The course focuses on developing nursing leadership skills and advanced nursing roles through analyzing strengths and limitations as a team member, exploring effective communication strategies, examining strategies to promote healthcare system change, and describing leadership skills needed to deliver high-quality and culturally competent care. Students will analyze case studies, participate in collaborative learning teams, and complete projects on nursing leadership, advanced nursing roles, and ideal interdisciplinary teams to achieve course objectives related to leadership, communication, and quality improvement. Evaluation methods include discussion boards, papers, presentations, and a final grade based on accumulating points from assignments.

1. NUR 514: Nursing Leadership and Advanced Roles |
i10/12/2015
Nursing Leadership and Advanced Roles
Course Description
The purpose of this course is professional role development
related to leadership in advance nursing practice.
Major emphasis of the course will focus on effective
communication as a member of an interprofessional
team; strategies to promote change in the healthcare system; and
leadership skills necessary to deliver high
quality and culturally competent healthcare to positively affect
patient outcomes.
Course Objectives
At the end of the course, the student will be able to:
• Analyze own strengths, limitations, and values as a
member of a team and impact of own advanced
practice role
• Describe scopes of practice and roles of all healthcare
team members and strategies for identifying and
managing overlaps in roles

2. • Articulate initiatives to sustain effective partnerships with
members of nursing and inter-professional
teams
• Explore impact of own communication style on others and
preferences among patients and families,
advanced practice nurses, and other members of the health team
• Examine the impact of authority gradients and their
influence on team functioning on safety and quality of
care
• Identify system barriers and facilitators of effective team
functioning
• Examine strategies to promote change for improving
systems and support team functioning
• Describe nurse leader characteristics necessary to manage
a culturally diverse workforce and the impact
of cultural diversity on team functioning
• Describe the factors that create a just culture and the role
of transformational nurse leaders in creating a
culture of safety
• Examine nurse leadership skills necessary to deliver high-
quality care and strategies for improving health
outcomes including academic/clinical partnerships

3. • Explore nursing’s image in the media and examine
strategies to present a positive image
Topic Outline
1. Impact of advanced practice role
2. Scopes of practice and roles of all health care team members
3. Initiatives to sustain effective partnerships
4. Team functioning on quality of care
5. Strategies to promote change
6. Impact of cultural diversity
7. Nursing’s image in the media
Teaching Strategies
• Assigned Readings
• Case Studies
• Collaborative Learning Teams
• Discussion Boards
• Guest Speakers
• Lecture/Discussion

4. • Student Presentations
• Written Projects
Evaluation Methods
Discussion Board (8 @ 20 points each) 160
Collaborative Ideal Interdisciplinary team paper and
presentation 150
Nursing Leadership and Influence paper 150
Advanced Nursing Roles poster presentation 140
Total 600
ii
NUR 514: Nursing Leadership and Advanced Roles |
iii10/12/2015
Final Grade
The course grade will be determined by summing the number of
points the student receives. Letter grades will
be assigned according to the following point accumulations.
A 549–600 points
A- 537–548 points
B+ 525–536 points

5. B 489–524 points
B- 477–488 points
C+ 447–476 points (passes but on academic probation)
Below this level – course is failed
C 417–446 points
F 416 points and below
Required Textbooks
Publication manual of the American Psychological Association
(6th ed.) (2010). Washington, DC: APA.
DeNisco, S.M. & Barker, A.M. (2013). Advanced practice
nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession
(3rd ed). Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett
Sullivan, E. J. (2013). Becoming influential: A guide for nurses
(2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Classroom Policies
Policies regarding attendance, tardiness, examinations,
promotion, and written assignments are stated in the
School of Nursing Handbook. Students are responsible for
knowing these policies and adhering to them.
Honor Code

6. Truth has been identified by the profession as a value essential
to nursing. To underscore the importance of
truth, honesty, and accountability, students, faculty, and staff in
the Jacksonville University School of Nursing
adhere to the following honor code:
“I do not lie, cheat, steal, or condone those who do.” Egregious
academic misconduct will result in dismissal
from the School of Nursing.
Academic Integrity Misconduct Policy
Students are responsible for reading and adhering to the
Jacksonville University Academic Integrity
Misconduct Policy. This policy can be found in the Jacksonville
University Academic Catalog:
http://www.ju.edu/files/Catalogs/2015-
16_JU_Academic_Catalog.pdf
Disability-Related Information
Any student with a visible or nonvisible disability who requests
“reasonable accommodation” to his or her
condition should provide medical and/or psychological
documentation of the disability to the Student Life
Office and refer to the information in the JU catalog and
Student Online Handbook for additional information

