Netflix’s rise from a 1997 DVD-by-mail service to a global streaming empire has radically transformed not only viewing habits but also the foundations of film and television criticism. The presentation begins by posing a critical research question: How has Netflix reshaped the politics of film and TV criticism in the streaming era? The hypothesis argues that Netflix’s algorithmic curation, transnational reach, and redefinition of “authenticity” have restructured the critical ecosystem—shifting evaluative power from professional critics to data-driven systems and global audiences (Yu 5; Lobato 74). After tracing Netflix’s origins and evolution, the presentation maps traditional film criticism’s dependence on auteur theory, aesthetic judgment, and institutional gatekeeping, contrasting it with Netflix’s digital, participatory model. Through a cultural studies lens, Netflix is positioned as both a technological innovator and an ideological force, transforming spectatorship into an algorithmically guided act of consumption. The section on algorithmic curation explains how recommendation systems dictate visibility and success, producing what Mareike Jenner calls “platform authorship,” where algorithms, not directors, shape taste and meaning (Jenner 92). The infographic on “The Myths of Streaming” deconstructs common assumptions—such as the idea that streaming democratizes access—by revealing how global distribution often privileges Western-centric production and data-based market logic (Lobato 80).
The case studies—The Irishman (2019), Roma (2018), and Squid Game (2021)—demonstrate Netflix’s double role as cultural producer and critical arbiter. Martin Scorsese’s The Irishman highlights the theatrical release debate, as Netflix’s refusal to follow traditional exhibition windows challenged Hollywood’s power structures and raised questions about cinema’s ontology in the digital age. The Cannes controversy (2017) section examines the festival’s ban on Netflix films without theatrical releases, symbolizing the tension between art and algorithm, tradition and innovation. Alfonso Cuarón’s Roma exemplifies the global prestige Netflix seeks: an auteur-driven film distributed through a corporate algorithm, merging cinematic artistry with platform capitalism. In contrast, Squid Game showcases Netflix’s algorithmic influence in amplifying non-Western narratives for mass appeal, reconfiguring global critical discourse. Collectively, these examples reveal that Netflix doesn’t merely distribute films—it constructs the frameworks through which films are seen, valued, and critiqued. The conclusion asserts that film criticism must now contend with a platform-based cultural order where metrics replace meaning, and algorithmic systems mediate artistic visibility. Thus, Netflix becomes not just a site of entertainment but a political apparatus redefining authorship, spectatorship, and the global circulation of cinematic value.