My Philosophical Ideas 2 eBook Covers Topics on Medicine, Politics, Science & Philosophy

MY PHILOSOPHICAL IDEAS 2
Antonio Pinto Renedo
© Author, layout and cover design:
Antonio Pinto Renedo
Published in April 2016
Revised in 2019

INDEX
CHAPTER 1 - MEDICINE
Tips flu
Tips against migraines
The children
Order and hobby
Defect or disease
CHAPTER 2 - POLICY
Freedom of opinion
Germany's dilemma
Religion and race
Islamist extremism
The inertia of the masses
Military inertia
Citizens' parties
False environmentalists
The absurdity of fashion
Hippies
Law and Justice
Decent politicians
Asymmetric society
Subhuman
The last war
CHAPTER 3 - SCIENCE
Genuine art
The Flood
The evolution of Homo sapiens
The New Year
The order in the couple
Bipolarity of the cosmos
Total justice and exceptions
The pyramid of knowledge
The rigidity of the universe
Circles of evolution

CHAPTER 4 - FILOSOFÍA
The devil does not exist
The guardian angels
The false god
The true concept of God
The new idols
The essence of happiness
False philosophy
The loneliness of a philosopher
Vanity of sects
Impostors
Poverty and dignity
Personality of Jesus
A new Christianity
The doubt
The inner sun
The final contact

FOREWORD
This book represents the second part of the items shown in my
blog (The road to the new era) once gathered a certain amount of
them I turned into PDF and get on the Internet so they can be
downloaded for free. The truth is that the reason life is obtaining
happiness and not getting money, because money can help but
does not guarantee it. The main objective of these publications is
primarily encourage free dissemination of ideas and encourage
readers accustomed to think freely, without submitting to the
topics of each era.
This book has been translated from the original Spanish version.

CHAPTER 1 - MEDICINE
FLU TIPS
Few people know that in fact the flu does not need any
medication to cure because it is the immune system itself that
heals us, it is nevertheless true that the difference between healing
is quick and easy or slow and difficult it can depend on how we
treat it. Here I propose some tips that I think are useful. First a
measure that I consider advisable not to spend the duration of the
illness in bed, because even bother not why we canceled as
people, the horizontal position may favor the onset of fever and
headache with increasing pressure blood in the brain, also causes
an imbalance in sleep rhythms making it more difficult to sleep at
night, right is being horizontally alone at night. It is also useful to
combat the disease avoid possible cough, infection usually attacks
among other body parts throat, but the more you cough more
irritated and cough worsens, is only useful cough when phlegm
formed in the coughing and breathing tube is then suitable means
expel, it is also recommended nose blowing gently to avoid
breakage of fine blood vessels that are found in it. Another useful
measure is to avoid excessive temperatures in homes, it
contributes to increasing fever and also dries the airways, it is also
helpful to avoid excessive shelter, especially in the afternoon that
is when the fever rises. Another useful measure is to avoid over-
medication, as usually is our own immune system that heals us,
why rush into taking medications can be a hindrance rather than a
solution. Fever in mild form may also be useful, as it increases
body temperature causing blood is more fluid, besides
inflammation often associated increases the diameter of the veins
allowing the arrival of more blood to the infected area and
therefore helping more antibodies to fight infection, so it is
advisable to use anti-inflammatory only in case of high fever. It is
also useful to do some form of exercise during illness, as this
apart from strengthening our body stimulates blood circulation.
One of the symptoms that may indicate the onset of flu is the

sense of smell of burning caused by virus activity in the olfactory
glands or changes in the way we perceive the flavors.
TIPS AGAINST MIGRAINES
In fact, many headaches are caused by allergies, so it is necessary
to be informed whether you are experiencing one with the aim of
preventing allergies to pollen or dust are well known but one that
may go unnoticed is allergy moisture, this allergy begins with
inhalation of steam, this steam burn the skin overlying the sinuses
causing a small infection, in order to promote blood flow and
eliminate the infection, the body causes an increase in the size
veins that connect the nose to the brain resulting in fever and
headache. Nasal symptoms of this infection can be confused with
cutting digestion, because the dilated veins in the brain
compresses other vessels may cause loss of vision, memory or
feeling of paralysis of the left side of the face. Water vapor could
also explain some cases of asthma or pneumonia, because being
exposed to it in excess could encourage spore or virus attack our
lungs.
THE CHILDREN
It is a misconception that children are people without importance,
because it is in that part of life when they acquire their
personality, even in the stage of babies is important not to forget
about them and actively participate in their education, parents
should provide their legs catching them children in their arms to
show them things, because although they can not walk their
vision and memory capacity are widely developed. It is also
necessary that parents are best friends and play with them, that it
should not be seen as an effort for children give the same care
they receive.
The good thing about children is that when they are young have
not yet acquired the prejudices that are common in an adult,
because there have been prejudices at all times, sometimes result
from ignorance, and other manipulation of the facts so interested,
the problem is that real few prejudices are sometimes considered

as such at the time in which they have and only later recognized,
therefore it is important to analyze things objectively trying to
avoid drawing hasty conclusions, i.e. what today it is considered
an adult personality is the result of assimilating many wrong but
practically forced acceptance by the mass social beliefs.
Adults should learn from children the joy of living, because
regardless of how old you are, every day is a new opportunity to
be happy, as our body allows us must do whatever we want
within our means.
It should also take into account the views of children, because
although they have less knowledge than adults does not stop
having feelings or they can be right sometimes, for no one for
many knowledge you have can know everything besides talking
to them and listen to their views is positive in its development.
A child is a person not a cabinet and when it is small has a great
desire to learn, but it's as if you were at the bottom of a dark pit in
which only light at the end is why adults should help them
directed towards the light, giving them the knowledge they lack to
be adults.
ORDER AND MANIA
In all activities of life would be desirable to establish an order to
things done more effectively, the order consists of performing the
tasks in an hour or so preset is not only a tool to facilitate the
smooth running of tasks but it is also good for health as a
continuous change of customs hampers farsighted ability of our
body, a good practice would be for example sleep seven or eight
hours a day and these hours of wakefulness and sleep were the
same and the same hours both weekdays and holidays. Another
positive measure would not interject holidays in the middle of
working days, this would lengthen life and improve health. It is
also true that abuse the development of customs can be
counterproductive, it is what is called compulsive or hobby
activity, this behavior can have two main causes, one is caused by
a deterioration of health, and the other occurs as result of nerve
pressure and stress. This means that when a methodical and
organized person by nature is subjected to great pressure, tends

unconsciously to exaggerate customs in order to leave more free
mind and increase your concentration before the possible
occurrence of these unforeseen problems that cause stress. While
it is true that excess in the planned customs is inadequate, it is
also true that perform daily activities in an orderly manner
reduces errors, increases concentration on tasks, and can increase
the available memory capacity, being automatic, provided many
of the usual processes.
DISEASE OR VICE
Today it is very common that any deviation will end by calling
disease, this is because we live in a very competitive society in
which no one wants to consider loser, why, it'll hide the vices
presenting them as alleged diseases. An example is the
increasingly widespread practice of using food as mere
entertainment, as a result of obesity, in fact, it appears in
developed countries this is already the qualifier epidemic. It is
true that there are some people with a genetic predisposition to
gain weight, but this predisposition does not require them to eat
more than necessary, but acts to increase the feeling of hunger.
Therefore, it is clear that only with dietary control can prevent
overweight and vice hide behind the illness is not exactly a very
healthy behavior.
Another example is the use of alcohol or drugs often this ends in
the development of an addition, but to keep the good name now
drunk sick call themselves, however, is an act of hypocrisy appear
before all as alleged sick, but at the same time they forget that this
addition was the consequence of vice of drinking beyond what the
body could bear, but recognize that of course would stain his
good name. Society should not make the mistake of collaborating
in that vice presenting him as alleged illness disguising, because
all additions are the result of a defect developed for a long time
and although it is true that this defect causes an addition is also
true that the origin of this addition are the bad habits. Moreover,
any can be eliminated if the substance is gradually reduced the
causes. Society should not make the mistake of covering up the
habit, much less accept the existence of mitigating for those who

commit crimes while under the influence of drugs, because the
only way to eradicate such behavior is precisely not protecting
them when their vices hurt innocent.

