SB 287 proposes revisions to Nevada's public records law. It clarifies that the public has the right to promptly inspect, copy, or receive copies of public records, including in electronic format. It defines "public record" and requires records to be provided in the format requested. The bill establishes requirements for responding to record requests and allows requesters to recover costs and fees if denied access due to unreasonable delay or excessive fees. It also provides for civil penalties for noncompliance.
Sponsors: Louis P. Hill
CoSponsors:
Subject: Uniform Probate Code; Probate & Uniform Law Updates: Draft a measure to enact the Uniform Probate Code as drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, amending all relevant sections of the Virgin Islands Code Title 15 and all other sections of the code in order to revise and improve probate court procedures, processing, forms, court filings, and all matters related to probate
America's Founding Documents | Constitution of the United States of America I...with Wind
Interpretations and analysis of The United States Constitution made by The Roberts Court (Supreme Court), and governed by Congress, House of Representatives and the 45th Office of the United States of America.
Year: Two Thousand and Eighteen AD.
Commander in Chief: Donald J Trump (Inaugurate).
Vice President of the United States: Mike Pence.
62nd Speaker of the House of Representatives: Paul Ryan.
Republican Chief Deputy Whip: Patrick McHenry (Majority).
Senior Chief Deputy Whip: John Lewis.
“The task of a judge is not to make the law. It is to apply the law.”
~ U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor
“Independence means you decide according to the law and the facts.”
~ U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer
Sponsors: Louis P. Hill
CoSponsors:
Subject: Uniform Probate Code; Probate & Uniform Law Updates: Draft a measure to enact the Uniform Probate Code as drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, amending all relevant sections of the Virgin Islands Code Title 15 and all other sections of the code in order to revise and improve probate court procedures, processing, forms, court filings, and all matters related to probate
America's Founding Documents | Constitution of the United States of America I...with Wind
Interpretations and analysis of The United States Constitution made by The Roberts Court (Supreme Court), and governed by Congress, House of Representatives and the 45th Office of the United States of America.
Year: Two Thousand and Eighteen AD.
Commander in Chief: Donald J Trump (Inaugurate).
Vice President of the United States: Mike Pence.
62nd Speaker of the House of Representatives: Paul Ryan.
Republican Chief Deputy Whip: Patrick McHenry (Majority).
Senior Chief Deputy Whip: John Lewis.
“The task of a judge is not to make the law. It is to apply the law.”
~ U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor
“Independence means you decide according to the law and the facts.”
~ U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer
NY AG Schneiderman's Petition of FERC to Investigate the Constitution Pipelin...Marcellus Drilling News
A sham petition by New York's power-mad Attorney General, Eric Schneiderman, requesting that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission investigate the Constitution Pipeline for cutting down a few trees along the pipeline's proposed path (a path approved by FERC) before New York granted its own permission. It is a move by Scheiderman to provide political cover for an embattled and corrupt governor, Andrew Cuomo, and an attempt to smear the good name Williams and the Constitution Pipeline project.
Order granting-motions-to-enjoin-9-a-of-exec-o (1)Edward Premo
In 1992, I had the honor of representing Allegany County before the United States Supreme Court in New York, et al. v. United States, 505 US 144 (1992). District Court Judge Orrick relies on the Supreme Court’s 10th Amendments analysis from that decision for his Order (attached) enjoining portions of the Presidential Executive Order on Sanctuary Cities.
A still-incomplete bill to rewire the U.S. judicial system from scratch, making it consistent with the constitutional right to trial by jury rather than dependent upon judges, removing the travesty of plea bargaining, and instituting other reforms.
SB 270 adds to the exemption for retired law enforcement carry privileges to include officers who are citizens of this state and have an aggregate of ten years in law enforcement with arrest powers, separated from service in good standing, and have an identification card for retired law enforcement. The bill clarifies definitions for "commercial service airport" and "major airline carrier" as it applies to those who carry a weapon into a commercial airport. Finally, the legislation provides immunity from civil liability from injuries caused by the failure of a person to use a firearm properly or lawfully to those instructors who provide safety training.
Under this legislation an employee leaving the service of the board under honorable conditions who has accumulated 20 years or more of service with board, or 20 or more years of combined service as a parole officer, a probation officer or supervisor with the Department of Corrections, or a community supervision officer with the department may retain his or her board issued weapon and badge. When a parole officer leaves the employment of the board as a result of disability arising in the line of duty, he is entitled as part of his compensation to retain his or weapon and badge in accordance with the board's rules and regulations. Should a parole officer be killed in the line of duty his board issued badge is eligible to be given to a surviving family member. The application fee for an adult offender applying to transfer his or her supervision from Georgia to any other state or territory is increased from $25.00 to $100.00.
The bill includes several other provisions which clean up the firearms Code in Title 16. The bill provides for new Georgia residents who have a carry license issued by a state which recognizes Georgia licenses to have 90 days in order to get their Georgia license. The bill states that persons who have a valid hunting or fishing license are not required to have on their person a carry license when they are engaged in legal hunting, fishing, or sport shooting on recreational or wildlife management areas owned by the state.
This legislation allows a person who leaves a place of worship upon notification that firearms are prohibited to avoid being cited as violating the Code. The bill also allows probate judges receiving applications for permits, to issue printed information on firearms safety courses. The bill also requires the Department of Natural Resources to provide on their principal website, information on hunter education and classes in this state that render gun safety instruction.
Indiana Governor Eric Holcomb files an appeal in a case where a Marion County Judge ruled state lawmakers do have the ability to call themselves into special session.
ConCourt Judgement on Shaun Abrahams appointment SABC News
judgement handed out this morning ruling that NPA head, Shaun Abrahams must vacate office and that Mxolisi Nxasana must pay back his golden handshake proceeds.
Legal process that allows the federal government to take “ill gotten gains” from the defendant.
Inserted into numerous federal statutes and is mandatory for over 200 federal crimes.
Gross Proceeds at time of commission of the offense may be forfeitable.
Process begins immediately after sentencing.
Proceeds go to government, not victim.
Fraud in government-funded programs can occur anywhere – – Medicare fraud, defense contracting fraud, GSA Schedules and other types of government contracting fraud. When an individual sues on behalf of the United States to recover fraudulently obtained funds, this is known as qui tam whistleblower litigation.
NY AG Schneiderman's Petition of FERC to Investigate the Constitution Pipelin...Marcellus Drilling News
A sham petition by New York's power-mad Attorney General, Eric Schneiderman, requesting that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission investigate the Constitution Pipeline for cutting down a few trees along the pipeline's proposed path (a path approved by FERC) before New York granted its own permission. It is a move by Scheiderman to provide political cover for an embattled and corrupt governor, Andrew Cuomo, and an attempt to smear the good name Williams and the Constitution Pipeline project.
