Submit Search
Upload
Operating Systems Chapter 6 silberschatz
•
Download as PPTX, PDF
•
0 likes
•
1,719 views
G
GiulianoRanauro
Follow
Operating Systems Chapter 6 silberschatz
Read less
Read more
Engineering
Report
Share
Report
Share
1 of 61
Download now
Recommended
Chapter 10 Operating Systems silberschatz
Chapter 10 Operating Systems silberschatz
GiulianoRanauro
Chapter 2: Operating System Structures
Chapter 2: Operating System Structures
Shafaan Khaliq Bhatti
Chapter 3: Processes
Chapter 3: Processes
Shafaan Khaliq Bhatti
Operating Systems - "Chapter 4: Multithreaded Programming"
Operating Systems - "Chapter 4: Multithreaded Programming"
Ra'Fat Al-Msie'deen
Memory : operating system ( Btech cse )
Memory : operating system ( Btech cse )
HimanshuSharma1389
Lecture#5
Lecture#5
Adil Alpkoçak
Chapter 9 Operating Systems silberschatz
Chapter 9 Operating Systems silberschatz
GiulianoRanauro
Chapter 7
Chapter 7
Amin Omi
Recommended
Chapter 10 Operating Systems silberschatz
Chapter 10 Operating Systems silberschatz
GiulianoRanauro
Chapter 2: Operating System Structures
Chapter 2: Operating System Structures
Shafaan Khaliq Bhatti
Chapter 3: Processes
Chapter 3: Processes
Shafaan Khaliq Bhatti
Operating Systems - "Chapter 4: Multithreaded Programming"
Operating Systems - "Chapter 4: Multithreaded Programming"
Ra'Fat Al-Msie'deen
Memory : operating system ( Btech cse )
Memory : operating system ( Btech cse )
HimanshuSharma1389
Lecture#5
Lecture#5
Adil Alpkoçak
Chapter 9 Operating Systems silberschatz
Chapter 9 Operating Systems silberschatz
GiulianoRanauro
Chapter 7
Chapter 7
Amin Omi
Chapter 1: Introduction to Operating System
Chapter 1: Introduction to Operating System
Shafaan Khaliq Bhatti
Operating Systems - "Chapter 5 Process Synchronization"
Operating Systems - "Chapter 5 Process Synchronization"
Ra'Fat Al-Msie'deen
Unit II - 3 - Operating System - Process Synchronization
Unit II - 3 - Operating System - Process Synchronization
cscarcas
Timestamp protocols
Timestamp protocols
Prashant Saini
Chapter 7 - Deadlocks
Chapter 7 - Deadlocks
Wayne Jones Jnr
Process synchronization
Process synchronization
Ali Ahmad
Inter Process Communication
Inter Process Communication
Anil Kumar Pugalia
Parallel programming using MPI
Parallel programming using MPI
Ajit Nayak
Ch1-Operating System Concepts
Ch1-Operating System Concepts
Muhammad Bilal Tariq
Operating systems chapter 5 silberschatz
Operating systems chapter 5 silberschatz
GiulianoRanauro
Cs8493 unit 1
Cs8493 unit 1
Kathirvel Ayyaswamy
CPU Scheduling in OS Presentation
CPU Scheduling in OS Presentation
usmankiyani1
Memory Management in OS
Memory Management in OS
Kumar Pritam
Chapter 2 - Operating System Structures
Chapter 2 - Operating System Structures
Wayne Jones Jnr
5 process synchronization
5 process synchronization
BaliThorat1
Deadlock
Deadlock
Mohd Arif
Process state in OS
Process state in OS
Khushboo Jain
Contiguous Memory Allocation.ppt
Contiguous Memory Allocation.ppt
infomerlin
Distributed & parallel system
Distributed & parallel system
Manish Singh
Os unit 3 , process management
Os unit 3 , process management
Arnav Chowdhury
ch6.ppt
ch6.ppt
MaxJoker2
process synchronisation operating system
process synchronisation operating system
codefast
More Related Content
What's hot
Chapter 1: Introduction to Operating System
Chapter 1: Introduction to Operating System
Shafaan Khaliq Bhatti
Operating Systems - "Chapter 5 Process Synchronization"
Operating Systems - "Chapter 5 Process Synchronization"
Ra'Fat Al-Msie'deen
Unit II - 3 - Operating System - Process Synchronization
Unit II - 3 - Operating System - Process Synchronization
cscarcas
Timestamp protocols
Timestamp protocols
Prashant Saini
Chapter 7 - Deadlocks
Chapter 7 - Deadlocks
Wayne Jones Jnr
Process synchronization
Process synchronization
Ali Ahmad
Inter Process Communication
Inter Process Communication
Anil Kumar Pugalia
Parallel programming using MPI
Parallel programming using MPI
Ajit Nayak
Ch1-Operating System Concepts
Ch1-Operating System Concepts
Muhammad Bilal Tariq
Operating systems chapter 5 silberschatz
Operating systems chapter 5 silberschatz
GiulianoRanauro
Cs8493 unit 1
Cs8493 unit 1
Kathirvel Ayyaswamy
CPU Scheduling in OS Presentation
CPU Scheduling in OS Presentation
usmankiyani1
Memory Management in OS
Memory Management in OS