CHAPTER 2 - POLICY
FREEDOM OF OPINION
It is pathetic to see that when the media talk about freedom of
opinion generally refer to the freedom to indulge the line marked
by the great powers, this is because as soon as someone gets out
of those parameters you are immediately accused of being
antisocial and words are invented to associate your opinion with
diseases in order to discredit him. Actually, these people are just
opportunists who sail to are current and always associated with
the power of his time these if they are traitors to humanity,
because it is assumed that every idea should be respected
provided that raise peacefully, but when someone leaves the
truths established by the powers that arise quickly voices calling
for them to tape the mouth. Could it be that they fear citizens to
express their right to think freely? These who speak of freedom of
expression, but only when it favors what they want, are no better
than those who burned scientists to tell the truth during the
Middle Ages.
And I say this about those who today persecute those who oppose
condescend to the mixing of races or homosexuality, once
invented words like xenophobia and homophobia in order to
prevent citizens from entering assess the following facts
objectively, they are not able to understand that respect is not the
same work, and the fact that one respects those who support
homosexuality does not mean it's right, and therefore not obliged
to cooperate with it. But these opportunists just hope the prize to
go in line with the great empire of the United States, that empire
which speaks of human rights and at the same time allows for
millions of poor in the streets, usually of ethnic minorities, the
miscegenation empire that supports only to justify the occupation
of the rest of the world and refuses to recognize racial boundaries
so as not to recognize the policies. It is true that the Nazis were
cruel to ethnic minorities during World War II, but that does not
mean we should therefore destroy our own racial and cultural
heritage through crossbreeding. All races are entitled to live in

freedom, but that does not mean the interbreeding help to this end
but on the contrary, today it is taboo to talk about this issue, the
pro miscegenation say it is wrong to oppose the crossing of races
because they say they are all part of the same species, but. If the
case of discovering a human species most backward on a desert
island it would also maintain the barbarous pretense of allowing
the crossing of this with today's humanity and thereby destroy the
fruit of thousands of years of genetic progress? Because they
would oppose recognizing that differences in racial progress are
possible, and therefore reject miscegenation is defensible without
this implying a desire to harm the other races. So I consider it a
mistake to oppose those who advocate peacefully rejection
miscegenation or racial superiority, because this wave of support
for the current crossbreeding does not pursue more than pandering
to a new imperialism that seeks to justify claiming that his
rejection of Nazi legitimizes them but actually only pursues the
same imperialist aims. also they are mistaken who simply limited
to condescend and justify Nazism in the Second World War,
because that kind of ideology can only evolve if they are able to
get away proposed by Hitler and recognize the right of all races to
live freely approach, as the only used the movement for the
defense of racial integrity because he believed he could further
their nationalist interests, but that does not mean that that line of
thinking is in itself bad, the Nazis actually only sought power and
create in Germany a dictatorship and did not hesitate to lie and
use anything that might put them favor, they were carried away
by extremism and that was a big mistake, but that does not mean
why were wrong at all, as the victorious powers wanted us to
believe . The big mistake that was made after the Second World
War was to believe that the defense of humanism and respect for
racial rights necessarily implied acceptance of miscegenation, and
such is not true.
In fact, every race is different because of their adaptation to
different climates of the earth, and only for this reason it is
justified to oppose the mixing of them, but it is also necessary to
say that it is precisely these harsh climates causing existence best
and worst races, because perfection is the result of finding the
right balance in everything and the racial question the European

race represents that balance by having developed in the most ideal
climate. In the future, all races will end up being the same, but not
by exterminations, nor by interbreeding, but because the result of
the evolution of these will come a day when the progress of cities
will create an ideal climate in all of them and consequently
stimulate the development of the races to make them equal, but
until that time comes it is absurd to destroy the racial
miscegenation heritage. It is necessary to foster fraternal
coexistence among all races, but that does not mean it's right that
these are mixed. The progress of mankind is based on progress
from chaos to order, from darkness to light, and that will only be
possible if the decision of nature to divide mankind into different
races is respected, since this division also represents progress.
THE DILEMMA OF GERMANY
It is regrettable to see how today the Germans are divided
between those who are in favor of the victorious powers of the
Second World War and therefore against Nazism, and who
declare themselves against the victors of the war and
consequently in favor of the Nazis, as both positions are wrong.
There are many people who think that the only way to defend
freedom is supporting the Nazis without understanding that it was
precisely these that gave their country to foreign powers, praising
Hitler as if God were considered unpatriotic to anyone who
criticizes him but if you care to know history are taken realize that
Hitler was no military genius they believe, their only success
during the war was the conquest of France, for everything else
were failures and their alleged successes were actually
concessions Western nations gave in order to avoid war, but its
policy was completely erratic. His first big mistake was to attack
England without sufficient means, attempting a sea blockade
when had a fleet far below his, and when it became clear his
failure attacked Russia in order to cover it up, this was from a
strategically military barbarity, for violating the peace treaty was
signed with her country condemned to certain failure by putting
all major nations against him. If Hitler had stopped the war at that
time, probably he would have ended, but his unlimited desire for

power led him to perdition. It is true that the conditions of the
Versailles Treaty that ended World War I favored the rise of
Nazism, but it is also true that the Nazis had not come to power
without the economic crisis of 1929, but it is necessary to
consider that Crisis affected not only Germany but the whole
world. The Nazis used a strong campaign of mental manipulation
in order to convince citizens that they understand them and be
able to solve their problems. By putting the Jews as allegedly
responsible for all the evils they were used as a means for society
could vent their discomfort with them, blaming a minority
supported by the remaining majority, so thus ensured the society
did not realize that the danger was in them and did not realize that
Hitler's hatred of Jews simply was because he did not consider
them sufficiently nationalists for supporting these peace treaty in
the first world war. Another reason for the persecution against
them was the economic motive, because by putting them outside
the law could seize their possessions. The Nazis accused Jews of
being better off financially than the rest of the Germans, but they
did not say is that it was precisely the European laws of the
Middle Ages which provoked it, because for a long time forbade
Christians to work in banking and make loans, such
discrimination in favor of the Jews were the Europeans
themselves an example of those who favored economic myopia
that antipathy toward them.
The truth is that if a comparison of the results is made Germany
was better placed at the end of the First World War to the end of
the second, so if you have to look unpatriotic obviously that
would have to be Hitler, for his disastrous policies he condemned
his country to ruin. Militarism is not always the solution, the pro-
Nazi should note that the allied nations against Hitler awarded
him almost everything he asked in order to avoid war and yet he
was determined to provoke therefore evident his total ignorance
of the possibilities that his country had to win the war. Those who
today defend the thesis Nazis have to understand that criticizing
Hitler is not the same as criticizing Germany and be against Hitler
does not imply being against Germany because Hitler can make
mistakes like other people. To progress must understand this truth
and therefore have to be willing to make a self-criticism and

change those things that are wrong in their ideology. It is essential
to accept that defend their race does not have to be linked to abuse
others. Actually the Nazis did not invent philosophy towards
racial integrity, because he existed before them, but they served
this ideology only because they believed that could favor their
nationalist ideas, therefore the fact defend these ideas does not
imply that have to agree with the necessarily Nazi.
Also are despicable who say everything about the Nazis is bad,
because nobody is wrong in all, frivolously hidden in the
Versailles Treaty conditions for Germany were excessively harsh,
and the desire of the Nazis to unite all territories German culture
under one banner was legitimate, but the mistake of the Nazis did
not know how to find the right measure to things, because his
desire for power was unlimited as demonstrated when they locked
themselves in jail his political opponents turning the country into
a dictatorship. Nor was nothing wrong with the fact of wanting to
defend their race against miscegenation, because for many
German and European race was a symbol of identity that had to
also defend for the Germans it had special meaning because after
the Romans tried to conquer the Germanic territories in the time
of emperor Octavian he distrusts the West was higher, and
defending race served to reinforce their own identity. In addition,
before the war to keep the pure race was considered by all as a
symbol of good education and only after the German defeat this
changed, because from that moment those who were defending
racial purity automatically were considered pro-Nazi and
therefore enemies of the victorious powers of war, as if it were the
same thing can be against miscegenation but also against the
Nazis, they forget that before the outbreak of the difficult war was
to find someone who openly support miscegenation, be in favor
of keeping the race pure or believe that a race may be more
evolved than another does not mean for it being in favor of
slavery or the mistreatment of other races, as happened with the
Nazis. It is commonly accepted by all that the human species is
superior to other animal species, but defend this does not mean
that therefore the extermination of other species rests, therefore
argue that the white race is more evolved than the rest of races
also have to involve the abuse of these rests, as each plays a role

in the earth and each must evolve peacefully and in freedom. It is
actually adapting to different climates in some extreme cases what
determines the differences between them and why they are
necessary, but this adaptation is also because the European race is
better and more beautiful to be found in the tract of land with a
more balanced climate. It is also important to note that the fact
that a race can be considered superior to another does not mean
that therefore every individual of the most advanced race has to
be considered better than each individual of the other races,
because it is only the evolutionary value means what that
changes. Racial differences is on aesthetics where more
accentuated, but that does not mean you have to be significant
differences in other things like the level of intelligence for
example, this does occur however when it comes to different
species. Perhaps, eventually, all races become equal when the
man with his technological advances manages to create an
identical artificial climate in cities that do evolve, but in the
meantime, crossbreeding is an act of genetic anarchy and
mockery of the natural order. At present the white race is causing
their own extinction by refusing to take the seed needed to replace
its inhabitants and to promote racial miscegenation, this really is a
true crime against humanity, but few want to acknowledge so as
not question the preset topics.
After the war the Americans and French used their alleged
support of miscegenation to justify their imperialist campaigns,
claimed that the fact of allowing miscegenation within its borders
gave them the right to invade the territories of other races, so did
the opposite of what they were proposing, i.e. invade and exploit
those territories, according to them for their sakes, when he
moved them truly was greed, as in the invasion of Iraq, which lies
to justify it were used and so to appropriate its oil, it is true that
democracy is better than dictatorship, but that can not be used as
an excuse to do whatever they want and destroy a country, every
nation must be respected so that it can evolve by itself without
pretentiousness impositions, plus such interference only they
serve to give ammunition to extremist groups. With these
behaviors condemn the West to lose their culture just by the
desire for more money, as if they had no ethical value. Thus