Order granting-motions-to-enjoin-9-a-of-exec-o (1)Edward Premo
In 1992, I had the honor of representing Allegany County before the United States Supreme Court in New York, et al. v. United States, 505 US 144 (1992). District Court Judge Orrick relies on the Supreme Court’s 10th Amendments analysis from that decision for his Order (attached) enjoining portions of the Presidential Executive Order on Sanctuary Cities.
A still-incomplete bill to rewire the U.S. judicial system from scratch, making it consistent with the constitutional right to trial by jury rather than dependent upon judges, removing the travesty of plea bargaining, and instituting other reforms.
SB 270 adds to the exemption for retired law enforcement carry privileges to include officers who are citizens of this state and have an aggregate of ten years in law enforcement with arrest powers, separated from service in good standing, and have an identification card for retired law enforcement. The bill clarifies definitions for "commercial service airport" and "major airline carrier" as it applies to those who carry a weapon into a commercial airport. Finally, the legislation provides immunity from civil liability from injuries caused by the failure of a person to use a firearm properly or lawfully to those instructors who provide safety training.
Under this legislation an employee leaving the service of the board under honorable conditions who has accumulated 20 years or more of service with board, or 20 or more years of combined service as a parole officer, a probation officer or supervisor with the Department of Corrections, or a community supervision officer with the department may retain his or her board issued weapon and badge. When a parole officer leaves the employment of the board as a result of disability arising in the line of duty, he is entitled as part of his compensation to retain his or weapon and badge in accordance with the board's rules and regulations. Should a parole officer be killed in the line of duty his board issued badge is eligible to be given to a surviving family member. The application fee for an adult offender applying to transfer his or her supervision from Georgia to any other state or territory is increased from $25.00 to $100.00.
The bill includes several other provisions which clean up the firearms Code in Title 16. The bill provides for new Georgia residents who have a carry license issued by a state which recognizes Georgia licenses to have 90 days in order to get their Georgia license. The bill states that persons who have a valid hunting or fishing license are not required to have on their person a carry license when they are engaged in legal hunting, fishing, or sport shooting on recreational or wildlife management areas owned by the state.
This legislation allows a person who leaves a place of worship upon notification that firearms are prohibited to avoid being cited as violating the Code. The bill also allows probate judges receiving applications for permits, to issue printed information on firearms safety courses. The bill also requires the Department of Natural Resources to provide on their principal website, information on hunter education and classes in this state that render gun safety instruction.
Indiana Governor Eric Holcomb files an appeal in a case where a Marion County Judge ruled state lawmakers do have the ability to call themselves into special session.
ConCourt Judgement on Shaun Abrahams appointment SABC News
judgement handed out this morning ruling that NPA head, Shaun Abrahams must vacate office and that Mxolisi Nxasana must pay back his golden handshake proceeds.
Legal process that allows the federal government to take “ill gotten gains” from the defendant.
Inserted into numerous federal statutes and is mandatory for over 200 federal crimes.
Gross Proceeds at time of commission of the offense may be forfeitable.
Process begins immediately after sentencing.
Proceeds go to government, not victim.
Fraud in government-funded programs can occur anywhere – – Medicare fraud, defense contracting fraud, GSA Schedules and other types of government contracting fraud. When an individual sues on behalf of the United States to recover fraudulently obtained funds, this is known as qui tam whistleblower litigation.
Sample opposition to motion for reconsideration in CaliforniaLegalDocsPro
This sample motion for reconsideration in California is made on the grounds that the motion does not comply with Code of Civil Procedure section 1008(a) as it is not timely and no new or different facts, circumstances or law are provided that would support granting reconsideration. The sample on which this preview is based includes brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory, sample declaration and proof of service by mail.
Duites and Responsibilities of Public Information Officer under the Right To ...ParthSagdeo2
Salient features of the RTI act and PIOs are officers designated by the public authorities in all administrative units or offices under it to provide information to the citizens requesting information under the Act. Any officer, whose assistance has been sought by the PIO for the proper discharge of his or her duties, shall render all assistance and for contraventions of the provisions of this Act, such other officer shall be treated as a PIO.
Freedom of Information - Implementation and Statutory Provisions of the Act (...EquiGov Institute
This Presentation seeks to highlight the implementation of the Freedom of Information Act in Trinidad and Tobago, Outline the Statutory Provisions that exist and note some of the challenges faced in implementing and operation the Act.
The beedi and cigar workers (conditions of employment) amendment act, 1993UllalNews
ಬೀಡಿ ಉಧ್ಯಮವನ್ನೇ ನಂಬಿರುವ ಸಂಸಾರಗಳು ಬೀದಿ ಪಾಲಾಗುವ ಸಾಧ್ಯತೆ ಇದೆ. ಆದಷ್ಟು ಬೇಗ ಸರಕಾರಕ್ಕೆ ಹತ್ತಿರ ಇರುವ ಜನರ ಸೇವಕ ಶಾಸನ ಸಭೆಗೆ ಆಯ್ಕೆ ಆದ ಜನಪ್ರತಿನಿದಿಗಳು ಕೂಡಲೇ ಸ್ಪಂದಿಸಬೇಕಾಗಿದೆ
Sparks Fire Dept. investigative report into Timothy Egan dropping a senior ci...This Is Reno
This report by Christopher Darcy of the Fairfax Consulting Group found Sparks Firefighter Timothy Egan instigated an altercation with a senior citizen, lied about it and violated department policies and state laws. Egan claimed he was attacked by Maureen Hvegholm, then 84, in December of 2022 when Hvegholm was feeding cats in an alleyway in Sparks, Nevada.
“Egan was responsible for creating the physical altercation between himself and Hvegholm,” Darcy wrote. “Egan initiated contact by approaching Hvegholm, attempting to take and throw away items she believed were hers. Egan used what officers described as disproportional force by throwing Hvegholm to the ground, causing her to land face first and injuring her forehead.”
Reno Council Member's Petition lawsuit against the City of RenoThis Is Reno
Reno City Council member Jenny Brekhus last month sued the city after a 2,000-page report was released that implicated her as a toxic force at City Hall. Brekhus requested an investigation into the city, particularly City Manager Doug Thornley and the allegations she made against him.
However, the investigator instead determined that Brekhus was the source of hostility, and the investigator could not substantiate her allegations.
“The greater weight of the credible evidence indicates that Councilmember Brekhus has a habit of speaking to individuals in a manner that demeans and belittles them,” Dalton Green, with the Ogletree Deakins law firm, wrote. “In a passive aggressive manner, she calls their competence and, often, their integrity, into question – frequently in the presence of others – such that many are afraid to deal with her.”
