González de Prado C, Iglesias X, Anguera MT.
    TACTICAL MOVES IN TOP-LEVEL COMPETITION
    TAEKWONDO COMBAT: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY. I
    2011 SCIENTIFIC CONGRESS ON MARTIAL ARTS
    AND COMBAT SPORTS (Visu, Portugal). Maig, 2011.




                       cgonza22@xtec.cat




Sport Sciences Research Group INEFC Barcelona

Grup de Recerca en Ciències de l'Esport INEFC Barcelona
Grup Consolidat (2009 SGR1054)

Institut Nacional d’Educació Física de Catalunya
Av. de l’Estadi, 12 22
08038 Barcelona (Spain)

+34 93 425 54 45               grce@gencat.cat            @Recerca_INEFC
TACTICAL MOVES IN TOP-LEVEL COMPETITION
                  TOP LEVEL
TAEKWONDO COMBAT: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY

             GONZÁLEZ DE PRADO, C
                 IGLESIAS, X
                ANGUERA, MT
1. Introduction                                              2/11
2. Aim
3. Methodology
4. Results
5. Conclusions             CHAMPIONSHIPS
                              2001 2007
                        4 World Championships
                            2 World Cups



                          WEIGHT CATEGORY
                                                TOTAL MOVES
                          8 Male Competitors
                                                   4962


                                COMBATS
                                 48 Final
                               96 Finalists
                             29 Nationalities

C. González, X. Iglesias, M.T. Anguera
2. Aim                                                   3/11

3. Methodology
4.
4 Results
5. Conclusions




                       Characterize moves in top level
                                  Taekwondo combat
          Descriptive


              Results
                  l



C. González, X. Iglesias, M.T. Anguera
3. Methodology                                                             4/11
4. Results
5.
5 Conclusions


                                         OBSERVATIONAL
                                            Systematic

                                          Non partipant

                                         (Anguera, 2008)
                APPROACH                                   TOOL “ad hoc”

                 Idiographic                               Observation

           Applying a follow up                            Registration
                                                             g

             Multidimensional
                                                            Reliability
                                                                      y
(Anguera, M.T., Blanco, A., Losada, J.L., 2001)              Validity




C. González, X. Iglesias, M.T. Anguera
3. Methodology                                         5/11
4. Results
5.
5 Conclusions                            Drewtina 23




C. González, X. Iglesias, M.T. Anguera
4. Results                                                                                  6/11

5. Conclusions


                                            TOTAL MOVES PERFORMED

     CHAMPIONSHIPS               WEIGHT CATEGORY          NATIONALITY       TRUNK PROTECTOR
        Density
        Beijing (2007)               Light
                                     Li ht (67 72k )
                                               72kg)     Taiwan Th il d
                                                         T i    Thailand       Red (H
                                                                               R d (Hong)
                                                                                        )
             16.7                        14.05%            7.22 7.16 %          50.17%

         Tokio (2002)
           ki (     )                    Fly (54 58kg)   Nederland Brazil     Blue (Chong)
             11.1                           11.41%        2.53 4.12 %            49.83%




C. González, X. Iglesias, M.T. Anguera
4. Results                                                                              7/11

5. Conclusions

                                          TOTAL MOVES PERFORMED

                                         45
          % ROUNDS
                                         40
     1     37.75 41.13                   35
                                         30
     2      31.91 29.74                  25
                                                                                      <2004
                                         20
                                                                                      >2004
     3      30.33 28.66                  15
                                         10
     4                 0.14               5
                                          0
                                              Round 1
                                              R   d     Round 2
                                                        R   d     Round 3
                                                                  R   d     Round 4
                                                                            R   d




C. González, X. Iglesias, M.T. Anguera
4. Results                                                                                8/11

5. Conclusions
                                TOTAL MOVES
                                         4962                         TECHNICAL MOVE
                                                                    Bandal chagui 76 71%
                                                                                   76.71%
             PENALTIES                             TACTICAL          Miro chagui 9.57%
                                                                      Tuit chagui 5.06%
            3.35% (n=166)
                  (     )                       96.65% (n=4796)
                                                       (      )


               Reasons                            Offenssives         Kicks 81.41%
           Falling ground
                                                78.81% (n=3779)      Punches 0.74%
           Crossing safety
           boundary line                                              Feints 14 06%
                                                                             14.06%

               kyongo
                                                  Defensives         Dodges 41 58%
                                                                            41.58%
              59 points=
             118 kyongos                        21.19% (n=1016)   Confrontations 58.42%



C. González, X. Iglesias, M.T. Anguera
4. Results                                                                             9/11

5. Conclusions

                                          ATTACK (48.02%)      COUNTERATTACK (51.98%)
                                           Direct: 59 62%
                                                   59.62%           Direct: 82 53%
                                                                            82.53%

                                                                  Simultaneous 64.81%



                                          Right leg: 50.68%   Competition area 92.08%


                                         Guard back: 70.63%   Trunk protector 92.53%


                                         EFFECTIVE MOVES               SCOREBOARD
                                             15.46%                    Equal 26 12%
                                                                       E    l 26.12%
                                                                       Won 35.46%
                                                                        Lost 38.42%


