The Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium (NCOIC) is a global organization dedicated to facilitating interoperability across joint, interagency, intergovernmental, and multinational industrial and commercial operations through network centric capabilities. It has over 80 member organizations from 18 countries and advisors from 26 stakeholders. The NCOIC develops standards, frameworks, and tools to assess and achieve interoperability, focusing on domains like aviation, C3, cybersecurity, and more.
“Serious Games and the Smart Defense Initiative” By Paul Thurkettle - Serious...SeriousGamesAssoc
Paul Thurkettle speaks about “Serious Games and the Smart Defense Initiative” at the Serious Play Conference 2012
ABSTRACT:
Following the NATO summit in Chicago, the NATO Secretary General has received from Heads of States a clear mandate to continue his initiative, Smart Defense. As national budgets are cut and nations seek to reduce their spending, NATO has started many initiatives to make itself more effective as well as supporting national development and reductions. One of these initiatives is the adoption of serious games for use by NATO, NATO and partner nations.
Launch of CDE themed call for research proposals "Generic Enablers for Low Size, Weight, Power and Cost ISTAR". Call closes Friday 15 March 2013 at 1700 hrs. For more information visit: http://www.science.mod.uk/events/event_detail.aspx?eventid=199
“Serious Games and the Smart Defense Initiative” By Paul Thurkettle - Serious...SeriousGamesAssoc
Paul Thurkettle speaks about “Serious Games and the Smart Defense Initiative” at the Serious Play Conference 2012
ABSTRACT:
Following the NATO summit in Chicago, the NATO Secretary General has received from Heads of States a clear mandate to continue his initiative, Smart Defense. As national budgets are cut and nations seek to reduce their spending, NATO has started many initiatives to make itself more effective as well as supporting national development and reductions. One of these initiatives is the adoption of serious games for use by NATO, NATO and partner nations.
Launch of CDE themed call for research proposals "Generic Enablers for Low Size, Weight, Power and Cost ISTAR". Call closes Friday 15 March 2013 at 1700 hrs. For more information visit: http://www.science.mod.uk/events/event_detail.aspx?eventid=199
Overview and introductory remarks for the OGF sessions held May 21-22, 2015 co-located with the European Grid Initiative 2015 conference that took place the week of May 18-22, 2015 in Lisbon, Portugal. For details, see https://www.ogf.org/ogf/doku.php/events/ogf-44
MPLS/SDN 2013 Intercloud Standardization and Testbeds - SillAlan Sill
This talk givens an overview of several multi-SDO and cross-SDO activities to promote and spur innovation in cloud computing. The focus is on API development and standardization, including testbeds, test use cases, and collaborative activities between organizations to create and carry out development and testing in this area. The focus is on work being pursued through the Cloud and Autonomic Computing Center at Texas Tech University, which is part of the US National Science Foundation's Industry/University Cooperative Research Center, and on work being done by standards organizations such as the Open Grid Forum, Distributed Management Task Force, and Telecommunications Management Forum in which the CAC@TTU is involved. A summary is also given of work to produce a new round of more detailed use cases suitable for testing by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology's Standards Acceleration to Jumpstart Adoption of Cloud Computing (SAJACC) working group, with brief mention also given to other related work going on in this area in other parts of the world. Background and other standards work is also mentioned.
Learn about the Open Data Center Alliance Workgroups, Usage Models and Roadmap Structure from the perspective of the Alliance Technical Coordination Committee. This presentation was used in the Nov. 18, 2010 Alliance Webcast delivered by Howard Grodin, VP of Strategic Programs, Terrermark; Alliance Technical Coordination Committee Member, and Ravi Subranamiam, Intel Corporation; Alliance Technical Advisor.
For more information about the Open Data Center Alliance, visit www.opendatacenteralliance.org. You will also find the Webcast recording that accompanies this presentation there.
Software Defined Networks Network Function Virtualization Pivotal TechnologiesOpen Networking Summits
Margaret T. Chiosi
Distinguished Network Architect
AT&T Labs
Agenda
Overview of NFV, NFV and SDN synergy, standardization and role of opensource – Margaret Chiosi, AT&T
Spreading NFV through the Network: the NFV Use Cases - Andrea Pinnola, Telecom Italia
Building a Digital Telco: Network Virtualisation experiences – Francisco Javier Salguero, Telefonica
DOCOMO's Challenges for Network Virtualization in Mobile Networks - Tetsuya Nakamura, NTT Docomo
Deployment of SDN and NFV : Vendor perspectives and experiences - Karthikeyan Subramaniam, Adara
NFV-SDN Synergy
Technology Track Session
ONS2015: http://bit.ly/ons2015sd
ONS Inspire! Webinars: http://bit.ly/oiw-sd
Watch the talk (video) on ONS Content Archives: http://bit.ly/ons-archives-sd
Abstract:
Following the state of the art is paramount for sound and impact scientific practices informed strategic R&D decisions. This seminar seeks two main contributions: (i) providing a 10,000 foot view of 10 selected hot topics in networking, and (ii) Overview of recent practices in scientific events (e.g. Digitalization, Submission deadlines revisited, Open Science, Artifact Review Badging).
