The DAC is a forum within the OECD where major bilateral donors work together to support sustainable development in developing countries. While it does not specifically address minority issues, the DAC frequently consults civil society groups, including minority populations, when establishing policy guidelines. The DAC aims to foster coordinated and effective international development efforts through adopting policy guidelines, conducting reviews of members' programs, and providing forums for dialogue.
This document discusses 12 lessons for effective aid management based on reviews by the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The lessons are categorized into strategy, organizational management, and delivery management. For strategy, it emphasizes having a clear high-level statement of purpose for development cooperation, managing competing national interests so they don't undermine long-term development goals, achieving policy coherence for development, and investing in measuring and communicating results. For organizational management, it discusses identifying an effective leadership structure, dealing with institutional dispersion, managing multilateral contributions, and decentralizing management. For delivery management, it covers scaling up aid effectively, maintaining a focused country and sector approach, emphasizing performance management and
Global governance and global rules for development in the post-2015 eraDaniel Dufourt
This document discusses the need to reform global governance and global rules to better support development in the post-2015 era. It argues that the current system is not well-equipped to manage growing interdependence among countries or address inequalities. It proposes five principles to guide reform: common but differentiated responsibilities, subsidiarity, inclusiveness and transparency, coherence, and responsible sovereignty. The document examines key areas - like the environment, trade, and inequality - that need strengthened global cooperation. It recommends the UN, particularly ECOSOC, play a stronger role in coordinating reform to close the gap between commitments and implementation. Overall, the document calls for multilateral cooperation to create conditions supporting a sustainable and inclusive post-2015 development agenda
This document presents the DAC Global Relations Strategy, which aims to strengthen engagement with non-member countries, organizations, and other stakeholders involved in international development cooperation. The strategy's objectives are to enrich policy dialogue, make DAC decision-making more inclusive, and strengthen the overall development cooperation architecture. Priority partners include major bilateral donors, international organizations, developing countries, the private sector, foundations, and civil society groups. The strategy encourages new DAC members and outlines participation of non-members as observers or full participants. It focuses engagement on partners providing over $100 million in development finance annually or 0.20% of GNI as ODA.
The document discusses principles for a post-2015 United Nations development agenda. It summarizes that while the Millennium Development Goals effectively raised awareness of poverty, the goals were narrow in scope and did not address country specificities. It proposes that the new framework incorporate the principles of the Millennium Declaration, expand freedoms in a sustainable and equitable way, and involve inclusive participation. It also recommends that countries define national sustainable development strategies integrating economic, social, and environmental dimensions to promote decent employment and social/environmental sustainability. A rethinking of global partnerships is needed to provide public goods in a coherent way.
Un system task team on the post2015 un development agendaDr Lendy Spires
This document discusses objectives and goals for a global partnership on financing sustainable development beyond 2015. It identifies two main objectives: 1) Ensure policy coherence and coordination between different policy processes and institutions. 2) Improve the mobilization and allocation of resources for sustainable development across all relevant areas. It proposes concrete partnership goals in areas like mobilizing domestic public/private resources, external private resources, and external public resources to achieve these objectives. The document emphasizes the need for the partnership to address issues of international financial architecture and align economic policies with sustainability goals.
This document summarizes a learning event held by DFID to facilitate sharing of experiences in international development between DFID, IDS, and representatives from the BRICS countries. Presentations highlighted that DFID seeks to understand how to engage new development actors like the BRICS in the changing global landscape after Busan. Participants discussed the need for BRICS countries to address inequality and systematize learning from their development experiences. The event aimed to identify priority areas and frameworks for future cooperation between DFID and the BRICS to help deliver DFID's objectives.
The document discusses national strategies for sustainable development (NSSDs). It summarizes that in 1999, the OECD launched a project with 8 developing countries and donors to provide guidance on effective NSSDs. The project revealed how NSSDs can improve integrating social, environmental, and economic objectives into development processes through coordinated mechanisms and ongoing processes rather than comprehensive plans. The challenges are implementing these processes and ensuring private sector participation in NSSDs to fuel sustainable development through responsible business practices.
Metrics of International Cooperation: from Official Development Assistance to...UNDP Policy Centre
The document discusses official development assistance (ODA) and efforts to expand metrics of international cooperation beyond ODA to total official support for sustainable development (TOSSD). It defines ODA, outlines its governance by the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC), and describes how DAC members report ODA data which is made publicly available. The document notes limitations of focusing only on ODA and introduces TOSSD as a new statistical measure under development that would capture a broader range of officially supported resource flows to promote sustainable development.
This document discusses 12 lessons for effective aid management based on reviews by the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The lessons are categorized into strategy, organizational management, and delivery management. For strategy, it emphasizes having a clear high-level statement of purpose for development cooperation, managing competing national interests so they don't undermine long-term development goals, achieving policy coherence for development, and investing in measuring and communicating results. For organizational management, it discusses identifying an effective leadership structure, dealing with institutional dispersion, managing multilateral contributions, and decentralizing management. For delivery management, it covers scaling up aid effectively, maintaining a focused country and sector approach, emphasizing performance management and
Global governance and global rules for development in the post-2015 eraDaniel Dufourt
This document discusses the need to reform global governance and global rules to better support development in the post-2015 era. It argues that the current system is not well-equipped to manage growing interdependence among countries or address inequalities. It proposes five principles to guide reform: common but differentiated responsibilities, subsidiarity, inclusiveness and transparency, coherence, and responsible sovereignty. The document examines key areas - like the environment, trade, and inequality - that need strengthened global cooperation. It recommends the UN, particularly ECOSOC, play a stronger role in coordinating reform to close the gap between commitments and implementation. Overall, the document calls for multilateral cooperation to create conditions supporting a sustainable and inclusive post-2015 development agenda
This document presents the DAC Global Relations Strategy, which aims to strengthen engagement with non-member countries, organizations, and other stakeholders involved in international development cooperation. The strategy's objectives are to enrich policy dialogue, make DAC decision-making more inclusive, and strengthen the overall development cooperation architecture. Priority partners include major bilateral donors, international organizations, developing countries, the private sector, foundations, and civil society groups. The strategy encourages new DAC members and outlines participation of non-members as observers or full participants. It focuses engagement on partners providing over $100 million in development finance annually or 0.20% of GNI as ODA.
The document discusses principles for a post-2015 United Nations development agenda. It summarizes that while the Millennium Development Goals effectively raised awareness of poverty, the goals were narrow in scope and did not address country specificities. It proposes that the new framework incorporate the principles of the Millennium Declaration, expand freedoms in a sustainable and equitable way, and involve inclusive participation. It also recommends that countries define national sustainable development strategies integrating economic, social, and environmental dimensions to promote decent employment and social/environmental sustainability. A rethinking of global partnerships is needed to provide public goods in a coherent way.
Un system task team on the post2015 un development agendaDr Lendy Spires
This document discusses objectives and goals for a global partnership on financing sustainable development beyond 2015. It identifies two main objectives: 1) Ensure policy coherence and coordination between different policy processes and institutions. 2) Improve the mobilization and allocation of resources for sustainable development across all relevant areas. It proposes concrete partnership goals in areas like mobilizing domestic public/private resources, external private resources, and external public resources to achieve these objectives. The document emphasizes the need for the partnership to address issues of international financial architecture and align economic policies with sustainability goals.