7. regarding student disabilities. A student with a learning
disability should weigh carefully with his/her advisor
the requirements of the nursing program in order to ascertain its
suitability, given the nature of the disability.
iv
NUR 514: Nursing Leadership and Advanced Roles |
v10/12/2015
Discussion Board Participation (8 @ 20 points = 160 Points)
A requirement for the class is to post a scholarly, substantive
response utilizing APA (6th ed.) citations to
each week’s Discussion Board by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. ET
and at least four insightful responses to your
classmates or instructor by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. ET for a
minimum total of five postings each week. The
insightful response must be substantive rather than just an “I
agree” response. Students’ online participation
and completion of assigned web-based activities will be tracked
by the instructor throughout the duration of
the course. Course participation points will be deducted for lack
of online participation. Only postings before
11:59 p.m. ET at the end of the week will earn points. Note:
There are no make-up provisions for a missed

8. discussion.
Prepare for the online classroom by completing all assigned
readings and/or activities. Participate in
discussions including building on what others contribute. Use
assigned readings and other appropriate,
relevant literature, together with personal leadership and
clinical experience in nursing as a basis for
discussion.
Discussion Board Assignments are asynchronous learning
activities which allow students to research and
present pertinent information to the entire class. Each student is
expected to post relevant information
obtained from peer reviewed journals, Internet sources that are
organizations, educational, or governmental
(.org/.edu/.gov). Commercial Internet sources are not
appropriate unless from reputable news organization,
i.e., New York Times, Washington Post, Newsweek, Time
Magazine, etc. Failure to participate or to
participate in a less than meaningful fashion will result in no
points awarded. Students will have points
allocated directly related to quality of participation.
14–20 Points – Posting of relevant researched information on
the specified topic, generating a thoughtful

9. discussion thread and contributing to the discussion at least
three times.
8–13 Points – Posting of relevant researched information on the
specified topic, generating a thoughtful
thread and contributing to discussion at least once.
7 Points – Minimal to no contribution to discussion.
Discussion Board Expectations
Components Exceeding Expectations Average Expectations
Below Expectations
Consistency of Responses • Frequent and
even distribution
throughout the
module
• Constant engagement
in the discussion
• Responds in a timely
fashion
• Demonstrates good
self-initiative

10. • Initiates discussion
topics
• Uneven distribution
throughout the
module
• Makes some
contributions to the
online discussions
but not always
present
• Responds most of the
time to messages
• Infrequently initiates
discussion topics
• Uneven and
infrequent
distribution
throughout the

11. module
• Limited
participation
• Only participates
when prompted by
the instructor
Evidence of
Understanding
• Clear that readings
and course materials
were accessed and
understood
• Issues and knowledge
gained incorporated
well into responses
• Learner shows
excellent reflection
on the course content

12. and into their own
learning
• Some integration
of the content of
readings and other
course materials
• Opinions and ideas
are stated clearly
with occasional lack
of connection to topic
or readings
• Some evidence of
reflection on own
learning
• It is not clear that
readings or course
materials were
understood or used

13. in the learner’s
own knowledge
construction
• Makes irrelevant
remarks which
are unrelated to
the topic being
discussed
Depth of Commentary • Examples of learner
thoroughly identifying
and analyzing
issues, implications
of the topic, and
generating new
issues or concerns for
consideration
• Comments offer new
insights

14. • Some evidence of
learner thoroughly
identifying issues,
offering implications
and generating some
new concerns for
consideration
• Some postings offer
new insights
• Comments
are usually to
simply agree or
disagree with
limited analysis or
synthesis
• No evidence of
insight into own
learning

15. vi
NUR 514: Nursing Leadership and Advanced Roles |
vii10/12/2015
Degree of Engagement • Often presents
reflections that
become central to the
team discussion
• Interacts freely and
encourages others
• Consistently presents
creative reflections on
the topic
• Aware of team needs
• Frequently prompts
further discussion
• Occasionally makes
meaningful reflection

