaster Risk Reduction Initiatives II (KDRRI II) project aimed to reduce disaster risks for over 24,000 individuals in Kailali District, Nepal. The project worked with communities to establish early warning systems, conduct disaster preparedness planning, implement small-scale mitigation measures, and engage youth in disaster response training. These efforts helped communities successfully evacuate and limit losses when severe floods struck the region in 2008. Building on the success of phase I, KDRRI II expanded these activities to additional communities along the Kandara River to increase resilience to flooding.
Advocacy by the Ombudsman enabling Water ReformsBlancheCotlear
This case study explains the role the national Ombudsman played in facilitating the dialogue between water users and the national regulator for the water reform and improvements in the regulation.
This document discusses payments for watershed services (PWS) and summarizes key discussions from a meeting in Bellagio, Italy in 2007. It defines PWS as voluntary transactions between service buyers and sellers to manage land in ways that protect watershed services. The meeting brought together practitioners, researchers, and investors with experience in PWS schemes. They discussed lessons learned from global experiences to improve watershed management efficiency. The document also summarizes two common types of PWS schemes - user-financed schemes negotiated between buyers and sellers, and government-financed schemes where the state pays on behalf of users.
This document summarizes research on quantifying and predicting the impacts of forest plantation water use. The research aims to improve models for predicting plantation water use over seasons to help managers make informed land use decisions. It also seeks to estimate water use across regions with plantations to predict growth and production per unit of water used. Related research examines plantation water use interactions with growth to apply results at catchment scales. The overall goal is to better understand and quantify plantation water use to improve efficiency and ensure balance with other water needs.
This document discusses improving the sustainability of water infrastructure projects in developing countries. It proposes measuring investments in "water-person-years" to shift focus from increasing coverage to long-term operation and maintenance of existing systems. The current approach of setting ambitious coverage targets does not incentivize maintaining infrastructure, and many water sources break down within a few years. Measuring investments by the number of people served over time could help allocate resources more efficiently and sustainably.
Enabling communities to regenerate mountain landscapes in the African HighlandsILRI
Presented by Tilahun Amede at the Stakeholders’ Workshop on Enhancing Communities’ Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change Induced Water Scarcity in Kabe Watershed, South Wollo Zone, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia, 24-25 November 2011.
The document discusses dialogues around shared waters in the Nile Basin and how to adapt to uncertainties. It covers:
1) The importance of dialogues in facilitating cooperation over the transboundary Nile River between states and communities.
2) The role of institutions like the Nile Basin Initiative (NBI) and Nile Basin Discourse (NBD) in establishing dialogue frameworks.
3) The many challenges and uncertainties facing water management in the basin, like population growth, climate change, and different country priorities, that dialogues need to help navigate.
Payments for peatland ecosystem services in the Natural Environment White PaperAberdeen CES
The document discusses opportunities for payments for ecosystem services (PES) schemes in the UK, noting they have potential to provide new financing streams for conservation if they can directly link those who benefit from ecosystem services to those who manage the land. Barriers to PES include informational, technical, financial, and institutional challenges, though none are insurmountable. Defra's work includes developing best practice guidance, funding pilot PES projects, and reviewing barriers and recommendations to support wider use of these schemes.
Enhancing communities’ adaptive capacity to climate change in drought-prone h...ILRI
Presented by Tilahun Amede and Yitbarek W/Hawariat at the Stakeholders’ Workshop on Enhancing Communities’ Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change Induced Water Scarcity in Kabe Watershed, South Wollo Zone, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia, 24-25 November 2011.
C4.01: Overview of the Coastal Zone Community of Practice & Services for the ...Blue Planet Symposium
The Coastal Zone Community of Practice (CZCP) brings together experts to inform coastal zone management with Earth observations and supports GEO tasks like developing a Global Coastal Zone Information System. The CZCP has organized regional workshops focusing on the Mediterranean, Africa, and the Caribbean to identify user needs and emphasize the importance of understanding decision makers. The CZCP also works to populate the GEOSS User Requirements Registry, support coastal observation programs, and facilitate data sharing to transition its focus toward providing coastal zone information services.
The document summarizes key conditions for implementing Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM), as presented in a lecture by Dr. Basharat Mushtaq. Some important conditions include having political will and commitment across levels to unite stakeholders; developing a basin management plan and clear vision; establishing participation and coordination mechanisms to share information; building capacity at all levels; creating flexible and enforceable legal frameworks; developing water allocation plans; ensuring adequate long-term investment and cost recovery; maintaining good knowledge of natural resources in the basin; and conducting comprehensive monitoring and evaluation. River Basin Organizations are also discussed as a way to help coordinate IWRM across boundaries through information sharing and integrated approaches.
Irrigation futures - Role of community participation and partnershipsChristina Parmionova
Role of community participation and partnerships: the Virginia pipeline scheme
This article was written by Ganesh Keremane and Jennifer McKay. It was published in the AWA Water Journal in November 2006.
www.awa.asn.au
Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) is a principle that indigenous communities have the right to give or withhold consent to projects that may affect their lands. It involves meaningful participation and decision making according to customary systems. FPIC is relevant for projects involving infrastructure, natural resources and research. When implemented properly, it can help communities negotiate benefits and block unacceptable projects. However, ensuring FPIC is implemented fairly presents challenges around power balances, representation, and verification. Carbon projects should fully incorporate FPIC principles to respect land rights and ensure equitable benefit sharing.
Nile Basin Development Challenge: Rainwater Management SystemsILRI
The document discusses the Nile Basin Development Challenge (NBDC) which aims to improve rainwater management systems in the Ethiopian highlands. It notes the significant potential of the Blue Nile Basin but current underutilization due to lack of knowledge, technologies, and complex transboundary issues. The NBDC will focus on increasing rainwater productivity through innovations, addressing poverty and degradation, and building institutional capacity. It will involve partnerships across different organizations and scales to identify best practices, target interventions, and ensure research is linked to development goals.
T8 elena lopez gunn testing the water tenure concept in spainNENAwaterscarcity
This document summarizes a study that tested the concept of water tenure in Spain. Water tenure analyzes relationships between water users and uses, both formal and informal, to identify areas for improved water management. The study analyzed water tenure arrangements in two river basins in Spain using mixed quantitative and qualitative methods, including interviews and workshops. Preliminary results found that farmers preferred the flexibility of water tenure while still wanting oversight to ensure equitable use and sustainability. The study aims to evaluate if water tenure can contribute to better water resources management and access to water services by providing a more comprehensive understanding to inform policy reforms.
T8: Testing the Water Tenure approach: does it add value? The experience in S...FAO
Testing the Water Tenure approach: does it add value? The experience in Spain, By Elena Lopez-Gunn et al, Land and Water Days in Near East & North Africa, 15-18 December 2013, Amman, Jordan
WATER INNOVATION SUMMIT 2023 | Sessione 6-MalagutiServizi a rete
This document discusses a conference on technology transfer between Israel and Italy in integrated water services to be held from June 21-23, 2023 in Bari, Italy. It provides an introduction to UNIDROIT, an intergovernmental organization established in 1926 to harmonize private law between countries. It discusses UNIDROIT's work developing modern legal standards and legislation related to water resources, agricultural land investments, and protecting water access rights. Finally, it proposes drawing lessons from historical civic uses of land and water in Italy to help manage conflicts over water resources.
Developing Guidance Policies for the Management of Decentralized Wastewater T...Oswar Mungkasa
prepared By: David M. Robbins Water and Environment for Development, RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Rd, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina USA 27709-2194 (Email: drobbins@rti.org) for Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems (DEWATS) for Urban Environments in Asia, 25-28 May 2011, Manila, Philippines. organized by International Water Association (IWA).
WATER INNOVATION SUMMIT 2023 | Sessione 6-BRUNSCHWIGServizi a rete
The document discusses the Mediterranean Water Institute's (MWI) role in facilitating cooperation and exchange of best practices around water management in the Mediterranean region. It outlines MWI's membership distribution and past achievements, including knowledge production and enabling the sharing of experiences between countries. It then presents MWI's involvement in the 10th World Water Forum process, which includes organizing regional dialogues to identify priorities and solutions for water challenges in the Mediterranean. Major upcoming events are noted, including a forum in Tunisia to inform the 10th World Water Forum in Bali, Indonesia. The document encourages joining MWI to participate in these initiatives.
Similar to Payments for watershed services the bellagio conversations (20)
The Comarapa Municipal Water Fund in Bolivia was created in 2008 to sustain the environmental services of the Comarapa watershed through conservation and restoration efforts. The Fund is administered by the Caballero Public Services Cooperative and collects contributions from the municipal government, a local NGO, and water cooperative members. In its first two years, the Fund compensated 10 families for conserving 628 hectares of cloud forest, collecting $22,400. The Fund aims to ultimately conserve 80% of the upper watershed forests to maintain water supply and quality for downstream communities.
