-Neutrino-
It's believed that modern physics nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. The astonishing results of the experiment seem to show that elementary particle Neutrinos, Can. It’s the most spread particles and the lightest. Neutrino is a hardly reacting with matter, It can travel right through the earth without interacting, As an example 70 billion Neutrinos per square second continue coming from the sun. These Neutrino parts traveled through the Earth Crust to the detection point and they synchronized between the 2 points to the nearest Nanno second (A billion of a second) in this distance, they discovered that the neutrino were 60 seconds ahead of what light takes to cover this distance. It's the first time we have an experimental evidence something faster than light and that will make a major change in physics as we know it now.
-Neutrino-
It's believed that modern physics nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. The astonishing results of the experiment seem to show that elementary particle Neutrinos, Can. It’s the most spread particles and the lightest. Neutrino is a hardly reacting with matter, It can travel right through the earth without interacting, As an example 70 billion Neutrinos per square second continue coming from the sun. These Neutrino parts traveled through the Earth Crust to the detection point and they synchronized between the 2 points to the nearest Nanno second (A billion of a second) in this distance, they discovered that the neutrino were 60 seconds ahead of what light takes to cover this distance. It's the first time we have an experimental evidence something faster than light and that will make a major change in physics as we know it now.
Radio imaging obserations_of_psr_j1023_0038_in_an_lmxb_stateSérgio Sacani
Uma estrela super densa formada depois da explosão de uma supernova está expelindo poderosos jatos de material no espaço, sugerem pesquisas recentes.
Num estudo publicado no dia 6 de Agosto de 2015, uma equipe de cientistas na Austrália e na Holanda descobriram poderosos jatos sendo expelidos de uma sistema estelar duplo conhecido como PSR J1023+0038.
Pensava-se anteriormente que os únicos objetos no universo capazes de formar jatos poderosos eram os buracos negros.
O sistema PSR J1023+0038 contém uma estrela extremamente densa que os astrônomos chamam de estrela de nêutrons, numa órbita próxima com uma estrela normal.
Ela foi identificada primeiro como uma estrela de nêutrons em 2009, mas foi somente quando a equipe de pesquisa observou a estrela com o rádio telescópio Very Large Array nos EUA em 2013 e 2014 que eles perceberam que a estrela estava produzindo jatos mais fortes do que se esperava.
Os astrônomos James Miller-Jones, do International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research (ICRAR), disse que as estrelas de nêutrons podem ser pensadas como cadáveres estelares.
“Elas são formadas quando uma estrela massiva esgota todo o seu combustível e vira uma supernova, e as partes centrais da estrela colapsam sobre sua própria gravidade”, disse ele.
“Essas coisas tem normalmente entre uma vez e meia a massa do Sol e somente entre 10 a 15 km de diâmetro, de modo que são extremamente densas”.
Lattice Energy LLC - HESS Collaboration reports evidence for PeV cosmic rays ...Lewis Larsen
HESS Collaboration has published important paper in Nature: detected gamma rays coming from Milky Way’s black hole indicating that PeV cosmic rays come from same source. Widom-Larsen-Srivastava theory provides many-body collective mechanism that can accelerate protons to PeV and higher energies in the immediate vicinity of such black holes. Cosmic ray particle energies depend upon field strength in magnetic structures, size of structure, and duration of charged particle accleration.
Discrete and broadband electron acceleration in Jupiter’s powerful auroraSérgio Sacani
The most intense auroral emissions from Earth’s polar regions,
called discrete for their sharply defined spatial configurations, are
generated by a process involving coherent acceleration of electrons
by slowly evolving, powerful electric fields directed along the
magnetic field lines that connect Earth’s space environment to its
polar regions1,2. In contrast, Earth’s less intense auroras are generally
caused by wave scattering of magnetically trapped populations of
hot electrons (in the case of diffuse aurora) or by the turbulent or
stochastic downward acceleration of electrons along magnetic field
lines by waves during transitory periods (in the case of broadband
or Alfvénic aurora)3,4. Jupiter’s relatively steady main aurora has a
power density that is so much larger than Earth’s that it has been
taken for granted that it must be generated primarily by the discrete
auroral process5–7. However, preliminary in situ measurements of
Jupiter’s auroral regions yielded no evidence of such a process8–10.