16. of team’s efforts
• Some effort to
become involved in
the team
• Somewhat aware of
the needs of the team
• Sometimes prompts
further discussion
• Not actively
involved in the
online discussion
• Does not feel the
need to belong or
participate in team
activities
• Participation only
after prompting
from the instructor

17. Assignment Guidelines
All written assignments must be typed (double-spaced), have an
appropriate title sheet, and conform to APA
format. References should not be older than five years, except
in cases where the reference is considered a
classic in the particular field. For due dates on all assignments,
please refer to the schedule of classes and
assignments.
Nursing Leadership and Influence Paper (150 Points)
This is an individually written formal paper about nursing
leadership and influence. This paper is expected to
be five to seven pages in length, excluding title page and
reference list. APA formatting is required.
Refer to Sullivan’s Becoming Influential as well as Chapter 27
of DeNisco.
Choose a concept presented in Sullivan (Power, Image,
Communication, Politics, Networking, Setting Goals
and Negotiation). Describe the concept and why you view it as
important to nursing influence. Review the
literature on your chosen concept and note your findings.
Describe how you, as an Advanced Practice nurse,
will develop and utilize this concept in your professional

18. practice to influence health care and advocate for
patients. Include in your discussion your goals for the
immediate future once you have completed your MSN
degree.
Nursing Leadership and Influence Points possible
Points
earned
Overview of Nursing Leadership Concept chosen 25
Review of Literature of this concept (a minimum of 8 peer-
reviewed
articles reviewed within five years of publication)
50
Influencing Health Care and Advocating for Patients 25
Future Goals in Advanced Nursing Practice 25
APA/Grammar 25
Total points 150
Advanced Nursing Role Leadership Presentation (140 points)
This is an individual assignment and consists of a poster
presentation.
Select a case scenario that occurred in your nursing practice.
The scenario may involve a direct clinical or an

19. indirect systems (administrative) situation. Explain the case,
including what resolution did or did not occur.
Perform a literature review of the subject and document your
findings. Address the issue from a cultural,
quality and safety, and advanced nursing practice role
perspective. Include information on the legal and
ethical implications of the issue.
viii
NUR 514: Nursing Leadership and Advanced Roles |
ix10/12/2015
Students will post their presentation and direct a discussion
about the issue and their findings. Each student
is expected to pose questions regarding the issue to the class.
Additionally they are expected to address all
questions or comments that are directed to their poster.
Please refer to http://www.makesigns.com/ to download a free
template for your poster.
Advanced Nursing Role Presentation Points possible Points
awarded
Presentation of case study 25
Literature Review of case

20. (Six to eight peer-reviewed articles published within five years)
• Cultural perspective
• Quality and safety perspective
• Leadership perspective
• Legal perspective
• Ethical perspective
50
Discussion of case to classmates 40
Appearance of poster – clarity, formatting, grammar, spelling
25
Total points 140
Collaborative Ideal Interdisciplinary Team Paper and
Presentation (150 points)
This is a group assignment and involves both a written paper
and a PowerPoint presentation. Chose a nursing
issue that impacts your practice. The nursing issue may involve
a structure, process or outcome. Examples
might include an increased number of patient falls, long wait
times in the Emergency Department, high
staff turnover, poor medication compliance in an outpatient
setting. Your team is in charge of establishing a

21. committee to address this issue. Establish membership of your
committee, including which disciplines should
be represented and what individual responsibilities are. Provide
goals and objectives for your committee.
Provide a timeline for expected resolution of the issue and
dissolution of committee. Provide guidelines for
communication among committee members, including resolution
of conflict. Describe how you will implement
your solution to the issue addressed and measure the
effectiveness of your model. Students are expected to
interview nursing and other healthcare leaders at their facility
to help develop their committee. They are also
expected to attend interdisciplinary meetings to gain insight on
the workings of teams and apply what they
learned to their ideal team. Refer to chapter 30 of De Nisco
Student groups will submit one 8–10 page paper for their group.
Additionally students will develop a 15–20
slide PowerPoint presentation about their Team and present to
classmates. Students are expected to lead the
discussion about their ideal team and the issue it is working to
solve.
Collaborative Ideal Interdisciplinary Team and Presentation
Points possible Points awarded