Tratos justos para servicios hidrologicos en boliviaInvan Perez
Este documento resume un estudio realizado en Bolivia sobre si los mecanismos de mercado pueden mejorar el manejo de cuencas y las condiciones de vida de los pobladores. El estudio encontró que: (1) Los mecanismos de mercado pueden mejorar los medios de vida rurales a través de impactos indirectos más que pagos directos. (2) Se necesitan enfoques flexibles que consideren el contexto local. (3) Los esquemas deben diseñarse e implementarse con la participación de las comunidades locales.
1) A study is evaluating the impact of payments for ecosystem services (PES) schemes in Bolivia by dividing 130 villages randomly into groups that do or do not receive payments for protecting forested watersheds.
2) The experiment will show whether conditional payments actually lead to environmental and economic benefits and provide insights into the relationship between poverty and ecosystem services.
3) It is one of the first studies to apply an experimental design to evaluate a large-scale conservation program, with the goal of rigorously measuring impact and generating new knowledge about what works.
(1) Este estudio evaluó la relación entre la cubierta forestal y el caudal de los ríos en la cuenca Los Negros en Bolivia, midiendo directamente los caudales y tasas de precipitación durante 3 años con datos recolectados por agricultores locales. (2) Los resultados no mostraron una relación clara entre la cubierta forestal y el caudal, posiblemente debido al corto período de estudio y la baja calidad de los datos. (3) Sin embargo, con mejoras en las metodologías, un sistema de monitoreo hidroló
El documento describe una reunión de 24 individuos de 13 países en el Bellagio Center de Italia del 12 al 17 de marzo de 2007 para discutir lecciones aprendidas de esquemas de pagos por servicios hídricos. Los participantes incluyeron implementadores, investigadores e inversionistas con experiencia en 9 esquemas de PSH. El objetivo fue considerar cómo mejorar la eficiencia del manejo de cuencas usando estas experiencias. Se espera que las conversaciones motiven a otros a aprovechar oportunidades en PSH.
This document summarizes a report on the impact of policies related to water ecosystem services in Bolivia. It finds that policies have varying impacts depending on the region due to geographical differences. Most policy interventions affect the inter-Andean valleys, as human activities there can define water availability, unlike the highlands or lowlands. Bolivia's water laws are outdated and contradictory, creating a confused system. Climate change is projected to increase droughts and floods in different areas, threatening subsistence farming. While many policies aim to protect water services, their real impact is minimal due to lack of enforcement. The report argues research is needed but must be led locally to build capacity and rigorously evaluate policy interventions through empirical studies.
Fair deals for watershed services in boliviaInvan Perez
This document summarizes a study on using market mechanisms for watershed management to improve rural livelihoods in Bolivia. The study found that while direct payments for watershed services had small impacts, indirect effects like community organizing were more significant. Decentralization allowed local control facilitating local development of incentives. Successful schemes were developed locally with existing property rights and trust in communities. Large top-down projects generally failed while small-scale traditional management systems succeeded. Building local capacity was key to further developing innovative watershed management.
This document provides photo credits for three photos used, attributing the top photo to Maps.com, the bottom photo to photostogo.com, and two additional photos to Nigel Asquith. It also includes a website address for more information.
This document summarizes the development of an environmental management program in Bolivia's Santa Cruz valleys that uses market-based incentives to encourage conservation of forested watersheds. It describes how early efforts established local water funds to compensate upstream farmers for conserving forests that provide downstream irrigation and drinking water. However, the program's effectiveness was unknown until researchers developed a randomized controlled trial to scientifically evaluate the impact of direct incentives on conservation outcomes and community welfare. The experiment aims to determine whether compensation achieves more effective conservation than information alone. Its results may help optimize conservation spending globally.
Asquith et al ecological economics 2008Invan Perez
1. A payment for environmental services (PES) scheme in Los Negros valley, Bolivia pays 46 farmers to conserve 2774 hectares of native vegetation, including cloud forest habitat.
2. The scheme has two buyers - an international donor interested in biodiversity conservation, and downstream irrigators represented by the local municipality, who pay to protect forest that maintains dry-season water flows.
3. Farmers are paid annually through in-kind compensation like beehives and training to refrain from activities that damage the forest like cutting trees or hunting. Strict monitoring ensures compliance with contracts that are renewed yearly.
Xie et al rehabilitating a degraded watershedInvan Perez
This document provides background information on the degraded watershed conditions in China's Loess Plateau prior to rehabilitation projects. It describes the severe environmental degradation and poverty in the region, where erosion had stripped topsoil, leaving a barren landscape. The degraded watershed was causing massive amounts of sediment to flow into the Yellow River. The document introduces Huang Ziqiang, the director seeking solutions to restore the watershed and improve lives of the local people.
Este documento presenta información sobre varios proyectos de conservación en Bolivia. Brevemente:
1) El municipio de Quirusillas se ha convertido en un modelo de conservación al compensar a 54 familias que conservaron 900 hectáreas de bosque con cajas apícolas e insumos para la apicultura.
2) Siete cooperativas de agua en El Torno se unieron para apoyar la conservación de bosques que protegen sus fuentes de agua, aportando $1 por factura.
3) Estos esfuerzos han ayud
Best 20 SEO Techniques To Improve Website Visibility In SERPPixlogix Infotech
Boost your website's visibility with proven SEO techniques! Our latest blog dives into essential strategies to enhance your online presence, increase traffic, and rank higher on search engines. From keyword optimization to quality content creation, learn how to make your site stand out in the crowded digital landscape. Discover actionable tips and expert insights to elevate your SEO game.
Have you ever been confused by the myriad of choices offered by AWS for hosting a website or an API?
Lambda, Elastic Beanstalk, Lightsail, Amplify, S3 (and more!) can each host websites + APIs. But which one should we choose?
Which one is cheapest? Which one is fastest? Which one will scale to meet our needs?
Join me in this session as we dive into each AWS hosting service to determine which one is best for your scenario and explain why!
Taking AI to the Next Level in Manufacturing.pdfssuserfac0301
Read Taking AI to the Next Level in Manufacturing to gain insights on AI adoption in the manufacturing industry, such as:
1. How quickly AI is being implemented in manufacturing.
2. Which barriers stand in the way of AI adoption.
3. How data quality and governance form the backbone of AI.
4. Organizational processes and structures that may inhibit effective AI adoption.
6. Ideas and approaches to help build your organization's AI strategy.
zkStudyClub - LatticeFold: A Lattice-based Folding Scheme and its Application...Alex Pruden
Folding is a recent technique for building efficient recursive SNARKs. Several elegant folding protocols have been proposed, such as Nova, Supernova, Hypernova, Protostar, and others. However, all of them rely on an additively homomorphic commitment scheme based on discrete log, and are therefore not post-quantum secure. In this work we present LatticeFold, the first lattice-based folding protocol based on the Module SIS problem. This folding protocol naturally leads to an efficient recursive lattice-based SNARK and an efficient PCD scheme. LatticeFold supports folding low-degree relations, such as R1CS, as well as high-degree relations, such as CCS. The key challenge is to construct a secure folding protocol that works with the Ajtai commitment scheme. The difficulty, is ensuring that extracted witnesses are low norm through many rounds of folding. We present a novel technique using the sumcheck protocol to ensure that extracted witnesses are always low norm no matter how many rounds of folding are used. Our evaluation of the final proof system suggests that it is as performant as Hypernova, while providing post-quantum security.
Paper Link: https://eprint.iacr.org/2024/257
FREE A4 Cyber Security Awareness Posters-Social Engineering part 3Data Hops
Free A4 downloadable and printable Cyber Security, Social Engineering Safety and security Training Posters . Promote security awareness in the home or workplace. Lock them Out From training providers datahops.com
GraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracyTomaz Bratanic
GraphRAG for life science domain, where you retriever information from biomedical knowledge graphs using LLMs to increase the accuracy and performance of generated answers
Fueling AI with Great Data with Airbyte WebinarZilliz
This talk will focus on how to collect data from a variety of sources, leveraging this data for RAG and other GenAI use cases, and finally charting your course to productionalization.
HCL Notes and Domino License Cost Reduction in the World of DLAUpanagenda
Webinar Recording: https://www.panagenda.com/webinars/hcl-notes-and-domino-license-cost-reduction-in-the-world-of-dlau/
The introduction of DLAU and the CCB & CCX licensing model caused quite a stir in the HCL community. As a Notes and Domino customer, you may have faced challenges with unexpected user counts and license costs. You probably have questions on how this new licensing approach works and how to benefit from it. Most importantly, you likely have budget constraints and want to save money where possible. Don’t worry, we can help with all of this!