The 10 selected hot topics are as follows:
Intent-Based Networking (IBN)
Zero-Touch Management (ZTM)
Digital Twins (Networking for Digital Twins & Network Digital Twins)
Metaverse
Blockchain Networking
AI/ML (Network protocols meet AI/ML, Machine Learning for Networking)
High precision networking
Quantum Communications & Computing
6G (Beyond 5G)
OpenRAN
Edge Computing Standardisation and InitiativesAxel Rennoch
Since Edge Computing (EC) became more important in industry and research several standardisation groups and initiatives are considering related technologies in their strategies and future roadmaps. The work includes the definition of reference architecture models, access interfaces but also addresses edge node autonomy and security aspects. This contribution introduces some basic concepts and common understanding of EC within selected standardisation groups and industrial initiatives. Additionally, technical viewpoints and topics are discussed that are relevant for various communities.
3rd Workshop on Advances in Slicing for Softwarized Infrastructures (S4SI 2020)
Panel: Network Slicing is multifaceted but does its approach and understanding need to be fragmented?
Abstract: Network Slicing keeps growing in significance in the academic and industrial communities. Network Slicing can be defined from different functional or behavioral perspectives, as well as from different viewpoints depending on the stakeholder (e.g., verticals, solution providers, infrastructure owners) and the technical domain (e.g. cloud data centers, radio access, packet/optical transport networks). Standardization bodies and open source projects are being involved in some forms of network slicing support. How far are these views from each other? Is fragmentation leading to incompatible approaches or is there some hope of convergence, at least at conceptual levels? What is the next frontier in Network Slicing? These and other questions will be thrown to our panel experts after introducing their lightning viewpoints.
Moderator: Christian Esteve Rothenberg, University of Campinas, Brazil
Panel Members
Constantine Polychronopoulos, Juniper Networks, USA
Uma Chunduri, Futurewei, USA
Slawomir Kuklinski, Orange Poland and Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
Stuart Clayman, University College London, UK
Augusto Venancio Neto, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
SDN/NFV Sudanese Research Group Initiative Ahmed Hassan
Initiating a research body for Software Defined Networking (SDN) and Network Functions Virtualization (NFV). This group aims to put Sudan on the map of SDN/NFV technologies and guide Sudanese researchers in these areas to conduct advance and high quality scientific research, also exchange knowledge, resources and experience with local and international research entities.
This benchmark is the result of the collaboration between Burstorm and Rice University and uses a high degree of automation. The scope of the first benchmark is seven suppliers across three continents with a total of 96 different instance types. The benchmark was executed every day, for at least 15 days. The results are normalized to a monthly pricing model to establish the price-performance metrics.
Cloud Computing is an information technology gold rush. Everything from social media and smart phones to streaming video and additive games come from the cloud. This revolution has also driven many to wonder how they can retool themselves to take advantage of this massive shift. Many in IT see the technology as an opportunity to accelerate their careers but in their attempt to navigate their cloud computing future, the question of what type of training, vendor-neutral or vendor-specific, is right for them
Overview and introductory remarks for the OGF sessions held May 21-22, 2015 co-located with the European Grid Initiative 2015 conference that took place the week of May 18-22, 2015 in Lisbon, Portugal. For details, see https://www.ogf.org/ogf/doku.php/events/ogf-44
MPLS/SDN 2013 Intercloud Standardization and Testbeds - SillAlan Sill
This talk givens an overview of several multi-SDO and cross-SDO activities to promote and spur innovation in cloud computing. The focus is on API development and standardization, including testbeds, test use cases, and collaborative activities between organizations to create and carry out development and testing in this area. The focus is on work being pursued through the Cloud and Autonomic Computing Center at Texas Tech University, which is part of the US National Science Foundation's Industry/University Cooperative Research Center, and on work being done by standards organizations such as the Open Grid Forum, Distributed Management Task Force, and Telecommunications Management Forum in which the CAC@TTU is involved. A summary is also given of work to produce a new round of more detailed use cases suitable for testing by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology's Standards Acceleration to Jumpstart Adoption of Cloud Computing (SAJACC) working group, with brief mention also given to other related work going on in this area in other parts of the world. Background and other standards work is also mentioned.
Learn about the Open Data Center Alliance Workgroups, Usage Models and Roadmap Structure from the perspective of the Alliance Technical Coordination Committee. This presentation was used in the Nov. 18, 2010 Alliance Webcast delivered by Howard Grodin, VP of Strategic Programs, Terrermark; Alliance Technical Coordination Committee Member, and Ravi Subranamiam, Intel Corporation; Alliance Technical Advisor.
