The document discusses the design of a new wheelchair. It aims to improve upon existing wheelchairs by addressing five main problems: size being too big, weight of around 180kg, abrupt movements, high price of around 220,000 DKK, and unattractive design. The document outlines the aspects of wheelchair design that will be focused on, including the frame, motor, suspension, electrical actuators and chair. It also discusses the teamwork and time management approach, as well as the goals of creating a wheelchair that is smaller and lighter in size, smoother in movement, lower in price, and features a more minimalist and personalized design.

1. 1/32
Manoj Adhikari (163517)
Jorge Cuadra Garcia(163533)
Fatima Ramos Flores(163579)
José Ramos-Martin(163580)
Alberto Rey Varela(163581)

2. •Wheelchair for disable world.
•Wheelchair inside offices.
•Narrow ways.
•No space to maneuvers.
•Driving through doorway.
•Requirement for agile and fast
movements.
2

3. 3

4. 4

5. Our purpose is to change the existing design for
improving the Main Problems we have found in
existing wheelchair.
5

6. We have 5 Main Problems
 Size =>Too big.
 Weight => About 180 kg.
 Abrupt Movement.
 Price => About 220.000 DKK.
 Unattractive Design.
6

7. We decided not to cover this aspects:
 Computer (PLC) Programing.
 Sales and Management.
 Marketing.
 Mass/ Industrial Production.
 External Enviroment.
7

8.  Frame.
 Motor.
 Suspension.
 Electrical actuators.
 Chair
8

9.  Understanding Each other.
 GroupWork.
 Time Schedule Management.
 Resource Management.
9

10.  Different Nationality.
 Different Culture/ Language.
 Different education background.
 Socializing (Dinner/Leisure).
10

11.  Meetings 2 times Every week( 5 hrs+/- 1).
 Consulting with supervisor.
 Division of task (Mechanical and Design).
 Ideas Collection.
 Brainstorming.
11

12.  PlannedTime Schedule (Gantt Chart).
 Division of task.
12

13.  Resources (Human).
 2 persons (Mechanical Calculations and
study).
 3 persons (Design and CAD modelling).
13

14.  Technical Specifications.
 Material Availability.
 Future Prospects.
 Business / Market.
14

15.  Practical Design.
 Perfect size for an average person.
 Light weight/easy to handle.
 Easy control.
15

16.  Easily available materials.
 Cheaper materials.
 Durable and test approved.
16

17.  Remote controlled.
 Outdoor Use.
 Mass Production.
17

18.  Ready for production. (programming left)
 Good price for the perfomance.
 Technology ready to transfer to companies.
18

19. 19

20. Weight.Weight.
Size.Size.
Movement.Movement.
Price.Price.
Design.Design.
20

21. Weight: 180 kg vs 55 kg.Weight: 180 kg vs 55 kg.
Size.Size.
Movement.Movement.
Price.Price.
Design.Design.
21

22. Weight.Weight.
Size: 150 cm x 110 cm vs 90 cm x 75 cm.Size: 150 cm x 110 cm vs 90 cm x 75 cm.
Movement.Movement.
Price.Price.
Design.Design.
22

23. Weight.Weight.
Size.Size.
Movement: shock absorbers and cover wheel.Movement: shock absorbers and cover wheel.
Price.Price.
Design.Design.
23

24. Weight.Weight.
Size.Size.
Movement.Movement.
Price: Dkk 220.000.- vs Dkk 65.000.-Price: Dkk 220.000.- vs Dkk 65.000.-
Design.Design.
24

25. Weight.Weight.
Size.Size.
Movement.Movement.
Price.Price.
Design: Minimalism, Personalized.Design: Minimalism, Personalized.
25

26. Mechanically Complex.Mechanically Complex.
Price with competitors.Price with competitors.
26

27. Mechanically Complex.Mechanically Complex.
Price with competitors.Price with competitors.
27

28. Mechanically Complex.Mechanically Complex.
Price with competitors.Price with competitors.
28

29. 29

30.  Challenges achieved.
▪ Weight.
▪ Price.
▪ Appearance.
▪ Ergonomic & Comfort.
 Personal experience satisfactory.
 Working group.
30

31.  Supervisors:
▪ Per Ulrik Hansen.
▪ Martin Mohl.
 Via University College.
31

32. 32