We’ll show you how to fix common misconfigurations that cause higher-than-expected user counts, and how to identify accounts which you can deactivate to save money. There are also frequent patterns that can cause unnecessary cost, like using a person document instead of a mail-in for shared mailboxes. We’ll provide examples and solutions for those as well. And naturally we’ll explain the new licensing model.
Join HCL Ambassador Marc Thomas in this webinar with a special guest appearance from Franz Walder. It will give you the tools and know-how to stay on top of what is going on with Domino licensing. You will be able lower your cost through an optimized configuration and keep it low going forward.
These topics will be covered
- Reducing license cost by finding and fixing misconfigurations and superfluous accounts
- How do CCB and CCX licenses really work?
- Understanding the DLAU tool and how to best utilize it
- Tips for common problem areas, like team mailboxes, functional/test users, etc
- Practical examples and best practices to implement right away
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slackshyamraj55
Discover the seamless integration of RPA (Robotic Process Automation), COMPOSER, and APM with AWS IDP enhanced with Slack notifications. Explore how these technologies converge to streamline workflows, optimize performance, and ensure secure access, all while leveraging the power of AWS IDP and real-time communication via Slack notifications.
Skybuffer AI: Advanced Conversational and Generative AI Solution on SAP Busin...Tatiana Kojar
Skybuffer AI, built on the robust SAP Business Technology Platform (SAP BTP), is the latest and most advanced version of our AI development, reaffirming our commitment to delivering top-tier AI solutions. Skybuffer AI harnesses all the innovative capabilities of the SAP BTP in the AI domain, from Conversational AI to cutting-edge Generative AI and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). It also helps SAP customers safeguard their investments into SAP Conversational AI and ensure a seamless, one-click transition to SAP Business AI.
With Skybuffer AI, various AI models can be integrated into a single communication channel such as Microsoft Teams. This integration empowers business users with insights drawn from SAP backend systems, enterprise documents, and the expansive knowledge of Generative AI. And the best part of it is that it is all managed through our intuitive no-code Action Server interface, requiring no extensive coding knowledge and making the advanced AI accessible to more users.
Ivanti’s Patch Tuesday breakdown goes beyond patching your applications and brings you the intelligence and guidance needed to prioritize where to focus your attention first. Catch early analysis on our Ivanti blog, then join industry expert Chris Goettl for the Patch Tuesday Webinar Event. There we’ll do a deep dive into each of the bulletins and give guidance on the risks associated with the newly-identified vulnerabilities.
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup SlidesZilliz
Prompting language models is hard, while programming language models is easy. In this talk, I will discuss the state-of-the-art framework DSPy for programming foundation models with its powerful optimizers and runtime constraint system.
Driving Business Innovation: Latest Generative AI Advancements & Success StorySafe Software
Are you ready to revolutionize how you handle data? Join us for a webinar where we’ll bring you up to speed with the latest advancements in Generative AI technology and discover how leveraging FME with tools from giants like Google Gemini, Amazon, and Microsoft OpenAI can supercharge your workflow efficiency.
During the hour, we’ll take you through:
Guest Speaker Segment with Hannah Barrington: Dive into the world of dynamic real estate marketing with Hannah, the Marketing Manager at Workspace Group. Hear firsthand how their team generates engaging descriptions for thousands of office units by integrating diverse data sources—from PDF floorplans to web pages—using FME transformers, like OpenAIVisionConnector and AnthropicVisionConnector. This use case will show you how GenAI can streamline content creation for marketing across the board.
Ollama Use Case: Learn how Scenario Specialist Dmitri Bagh has utilized Ollama within FME to input data, create custom models, and enhance security protocols. This segment will include demos to illustrate the full capabilities of FME in AI-driven processes.
Custom AI Models: Discover how to leverage FME to build personalized AI models using your data. Whether it’s populating a model with local data for added security or integrating public AI tools, find out how FME facilitates a versatile and secure approach to AI.
We’ll wrap up with a live Q&A session where you can engage with our experts on your specific use cases, and learn more about optimizing your data workflows with AI.
This webinar is ideal for professionals seeking to harness the power of AI within their data management systems while ensuring high levels of customization and security. Whether you're a novice or an expert, gain actionable insights and strategies to elevate your data processes. Join us to see how FME and AI can revolutionize how you work with data!
Nordic Marketo Engage User Group_June 13_ 2024.pptx
Payments for watershed services the bellagio conversations
1.
2. Fundación Natura Bolivia 2008 The Bellagio Conversations
All rights reserved
From March 12th to 17th 2007, 24 individuals from 13 countries met at the Rockefeller
IBSN: 978-99905-971-0-3
Foundation’s Bellagio Center at Lake Como (Italy) to discuss lessons learned from
Legal deposit: 8-1-931-08 recent global experiences with payments for watershed services (PWS). The
selection of participants reflected a desire to bring together a mix of:
Citation: Asquith, N. and S. Wunder (eds). 2008. Payments for
• Practitioners—managers who are actually implementing PWS schemes;
Watershed Services: The Bellagio Conversations. Fundación Natura
Bolivia: Santa Cruz de la Sierra • Investigators—researchers who have been directly involved in studying the
design and implementation of PWS schemes; and
Fundación Natura Bolivia • Investors—intermediaries who have the potential to invest in PWS initiatives.
Santa Cruz de la Sierra Between them, these practitioners, investigators and investors had experience of nine
Bolivia payments for watershed services schemes and detailed knowledge of 15 more.
Tel/fax: (+591 3) 3395133 The goal of the Bellagio meeting was to consider how these experiences and
naturabolivia@naturabolivia.org knowledge could be used to improve the efficiency of watershed management.
www.naturabolivia.org We believe that the resulting “Bellagio Conversations” can help shed light on some
of the most important, pressing, complex and under-discussed PWS issues. Our
Copy edited (Stephanie Secomb), designed (Raul Castillo) and hope is that these conversations will encourage others to tackle the opportunities
printed (Imprenta España) in Bolivia and challenges of payments for watershed services.
The Bellagio Conversations were hosted by the Rockefeller
Foundation in its Bellagio Study and Conference Center in
hat are payments for watershed services?
Italy. They received financial support from the Rockefeller
Most water users would prefer their water to be free of charge, and most
Foundation and from the UK Department for International
upstream land managers would prefer their activities to be unrestricted.
Development (DFID) as part of a multi-country project
coordinated by the International Institute for Environment However, the upper watersheds that should provide clean water to downstream users
and Development (IIED) on developing markets for watershed often have to support additional and sometimes conflicting functions, such as agriculture
services and improved livellihoods. The views expressed in and forestry activities. Existing regulatory frameworks have often proved unable to
this report do not necessarily represent those of the reconcile these conflicting needs. Watershed management may be improved by
institutions involved, nor do they necessarily represent providing incentives to upstream land users to adopt production systems and land use
official UK government and/or DFID policies. practices that are better aligned with the importance and value attached by downstream
recipients to the environmental services yielded by those systems.
Payments for watershed services (PWS), a subset of “payments for environmental
services” (PES), appear to have the potential to improve resource management. The
rationale behind PWS is that downstream service users benefit from the upstream
land use practices that ensure the supply of services such as protection from erosion
and sedimentation, and stream flow stabilization. However, if upstream service providers
are to take appropriate land use decisions, and provide downstream users with such
services, they likely need to be compensated for their opportunity costs, i.e. the economic
gains they would have made if they had continued with their first land use plan.
In order to illustrate the PES concept, the following is a useful starting point. In one—
albeit not universally accepted—definition, PES transactions are: (1) voluntary (2)
between at least one service buyer (3) and at least one seller (4), focused on a well-
defined service (or a land use likely to provide that service), and (5) conditional upon
contract compliance.1
1
See Wunder (2005) or Engel et al. (2008). For a general introduction to PES see Landell-Mills and Porras (2002).
3. Fundación Natura Bolivia 2008 The Bellagio Conversations
All rights reserved
From March 12th to 17th 2007, 24 individuals from 13 countries met at the Rockefeller
IBSN: 978-99905-971-0-3
Foundation’s Bellagio Center at Lake Como (Italy) to discuss lessons learned from
Legal deposit: 8-1-931-08 recent global experiences with payments for watershed services (PWS). The
selection of participants reflected a desire to bring together a mix of:
Citation: Asquith, N. and S. Wunder (eds). 2008. Payments for
• Practitioners—managers who are actually implementing PWS schemes;
Watershed Services: The Bellagio Conversations. Fundación Natura
Bolivia: Santa Cruz de la Sierra • Investigators—researchers who have been directly involved in studying the
design and implementation of PWS schemes; and
Fundación Natura Bolivia • Investors—intermediaries who have the potential to invest in PWS initiatives.