For more information about the Open Data Center Alliance, visit www.opendatacenteralliance.org. You will also find the Webcast recording that accompanies this presentation there.
Software Defined Networks Network Function Virtualization Pivotal TechnologiesOpen Networking Summits
Margaret T. Chiosi
Distinguished Network Architect
AT&T Labs
Agenda
Overview of NFV, NFV and SDN synergy, standardization and role of opensource – Margaret Chiosi, AT&T
Spreading NFV through the Network: the NFV Use Cases - Andrea Pinnola, Telecom Italia
Building a Digital Telco: Network Virtualisation experiences – Francisco Javier Salguero, Telefonica
DOCOMO's Challenges for Network Virtualization in Mobile Networks - Tetsuya Nakamura, NTT Docomo
Deployment of SDN and NFV : Vendor perspectives and experiences - Karthikeyan Subramaniam, Adara
NFV-SDN Synergy
Technology Track Session
ONS2015: http://bit.ly/ons2015sd
ONS Inspire! Webinars: http://bit.ly/oiw-sd
Watch the talk (video) on ONS Content Archives: http://bit.ly/ons-archives-sd
Abstract:
Following the state of the art is paramount for sound and impact scientific practices informed strategic R&D decisions. This seminar seeks two main contributions: (i) providing a 10,000 foot view of 10 selected hot topics in networking, and (ii) Overview of recent practices in scientific events (e.g. Digitalization, Submission deadlines revisited, Open Science, Artifact Review Badging).
The 10 selected hot topics are as follows:
Intent-Based Networking (IBN)
Zero-Touch Management (ZTM)
Digital Twins (Networking for Digital Twins & Network Digital Twins)
Metaverse
Blockchain Networking
AI/ML (Network protocols meet AI/ML, Machine Learning for Networking)
High precision networking
Quantum Communications & Computing
6G (Beyond 5G)
OpenRAN
Edge Computing Standardisation and InitiativesAxel Rennoch
Since Edge Computing (EC) became more important in industry and research several standardisation groups and initiatives are considering related technologies in their strategies and future roadmaps. The work includes the definition of reference architecture models, access interfaces but also addresses edge node autonomy and security aspects. This contribution introduces some basic concepts and common understanding of EC within selected standardisation groups and industrial initiatives. Additionally, technical viewpoints and topics are discussed that are relevant for various communities.
3rd Workshop on Advances in Slicing for Softwarized Infrastructures (S4SI 2020)
Panel: Network Slicing is multifaceted but does its approach and understanding need to be fragmented?
Abstract: Network Slicing keeps growing in significance in the academic and industrial communities. Network Slicing can be defined from different functional or behavioral perspectives, as well as from different viewpoints depending on the stakeholder (e.g., verticals, solution providers, infrastructure owners) and the technical domain (e.g. cloud data centers, radio access, packet/optical transport networks). Standardization bodies and open source projects are being involved in some forms of network slicing support. How far are these views from each other? Is fragmentation leading to incompatible approaches or is there some hope of convergence, at least at conceptual levels? What is the next frontier in Network Slicing? These and other questions will be thrown to our panel experts after introducing their lightning viewpoints.
Moderator: Christian Esteve Rothenberg, University of Campinas, Brazil
Panel Members
Constantine Polychronopoulos, Juniper Networks, USA
Uma Chunduri, Futurewei, USA
Slawomir Kuklinski, Orange Poland and Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
Stuart Clayman, University College London, UK
Augusto Venancio Neto, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
SDN/NFV Sudanese Research Group Initiative Ahmed Hassan
Initiating a research body for Software Defined Networking (SDN) and Network Functions Virtualization (NFV). This group aims to put Sudan on the map of SDN/NFV technologies and guide Sudanese researchers in these areas to conduct advance and high quality scientific research, also exchange knowledge, resources and experience with local and international research entities.
This benchmark is the result of the collaboration between Burstorm and Rice University and uses a high degree of automation. The scope of the first benchmark is seven suppliers across three continents with a total of 96 different instance types. The benchmark was executed every day, for at least 15 days. The results are normalized to a monthly pricing model to establish the price-performance metrics.
Cloud Computing is an information technology gold rush. Everything from social media and smart phones to streaming video and additive games come from the cloud. This revolution has also driven many to wonder how they can retool themselves to take advantage of this massive shift. Many in IT see the technology as an opportunity to accelerate their careers but in their attempt to navigate their cloud computing future, the question of what type of training, vendor-neutral or vendor-specific, is right for them
The Federal government today is in the midst of a revolution. The revolution is challenging the norms of government by introducing new ways of serving the people. New models for creating services and delivering information; new policies and procedures that are redefining federal acquisition and what it means to be a federal system integrator. This revolution also lacks the physical and tangible artifacts of the past. Its ephemeral nature, global expanse and economic impact all combine in a tidal wave of change. This revolution is called cloud computing.