Here we report observations of distinct, high-energy, downward,
discrete electron acceleration in Jupiter’s auroral polar regions. We
also infer upward magnetic-field-aligned electric potentials of up to
400 kiloelectronvolts, an order of magnitude larger than the largest
potentials observed at Earth11. Despite the magnitude of these
upward electric potentials and the expectations from observations
at Earth, the downward energy flux from discrete acceleration is less
at Jupiter than that caused by broadband or stochastic processes,
with broadband and stochastic characteristics that are substantially
different from those at Earth.
The seemingly impossible task of recording what is beyond the line of sight is possible due to ultra‐fast imaging. A new form of photography, Femto-photography exploits the finite speed of light and analyzes 'echoes of light'.
Femto-photography consists of femtosecond laser illumination, picosecond-accurate detectors and mathematical inversion techniques. By emitting short laser pulses and analyzing multi-bounce reflections we can estimate hidden geometry. In transient light transport, we account for the fact that speed of light is finite. Light travels ~1 foot/nanosecond and by sampling the light at pico-second resolution, we can estimate shapes with centimeter accuracy.
Potential applications include search and rescue planning in hazardous conditions, collision avoidance for cars, and robots in industrial environments. Transient imaging also has significant potential benefits in medical imaging that could allow endoscopes to view around obstacles inside the human body.
FROM UNDERSTANDING BASIC PARTICLE PHYSICS —to exploring the Universe During the first half of 2013, a number of startling advances in astro-particle physics have been announced. In addition to this--the next ultra large cosmic ray experiment is being developed, regions of the world (including southwest Kansas) tested for their suitability to host such an experiment. In this talk you will get a brief introduction of the ideas of particle physics and how they are being transformed into astro-particle measurements to further understand the Universe and the forces within it.
Radio imaging obserations_of_psr_j1023_0038_in_an_lmxb_stateSérgio Sacani
Uma estrela super densa formada depois da explosão de uma supernova está expelindo poderosos jatos de material no espaço, sugerem pesquisas recentes.
Num estudo publicado no dia 6 de Agosto de 2015, uma equipe de cientistas na Austrália e na Holanda descobriram poderosos jatos sendo expelidos de uma sistema estelar duplo conhecido como PSR J1023+0038.
Pensava-se anteriormente que os únicos objetos no universo capazes de formar jatos poderosos eram os buracos negros.
O sistema PSR J1023+0038 contém uma estrela extremamente densa que os astrônomos chamam de estrela de nêutrons, numa órbita próxima com uma estrela normal.
Ela foi identificada primeiro como uma estrela de nêutrons em 2009, mas foi somente quando a equipe de pesquisa observou a estrela com o rádio telescópio Very Large Array nos EUA em 2013 e 2014 que eles perceberam que a estrela estava produzindo jatos mais fortes do que se esperava.
Os astrônomos James Miller-Jones, do International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research (ICRAR), disse que as estrelas de nêutrons podem ser pensadas como cadáveres estelares.
“Elas são formadas quando uma estrela massiva esgota todo o seu combustível e vira uma supernova, e as partes centrais da estrela colapsam sobre sua própria gravidade”, disse ele.
“Essas coisas tem normalmente entre uma vez e meia a massa do Sol e somente entre 10 a 15 km de diâmetro, de modo que são extremamente densas”.
Lattice Energy LLC - HESS Collaboration reports evidence for PeV cosmic rays ...Lewis Larsen
HESS Collaboration has published important paper in Nature: detected gamma rays coming from Milky Way’s black hole indicating that PeV cosmic rays come from same source. Widom-Larsen-Srivastava theory provides many-body collective mechanism that can accelerate protons to PeV and higher energies in the immediate vicinity of such black holes. Cosmic ray particle energies depend upon field strength in magnetic structures, size of structure, and duration of charged particle accleration.