Santa Cruz de la Sierra Between them, these practitioners, investigators and investors had experience of nine
Bolivia payments for watershed services schemes and detailed knowledge of 15 more.
Tel/fax: (+591 3) 3395133 The goal of the Bellagio meeting was to consider how these experiences and
naturabolivia@naturabolivia.org knowledge could be used to improve the efficiency of watershed management.
www.naturabolivia.org We believe that the resulting “Bellagio Conversations” can help shed light on some
of the most important, pressing, complex and under-discussed PWS issues. Our
Copy edited (Stephanie Secomb), designed (Raul Castillo) and hope is that these conversations will encourage others to tackle the opportunities
printed (Imprenta España) in Bolivia and challenges of payments for watershed services.
The Bellagio Conversations were hosted by the Rockefeller
Foundation in its Bellagio Study and Conference Center in
hat are payments for watershed services?
Italy. They received financial support from the Rockefeller
Most water users would prefer their water to be free of charge, and most
Foundation and from the UK Department for International
upstream land managers would prefer their activities to be unrestricted.
Development (DFID) as part of a multi-country project
coordinated by the International Institute for Environment However, the upper watersheds that should provide clean water to downstream users
and Development (IIED) on developing markets for watershed often have to support additional and sometimes conflicting functions, such as agriculture
services and improved livellihoods. The views expressed in and forestry activities. Existing regulatory frameworks have often proved unable to
this report do not necessarily represent those of the reconcile these conflicting needs. Watershed management may be improved by
institutions involved, nor do they necessarily represent providing incentives to upstream land users to adopt production systems and land use
official UK government and/or DFID policies. practices that are better aligned with the importance and value attached by downstream
recipients to the environmental services yielded by those systems.
Payments for watershed services (PWS), a subset of “payments for environmental
services” (PES), appear to have the potential to improve resource management. The
rationale behind PWS is that downstream service users benefit from the upstream
land use practices that ensure the supply of services such as protection from erosion
and sedimentation, and stream flow stabilization. However, if upstream service providers
are to take appropriate land use decisions, and provide downstream users with such
services, they likely need to be compensated for their opportunity costs, i.e. the economic
gains they would have made if they had continued with their first land use plan.
In order to illustrate the PES concept, the following is a useful starting point. In one—
albeit not universally accepted—definition, PES transactions are: (1) voluntary (2)
between at least one service buyer (3) and at least one seller (4), focused on a well-
defined service (or a land use likely to provide that service), and (5) conditional upon
contract compliance.1
1
See Wunder (2005) or Engel et al. (2008). For a general introduction to PES see Landell-Mills and Porras (2002).
4. The last of these archetypal PES criteria, pronounced conditionality (5), is perhaps its The second generic type is government-financed PWS
most revolutionary feature. The concept of conditionality is an important theoretical schemes, where the state acts on behalf of service users
difference between PWS and other watershed management tools—downstream water across a number of targeted watersheds or regions, using
users pay for watersheds services if, and only if, lands are managed in such a way to tax revenues or obligatory user fees for payments. Here,
provide the desired service. In contrast, traditional tools such as integrated watershed service users cannot directly decide to stop the payments
management (IWM) have not had the same degree of conditionality. IWM interventions if they do not get what they paid for. Correspondingly, service
have sometimes involved rewards and investments, e.g. building a local school, but providers normally cannot influence scheme design or
these have not been contingent, i.e. the school would not be closed if providers failed payment rates, which tend to be offered by the state as a
to comply with agreed-upon land use measures. fixed menu. Payment rates and other modalities are typically
more uniform and less customized to local conditions, and
The criterion of a well-defined service (4) is particularly critical for watershed services, side objectives such as poverty alleviation and regional
because the biophysical linkages between land use changes and service outcomes development typically play a large role. Such schemes thus
can be complex. The criteria of at least one buyer (2) and one seller (3) ensure that tend to be “PWS-like”, less-than-fully conforming to the five
PES is a real transaction between economic agents, though in practice intermediaries PES principles. On the other hand, these schemes are
such as non-government organizations (NGOs) often play a prominent role in negotiations. normally much larger in size, thus exploiting economies of
Finally, the voluntary nature of PES deals (1) may or may not in practice be fully attained. scale in setup and ongoing administrative costs. Some state-
For instance, collective deals can be struck between a service-providing upstream run schemes are at least nominally focused on watershed
community and a downstream water authority, in which case both individual buyers protection, such as the Chinese Sloping Land Conversion
and sellers may have been “signed up for PES” without their individual consent. Program (7.2 million ha land retired; 4.9 million ha planted
with trees), or Mexico’s national watershed protection program
Few experiences to date have simultaneously complied with all these theoretical (126,000 ha). Other schemes buy not only watershed
principles. In cases where the PES principles apply with little deviation, it may be useful protection, but also other environmental services that are
for the clarity of analysis and discussion to refer to such schemes as “PES-like” provided from contracted areas. Examples here are
(or “PWS-like”). Costa Rica’s PES scheme (600,000 ha), and the United States
Conservation Reserve Program (about 14.5 million ha).3
In practice, two generic PWS types are being implemented around the world. The first Experiences to date demonstrate the many possible variations
one is user-financed PWS schemes, the conditions of which have usually emerged
of payments for watershed services initiatives. Schemes
from the negotiation process between buyers and sellers (often through intermediaries).
have varied in their level of conditionality, their form of
Such schemes are typically carried out at the scale of one or more targeted watersheds,
and are thus small-to-medium sized in terms of contracted areas. Most are designed payment, and their degree of government involvement. One
in ways that bring them close to the five theoretical PES principles. Examples include thing is clear though: the PWS concept is becoming
the Vittel watershed scheme in France and municipal water programs in Heredia increasingly popular, even while there have been few
(Costa Rica), Pimampiro (Ecuador) and Los Negros (Bolivia).2 experience-based assessments of what works in PWS
schemes, what doesn’t and why.
The Bellagio Conversations were designed to fill this gap.
User-financed PWS: The Vittel (Nestlé Waters) watershed protection program in Eastern France
Prior to our meeting in March 2007, a series of 10-page
Since 1993, mineral water bottler Vittel has conducted a PWS program in a 5,100 ha catchment in the Vosges Mountains.
“primer” papers were commissioned among participants to
The program pays all 27 farmers in the watershed to adopt best practices in dairy farming. The program is implemented
through Agrivair, a buyer-created agricultural extension agency, which is trusted by farmers. It has persuaded farmers assess the global state-of-knowledge on each of what we
to convert to extensive low-impact dairy farming, including abandoning agrochemicals, composting animal waste, and considered to be the “hot” PWS issues. Our conversations
reducing animal stocks. The program combines cash payments with technical assistance, reimbursement of incremental in Bellagio were then structured as follows: the first day and
labor costs, and arrangements to take over lands and provide use rights to the farmers. Contracts are from 18 to 30 a half comprised a series of short (20-minute) presentations
years, payments are differentiated according to opportunity costs, and both land use and water quality is closely monitored. based on the primers followed by an hour of discussions.