Since announcing its “Cloud First” policy in 2010, the Federal government has correctly identified cloud computing as a way to reduce costs and improve the use of existing assets, and has accordingly prioritized its adoption. It has also taken judicious steps to protect Federal networks from nefarious cyber-attacks and promote the dissemination of best practices for cybersecurity. The Federal government has also embraced mobility as a means to conduct work from any location. But until now, the implementation of these initiatives has been fragmented and lacked coordination across Federal agencies. This paper offers a framework for integrating these programs in a way that enables the Federal government to realize the economic, technological, and mission-effectiveness benefits of cloud services while simultaneously meeting current Federal cybersecurity
requirements. It advocates shifting from a compliance-based cybersecurity paradigm to
one that is risk-based and focusing on how to most effectively secure their implementation of cloud services.
GovCloud Network, LLC helps its clients develop and execute mission and business strategies to leverage the parallel and global nature of cloud-based services. We employ our technology, strategy, digital publishing and social media expertise across three lines of business- Business Strategy & Design, Digital Publishing & Social Media and Education.
Improving Cybersecurity and Resilience Through Acquisition Emile Monette GSAGovCloud Network
When the government purchases products or services with inadequate in-built “cybersecurity,” the risks created persist throughout the lifespan of the item purchased. The lasting effect of inadequate cybersecurity in acquired items is part of what makes acquisition reform so important to achieving cybersecurity and resiliency.
Currently, government and contractors use varied and nonstandard practices, which make it difficult to consistently manage and measure acquisition cyber risks across different organizations.
Meanwhile, due to the growing sophistication and complexity of ICT and the global ICT supply chains, federal agency information systems are increasingly at risk of compromise, and agencies need guidance to help manage ICT supply chain risks
@AgileCLoud_ICH Presentation - 20140521 US Navy OPNAV - Capt Christopher PageGovCloud Network
Assured C2 sets conditions for Navy commanders to maintain the IT- enabled ability to exercise C2 authorities across the sea, land, air, space, and cyberspace domains in heavily contested or denied operating conditions.
Navy must continue to clearly define and manage capability-based Assured C2 requirements and resources, and align those requirements and resources with JIE/IC ITE through the IDEA
The primary beneficiaries of the effort to deliver Assured C2 capabilities are the requirements stakeholders: USFF, USPACFLT, and USFLTCYBERCOM subordinate commanders who execute Navy’s warfighting mission in all domains.
Agile Cloud Conference 2 Introduction - John BrennanGovCloud Network
Develop and open and inclusive cloud service brokerage environment that provides the Government the capability for rapid acquisition of proven innovative technologies on a fee for service basis
To the maximum extent possible leverage what already exits versus custom development to include incorporation of industry standards and a consistent implementation environment
DoD Business Capability Lifecycle (BCL) Guide (Draft)GovCloud Network
BCL is tailored for the rapid delivery of enterprise business capability. It combines multiple, disjointed oversight processes into a single process. It recognizes that technology rapidly evolves and changes, and consequently, BCL mandates rapid capability delivery – within
eighteen months or less of program initiation. BCL is outcome-based, and modeled on best commercial practices. The process allows for the fact that not all solutions are purely technical. The entire DOTMLPF (Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership
and education, Personnel and Facilities) spectrum of potential solutions are considered.
Intrusion Detection on Public IaaS - Kevin L. JacksonGovCloud Network
Cloud computing is driving the business of information technology today.
“A recent Gartner survey on the future of IT services found that only 38 percent of all organizations surveyed indicate cloud services use today. However, 80 percent of organizations said that they intend to use cloud services in some form within 12 months, including 55 percent of the organizations not doing so today.“ (Gartner, Inc, 2013)
As companies rush to adopt cloud, however, information technology (IT) security sometimes seems to be an afterthought.
The goal of this paper is to provide a survey of the current state of IT security within public cloud infrastructure-as-a-service providers. After first providing a cloud computing overview, the paper will focus on the infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) deployment model, the typical home of IaaS intrusion detection components. The Gartner Cloud Use Case Framework will then be introduced as it will also serve as the framework for this survey. An in-depth review of public cloud intrusion detection studies, options and expert observations will then follow. The paper will then offer the authors conclusions and cloud computing IDS recommendations for enterprises considering a move to the cloud.
A Framework for Cloud Computing Adoption in South African GovernmentGovCloud Network
Technology adoption is always a critical concern in organizations (private and public). South African government experienced this encounter when adopted Open Source Software (OSS) with the objective to reduce ICT services costs among others. The implementation of OSS in SA government has faced several challenges such as user resistance, human factor, support and funding. As a result of these challenges cost reduction has not been fully achieved. Cost reduction issue ultimately affects implementation of other government programmes such as those who yields job creation, better education, and improving health, etc. The potential alternative to address the same objective as aimed by OSS is Cloud Computing adoption. Cloud Computing promise to offer the SA government more advantages OSS. This study explore the feasibility of Cloud Computing adoption as an alternative to enable cost reduction, effectiveness and efficient of IT services in SA government as was aimed by OSS initiative.