Kumar Pritam
Chapter 2 - Operating System Structures
Chapter 2 - Operating System Structures
Wayne Jones Jnr
5 process synchronization
5 process synchronization
BaliThorat1
Deadlock
Deadlock
Mohd Arif
Process state in OS
Process state in OS
Khushboo Jain
Contiguous Memory Allocation.ppt
Contiguous Memory Allocation.ppt
infomerlin
Distributed & parallel system
Distributed & parallel system
Manish Singh
Os unit 3 , process management
Os unit 3 , process management
Arnav Chowdhury
What's hot
(20)
Chapter 1: Introduction to Operating System
Chapter 1: Introduction to Operating System
Operating Systems - "Chapter 5 Process Synchronization"
Operating Systems - "Chapter 5 Process Synchronization"
Unit II - 3 - Operating System - Process Synchronization
Unit II - 3 - Operating System - Process Synchronization
Timestamp protocols
Timestamp protocols
Chapter 7 - Deadlocks
Chapter 7 - Deadlocks
Process synchronization
Process synchronization
Inter Process Communication
Inter Process Communication
Parallel programming using MPI
Parallel programming using MPI
Ch1-Operating System Concepts
Ch1-Operating System Concepts
Operating systems chapter 5 silberschatz
Operating systems chapter 5 silberschatz
Cs8493 unit 1
Cs8493 unit 1
CPU Scheduling in OS Presentation
CPU Scheduling in OS Presentation
Memory Management in OS
Memory Management in OS
Chapter 2 - Operating System Structures
Chapter 2 - Operating System Structures
5 process synchronization
5 process synchronization
Deadlock
Deadlock
Process state in OS
Process state in OS
Contiguous Memory Allocation.ppt
Contiguous Memory Allocation.ppt
Distributed & parallel system
Distributed & parallel system
Os unit 3 , process management
Os unit 3 , process management
Similar to Operating Systems Chapter 6 silberschatz
ch6.ppt
ch6.ppt
MaxJoker2
process synchronisation operating system
process synchronisation operating system
codefast
chapter4.pptx
chapter4.pptx
alisou77666
ch6_EN_BK_syn1.pdf
ch6_EN_BK_syn1.pdf
HoNguyn746501
ch5 [Autosaved].ppt
ch5 [Autosaved].ppt
monirJihad2
ch5.ppt Operating System Ppt for ptu student
ch5.ppt Operating System Ppt for ptu student
BhartiRani14
Operating System-Process Synchronization
Operating System-Process Synchronization
bismahmalik22
ch5.ppt
ch5.ppt
vijay974055
ch5.ppt
ch5.ppt
karinaabyys
Process Synchronization
Process Synchronization
K Gowsic Gowsic
chapter5 processes of synchronizatio ppt
chapter5 processes of synchronizatio ppt
Abdikani34
ch5-Process_Synchronization.pdf
ch5-Process_Synchronization.pdf
sharada3
ch5.ppt operating system
ch5.ppt operating system
Sami Mughal
Chapter 6
Chapter 6
Ahmad Alarbeed
ch05.ppt
ch05.ppt
RohitPaul71
Process Synchronisation Operating System
Process Synchronisation Operating System
DRAnithaSofiaLizCSES
05-Process-Synchronization.pdf
05-Process-Synchronization.pdf
milisjojo
PS.ppt
PS.ppt
DrCMeenakshiVISTAS
ch6-1.ppt
ch6-1.ppt
ssuserc35fa4
Process synchonization : operating system ( Btech cse )
Process synchonization : operating system ( Btech cse )
HimanshuSharma1389
Similar to Operating Systems Chapter 6 silberschatz
(20)
ch6.ppt
ch6.ppt
process synchronisation operating system
process synchronisation operating system
chapter4.pptx
chapter4.pptx
ch6_EN_BK_syn1.pdf
ch6_EN_BK_syn1.pdf
ch5 [Autosaved].ppt
ch5 [Autosaved].ppt
ch5.ppt Operating System Ppt for ptu student
ch5.ppt Operating System Ppt for ptu student
Operating System-Process Synchronization
Operating System-Process Synchronization
ch5.ppt
ch5.ppt
ch5.ppt
ch5.ppt
Process Synchronization
Process Synchronization
chapter5 processes of synchronizatio ppt
chapter5 processes of synchronizatio ppt
ch5-Process_Synchronization.pdf
ch5-Process_Synchronization.pdf
ch5.ppt operating system
ch5.ppt operating system
Chapter 6
Chapter 6
ch05.ppt
ch05.ppt
Process Synchronisation Operating System
Process Synchronisation Operating System
05-Process-Synchronization.pdf
05-Process-Synchronization.pdf
PS.ppt
PS.ppt
ch6-1.ppt
ch6-1.ppt
Process synchonization : operating system ( Btech cse )
Process synchonization : operating system ( Btech cse )
Recently uploaded
Application of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptx
Application of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptx
959SahilShah
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
GDSCAESB