In response to the report, Brekhus sued the city in December.
Washoe County Commissioner Jeanne Herman floats new resolution to overhaul el...This Is Reno
Washoe County Commissioner Jeanne Herman renewed her efforts to change how elections are run in Washoe County this week. According to Washoe County spokesperson Bethany Drysdale, her proposal is also impossible to implement and potentially illegal. The proposal has yet to be reviewed by Washoe County’s District Attorney or the Secretary of State’s office.
Sheriff’s deputy, county investigator sue Reno Police Department, former chiefThis Is Reno
A Washoe County Sheriff’s deputy and an investigator with the district attorney’s office last week filed a civil rights lawsuit against the Reno Police Department and former Police Chief Jason Soto. Also named in the litigation is a retired RPD Sergeant, Paul Sifre, who is alleged to have sexually harassed the two plaintiffs.
Apryl McElroy, a detective with the Washoe County Sheriff’s Office, and Jessica Troup, an investigator with the Washoe County District Attorney’s office (previously with University Police Services), both allege Sifre made sexually explicit comments to them while at a conference in Las Vegas. Rather than addressing the issue—and what they called longstanding problematic behavior by Sifre—the plaintiffs allege he received a lucrative disability retirement instead.
Dennis Carry Affidavit in Support of Warrant This Is Reno
Former Washoe County Sheriff’s Sergeant Dennis Carry is facing seven felony charges, including bigamy – being married to two different people at the same time.
Carry is also accused of burglary, forgery, surreptitious intrusion of privacy, giving false evidence and perjury.
The case goes back to 2019 when Reno police started investigating Carry. He is alleged to have broken into the Washoe County courthouse to modify married records in an attempt to cover up his dual marriages.
The Reno Police Department and City of Reno said this document is 100% confidential, and Washoe County District Court Judge Kathleen Drakulich agreed, even though This Is Reno obtained the unreacted affidavit from Reno Justice Court. The Nevada Supreme Court June 2023 ordered Drakulich to reconsider her decision.
Reno Council member Devon Reese's ethics violationsThis Is Reno
Reno City Council member Devon Reese must comply with a handful of orders handed down by the Nevada Ethics Commission this month after cause was found in a complaint filed last year alleging he violated a handful of state ethics laws.
The complaint, filed in September 2022, alleges Reese did not disclose business relationships with several employee union groups, and he did not recuse himself from contract negotiations with those groups or votes to approve those contracts.
Reese works as an attorney for the Hutchison and Steffen law firm.
The commission’s review panel determined that two of the five violations noted in the complaint were valid.
As a result, Reese has to participate in ethics training, develop a process to disclose and abstain from council activities related to his office’s clients, and submit Reno City Council meeting minutes referencing issues or clients related to the law firm for the next two years.
If Reese doesn’t meet these requirements, or has another ethics violation within the next two years, the commission will repeal the deferral agreement and may pursue additional action.
Vegas physician, America's Frontline Doctors sued after Reno man died from ta...This Is Reno
The estate of Jeremy Parker last week sued the anti-vaccination, right-wing group America's Frontline Doctors for alleged wrongful death. Dr. Medina Culver, an osteopathic physician and Instagram influencer based in Henderson, Nevada, is also named in the case. The lawsuit alleges negligence by the group and Culver for the death of Parker last year.
"Based on information provided by America's Frontline Doctors, Mr. Parker became convinced, along with several of his co-workers, that hydroxychloroquine was an effective treatment for COVID-19," the suit alleges. "On or about August 26, 2021, Mr. Parker had a telemedicine visit with Dr. Culver, at which time Dr. Culver prescribed Mr. Parker with hydroxychloroquine and/or ivermectin for COVID-19 treatment or 'preventative therapy.' Dr. Culver never performed a physical examination of Mr. Parker."
According to the suit, Parker developed cold-like symptoms in late January of 2022. His body was found Feb. 3, 2022. The Washoe County coroner listed Parker's cause of death as "sudden in the setting of therapeutic use of hydroxychloroquine."
City of Reno Police Chief Community SurveyThis Is Reno
Low staffing levels and political agendas are two problems within the Reno Police Department. That’s according to concerns identified by community members and RPD employees in two recent surveys conducted as part of a search for the department’s new chief.
The surveys were developed and analyzed by Ralph Andersen, an executive search firm tasked with helping to replace Chief Jason Soto, who is set to retire in January 2023.
The internal department survey included responses from 128 of RPD’s staff – officers, command staff and civilians. It revealed that employees have mixed feelings about the department, with some citing low morale, burnout and staffing shortages.
Viral video of Reno-area Sikhs partying with sex workers in Costa Rica subjec...This Is Reno
Multiple phones were recording video of members of Reno’s Sikh community frolicking in May with sex workers in Costa Rica. But only one person is being sued for sharing video of plaintiffs Ranbir Chhina, Navdeep Singh, Kewal Singh, Opinder Dhillon and Amandeep Singh engaging in “adult entertainment.”
Nic Palmer of the Laub & Laub law firm recently filed a lawsuit against Parminder Walia for sharing videos of the group partying with prostitutes in the Central American country. The plaintiffs are claiming an intrusion of privacy.
“The Plaintiffs are business owners and belong to the Sikh Community, which is a conservative religion,” Palmer wrote. “The Plaintiff [sic] have suffered social and financial consequences due to the Defendants actions of posting the videos online.”
One of the plaintiffs, Kewal Singh Sekhon, was president of Reno’s Sikh Temple. Another was a member, according to a court document in the case that cited an article by Rajan Zed in 2012 published on This Is Reno.
“I sent the videos to the group of ten Sikhs to show that American Sikhs, despite the conservative values of Sikhism, know how to party and have a good time,” Walia said in a sworn statement filed in Washoe County’s Second Judicial District Court.
This Is Reno’s second public records lawsuit against the City of Reno and Ren...This Is Reno
This Is Reno is suing the city of Reno and Reno Police Department for failing to follow the Nevada Public Records Act. The suit alleges continued violations of state records law, including failing to follow mandated deadlines and not providing reasonable estimates as to when records will be made public. Examples include the city closing records requests without ever providing records and making requesters wait more than a year for records, including body cam footage. It’s the second lawsuit filed by the news media outlet against the city.