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...UiPathCommunity
💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™:
See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning
Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required
Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages
This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath.
Speakers:
👨🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath
👩🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Frank van Harmelen
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI is on the rise. However, simply machine learning on just any symbolic structure is not sufficient to really harvest the gains of NeSy. These will only be gained when the symbolic structures have an actual semantics. I give an operational definition of semantics as “predictable inference”.
All of this illustrated with link prediction over knowledge graphs, but the argument is general.
"Impact of front-end architecture on development cost", Viktor TurskyiFwdays
I have heard many times that architecture is not important for the front-end. Also, many times I have seen how developers implement features on the front-end just following the standard rules for a framework and think that this is enough to successfully launch the project, and then the project fails. How to prevent this and what approach to choose? I have launched dozens of complex projects and during the talk we will analyze which approaches have worked for me and which have not.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3
NCOIC Overview
1. Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium
Approved for Public Release
Distribution Unlimited
NCOIC-DefDailyPanel-KC20100611v2
2. NCOIC is a Unique Organization
NCOIC exists to facilitate the global realization of Network Centric Operations &
Net Enabled Capability. We seek to enable interoperability across joint, interagency,
intergovernmental, and multinational industrial & commercial operations.
Global Organization
Voice of industry & governments
Cadre of technical experts
Dedicated to interoperability
Advisory Council of senior advisors who help prioritize our work in
a non-competitive environment
In the photo: BrigGen Dieter Dammjacob (DEU AF)-J3 NATO Supreme Headquarters, Allied Powers Europe; Lt.Col. Danut Tiganus-CIS
Directorate, EU Military Staff; Dr. Tom Buckman-NC3A Chief Architect; Gen Harald Kujat,-German AF (Ret.) former Chief of Staff of German
Armed Forces & head of NATO Military Committee, Marcel Staicu-European Defense Agency NEC Project Officer .
3. NCOIC Members
80+ Member Organizations
Working Group collaboration
including leading IT and Aerospace
& Defense companies, government
organizations, non-governmental
organizations and academic
institutions
Members from 18 Countries
Advisors from 26 key stakeholders
from Australia, EDA, France,
Germany, Italy, NATO, The
Netherlands, Sweden, UK & US
Executive and Advisory Council joint meeting
Technical Council
Terry Morgan honors outgoing Advisory Council Chair, Keith Hall
4. Collaboration
NCOIC facilitates interoperability by collaboration
Member organizations & Advisory Council
Our member‘s customers
Agencies of global governments
Other NCO/NEC stakeholders
Collaboration occurs through
Invited Review of developing documents & architectures
Joint demonstrations and white papers
Joint and hosted forums, symposia and workshops
Joint technical development with stakeholders
LOI, LOA, MOU, CRADA and other agreements
Photo and screen captures from member lab
interoperability demonstration, Rome, May 2010
NCOIC provides guidance for network centric standards and their patterns of use.
5. Relationships
Government
– Australian Defence Organisation (ADO)
– Eurocontrol
– European Defence Agency
– NATO
• ACT
• NC3A
• NCSA
– Netherlands Command & Control Centre of Excellence
– Sweden Civil Aviation Authority (LFV)
– Sweden Defence Materiel Administration (FMV)
– US Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA)
– US Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
– US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
– US Joint Forces Command (JFCOM)
– US NAVAIR
– US SPAWAR
– OSD(NII)
Organizational
– Australia Defence Information & Electronic Systems Association (ADIESA)
2008 IDGA Award:
– NATO Industry Advisory Group (NIAG)
Outstanding Contribution
– OASIS to the Advancement
– World Wide Consortium for the Grid (W2COG) of Network Centric Warfare
6. Advisory Council
Gen (Ret) Harald Kujat, Chairman, NCOIC Advisory Council, Germany
Mr. Hakan Bergstrom, Swedish Ministry of Defence, Sweden
MGen. Georges D'Hollander, Director NHQC3S, Belgium
AVM Carl Dixon, RAF, Capability Manager (Information Superiority), United Kingdom
LGen. Pietro Finocchio, General Manager, Telecommunications, Information Technology, and