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
rehmti665
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
Asst.prof M.Gokilavani
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
britheesh05
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptx
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptx
João Esperancinha
young call girls in Rajiv Chowk🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
young call girls in Rajiv Chowk🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
9953056974 Low Rate Call Girls In Saket, Delhi NCR
HARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IV
HARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IV
RajaP95
Call Girls Narol 7397865700 Independent Call Girls
Call Girls Narol 7397865700 Independent Call Girls
ssuser7cb4ff
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdf
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdf
me23b1001
young call girls in Green Park🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
young call girls in Green Park🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
9953056974 Low Rate Call Girls In Saket, Delhi NCR
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...
9953056974 Low Rate Call Girls In Saket, Delhi NCR
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptx
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptx
PoojaBan
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ
Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...
Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdf
Asst.prof M.Gokilavani
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
hassan khalil
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...
srsj9000
UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)
UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)
Dr SOUNDIRARAJ N
Concrete Mix Design - IS 10262-2019 - .pptx
Concrete Mix Design - IS 10262-2019 - .pptx
KartikeyaDwivedi3
Recently uploaded
(20)
Application of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptx
Application of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptx
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptx
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptx
young call girls in Rajiv Chowk🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
young call girls in Rajiv Chowk🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
HARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IV
HARMONY IN THE NATURE AND EXISTENCE - Unit-IV
Call Girls Narol 7397865700 Independent Call Girls
Call Girls Narol 7397865700 Independent Call Girls
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdf
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdf
young call girls in Green Park🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
young call girls in Green Park🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptx
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptx
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...
Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...
Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdf
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...
Gfe Mayur Vihar Call Girls Service WhatsApp -> 9999965857 Available 24x7 ^ De...
UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)
UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)
Concrete Mix Design - IS 10262-2019 - .pptx
Concrete Mix Design - IS 10262-2019 - .pptx
Operating Systems Chapter 6 silberschatz
1.
Silberschatz, Galvin and
Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Chapter 6: Synchronization Tools
2.
6.2 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Outline Background The Critical-Section Problem Peterson’s Solution Hardware Support for Synchronization Mutex Locks Semaphores Monitors Liveness Evaluation
3.
6.3 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Objectives Describe the critical-section problem and illustrate a race condition Illustrate hardware solutions to the critical-section problem using memory barriers, compare-and-swap operations, and atomic variables Demonstrate how mutex locks, semaphores, monitors, and condition variables can be used to solve the critical section problem Evaluate tools that solve the critical-section problem in low-, Moderate-, and high-contention scenarios
4.