This document summarizes a learning event held by DFID to facilitate sharing of experiences in international development between DFID, IDS, and representatives from the BRICS countries. Presentations highlighted that DFID seeks to understand how to engage new development actors like the BRICS in the changing global landscape after Busan. Participants discussed the need for BRICS countries to address inequality and systematize learning from their development experiences. The event aimed to identify priority areas and frameworks for future cooperation between DFID and the BRICS to help deliver DFID's objectives.
The document discusses national strategies for sustainable development (NSSDs). It summarizes that in 1999, the OECD launched a project with 8 developing countries and donors to provide guidance on effective NSSDs. The project revealed how NSSDs can improve integrating social, environmental, and economic objectives into development processes through coordinated mechanisms and ongoing processes rather than comprehensive plans. The challenges are implementing these processes and ensuring private sector participation in NSSDs to fuel sustainable development through responsible business practices.
Metrics of International Cooperation: from Official Development Assistance to...UNDP Policy Centre
The document discusses official development assistance (ODA) and efforts to expand metrics of international cooperation beyond ODA to total official support for sustainable development (TOSSD). It defines ODA, outlines its governance by the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC), and describes how DAC members report ODA data which is made publicly available. The document notes limitations of focusing only on ODA and introduces TOSSD as a new statistical measure under development that would capture a broader range of officially supported resource flows to promote sustainable development.
Multi-stakeholder partnerships play an increasingly important role in implementing sustainable development. Such partnerships involve collaboration between state and non-state actors like organizations, businesses, and civil society. The Rio+20 Conference highlighted their importance and led to over 700 voluntary commitments being registered. The UN established an online registry to track these commitments and promote transparency. The High-Level Political Forum is discussing how to best support partnerships and ensure their accountability in working towards sustainable development goals.
1st high level meeting of the global partnership for effective development co...Dr Lendy Spires
The document summarizes preparations for the first High-Level Meeting of the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation in Mexico City on April 15-16, 2014. It outlines the objectives and agenda of the meeting, which will focus on progress implementing commitments from the 2011 Busan summit, as well as domestic resource mobilization, development cooperation with middle-income countries, and the private sector's role. It also discusses the monitoring process assessing implementation of Busan commitments, and notes growing momentum and interest in the meeting, though some challenges engaging key countries. Finally, it outlines United Nations engagement in the partnership and preparations for the high-level meeting.
For decades, global development discussions predominantly revolved around the volume of aid given and received. But the 2002 Monterrey International Conference on Financing for Development broadened the focus of discussions to include the quality of the cooperation provided as a key determinant of progress. Both donors and recipients realized they needed to improve how aid was delivered to make it useful for beneficiaries. Oxfam has been actively involved in this debate, pushing for higher quality standards and aid that works for the people who need it most.1 In the years that followed, three High Level Fora on Aid Effectiveness were convened by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD): in Rome (2003), in Paris (2005) and Accra (2008). Each forum marked a step forward. In Rome, donor and recipient countries were asked, for the first time, to focus their discussions exclusively on aid quality, with the result that they agreed to harmonize donor practices for improved performance.2 However, this approach left the essential contribution of recipient countries to aid effectiveness out of the equation and raised concerns that even harmonized approaches might undermine country ownership. The Paris forum acknowledged the need to include recipient governments in an ongoing dialogue on how to improve aid and shift the focus of the debate from effective donorship to effective partnership. Developing countries were invited to join the negotiating table on par with their cooperation providers.3 The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness4 committed signatories to respect and implement five basic principles: harmonization of donor policies and practices; alignment to national development strategies; mutual accountability; a focus on measuring and delivering results for people; and ownership of development cooperation. But, beyond making a list of good intentions, Paris also produced a clear scorecard to hold development partners accountable for what they were promising: a set of 12 indicators to measure progress in a number of crucial areas, such as the predictability of aid flows to developing country governments; the use of developing countries‟ financial and administrative systems; and the transfer of technical capacity to local staff. Each indicator included targets and a deadline to achieve them by 2010. Partners also agreed to monitor their own progress towards the governance commitments they made.
DAC member countries can improve partnerships with civil society organizations by developing comprehensive civil society policies. These policies should be evidence-based, clarify objectives for supporting civil society, and be designed in consultation with CSOs. Specifically, the policies should be included in overarching development strategies, continuously assess assumptions about CSO roles, and establish measurable commitments like those in the Busan agreement. Regular reviews involving CSOs can help ensure the policies adapt to changing needs. Strong civil society policies provide a strategic framework to guide effective and mutually beneficial cooperation.
Emering donors and knowledge sharing for development the case of koreaDr Lendy Spires
South Korea has emerged as an "emerging donor" country that shares its development experiences and policies with other developing nations through programs like its Knowledge Sharing Program (KSP). However, KSP has limitations like South Korea's monopoly over interpreting its own development history and a narrow focus on economic factors. For KSP to be more effective, South Korea needs to present a more open and heterodox view of its development and consider social and political factors, not just economic ones.
The OECD report finds that income inequality has been rising in most OECD countries over the past two decades. Regulatory reforms to product and labor markets that were intended to boost employment and growth have also contributed to widening wage disparities. While economic growth has occurred, the benefits have disproportionately favored the rich over the poor and middle-class in many countries. If left unaddressed, growing inequality could undermine social cohesion.
The global partnership for effective development cooperationDr Lendy Spires
This document discusses the establishment of a new Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation. Key points:
- The partnership aims to establish a new governance structure for development cooperation that includes both traditional and emerging donors as well as other stakeholders.
- It proposes a two-tier governance structure with a steering committee of 18 members representing different constituencies.
- Integrating emerging economy donors and differentiating their approaches from traditional donors presents a challenge given their diversity.
- Areas like agriculture may provide opportunities for substantive engagement between different donor types on issues of joint interest.
The Co-operative Development Initiative (CDI) was a federal government program from 2003-2013 that aimed to enhance co-operatives in Canada. While perceived as initially successful, it ultimately failed due to several policy barriers, including that it was delivered through Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada instead of other relevant departments, a lack of legal and advisory supports across provinces, and an unsupportive policy environment in most provinces for co-operative development. The program also had problems with centralized funding allocation that benefited some provinces over others. Future co-operative development policies in Canada need to address these issues through greater inter-governmental collaboration and involvement of co-operatives in policy-making.
This document discusses desirable features of renewing the global partnership for development to support a post-2015 development agenda. It analyzes lessons from the MDG framework for Goal 8 on the global partnership and other multi-stakeholder partnerships. Key recommendations include broadening partnership actors to include new partners like the private sector; strengthening accountability and monitoring; ensuring policy coherence across trade, finance and development; and mobilizing resources from various sources to finance sustainable development goals.
ICESDF_outreach_Helsinki_Co-creating partnersips for SD financing_outcomeSari Sironen
This document provides a summary of a multi-stakeholder outreach event held in Helsinki, Finland from April 3-4, 2014 to discuss partnerships for financing sustainable development. The event was organized by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland and Aalto University in cooperation with the UN Intergovernmental Committee of Experts on Sustainable Development Financing (ICESDF). Over 100 participants from public, private and civil society sectors across four continents attended.