creating greater social tension by trying to impose racial mixtures
but without really worrying about human rights. I just would
return to reason and give each ethnic minority territory within the
United States by the percentage that corresponded and that each
race can thus create their own free nation. Ideally worldwide
racial boundaries were respected, to avoid the risk that some races
may interfere in the affairs of others. But that can only happen
when you assume that interbreeding does not help humanity, but
promotes the exploitation of some races over others besides
destroying the identity of each race.
It is necessary that those who believe in the defense of racial
integrity dissociate completely from the Nazi era and understand
that the defense of one's own race does not have to be in
contradiction with respect for the rights of others. Nor should we
forget that the first casualty of war is truth loser, its successes are
considered flaws and defects winner are considered virtues, it is
necessary to analyze things impartially, without being carried
away by the comfortable opportunism of seeing things only for
those who win wars, because they may have the power but not the
reason.
Actually, not that the power and media change the feelings of
people, what changes is the way people think should express
these feelings, making power is to direct these feelings towards
their own interests by changing the interpretation of the facts are
historical or scientific, for this reason after the war Nazi crimes
were considered inhumane acts, but the Indian extermination in
the United States a legitimate act of self-defense, all about how to
raise the facts rather than the facts themselves, even in cases
involving similar situations. Is the same mental manipulation
which was then used to justify the Iraq war. These governments
use both lying and intimidation to achieve their ends, and many
citizens tend to agree with them only out of fear, and therefore
accept their arguments without analyzing impartially, so the
concept of what is prejudice and what It not simply depends on
what determine the dominant powers of the time. Much blame for
this social confusion lies with the speculators who during the war
supported the Nazis and now fervent defenders of miscegenation
declare, because such people do not seek the truth, only to profit

harming society. People should ask what would have been his
values to win the war the Germans would surely be very different,
because it is not the same as saying it is fair to really be, the real
challenge is to be able to seek the truth staying out ideological
fashions of the times, because all power no matter how great
carries a baggage of the same mistakes that hit, and this must
know how to recognize. Someday reach a new time when people
will no longer accept leadership represented by justice and truth.
RELIGION AND RACE
Since the end of the Second World War the discussion on the
preservation of racial and cultural identity of each people became
a taboo subject, but it is important to remember that even in the
essence of the Christian religion there is a clear tendency to
oppose miscegenation of races. It is pathetic to see how society
considers as natural defend the existence of all varieties of each
animal species, yet since the end of World War II is pursued
proponents preservation of human races without mixing, and all
because who he lost that war proposed such ideas. Is it that you
are so naive to believe that whoever loses has to be wrong war at
all? It pursues only one goal which is to consolidate and elevate
the winner, which promotes mixing only in order to show
different from the Nazis, but that his real intention is to hide while
carrying out its own campaign of world domination. You need to
understand that each race is the answer to the adaptation of the
human species every climate of the earth. They forget that even in
the same biblical tradition condemning such practices as
abhorrent, but now this truth is muted. Because confused to
defend racial identity does not have to involve desire no evil to
others. They forget that it was nature itself which divided
mankind into different races and are actually different although
many insist on denying it. Because there is nothing dishonest in
trying to maintain their own race without mixing and the fact that
a person who believes in these ideas has committed a dishonest
act does not imply that all those who have these ideas also are.

You shall not sow your vineyard two kinds of seed; because all be
unclean, sowing seed which the product of the vineyard.
(Deuteronomy 22.09)
It is true that it is wrong to assess the content of the Bible without
making constructive criticism, as much that this book can be
appreciated for its moral content, that's not a reason to stop using
our own reasoning, especially if we that its supposed divine origin
is somewhat alleged but not proven, as well as any changes that
eventually these writings may have suffered.
But it is also true that anyone who now defends peacefully is
morally right to maintain their own race without mixing is
immediately silenced for not being in line with the prevailing
power of the moment and that is also an opportunist act against
freedom.
It is also important to emphasize that racial differences are
primarily the result of the adaptation of each race to different
climates of the earth and the fact that this adaptation determined
that some races may be better than others, it should not be used as
a pretext for pretend to have advantage over others because
although the mixing can be considered a mistake, that does not
change the fact that we are all human beings with the same right
to be happy and to live in freedom.
ISLAMIST EXTREMISM
It is striking to see how the extremist Islamic groups show an
increasing cruelty, and it is also striking that the number of
supporters of these terrorist groups seems to gradually increase, it
is unfortunate that this happens because their ideological
approaches are manifestly contrary to respect for human rights
and freedom of expression, i.e. are generally the worst elements
of society who end up forming such groups and their ambition for
power seems limitless.
However it is also necessary to remember that it is the greedy
Western policy towards the Muslim world the main driver of
these groups, as systematically whenever the UN poses a sanction
against Israel for its policy of occupation and extermination of the

Palestinian people United States blocks it, when Israel kills its
bombing hundreds of Palestinians most of them are civilians the
Western world considers a simple news story, but when an
Islamic terrorist group kills a Western all scandalized by saying it
is an act against freedom and fraternity. Do they mean that the life
of a Muslim is irrelevant, but an Israeli or an American not? The
United States wants to show to the world how a judge and Lord
impartial. But how fair you can consider who slaughters a million
Iraqis leaving the country destroyed, claiming to seek weapons of
mass destruction when they know perfectly well that do not exist?
Because what they really wanted was to control its oil while
providing nuclear weapons to Israel, in addition to finance his
army, even knowing that this country takes decades illegally
occupying Palestinian territory. At the end gives the impression of
being true to say Islamist groups that we are witnessing a new
covert crusade, because US policy is to provide all necessary
means for Israel to steal more and more territories to the Islamic
world through their settlements, and if a war is declared to have
the possibility of exterminating their nuclear weapons, i.e. it can
be assumed that the United States prefers to be Jews rather than
Muslims who control the territories considered religious
significance for Christians, but this It shows that in any case its
policy has nothing impartially and continuous source of conflict
between the Islamic world and the West. But the most unfortunate
thing is that Israel is using the Palestinian people with the same
policy of extermination that the Nazis used against them. Do they
not learned anything from what happened in the Second World
War? And if not so, why not return freedom to the occupied
territories? The Western world is losing this issue a great
opportunity to demonstrate freedom and fraternity that both
preaches. It is true that extremists seek to impose the world a
mentality of the stone age of modern times, but the saddest thing
of all is that those countries the forefront of progress believe that
cruelty to the world Islamic they are favoring the rise of such
groups, they are causing the citizens of those countries confuse
extremism freely.
INERTIA MASSES

It is regrettable to see how the masses tend to have a single
thought, it's like they do not want the trouble of analyzing things
to have an evolved opinion. From the moment an idea or
ideological current becomes assumed by most seem as if a mental
black hole that tends to attract people to him preventing such
abandon dogma was formed. But worst of all is that when
someone tries to move away from such beliefs hyenas of society
i.e. speculators are poured over attacking them mercilessly, these
speculators interpret that departure as an opportunity to take
advantage by distancing these people the truths or beliefs
politically accepted by the majority, then speculators appear to
others as supposed defenders of the mass when in fact only seek
personal gain. These kinds of people do not seek the truth and are
characterized in each period for trying to take advantage of the
political spurts always going with the flow, they are the same as
during the Nazi era extolled the regime and from the end of the
war vigorously they pursued those who defended racial purity
peacefully. Speculators were also those who supported McCarthy,
who in the United States, tried to obtain political advantage
scaring citizens against those who merely exercised their right to
think differently. Another example is the ideological rigidity of
political parties in this system misnamed democracy, since
different ideas to the dogmas of the initial orthodoxy are
persecuted so that they end up considering that the members of
each party have to take their postulates as set in stone, turning the
rough parties have unable to progress adequately. Just as you try
to manipulate the minds of his followers that it is said that all the
evils correspond to the opposition parties and all the virtues to
himself. This will not end until society realizes that it is necessary
to pass from voting parties to vote on ideas. Another similar
example is religious dogmas, the leaders of such organizations
proclaim the infallibility of its principles to create a mental
dictatorship, pretending to citizens who think freely is an attack
against God or religion, but do not say it what matters is less good
or truth and only used such arguments to their advantage, making
believe that citizens doubt the dogma is wrong. These rascals
pretend representatives considered only serve God when Satan,

and intended to consider the truth as an exclusively his property
without room for any difference of opinion. People should look at
things objectively and unmask those speculators who scare people
with lies and thus achieve a truly free society.
The world has become a great facade in which the important thing
is not democracy but pretend that there is democracy, what
matters is not justice but to pretend that there is justice. But you
can not solve this without assuming a certain amount of self-
criticism, because in reality a country always has the government
it deserves, because the low moral disposition of the political
class is merely the symptom of poor moral mood of the society It
is representing and in many cases have voted for him.
MILITARY INERTIA
It is regrettable to see how the great nations tend to lean too easily
to war and imperialism, an example of this is seen in the
excessive tendency of the United States to seek wars with which
to pay for arms companies by major economic support received
during election campaigns. When these parties funded enterprises
came to power arms they return the favor provoking wars to
justify military spending.
At the beginning of the Cold War the United States considered
appropriate allying with Israel in its confrontation with the Soviet
Union for world domination and that resulted in many of the
Islamic countries became enemies to be at odds with Israel's
policy theft of land to the Palestinians and Islamic countries
became a field to create appropriate test to justify wars with arms
spending.
On the other hand the United States was fixated on creating a
circle of allied countries around Russia with which to strangle his
influence, hence its interest attract the governments of the Baltic
and Ukrainian republics, also carried out a policy of continuous
interference in the internal policies of the countries of the middle
East using the pretext that only wanted to impose democratic
models for their sake, but could not hide their interest in
mastering their internal policy to assist and control the oil
business.