Discrete and broadband electron acceleration in Jupiter’s powerful auroraSérgio Sacani
The most intense auroral emissions from Earth’s polar regions,
called discrete for their sharply defined spatial configurations, are
generated by a process involving coherent acceleration of electrons
by slowly evolving, powerful electric fields directed along the
magnetic field lines that connect Earth’s space environment to its
polar regions1,2. In contrast, Earth’s less intense auroras are generally
caused by wave scattering of magnetically trapped populations of
hot electrons (in the case of diffuse aurora) or by the turbulent or
stochastic downward acceleration of electrons along magnetic field
lines by waves during transitory periods (in the case of broadband
or Alfvénic aurora)3,4. Jupiter’s relatively steady main aurora has a
power density that is so much larger than Earth’s that it has been
taken for granted that it must be generated primarily by the discrete
auroral process5–7. However, preliminary in situ measurements of
Jupiter’s auroral regions yielded no evidence of such a process8–10.
Here we report observations of distinct, high-energy, downward,
discrete electron acceleration in Jupiter’s auroral polar regions. We
also infer upward magnetic-field-aligned electric potentials of up to
400 kiloelectronvolts, an order of magnitude larger than the largest
potentials observed at Earth11. Despite the magnitude of these
upward electric potentials and the expectations from observations
at Earth, the downward energy flux from discrete acceleration is less
at Jupiter than that caused by broadband or stochastic processes,
with broadband and stochastic characteristics that are substantially
different from those at Earth.
The seemingly impossible task of recording what is beyond the line of sight is possible due to ultra‐fast imaging. A new form of photography, Femto-photography exploits the finite speed of light and analyzes 'echoes of light'.
Femto-photography consists of femtosecond laser illumination, picosecond-accurate detectors and mathematical inversion techniques. By emitting short laser pulses and analyzing multi-bounce reflections we can estimate hidden geometry. In transient light transport, we account for the fact that speed of light is finite. Light travels ~1 foot/nanosecond and by sampling the light at pico-second resolution, we can estimate shapes with centimeter accuracy.
Potential applications include search and rescue planning in hazardous conditions, collision avoidance for cars, and robots in industrial environments. Transient imaging also has significant potential benefits in medical imaging that could allow endoscopes to view around obstacles inside the human body.
FROM UNDERSTANDING BASIC PARTICLE PHYSICS —to exploring the Universe During the first half of 2013, a number of startling advances in astro-particle physics have been announced. In addition to this--the next ultra large cosmic ray experiment is being developed, regions of the world (including southwest Kansas) tested for their suitability to host such an experiment. In this talk you will get a brief introduction of the ideas of particle physics and how they are being transformed into astro-particle measurements to further understand the Universe and the forces within it.
The Schwadron IBEX Ribbon Retention Theory and its possible Impact on Astrono...Peter Palme 高 彼特
Ribbon in Space around our Solar Syxstem discovered by IBEX – NASA
Will it have an impact on the current solar system and planet formation theory ?
Further:
Researchers from the University of Michigan announced today the discovery of tiny amounts of water in the moon rocks brought back to Earth by the Apollo missions were native water, and not water brought by meteors or other objects from space crashing into it. This discovery could in turn invalidate the current theory of how our Moon was formed
Youxue Zhang -
Peter Higgs - Higgs Boson - vacuum instability -
cylcle Universe formation - Galaxy formation
Joseph Lykken, a theoretical physicist at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Ill., said Monday (Feb. 18) at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science
A YOUNG PROTOPLANET CANDIDATE EMBEDDED IN THE CIRCUMSTELLAR DISK
Sascha P. Quanz1,2, Adam Amara2, Michael R. Meyer2, Matthew A. Kenworthy3, Markus Kasper4, and Julien H. Girard are currently observing a formation of a protoplanet
Hector Acre Yale University Herbig-Haro 46/47 ALMA Astrophysical Journal
NASA Van Allen Probes
Geoff Reeves
Andrew Hodges, mathematical physicist at Oxford University
Jacob Bourjaily, theoretical physicist at Harvard University
quantum field theory
Nima Arkani-Hamed, lead author, professor of physics at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J.