Advanced Technology, Italian MoD, Italy
Mr. Keith R. Hall, Advisory Council Chair Emeritus, United States
LGen Kurt Hermann, Director, NCSA, Germany
MGen Glynne Hines, NATO HQ C3, Canada
RADM Peter Jones, Head, Information and Technology Operations/Strategic J6 (CIOG)
Dr. Paul Kaminski, Advisory Council Chair Emeritus, former Undersecretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, United States
Dr. Robert Laurine, Chief Information Officer, NGIA, United States
Mr. Carlo Magrassi, Armaments Director, European Defense Agency, Italy
Mr. Mark T. Powell, U.S. Coast Guard Liaison to NCOIC, United States
Commodore Mark Purcell, Chief Architect & Director General Enterprise Architecture, Australia
LGen Jeffrey A. Sorenson, Chief Information Officer/G6, US Army, United States
MGen Guy Thibault, Assistant Chief of the Land Staff & Chief of Staff Assistant Deputy Minister
(Information Management), Canada
MGen Blandine Vinson-Rouchon, Director of S&T, DGA, France
MGen Jaap Willemse, ACT ACOS C4ISR & NNEC, Netherlands
Mr. Jack Zavin, DoD Associate Director, OASD (NII), United States
7. Sustained Effort to Make NCOIC Products
Part of Procurement Process
Overarching Goal: NCOIC deliverables are adopted, used and
required by customer agencies
Advise Participate Adopt Use
2004/2005 2006 2008 2009 2010
All Advisory NATO NATO C2COE NRF
– C3 IPT – NCAT
Council Members
– NCA FT USAF SPACECOM
DISA (US) – NCAT
US Defense – CRADA FAA/Eurocontrol
Science Board – OSWG – SCOPE/NCAT/Patterns
– NCAT – FAA OTA
OSD-NII (US) US DoD
– NCAT – Net-Centric
• US DOD/DAU
– OSWG Attributes • Aus DoD/RPDE
– Cybersecurity Australian DoD
FAA/JPDO (US) – SCOPE/NCAT
– Aviation IPT – Patterns/BBs
(NextGen/NEO) EDA
MOD (UK) – NCAT
NCOIC is Pursuing Plans to Further Increase Influence
in Future Procurements
8. NCOIC Key Deliverables
Addressing Inter-Agency, Cross-Industry Gaps
Systems, Capabilities, Operations, Programs, & Enterprises (SCOPE) Model
– Characterization of commercial, civil, and government requirements for interoperable systems
NCOIC Interoperability Framework™ (NIF) and Net-Centric Patterns
– Recommendations for open standards and their patterns of use to obtain interoperable systems
Building Blocks
– Catalog of COTS & GOTS open standards based products compliant with NIF recommendations
Network Centric Analysis Tool™ (NCAT)
– Netcentric analysis of system architectures, including System-of-Systems and Federation of
Systems architectures
NCOIC Lexicon
– A glossary of terms and definitions that lay the foundation for meaningful discussions. Provides
a common language for the disparity of ideas concerning key terms, including "NCO.―
Systems Engineering best practices and processes
– These best practices and processes include tools, process and maturity models, modeling
techniques, test & evaluation techniques, and collaborative environments for NCOIC integration.
These products, combined with NCOIC member expertise in NCO/NEC,
measure Netcentric capabilities, requirements, gaps
and provide recommendations for interoperability
9. Unity of Effort
Different Domains, Similar Needs
Aviation IPT C3 Interoperability Net Enabled Emergency Maritime
Response IPT IPT Cyber Security
IPT
IPT
Systems
Building Modeling and Engineering
Net- NCOIC Specialized Frameworks
Blocks Simulation and Integration
Centric Interoperability
Attributes Framework • Information Assurance
Coming Next • Test & Evaluation
• Cloud Computing
NIF & Concepts, • Mobile Networking • Lexicon
SCOPE
Principles, • System Management • Education
Processes, • Semantic Interoperability & Outreach
NCAT PATTERNS • Information, Services, etc.
Functional Teams provide the technical expertise to serve customer domains.
The Integrated Project Teams provide operational information from customer domain perspectives.
10. NCOIC and the
Cyberspace Ecosystem
NCOIC considers Interaction of People, Processes,
and Technology in a Net-Centric Environment
Cyber Security considerations are critical to the Processes People
successful use of Cyberspace in society!
Classic Information Assurance factors:
(for Systems, Services, Networks, Information, etc.
“Assured” at some Level of Trust) Technology
Assured Availability
Assured Integrity
Assured Authentication (& Identity Management)
Assured Confidentiality (& Authorization & Access Control)
Assured Non-Repudiation (& Forensic Audit Trails)
Security Management (People, Technology, Operations)
Multiple National Policies and Legal Constraints (many conflict!)
Many Domain-Specific needs and difference in priorities/emphasis!
Growing concern regarding dependence on Cyberspace with
corresponding vulnerability to attack, catastrophe, etc.
Interoperability of Global Cyber Security implementations across joint, interagency,
intergovernmental, and multinational industrial & commercial operations is key!