After that, it went to fund Islamist guerrillas to overthrow
governments that were not favorable to them in Afghanistan and
Syria without considering that these guerrillas derive in many
cases anti-Western terrorist groups.
After the destruction of Iraq in the two Gulf wars this country was
so weak he could not contain the entry of terrorist groups such as
the Islamic state, in a way also funded by the US to overthrow the
Syrian government, and all this not for promote democracy but to
take support Russia in its fight for world domination. For this
reason I believe the recent policy towards the Middle East by the
United States is a serious mistake because Islamic countries have
the perception that only a relationship with them arises through
force and intimidation, while Israel is allows land theft and
destruction of Palestinians finally after all are Muslims.
CITIZEN HOLIDAYS
Formerly, the city councils of people regularly organized parties
because of the difficulty of citizens to make them individually
today in modern cities there are plenty of nightclubs prepared for
it. For this reason, it is incomprehensible that municipalities
frequently blocked with normal activity of cities to organize
parties, because it represents a clear violation of citizens' rights to
rest and silence. It is regrettable that human beings store both
doing things en masse, as if responding to a hypnotic pulse that
forces you to do, condescends to the shows organized by
municipalities even knowing that they are nothing more than a
display of alcohol and consumerism. This behavior resembles
more a herd of wildebeest in the jungle a group of intelligent
people. The same goes for the fireworks, it is surprising that the
population be interested something that is essentially nothing
more than a simple succession of more like a bombing explosions
at a party, especially if we consider that there is a part of the
population such as young children or animals are cruelly
tormented by these explosions without anyone seems to care.

Therefore, it is reasonable that society applies in this issue some
sanity and decides to perform noisy activities only in the
soundproof rooms created for it. Municipalities have a duty to be
neutral and refuse to turn the streets into simple taverns or
nightclubs, albeit temporarily, their duty is to consider public
health and the rights to rest as their priorities and not mere profit
motive that these scandals represent. An evolved society is
characterized by knowing that the interests of one party does not
have to impose on others.
THE FALSE ENVIRONMENTALISTS
Today we are used to seeing many environmentalists
demonstrations but how many of those environmentalists
assumptions prove with facts and not just with words? Because it
is very easy to accuse politicians of all, but it is more difficult to
prove what they say with facts.
How many of those attending the demonstrations continually buy
clothes that do not need and then throw the used and still in good
condition, or torn clothes are bought when it would be more
logical to buy new and abrade with use?
How many of them abuse the food, while there are so many
hungry people in the world? These people have already
discovered the pleasure of eating, now have to discover the
pleasure of eating only what is necessary, because that is also an
art.
How many of them throw food simply by not repeating the same
thing the next day?
How many of them despise the sunlight coming day and sleeping
at night?
How many of them live at home with their parents and even
taking work refuse to help with expenses or household chores and
spend everything you earn in useless vices? If you have the same
compassion for their parents than they have for their pets the
world would be much better.

How many of them use the car to take a person, when it would be
much more environmentally friendly use public transportation?
How many of them catch the car to go to town every weekend,
even knowing the great pollution that will cause? Because a car
consumes in each of those trips as much oxygen as it spends a
human being in his life. It will always be more logical and clean
stroll through the city park.
How many of them collect garbage when they eat in the field or
the beach?
How many of them live in cities with dogs and have no qualms
about allowing dirty streets with urine and feces? It will always
be more logical to have children and not dogs and animals return
to nature which is where they belong instead of living as mere
slaves of people.
It is clear that many of those who call themselves
"environmentalists" are nothing but a whited sepulchres who
looks very nice in the pictures out of newspapers insulting
politicians when they should be a thorough analysis of self-
criticism. They do not understand that the world is in a state of
decline precisely because people do not like to think, much less
change. Apparently they believe is much better look at the speck
in your neighbor's eye but forget the beam in their own.
THE ABSURDITY OF FASHIONS
It is sad to see so many people dominated by the obsession to
look cool and the worst is that often that fashion is not followed
by choice but by not contradict most, because in fact the main
reason for people to follow it is fear. Fads are not very different
from the group to use the same customs or the same jackets
tattoos, usually those who join these groups follow fads or what
they want is to feel safe protected by the mass of people acting the
same way. The trouble is when fashion dominates people and not
people to fashion, because then the barbarous traditions that still
exist today as sexual mutilation or torture and auto other
ridiculous as wearing torn clothing or using occur tie, although
infinity that exist because many people when deciding whether to
do something just set in whether it is fashionable or not, because

when they believe that a habit is common to think that joining she
found herd protected by the same group that uses its symbols. I do
not mean here that this evil have common customs or similar
clothing, what is objectionable is as usual habit especially among
young people to do something only function is fashionable and
not their common sense, because in doing so only favor the
development of absurd customs.
THE HIPPIES
It would be desirable to think that the hippies were a peace
movement as they normally tend to believe, but the truth is that
the movement and the Vietnam War have a direct relationship,
because the alleged pacifism attributed to them is nothing more
than a rejection reaction to participate in a war that anyway had
little social support, because this was not a defensive but clear
aggression against a foreign country war and therefore it was
logical that many citizens opposed to risk their lives in that war or
accept forced recruitment. The truth is that the hippies were just a
bunch of degenerates and promiscuous drug addicts who simply
proclaimed themselves pacifists only in order to avoid
participating in the war, thus ended once this movement also
disappeared. These types of groups or sects are the ideal breeding
ground for fraudsters who only seek evil try to get a role they do
not deserve, presented to others as pacifists and say preach the
good when they carry within more than selfishness and lust for
power. These undesirable sex call it love because what they want
is sex and no love when they are two very different things, can
have sex but love is not the same as they would have us believe.
LAW AND JUSTICE
Usually it tend to think that law and justice are the same but such
a thing is a mistake because the law should do justice but it is not
always the case, because the law primarily represents the interests
of the government that is not always in line with the interests of
the citizen. An example of this is in the dry law enacted in the
United States in the early twentieth century with the law it was

supposed to promote public health but back to the views of
citizens. This means that instead of convincing society of the
harmful use of alcohol, they chose to threaten and coerce
sanctions, this caused a rift between the government and citizens
who disregarded this requirement. As a result, there was a great
development of mafias and illegal alcohol market. One could say
then that the expansion of mafia organizations rather than being
merit of them is the consequence of the lack of respect for the rule
to civil rights, because in some ways represent the right of society
to exercise their free will and so both these illegal companies
were doing justice to offer people what the state forbade them
arbitrarily, therefore in this case the classic definition of who
represented good and who represented evil is confusing, because
there is no clear answer . The most reasonable thing would have
been to create an information campaign to explain the harm that
drug use represented while respecting the decision of citizens. In
the end the state relented and the dry law was abolished, with this
demonstrated that the power of governments can not do
everything and that although the end is just can not be imposed in
violation of the freedom of choice of society, because very
honorable so that it does not have to justify the means employed
to achieve it and the duty of governments is to respect the free
will of citizens when it comes to deciding on his own life. From
that moment the state and citizens came to classify alcohol and
drugs snuff as good simply because these were the most
traditional and therefore began to persecute the others. This was
an act of blatant hypocrisy, because alcohol is the drug that causes
more deaths, but to make such a distinction somehow seemed
moral citizens remain intact, the blame for all the ills to other
drugs. The state should end this situation and promote the
eradication of drugs, but peacefully and without coercion, for
example using measures such as stop considering drunkenness an
extenuating circumstance for crimes committed, as now happens
in some countries, since such more measures to help eradicate
consumption is what they do favor it is clear that only when the
state and citizens call things by their name this may change. With
these measures, the mafia would disappear and many people who
are wrongfully imprisoned would come out of it, because if we