The document summarizes the key discussions and messages around enabling greater private sector involvement in sustainable development financing. It was noted that while commitments from businesses are encouraging, more action is needed to align private investments with sustainable development objectives. New partnerships were proposed to better channel private flows towards priority
The Partnership for Action on Green Economy (PAGE) is a collaboration between UNEP, ILO, UNIDO, and UNITAR that aims to support 30 countries' transitions to inclusive green economies by 2020. PAGE provides tools and technical assistance to help countries formulate green economy policies, strengthen capacity to implement initiatives, and share knowledge on green economic development. The partnership takes a multi-stakeholder approach to promote environmental sustainability, decent job creation, poverty reduction, and improved well-being.
http://sdg.earthsystemgovernance.org/sdg/publications/coherent-governance-un-and-sdgs
Key messages of Policy Brief #4:
1. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) require appropriate institutional support to integrate them effectively into institutions and practices, to coordinate activities, and to mobilize resources for implementation. The High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development (HLPF) can be a lead “orchestrator of orchestrators” towards these ends, but will require high-level participation, innovative modalities for North-South dialogue, and links with “intermediaries” within and outside of the UN.
2. Monitoring and review processes are crucial to ensure accountability, facilitate learning among countries and stakeholders, and incentivize implementation processes. Reviews should be systemic, science-based and multi-dimensional, and focus on commitments and actions of countries, international institutions, and non-state actors and networks. The quadrennial United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) meetings of the HLPF could consider revisions or modifications of the SDGs over time as new knowledge becomes available.
3. State-led mutual review of national sustainable development progress mandated under the HLPF could be organized around common challenges – for example countries coping with megacities or running out of water. Such reviews would provide systemic evaluations rather than focus only on specific goals. International institutions should be reviewed on their progress in mainstreaming SDGs and targets into their work programs or adequately focusing on areas unaddressed by other stakeholders. These reviews should be considered nodes in a wider system of review and accountability.
4. The new Global Sustainable Development Report (a collection of assessments and reviews by UN and other actors), part of the HLPF’s mandate to improve the science-policy interface, should not simply collect other reviews, but also bring together knowledge required to fill implementation gaps and identify cause-effect relationships and transition pathways, possibly overseen by a meta-science panel.
5. Governance of the SDGs should be designed to mobilize action and resources at multiple levels and through diverse mixes of government and non-state actors, partnerships, and action networks. This diversity in means of implementation must be balanced by state-led mechanisms to ensure accountability, responsibility, coherence and capacity to incentivize long-term investments for sustainable development.
The document provides an overview of South-South cooperation (SSC), including its history, key concepts, principles, and UNFPA's role and strategies related to SSC. Some key points:
- SSC originated in the 1950s-60s as developing countries promoted economic cooperation and collective self-reliance. The UN has supported SSC through mechanisms like the High-Level Committee on SSC.
- SSC involves developing countries working together through knowledge sharing, skills/resources to pursue development goals. It is based on solidarity and non-conditionality.
- Triangular cooperation involves developed countries/orgs providing support to developing country partnerships upon request.
- UNFPA supports SSC
Workshop on Capacity Building on Environment, Trade and Development
16 July 2002, Washington, DC
Rayburn House Office Building.
U.S. House of Representatives in the Capitol Hill
The document discusses the importance of effective governance in Africa and the role of leadership in driving development outcomes on the continent. It highlights remarks from Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf about Africa being rich in potential but poorly managed. It also discusses the Tony Blair Africa Governance Initiative (AGI), which aims to improve governance in African countries by focusing on effective delivery of public services and building core government functions. The AGI works inside partner governments and combines technical teams with a model emphasizing implementation systems, priority-setting, planning and performance management.
This document discusses factors that may lead to overestimating demand for microloans. It notes that not all poor individuals want or can qualify for microloans. Many simply do not want or need loans due to preferring alternative financing or not having a viable investment. Additionally, some potential borrowers are deemed uncreditworthy due to insufficient or unreliable income to repay loans. Even among those who want and qualify for loans, demand estimates assume constant borrowing when in reality borrowers are only active part of the time. The evidence suggests current demand may be overestimated by a considerable margin.
Peer review of the evaluation function of the office of internal oversight se...Dr Lendy Spires
This document summarizes a peer review of the evaluation function of the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) of the United Nations Secretariat. A panel of international evaluation experts assessed OIOS' evaluation division (IED) based on the criteria of independence, credibility, and utility. The panel found that IED has taken steps to strengthen its evaluations but faces challenges in its thematic expertise, resources, and emphasis on effectiveness. While IED operates independently, its location impacts how it is perceived. The utility of IED's evaluations is limited by dissemination practices and a focus on oversight rather than learning. The panel provided recommendations to enhance IED's credibility and the use of its evaluation results.
This document is a community guide created by the Centre on Housing Rights & Evictions (COHRE) to educate communities in Nigeria about their housing rights and how to defend against forced evictions. It aims to address the lack of information and awareness around housing rights that communities in Nigeria face. The guide covers international human rights law and the Nigerian constitution's protections for housing rights. It is intended to empower communities to understand their rights, participate in decisions that affect them, and take collective action to defend against losing their homes and land to development projects. The guide provides strategies communities can use to advocate for their rights and will be used by COHRE to train grassroots activists.
The Impact of the Financial Crisis on Microfinance Institutions and Their Cli...Dr Lendy Spires
The document summarizes the results of a survey conducted by CGAP in 2009 on the impact of the financial crisis on microfinance institutions and their clients. Over 400 MFI managers responded from institutions around the world. The survey found that MFI clients, especially in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, were having difficulties repaying loans as they prioritized spending on food. MFIs were also experiencing issues like stagnating loan portfolios, deteriorating portfolio quality, and liquidity constraints. While most MFIs had not raised interest rates for clients, some had slowed hiring to cut costs. The outlook anticipated further problems for clients and MFIs as the effects of the crisis continued.
Assessing the Relative Poverty Level of MFI Clients Case StudiesDr Lendy Spires
- The document summarizes 4 case studies assessing the poverty levels of clients of microfinance institutions (MFIs) in different regions. It describes each MFI's operations, methodology, target clients, and products. Surveys of 200-300 client and non-client households were conducted for each MFI to develop a poverty index.
- The 4 MFIs studied were in Central America (MFI A), East Africa (MFI B), Southern Africa (MFI C), and South Asia (MFI D). They used different methodologies like individual loans, group guarantees, and compulsory savings. Client targets ranged from all segments to specifically women or the poor.
- Survey costs ranged from $
Financing Small Snterprises what Role for MicrofinanceDr Lendy Spires
The document discusses the role of microfinance institutions (MFIs) in serving small enterprises. It finds that while many MFIs are increasingly targeting small businesses, they face several challenges in doing so effectively. Key challenges include a lack of appropriate risk assessment methods tailored for small businesses, an inadequate range of financial products, and insufficient specialized staff or departments. The document suggests that in order to better serve small businesses' diverse needs, MFIs will need to strengthen their risk management, portfolio monitoring, and product offerings.
Multi-stakeholder partnerships play an increasingly important role in implementing sustainable development. Such partnerships involve collaboration between state and non-state actors like organizations, businesses, and civil society. The Rio+20 Conference highlighted their importance and led to over 700 voluntary commitments being registered. The UN established an online registry to track these commitments and promote transparency. The High-Level Political Forum is discussing how to best support partnerships and ensure their accountability in working towards sustainable development goals.
1st high level meeting of the global partnership for effective development co...Dr Lendy Spires
The document summarizes preparations for the first High-Level Meeting of the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation in Mexico City on April 15-16, 2014. It outlines the objectives and agenda of the meeting, which will focus on progress implementing commitments from the 2011 Busan summit, as well as domestic resource mobilization, development cooperation with middle-income countries, and the private sector's role. It also discusses the monitoring process assessing implementation of Busan commitments, and notes growing momentum and interest in the meeting, though some challenges engaging key countries. Finally, it outlines United Nations engagement in the partnership and preparations for the high-level meeting.