22. Discussion of chosen nursing issue-why it was chosen and
significance to nursing practice
25
Development of Team
• Membership
• Duties & responsibilities of team members
• Committee goals and objectives
• Timeline
• Communication guidelines
• Plans for implementation of solution
• Plans for measuring outcome and success of solution
50
APA/Grammar 25
PowerPoint presentation – clarity, organization, grammar 25
Leading class discussion 25
Total points 150
x
Points: 85

23. Assignment 2: Business Case
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
Meets Minimum Expectations
60-69% D
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Examine measurable organizational value (MOV). Identify
areas of impact, the desired values, and a time frame for
achievement.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or incompletely examined measurable
organizational value (MOV). Did not submit or incompletely
identified areas of impact, the desired values, and a time frame
for achievement.
Insufficiently examined measurable organizational value
(MOV). Insufficiently identified areas of impact, the desired
values, and a time frame for achievement.
Partially examined measurable organizational value (MOV).
Partially identified areas of impact, the desired values, and a
time frame for achievement.
Satisfactorily examined measurable organizational value
(MOV). Satisfactorily identified areas of impact, the desired
values, and a time frame for achievement.
Thoroughly examined measurable organizational value (MOV).
Thoroughly identified areas of impact, the desired values, and a
time frame for achievement.

24. 2. Suggest at least two (2) alternatives to developing a mobile
application. Justify the consideration of such alternatives.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or incompletelysuggested at least two (2)
alternatives to developing a mobile application. Did not submit
or incompletelyjustified the consideration of such alternatives.
Insufficiently suggested at least two (2) alternatives to
developing a mobile application. Insufficiently justified the
consideration of such alternatives.
Partially suggested at least two (2) alternatives to developing a
mobile application. Partially justified the consideration of such
alternatives.
Satisfactorily suggested at least two (2) alternatives to
developing a mobile application. Satisfactorily justified the
consideration of such alternatives.
Thoroughly suggested at least two (2) alternatives to developing
a mobile application. Thoroughly justified the consideration of
such alternatives.
3. Analyze the feasibility of developing the mobile application
and your suggested alternatives.
Weight:10%
Did not submit or incompletelyanalyzed the feasibility of
developing the mobile application and your suggested
alternatives.
Insufficiently analyzed the feasibility of developing the mobile
application and your suggested alternatives.
Partially analyzed the feasibility of developing the mobile
application and your suggested alternatives.
Satisfactorily analyzed the feasibility of developing the mobile
application and your suggested alternatives.
Thoroughly analyzed the feasibility of developing the mobile
application and your suggested alternatives.
4. Define the cost of ownership of the mobile application.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or incompletely defined the cost of ownership of
the mobile application.

25. Insufficiently defined the cost of ownership of the mobile
application.
Partially defined the cost of ownership of the mobile
application.
Satisfactorily defined the cost of ownership of the mobile
application.
Thoroughly defined the cost of ownership of the mobile
application.
5. Define the benefits of ownership of the mobile application.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or incompletelydefined the benefits of
ownership of the mobile application.
Insufficiently defined the benefits of ownership of the mobile
application.
Partially defined the benefits of ownership of the mobile
application.
Satisfactorily defined the benefits of ownership of the mobile
application.
Thoroughly defined the benefits of ownership of the mobile
application.
6. Predict the return on investment (ROI) of the mobile
application and your suggested alternatives.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or incompletelypredicted the return on
investment (ROI) of the mobile application and your suggested
alternatives.
Insufficiently predicted the return on investment (ROI) of the
mobile application and your suggested alternatives.
Partially predicted the return on investment (ROI) of the mobile
application and your suggested alternatives.
Satisfactorily predicted the return on investment (ROI) of the
mobile application and your suggested alternatives.
Thoroughly predicted the return on investment (ROI) of the
mobile application and your suggested alternatives.
7. Identify risks associated with developing the mobile
application.