apply existing laws to all those who peddle drugs, then all owners
of bars or factories where it produces or sells alcohol should
being in prison. It is true that drugs must be fought, but only in
the field of moral education and the elimination of any legal
advantage for those who use drugs.
Another example of the distance that sometimes exists between
law and justice is like some criminal codes establish the right of
criminals to obtain compensation for injuries they might suffer
during the commission of a crime, in this case the bad faith is
evident the law, because its duty is to do everything necessary to
discourage the offender to commit crimes and not to encourage it.
Because if the argument of the law to justify this measure is that
the victim's act of defense had caused injury to the aggressor
higher than justified, then it is logical to hold accountable the
victim for their excess, but in no case allow an offender can be
rewarded for injuries they might suffer during their criminal
activity.
It is unfortunate that often when a crime, the law or do nothing or
take a position clearly in favor of the offender, just not wanting to
take measures involving public spending occurs. Clearly the
weakness and neglect in many of the penal codes of these false
democracies, because not only refuse to do justice, but in many
cases collude with criminals.
DECENT POLITICAL
It is a pity to see how the educational system itself is inculcated
children who live in a democracy, it seems that what really
seeking is to create a society of faithful servants obedient. But
how can be considered a democratic system that allows only thing
is to elect political leaders, but no option to directly decide the
laws that govern us? Clearly what is trying to convince citizens
that have a democracy, even knowing that such a thing is false.
But the most outrageous of all is that those politicians who call
themselves decent, are the same as applaud when a politician thief
is pardoned after serving a ridiculous part of his sentence without
having returned the stolen, those politicians who act this may not
be considered rather than as accomplices of others to such

behavior. As you can believe in the political agenda of those
proposing the release of serial murderers or rapists after serving
only a fraction of their sentences, and this systematically, they
include in their criminal codes the release of criminals in a short
time regardless of the seriousness of their crimes Could it be that
identify with them? Clearly, what they do is prepare the penal
code when they apply to them. These rascals politicians talk about
being humanitarian with criminals, but they refer to patronizing
criminals or thieves like them, never do justice to the victims,
which they despise, as only they consider them mere funding of
their parties . These hypocritical politicians, then Say 'Justice has
been done! They have served their sentences! But they know that
this statement is false because the laws are designed so that
impunity is standard. Most politicians call themselves decent but
how many of them are in favor of removing their privileges? They
measure with which society must judge put. These rascals
political friends say criminals quickly The jail is for reinserting!
But such a statement is false because the prison primarily aims to
remove from society those who do not deserve to be in it, and
whether the severity of their sentences to life imprisonment
determines that the right is met. Always it is reasonable to release
in the case of finding evidence of his innocence, but otherwise the
priority has to be the victim not the criminal. Sometimes Say
'Criminals have repented! But is there any criminal who does not
say repenting immediately after entering prison? These friends of
criminals, with whom they identify, they forget that who takes a
life of intentional and premeditated need not decide on his own,
and if society believes that the fair payment is an example
keeping you in prison then it is entitled to apply. Reinsertion is
always desirable, but for criminals who deserve it, but who takes
a life can not expect society to stop thinking about your tastes or
if you have repented or not, because for those who have a
conviction for centuries that You need not apply. Logically it
would correct a reduction of sentence for good behavior, but a
reduction is not an annulment, because the crimes are not
canceled, and therefore it is reasonable that such a reduction is a
minority percentage of the total, if what is looking for justice. It is
also fair prisoners to work because they are not hotels, so they can

pay compensation to their victims and expenses which might arise
during their stay in prison.
These politicians, false democrats, do not hesitate to use the threat
to citizens to participate in the electoral system, because there are
many countries in which fines those who refuse to collaborate
with deceit by refusing to vote or participate in the tables election.
They are wrong who think that the system can be changed from
within, as if it is a false democratic model the only solution is to
reject and refuse to participate in it, until those in power give the
hint, participate in the game parties is to fall into deception.
Clearly, when the thief is the one who makes the laws can not be
expected to do justice.
Actually existing political systems are nothing more than a mere
imitation of Greek models of the V century BC, left-wing parties
claim to care about workers but by supporting illegal immigration
all they do is promote a slave society like the yellowish Athens.
Right-wing parties have no obsession that perpetuate the
privileges of the rich slave-like Sparta. That game left and right to
bring the parties want is nothing but a fiction, the truth is neutral
and not subject to any party. The world needs a new way of
conceiving democracy, a system by which laws are directly
elected by citizens, only then this kind of political tricksters and
thieves can be eradicated from society permanently.
ASYMMETRICAL SOCIETY
Today it is striking to see how society seems to become
increasingly important to an asymmetric approach to life, art for
example is expressed increasingly through the deformity,
incoherence and absurdity, an example of this is at the
Guggenheim museum in Bilbao, in which both his supposed
works of art, like architecture of the building, all this represents
the asymmetry and deformity. This is an example of how a
society aimless expresses its definition of art, or what he thinks is
art. This is a society without God, but not because God has
abandoned them, but because they have turned their back on God.

Is not it true perhaps that in nature all things usually follow a
symmetrical shape? The roundness of the planets, the shape of
our bodies, that symmetry is actually the expression of order and
logic which is one of the factors that connect man with God. But
this current society feels omnipotent with technological
development, it is believed invincible and no doubt repeat the
mistakes of the past, this society forgets people and just think
about the mere economic productivity, this society goes
increasingly quickly towards a model based on slavery and
miscegenation, causing asymmetry and social disunity only by the
profit motive of companies. But what is the talk of business
growth or high per capita income, if people are unhappy with this
situation of miscegenation and crime that causes uncontrolled
immigration. The growth is not the only thing that counts, also
order and social integration that same culture and race represent,
but society does not want to see that this sea beast that is the
United States to do so led to believe, is presented to the world as
the great defender of freedom, but its policy is based on
imperialism and submission of the world to their interests, this
empire no doubt when you are interested in supporting dictators
or overthrowing only democracies so that their companies can
deplete the world's resources it is only necessary to see the
average income of an American and a citizen of Africa to
discover their deception, even within the United States itself
social inequalities are outrageous and successive governments do
not do anything about it, meanwhile in international politics make
propaganda in favor of miscegenation but only as a strategy to
promote world domination, day after day advertise how bad f hey
were the Nazis, but only for people not offer resistance to
domination they seek to impose, because they are now the new
dictators disguised as democrats, what is the difference between
being dominated by the Nazis or by a country of sodomites
mestizos? that is what has become the United States. We try to

make people believe that this is an ideal situation, but only pursue
world domination, this shows that in the world everything is
relative and the concept of democracy is no different. The truth is
that current political systems are far from real democracy, but do
not hesitate to use this as an excuse to justify interference in the
affairs of other states, but not in order to promote democracy, but
to support their selfish interests, as was done during the Roman
empire. Really is not that the US government supports
miscegenation as an end, it just tries to take advantage of his
victory against the Nazis, as if they were trying to dominate the
world with a racist policy, then they to get the same need to use
policy pro miscegenation as a way for that citizens do not realize
that pursue the same goals of the Nazis, but at the cost of
destroying the social order. Words that appear inside and outside
its borders support miscegenation but only to gain time until their
goal is submission of the world to their interests. But society
increasingly feel more dissatisfied with this situation, but worst of
all is that you do not know the remedy, does not understand that
the first casualty in war is truth loser, does not understand that the
racial question the Nazis were right and to achieve a developed
society this must be based on a stable order, whereby each live in
peace and harmony in the world but not mixed race, because each
race was made by nature to live in different climates, society must
understand that being in favor of respect for the rights of all races
does not mean you have to support miscegenation, because in fact
that miscegenation only serves as a vehicle to bring more disorder
and social inequality. But this society aimlessly is just repeating
the same mistakes of ancient Rome, to bet on a model of mixed
and slave society, now no longer it called slavery, but from a
comparative point of view the economic situation of these people
far from it. Because the best way to guarantee the rights of each
race is that each has a recognized territory, which is not possible

interference from other races in their own affairs, thus genuine
freedom itself would have.
THE SUBHUMANS
It is surprising to see how these subhuman try to seize power in
the world would have us believe that care workers when all they
do is agree in the shade with murderers and terrorists, those
subhuman seeking partnerships with all the world's dictators to
seize power and whose sole political objective is the submission
of society to his dictatorship. These populist subhuman would
have us believe that communism is a solution when failure is
evident even in those countries that developed it. They intended
to give us lessons of economy when their only project is the waste
of public resources, proposed borrowing as a solution to all
problems, but how are you going to go into debt a country that is
already in debt? It is that for them the balanced management of
the economy has no meaning? Because a model country is one
that depends on its own resources no resources of others, because
these guys what actually plan is asking for money and then not
return it and that's a mean-spirited conduct unbecoming of what
you can expect from a government. It is true that a country can
borrow, but only as part of a low debt situation, because that
money will gladly want to ask to return and of course with
interest, but this is not populist tell citizens. For an equal
government that a person when he is honored, find the solution to
their problems arranging their internal imbalances without trying
to convey their problems to others through borrowing as this
solution can only be exceptional but never a way of life, because
it is only fair that a nation depends on what it produces and not
what others produce. It is therefore necessary to review those
things that are wrong in the economy to work depending on their
own resources, particularly avoiding unnecessary corruption and
wastefulness. An example of this is in the present public health
fraud, it is not the same earmark money to care for the sick to
make sure that money really goes to the purpose for which it was
intended, since in many cases is lost in an unjustified