Total costs (excluding the intermediary’s transaction costs) were almost US$25 million between 1993 and 2000. Monitoring The purpose was to approach a consensus on each topic
has shown an improvement of the water service compared with the declining ecosystem service baseline, and the high within the group. On the third day, participants split into self-
service value has made the investments profitable. selected small groups to further discuss and begin writing
2
For a discussion of user- versus government-financed schemes, see Aylward (2007), Engel et al. (2008), and Wunder et al. 3
(2008). For the respective user-financed PWS schemes, see case studies by Perrot-Maître (2006), Pagiola (2008), Wunder For a comparison of different government-financed schemes, see Wunder et al. (2008). For case studies of the respective
and Albán (2008) and Asquith et al. (2008). government-financed schemes, see Bennett (2008), Muñoz-Piña et al. (2008), Pagiola et al. (2008), and Claassen et al. (2008). 3
5. The last of these archetypal PES criteria, pronounced conditionality (5), is perhaps its The second generic type is government-financed PWS
most revolutionary feature. The concept of conditionality is an important theoretical schemes, where the state acts on behalf of service users
difference between PWS and other watershed management tools—downstream water across a number of targeted watersheds or regions, using
users pay for watersheds services if, and only if, lands are managed in such a way to tax revenues or obligatory user fees for payments. Here,
provide the desired service. In contrast, traditional tools such as integrated watershed service users cannot directly decide to stop the payments
management (IWM) have not had the same degree of conditionality. IWM interventions if they do not get what they paid for. Correspondingly, service
have sometimes involved rewards and investments, e.g. building a local school, but providers normally cannot influence scheme design or
these have not been contingent, i.e. the school would not be closed if providers failed payment rates, which tend to be offered by the state as a
to comply with agreed-upon land use measures. fixed menu. Payment rates and other modalities are typically
more uniform and less customized to local conditions, and
The criterion of a well-defined service (4) is particularly critical for watershed services, side objectives such as poverty alleviation and regional
because the biophysical linkages between land use changes and service outcomes development typically play a large role. Such schemes thus
can be complex. The criteria of at least one buyer (2) and one seller (3) ensure that tend to be “PWS-like”, less-than-fully conforming to the five
PES is a real transaction between economic agents, though in practice intermediaries PES principles. On the other hand, these schemes are
such as non-government organizations (NGOs) often play a prominent role in negotiations. normally much larger in size, thus exploiting economies of
Finally, the voluntary nature of PES deals (1) may or may not in practice be fully attained. scale in setup and ongoing administrative costs. Some state-
For instance, collective deals can be struck between a service-providing upstream run schemes are at least nominally focused on watershed
community and a downstream water authority, in which case both individual buyers protection, such as the Chinese Sloping Land Conversion
and sellers may have been “signed up for PES” without their individual consent. Program (7.2 million ha land retired; 4.9 million ha planted
with trees), or Mexico’s national watershed protection program
Few experiences to date have simultaneously complied with all these theoretical (126,000 ha). Other schemes buy not only watershed
principles. In cases where the PES principles apply with little deviation, it may be useful protection, but also other environmental services that are
for the clarity of analysis and discussion to refer to such schemes as “PES-like” provided from contracted areas. Examples here are
(or “PWS-like”). Costa Rica’s PES scheme (600,000 ha), and the United States
Conservation Reserve Program (about 14.5 million ha).3
In practice, two generic PWS types are being implemented around the world. The first Experiences to date demonstrate the many possible variations
one is user-financed PWS schemes, the conditions of which have usually emerged
of payments for watershed services initiatives. Schemes
from the negotiation process between buyers and sellers (often through intermediaries).
have varied in their level of conditionality, their form of
Such schemes are typically carried out at the scale of one or more targeted watersheds,
and are thus small-to-medium sized in terms of contracted areas. Most are designed payment, and their degree of government involvement. One
in ways that bring them close to the five theoretical PES principles. Examples include thing is clear though: the PWS concept is becoming
the Vittel watershed scheme in France and municipal water programs in Heredia increasingly popular, even while there have been few
(Costa Rica), Pimampiro (Ecuador) and Los Negros (Bolivia).2 experience-based assessments of what works in PWS
schemes, what doesn’t and why.
The Bellagio Conversations were designed to fill this gap.
User-financed PWS: The Vittel (Nestlé Waters) watershed protection program in Eastern France
Prior to our meeting in March 2007, a series of 10-page
Since 1993, mineral water bottler Vittel has conducted a PWS program in a 5,100 ha catchment in the Vosges Mountains.
“primer” papers were commissioned among participants to
The program pays all 27 farmers in the watershed to adopt best practices in dairy farming. The program is implemented
through Agrivair, a buyer-created agricultural extension agency, which is trusted by farmers. It has persuaded farmers assess the global state-of-knowledge on each of what we
to convert to extensive low-impact dairy farming, including abandoning agrochemicals, composting animal waste, and considered to be the “hot” PWS issues. Our conversations
reducing animal stocks. The program combines cash payments with technical assistance, reimbursement of incremental in Bellagio were then structured as follows: the first day and
labor costs, and arrangements to take over lands and provide use rights to the farmers. Contracts are from 18 to 30 a half comprised a series of short (20-minute) presentations
years, payments are differentiated according to opportunity costs, and both land use and water quality is closely monitored. based on the primers followed by an hour of discussions.
Total costs (excluding the intermediary’s transaction costs) were almost US$25 million between 1993 and 2000. Monitoring The purpose was to approach a consensus on each topic
has shown an improvement of the water service compared with the declining ecosystem service baseline, and the high within the group. On the third day, participants split into self-
service value has made the investments profitable. selected small groups to further discuss and begin writing
2
For a discussion of user- versus government-financed schemes, see Aylward (2007), Engel et al. (2008), and Wunder et al. 3
(2008). For the respective user-financed PWS schemes, see case studies by Perrot-Maître (2006), Pagiola (2008), Wunder For a comparison of different government-financed schemes, see Wunder et al. (2008). For case studies of the respective
and Albán (2008) and Asquith et al. (2008). government-financed schemes, see Bennett (2008), Muñoz-Piña et al. (2008), Pagiola et al. (2008), and Claassen et al. (2008). 3
6. How do laws and policies affect PWS schemes,
and how can they best be influenced?
on each of the key issues. The primers provided starting points for writing, but the groups were not bound to them. Drafts
were presented to the entire group for comments and editing, until by the end of the fourth day each draft had been co- Government roles in PWS schemes range at best from enabling and implementing and at worst they can be obstructive,
written by at least three authors, and had received comments from multiple participants. but they are rarely avoidable. PWS protagonists should anticipate actively engaging with law and policy institutions in
the process of exploring PWS. Some specific legal and institutional changes are likely to be desirable but may not be
We decided to focus our conversations on currently unresolved PWS issues that are already much discussed globally, and easily addressed at the outset. Thus, PWS implementers should not wait for the perfect legal conditions to be pre-
questions we considered important but are not currently on the global agenda, namely: established, but rather try to influence conditions as they go along.
• How do laws and policies affect PWS schemes, and how can they best be influenced?
• How much research is needed prior to and during PWS implementation? When and how does it make sense
WS schemes do not operate in a legal, social or political vacuum; a range of laws, policies and institutions will
to minimize transaction costs?
affect them and thus need to be understood by PWS implementers. They must scrutinize what framework conditions
• When should services be “bundled” to increase payments?
may constitute preconditions for the success of their PWS scheme. Similarly, they must understand what legal and
• How can service users be stimulated to pay?
political factors are to be taken as a given, and will likely define the scope of PWS. Developing this understanding and the
• How important are PWS initiatives for poverty reduction?
room for manoeuvre in the policy environment is critical to gaining social acceptance.
• How can PWS schemes be designed so as to balance efficiency with fairness?
• At what scale are PWS schemes best applied? Q1 Are there certain policy, legal and regulatory changes that are
In presenting the edited results of the Bellagio Conversations, we hope to help other practitioners as they, along always necessary to establish a PWS scheme?
with us, continue to wrestle with the opportunities and challenges of PWS design and implementation. Probably not. PWS schemes need to be developed to fit their particular contexts.
For example, in Heredia, Costa Rica, the PWS scheme was developed based
on existing public utilities regulation. The Catskill program of New York City was
made possible by new uses and interpretations of existing law. Development of
PWS schemes may require legislation, or may best be done through institutional
means. In general, there are political costs to enacting legislation and bureaucratic
costs to working within the existing system. Based on local knowledge and an
assessment of local support and the institutional position of the PWS scheme,
promoters should assess which strategy is preferable. Often, the right answer
will be a combination of both legislative and institutional changes. In circumstances
where it is difficult to foresee any progress on PWS without policy and legal
change, an objective assessment of the prospects of obtaining such change may
lead to the realistic conclusion that it is better to search for alternative policies.
Government-financed PWS: Costa Rica Q2 Are laws establishing private property rights required for user-
The 1996 Forest Law established four primary purposes for Costa Rica’s PES Program: financed PWS schemes?
1) Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions;
2) Hydrologic services; Reasonably clear rights to land access, management or use are certainly needed,
3) Biodiversity conservation; and but this does not necessarily imply western-style ownership rights. Access,
4) Protection of scenic beauty. management and use rights may be customary rather than statuary, and can
The same law established a regulatory framework for contracting with landowners and established the semi-autonomous exist in many forms—both individual and communal. In some PWS schemes,
National Fund for Forest Financing (FONAFIFO). To participate in the program, landowners submit their land title, a plan, notably the RUPES (Rewarding the Upland Poor for Environmental Services)
and a sustainable forest management plan prepared by a licensed forester. Once this plan is approved, specified practices program in South East Asia, changes in land rights have been used as a
(i.e. timber plantation, forest conservation or forest management) must be adopted, which triggers payments. In 2006, compensation tool, i.e. awarding consolidated tenure security to local land users
for example, annual payments for conservation averaged US$64/hectare, while for forest plantations ~US$816/hectare is as a reward for (promised) future environmental services. One of the compensation
disbursed over 10 years. An initial disbursement can be requested upon contract signing, but all subsequent annual payments modes in Bolivia’s Los Negros PWS scheme has been barbed wire, which service
require verification of compliance. The program is funded primarily with revenues from a national tax on fossil fuels, and providers have used to strengthen their de facto property rights. However, changes
the area enrolled represents about 10% of the country’s forests. Lack of customized monitoring data makes precise impact in land use rights are value-laden and complex issues, and are perhaps best
quantifications difficult, but the PES program is likely to have caused at least some modest increase in national forest used only when the need is essential and the solution commands widespread
cover and quality. The program is popular with landowners, with requests to participate far outstripping available financing. public support.