C. González, X. Iglesias, M.T. Anguera
5. Conclusions                                                                             10/11




       GUIDANCE TRAINING                  To Train for

         Not effective 84.54%
               Safety area

                 Bandal
                  Miro
                  Tuit

              Direct
       Attack/Counterattack

            Simultaneous
            Counterattack



   Systematic observational analysis is a useful tool in taekwondo training. Drewtina 23
C. González, X. Iglesias, M.T. Anguera
THANK YOU

Oral portugal tk_2011

  • 1.
    González de PradoC, Iglesias X, Anguera MT. TACTICAL MOVES IN TOP-LEVEL COMPETITION TAEKWONDO COMBAT: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY. I 2011 SCIENTIFIC CONGRESS ON MARTIAL ARTS AND COMBAT SPORTS (Visu, Portugal). Maig, 2011. cgonza22@xtec.cat Sport Sciences Research Group INEFC Barcelona Grup de Recerca en Ciències de l'Esport INEFC Barcelona Grup Consolidat (2009 SGR1054) Institut Nacional d’Educació Física de Catalunya Av. de l’Estadi, 12 22 08038 Barcelona (Spain) +34 93 425 54 45 grce@gencat.cat @Recerca_INEFC
  • 2.
    TACTICAL MOVES INTOP-LEVEL COMPETITION TOP LEVEL TAEKWONDO COMBAT: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY GONZÁLEZ DE PRADO, C IGLESIAS, X ANGUERA, MT
  • 3.
    1. Introduction 2/11 2. Aim 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Conclusions CHAMPIONSHIPS 2001 2007 4 World Championships 2 World Cups WEIGHT CATEGORY TOTAL MOVES 8 Male Competitors 4962 COMBATS 48 Final 96 Finalists 29 Nationalities C. González, X. Iglesias, M.T. Anguera
  • 4.
    2. Aim 3/11 3. Methodology 4. 4 Results 5. Conclusions Characterize moves in top level Taekwondo combat Descriptive Results l C. González, X. Iglesias, M.T. Anguera
  • 5.
    3. Methodology 4/11 4. Results 5. 5 Conclusions OBSERVATIONAL Systematic Non partipant (Anguera, 2008) APPROACH TOOL “ad hoc” Idiographic Observation Applying a follow up Registration g Multidimensional Reliability y (Anguera, M.T., Blanco, A., Losada, J.L., 2001) Validity C. González, X. Iglesias, M.T. Anguera
  • 6.
    3. Methodology 5/11 4. Results 5. 5 Conclusions Drewtina 23 C. González, X. Iglesias, M.T. Anguera
  • 7.
    4. Results 6/11 5. Conclusions TOTAL MOVES PERFORMED CHAMPIONSHIPS WEIGHT CATEGORY NATIONALITY TRUNK PROTECTOR Density Beijing (2007) Light Li ht (67 72k ) 72kg) Taiwan Th il d T i Thailand Red (H R d (Hong) ) 16.7 14.05% 7.22 7.16 % 50.17% Tokio (2002) ki ( ) Fly (54 58kg) Nederland Brazil Blue (Chong) 11.1 11.41% 2.53 4.12 % 49.83% C. González, X. Iglesias, M.T. Anguera
  • 8.
    4. Results 7/11 5. Conclusions TOTAL MOVES PERFORMED 45 % ROUNDS 40 1 37.75 41.13 35 30 2 31.91 29.74 25 <2004 20 >2004 3 30.33 28.66 15 10 4 0.14 5 0 Round 1 R d Round 2 R d Round 3 R d Round 4 R d C. González, X. Iglesias, M.T. Anguera
  • 9.
    4. Results 8/11 5. Conclusions TOTAL MOVES 4962 TECHNICAL MOVE Bandal chagui 76 71% 76.71% PENALTIES TACTICAL Miro chagui 9.57% Tuit chagui 5.06% 3.35% (n=166) ( ) 96.65% (n=4796) ( ) Reasons Offenssives Kicks 81.41% Falling ground 78.81% (n=3779) Punches 0.74% Crossing safety boundary line Feints 14 06% 14.06% kyongo Defensives Dodges 41 58% 41.58% 59 points= 118 kyongos 21.19% (n=1016) Confrontations 58.42% C. González, X. Iglesias, M.T. Anguera
  • 10.
    4. Results 9/11 5. Conclusions ATTACK (48.02%) COUNTERATTACK (51.98%) Direct: 59 62% 59.62% Direct: 82 53% 82.53% Simultaneous 64.81% Right leg: 50.68% Competition area 92.08% Guard back: 70.63% Trunk protector 92.53% EFFECTIVE MOVES SCOREBOARD 15.46% Equal 26 12% E l 26.12% Won 35.46% Lost 38.42% C. González, X. Iglesias, M.T. Anguera
  • 11.
    5. Conclusions 10/11 GUIDANCE TRAINING To Train for Not effective 84.54% Safety area Bandal Miro Tuit Direct Attack/Counterattack Simultaneous Counterattack Systematic observational analysis is a useful tool in taekwondo training. Drewtina 23 C. González, X. Iglesias, M.T. Anguera
  • 12.