overvaluation of treatments, or the monopoly of the
intermediaries involved in healthcare. This is a health system too
interested in buying drugs, but little interested in curing diseases.
They intended to propose themselves as a substitute for religion
when he has never been a nation where the political model has
benefited its citizens, rely on populist statements claiming seek
the good of the workers but only covet the power to create a
dictatorship they destroy everything they touch because all that is
in their intentions is selfishness. Because there is no more
despicable than robbing a poor thing and that is precisely what
they do. These individuals claim to be concerned about human
rights, but at the same time calling for serial murderers sentenced
to life imprisonment meet only a fraction of their sentences, it is
clear that when they speak of rights do not relate to the victims.
It is true that a developed nation is characterized by caring for all
its citizens including those who are in a disadvantaged situation,
but these populist what they want is not help but use that
argument as an excuse to seize power at the same time They are
destroying their own country. For an economy progresses is one
that rewards work and not vagrancy and therefore it is essential
that as much as possible contributory aid are returned to the state
by citizens, by creating a work program.
It is also true that trying to recover an economy by reducing
wages is a ridiculous solution and especially highlights the lack of
talent of the political class, because reducing the salaries of those
who earn the least causing a contraction economy, considering
that those with the lowest wages generally spend everything they
earn and therefore this measure can only lead to a reduction in
business. Therefore, the best remedy for an economy to function
is to assume without fear of an economic model that rewards
work instead excessively in favor of grants, and therefore the
economy is more oriented towards full employment to
dependence state. Because when an economy tends to solve
everything with subsidies, such as work absences are covered by
paying workers less missing in the end what occurs is an injustice
to them, it is not that the system can not create insurance to cover
such absences, which does not make sense is that the emphasis is
on those most work. Therefore, the perfect social model is one

that helps those in need, but demanding also lose your part and
responsibility for work absences are shared equally between the
company and the worker in order that this is not used as a pretext
for laziness or lack of work unjustified. Therefore a perfect
economy is one that rewards work, but at the same time helping
those in need by requiring an effort to change, to return the favor
received. Because an economy can only be competitive when he
is grateful to those who strive to develop, otherwise only leads to
unemployment and lack of competitiveness, because in the end
who end up paying these efforts really are the same workers
holding companies.
It is also essential to fight corruption, fomented by the politicians
themselves, but that will not end until the penal code to be
modified and the political class no longer get away with judicial
proceedings in which it is processed, the problem is that when the
thief it is the law that makes it very difficult to solve.
THE LAST WAR
The world is getting closer to his last battle, but not a war
between nations but a battle between good and evil, light and
darkness, ignorance and knowledge, a war that is not done with
tanks and rifles but exists within each person, because the moral
development is really the last stage in the process of evolution of
humanity. That process has been delayed continuously by the fact
that the philosophical progress is at odds with economic progress,
as to make possible their development is necessary to have time
have privacy to meditate, because it is through meditation as it
progresses philosophy and the deeper the highest concentration is
the usefulness of the results. But human life through history has
been a continuous struggle for survival that has left very little
opportunity to develop inner awareness, but that awareness is
what differentiates an evolved another that is not. Arguably
philosophy is food for the spirit and who thinks he can live
without principles is wrong, as are those principles that help us
relate to the universe in a fruitful way, so the man of the future
consider his inner development as its greatest value, and the
defense of right and justice as the core of their behavior.

CHAPTER 3 - SCIENCE
THE AUTHENTIC ART
Today we see anything called art, it seems that people have lost
the ability to distinguish what is beautiful from what is not, are
not able to understand that true art it is the result of effort and
sacrifice and not the trivial whims, because art arises when
something is created in harmony with nature, something that has a
logic and a result. Because there is much more art in the design of
an engine or the architecture of a building, which in those vulgar
drawings what they call abstract art. People are not able to
understand that those who call themselves artists are but a redoubt
of vague and pretentious that generally lack talent, because before
any criticism they simply say I just do not understand my art! It's
that you are ignorant! But would have to see if those artists call
themselves are able to do something that requires talent as an old
portrait or engineering design, sure to fail, because it is easier to
give a few strokes on a canvas and then call it art, do something
that requires difficulty. This is not to say that it can make sense to
abstract art, but when it is not based on absurd drawings, because
its true meaning is to use recognizable symbolic figures but in
situations other than its normal form, i.e. they are able to suggest
something more important and logical to observe it, but that
requires talent and know how to draw something that impostors
would find it impossible to get, but the worst part is that this
present society, which is believed so developed, something as
basic as this will be difficult to understand. We live in a society
without order or moral society whose God is the only commodity
production, so it is logical that this band is capable of developing
impostors. It is regrettable that when those individuals who call
themselves artists of the abstract are promoted by an art gallery,
become treated as being deified and their absurd drawings are
seeking twisted justifications and cultural value undeserving and
everything in order promote the gallery and get money, citizens
should not easily accept the arguments of those false artists,
because in this present degenerate society all are selfish interests
and needs an objective analysis to arrive at the truth and not be

easily carried away by the means or beliefs of the masses can be
manipulated easily. Only in a society without order or moral
existence of such impostors it explained, because when a world
lacks direction is very difficult to produce true artists, therefore it
tends to elevate those undesirable and fiction is created that their
works are just great because they want to look in the mirror and
understand the decadent world in which they live. People should
ask who and why they are interested in promoting an art without
direction or sense, perhaps deep fear that society wake up and
demand the changes that they are not interested.
THE FLOOD
The legend of the Great Flood is present in many cultures, this
belief may have its origin in the events that occurred after the end
of the last glaciation occurred about twelve thousand years ago, at
that time much of the earth's surface was covered by ice, this
caused the sea level was tens of meters lower than today. In those
days the main centers of civilization were located in desert areas
today but in those days had extensive vegetation, mainly in the
regions of Egypt and Mesopotamia. The beginning of the thaw
caused a growing flood in the river beds and an elevation in the
level of the coast, this in the mouths of the Tigris and Euphrates
rivers it must have caused major flooding. Climate change not
only occurred in that region, because everyone was affected, the
Channel had a layer of ice that connected France with England,
defrost the sea penetrated and definitely separated. Many large
islands were reduced to insignificant islets. But where it could be
the most dramatic change is in the Mediterranean area, because
the increased sea level this penetrated from the Atlantic through
the Strait of Gibraltar flooding throughout the region. Increasing
the Earth's temperature turned what was once a green oasis in a
desert regions like the Sahara in Egypt and Mesopotamia,
gradually changing the sphere of political power in Africa and the
Middle East to Europe. Probably the events in ancient times as a
result of the end of glaciation were passed in the ancient stories
like a great flood, the mistakenly believed it was caused by rain
and not by the melting of large amounts of water.

THE EVOLUTION OF HOMO SAPIENS
Formerly, some thirty thousand years ago, Europe was covered by
ice of the last glaciation, because of this continent was practically
deserted but inhabited by Neanderthals. Meanwhile Africa at that
time enjoyed a much more pleasant climate similar to today's
Mediterranean climate. This situation caused the Homo sapiens
settled in Africa had a long time and an ideal climate to evolve.
As the global temperature increased homo sapiens began moving
to Europe and was replacing the Neanderthals, did not it was a
necessarily violent replacement, because being the homo superior
sapiens was evolutionarily able to extract food from the best
environment that man Neanderthal. Some cases of interbreeding
between the two species were also given, but the result was a
human version less than Homo sapiens. Eventually this version
was disappearing as the superior genes were predominating over
the lower, however, at present a small number of genes of
Neanderthals, are still preserved in the homo sapiens probably
because they are responsible for the adaptation to cold European
climate, although it is also true that the crossing does not occur
these genes were acquired just a process of natural evolution. In
any case, the migration of Homo sapiens to the north was not the
result of adaptation to Europe, but Europe adapts to it, because
the cause of this was that the European climate was becoming
warmer and therefore more like him who had the Homo sapiens
in Africa.
This shows that living in an ideal climate favoring racial
improvement, but currently this is an issue that can not talk unless
it is to deny it, but not scientific but political reasons. Therefore, I
find despicable those who accept the existence in the past of
species with different levels of development, but at the same time
deny the possibility that there may be better breeds than others
today, because given the time to pro crossbreeding in which we
live since the end of world war II is clear that although these tests
are known certainly will not be announced.
The reality is that there are no single species or races better than
others, but even within the same race can be found these