26. Weight: 10%
Did not submit or incompletelyidentify risks associated with
developing the mobile application.
Insufficientlyidentified risks associated with developing the
mobile application.
Partially identified risks associated with developing the mobile
application.
Satisfactorily identified risks associated with developing the
mobile application.
Thoroughly identified risks associated with developing the
mobile application.
8. Propose a final recommendation of whether or not the
organization should develop the mobile application or one of
your alternatives.
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletelyproposed a final recommendation
of whether or not the organization should develop the mobile
application or one of your alternatives.
Insufficientlyproposed a final recommendation of whether or
not the organization should develop the mobile application or
one of your alternatives.
Partiallyproposed a final recommendation of whether or not the
organization should develop the mobile application or one of
your alternatives.
Satisfactorilyproposed a final recommendation of whether or
not the organization should develop the mobile application or
one of your alternatives.
Thoroughlyproposed a final recommendation of whether or not
the organization should develop the mobile application or one
of your alternatives.
9. 1 reference
Weight: 5%
No references provided
Does not meet the required number of references; all references
poor quality choices.
Does not meet the required number of references; some

27. references poor quality choices.
Meets number of required references; all references high quality
choices.
Exceeds number of required references; all references high
quality choices.
10. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%
More than 8 errors present
7-8 errors present
5-6 errors present
3-4 errors present
0-2 errors present
Points: 85
Assignment 2: Business Case
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
Meets Minimum
Expectations
60
-
69% D
Fair

28. 70
-
79% C
Proficient
80
-
89% B
Exemplary
90
-
100% A
1. Examine
measurable
organizational
value (MOV).
Identify areas of
impact, the
desired values,
and a time
frame for
achievement.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or
incompletely examined

29. measurable
organizational value
(MOV). Did not submit
or incompletely
iden
tified areas of
impact, the desired
values, and a time
frame for
achievement.
Insufficiently
examined
measurable
organizational value
(MOV). Insufficiently
identified areas of
impact, the desired
values, and a time
frame for
achievement.
Partially
examined
measurable
organizational
value
(MOV).
Partially
identified areas
of impact, the
desired values,
and a time frame
for achievement.

30. Satisfactorily
examined measurable
organizational value
(MOV). Satisfactorily
identified areas of
impact, the desired
value
s, and a time
frame for
achievement.
Thoroughly
examined
measurable
organizational value
(MOV).
Thoroughly
identified areas of
impact, the desired
values, and a time
frame for
achievement.
2. Suggest at
least two (2)
alternatives to
developing a
mobile
a
pplication.
Justify the
consideration of
such
alternatives.

31. Weight: 10%
Did not submit or
incompletelysuggested
at least two (2)
alternatives to
developing a mobile
application. Did not
submit or
incompletelyjustified
the consideration of
such alternatives
.
Insufficiently
suggested at least
two (2) alternatives to
developing a mobile
application.
Insufficiently justified
the consideration of
such alternatives.
Partially
suggested at
least two (2)
alternatives to
developing a
mobile
application.
Partially ju
stified
the consideration
of such
alternatives.

32. Satisfactorily
suggested at least
two (2) alternatives to
developing a mobile
application.
Satisfactorily justified
the consideration of
such alternatives.
Thoroughly
suggested at least
two (2) alternatives
t
o developing a
mobile application.
Thoroughly justified
the consideration of
such alternatives.
3. Analyze the
feasibility of
developing the
mobile
application and
your suggested
alternatives.
Weight:10%
Did not submit or
incompletelyanalyzed
the feasibil
ity of
developing the mobile
application and your

33. suggested
alternatives.
Insufficiently
analyzed the
feasibility of
developing the
mobile application
and your suggested
alternatives.
Partially
analyzed the
feasibility of
developing the
mobile
application and
your suggested
alternatives.
Satisfactorily
analyzed the
feasibility of
developing the mobile
application and your
suggested
alternatives.
Thoroughly
analyzed the
feasibility of
de
veloping the
mobile application
and your suggested
alternatives.

34. 4. Define the
cost of
ownership of the
mobile
application.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or
incompletely defined
the cost of ownership
of the mobile
application.
Insufficiently defined
the cost
of ownership
of the mobile
application.
Partially defined
the cost of
ownership of the
mobile
application.
Satisfactorily defined
the cost of ownership
of the mobile
application.
Thoroughly defined
the cost of
ownership of the

35. mobile application.
5. Define the
benefits of
ownership of the
mobile
application.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or
incompletelydefined
the benefits of
ownership of the
mobile application.
Insufficiently defined
the benefits of
ownership of the
mobile application.
Partially defi
ned
the benefits of
ownership of the
mobile
application.
Satisfactorily defined
the benefits of
ownership of the
mobile application.
Thoroughly defined
the benefits of
ownership of the