The World Bank supported the scheme’s strengthening and development through the Ecomarkets project.
4 5
7. How do laws and policies affect PWS schemes,
and how can they best be influenced?
on each of the key issues. The primers provided starting points for writing, but the groups were not bound to them. Drafts
were presented to the entire group for comments and editing, until by the end of the fourth day each draft had been co- Government roles in PWS schemes range at best from enabling and implementing and at worst they can be obstructive,
written by at least three authors, and had received comments from multiple participants. but they are rarely avoidable. PWS protagonists should anticipate actively engaging with law and policy institutions in
the process of exploring PWS. Some specific legal and institutional changes are likely to be desirable but may not be
We decided to focus our conversations on currently unresolved PWS issues that are already much discussed globally, and easily addressed at the outset. Thus, PWS implementers should not wait for the perfect legal conditions to be pre-
questions we considered important but are not currently on the global agenda, namely: established, but rather try to influence conditions as they go along.
• How do laws and policies affect PWS schemes, and how can they best be influenced?
• How much research is needed prior to and during PWS implementation? When and how does it make sense
WS schemes do not operate in a legal, social or political vacuum; a range of laws, policies and institutions will
to minimize transaction costs?
affect them and thus need to be understood by PWS implementers. They must scrutinize what framework conditions
• When should services be “bundled” to increase payments?
may constitute preconditions for the success of their PWS scheme. Similarly, they must understand what legal and
• How can service users be stimulated to pay?
political factors are to be taken as a given, and will likely define the scope of PWS. Developing this understanding and the
• How important are PWS initiatives for poverty reduction?
room for manoeuvre in the policy environment is critical to gaining social acceptance.
• How can PWS schemes be designed so as to balance efficiency with fairness?
• At what scale are PWS schemes best applied? Q1 Are there certain policy, legal and regulatory changes that are
In presenting the edited results of the Bellagio Conversations, we hope to help other practitioners as they, along always necessary to establish a PWS scheme?
with us, continue to wrestle with the opportunities and challenges of PWS design and implementation. Probably not. PWS schemes need to be developed to fit their particular contexts.
For example, in Heredia, Costa Rica, the PWS scheme was developed based
on existing public utilities regulation. The Catskill program of New York City was
made possible by new uses and interpretations of existing law. Development of
PWS schemes may require legislation, or may best be done through institutional
means. In general, there are political costs to enacting legislation and bureaucratic
costs to working within the existing system. Based on local knowledge and an
assessment of local support and the institutional position of the PWS scheme,
promoters should assess which strategy is preferable. Often, the right answer
will be a combination of both legislative and institutional changes. In circumstances
where it is difficult to foresee any progress on PWS without policy and legal
change, an objective assessment of the prospects of obtaining such change may
lead to the realistic conclusion that it is better to search for alternative policies.
Government-financed PWS: Costa Rica Q2 Are laws establishing private property rights required for user-
The 1996 Forest Law established four primary purposes for Costa Rica’s PES Program: financed PWS schemes?
1) Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions;
2) Hydrologic services; Reasonably clear rights to land access, management or use are certainly needed,
3) Biodiversity conservation; and but this does not necessarily imply western-style ownership rights. Access,
4) Protection of scenic beauty. management and use rights may be customary rather than statuary, and can
The same law established a regulatory framework for contracting with landowners and established the semi-autonomous exist in many forms—both individual and communal. In some PWS schemes,
National Fund for Forest Financing (FONAFIFO). To participate in the program, landowners submit their land title, a plan, notably the RUPES (Rewarding the Upland Poor for Environmental Services)
and a sustainable forest management plan prepared by a licensed forester. Once this plan is approved, specified practices program in South East Asia, changes in land rights have been used as a
(i.e. timber plantation, forest conservation or forest management) must be adopted, which triggers payments. In 2006, compensation tool, i.e. awarding consolidated tenure security to local land users
for example, annual payments for conservation averaged US$64/hectare, while for forest plantations ~US$816/hectare is as a reward for (promised) future environmental services. One of the compensation
disbursed over 10 years. An initial disbursement can be requested upon contract signing, but all subsequent annual payments modes in Bolivia’s Los Negros PWS scheme has been barbed wire, which service
require verification of compliance. The program is funded primarily with revenues from a national tax on fossil fuels, and providers have used to strengthen their de facto property rights. However, changes
the area enrolled represents about 10% of the country’s forests. Lack of customized monitoring data makes precise impact in land use rights are value-laden and complex issues, and are perhaps best
quantifications difficult, but the PES program is likely to have caused at least some modest increase in national forest used only when the need is essential and the solution commands widespread
cover and quality. The program is popular with landowners, with requests to participate far outstripping available financing. public support.
The World Bank supported the scheme’s strengthening and development through the Ecomarkets project.
4 5
8. Q3 Where should one look to find legal and regulatory guidance for PWS schemes? Q5 Can or should payments be made for activities that are obligatory under law?
In practice, working with existing law is usually the best course, at least initially. Existing laws and regulations may already Several payment schemes around the world are paying land users to conserve forest, even though clearing this forest would
contain part of the legal basis for PWS. The key is to revitalize these laws with public support and clarity for utilizing their be illegal. PWS can enhance compliance with laws banning forest clearing, by co-financing private landowners’ costs of
PWS potential, which may boost legitimacy and support. Alternatively, the path to take will depend on whether existing laws complying with the law. Costa Rica’s 1996 Forest Law simultaneously banned clearing and established a PES scheme
are internally inconsistent, are unenforceable, or conflict with bureaucratic vested interests. compensating landowners for forest conservation. Conversely, laws that ban forest clearing can also provide incentives
for participation in PWS and help justify sanctions for breaking contracts. Although PWS is often seen as an alternative to
Q4 When is legal change necessary or desirable? command-and-control policies, the two types of tools can often complement each other in practice.
Strategic use of legal or regulatory reform can play a key role to: Q6 How can the policy and institutional environment strengthen local institutions and improve PWS
• Establish a new right to a resource implementation?
Zimbabwean legislation that gave communities the right to manage their wild game became the basis for an interlocking
system of communal programs to protect biodiversity.4 In Tanzania, legislation on community forests has helped provide Policy and institutional entry points emphasizing information transparency, decentralization, local financing and planning
incentives for communities to manage watershed regeneration. can all be seized to explore PWS ideas. This, in turn, may build local institutional capacity. In some contexts, governments
can be encouraged to directly facilitate user-financed schemes, or support intermediaries in facilitating and brokering
• Establish a source of funds
negotiations. Where there is bureaucratic space, or where such space can be created, these local ideas and demands can
New legislation in Mexico allocated about 2.5% of existing water fee revenues to support PWS schemes. In Costa Rica,
be fed back into improved government policy.
a surcharge on all fossil fuels paid for forest environmental services and, more recently, 25% of revenue from a new
water fee, were earmarked for PES. However, in practice only a smaller proportion was actually allocated by the Treasury. Q7 How can social and political circumstances best be influenced?
• Authorize new institutions
• PWS promoters need to be aware of trends that support PWS, such as decentralization, regulatory flexibility, and
In China, the government authorized local water users to join together in irrigator associations. Many states in the USA
new service roles. They can then design PWS schemes explicitly to exemplify and support such trends. Similarly,
now authorize government to partner with citizen-based, stream-corridor associations to promote watershed restoration.
they must understand the existing bureaucratic culture and avoid any unnecessary challenges to it. They should
Costa Rica has created a specialized PES institution, FONAFIFO.
seek champions in the existing bureaucracy who share the same goals.
• Create bureaucratic space
• Where key institutions and government functions are poorly integrated, national or state legislation endorsing or
South Africa´s new water act allowed managers to develop a water pricing strategy that recognized the negative impact
authorizing PWS is fundamental. PWS promoters can help develop such legislation by using the results of PWS
of terrestrial invasive alien plants and that their removal enhances the provision of watershed services. In Europe, to
pilot projects as the basis for its design. Moreover, governments are often spurred by PWS concepts and experiments
overcome the focus of agricultural departments on commodity production regardless of environmental consequence, the
to address underlying issues which PWS promoters themselves would be ill advised to focus on. Once government
European Union (EU) passed legislation creating explicit programs of payments for sustainable agriculture.
proposes such a course, however, PWS advocates should participate in the debate over these issues, lest they
• Remove obstacles to PWS schemes wind up becoming obstacles. The EU incorporates many PWS concepts into its agri-environmental funding programs.
