ll

1. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2969657/Stoke-Mandeville-ignored-complaints-fiend-
Savile-Senior-staff-knew-young-victims-suffering-abuse-says-report.html
The first news report that I shall be analysing will be a case that has been reported recently that
former 80s TV presenter Jimmy Savile has been reported for abusing patients at Stoke Mandeville
Hospital .
This is a public interest news that would be played on national news programs . The reason for this is
because he was a British presenter that was played nationally to the country . So this story would
only interested people in Briton people from other countries would not know who he is so the story
would not appeal to them . It is a public interests because this is a story that has been going on for a
while with which is in the people agenda with this stories regarding Jimmy Savile being played on the
news a lot people have become more interested in the stories and wondering how they had not
been caught while he was still alive . Because the accused is not still alive the immediately of this
news report is not urgent .
With writing this story the reporter must make sure that they follow the rules and regulations of
news reporting . For example the involving of miners . This story conations a girl who was abused by
him at the age 8 . Although she will be older now at the time when this had occurred she was a
minor which means that they are unable to give any details about her. This means that they are not
able to give any valuable information away about her this would be things like name or the place
where she lives etc. . They also do this to not tarnishes the name of the victim . If this was done then
the news company would be infringement of contempt of court this may mean that they would be
fined of get some sort of prison sentence .
This story may have some sort of available audio but obviously not from the accused ,but there may
be audio from ether a policemen , a judge or a family member for the victim . By doing this it will
give the views more of a incite of the story from the point of view of the people there and what they
feel about it .
There are many different follow up story’s that may follow this story . One may be the new
foundation of operation Utree and how well it is working to stop this from happening again . There
may also be something like how many other celebrities have got away with abusing minors with
having case like ken Barlow and Fred the weather man . There may also be a story about why they
are getting away with it at the time and what more that we can do in order to stop it from ever
happening again .
The next story that I am going to have a look at and analyse Is a story about celebrity privacy and the
news of the word scandal of them hacking into celebrity’s phones to get information out of them
which they then post this means that there personal messages was now in the hands on the public
so the controversy is are celebrity’s entitled privacy if they put themselves in the public image.
This would be a public interests news story berceuse it is something that is something that interests
the public since a lot of the public read articles about celebrity’s personal life .This means that it is
public interests since it is something that somewhat effects the public . This will be a national news
report because it is something that will affect the whole country but the news of the world is a

2. British news paper so it will not be an international story . Although now this news story is not that
important since the news of the world is shut down . But at the time the immediacy because there
was a thing going round at who was hacked with people wondering if there privet information has
been given away .
For this story the news report needed to make sure that they are not It contempt of court . For
example if the news report said that a certain person was behind the hacking then they would be
accused of making libel which could end up with them being in court and possibly ending with a
prison sentence from it . They also need to make sure that they do not explain in detail about the
information that was stolen because this also could be libel for putting the information into the
public’s hands.
This will probably have available audio form several people. The first would be the people who was
hacked and what they thought about what was happening to them this will give the public interests
to how the victims feel. They may also ask a police officer to speak to give the public a sense of the
punishment that the accusers would be facing.
The follow up angles for this may be things like who was hacked and why they was hacked. They may
also follow up with the controversy if celebrity’s deserve to have privacy since they have put
themselves in the public image. And also do people like terrorist allowed privacy if they plan of
committing some sort of crime