PADM 550 Research Paper Grading Rubric Page 1 of 2 speaks to whether government has the authority from God, the people and from the Constitution—to MAY act on the issue and the policy initiative. That is the first question we ask as policy makers. It could be that other spheres such as churches, non-profits, businesses, local communities, etc. have the authority to act on the policy issue. It may fall in the realm of just one of those spheres but it is likely that many spheres will be involved in some form of cooperation. speaks to whether it is feasible to address the issue. We consider the question of whether we have CAN sufficient physical, political, and financial resources to solve the problem or implement the policy initiative. Policy solutions do not occur in a vacuum; most issues come with much debate and sometimes even acrimony. A wise Christian policy maker understands the political implications behind any decision, including how the press will cover the issue and communicate intentions from the stakeholder and how the opposition will seek to undermine and discredit the agenda. Once we know we have the authority (May) and the resources (Can), we ask practical/pragmatic SHOULD questions of how best to solve the problem or implement the solution. To do so, we use the policy analysis process listed above. To some extent, the Can and Should portions of the analysis have to occur simultaneously. Finally, the May portion of the analysis also prescribes how one develops political strategies (Can). For instance, Biblically, we are called to act with integrity and humility. Further, how one defines the nature of the problem itself (Should) is the result of worldview assumptions—Biblical or otherwise. CAN: "Feasibility" • Finanicial Feasibility: Do we have the financial resources? • Phyiscal Feasilibity: do we have the resources? • Political Feasibility: do we have the political capital? SHOULD: Timing, Strategy • Policy Analysis Process: 1) Define and Analyze the Problem, 2) ; Construct Policy Alternatives; 3) Develop Evaluative Criteria; 4) Assess alternatives in light of the criteria; and 5) Choose the appropriate alternative(s) • Logisticis: what is the best way to implement a solution. • Timing: what is the best time to implement a solution MAY: • Does government have the authority to address this issue or implement the particular policy in question? • If so, where does it get its authority? (Law of Nature and Nature’s God, the people, the Constitution) Running Head: YOUR PAPER TITLE YOUR PAPER TITLE HERE 2 Your Paper Title Your Name Date Class Name and Section Dr. Kahlib Fischer Abstract Defining the Problem Overview Impacts Root Causes Competing Interpretations Policy Alternatives Policy Alternative 1 Comment by Fischer, Kahlib: Change each of these headings to reflect the names of the actual policy alternatives..