Amplituhedron
David Skinner, theoretical physicist at Cambridge University
Parke and Taylor guessed a simple one-term expression
BCFW recursion relations, named for Ruth Britto, Freddy Cachazo, Bo Feng and Edward Witten.
leading mathematicians such as Pierre Deligne, Arkani-Hamed and his collaborators discovered that the recursion relations and associated twistor diagrams corresponded to a well-known geometric object. In fact, as detailed in a paper posted to arXiv.org in December by Arkani-Hamed, Bourjaily, Cachazo, Alexander Goncharov, Alexander Postnikov and Jaroslav Trnka, the twistor diagrams gave instructions for calculating the volume of pieces of this object, called the positive Grassmannian.
Hermann Grassmann, a 19th-century German linguist and mathematici
Arkani-Hamed and Trnka discovered that the scattering amplitude equals the volume of a brand-new mathematical object — the amplituhedron
Neal Turner and colleagues at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory developped a three dimensional model where magnetism plays a key role in planet formation.
Laura Mersini-Houghton has so far the best theory to answer for the formation of galaxies. The Theory of the Landscape Multiverse The theory and its predictions are derived from fundamental physics and first principles by using quantum cosmology for the wavefunction of the universe on the landscape and calculating decoherence and quantum entanglement among various surviving branches
Chariklo Felipe Braga-Ribas National Observatory in Brazil
A planetary collision afterglow and transit of the resultant debris cloudSérgio Sacani
Planets grow in rotating disks of dust and gas around forming stars, some of which
can subsequently collide in giant impacts after the gas component is removed from
the disk1–3. Monitoring programmes with the warm Spitzer mission have recorded
substantial and rapid changes in mid-infrared output for several stars, interpreted
as variations in the surface area of warm, dusty material ejected by planetary-scale
collisions and heated by the central star: for example, NGC 2354–ID8 (refs. 4,5), HD
166191 (ref. 6) and V488 Persei7. Here we report combined observations of the young
(about 300 million years old), solar-like star ASASSN-21qj: an infrared brightening
consistent with a blackbody temperature of 1,000 Kelvin and a luminosity that is
4 percent that of the star lasting for about 1,000 days, partially overlapping in time
with a complex and deep, wavelength-dependent optical eclipse that lasted for
about 500 days. The optical eclipse started 2.5 years after the infrared brightening,
implying an orbital period of at least that duration. These observations are consistent
with a collision between two exoplanets of several to tens of Earth masses at 2–16
astronomical units from the central star. Such an impact produces a hot, highly
extended post-impact remnant with sufficient luminosity to explain the infrared
observations. Transit of the impact debris, sheared by orbital motion into a long
cloud, causes the subsequent complex eclipse of the host star.
A surge of light at the birth of a supernovaSérgio Sacani
It is difficult to establish the properties of massive stars that explode
as supernovae1,2
. The electromagnetic emission during the first
minutes to hours after the emergence of the shock from the stellar
surface conveys important information about the final evolution
and structure of the exploding star3–6. However, the unpredictable
nature of supernova events hinders the detection of this brief initial
phase7–9. Here we report the serendipitous discovery of a newly
born, normal type IIb supernova (SN 2016gkg)10, which reveals a
rapid brightening at optical wavelengths of about 40 magnitudes
per day. The very frequent sampling of the observations allowed
us to study in detail the outermost structure of the progenitor of
the supernova and the physics of the emergence of the shock. We
develop hydrodynamical models of the explosion that naturally
account for the complete evolution of the supernova over distinct
phases regulated by different physical processes. This result
suggests that it is appropriate to decouple the treatment of the
shock propagation from the unknown mechanism that triggers
the explosion.
In a groundbreaking achievement, astronomers have finally obtained direct observational evidence of the stellar process responsible for the formation of neutron stars and black holes.
hematic appreciation test is a psychological assessment tool used to measure an individual's appreciation and understanding of specific themes or topics. This test helps to evaluate an individual's ability to connect different ideas and concepts within a given theme, as well as their overall comprehension and interpretation skills. The results of the test can provide valuable insights into an individual's cognitive abilities, creativity, and critical thinking skills
ANAMOLOUS SECONDARY GROWTH IN DICOT ROOTS.pptxRASHMI M G
Abnormal or anomalous secondary growth in plants. It defines secondary growth as an increase in plant girth due to vascular cambium or cork cambium. Anomalous secondary growth does not follow the normal pattern of a single vascular cambium producing xylem internally and phloem externally.