For decades, global development discussions predominantly revolved around the volume of aid given and received. But the 2002 Monterrey International Conference on Financing for Development broadened the focus of discussions to include the quality of the cooperation provided as a key determinant of progress. Both donors and recipients realized they needed to improve how aid was delivered to make it useful for beneficiaries. Oxfam has been actively involved in this debate, pushing for higher quality standards and aid that works for the people who need it most.1 In the years that followed, three High Level Fora on Aid Effectiveness were convened by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD): in Rome (2003), in Paris (2005) and Accra (2008). Each forum marked a step forward. In Rome, donor and recipient countries were asked, for the first time, to focus their discussions exclusively on aid quality, with the result that they agreed to harmonize donor practices for improved performance.2 However, this approach left the essential contribution of recipient countries to aid effectiveness out of the equation and raised concerns that even harmonized approaches might undermine country ownership. The Paris forum acknowledged the need to include recipient governments in an ongoing dialogue on how to improve aid and shift the focus of the debate from effective donorship to effective partnership. Developing countries were invited to join the negotiating table on par with their cooperation providers.3 The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness4 committed signatories to respect and implement five basic principles: harmonization of donor policies and practices; alignment to national development strategies; mutual accountability; a focus on measuring and delivering results for people; and ownership of development cooperation. But, beyond making a list of good intentions, Paris also produced a clear scorecard to hold development partners accountable for what they were promising: a set of 12 indicators to measure progress in a number of crucial areas, such as the predictability of aid flows to developing country governments; the use of developing countries‟ financial and administrative systems; and the transfer of technical capacity to local staff. Each indicator included targets and a deadline to achieve them by 2010. Partners also agreed to monitor their own progress towards the governance commitments they made.
DAC member countries can improve partnerships with civil society organizations by developing comprehensive civil society policies. These policies should be evidence-based, clarify objectives for supporting civil society, and be designed in consultation with CSOs. Specifically, the policies should be included in overarching development strategies, continuously assess assumptions about CSO roles, and establish measurable commitments like those in the Busan agreement. Regular reviews involving CSOs can help ensure the policies adapt to changing needs. Strong civil society policies provide a strategic framework to guide effective and mutually beneficial cooperation.
Emering donors and knowledge sharing for development the case of koreaDr Lendy Spires
South Korea has emerged as an "emerging donor" country that shares its development experiences and policies with other developing nations through programs like its Knowledge Sharing Program (KSP). However, KSP has limitations like South Korea's monopoly over interpreting its own development history and a narrow focus on economic factors. For KSP to be more effective, South Korea needs to present a more open and heterodox view of its development and consider social and political factors, not just economic ones.
The OECD report finds that income inequality has been rising in most OECD countries over the past two decades. Regulatory reforms to product and labor markets that were intended to boost employment and growth have also contributed to widening wage disparities. While economic growth has occurred, the benefits have disproportionately favored the rich over the poor and middle-class in many countries. If left unaddressed, growing inequality could undermine social cohesion.
The global partnership for effective development cooperationDr Lendy Spires
This document discusses the establishment of a new Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation. Key points:
- The partnership aims to establish a new governance structure for development cooperation that includes both traditional and emerging donors as well as other stakeholders.
- It proposes a two-tier governance structure with a steering committee of 18 members representing different constituencies.
- Integrating emerging economy donors and differentiating their approaches from traditional donors presents a challenge given their diversity.
- Areas like agriculture may provide opportunities for substantive engagement between different donor types on issues of joint interest.
The Co-operative Development Initiative (CDI) was a federal government program from 2003-2013 that aimed to enhance co-operatives in Canada. While perceived as initially successful, it ultimately failed due to several policy barriers, including that it was delivered through Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada instead of other relevant departments, a lack of legal and advisory supports across provinces, and an unsupportive policy environment in most provinces for co-operative development. The program also had problems with centralized funding allocation that benefited some provinces over others. Future co-operative development policies in Canada need to address these issues through greater inter-governmental collaboration and involvement of co-operatives in policy-making.
This document discusses desirable features of renewing the global partnership for development to support a post-2015 development agenda. It analyzes lessons from the MDG framework for Goal 8 on the global partnership and other multi-stakeholder partnerships. Key recommendations include broadening partnership actors to include new partners like the private sector; strengthening accountability and monitoring; ensuring policy coherence across trade, finance and development; and mobilizing resources from various sources to finance sustainable development goals.
ICESDF_outreach_Helsinki_Co-creating partnersips for SD financing_outcomeSari Sironen
This document provides a summary of a multi-stakeholder outreach event held in Helsinki, Finland from April 3-4, 2014 to discuss partnerships for financing sustainable development. The event was organized by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland and Aalto University in cooperation with the UN Intergovernmental Committee of Experts on Sustainable Development Financing (ICESDF). Over 100 participants from public, private and civil society sectors across four continents attended.
The document summarizes the key discussions and messages around enabling greater private sector involvement in sustainable development financing. It was noted that while commitments from businesses are encouraging, more action is needed to align private investments with sustainable development objectives. New partnerships were proposed to better channel private flows towards priority
The Partnership for Action on Green Economy (PAGE) is a collaboration between UNEP, ILO, UNIDO, and UNITAR that aims to support 30 countries' transitions to inclusive green economies by 2020. PAGE provides tools and technical assistance to help countries formulate green economy policies, strengthen capacity to implement initiatives, and share knowledge on green economic development. The partnership takes a multi-stakeholder approach to promote environmental sustainability, decent job creation, poverty reduction, and improved well-being.
http://sdg.earthsystemgovernance.org/sdg/publications/coherent-governance-un-and-sdgs
Key messages of Policy Brief #4:
1. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) require appropriate institutional support to integrate them effectively into institutions and practices, to coordinate activities, and to mobilize resources for implementation. The High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development (HLPF) can be a lead “orchestrator of orchestrators” towards these ends, but will require high-level participation, innovative modalities for North-South dialogue, and links with “intermediaries” within and outside of the UN.
2. Monitoring and review processes are crucial to ensure accountability, facilitate learning among countries and stakeholders, and incentivize implementation processes. Reviews should be systemic, science-based and multi-dimensional, and focus on commitments and actions of countries, international institutions, and non-state actors and networks. The quadrennial United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) meetings of the HLPF could consider revisions or modifications of the SDGs over time as new knowledge becomes available.
3. State-led mutual review of national sustainable development progress mandated under the HLPF could be organized around common challenges – for example countries coping with megacities or running out of water. Such reviews would provide systemic evaluations rather than focus only on specific goals. International institutions should be reviewed on their progress in mainstreaming SDGs and targets into their work programs or adequately focusing on areas unaddressed by other stakeholders. These reviews should be considered nodes in a wider system of review and accountability.
4. The new Global Sustainable Development Report (a collection of assessments and reviews by UN and other actors), part of the HLPF’s mandate to improve the science-policy interface, should not simply collect other reviews, but also bring together knowledge required to fill implementation gaps and identify cause-effect relationships and transition pathways, possibly overseen by a meta-science panel.
5. Governance of the SDGs should be designed to mobilize action and resources at multiple levels and through diverse mixes of government and non-state actors, partnerships, and action networks. This diversity in means of implementation must be balanced by state-led mechanisms to ensure accountability, responsibility, coherence and capacity to incentivize long-term investments for sustainable development.