Joey Gilbert threatens youth soccer league, gets savage responseThis Is Reno
Nevada Governor candidate and far-right conspiracy theorist Joey Gilbert last year threatened to sue the Great Basin Youth Soccer League in an 11-page letter. He demanded the league fire volunteers, accused the league of unlawful behavior by enforcing state mask mandates and said the league violating the Nuremberg Code of Ethics by alleging it was conducting research involving human subjects. The page-and-a-half response, by the League's attorney, Theodore Chrissinger, is savage. "Your letter does not identify your client," Chrissinger wrote. "Your letter does not identify any breach of contract, tort, crime, or other actionable conduct. I am uncertain why you refer to Dr. Mengele, the Nuremberg Code, or medical 'experimentation.' GBYSL has not mandated any medical experimentation." The threat went nowhere.
Court awards attorney fees to This Is Reno in public records lawsuit against ...This Is Reno
Washoe County District Court Judge Kathleen Drakulich this week awarded costs and attorney fees to This Is Reno in its public records lawsuit against the Reno Police Department.
Last year, This Is Reno sued RPD for failing to follow Nevada public records laws. Drakulich partially agreed. She said RPD failed to respond to a number of This Is Reno’s public records orders within the time frame required by law – up to seven months in one case.
Drakulich, however, said RPD properly denied the release of documents relevant to open investigations. She also said RPD can continue to redact officer faces from body worn cameras, a practice This Is Reno attempted to challenge.
Body cam redaction policies are inconsistently applied in Nevada. Most other states in the country do not redact officer faces, a point the Reno city attorney said was irrelevant.
In Nevada, some law enforcement entities are redacting officer faces from videos. That includes the back of officer heads, in RPD’s case.
The reason for the redactions, according to the Reno city attorney: The law prohibits the release of an officer’s photograph to the public unless the officer gives permission for the release.
Former employee fires back after being sued by Community Health AllianceThis Is Reno
James Fleming, who is being sued by his former employer, Community Health Alliance, fired back at the health nonprofit in court filings last week.
He denies wrongdoing and accuses CHA of interfering with the federal investigation into Fleming’s allegations that CHA committed fraud.
Fleming responded to the complaint Feb. 4 after CHA applied for a temporary protective order seeking to prevent Fleming from talking about CHA negatively.
CHA also filed an amended complaint that removed most mentions of Reno City Council member, also CHA’s CEO, Oscar Delgado.
Community Health Alliance's amended lawsuit against its former employeeThis Is Reno
James Fleming, who is being sued by his former employer, the Community Health Alliance fired back at the health nonprofit in court filings last week.
He denies wrongdoing and accuses CHA of interfering with the federal investigation into Fleming’s allegations that CHA committed fraud.
Fleming filed a response to CHA's complaint Feb. 4 after CHA applied for a temporary protective order seeking to prevent Fleming from talking about CHA negatively. CHA also filed an amended complaint that removed most mentions of Reno city council member, also CHA’s CEO, Oscar Delago.
Community Health Alliance in Reno sues former employee (original complaint)This Is Reno
Community Health Alliance executives filed a lawsuit last week in district court demanding a former employee stop speaking negatively of the non-profit health provider. CHA also filed a temporary protective order against the employee to prevent him from divulging what they said is confidential information.
Jim Fleming, the employee, said he is preparing to fight the claims and has received assistance from the ACLU of Nevada.
Fleming, CHA’s former statistician, has publicly alleged CHA CEO Oscar Delgado, also a Reno City Council member, was knowledgeable about and allowed fraud and the misuse of grant funds.
Fleming posts detailed allegations against CHA and its executives on Facebook, LinkedIn and his Medium account.
“Data show that Community Health Alliance severely underperformed in its contractual duties relative to the funds it received from the state of Nevada,” Fleming recently wrote on Facebook. “Even worse, in an attempt to demonstrate costs that would justify continued state contracts at their current levels, CHA deliberately falsified employment records. These employee records were used to bolster the full-time equivalent (FTE) tally, and therefore the costs, that were dedicated to the program in 2020.”
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General is investigating Fleming’s claim he filed last year. He filed the complaint with the federal agency saying he was fired by CHA in retaliation after he raised concerns about the nonprofit’s practices.
Civil rights lawsuit filed against Truckee Meadows Community CollegeThis Is Reno
The attempt to fire longtime college math professor Lars Jensen by Truckee Meadows Community College administrators failed last year. This week, Jensen filed a lawsuit against five TMCC administrators and Nevada System of Higher Education Chancellor Melody Rose.
Prior to filing the lawsuit, and after a committee of TMCC employees recommended President Karin Hilgersom not fire him, Jensen’s attempt at a mediation was rebuffed, he said in December.
“After having agreed to mediation on Dec 9 on my EEOC complaint against TMCC for retaliation and discrimination, TMCC has suddenly cancelled mediation and declined to reschedule before the mediation deadline on Jan 31,” he told This Is Reno last month.
An email from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission shows TMCC “decided not to participate in a mediation session before 31 January 2022,” a federal mediator wrote. Jensen filed the EEOC complaint in August, and said the federal agency scheduled a mediation session for Dec. 9, 2021.
“I received an email from the employer stating that it was cancelling the mediation session, scheduled for Thursday 9 December 2021,” the mediator wrote. “This is very unfortunate; particularly because this charge has been at the Alternative Dispute Resolution Unit since 30 August 2021, and I am only able to retain it until 31 January 2022.”
Jensen, in December, said litigation was the next step. Three attorneys representing him filed the lawsuit this week on his behalf.
He has been supported by free-speech and professors’ rights organizations, which have issued statements protesting his treatment at TMCC.
A process server is a authorized person for delivering legal documents, such as summons, complaints, subpoenas, and other court papers, to peoples involved in legal proceedings.
Understanding the Challenges of Street ChildrenSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
Presentation by Jared Jageler, David Adler, Noelia Duchovny, and Evan Herrnstadt, analysts in CBO’s Microeconomic Studies and Health Analysis Divisions, at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference.
Many ways to support street children.pptxSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 36
Nevada Senate Bill 287, 2019
1. S.B. 287
- *SB287*
SENATE BILL NO. 287–SENATORS PARKS, HANSEN,
SPEARMAN; DENIS AND WOODHOUSE
MARCH 15, 2019
____________
Referred to Committee on Government Affairs
SUMMARY—Revises provisions governing public records.
(BDR 19-648)
FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: May have Fiscal Impact.
Effect on the State: Yes.
~
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new; matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
AN ACT relating to public records; clarifying the records of a
governmental entity that must be made available to the
public to inspect, copy or receive a copy thereof; revising
provisions relating to the manner of providing copies of
public records; revising provisions governing the actions
taken by governmental entities in response to requests for
public records; revising provisions relating to the relief
provided for a requester of a public record who prevails in
a legal proceeding; revising provisions governing
immunity from liability for public officers and employees
who disclose or refuse to disclose certain information;
revising provisions governing the fees that governmental
entities are authorized to charge for a copy of a public
record; providing civil penalties; and providing other
matters properly relating thereto.