6.4 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Background Processes can execute concurrently • May be interrupted at any time, partially completing execution Concurrent access to shared data may result in data inconsistency Maintaining data consistency requires mechanisms to ensure the orderly execution of cooperating processes We illustrated in chapter 4 the problem when we considered the Bounded Buffer problem with use of a counter that is updated concurrently by the producer and consumer,. Which lead to race condition.
5.
6.5 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Race Condition Processes P0 and P1 are creating child processes using the fork() system call Race condition on kernel variable next_available_pid which represents the next available process identifier (pid) Unless there is a mechanism to prevent P0 and P1 from accessing the variable next_available_pid the same pid could be assigned to two different processes!
6.
6.6 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Critical Section Problem Consider system of n processes {p0, p1, … pn-1} Each process has critical section segment of code • Process may be changing common variables, updating table, writing file, etc. • When one process in critical section, no other may be in its critical section Critical section problem is to design protocol to solve this Each process must ask permission to enter critical section in entry section, may follow critical section with exit section, then remainder section
7.
6.7 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Critical Section General structure of process Pi
8.
6.8 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Critical-Section Problem (Cont.) 1. Mutual Exclusion - If process Pi is executing in its critical section, then no other processes can be executing in their critical sections 2. Progress - If no process is executing in its critical section and there exist some processes that wish to enter their critical section, then the selection of the process that will enter the critical section next cannot be postponed indefinitely 3. Bounded Waiting - A bound must exist on the number of times that other processes are allowed to enter their critical sections after a process has made a request to enter its critical section and before that request is granted • Assume that each process executes at a nonzero speed • No assumption concerning relative speed of the n processes Requirements for solution to critical-section problem
9.
6.9 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Interrupt-based Solution Entry section: disable interrupts Exit section: enable interrupts Will this solve the problem? • What if the critical section is code that runs for an hour? • Can some processes starve – never enter their critical section. • What if there are two CPUs?
10.
6.10 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Software Solution 1 Two process solution Assume that the load and store machine-language instructions are atomic; that is, cannot be interrupted The two processes share one variable: • int turn; The variable turn indicates whose turn it is to enter the critical section initially, the value of turn is set to i
11.
6.11 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Algorithm for Process Pi while (true){ while (turn = = j); /* critical section */ turn = j; /* remainder section */ }
12.
6.12 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Correctness of the Software Solution Mutual exclusion is preserved Pi enters critical section only if: turn = i and turn cannot be both 0 and 1 at the same time What about the Progress requirement? What about the Bounded-waiting requirement?
13.
6.13 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Peterson’s Solution Two process solution Assume that the load and store machine-language instructions are atomic; that is, cannot be interrupted The two processes share two variables: • int turn; • boolean flag[2] The variable turn indicates whose turn it is to enter the critical section The flag array is used to indicate if a process is ready to enter the critical section. • flag[i] = true implies that process Pi is ready!
14.
6.14 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Algorithm for Process Pi while (true){ flag[i] = true; turn = j; while (flag[j] && turn = = j) ; /* critical section */ flag[i] = false; /* remainder section */ }
15.
6.15 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Correctness of Peterson’s Solution Provable that the three CS requirement are met: 1. Mutual exclusion is preserved Pi enters CS only if: either flag[j] = false or turn = i 2. Progress requirement is satisfied 3. Bounded-waiting requirement is met
16.
6.16 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Peterson’s Solution and Modern Architecture Although useful for demonstrating an algorithm, Peterson’s Solution is not guaranteed to work on modern architectures. • To improve performance, processors and/or compilers may reorder operations that have no dependencies Understanding why it will not work is useful for better understanding race conditions. For single-threaded this is ok as the result will always be the same. For multithreaded the reordering may produce inconsistent or unexpected results!
17.
6.17 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Modern Architecture Example Two threads share the data: boolean flag = false; int x = 0; Thread 1 performs while (!flag) ; print x Thread 2 performs x = 100; flag = true What is the expected output? 100
18.
6.18 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Modern Architecture Example (Cont.) However, since the variables flag and x are independent of each other, the instructions: flag = true; x = 100; for Thread 2 may be reordered If this occurs, the output may be 0!
19.
6.19 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Peterson’s Solution Revisited The effects of instruction reordering in Peterson’s Solution This allows both processes to be in their critical section at the same time! To ensure that Peterson’s solution will work correctly on modern computer architecture we must use Memory Barrier.