The document provides an overview of South-South cooperation (SSC), including its history, key concepts, principles, and UNFPA's role and strategies related to SSC. Some key points:
- SSC originated in the 1950s-60s as developing countries promoted economic cooperation and collective self-reliance. The UN has supported SSC through mechanisms like the High-Level Committee on SSC.
- SSC involves developing countries working together through knowledge sharing, skills/resources to pursue development goals. It is based on solidarity and non-conditionality.
- Triangular cooperation involves developed countries/orgs providing support to developing country partnerships upon request.
- UNFPA supports SSC
Workshop on Capacity Building on Environment, Trade and Development
16 July 2002, Washington, DC
Rayburn House Office Building.
U.S. House of Representatives in the Capitol Hill
The document discusses the importance of effective governance in Africa and the role of leadership in driving development outcomes on the continent. It highlights remarks from Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf about Africa being rich in potential but poorly managed. It also discusses the Tony Blair Africa Governance Initiative (AGI), which aims to improve governance in African countries by focusing on effective delivery of public services and building core government functions. The AGI works inside partner governments and combines technical teams with a model emphasizing implementation systems, priority-setting, planning and performance management.
This document discusses factors that may lead to overestimating demand for microloans. It notes that not all poor individuals want or can qualify for microloans. Many simply do not want or need loans due to preferring alternative financing or not having a viable investment. Additionally, some potential borrowers are deemed uncreditworthy due to insufficient or unreliable income to repay loans. Even among those who want and qualify for loans, demand estimates assume constant borrowing when in reality borrowers are only active part of the time. The evidence suggests current demand may be overestimated by a considerable margin.
Peer review of the evaluation function of the office of internal oversight se...Dr Lendy Spires
This document summarizes a peer review of the evaluation function of the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) of the United Nations Secretariat. A panel of international evaluation experts assessed OIOS' evaluation division (IED) based on the criteria of independence, credibility, and utility. The panel found that IED has taken steps to strengthen its evaluations but faces challenges in its thematic expertise, resources, and emphasis on effectiveness. While IED operates independently, its location impacts how it is perceived. The utility of IED's evaluations is limited by dissemination practices and a focus on oversight rather than learning. The panel provided recommendations to enhance IED's credibility and the use of its evaluation results.
This document is a community guide created by the Centre on Housing Rights & Evictions (COHRE) to educate communities in Nigeria about their housing rights and how to defend against forced evictions. It aims to address the lack of information and awareness around housing rights that communities in Nigeria face. The guide covers international human rights law and the Nigerian constitution's protections for housing rights. It is intended to empower communities to understand their rights, participate in decisions that affect them, and take collective action to defend against losing their homes and land to development projects. The guide provides strategies communities can use to advocate for their rights and will be used by COHRE to train grassroots activists.
The Impact of the Financial Crisis on Microfinance Institutions and Their Cli...Dr Lendy Spires
The document summarizes the results of a survey conducted by CGAP in 2009 on the impact of the financial crisis on microfinance institutions and their clients. Over 400 MFI managers responded from institutions around the world. The survey found that MFI clients, especially in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, were having difficulties repaying loans as they prioritized spending on food. MFIs were also experiencing issues like stagnating loan portfolios, deteriorating portfolio quality, and liquidity constraints. While most MFIs had not raised interest rates for clients, some had slowed hiring to cut costs. The outlook anticipated further problems for clients and MFIs as the effects of the crisis continued.
Assessing the Relative Poverty Level of MFI Clients Case StudiesDr Lendy Spires
- The document summarizes 4 case studies assessing the poverty levels of clients of microfinance institutions (MFIs) in different regions. It describes each MFI's operations, methodology, target clients, and products. Surveys of 200-300 client and non-client households were conducted for each MFI to develop a poverty index.
- The 4 MFIs studied were in Central America (MFI A), East Africa (MFI B), Southern Africa (MFI C), and South Asia (MFI D). They used different methodologies like individual loans, group guarantees, and compulsory savings. Client targets ranged from all segments to specifically women or the poor.
- Survey costs ranged from $
Financing Small Snterprises what Role for MicrofinanceDr Lendy Spires
The document discusses the role of microfinance institutions (MFIs) in serving small enterprises. It finds that while many MFIs are increasingly targeting small businesses, they face several challenges in doing so effectively. Key challenges include a lack of appropriate risk assessment methods tailored for small businesses, an inadequate range of financial products, and insufficient specialized staff or departments. The document suggests that in order to better serve small businesses' diverse needs, MFIs will need to strengthen their risk management, portfolio monitoring, and product offerings.
The Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment Bill aims to promote greater racial equality and participation in the South African economy. It establishes an advisory council to support black economic empowerment. The bill's objectives are to transform the economy to enable meaningful black participation, increase black ownership and management of enterprises, promote investment programs, and empower rural communities. It allows the minister to issue codes of practice and publish sector charters to advance these objectives. The Department of Trade and Industry will provide funding and support services to the advisory council.
Safety and security on the internet challenges and advances in member statesDr Lendy Spires
This document analyzes survey results from 114 countries on key issues related to safety and security on the internet as it relates to health. It finds that while many countries have addressed regulation of internet pharmacies and security issues like spam, there is still work to be done. Specifically, it notes that most countries have not decided whether to allow or prohibit internet pharmacies. It also discusses challenges around ensuring children's safety online and ensuring the quality of online health information. The report provides analysis and implications of the survey results and concludes there is a need for continued progress across eHealth issues.
This document provides a summary of UNESCO's efforts toward gender equality and equity since the Fourth World Conference on Women in 1995. It discusses the evolution from focusing solely on "women in development" to a "gender and development" approach that mainstreaming a gender perspective into all policies and programs. The key principles of gender mainstreaming outlined are empowerment, accountability, and integration of effort. UNESCO's commitments and achievements are reviewed in three parts: reaffirming its commitment to gender equality, summarizing accomplishments across five priority areas from 1995-2000, and outlining elements for a new strategy from 2001-2006 with a multidisciplinary approach and further integration of gender mainstreaming.
How have Market Challenges Affected Microfinance Investment Funds Dr Lendy Spires
The total assets of the 10 largest microfinance investment funds grew in 2011, reaching $4 billion, driven by increased demand from microfinance institutions for capital. While support from investors remained strong with the launch of new funds, fund returns were lower on average due to lower market interest rates and higher loan loss provisions. Microfinance investment funds are increasingly targeting underserved markets in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and rural areas with support from development finance institutions.
Global panorama on postal finaancial inclusion business models and key issuesDr Lendy Spires
This document provides a summary of a report by the Universal Postal Union (UPU) on postal financial inclusion around the world. The report examines the business models used by postal operators to provide financial services, identifies key issues in postal financial inclusion, and creates an index to rank countries based on their postal operators' ability to foster financial inclusion. It finds that one billion people are currently banked through postal financial services. The report aims to fill knowledge gaps and help postal operators and governments seize opportunities to expand access to financial services.
This policy aims to enhance IFAD's engagement with indigenous peoples in rural areas by setting out principles and approaches to empower them to overcome poverty in a way that respects their identity and culture. It establishes nine principles to guide IFAD's work, including recognition of cultural heritage, free prior and informed consent, community-driven development, and land/resource rights. The policy draws on IFAD's experience working with indigenous communities, international standards, and consultations. It will strengthen existing programs and establish new knowledge sharing to implement these principles throughout the project cycle.