Legislative Counsel’s Digest:
Existing law provides that all public books and public records of a state or local1
governmental entity, unless otherwise declared by law to be confidential, are2
required to be open at all times during office hours for the public to inspect, copy or3
receive a copy thereof. Existing law also authorizes a person to request a copy of a4
public record in any medium in which the public record is readily available. (NRS5
239.010) The purpose of the existing law governing public records, as stated in the6
legislative declaration for that law, is, in part, to foster democratic principles by7
providing members of the public with access to inspect and copy public books and8
records to the extent permitted by law. (NRS 239.001) Section 2 of this bill9
provides that the legislative intent is for such access to be provided promptly.10
Section 3 of this bill defines “public record” to mean any of several types of11
2. – 2 –
- *SB287*
records and information prepared, created, used, owned, retained or received in12
connection with the transaction of official business or the provision of a public13
service. Section 12 of this bill provides for making conforming changes relating to14
this definition. Sections 2 and 4 of this bill make changes to conform with existing15
law which provides that, in addition to the right to inspect and copy a public record,16
members of the public have the right to receive a copy of a public record upon17
request.18
With certain exceptions, existing law prohibits a governmental entity from19
charging a fee for providing a copy of a public record that exceeds the actual cost to20
the governmental entity to provide the copy. (NRS 239.052) Section 3 clarifies that21
the actual cost to a governmental entity: (1) includes such direct costs as the cost of22
ink, toner, paper, media and postage; and (2) does not include overhead and labor23
costs that a governmental entity incurs regardless of the request. Section 13 of this24
bill eliminates the authority of a governmental entity to charge an additional fee for25
providing a copy of a public record when extraordinary use of personnel or26
resources is required. (NRS 239.055)27
Existing law generally places certain requirements on a governmental entity28
that has legal custody or control of a public record. (NRS 239.010, 239.0107,29
239.011, 239.0113, 239.0115) Sections 5-9 of this bill change the applicable type30
of custody or control of a public record from “legal custody or control” to31
“possession, custody or control.” Section 5 of this bill specifically authorizes the32
electronic redaction of public records. Section 5 also requires a governmental entity33
to provide a copy of a public record in an electronic format by means of an34
electronic medium unless the public record was requested in a different medium.35
Section 5 further requires that a public record be provided in the electronic format36
in which it was created or prepared, if requested.37
Under existing law, if a person requests to inspect or copy a public record or38
receive a copy of a public record which the governmental entity is unable to make39
available by the end of the fifth business day after the request was received, the40
governmental entity is required to provide written notice of that fact to the person41
who made the request and the date and time after which the public record or the42
copy of the public record will be available. (NRS 239.0107) Section 6 of this bill43
clarifies that the date and time provided to the requester must reflect the earliest44
date and time after which the governmental entity reasonably believes the public45
record will be available. If the public record is not made available by this date and46
time, section 6 requires the governmental entity to provide to the requester, in47
writing, an explanation of the reason the public record is not available and a date48
and time after which the governmental entity reasonably believes the public record49
will be available. Section 6 also requires a governmental entity that is unable to50
provide access to a public record within the prescribed time period to make a51
reasonable effort to assist the requester to focus the request in such a manner as to52
maximize the likelihood the requester will be able to inspect, copy or receive a53
copy of the public record as expeditiously as possible. Section 6 additionally54
requires a person who has possession, custody or control of a public record of a55
governmental entity to provide to a requester certain contact information regarding56
the person who is responsible for making the decision on behalf of the57
governmental entity concerning the action the governmental entity will take with58
respect to the request for the public record or any other decision in connection with59
the request.60
If a request for inspection, copying or copies of a public record is denied,61
existing law authorizes a requester to apply to a district court for an order62
permitting the requester to inspect or copy the record or requiring the person who63
has legal custody or control of the public record to provide a copy to the requester.64
Existing law provides that if the requester prevails in such a proceeding, the65
requester is entitled to recover his or her costs and reasonable attorney’s fees in the66
3. – 3 –
- *SB287*
proceeding from the governmental entity whose officer has custody of the record.67
(NRS 239.011) Section 7 of this bill authorizes a requester of a public record to68
apply to a district court for a similar order if a request for inspection, copying or69
copies of a public record is unreasonably delayed or if a person who requests a70
copy of a public record believes that the fee charged by the governmental entity for71
providing the copy of the public record is excessive or improper. Section 772
additionally provides that if the requester prevails in a proceeding involving an73
unreasonable delay in the provision of a public record or the imposition of an74
excessive or improper fee for the public record, the requester is entitled to recover75
from the governmental entity his or her costs and reasonable attorney’s fees and76
$100 per day for each day that the requester was denied the right to inspect, copy or77
receive a copy of the public record. Section 7 also authorizes the recovery of this78
daily monetary penalty for the denial of a request for a public record. Section 779
further provides that if the governmental entity appeals the decision of the district80
court and the decision is affirmed in whole or in part, the requester is also entitled81
to recover from the governmental entity his or her costs and reasonable attorney’s82
fees for the appeal and $100 per day for each day that the requester was denied the83
right to inspect, copy or receive a copy of the public record. Section 1 of this bill84
provides that, in addition to any such costs, attorney’s fees or other monetary85
awards, the requester of a public record is entitled to recover a civil penalty and to86
any additional relief deemed proper by the court if a governmental entity or the87
person who is responsible for making decisions on behalf of the governmental88
entity relating to the public record request fails to comply with the existing law89
governing public records.90
Existing law confers immunity from liability for damages upon public officers91
and employees who act in good faith in disclosing or refusing to disclose92
information. (NRS 239.012) Section 10 of this bill provides that the burden of93
proof that a public officer or employee acted in good faith in refusing to disclose94
information is on the public officer or employee or his or her employer. Section 1095
also clarifies that the immunity from liability for damages for public officers and96
employees does not include immunity from liability for paying the costs and97
reasonable attorney’s fees and other monetary relief awarded to a prevailing98
requester. Section 11 of this bill provides that the provisions of the bill apply to99