20.
6.20 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Memory Barrier Memory model are the memory guarantees a computer architecture makes to application programs. Memory models may be either: • Strongly ordered – where a memory modification of one processor is immediately visible to all other processors. • Weakly ordered – where a memory modification of one processor may not be immediately visible to all other processors. A memory barrier is an instruction that forces any change in memory to be propagated (made visible) to all other processors.
21.
6.21 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Memory Barrier Instructions When a memory barrier instruction is performed, the system ensures that all loads and stores are completed before any subsequent load or store operations are performed. Therefore, even if instructions were reordered, the memory barrier ensures that the store operations are completed in memory and visible to other processors before future load or store operations are performed.
22.
6.22 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Memory Barrier Example Returning to the example of slides 6.17 - 6.18 We could add a memory barrier to the following instructions to ensure Thread 1 outputs 100: Thread 1 now performs while (!flag) memory_barrier(); print x Thread 2 now performs x = 100; memory_barrier(); flag = true For Thread 1 we are guaranteed that that the value of flag is loaded before the value of x. For Thread 2 we ensure that the assignment to x occurs before the assignment flag.
23.
6.23 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Synchronization Hardware Many systems provide hardware support for implementing the critical section code. Uniprocessors – could disable interrupts • Currently running code would execute without preemption • Generally too inefficient on multiprocessor systems Operating systems using this not broadly scalable We will look at three forms of hardware support: 1. Hardware instructions 2. Atomic variables
24.
6.24 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Hardware Instructions Special hardware instructions that allow us to either test-and-modify the content of a word, or two swap the contents of two words atomically (uninterruptedly.) • Test-and-Set instruction • Compare-and-Swap instruction
25.
6.25 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition The test_and_set Instruction Definition boolean test_and_set (boolean *target) { boolean rv = *target; *target = true; return rv: } Properties • Executed atomically • Returns the original value of passed parameter • Set the new value of passed parameter to true
26.
6.26 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Solution Using test_and_set() Shared boolean variable lock, initialized to false Solution: do { while (test_and_set(&lock)) ; /* do nothing */ /* critical section */ lock = false; /* remainder section */ } while (true); Does it solve the critical-section problem?
27.
6.27 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition The compare_and_swap Instruction Definition int compare_and_swap(int *value, int expected, int new_value) { int temp = *value; if (*value == expected) *value = new_value; return temp; } Properties • Executed atomically • Returns the original value of passed parameter value • Set the variable value the value of the passed parameter new_value but only if *value == expected is true. That is, the swap takes place only under this condition.
28.
6.28 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Solution using compare_and_swap Shared integer lock initialized to 0; Solution: while (true){ while (compare_and_swap(&lock, 0, 1) != 0) ; /* do nothing */ /* critical section */ lock = 0; /* remainder section */ } Does it solve the critical-section problem?
29.
6.29 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Bounded-waiting with compare-and-swap while (true) { waiting[i] = true; key = 1; while (waiting[i] && key == 1) key = compare_and_swap(&lock,0,1); waiting[i] = false; /* critical section */ j = (i + 1) % n; while ((j != i) && !waiting[j]) j = (j + 1) % n; if (j == i) lock = 0; else waiting[j] = false; /* remainder section */ }
30.
6.30 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Atomic Variables Typically, instructions such as compare-and-swap are used as building blocks for other synchronization tools. One tool is an atomic variable that provides atomic (uninterruptible) updates on basic data types such as integers and booleans. For example: • Let sequence be an atomic variable • Let increment() be operation on the atomic variable sequence • The Command: increment(&sequence); ensures sequence is incremented without interruption:
31.
6.31 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Atomic Variables The increment() function can be implemented as follows: void increment(atomic_int *v) { int temp; do { temp = *v; } while (temp != (compare_and_swap(v,temp,temp+1)); }
32.
6.32 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Mutex Locks Previous solutions are complicated and generally inaccessible to application programmers OS designers build software tools to solve critical section problem Simplest is mutex lock • Boolean variable indicating if lock is available or not Protect a critical section by • First acquire() a lock • Then release() the lock Calls to acquire() and release() must be atomic • Usually implemented via hardware atomic instructions such as compare-and-swap. But this solution requires busy waiting • This lock therefore called a spinlock
33.