Partnering with Civil Society. 12 Lessons from DAC Peer Reviews. OECDDominique Gross
This booklet is about partnerships between DAC members and civil society organisations (CSOs) which can serve many purposes. These include, as reflected in the Busan Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation (2011), supporting the vital role that CSOs play in enabling people to claim their rights, in promoting rights-based approaches, in shaping development policies and partnerships and in overseeing their implementation, in providing services in areas that are complementary to those provided by states and in contributing to and raising public awareness about global development challenges and results. Partnerships related to humanitarian assistance are examined in more detail in an earlier publication in this series: “Towards Better Humanitarian Donorship: 12 Lessons from DAC Peer Reviews” (OECD, 2012a).
Despite the significant share of official development assistance (ODA) flowing to and through CSOs (16.2% of ODA of DAC member countries in 2010), there are few shared guidelines, benchmarks or documented good practices that DAC members can follow when partnering with civil society. At the same time, DAC peer reviews provide recommendations, evidence and examples of how different members work with CSOs, the challenges they face and good practice.
DAC member countries can improve partnerships with civil society organizations by developing comprehensive civil society policies. These policies should be evidence-based, clarify objectives for supporting civil society, and be designed in consultation with CSOs. Specifically, the policies should be included in overarching development strategies, continuously assess assumptions about CSO roles, and establish measurable commitments like those in the Busan agreement. Regular reviews involving CSOs can help ensure the policies adapt to changing needs. Strong civil society policies provide a strategic framework to guide effective and mutually beneficial cooperation.
DAC Guidlines for Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment in Development Co-o...Dr Lendy Spires
This document provides guidelines for promoting gender equality and women's empowerment in development cooperation. It outlines that development must benefit both women and men to be sustainable and effective. The guidelines emphasize mainstreaming gender equality as a development objective across all policies and programs, rather than treating it as a separate sector. It recommends strategies for Development Assistance Committee (DAC) members and partners to integrate gender equality, including through policy dialogue, country analyses, program assistance, and sectoral reform. The document establishes a common commitment among DAC members to promote gender equality and monitor progress on the guidelines. It concludes that achieving gender equality is essential for meeting broader economic, social, and environmental goals in the development agenda.
OCDE ESTRATEGIAS PARA EL DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLEAnibal Aguilar
Libro de la OCDE sobre Estrategias del Desarrollo Sostenible, aprobadas por Ministros OCDE y desarrolla por equipo mundial para elaborar documento, me toco coordinar por America Latina
Good practice in donor engagement with civil society creating an enabling env...Dr Lendy Spires
This document summarizes a briefing paper on the OECD Development Assistance Committee's (DAC) "Twelve Lessons from DAC Peer Reviews" on partnering with civil society organizations (CSOs). The 12 lessons are intended to identify good practices between donors and CSOs based on DAC peer reviews. However, the summary argues that the lessons could be strengthened by more fully recognizing the diversity and independence of CSOs as development actors, and providing clearer policy guidance for donors on enabling an environment for CSOs.
A history of the UNs involvement in multi stakeholderFelix Dodds
This document provides a summary of the UN's increasing involvement with multi-stakeholder partnerships over time. Some key points:
- The 1992 Earth Summit's Agenda 21 first gave non-state stakeholders rights and responsibilities to engage in implementing UN plans.
- The 2000 Millennium Development Goals and 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development emphasized partnerships between governments and other stakeholders.
- Guidelines for partnerships have been developed addressing criteria like transparency and accountability.
- The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and 2015 resolution on global partnerships further promote effective public, private, and civil society partnerships to achieve sustainable development goals.
The document discusses the United Kingdom's Development Assistance Committee (DAC) peer review. It describes the peer review process, where representatives from two DAC members examine the UK's development policies and programs through interviews and field visits. The findings and recommendations from the peer review are presented to the DAC for discussion. The document also provides an overview of the UK's development assistance, including its legal framework, whole-of-government approach, strategic framework with poverty reduction as the objective, and engagement in fragile states.
JUNE 2014
DACnews is designed to help development practitioners keep abreast of DAC work so that we can increase its reach and impact. We would very much appreciate your helping us to reach as wide an audience as possible by forwarding this sign-up link to people you feel may be interested.
Anything new in development?
Innovation is a frequently used word in development circles. And indeed, finding new ways of working – and creating broader partnerships – is increasingly important. This DACnews looks at several ways in which the DAC is innovating: by welcoming new members such as Iceland and the Czech Republic; by intensifying the dialogue on triangular co-operation; by looking at development co-operation from the receiving end and factoring in the e-revolution; and by deepening understanding of how to green development. It also celebrates 30 years of the DAC Evaluation Network.
1) In 1992, Agenda 21 called for countries to develop national strategies for sustainable development, but provided no guidance. By 2002, most countries had still not introduced strategies.
2) In 1999, the OECD launched a project with 8 developing countries to clarify what effective national strategies entail. This involved stakeholder dialogues and reviews of existing sustainable development processes.
3) The project resulted in the first definition of a national strategy for sustainable development as a "coordinated set of participatory and continuously improving processes" that seeks to integrate economic, social and environmental objectives.
Session.3.Yared_.Tsegay.Global forum VLR.pptxxordan95
This document discusses a national capacity building workshop on Voluntary Local Reviews (VLRs) in South Africa that will take place on March 27-28, 2023. It provides background on national SDG advisory bodies and their role in supporting SDG implementation. It summarizes South Africa's progress and challenges in achieving the SDGs to date, and identifies priority areas of action. It outlines the potential benefits of VLRs for enhancing SDG localization and implementation at the local level through bottom-up participation and responsive, community-led solutions.
Session.3.Yared_.Tsegay.Global forum VLR.pptxaryan524
This document discusses a national capacity building workshop on Voluntary Local Reviews (VLRs) in South Africa that will take place on March 27-28, 2023. It provides background on national SDG advisory bodies and their role in supporting SDG implementation. It summarizes South Africa's progress and challenges in achieving the SDGs to date, and identifies priority areas of action. It outlines the potential benefits of VLRs for enhancing SDG localization and implementation at the local level through bottom-up participation and locally-led solutions.
A progrss report in implementing the paris declarationDr Lendy Spires
This document provides a progress report on implementing the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness. It summarizes the commitments under the five Partnership Principles of ownership, harmonization, alignment, results and mutual accountability. It finds progress has been made but a step change is needed to meet 2010 targets. It provides emerging lessons for further strengthening ownership and national leadership. Alignment requires using country systems and strategies, building capacity, improving public financial management, including aid in budgets, making aid more predictable, and reforming procurement. Harmonization involves common arrangements, simplifying procedures, complementarity between donors, and improving donor systems. Further rationalizing aid delivery is still needed.
THE DAC GLOBAL RELATIONS STRATEGY NOVEMBER 2011 T he Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is committed to stepping up its efforts to engage with actors beyond its membership. In November 2011, it adopted a new global relations strategy, aiming to strengthen participation of non-member economies in the committee and promote collaboration with a larger group of development actors. What is at stake? The international development community is broadening its reach and mobilising increasing support to help developing countries reduce poverty and promote sustainable, inclusive growth. In light of the increasing diversity of actors and dynamism of the international development co-operation landscape, there is a growing need to share good practice and to facilitate more collaboration with one another. The DAC global relations strategy guides the DAC’s effort to engage with non-member economies and organisations in order to ensure the quality, inclusiveness and impact of the committee’s work. Its overall objectives are: 1. To enrich policy dialogue and knowledge-sharing on development co-operation 2. To ensure the DAC decision-making and dialogue processes are more inclusive 3. To promote a more effective development co-operation architecture Who is invited to engage with the DAC? The DAC will collaborate with several groups of development actors, aiming to share experiences and views on development and development co-operation, to share expertise on development co-operation management and statistics, to increase information exchange regarding co- operation activities and financial flows, and to engage in policy dialogue on the global development co-operation architecture and a post- Millennium Development Goal (MDG) development framework. The DAC will reach out to the following partners: • Bilateral providers of development co-operation, particularly OECD non-DAC members, major emerging economies, European Union member states not members of the OECD, and Arab donors • International organisations • Developing countries • Private sector • Private foundations • Civil society organisations How will the DAC collaborate with non-members?