Nucleophilic Addition of carbonyl compounds.pptxSSR02
Nucleophilic addition is the most important reaction of carbonyls. Not just aldehydes and ketones, but also carboxylic acid derivatives in general.
Carbonyls undergo addition reactions with a large range of nucleophiles.
Comparing the relative basicity of the nucleophile and the product is extremely helpful in determining how reversible the addition reaction is. Reactions with Grignards and hydrides are irreversible. Reactions with weak bases like halides and carboxylates generally don’t happen.
Electronic effects (inductive effects, electron donation) have a large impact on reactivity.
Large groups adjacent to the carbonyl will slow the rate of reaction.
Neutral nucleophiles can also add to carbonyls, although their additions are generally slower and more reversible. Acid catalysis is sometimes employed to increase the rate of addition.
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.moosaasad1975
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intellige...University of Maribor
Slides from talk:
Aleš Zamuda: Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intelligent Systems.
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Inter-Society Networking Panel GRSS/MTT-S/CIS Panel Session: Promoting Connection and Cooperation
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
This presentation explores a brief idea about the structural and functional attributes of nucleotides, the structure and function of genetic materials along with the impact of UV rays and pH upon them.
The ability to recreate computational results with minimal effort and actionable metrics provides a solid foundation for scientific research and software development. When people can replicate an analysis at the touch of a button using open-source software, open data, and methods to assess and compare proposals, it significantly eases verification of results, engagement with a diverse range of contributors, and progress. However, we have yet to fully achieve this; there are still many sociotechnical frictions.
Inspired by David Donoho's vision, this talk aims to revisit the three crucial pillars of frictionless reproducibility (data sharing, code sharing, and competitive challenges) with the perspective of deep software variability.
Our observation is that multiple layers — hardware, operating systems, third-party libraries, software versions, input data, compile-time options, and parameters — are subject to variability that exacerbates frictions but is also essential for achieving robust, generalizable results and fostering innovation. I will first review the literature, providing evidence of how the complex variability interactions across these layers affect qualitative and quantitative software properties, thereby complicating the reproduction and replication of scientific studies in various fields.
I will then present some software engineering and AI techniques that can support the strategic exploration of variability spaces. These include the use of abstractions and models (e.g., feature models), sampling strategies (e.g., uniform, random), cost-effective measurements (e.g., incremental build of software configurations), and dimensionality reduction methods (e.g., transfer learning, feature selection, software debloating).
I will finally argue that deep variability is both the problem and solution of frictionless reproducibility, calling the software science community to develop new methods and tools to manage variability and foster reproducibility in software systems.
Exposé invité Journées Nationales du GDR GPL 2024
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDASAMIR PANDA
Spectroscopy is a branch of science dealing the study of interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy refers to absorption spectroscopy or reflect spectroscopy in the UV-VIS spectral region.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy is an analytical method that can measure the amount of light received by the analyte.
BREEDING METHODS FOR DISEASE RESISTANCE.pptxRASHMI M G
Plant breeding for disease resistance is a strategy to reduce crop losses caused by disease. Plants have an innate immune system that allows them to recognize pathogens and provide resistance. However, breeding for long-lasting resistance often involves combining multiple resistance genes
Observations of cosmic neutrinos in the Kamiokande II detector
1. OBSERVATIONS OF COSMIC NEUTRINOS
IN THE KAMIOKANDE II DETECTOR
THE NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSICS, 2002
Wathan Pratumwan
2. 2
The Nobel Prize in Physics, 2002 was concerned
about new windows for astronomical observation.