actions that are currently pending on October 1, 2019, which is the effective date of100
this bill, as well as to actions filed on and after October 1, 2019.101
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN
SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 239 of NRS is hereby amended by adding1
thereto a new section to read as follows:2
1. In addition to any relief awarded pursuant to NRS3
239.011, if a court determines that a governmental entity or the4
person identified pursuant to subsection 3 of NRS 239.0107 as5
responsible for making the decision on behalf of the governmental6
entity concerning the request to inspect, copy or receive a copy of a7
public record failed to comply with the provisions of this chapter,8
the requester of the public record is entitled to:9
(a) Recover from the governmental entity or the person10
identified pursuant to subsection 3 of NRS 239.0107, or both, a11
4. – 4 –
- *SB287*
civil penalty of not less than $1,000 or more than $250,000 per1
offense.2
(b) Any such additional relief as the court deems proper to3
punish and deter violations of the provisions of this chapter.4
2. The rights and remedies recognized by this section are in5
addition to any other rights or remedies that may exist in law or in6
equity.7
Sec. 2. NRS 239.001 is hereby amended to read as follows:8
239.001 The Legislature hereby finds and declares that:9
1. The purpose of this chapter is to foster democratic principles10
by providing members of the public with prompt access to inspect ,11
[and] copy or receive a copy of, including, without limitation, in an12
electronic format by means of an electronic medium, public [books13
and] records to the extent permitted by law;14
2. The provisions of this chapter must be construed liberally to15
carry out this important purpose;16
3. Any exemption, exception or balancing of interests which17
limits or restricts access to public [books and] records by members18
of the public must be construed narrowly;19
4. The use of private entities in the provision of public services20
must not deprive members of the public access to inspect , [and]21
copy [books and] or receive a copy of records relating to the22
provision of those services; and23
5. If a public [book or] record is declared by law to be open to24
the public, such a declaration does not imply, and must not be25
construed to mean, that a public [book or] record is confidential if it26
is not declared by law to be open to the public and is not otherwise27
declared by law to be confidential.28
Sec. 3. NRS 239.005 is hereby amended to read as follows:29
239.005 As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise30
requires:31
1. “Actual cost” means the direct cost [related to the32
reproduction] incurred by a governmental entity in the provision of33
a public record [.] , including, without limitation, the cost of ink,34
toner, paper, media and postage. The term does not include a cost35
that a governmental entity incurs regardless of whether or not a36
person requests a copy of a particular public record [.] , including,37
without limitation, any overhead costs of the governmental entity38
and any labor costs incurred by a governmental entity in the39
provision of a public record.40
2. “Agency of the Executive Department” means an agency,41
board, commission, bureau, council, department, division, authority42
or other unit of the Executive Department of the State Government.43
The term does not include the Nevada System of Higher Education.44
5. – 5 –
- *SB287*
3. “Committee” means the Committee to Approve Schedules1
for the Retention and Disposition of Official State Records.2
4. “Division” means the Division of State Library, Archives3
and Public Records of the Department of Administration.4
5. “Governmental entity” means:5
(a) An elected or appointed officer of this State or of a political6
subdivision of this State;7
(b) An institution, board, commission, bureau, council,8
department, division, authority or other unit of government of this9
State, including, without limitation, an agency of the Executive10
Department, or of a political subdivision of this State;11
(c) A university foundation, as defined in NRS 396.405;12
(d) An educational foundation, as defined in NRS 388.750, to13
the extent that the foundation is dedicated to the assistance of public14
schools; or15
(e) A library foundation, as defined in NRS 379.0056, to the16
extent that the foundation is dedicated to the assistance of a public17
library.18
6. “Official state record” includes, without limitation:19
(a) Papers, unpublished books, maps and photographs;20
(b) Information stored on magnetic tape or computer, laser or21
optical disc;22
(c) Materials that are capable of being read by a machine,23
including, without limitation, microforms and audio and visual24
materials; and25
(d) Materials that are made or received by a state agency and26
preserved by that agency or its successor as evidence of the27
organization, operation, policy or any other activity of that agency28
or because of the information contained in the material.29
7. “Privatization contract” means a contract executed by or on30
behalf of a governmental entity which authorizes a private entity to31
provide public services that are:32
(a) Substantially similar to the services provided by the public33
employees of the governmental entity; and34
(b) In lieu of the services otherwise authorized or required to be35
provided by the governmental entity.36
8. “Public record” means any record, document, paper, letter,37
map, notes, calendar, spreadsheet, database, book, tape,38
photograph, film, sound recording, video recording, data39
processing software, computer and other electronic data,40
metadata, electronic mail or any other material or means of41
recording information, regardless of the physical form,42
characteristics or means of transmission, which is prepared,43
created, used, owned, retained or received in connection with the44
transaction of official business or the provision of a public service.45
6. – 6 –
- *SB287*
Sec. 4. NRS 239.008 is hereby amended to read as follows:1
239.008 1. The head of each agency of the Executive2
Department shall designate one or more employees of the agency to3
act as records official for the agency.4
2. A records official designated pursuant to subsection 1 shall5
carry out the duties imposed pursuant to this chapter on the agency6
of the Executive Department that designated him or her with respect7
to a request to inspect , [or] copy or receive a copy of a public [book8
or] record of the agency.9
3. The State Library, Archives and Public Records10
Administrator, pursuant to NRS 378.255 and in cooperation with the11
Attorney General, shall prescribe:12
(a) The form for a request by a person to inspect , [or] copy or13
receive a copy of a public [book or] record of an agency of the14
Executive Department pursuant to NRS 239.0107;15
(b) The form for the written notice required to be provided by an16
agency of the Executive Department pursuant to paragraph (b), (c)17
or (d) of subsection 1 of NRS 239.0107; and18
(c) By regulation the procedures with which a records official19
must comply in carrying out his or her duties.20
4. Each agency of the Executive Department shall make21
available on any website maintained by the agency on the Internet or22
its successor the forms and procedures prescribed by the State23
Library, Archives and Public Records Administrator and the24
Attorney General pursuant to subsection 3.25
Sec. 5. NRS 239.010 is hereby amended to read as follows:26
239.010 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section and27
NRS 1.4683, 1.4687, 1A.110, 3.2203, 41.071, 49.095, 49.293,28
62D.420, 62D.440, 62E.516, 62E.620, 62H.025, 62H.030, 62H.170,29
62H.220, 62H.320, 75A.100, 75A.150, 76.160, 78.152, 80.113,30
81.850, 82.183, 86.246, 86.54615, 87.515, 87.5413, 87A.200,31
87A.580, 87A.640, 88.3355, 88.5927, 88.6067, 88A.345, 88A.7345,32
89.045, 89.251, 90.730, 91.160, 116.757, 116A.270, 116B.880,33
118B.026, 119.260, 119.265, 119.267, 119.280, 119A.280,34