To eliminate perverse subsidies that make PWS economically ineffective, a number of states in the USA have repealed
• PWS proponents must seek to convert key critical voices or social interests, such as an urban business community,
laws that tax lands with high biodiversity value in ways that are intended to encourage their development. In the
through arguments that demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of PWS. Where PWS schemes are yet to be started,
Netherlands, the structure of agricultural payments has been altered to encourage local farmer efforts to control nutrient
this may best be done by reference to comparable approaches elsewhere, such as documented benefits of PWS
applications, instead of expanding their use.
in terms of income, development and jobs created.
• Ensure monitoring, compliance and transparency
• Implementers must be aware of the arguments being wielded against PWS in their particular context, e.g. “PWS is merely
Many countries have passed freedom of information laws to ensure that payment streams are public information. In
paying people to obey the law”, “PWS privatises public resources and commoditizes them”, or “PWS favours the rights
Ghana, regulations require amounts of revenue paid to land owners to be made public.
of some against those of others”. Such potentially legitimate concerns need to be addressed within the local context.
One, often prominent, issue is how to deal with squatters, and with ambiguous access and ownership rights to land.
• PWS proponents should recognize and use the lessons from similar schemes elsewhere. Although innovative, PWS
initiatives do have a track record. Both large-scale and small-scale successes exist, providing hope that PWS can be
a cutting-edge tool for sustainability. Both large scale and small-scale failures exist also, and these can be learnt from.
It may be useful to present PWS as a broad strategic environmental and economic approach–demonstrating how the
innovative nature of PWS not only provides new resources for economic development, but also provides a new way to
address long-term intractable problems.
PWS schemes are inherently political; they alter who gets what, when, why and how. The first rule of advocacy politics is
to have a clear and compelling good idea. The second rule is to build as large a network of supporters as possible. The
third rule is to find champions within leadership echelons of local political and institutional structures.
6 4 7
For a case study of the Zimbabwean CAMPFIRE program seen through a PES lens, see Frost and Bond (2008).
9. Q3 Where should one look to find legal and regulatory guidance for PWS schemes? Q5 Can or should payments be made for activities that are obligatory under law?
In practice, working with existing law is usually the best course, at least initially. Existing laws and regulations may already Several payment schemes around the world are paying land users to conserve forest, even though clearing this forest would
contain part of the legal basis for PWS. The key is to revitalize these laws with public support and clarity for utilizing their be illegal. PWS can enhance compliance with laws banning forest clearing, by co-financing private landowners’ costs of
PWS potential, which may boost legitimacy and support. Alternatively, the path to take will depend on whether existing laws complying with the law. Costa Rica’s 1996 Forest Law simultaneously banned clearing and established a PES scheme
are internally inconsistent, are unenforceable, or conflict with bureaucratic vested interests. compensating landowners for forest conservation. Conversely, laws that ban forest clearing can also provide incentives
for participation in PWS and help justify sanctions for breaking contracts. Although PWS is often seen as an alternative to
Q4 When is legal change necessary or desirable? command-and-control policies, the two types of tools can often complement each other in practice.
Strategic use of legal or regulatory reform can play a key role to: Q6 How can the policy and institutional environment strengthen local institutions and improve PWS
• Establish a new right to a resource implementation?
Zimbabwean legislation that gave communities the right to manage their wild game became the basis for an interlocking
system of communal programs to protect biodiversity.4 In Tanzania, legislation on community forests has helped provide Policy and institutional entry points emphasizing information transparency, decentralization, local financing and planning
incentives for communities to manage watershed regeneration. can all be seized to explore PWS ideas. This, in turn, may build local institutional capacity. In some contexts, governments
can be encouraged to directly facilitate user-financed schemes, or support intermediaries in facilitating and brokering
• Establish a source of funds
negotiations. Where there is bureaucratic space, or where such space can be created, these local ideas and demands can
New legislation in Mexico allocated about 2.5% of existing water fee revenues to support PWS schemes. In Costa Rica,
be fed back into improved government policy.
a surcharge on all fossil fuels paid for forest environmental services and, more recently, 25% of revenue from a new
water fee, were earmarked for PES. However, in practice only a smaller proportion was actually allocated by the Treasury. Q7 How can social and political circumstances best be influenced?
• Authorize new institutions
• PWS promoters need to be aware of trends that support PWS, such as decentralization, regulatory flexibility, and
In China, the government authorized local water users to join together in irrigator associations. Many states in the USA
new service roles. They can then design PWS schemes explicitly to exemplify and support such trends. Similarly,
now authorize government to partner with citizen-based, stream-corridor associations to promote watershed restoration.
they must understand the existing bureaucratic culture and avoid any unnecessary challenges to it. They should
Costa Rica has created a specialized PES institution, FONAFIFO.
seek champions in the existing bureaucracy who share the same goals.
• Create bureaucratic space
• Where key institutions and government functions are poorly integrated, national or state legislation endorsing or
South Africa´s new water act allowed managers to develop a water pricing strategy that recognized the negative impact
authorizing PWS is fundamental. PWS promoters can help develop such legislation by using the results of PWS
of terrestrial invasive alien plants and that their removal enhances the provision of watershed services. In Europe, to
pilot projects as the basis for its design. Moreover, governments are often spurred by PWS concepts and experiments
overcome the focus of agricultural departments on commodity production regardless of environmental consequence, the
to address underlying issues which PWS promoters themselves would be ill advised to focus on. Once government
European Union (EU) passed legislation creating explicit programs of payments for sustainable agriculture.
proposes such a course, however, PWS advocates should participate in the debate over these issues, lest they
• Remove obstacles to PWS schemes wind up becoming obstacles. The EU incorporates many PWS concepts into its agri-environmental funding programs.
To eliminate perverse subsidies that make PWS economically ineffective, a number of states in the USA have repealed
• PWS proponents must seek to convert key critical voices or social interests, such as an urban business community,
laws that tax lands with high biodiversity value in ways that are intended to encourage their development. In the
through arguments that demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of PWS. Where PWS schemes are yet to be started,
Netherlands, the structure of agricultural payments has been altered to encourage local farmer efforts to control nutrient
this may best be done by reference to comparable approaches elsewhere, such as documented benefits of PWS
applications, instead of expanding their use.
in terms of income, development and jobs created.
• Ensure monitoring, compliance and transparency
• Implementers must be aware of the arguments being wielded against PWS in their particular context, e.g. “PWS is merely
Many countries have passed freedom of information laws to ensure that payment streams are public information. In
paying people to obey the law”, “PWS privatises public resources and commoditizes them”, or “PWS favours the rights
Ghana, regulations require amounts of revenue paid to land owners to be made public.
of some against those of others”. Such potentially legitimate concerns need to be addressed within the local context.
One, often prominent, issue is how to deal with squatters, and with ambiguous access and ownership rights to land.
• PWS proponents should recognize and use the lessons from similar schemes elsewhere. Although innovative, PWS
initiatives do have a track record. Both large-scale and small-scale successes exist, providing hope that PWS can be
a cutting-edge tool for sustainability. Both large scale and small-scale failures exist also, and these can be learnt from.
It may be useful to present PWS as a broad strategic environmental and economic approach–demonstrating how the
innovative nature of PWS not only provides new resources for economic development, but also provides a new way to
address long-term intractable problems.
PWS schemes are inherently political; they alter who gets what, when, why and how. The first rule of advocacy politics is
to have a clear and compelling good idea. The second rule is to build as large a network of supporters as possible. The
third rule is to find champions within leadership echelons of local political and institutional structures.
6 4 7
For a case study of the Zimbabwean CAMPFIRE program seen through a PES lens, see Frost and Bond (2008).
10. How much research is needed prior to and during PWS implementation?
When and how does it make sense to minimize transaction costs?
Q2 What is the minimum information needed to initiate a user-financed PWS scheme?