“for pioneering contributions to
astrophysics, which have led to the
discovery of cosmic X-ray sources”
“for pioneering contributions to astrophysics, in
particular for the detection of cosmic neutrinos”
Masatoshi KoshibaRaymond Davis Jr.Ricardo Giacconi
<http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2002/>
3. II. Cosmic neutrino sources
‣ The Sun
‣ Supernovae
III. Kamiokande II detectorI. Neutrinos
IV. Observation results
‣ Supernova neutrinos
‣ Solar neutrinos
V. The outlook
COSMIC NEUTRINOS IN THE KAMIOKANDE II DETECTOR
4. INTRODUCTION | NEUTRINOS
Neutrinos are rarely interact with other matter.
4
<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Standard_Model_of_Elementary_Particles.svg>
`
Relative strength
(two protons in nucleus)
EM interaction = 1
weak interaction = 10-7
strong interaction = 20
5. THE SUN &
SUPERNOVAE
COSMIC NEUTRINO
SOURCES
<http://gallery.spitzer.caltech.edu/Imagegallery/image.php?image_name=ssc2005-14c>
6. INTRODUCTION | THE SUN
Nuclear fusions in the core energise the Sun and
produce neutrinos.
6
the standard solar model (SSM)
proton-proton chain
1H + 1H → 2H + e+ + νe
1H + e- + 1H → 2H + νe
3He + 1H → 4He + e+ + νe
2H + 1H → 3He + γ
3He + 4He → 7Be + γ
7Be + e- → 7Li + νe
3He + 3He → 4He + 21H 7Li + 1H → 4He + 4He
7Be + 1H → 8B + γ
8B → 8Be* + e+ + νe
8Be* → 4He + 4He
pp pep
hep
8B
7Be
ppI ppII
ppIII
99.77% 0.23%
84.92%
25.08%
99.9%
0.1%
10-5
%
8. INTRODUCTION | SUPERNOVAE
Core-collapse supernovae produce neutrinos
which ignite the explosions.
8
Neutrino burst (left) and accretion (right) stage of stellar core collapse
<http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.002>
electron capture
electron capture
pair creation
In a supernova, a star releases >99% of its
gravitational binding energy as neutrinos.
~ 1044 J
9. INTRODUCTION | SUPERNOVAE
Q: Which of the following would be brighter, in terms
of the amount of energy delivered to your retina?
9
<https://what-if.xkcd.com/73/>
a. A supernova, seen from as far away as the Sun is from
the Earth
b. The detonation of a hydrogen bomb pressed against
your eyeball?
Ans: a. is brighter by nine orders of magnitude!
Hint: However big you think supernovae are, they're bigger than that.
10. INTRODUCTION | NEUTRINOS AS A PROBE
Neutrino could travel undisturbedly.
10
The structure of the Sun
<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sun_poster.svg>
Neutrinos
Visible light
12. KAMIOKANDE EXPERIMENT | ORIGINAL KAMIOKANDE
KamiokaNDE aimed to search for proton decay.
12
<http://www-sk.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/uploads/slide-08.jpg>
‣ KamiokaNDE = Kamioka Nucleon Decay Experiment
‣ It was first designed to search for proton decay by
measuring the water Cherenkov radiation.
‣ The experiment was located in a mine under a mountain to
reduce backgrounds.
13. KAMIOKANDE EXPERIMENT | KAMIOKANDE II DETECTOR
Upgraded Kamiokande II aimed to detect solar
neutrinos.
13
Schematic outline of the Kamiokande II detector
<http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.38.448>
fiducial volume
2140-ton water
photomultiplier tube (PMT)
~20% of total surface of the
fiducial volume
anticounter
‣ shielding against gamma
rays and neutrons
‣ muon “veto”
‣ Real-time detection
‣ Directional sensitive
‣ Energy threshold of 8.8 MeV
14. KAMIOKANDE EXPERIMENT | NEUTRINO DETECTION
A neutrino generates a charged particle emitting
the Cherenkov radiation.
14
left <http://www-sk.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/sk/detector/howtodetect-e.html>
right <http://www.ps.uci.edu/~tomba/sk/tscan/compare_mu_e/>
ν + e- → ν + e-ν̅e + p → n + e+
Neutrino…
‣ arrival time
‣ direction
‣ energy
The Cherenkov ring emitted by an electron
and detected by PMTs
16. 10 days afterBefore
Australian Astronomical Observatory
KAMIOKANDE EXPERIMENT | SUPERNOVA NEUTRINOS
Supernova 1987A was discovered on 24 Feb. 1987.