differences. Proof of this is the different amount of body hair that
people have, because although most people have little, however
there are exceptions to this rule, the explanation is simple and is
that since humans started wearing clothes body hair began to
disappear to produce better human version, eventually people
with long hair certainly disappear, but not because nothing is
done against them, but the selection process that nature has been
doing for thousands of years.
This is an example of the difference in the genetic quality of
people, but the most striking of all is the most beautiful of
European race over the other. This may be obvious, but it will
certainly be rejected by many, but not because they have reasons
for it, but because when prejudices are conditioning our mind
then people will be able to call night to day and day to night so
not to recognize the obvious.
What we call races, is nothing but an accumulation of large
enough genetic differences to be differentiable, but each person is
the sum of thousands of different genes a more evolved and more
primitive, therefore the progress of the genetics is not only that
may arise from the differences that may exist between different
races but above all for the gradual elimination of backward
diseased genes or carried out by natural selection itself or also by
the action of human science.
Actually, it is as if each person were a race miniature with a
different genetic load due to natural selection in the end only the
best versions prevail and that will cause future physical
differences or character are less than now. Because although we
do not realize our body there early genes that are in the process of
disappearing and each new generation are less present in the
world, however there are other superior genes that are in the
process of expansion, this process can take thousands of years and
causes the appearance of better people.
The truth is that progress has been in balance and the white race is
found in the part of the Earth with the most balanced climate,
therefore, for the story was the most evolved of all. Living in an
ideal climate not only favors the appearance of a more beautiful
race but also more spiritual, because the extreme heat hinders the
development of these dimensional aspects. It is also important to

remember that civilization was moving from south to north along
the story exactly as did the weather, i.e. when these civilizations
existed, both race and the climate that there were, they were more
like the European today than they have right now. In fact, chances
are that in those days blacks did not exist, as a result of the low
temperatures that the Earth was due to glaciation. The truth is that
the policy of pro miscegenation is from an evolutionary point of
view a serious mistake, because as communism gives priority to
quantity over quality.
THE NEW YEAR
Since ancient times, all civilizations tried to measure time and it
realized the usefulness of using the solstices to measure the
seasons and the passing years. Then they began to make buildings
such as Stonehenge to determine the largest solar inclination and
thus to fix at this time the beginning of the year, because there is
only one winter or summer solstice each year.
It would therefore be desirable for the year again start with the
winter solstice on Dec. 22, when starting in antiquity, because it
makes sense as understood by the old the new year begins at the
moment when the sun begins to rise and the days are getting
longer, doing so would be the most natural way to classify the
years was actually the Catholic church that envy of the festival is
traditionally celebrated at that time he decided to set the birth of
Jesus just a few days later, on December 25, with malicious order
to wrest this party its true meaning. Indeed the Catholic Church is
completely unaware of the actual date of Jesus' birth or even the
year, so its bad faith in this regard is clear, and there was this his
only invention, because in reality everything related to childhood
Jesus and subsequent stories about his miracles were invented
such falsehoods not we owe attributed to Jesus, for we must not
forget that the Catholic church was not founded by him but by the
Roman empire as a last resort to prevent its collapse. Therefore, it
is good that society recover the winter solstice as the date to
establish the beginning of the year and thus getting back tune with
nature. In addition, institutions should review the history and
unmask the falsehoods propagated by religious organizations,

because we can not accept that simple hypotheses are proposed
citizens as unquestionable truths.
ORDER IN THE COUPLE
In any organized system there needs to be clear leadership to
make possible the order in marriage this is equally important,
because both spouses are two people with two ways of thinking
different, so it is necessary to establish a control command by
which it is possible to stabilize the couple. In my opinion, this
function is better than exercising man, because if we look at
nature this is how the sun works in the animal world, also in the
cosmos as a male element exerts the presidential function in the
solar system to be at the center and coordinate the other planets.
Furthermore, as regards the human being is and has traditionally
been throughout history and although it is true that in the past
have done wrong things, it would be unfair to say that they have
only suffered by women because evolution was difficult for
everyone. Therefore, I consider it logical that the man who holds
the office of president that gives meaning to the family.
This in any case have to be confused with a dictatorship, for man
must only perform the function of commanding a democratic
manner, without imposing his will, i.e. its leadership role should
be only administrative taking into account the views of others and
be fair and benevolent in its deliberations. Of course the right of
withdrawal must always be recognized for both, because as I said
the leadership of the husband in no case should be a dictatorship.
It is also true that the fact that the man holds the office of
president of the family does not prevent it from having some
obligations to them and therefore does not meet its commitments
would be fair to him reproach for it, because the duty of man it is
to lead the marriage but only to serve you. It is necessary that
each spouse understand that each gender was made by nature to
specialize in different functions therefore need not wonder that
these functions are also different in marriage, but it is also true
that such specialization does not have to prevent right of both
spouses to be equally happy. For this reason the law also has to
act accordingly and in case of separation recognize both spouses

equal right to care for their children except that they can
demonstrate a clear guilt of one, i.e. that both spouses they could
live with their children the same time until they were older or
share the common housing in equal time periods.
In order to obtain the vote for women in some countries
politicians raised family relationships only as feminist topics, so
felt that the fault was always the man in case of separation, or
were denied custody of their children saying I could not serve
them well. Injustice to establish that virtually all the goods of
marriage happen to women, is the floor, children, and even an
important part of the salary husband was so committed, this made
the separation in a lynching, but with the backing of law,
forgetting their duty to be fair and impartial and condemning the
man to misery. This type of laws rather than regulate the
separation they do is induce her, by clearly privileging one
spouse, it is assumed that the man was rich and therefore able to
dispose of their property without suffering no consequence.
The truth is that because of feminism many women are not ready
for marriage, because since childhood has taught them that their
duty is to confront men in the workplace instead of serving as
mothers, so motherhood pose as a hindrance in carrying out such
topics and in many cases only come to have a child which is
totally insufficient for generational change, thus feminism
becomes a real threat to bring society to its own destruction.
Political feminist proposed by immigration as a solution, but that
does not stop the problem is the lack of birth and is only half a
solution by shifting the problem to others. In addition, this
measure caused a genuine racial and cultural disorder, turning the
working class as a social group of partial slavery, because the
massive influx of immigrants causes the lowering of the
minimum wage. I do not mean by this that women can not enter
the labor market, but it would be logical that first fulfill their duty
as mothers ensuring generational change and from there can be
made in other activities.
But most surprising is to see how feminists intend to raise as
illogical the fact that women are the ones that should be
responsible primarily for the care of children, especially in
childhood, because if we look at the example of how the animals

care for their young can see how it is the females who usually
deal with their offspring in a more direct way. Does that mean
then that all animals are sexist? In humans adjectives like sexism
or feminism are used, but it would be stupid to apply such
epithets to animals, as these are much more conditioned by nature
in their behavior that we, because if anyone should be accused of
macho would have to be nature itself or God and not animals. But
if the question to consider is who has more wisdom whether
feminists or nature I am inclined to the second, for it is nature that
decided through evolution separate the animals into sexes, and it
was nature that determined that were women who will become
pregnant and suckle their children, not men. This is because he
felt it was better gender specialization and separation of functions
that have no advantage of one over the other but for the good of
all. So, how wrong it is considered that the separation in different
functions equals one underestimation of women, for this
separation in no way entitles the mistreatment of one sex over the
other as both have the same obligation to respect and cooperate in
the development family and both have the same right to be happy.
At the end gives the impression that many of these feminist
movements actually are led by unfeminine women but with great
ambition for power, which is actually what they are trying is to
use the other women to not know what they really want it is to
live a life of men, but not because it is good for women but
because they do not feel women.
THE BIPOLARITY OF THE COSMOS
Arguably the cosmos most things have a positive or negative,
which should not be confused with good or bad, as both are
benign, this bipolarity is born with the nature of the cosmos, polar
defined as essentially began with the that the subject is the
opposite of vacuum and vacuum is the opposite of the art, both
are the same but in reverse since it can not exist without the other,
since the vacuum without matter could no comparison, because
the vacuum is nothingness. Matter represents the existence and
nonexistence and void both exist outside of time because the
universal laws are the same as always, the time change represents

the evolutionary movement of matter but within those laws.
Consequently arise calls polarities arising for example the sexes
or the magnetic poles, but is immense amount of things that are
defined polar form. In the universe the two polarities are equally
important, but that does not mean that it fulfilled the same
functions, so lamentable is the current confrontation between the
sexes, because it is not understood that the fact that both are
equally necessary does not mean that they have to do the same
things.
VALUES ARE MEN
The sun relative to the earth, salt, heat, red, the galactic core,
circle, power, government, the crest in a sling, the pleasure
derived from the technique, the positive magnetic pole, the day,
the vertical line, the minority, the exception, the numbers one,
two, four, five, seven and eight.
FEMININE VALUES ARE
The planets from the sun, the stars about the galactic core, sugar,
philosophy, cold, blue, square, night, the valley in a sling, the
horizontal line, water, sea, the negative magnetic pole, the
majority, the numbers zero three, six and nine.
There are actually male or female values in all, this is not a
contradiction, the key is expressed in different planes.
GOOD AND EVIL
GOOD
It represents good light, white, justice, truth, intelligence, wisdom,
knowledge, right, progress, above.
EVIL
Evil represents ignorance, darkness, error, down the mistake, the
black color.