11. Traditional Security Mechanisms
Not Sufficient for Cyber Security
Some Traditional Security Mechanisms vs. Cyber Security Needs:
―Need to Know‖ vs. ―Need to Share‖
Point-to-Point Networks vs. Global Internet
Risk Adverse vs. Managed Risk
Tightly-coupled Systems/Networks vs. SOA / Cloud Computing
Public and/or Private Clouds providing Infrastructure-as-a-Service,
Platform-as-a-Service, Software-as-a-Service
Systems vs. System-of-Systems vs. Federation-of-Systems
Controlled vs. ad hoc composition and interaction
Key NCOIC Technical Topic at June and September Plenaries:
Authentication Methodologies: Current and Future (with emphasis on Internet)
Common & Domain-Specific Needs (to become SCOPE Dimensions)
Key Figures of Merit / Metrics (to become NCAT evaluation criteria)
Options for Solutions (to support Trade Studies and eventually NIF Patterns)
Role of Authentication in Identity Management on the Internet
14. Why NCOIC is Good for Business
Provides direct access to broad global customer base at the highest level,
and entrée to others through NCOIC relationships
Provides access to potential partners, suppliers and competitors for NCO
business
Illustrates global thought leadership & consensus with international
stakeholders on NCO/NEC
– No compromise of national or alliance interests
Industry consensus on NCO standards beneath the application layer
reduces cost, provides for more efficient design and effective partnering
Certification program will validate interoperability of systems within defined
parameters
―Like organizations that pioneered the Internet, NCOIC sponsors innovative thought,
conducts critical analyses, and demonstrates how a net-centric environment can
bring interoperability to a broad range of sectors. In this way, NCOIC helps member
companies to find new markets, evaluate their unique needs and explore ways to drive
interoperability into those markets.‖ Terry Morgan, Cisco.
15. Global Stakeholders
CDR Fred van Ettinger, (NLD N)
C2 Centre of Excellence, signs
Letter of Agreement with NCOIC
Members speak with Carlo Magrassi,
Members develop a SCOPE workshop for
European Defence Agency
Australian Department of Defence with Rapid
Armaments Director
Prototyping Development & Evaluation organization
“The Australian Department of Defence is a keen supporter of NCOIC, its principles and tools.
We aim to apply NCOIC‘s products to our acquisition process to better define interoperability
requirements and improve through-life systems integration prospects.‖ John McGarry,
Australian Air Commodore.
"We have used NCOIC‘s NCAT tool to assess levels of interoperability during NATO
Response Force exercises. Our Centre of Excellence found the tool to be very useful in
establishing the level of interoperability." Commander Fred van Ettinger, Section Head of
the Multi National Command and Control Centre of Excellence.
“NCOIC has four characteristics which make it unique. The organization is solely dedicated to
network-centric operations and interoperability; its membership stimulates discussions about
global interoperability; it serves as a ‗vendor neutral‘ forum, and it has a cadre of industry‘s top
technical experts who are available to do its work.‖ Jack Zavin, U.S. Office of the Assistant
Secretary of Defense, Networks and Information Integration.
16. Benefits of Membership
―From NCOIC members and senior government advisors, we continue to learn how to improve
the world we know today. And we are overwhelmed with opportunities to see the way network-
centric operations can shape the future.‖ USAF Lt.Gen. (Ret.) Harry Raduege, Chairman of the
Deloitte Center for Cyber Innovation.
―Consortium leaders gain insight about the direction of a customer‘s vision and the potential
network-centric business opportunity,‖ he says. ―They‘re in a better position to see the future, take
a hand in shaping it and place their company‘s bets on new solutions, more precisely.‖ Terry
Morgan, Cisco.
―People who operate in one market segment adopt a model about how the world works--that can
lead to a mental rut. But NCOIC members come from many sectors and have opinions that don‘t
always agree with your own. Within the context of such a collaborative environment, diverse
thinking can be a catalyst for innovation.‖ Hans Polzer, Senior Fellow, Lockheed Martin.
―Achieving interoperability among systems is huge work and there are national political barriers.
When NCOIC members work together as transnational companies these obstacles diminish—
even though the companies can only discuss non-sensitive issues— but they can focus on real
technical difficulties. NCOIC is then by far the best forum for ongoing conversations about
interoperability. Outside this forum, when national customers have more influence, such
collaboration would be much more difficult.‖ Dr. Claude Roche, EADS Defence & Security and
NCOIC Executive Council member.
―We are a global society and the next series of potential problems—civil wars, scarce water, food
shortages, pandemics, cyber warfare—cannot be resolved by one nation. To avoid catastrophic
outcomes our only chance is to cooperate. We have incredible motivation to work together and
NCOIC is making significant contributions to the technological foundation that will help nations
collaborate.‖ Brett Biddington, Cisco Systems’Global Government Solutions Group.