16
SN 1987A
‣ Type
‣ Host galaxy
‣ Distance
‣ Discovery
Type II (peculiar)
Large Magellanic Cloud
167,885 light-years
24 Feb. 1987 (23:00 UTC)
17. KAMIOKANDE EXPERIMENT | SUPERNOVA NEUTRINOS
A neutrino burst was detected on 23 Feb. 1987,
7:35:35 UTC
17
A time sequence of events in a 45-sec interval entered on 23 February 1987, 7:35:35 UTC.
<http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1490>
19. KAMIOKANDE EXPERIMENT | SOLAR NEUTRINOS
The 450-days sample showed an enhancement in
the direction of the Sun.
19
Distribution in the cosine of the angle between the electron trajectory
and the direction of the Sun <http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.16>
20. KAMIOKANDE EXPERIMENT | SOLAR NEUTRINOS
The measured 8B neutrino flux is lower than the prediction
by the standard solar model.
20
KAM-II data
SSM
= 0.46 ± 0.13(stat.) ± 0.08(syst.)
Energy distribution of the solar neutrino signal.
The histogram is the distribution predicted by SSM.
<http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.16>
The deficiency was consistent with
the result from Davis’ experiment.
22. THE OUTLOOK
Impacts of the Kamiokande II experiment on
astronomy, astrophysics and particle physics
22
‣ Cherenkov detectors for neutrinos
‣ Neutrino telescopes for neutrino astronomy
‣ Core-collapse mechanism of supernova
‣ Supernova Early Warning System (SNEWS)
‣ The solar neutrino problem ▶︎ neutrino oscillations
23. SUMMARY
Observations of cosmic neutrinos in
the Kamiokande II detector
23
a) Solar neutrinos
‣ enhanced in the
direction of the Sun
‣ lower than prediction
b) Supernova neutrinos
‣ high-flux burst signal
‣ arrived before light
detect neutrinos with
the water Cherenkov radiation
28. EXTRA
Supernova neutrinos
Scatter plot of the detected electron energy
and the cosine of the angle between the
measured electron direction and the
direction of the Large Magellanic Cloud.
<http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.38.448>
The Nobel Prize in Physics, 2002 was concerned about discoveries of new windows for astronomical observation. A half of the prize went to Ricardo Giacconi for the discovery of cosmic x-ray sources. The other half was jointly awarded to Raymond Davis Jr. of the Homestake experiment and Masatoshi Koshiba of the Kamiokande experiment for the detection of cosmic neutrinos.
Today, I will present you the observations of cosmic neutrinos in the Kamiokande II detector which was led by Prof. Koshiba.
I organise the talk as follows.
Firstly, I will give you an introduction about neutrinos and cosmic neutrino sources including the Sun and supernovae.
Next, I will tell you about the Kamiokande II detector. This will be followed by observation results of supernova and solar neutrinos.
Last is the outlook, how the experiment affected various fields.
Neutrinos are elementary particles which rarely interact with other matter. Since they are leptons without electric charges, they can only interact via weak interaction. The weak interaction, like its name suggests, is… weak. How weak is it? Let’s consider interactions between two protons in nucleus. If we take the strength of electromagnetic interaction as 1, the strength of the weak interaction will be 10^-7, one of ten millions. This makes neutrinos rarely interact. They have even been called the ghost particles.
Today we are interested in two sources of cosmic neutrinos, the Sun and supernovae.
According to the standard solar model, the Sun is energised by chain reactions of nuclear fusions in the core. Some of these reactions produce neutrinos.
This diagram shows the proton-proton chain which dominates in stars the size of the Sun and smaller. In this chain, 3 hydrogens turn into 1 helium. 5 reactions produce neutrinos. The ones that are relevant today are called B-8 neutrinos from the beta decay of boron-8.
Fusions of heavier nuclei can occur in larger stars. The larger the star, the heavier the nuclei. These chain reactions continue until all nuclei in the core become iron. Then, the core will collapse under its own gravity.