Evaluation Development Activities - 12 Lessons from the OECD DACDr Lendy Spires
This document outlines 12 lessons for evaluating development activities based on the experience of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's Development Assistance Committee (OECD DAC). It discusses the importance of basing development policy decisions on evidence from evaluations, making learning an integral part of development cooperation, and clearly defining the role of evaluation. It also emphasizes the need to match evaluation ambitions with adequate resources, strengthen program design and management systems, ask the right evaluation questions, and choose appropriate evaluation tools. Finally, it stresses acting on evaluation findings, effectively communicating results, and evaluating the evaluators themselves. The overall aim is to enhance the culture of learning in development cooperation and better demonstrate the results and impacts of development activities.
The document summarizes UNCDF's annual report for 2013. It discusses UNCDF's work with partners to promote inclusive finance and local development finance in least developed countries. Key points include:
- UNCDF works with partners in 33 LDCs to provide investment capital and technical support to both public and private sectors.
- In 2013, UNCDF continued innovating in inclusive finance and local development finance, leveraging synergies between the two areas.
- UNCDF's unique mandate allows it to deliver high leverage from both public and private partners' investments in LDCs.
Towards policy coherence for inclusive and sustainable developmentPCDACCOUNT
1) The document discusses policy coherence for inclusive and sustainable development, noting that PCD aims to inform policymaking in all countries to achieve shared goals like those in the post-2015 agenda.
2) It outlines OECD's contributions to PCD, like adapting its definition, identifying different levels for coherence, and developing indicators.
3) PCD is presented as a tool to help governments strengthen integrated policy approaches and identify trade-offs to reconcile domestic and global objectives for sustainable development.
The document discusses multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development. It notes that partnerships between state and non-state actors are increasingly important for implementing sustainable development goals. The Rio+20 conference highlighted the role of non-state actors in shaping international agendas. It established an online registry to track voluntary commitments by partnerships. The High-Level Political Forum should provide oversight of partnerships and clarify accountability mechanisms.
The document discusses multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development. It notes that partnerships between state and non-state actors are increasingly important for implementing sustainable development goals. The Rio+20 conference highlighted the role of non-state actors in shaping international agendas. It established an online registry to track voluntary commitments by partnerships. The High-Level Political Forum should provide oversight of partnerships and ensure accountability and transparency in their contributions toward sustainable development.
Multi-stakeholder partnerships play an increasingly important role in implementing sustainable development. Such partnerships involve collaboration between state and non-state actors like organizations, businesses, and civil society. The Rio+20 Conference highlighted their importance and led to over 700 voluntary commitments being registered. The UN established an online registry to track these commitments and promote transparency. The High-Level Political Forum is discussing how to best support partnerships and ensure accountability in achieving sustainable development goals.
Accountable and effective development cooperation in a post 2015 eraDr Lendy Spires
This policy brief summarizes recent developments in regional and global mutual accountability mechanisms for development cooperation since 2010. It finds that mechanisms now utilize more balanced data sources, better represent different development actors, provide sufficiently frequent assessments, and are increasing efforts to engage civil society. However, challenges remain to consolidate the landscape of mechanisms, produce more evidence for decision-making, enhance relevance of assessments, and facilitate stakeholder engagement. The brief recommends undertaking a mapping of mechanisms, facilitating research on accountability and evidence, making better use of data, and assessing capacity needs to strengthen dialogue on development cooperation.
Accountable and effective development cooperation in a post 2015 era
Oecd dac summary
1. Pamphlet No. 13
THE ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION
AND DEVELOPMENT'S
DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE (DAC)
Summary: The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) is a
forum in which the major bilateral donors work together to
support sustainable development in developing countries. While the
DAC does not specifically address minority issues as such, it
frequently consults with civil society, including minority
populations, in the process of establishing its own policy guidelines.
The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is an
international organization and is composed of some of the world's wealthiest States.
Founded in 1961, one of the main aims of the OECD is the promotion of policies to
stimulate and harmonize its Members' efforts in favour of developing countries.
Member States of OECD are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech
Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland,
Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden,
Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and
the United States of America.
The Development Assistance Committee
The OECD's Development Assistance Committee (DAC) is the principal body
through which the OECD handles issues related to cooperation with developing
countries. The DAC is one of the key forums in which the major bilateral donors
work together to support sustainable development. Members of the DAC are
expected to have certain common objectives governing their aid programmes.
The mission of the DAC is to foster coordinated, integrated, effective and
adequately financed international efforts in support of sustainable economic and
social development. In 1999, total net resource flows from DAC member countries
and multilateral agencies to aid recipients amounted to US$248 billion, including
some US$51.3 billion in Official Development Assistance.
Recognizing that developing countries are ultimately responsible for their own
development, the DAC concentrates on helping developing countries to participate
in the global economy and helping people to overcome poverty and participate fully
in their societies.
2. DAC meetings are attended by Paris-based delegates of Member countries and by
officials from Member-country capitals. Once a year, senior-level officials from aid
agencies gather at the DAC to take stock of the overall aid effort and to review the
DAC's work on current policy issues. The Committee also holds an annual High-
Level Meeting for Ministers or heads of aid agencies. The High-Level Meeting
provides an opportunity, at the political level, to adopt basic policy directions for the
Committee’s work and for the common efforts of its Members.
The DAC has also established working parties, expert groups, temporary task forces
and informal networks, in which DAC Members are generally represented by
specialists. Their respective mandates reflect the Committee’s major interests:
poverty reduction; financial aspects of development assistance; development
assistance and the environment; statistics; aid evaluation; gender equality; good
governance and capacity development; conflict, peace and development; and
harmonization of donor practices.
Members of the DAC are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Commission of the
European Communities, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland,
Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Spain,
Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland,
and the United States of America.
The DAC'S Work
The DAC is increasingly involved in supporting developing countries’ efforts to
strengthen local capacities to pursue integrated development strategies.
A landmark report, “Shaping the 21st Century: The Contribution of Development
Cooperation”, was adopted by the DAC and endorsed by the OECD Ministerial
Council in 1996. This report sets out a vision for a global partnership in favour of
sustainable development. The report:
· frames the vision with a set of basic goals of measurable progress over the next
20 years in economic well-being, social development and environmental
sustainability
· describes a strategy of development cooperation in pursuit of those goals
through partnerships that respect the primary responsibility of the people,
institutions and governments of developing countries for their own progress, and
that offer international support for their efforts, based on shared interests
· expresses a commitment to work together to reinforce the self-help efforts of
developing countries with adequate resources, improved coordination and consistent
policies that support development and that are accompanied by continuous
monitoring and evaluation
The 21st Century report built upon a foundation of two previous policy statements
that had been adopted by the DAC in 1989 and in 1995. In the first of these,
“Development Cooperation in the 1990s”, DAC Members concluded that the
Pamphlet No. 13 of the UN Guide for Minorities 2
3. self-perpetuating cycle of underdevelopment, linking high population growth,
poverty, malnutrition, illiteracy, and environmental degradation, could only be
broken through integrated economic and developmental strategies and policies.