17. NCOIC Members
Tier 1 Members
Boeing Finmeccanica Northrop Grumman
Cisco Systems IBM Raytheon
Deloitte & Touche ITT Corporation Thales
EADS Lockheed Martin
Tier 2 Members
Harris Corporation
L-3 Communications
17
18. NCOIC Members
Tier 3 Members
ABG SPIN Federal Aviation Administration MITRE
ADIESA FOKUS NetCentOps, LLC
The Aerospace Corporation HAVELSAN NJVC
American Red Cross GBL Systems OASD (NII)/DoD CIO
ASELSAN Innovative Concepts, Inc. Object Management Group
Association for Enterprise Integration Intelligent Integration Objective Interface Systems
Australian Department of Defence Institute for Defense Analysis Open Geospatial Consortium
BAE Systems Interoperability Clearning House Real-Time Innovations
CACI International Data Links Society Rheinmetall Defence Electronics
Carillo Business Technologies Israel Aerospace Industries Rockwell Collins
Carnegie Mellon University SEI LFV RUAG Electronics
Center For Netcentric Product Research LinQuest Corporation Saab
Ciena Government Solutions Maritime Technology Centre R&D The SDR Forum
COMCARE Institute Solera Networks
Computer Sciences Corporation MBDA Technopôle Defence & Security
Dataline, LLC Microsoft Corporation TerreStar Networks
DCNS Military Communication Institute TUBITAK UEKAE
EDISOFT MilSOFT ICT University of Maryland HyNet
Emergency Interoperability Consortium MIT Lincoln Laboratory Wakelight Technologies
18
19. NCOIC Goal: Facilitate Implementation
of Network Centric Operations /
Net Enabled Capability
Members are
Global Leaders: Increase interoperability within and among systems involved in
Interagency and Multinational operations
Academic institutions
Aviation Service
Lower development costs and increase commonality of design in
providers
future systems – tailored standards and best practices
Defense suppliers
All military services
Multinational
Improve application readiness through more rapid fielding of network
Government agencies centric systems – leverage technical ―lessons learned‖
Human service agencies
Integrators
Reduce systems cost and sustainability through re-use and
Commercial systems commonality – facilitate ease of integration, upgrade, and support
Defense systems
IT firms Reduce Development Risk by identifying the common components
Communications
Data management needed for the network centric environment – Develop them where
Human-Machine interface
Information assurance
none exist
Service providers
Consulting Improve Application Effectiveness through new, more focused
Engineering development on domain specific capabilities
Logistics
Standards bodies
20. NCOIC Tools & Processes Allow for
Evaluation & Measurement Over
the Lifecycle of systems
―Although the applications domain is very diverse, integration problems across applications are similar. It‘s
interesting that we see a larger field of applications in NCOIC than we do, for instance, within the e-
Government sector. If we can learn from the experience of developers in diverse sectors and apply it to the
net-centric environment, that can open doors to new markets such as defense, homeland security and
emergency response.‖ Linda Strick, Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communication Systems.
―NCOIC‘s delicate alchemy fosters true collaboration among global companies that are often fierce business
competitors. Their efforts to resolve customers‘ interoperability issues recently resulted in the publication of
NCOIC‘s Interoperability Framework, a set of guiding principles for developers of network-centric systems,
products and services.‖ Nicholas Berthet, Thales Battlespace Transformation Centre.
21. Technical Council/Team Structure
Chair
Executive Sponsor: TC Recommendation Committee
Dan Starcevich (Raytheon) Ken Cureton (Boeing)
Vice Chair: Jim Burke (Lockheed Martin)
At-Large (membership) Sheryl Sizelove
(Boeing)
Chair Emeritus: Nicolas Berthet (Thales)
NIF Architecture Specialized Building Network Modeling and
Concepts FT Frameworks FT Blocks FT Centric Simulation FT
Mark Bowler Mikael Laby Jim Burke Attributes FT Dan Gregory
(Boeing) (EADS) (Lockheed Hans Polzer, (Thales)
William Ison Martin) (Lockheed Martin) Marco Picollo
(Lockheed Martin) Jack Zavin (US (Finmeccanica)
DoD)
Systems Engineering and Integration FT Al Nauda (Raytheon), John Reeves (Lockheed Martin)
NEER IPT: Ian McGraw, (PlantCML, an EADS North American comp), Hal St Clair (EADS)
C3 Interoperability IPT: Pascal Libert (EADS) Martin Hill (Thales),
Aviation IPT : Anton Walsdorf (EADS), Mary Ellen Miller,
Maritime IPT : Aymeric Bonnaud (DCNS), Will Kramer (BAE Systems)
Cyber Security IPT : Jessica Ascough (Harris), Chet Ratcliffe (EADS NA Defense Security and Systems Solutions Inc
22. Key Messages
NCOIC participation provides your business leaders direct personal contact with
the key global leaders of your customer base in an information sharing
environmen
NCOIC is analyzing mission threads and requirements to identify the
standards and patterns required for mission execution. Members create
opportunities to drive these standards and obtain early implementation insights.
NCOIC is engaging key government and civilian customers in identifying
standards. Members interact with customers in a non-procurement setting,
shaping requirements.
NCOIC is providing an architectural framework which allows COTS standards
to be used in NCO. This influence will guide how standards will be used in future
operations. Those who understand and help guide this framework will be better
equipped to consult on NCO utilization.
NCOIC assessment & analysis tools -- NCAT™ and SCOPE -- allow
customers to make accurate decisions on how to employ NCO capabilities.