This is where a core-collapse supernova happens. The star explodes while its core forms a neutron star.
During a core-collapse supernova, neutrinos are produced. These neutrinos play an important role in igniting the explosion of the supernova.
I show you here two stages in the core-collapse mechanism. On the right diagram, neutrinos are produced from electron capture by protons in the outer core. On the left hand side, when the inner core is cooling down to form proto-neutron star, neutrinos and antineutrinos produced by the pair creation in addition to the electron capture.
In a core-collapse supernova, a star releases more than 99% of its gravitational binding energy as neutrinos.
This energy is enormous.
Here’s a question to give you a sense of scale.
Which would be brighter, in terms of the amount of energy delivered to your retina?
A supernova, seen from as far away as the Sun is from the Earth. or
The detonation of a hydrogen bomb pressed against your eyeball.
The answer is…. a. The supernova is brighter by nine orders of magnitude. And recall that photons carry less than 1% of all energy in the supernova compared with 99% carried by neutrinos.
Although these neutrinos are difficult to detect, the plus side is that they could travel for a very long distance without being disturbed. We can use neutrinos to probe environments which other radiations such as photon cannot penetrate.
For example, shown here are the structure of the Sun. At the centre is the core where the nuclear fusions occur and neutrinos are produced. There are also photons released in the core. However it takes more than a hundred thousands years for these photons to reach the outer edge of radiative zone. Almost all of observed light is from the outer shell called the photosphere.
In the next section, I will tell you how the kamiokande II detector detected these ghost particles.
Originally, the kamiokande experiment led by Prof. Koshiba aimed to search for proton decay, as its name stands for Kamioka Nucleon Decay Experiment. It planed to use the Cherenkov radiation to detect the decay.
I will tell you about the Cherenkov radiation later.
To reduce backgrounds signal, the experiment was located in a mine under a mountain.
After a year without any decay signal, their thought may be like, O.K. let’s just make the bound of the proton lifetime and do something else.
Inspired by Davis’ solar neutrino experiment, Prof. Koshiba upgraded the detector into Kamiokande II aiming to detect solar neutrinos. It was the first Cherenkov detector for neutrinos.
The target detector was a water tank containing 2 ton water. Installed on the inner surface of the tank are newly developed photomultiplier tubes. These covered about 20% of total surface of the fiducial volume.
Outside of the tank is the anticounter composed of water to shield against gamma rays and neutrons, and also photomultiplier tubes for muon veto.
With this configuration, the detector was able to detect neutrinos in real-time with directional data. It had the energy threshold of 8.8 MeV.
When a neutrino enters the detector, it may interact with nuclei or electrons. The product is a charged particle travelling faster than the speed of the light in the water and emitting a cone of light known as Cherenkov radiation, equivalent to a sonic boom. The Cherenkov radiation is then detected as a ring by PMTs. From this ring, we could reconstruct the neutrino arrival time, its direction and energy.
On 24 February 1987 a supernova was discovery. It’s located in Large Magellanic Cloud about 170,000 light-years away. After the discovery, scientists at the Kamiokande experiment searched for a possible neutrino signal from the supernova in measured data.
They found that they detected a neutrino burst on 23 February at 7:35 UTC. It was hours before the first optical indication of the supernova.
This plot shows a time sequence of events in a 45-second interval centred at the burst time. They detected 12 neutrinos from the supernova. The signal was concentrated within the first 2 second.
From the 450-days sample, we can see an enhancement of neutrino flux in the direction of the Sun over the isotropic background. This demonstrates that the detected neutrinos were indeed from the Sun.
According to the standard solar model, spectral of neutrinos from pp chain are like this. Note that with the threshold of 8.8 MeV, the Kamiokande II was able to detected only the B8 neutrinos from the beta decay of boron-8.
The histogram is the prediction by the standard solar model. We can see that the measured solar neutrino flux was lower than the prediction.
Again this energy distribution shows that the detected signal was lower than the prediction by the standard solar model. The ratio of the measured data and the prediction was 0.46. This deficiency was consistent with earlier results from Davis’ experiment.