6.33 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Solution to CS Problem Using Mutex Locks while (true) { acquire lock critical section release lock remainder section }
34.
6.34 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Semaphore Synchronization tool that provides more sophisticated ways (than Mutex locks) for processes to synchronize their activities. Semaphore S – integer variable Can only be accessed via two indivisible (atomic) operations • wait() and signal() Originally called P() and V() Definition of the wait() operation wait(S) { while (S <= 0) ; // busy wait S--; } Definition of the signal() operation signal(S) { S++; }
35.
6.35 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Semaphore (Cont.) Counting semaphore – integer value can range over an unrestricted domain Binary semaphore – integer value can range only between 0 and 1 • Same as a mutex lock Can implement a counting semaphore S as a binary semaphore With semaphores we can solve various synchronization problems
36.
6.36 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Semaphore Usage Example Solution to the CS Problem • Create a semaphore “mutex” initialized to 1 wait(mutex); CS signal(mutex); Consider P1 and P2 that with two statements S1 and S2 and the requirement that S1 to happen before S2 • Create a semaphore “synch” initialized to 0 P1: S1; signal(synch); P2: wait(synch); S2;
37.
6.37 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Semaphore Implementation Must guarantee that no two processes can execute the wait() and signal() on the same semaphore at the same time Thus, the implementation becomes the critical section problem where the wait and signal code are placed in the critical section Could now have busy waiting in critical section implementation • But implementation code is short • Little busy waiting if critical section rarely occupied Note that applications may spend lots of time in critical sections and therefore this is not a good solution
38.
6.38 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Semaphore Implementation with no Busy waiting With each semaphore there is an associated waiting queue Each entry in a waiting queue has two data items: • Value (of type integer) • Pointer to next record in the list Two operations: • block – place the process invoking the operation on the appropriate waiting queue • wakeup – remove one of processes in the waiting queue and place it in the ready queue
39.
6.39 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Implementation with no Busy waiting (Cont.) Waiting queue typedef struct { int value; struct process *list; } semaphore;
40.
6.40 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Implementation with no Busy waiting (Cont.) wait(semaphore *S) { S->value--; if (S->value < 0) { add this process to S->list; block(); } } signal(semaphore *S) { S->value++; if (S->value <= 0) { remove a process P from S->list; wakeup(P); } }
41.
6.41 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Problems with Semaphores Incorrect use of semaphore operations: • signal(mutex) …. wait(mutex) • wait(mutex) … wait(mutex) • Omitting of wait (mutex) and/or signal (mutex) These – and others – are examples of what can occur when semaphores and other synchronization tools are used incorrectly.
42.
6.42 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Monitors A high-level abstraction that provides a convenient and effective mechanism for process synchronization Abstract data type, internal variables only accessible by code within the procedure Only one process may be active within the monitor at a time Pseudocode syntax of a monitor: monitor monitor-name { // shared variable declarations procedure P1 (…) { …. } procedure P2 (…) { …. } procedure Pn (…) {……} initialization code (…) { … } }
43.
6.43 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Schematic view of a Monitor
44.
6.44 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Monitor Implementation Using Semaphores Variables semaphore mutex mutex = 1 Each procedure P is replaced by wait(mutex); … body of P; … signal(mutex); Mutual exclusion within a monitor is ensured
45.
6.45 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Condition Variables condition x, y; Two operations are allowed on a condition variable: • x.wait() – a process that invokes the operation is suspended until x.signal() • x.signal() – resumes one of processes (if any) that invoked x.wait() If no x.wait() on the variable, then it has no effect on the variable
46.
6.46 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Monitor with Condition Variables
47.
6.47 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Usage of Condition Variable Example Consider P1 and P2 that that need to execute two statements S1 and S2 and the requirement that S1 to happen before S2 • Create a monitor with two procedures F1 and F2 that are invoked by P1 and P2 respectively • One condition variable “x” initialized to 0 • One Boolean variable “done” • F1: S1; done = true; x.signal(); • F2: if done = false x.wait() S2;
48.
6.48 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Monitor Implementation Using Semaphores Variables semaphore mutex; // (initially = 1) semaphore next; // (initially = 0) int next_count = 0; // number of processes waiting inside the monitor Each function P will be replaced by wait(mutex); … body of P; … if (next_count > 0) signal(next) else signal(mutex); Mutual exclusion within a monitor is ensured
49.