Primary Activities
Adopting authoritative policy guidelines
The DAC adopts authoritative policy guidelines to be used by Members in
designing and implementing their development cooperation programmes. These
guidelines reflect the views and experiences of the Members and benefit from
input by multilateral institutions and individual experts, including experts from
developing countries. Consultations with partner countries, including
representatives from government and civil society, are also part of the process of
adopting these guidelines. Guidelines adopted prior to 1992 were published that
year in a compilation entitled Development Assistance Manual: DAC Principles
for Effective Aid. Subsequently adopted guidelines have been published
individually in a Development Co-operation Guidelines Series, inaugurated in
1995. While DAC guidelines are non-binding, Members who adopt them make a
firm commitment to implement them to the extent possible. The themes addressed
by DAC guidelines include:
Development Assistance Manual: DAC Principles for Effective Aid
· Guiding Principles for Aid Coordination with Developing Countries
· DAC Principles for Project Appraisal
· Principles for New Orientations in Technical Cooperation
· Principles for Programme Assistance
· Good Practices for Environmental Impact Assessment of Development Projects
· Good Procurement Practices for Official Development Assistance
· New Measures in the Field of Tied Aid
· Principles for the Evaluation of Development Assistance
Development Cooperation Guidelines Series
· Participatory Development and Good Governance
· Support of Private Sector Development
· Donor Assistance to Capacity Development in Environment
· Conflict, Peace and Development Cooperation
· Gender Equality and Empowerment of Women
New Guidelines Endorsed at the 2001 DAC High Level Meeting
· Poverty Reduction
· Strategies for Sustainable Development
· Helping Prevent Violent Conflict: Orientations for External Partners
· Capacity Development for Trade in the New Global Context
Pamphlet No. 13 of the UN Guide for Minorities 3
4. Conducting periodic critical reviews
The DAC conducts periodic critical reviews of its Members’ development
cooperation programmes. These peer reviews, occurring at three- to four-year
intervals, examine how each individual Member programme applies DAC policy
guidelines, how the programme is managed (including coordination with other
donors), coherence of other policies with development objectives and trends in the
volume and allocation of resources. Each review is based on investigations by the
Secretariat and on reports by examiners appointed from two Member countries.
Their investigations include broad consultations, including with non-governmental
actors in development cooperation activities, in the capital of the donor country
under review. Sometimes, those Members under review organize special events
involving civil society organizations.
The reviews also include an average of two field missions to major partner
countries of the Member under review. During those missions, the review team
has consultations with NGOs and other civil society organizations in the partner
country visited. The process culminates in a meeting of the full DAC at which the
major issues identified in the examination are discussed. A summary of the
findings and conclusions of the Committee and the detailed report of the
Secretariat are published in the Development Cooperation Review Series. The
OECD is the only international organization dealing with development issues that
conducts such reviews.
Providing forums for dialogue
The DAC provides a forum for dialogue, exchange of experiences and the
building of international consensus on policy and management issues of interest to
Members. Particular themes, such as strategies for poverty eradication and
expanding and integrating all sources of funding for development, emerge from
the Senior Level and High-Level meetings and from the annual work programme
and medium-term priorities. Since 1998, the DAC has organized Development
Partnership Forums on key issues in partnership and local ownership. These are
usually held back-to-back with the DAC Senior Level Meeting. Participants in
these Forums include representatives from civil society in both DAC member and
partner countries. The most recent Develop Partnership Forum, held in December
2000, addressed the role of civil society, in both the North and South, in poverty-reduction
strategies (see box below).
Publishing statistics and reports
The DAC publishes statistics and reports on aid and other resource flows to
developing countries and countries in transition, and on related matters, based
principally on reporting by DAC Members. These authoritative statistics and
reports are widely used and frequently cited in publications related to
development.
Pamphlet No. 13 of the UN Guide for Minorities 4
5. Further Information and Contacts
For more information, the OECD Development Assistance Committee's web site
(www.oecd.org/dac) provides access to some of the most important work of the
DAC. Or you can contact:
Publications Unit
Development Cooperation Directorate
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
2 rue André Pascal
75775 PARIS CEDEX 16
France
Telephone: +33 (0) 1-45-24-17-89; Fax: +33 (0) 1-44-30-61-40
Pamphlet No. 13 of the UN Guide for Minorities 5
6. Development Partnership Forum 2000
OWNERSHIP AND PARTNERSHIP: THE ROLE OF NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CIVIL SOCIETY IN
THE POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGIES
11-12 December 2000
The Development Partnership Forum 2000 brought together over 150 participants from governments and civil
society, including representatives of business associations, NGOs, churches, trade unions, media, and
Parliamentarians, both from DAC Member countries and partner countries, together with DAC Member
delegations and observers, including representatives from DAC Member country civil society.
The Forum proposed a large number of concrete measures to bolster participation of civil society. A detailed
report by the DAC and the Development Centre will be made available in 2001. The following points provide a
preliminary overview of the Forum.
1. The involvement of civil society, in addition to partner country governments and the private sector, is
becoming an operational feature of poverty reduction strategies, for reasons which are both political
(ownership) and practical (active participation in pro-poor growth policies, effective and accountable
implementation and realism check). To establish and implement successful participatory poverty reduction
strategies, country ownership must involve all stakeholders.
2. Civil society is not homogeneous. It comprises many and diverse actors, each with their own interests and
responsibilities. While this may complicate the consultation process, narrowing the selection of actors
involved could hinder the entire process.
3. Adequate consultation processes need time. The absence of adequate consultation of civil society may speed
up the process, but it does not foster true ownership. . The sense of urgency in launching Poverty Reduction
Strategy Papers (PRSPs) should not mean that consultations are forfeited.
4. Engaging citizens and civil society actors in the consultation process is a formidable challenge in terms of
time and resources for partner countries. Fostering partnership and participation of all stakeholders in an
effective manner will require investment in capacity building and further evolution in aid agencies’
operations, in particular simplification and harmonisation of their procedures. It must be a joint endeavour.
5. Creating the enabling environment for civil society capacity building also calls for recognition of the
importance and cost of international networking and South-South collaboration by civil society actors.
Development co-operation may have a decisive role in this respect.
6. Civil society should be allocated resources in a way that is conducive to the choice of specific activities
chosen by civil society actors, but clearly governed by standards for accountability (in particular with respect
to the poor), transparency, efficiency and effectiveness. Bilateral and multilateral official aid agencies should
share these standards.
7. Donors should increase efforts to inform and educate public opinion on the objectives, principles and
implementation of the partnership strategy, setting whenever appropriate a target percentage for the financing
of development information and education in their own countries.
8. Civil society actors in partner countries should be encouraged to play a more active role in advocating sound
and effective poverty reduction strategies.
9. Opening up space for the advocacy role of civil society actors in partner countries will be of particular
importance in situations where entering into a genuine partnership for poverty reduction has not yet been
established as a policy priority, or when partnership is impeded by conflict situations.
10. Accountability and transparency can be enhanced through increased support for the media (traditional print
and communication as well as modern IT applications). Moreover, the media is an important guardian against
corruption. Media coverage of the whole partnership process at work, e.g. the elaboration of PRSPs should be
facilitated through real dialogue and not restricted to briefings and press handouts. This is important in order
to stimulate local participation and ownership, and should lead, in the North, to increased confidence in and
understanding of policy making in the South.
Pamphlet No. 13 of the UN Guide for Minorities 6