36. mobile application.
6. Predict the
return on
investment
(ROI) of the
m
obile
application and
Did not submit or
incompletelypredicted
the return on
investment (ROI) of
the mobile application
Insufficiently
predicted the return
on investment (ROI)
of the
mobile
application and your
Partially
predicted the
return on
investment (ROI)
of the mobile
application and
Satisfactorily
predicted the return
on investment (ROI)
of the mobile
application and your
Thoroughly
predicted the return
on investment (ROI)
of the mobile
application and your

37. Points: 85 Assignment 2: Business Case
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
Meets Minimum
Expectations
60-69% D
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Examine
measurable
organizational
value (MOV).
Identify areas of
impact, the
desired values,
and a time
frame for
achievement.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or
incompletely examined
measurable
organizational value
(MOV). Did not submit
or incompletely
identified areas of
impact, the desired

38. values, and a time
frame for
achievement.
Insufficiently
examined
measurable
organizational value
(MOV). Insufficiently
identified areas of
impact, the desired
values, and a time
frame for
achievement.
Partially
examined
measurable
organizational
value
(MOV). Partially
identified areas
of impact, the
desired values,
and a time frame
for achievement.
Satisfactorily
examined measurable
organizational value
(MOV). Satisfactorily
identified areas of
impact, the desired
values, and a time
frame for
achievement.
Thoroughly
examined
measurable

39. organizational value
(MOV). Thoroughly
identified areas of
impact, the desired
values, and a time
frame for
achievement.
2. Suggest at
least two (2)
alternatives to
developing a
mobile
application.
Justify the
consideration of
such
alternatives.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or
incompletelysuggested
at least two (2)
alternatives to
developing a mobile
application. Did not
submit or
incompletelyjustified
the consideration of
such alternatives.
Insufficiently
suggested at least
two (2) alternatives to
developing a mobile
application.
Insufficiently justified
the consideration of
such alternatives.

40. Partially
suggested at
least two (2)
alternatives to
developing a
mobile
application.
Partially justified
the consideration
of such
alternatives.
Satisfactorily
suggested at least
two (2) alternatives to
developing a mobile
application.
Satisfactorily justified
the consideration of
such alternatives.
Thoroughly
suggested at least
two (2) alternatives
to developing a
mobile application.
Thoroughly justified
the consideration of
such alternatives.
3. Analyze the
feasibility of
developing the
mobile
application and
your suggested
alternatives.
Weight:10%
Did not submit or

41. incompletelyanalyzed
the feasibility of
developing the mobile
application and your
suggested
alternatives.
Insufficiently
analyzed the
feasibility of
developing the
mobile application
and your suggested
alternatives.
Partially
analyzed the
feasibility of
developing the
mobile
application and
your suggested
alternatives.
Satisfactorily
analyzed the
feasibility of
developing the mobile
application and your
suggested
alternatives.
Thoroughly
analyzed the
feasibility of
developing the
mobile application
and your suggested
alternatives.
4. Define the

42. cost of
ownership of the
mobile
application.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or
incompletely defined
the cost of ownership
of the mobile
application.
Insufficiently defined
the cost of ownership
of the mobile
application.
Partially defined
the cost of
ownership of the
mobile
application.
Satisfactorily defined
the cost of ownership
of the mobile
application.
Thoroughly defined
the cost of
ownership of the
mobile application.
5. Define the
benefits of
ownership of the
mobile
application.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or
incompletelydefined
the benefits of

43. ownership of the
mobile application.
Insufficiently defined
the benefits of
ownership of the
mobile application.
Partially defined
the benefits of
ownership of the
mobile
application.
Satisfactorily defined
the benefits of
ownership of the
mobile application.
Thoroughly defined
the benefits of
ownership of the
mobile application.
6. Predict the
return on
investment
(ROI) of the
mobile
application and
Did not submit or
incompletelypredicted
the return on
investment (ROI) of
the mobile application
Insufficiently
predicted the return
on investment (ROI)
of the mobile
application and your
Partially

44. predicted the
return on
investment (ROI)
of the mobile
application and
Satisfactorily
predicted the return
on investment (ROI)
of the mobile
application and your
Thoroughly
predicted the return
on investment (ROI)
of the mobile
application and your