6.49 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Implementation – Condition Variables For each condition variable x, we have: semaphore x_sem; // (initially = 0) int x_count = 0; The operation x.wait() can be implemented as: x_count++; if (next_count > 0) signal(next); else signal(mutex); wait(x_sem); x_count--;
50.
6.50 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Implementation (Cont.) The operation x.signal() can be implemented as: if (x_count > 0) { next_count++; signal(x_sem); wait(next); next_count--; }
51.
6.51 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Resuming Processes within a Monitor If several processes queued on condition variable x, and x.signal() is executed, which process should be resumed? FCFS frequently not adequate Use the conditional-wait construct of the form x.wait(c) where: • c is an integer (called the priority number) • The process with lowest number (highest priority) is scheduled next
52.
6.52 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Allocate a single resource among competing processes using priority numbers that specifies the maximum time a process plans to use the resource R.acquire(t); ... access the resurce; ... R.release; Where R is an instance of type ResourceAllocator Single Resource allocation
53.
6.53 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Allocate a single resource among competing processes using priority numbers that specifies the maximum time a process plans to use the resource The process with the shortest time is allocated the resource first Let R is an instance of type ResourceAllocator (next slide) Access to ResourceAllocator is done via: R.acquire(t); ... access the resurce; ... R.release; Where t is the maximum time a process plans to use the resource Single Resource allocation
54.
6.54 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition A Monitor to Allocate Single Resource monitor ResourceAllocator { boolean busy; condition x; void acquire(int time) { if (busy) x.wait(time); busy = true; } void release() { busy = false; x.signal(); } initialization code() { busy = false; } }
55.
6.55 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Single Resource Monitor (Cont.) Usage: acquire ... release Incorrect use of monitor operations • release() … acquire() • acquire() … acquire()) • Omitting of acquire() and/or release()
56.
6.56 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Liveness Processes may have to wait indefinitely while trying to acquire a synchronization tool such as a mutex lock or semaphore. Waiting indefinitely violates the progress and bounded-waiting criteria discussed at the beginning of this chapter. Liveness refers to a set of properties that a system must satisfy to ensure processes make progress. Indefinite waiting is an example of a liveness failure.
57.
6.57 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Deadlock – two or more processes are waiting indefinitely for an event that can be caused by only one of the waiting processes Let S and Q be two semaphores initialized to 1 P0 P1 wait(S); wait(Q); wait(Q); wait(S); ... ... signal(S); signal(Q); signal(Q); signal(S); Consider if P0 executes wait(S) and P1 wait(Q). When P0 executes wait(Q), it must wait until P1 executes signal(Q) However, P1 is waiting until P0 execute signal(S). Since these signal() operations will never be executed, P0 and P1 are deadlocked. Liveness
58.
6.58 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Other forms of deadlock: Starvation – indefinite blocking • A process may never be removed from the semaphore queue in which it is suspended Priority Inversion – Scheduling problem when lower-priority process holds a lock needed by higher-priority process • Solved via priority-inheritance protocol Liveness
59.
Silberschatz, Galvin and
Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition End of Chapter 6
60.
6.60 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Priority Inheritance Protocol Consider the scenario with three processes P1, P2, and P3. • P1 has the highest priority, P2 the next highest, and P3 the lowest. Assume that P3 is holding semaphore S and that P1 is waiting to S to be released Assume that P2 is assigned the CPU and preempts P3 • P3 is still holding semaphore S • P1 is waiting to S to be released What has happened is that P2 - a process with a lower priority than P1 - has indirectly prevented P3 from gaining access to the resource. To prevent this from occurring, a priority inheritance protocol is used. This simply allows the priority of the highest thread waiting to access a shared resource to be assigned to the thread currently using the resource. Thus, the current owner of the resource is assigned the priority of the highest priority thread wishing to acquire the resource.
61.
6.61 Silberschatz, Galvin
and Gagne ©2018 Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Usage of Condition Variable Example Consider P1 and P2 that that need to execute two statements S1 and S2 and the requirement that S1 to happen before S2 • Create a monitor with two procedures F1 and F2 that are invoked by P1 and P2 respectively • One condition variable “x” initialized to 0 • One Boolean variable “done” • F1: S1; done = true; x.signal(); • F2: if done = false x.wait() S2;
Download now