119A.653, 119B.370, 119B.382, 120A.690, 125.130, 125B.140,35
126.141, 126.161, 126.163, 126.730, 127.007, 127.057, 127.130,36
127.140, 127.2817, 128.090, 130.312, 130.712, 136.050, 159.044,37
159A.044, 172.075, 172.245, 176.01249, 176.015, 176.0625,38
176.09129, 176.156, 176A.630, 178.39801, 178.4715, 178.5691,39
179.495, 179A.070, 179A.165, 179D.160, 200.3771, 200.3772,40
200.5095, 200.604, 202.3662, 205.4651, 209.392, 209.3925,41
209.419, 209.521, 211A.140, 213.010, 213.040, 213.095, 213.131,42
217.105, 217.110, 217.464, 217.475, 218A.350, 218E.625,43
218F.150, 218G.130, 218G.240, 218G.350, 228.270, 228.450,44
228.495, 228.570, 231.069, 231.1473, 233.190, 237.300, 239.0105,45
8. – 8 –
- *SB287*
648.197, 649.065, 649.067, 652.228, 654.110, 656.105, 661.115,1
665.130, 665.133, 669.275, 669.285, 669A.310, 671.170, 673.450,2
673.480, 675.380, 676A.340, 676A.370, 677.243, 679B.122,3
679B.152, 679B.159, 679B.190, 679B.285, 679B.690, 680A.270,4
681A.440, 681B.260, 681B.410, 681B.540, 683A.0873, 685A.077,5
686A.289, 686B.170, 686C.306, 687A.110, 687A.115, 687C.010,6
688C.230, 688C.480, 688C.490, 689A.696, 692A.117, 692C.190,7
692C.3507, 692C.3536, 692C.3538, 692C.354, 692C.420,8
693A.480, 693A.615, 696B.550, 696C.120, 703.196, 704B.320,9
704B.325, 706.1725, 706A.230, 710.159, 711.600, sections 35, 3810
and 41 of chapter 478, Statutes of Nevada 2011 and section 2 of11
chapter 391, Statutes of Nevada 2013 and unless otherwise declared12
by law to be confidential, all public [books and public] records of a13
governmental entity must be open at all times during office hours to14
inspection by any person, and may be fully copied or an abstract or15
memorandum may be prepared from those public [books and public]16
records. Any such copies, abstracts or memoranda may be used to17
supply the general public with copies, abstracts or memoranda of the18
records or may be used in any other way to the advantage of the19
governmental entity or of the general public. This section does not20
supersede or in any manner affect the federal laws governing21
copyrights or enlarge, diminish or affect in any other manner the22
rights of a person in any written [book or] record which is23
copyrighted pursuant to federal law.24
2. A governmental entity may not reject a [book or] record25
which is copyrighted solely because it is copyrighted.26
3. A governmental entity that has [legal] possession, custody27
or control of a public [book or] record shall not deny a request made28
pursuant to subsection 1 to inspect or copy or receive a copy of a29
public [book or] record on the basis that the requested public [book30
or] record contains information that is confidential if the31
governmental entity can redact, delete, conceal or separate ,32
including, without limitation, electronically, the confidential33
information from the information included in the public [book or]34
record that is not otherwise confidential.35
4. A [person may request] governmental entity shall provide a36
copy of a public record in [any] an electronic format by means of37
an electronic medium [in which the public record is readily38
available.] unless the public record was requested in a different39
medium. If requested, a copy of a public record must be provided40
in the electronic format in which the public record was created or41
prepared.42
9. – 9 –
- *SB287*
5. An officer, employee or agent of a governmental entity who1
has [legal] possession, custody or control of a public record:2
(a) Shall not refuse to provide a copy of that public record in [a3
readily available] the medium that is requested because the officer,4
employee or agent has already prepared or would prefer to provide5
the copy in a different medium.6
(b) Except as otherwise provided in NRS 239.030, shall, upon7
request, prepare the copy of the public record and shall not require8
the person who has requested the copy to prepare the copy himself9
or herself.10
Sec. 6. NRS 239.0107 is hereby amended to read as follows:11
239.0107 1. Not later than the end of the fifth business day12
after the date on which the person who has [legal] possession,13
custody or control of a public [book or] record of a governmental14
entity receives a written or oral request from a person to inspect,15
copy or receive a copy of the public [book or] record, a16
governmental entity shall do one of the following, as applicable:17
(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, allow the18
person to inspect or copy the public [book or] record or, if the19
request is for the person to receive a copy of the public [book or]20
record, provide such a copy to the person.21
(b) If the governmental entity does not have [legal] possession,22
custody or control of the public [book or] record, provide to the23
person, in writing:24
(1) Notice of [that] the fact [;] that it does not have25
possession, custody or control of the public record; and26
(2) The name and address of the governmental entity that has27
[legal] possession, custody or control of the public [book or] record,28
if known.29
(c) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (d), if the30
governmental entity is unable to make the public [book or] record31
available by the end of the fifth business day after the date on which32
the person who has [legal] possession, custody or control of the33
public [book or] record received the request [, provide] :34
(1) Provide to the person, in writing [:35
(1) Notice] notice of [that] the fact [;] that it is unable to36
make the public record available by that date and37
[(2) A] the earliest date and time after which the38
governmental entity reasonably believes the public [book or] record39
will be available for the person to inspect or copy or after which a40
copy of the public [book or] record will be available to the person. If41
the public [book or] record or the copy of the public [book or]42
record is not available to the person by that date and time, the43
[person may inquire regarding the status of the request.]44
governmental entity shall provide to the person, in writing, an45
10. – 10 –
- *SB287*
explanation of the reason the public record is not available and a1
date and time after which the governmental entity reasonably2
believes the public record will be available for the person to3
inspect or copy or after which a copy of the public record will be4
available to the person.5
(2) Make a reasonable effort to assist the requester to focus6
the request in such a manner as to maximize the likelihood the7
requester will be able to inspect, copy or receive a copy of the8
public record as expeditiously as possible, including, without9
limitation, by:10
(I) Advising the requester regarding terms to be used or11
the applicable database in which to perform a search for the12
public record;13
(II) Eliciting additional clarifying information from the14
requester that will assist the person who has possession, custody or15
control of a public record in identifying the public record;16
(III) Providing suggestions for overcoming any practical17
basis that would deny or otherwise limit access to the public18
record; and19
(IV) Describing the manner in which the public record20
is stored, including, without limitation, whether the public record21
is stored electronically.22
(d) If the governmental entity must deny the person’s request23
because the public [book or] record, or a part thereof, is24
confidential, provide to the person, in writing:25
(1) Notice of that fact; and26
(2) A citation to the specific statute or other legal authority27
that makes the public [book or] record, or a part thereof,28
confidential.29
2. If a public [book or] record of a governmental entity is30
readily available for inspection or copying, the person who has31
[legal] possession, custody or control of the public [book or] record32
shall allow a person who has submitted a request to inspect, copy or33
receive a copy of a public [book or] record [.] as expeditiously as34
practicable.35
3. In addition to performing the actions required by36
subsections 1 and 2, the person who has possession, custody or37