Experience suggests a steep learning curve while implementing PWS schemes, especially user-financed pilots at a
watershed scale. For those, it is advisable to not “let the perfect be the enemy of the good”: rather than trying to architect It is always important to have at least an initial understanding of the context of the watershed, even if this is based on little
all the details in advance, one can fine-tune the design and incorporate knowledge as they go along. For government- or no scientifically collected data. Implementers should be able to answer a series of key questions using either the results
financed schemes, significant design adjustments over time may meet much more political opposition. Most existing of new research or with their best available knowledge. The extent to which new research is required to answer these
PWS schemes are based on incomplete knowledge regarding the links between basic land use and hydrology. questions will depend on the local context, resources available, and pre-existing knowledge. Preparatory efforts will thus
differ in each case but experiences demonstrate that some information—particularly in relation to the hydrological basics—
ublic perception about the links between forest conservation or reforestation and water flows are sometimes at is required to at least guide the direction of proposed action:
odds with scientific findings. In addition to “getting the science right”, PWS initiatives need to be based on what • Clarify the hydrological uses that potential buyers are
local stakeholders perceive to be logical, fair and feasible. Scientific knowledge should thus be integrated with interested in receiving
indigenous knowledge systems. PWS implementation should always be accompanied by some measurement of the water These may include: drinking water, hydropower, irrigation
services delivered, but it is vital to point out in advance that PWS schemes cannot assure a certain outcome at any point agriculture, industrial water use, recreational use, and aquatic
in time—be it improved water quality or higher water yields—because of the influence of third factors. Usually PWS schemes biodiversity protection.
augment the probability of a desired service-delivery outcome.
• Identify the specific hydrological service(s) upon which each
service user depends
Q1 Given that high quality research is costly, is it possible to initiate a PWS scheme with little or no
These services include the enhancement of stream flow quantity,
scientific research, leaving critical studies for later?
control of its variability and quality (including sediments, pathogens,
As a PWS program matures, it may steadily require more sophisticated information and an engagement with complex issues, nutrients, and pollutants) and risk management (including flood,
which will increasingly require more formal research tools. However, the initial need for most PWS schemes is simply landslide and erosion prevention).
sufficient knowledge to begin in a responsible way: this may not require complex, time-consuming studies. Indeed, it may
• Develop a baseline against which to broadly assess
well be feasible to get started on a watershed scale PWS scheme without spending large amounts of money or time. The
hydrological service delivery
type of PWS initiative to be implemented will largely determine research needs. See the following text box for a guide to
This baseline may be based on empirical data, modelling
how much research is needed a priori for some common types of PWS schemes.
such as the RUPES Rapid Hydrological Appraisal
developed in Asia or SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment
Simple rules of thumb on research needs Tool) models. If no data are available, locally gathered
qualitative information can be helpful.
The important first step is to identify the likely solution to the water problem: what type of PWS mechanism needs
to be implemented? Most PWS solutions will likely involve either: • Scrutinize probable livelihood scenarios with and without
PWS implementation
If the solution is to maintain water quality or quantity by conserving
Maintaining the ecosystem Attention must be given to the limitations and opportunities relating
currently threatened vegetation, it might be possible to simply
in its current state start setting up the mechanism based on the precautionary to different socio-economic groups, given their production and
principle, and leave more detailed research until later. management practices. This can either come from a detailed
investigation or from in-depth local knowledge.
If the aim is ecosystem restoration to improve water quality, • Establish a basis for setting a price for the provision of
then research is required to demonstrate biogeochemical the service
linkages, develop economic cost functions and evaluate how Relevant parameters can be the opportunity costs of
or much restoration is cost-effective, to establish if a PWS
mechanism is biophysically and economically feasible. land and labour; water tariffs and stated willingness to
pay for water improvement; and outcomes from direct
negotiations between service buyers and sellers. It is
If ecosystem restoration is designed to improve water quantity,
Restoring the ecosystem and if no site-specific scientific or local information is already important to ensure that the value of the service in
(regenerating soil and available to support the case for a PWS mechanism, then demand is likely to exceed the opportunity costs;
vegetation functions) getting such evidence will likely be expensive and time otherwise there is no economic basis for a PWS scheme.
consuming. The wisest initial course of action may be to
undertake a series of inexpensive “no-regret” actions such as • Identify governance constraints and opportunities in
keeping cows away from compacting springs and riverbanks. the political environment
Research will then be required to decide whether or not to This refers to the factors explained in detail in the
implement a full-scale PWS scheme.
previous section.
8 9
11. How much research is needed prior to and during PWS implementation?
When and how does it make sense to minimize transaction costs?
Q2 What is the minimum information needed to initiate a user-financed PWS scheme?
Experience suggests a steep learning curve while implementing PWS schemes, especially user-financed pilots at a
watershed scale. For those, it is advisable to not “let the perfect be the enemy of the good”: rather than trying to architect It is always important to have at least an initial understanding of the context of the watershed, even if this is based on little
all the details in advance, one can fine-tune the design and incorporate knowledge as they go along. For government- or no scientifically collected data. Implementers should be able to answer a series of key questions using either the results
financed schemes, significant design adjustments over time may meet much more political opposition. Most existing of new research or with their best available knowledge. The extent to which new research is required to answer these
PWS schemes are based on incomplete knowledge regarding the links between basic land use and hydrology. questions will depend on the local context, resources available, and pre-existing knowledge. Preparatory efforts will thus
differ in each case but experiences demonstrate that some information—particularly in relation to the hydrological basics—
ublic perception about the links between forest conservation or reforestation and water flows are sometimes at is required to at least guide the direction of proposed action:
odds with scientific findings. In addition to “getting the science right”, PWS initiatives need to be based on what • Clarify the hydrological uses that potential buyers are
local stakeholders perceive to be logical, fair and feasible. Scientific knowledge should thus be integrated with interested in receiving
indigenous knowledge systems. PWS implementation should always be accompanied by some measurement of the water These may include: drinking water, hydropower, irrigation
services delivered, but it is vital to point out in advance that PWS schemes cannot assure a certain outcome at any point agriculture, industrial water use, recreational use, and aquatic
in time—be it improved water quality or higher water yields—because of the influence of third factors. Usually PWS schemes biodiversity protection.
augment the probability of a desired service-delivery outcome.
• Identify the specific hydrological service(s) upon which each
service user depends
Q1 Given that high quality research is costly, is it possible to initiate a PWS scheme with little or no
These services include the enhancement of stream flow quantity,
scientific research, leaving critical studies for later?
control of its variability and quality (including sediments, pathogens,
As a PWS program matures, it may steadily require more sophisticated information and an engagement with complex issues, nutrients, and pollutants) and risk management (including flood,
which will increasingly require more formal research tools. However, the initial need for most PWS schemes is simply landslide and erosion prevention).
sufficient knowledge to begin in a responsible way: this may not require complex, time-consuming studies. Indeed, it may
• Develop a baseline against which to broadly assess
well be feasible to get started on a watershed scale PWS scheme without spending large amounts of money or time. The
hydrological service delivery
type of PWS initiative to be implemented will largely determine research needs. See the following text box for a guide to
This baseline may be based on empirical data, modelling
how much research is needed a priori for some common types of PWS schemes.
such as the RUPES Rapid Hydrological Appraisal
developed in Asia or SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment
Simple rules of thumb on research needs Tool) models. If no data are available, locally gathered
qualitative information can be helpful.
The important first step is to identify the likely solution to the water problem: what type of PWS mechanism needs
to be implemented? Most PWS solutions will likely involve either: • Scrutinize probable livelihood scenarios with and without
PWS implementation
If the solution is to maintain water quality or quantity by conserving
Maintaining the ecosystem Attention must be given to the limitations and opportunities relating
currently threatened vegetation, it might be possible to simply
in its current state start setting up the mechanism based on the precautionary to different socio-economic groups, given their production and
principle, and leave more detailed research until later. management practices. This can either come from a detailed
investigation or from in-depth local knowledge.
If the aim is ecosystem restoration to improve water quality, • Establish a basis for setting a price for the provision of
then research is required to demonstrate biogeochemical the service
linkages, develop economic cost functions and evaluate how Relevant parameters can be the opportunity costs of
or much restoration is cost-effective, to establish if a PWS
mechanism is biophysically and economically feasible. land and labour; water tariffs and stated willingness to
pay for water improvement; and outcomes from direct
negotiations between service buyers and sellers. It is
If ecosystem restoration is designed to improve water quantity,
Restoring the ecosystem and if no site-specific scientific or local information is already important to ensure that the value of the service in
(regenerating soil and available to support the case for a PWS mechanism, then demand is likely to exceed the opportunity costs;
vegetation functions) getting such evidence will likely be expensive and time otherwise there is no economic basis for a PWS scheme.
consuming. The wisest initial course of action may be to
undertake a series of inexpensive “no-regret” actions such as • Identify governance constraints and opportunities in
keeping cows away from compacting springs and riverbanks. the political environment
Research will then be required to decide whether or not to This refers to the factors explained in detail in the
implement a full-scale PWS scheme.
previous section.
8 9