control of a public record of a governmental entity shall provide in38
writing to a person who makes a request for the public record:39
(a) The name and title or position of the person responsible for40
making the decision on behalf of the governmental entity41
concerning the action the governmental entity will take pursuant42
to this section concerning the request or any other decision in43
connection with the request; and44
11. – 11 –
- *SB287*
(b) Contact information for the person described in paragraph1
(a), including, without limitation, his or her business address,2
telephone number and electronic mail address.3
Sec. 7. NRS 239.011 is hereby amended to read as follows:4
239.011 1. If a request for inspection, copying or copies of a5
public [book or] record open to inspection and copying is denied [,]6
or unreasonably delayed or if a person who requests a copy of a7
public record believes that the fee charged by the governmental8
entity for providing the copy of the public record is excessive or9
improper, the requester may apply to the district court in the county10
in which the [book or] record is located for an order:11
(a) Permitting the requester to inspect or copy the [book or]12
record; [or]13
(b) Requiring the person who has [legal] possession, custody or14
control of the public [book or] record to provide a copy to the15
requester [,] ; or16
(c) Providing relief relating to the amount of the fee,17
as applicable.18
2. The court shall give this matter priority over other civil19
matters to which priority is not given by other statutes. If the20
requester prevails, the requester is entitled to recover [his] from the21
governmental entity that has possession, custody or control of the22
record:23
(a) His or her costs and reasonable attorney’s fees in the24
proceeding [from the governmental entity whose officer has custody25
of the book or record.] ; and26
(b) One hundred dollars per day for each day he or she was27
denied the right to inspect, copy or receive a copy of the public28
record.29
3. If the governmental entity appeals the decision of the30
district court and the decision is affirmed in whole or in part, the31
requester is entitled to recover from the governmental entity that32
has possession, custody or control of the record:33
(a) His or her costs and reasonable attorney’s fees for the34
appeal; and35
(b) One hundred dollars per day for each day he or she was36
denied the right to inspect, copy or receive a copy of the public37
record.38
4. The rights and remedies recognized by this section are in39
addition to any other rights or remedies that may exist in law or in40
equity.41
Sec. 8. NRS 239.0113 is hereby amended to read as follows:42
239.0113 Except as otherwise provided in NRS 239.0115, if:43
1. The confidentiality of a public [book or] record, or a part44
thereof, is at issue in a judicial or administrative proceeding; and45
12. – 12 –
- *SB287*
2. The governmental entity that has [legal] possession, custody1
or control of the public [book or] record asserts that the public [book2
or] record, or a part thereof, is confidential,3
the governmental entity has the burden of proving by a4
preponderance of the evidence that the public [book or] record, or a5
part thereof, is confidential.6
Sec. 9. NRS 239.0115 is hereby amended to read as follows:7
239.0115 1. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection8
and subsection 3, notwithstanding any provision of law that has9
declared a public [book or] record, or a part thereof, to be10
confidential, if a public [book or] record has been in the [legal]11
possession, custody or control of one or more governmental entities12
for at least 30 years, a person may apply to the district court of the13
county in which the governmental entity that currently has [legal]14
possession, custody or control of the public [book or] record is15
located for an order directing that governmental entity to allow the16
person to inspect or copy the public [book or] record, or a part17
thereof. If the public [book or] record pertains to a natural person, a18
person may not apply for an order pursuant to this subsection until19
the public [book or] record has been in the [legal] possession,20
custody or control of one or more governmental entities for at least21
30 years or until the death of the person to whom the public [book22
or] record pertains, whichever is later.23
2. There is a rebuttable presumption that a person who applies24
for an order as described in subsection 1 is entitled to inspect or25
copy the public [book or] record, or a part thereof, that the person26
seeks to inspect or copy.27
3. The provisions of subsection 1 do not apply to any [book or]28
record:29
(a) Declared confidential pursuant to NRS 463.120.30
(b) Containing personal information pertaining to a victim of31
crime that has been declared by law to be confidential.32
Sec. 10. NRS 239.012 is hereby amended to read as follows:33
239.012 1. A public officer or employee who acts in good34
faith in disclosing or refusing to disclose information and the35
employer of the public officer or employee are immune from36
liability for damages, either to the requester or to the person whom37
the information concerns. Such damages do not include any costs38
and reasonable attorney’s fees or other monetary amount awarded39
to the requester pursuant to NRS 239.011 or section 1 of this act.40
2. For the purposes of subsection 1, the public officer or41
employee or his or her employer, as applicable, has the burden of42
proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the public officer43
or employee acted in good faith in refusing to disclose44
information.45
13. – 13 –
- *SB287*
Sec. 11. The amendatory provisions of this act apply to all1
actions pending or filed on or after October 1, 2019.2
Sec. 12. 1. When the next reprint of Nevada Revised3
Statutes is prepared by the Legislative Counsel, the Legislative4
Counsel shall replace the term “public book or record” as it appears5
in the Nevada Revised Statutes with the term “public record” in the6
manner provided in this act.7
2. The Legislative Counsel shall, in preparing supplements to8
the Nevada Administrative Code, make such changes as necessary9
so that the term “public book or record” is replaced with the term10
“public record” as provided for in this act.11
3. To the extent that revisions are made to Nevada Revised12
Statutes pursuant to subsection 1, the revisions shall be construed as13
nonsubstantive and it is not the intent of the Nevada Legislature to14
modify any existing interpretations of any statute which is so15
revised.16
Sec. 13. NRS 239.055 is hereby repealed.17
TEXT OF REPEALED SECTION
239.055 Additional fee when extraordinary use of personnel
or resources is required; limitation.
1. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 239.054 regarding
information provided from a geographic information system, if a
request for a copy of a public record would require a governmental
entity to make extraordinary use of its personnel or technological
resources, the governmental entity may, in addition to any other fee
authorized pursuant to this chapter, charge a fee not to exceed 50
cents per page for such extraordinary use. Such a request must be
made in writing, and upon receiving such a request, the
governmental entity shall inform the requester, in writing, of the
amount of the fee before preparing the requested information. The
fee charged by the governmental entity must be reasonable and must
be based on the cost that the governmental entity actually incurs for
the extraordinary use of its personnel or technological resources.
The governmental entity shall not charge such a fee if the
governmental entity is not required to make extraordinary use of its
personnel or technological resources to fulfill additional requests for
the same information.
14. – 14 –
- *SB287*
2. As used in this section, “technological resources” means any
information, information system or information service acquired,
developed, operated, maintained or otherwise used by a
governmental entity.
H