Do not confuse the positive or negative values in the cosmos in
most things good and evil, for positive or negative values are all
benign and necessary, while misrepresents what is unacceptable
and wrong . Good and evil have in common with the values that
have polarity that are opposites like them, but unlike them it does
not mean that both are desirable, because in fact evil only
represents that which is never desirable and therefore something
that we should stay away. Good then represents the right and
acceptable, wrong and wrong and wrong, are opposite each other,
but only one represents what makes sense to do. Actually evil
could be defined as the percentage of accidents is inevitable in the
evolution of the cosmos, for it has no sense to look for evil
intended, therefore err who adhere to sects based on evil, it is as if
identified with ignorance, stupidity or would delay those arising
evil objective end up being unhappy, then lie in an unstable
position who becomes antisocial and unable to relate to others in
a balanced way. Evil is the result of the inevitable return of the
cosmos to the ignorance that is derived from its restart. The same
universe that people also have to die to be renewable, with this
renewal comes forgetfulness and oblivion comes the error, but
also the shock of the new, yet the suffering caused the error is not
a goal in itself but it is a necessary evil if the universe wants to
renew, why are mistaken who think that evil is desirable as good,
for what the universe needs is to start again and forget to be
renewable, but evil is not more than the suffering caused by the
error, the result of that renewal. Evil is not a goal in itself, what is
needed is to renew the cosmos and return to ignorance to be able
to recycle, evil is undesirable consequence of this renewal and
therefore all the effort of progress is based on the fight to avoid
the mistake that makes us suffer and represents evil, a constant
struggle from darkness into light. Evil is the error, and obviously
no one wants to be wrong, however renew the universe needs to
be able to forget, and it is because of forgetfulness as ignorance,
error and evil arises. Evil in human behavior stems from a
mistaken view of reality, so those who so behave believe that a
permanent attitude of confrontation with their peers they will
serve useful, but such a thing is an error derived get carried away

a petty and despotic approach to things, but that makes them
unhappy who so behave, because it is wrong and unbalanced
behavior, it is necessary to understand that in human relations
good and peaceful coexistence must be the cornerstones behavior
in order to be happy. One of the possible explanations of evil in
human behavior would be a deviation in the natural
aggressiveness caused by excessive consent from parents on the
whims of their children, this causes children to believe they can
do whatever they want without caring the consequences, this
attitude eventually results in a mean-spirited behavior as a
common pattern in adulthood is very difficult to correct, children
need to learn that their rights end where they begin those of
others, therefore it is essential to teach moral values from the
childhood.
The universe when it restarts again ignorance of the error drift and
error derives evil, but that does not mean that evil is the goal of
cosmic renewal but rather an inevitable consequence, therefore
from the same time the cosmos begins to evolve the effort of
every living creature is to progress from darkness to light and
from ignorance to knowledge. Therefore the universe to renew
and forget not looking for evil, but again reliving the same
emotions as if for the first time. For this reason those worlds that
reach a high level of evolution definitively banish evil represented
by vanity and ignorance.
THE BLACK AND WHITE COLOR
As I said these colors are benign and necessary essence, however
they can also represent good or evil, but secondary, these colors
can represent both masculine values such as female depending on
the plane in which they are.
WHITE COLOR
White represents the horizontal line in planes and vertical in
others, also the truth, goodness, justice, the day, progress, white
light, sugar, intelligence, philosophy, above the divine, the

backbone of the universe, universal laws, most in some planes
represents the masculine and other feminine.
THE COLOR BLACK
The black color represents the night, seriousness, in a deep valley,
rest, renewal, minority, sometimes evil, error or ignorance in
some planes represents the feminine and the masculine other.
It is clear then that the existence of positive and negative values in
the cosmos are both equally necessary and benign and should not
be confused with the evil of the error, and is only the result of the
renewal of the cosmos, it is true that to give rise to this renewal is
also provided that evil appears, but is not a goal in itself, but an
inevitable consequence, renewed and re ignorance is necessary
when the universe has aged, it allows live again emotions as if
they were new, the suffering caused by the error and represents
evil is just the price to pay for this renewal. For this reason all
evolved society must have the right and justice as fundamental
philosophical principles.
THE TOTAL JUSTICE AND EXCEPTIONS
In principle, any evolved society needs a code of moral values to
establish justice as principal rule of conduct, otherwise it would
be impossible to create a stable social order, in my opinion ideally
defend the full justice as the only way to raise the moral behavior,
full justice means the fair and without exception as the only
acceptable behavior. However it is also possible to believe in an
approach to fair behavior admitting exceptions, this is the reason
for writing this article that is trying to give a logical sense to
define it as in the case of sense.
First let me say that admitted the possibility of considering unfair
behaviors as valid only make sense if raised as exceptional,
meaning that although it is believed that both justice and injustice
are necessary or justifiable to be considered as part of a set of
different polarities but equally important, however should be
expressed in different dimensions or planes but organized as
majority and minority. That is that justice should be raised as the

norm of behavior and injustice as the exception, in this sense the
right behavior should be normal moral form present in the human
mind as both dimensions must always be separated, be ambiguous
about can only cause harm to those who confuse it, i.e. the pursuit
of good and justice should be the main driver of behavior and
possible unfair behaviors they appear only casually and indirectly.
This means that even considering to justice and injustice as two
equal and necessary forces in a generic sense not behave in
practice, it would be distributed as if in them a force of gravity
that would separate distributed in the form of majority is applied
and minority, this does not mean underestimating the minority
force, as a relative size is not the same as an absolute value, we
can find in the cosmos examples to prove, such as the distribution
of the solar system, in this case the sun represents the except it is
in the center of the system and the different star of others, and
planets represent the norm because they are more numerous, yet
the sun still being only one and different is so important in
organizing the solar system as planets it is larger and more
massive than all the planets together and is the source of energy in
the cosmos.
Another example is how the political system is distributed in an
organized society, in this case government members represent the
exception and all other citizens the norm, but the exception in this
case is who runs the state but always in direct connection with
society. This shows that the separation of the majority and
minority dimensions need not be interpreted as an
underestimation of the concept of minority. It could be said that
the key would be in the potential, meaning that although the right
behavior should be the protagonist of our lives in terms of our
habitual behavior, exceptional cases of injustice would have
greater importance may be associated frequently political or
economic power, this does not mean that those in power have to
be necessarily unfair, but the power it easy.
Arguably from a symbolic point of view that injustice is like the
sun, something exceptional and energy but separate from the
norm and stability represented by justice and planets, therefore
whoever touches can burn. To avoid unpleasant consequences
need not play with this issue and uphold justice as the norm of our

usual moral conduct, and that basically every action has a
consequence and who questions the rights of others you risk the
reaction it represents the self-defense.
In this case the sun is expressed in a vertical and minority and
symbolized by the red plane, could also represent injustice or
central government, the planets in this case the horizontal line
represent good and white. We must differentiate in this case the
injustice of tyranny, injustice would be represented by the color
red and from this point of view it would make sense sometimes
exceptionally. Tyranny instead would be represented by the black
color and would always be rejected because it is a variant of
injustice but out of place and sense. This means that evil could be
said to injustice when it abandons its balanced attitude to become
the norm of habitual behavior is what makes tyranny, it could also
be defined as a disease of the spirit when it loses the notion of
reality and therefore is always wrong and reprehensible behavior.
Needless to say black in this case has a negative meaning but this
does not have to be necessarily so, because the colors are
essentially benign and malignant approach depends on the
circumstances, since in the background evil and tyranny They are
the result of ignorance and this is precisely one of the meanings of
black color, i.e. it is the inability to see the white light of truth and
knowledge.
Although the wrongful conduct might make sense sometimes, you
never should be sought routinely, because it is logical that alone is
something exceptional and would not be the dominant element in
our mind. Precisely what is defined as demon is when someone
ignores this and becomes evil in its raison d'etre, this alone can
hurt him, because he becomes incapable antisocial relate to
anyone except those degenerate like him, it is therefore necessary
to teach moral behavior from children to understand the
consequences of antisocial behavior a can have.
Another way to explain why justice should be the moral principle
of conduct is that from an energy standpoint justice represents the
horizontal and stable line, while injustice would be energetically
unstable vertical line, for this reason it healthy and safe life is to
consider taking justice as a way of normal behavior. As I said
definitions of vertical and horizontal planes are not fixed and in

other circumstances justice is expressed vertically as the
backbone of the universe, and representing the divine, the truth
and the white light. As I said the fact define evil black or injustice
red does not mean that therefore these colors should be
considered negative, as these interpretations are only one of the
secondary variants that may be associated these colors, since all
colors are benign essentially the same can be said with respect to
numbers.
So it could be said that although justice and injustice were
considered as two acceptable forces in generic terms, the perfect
balance in human behavior only find separating these concepts
into one majority and a minority, being therefore just conduct the
normal way of our being and just having this clear our minds can
find your balance.
To explain more clearly the theory of the exceptions of justice
would arguably be a square scheme X in which the lines would go
from top left to bottom right and from top right to bottom left, on
the right triangle and white justice would be found and the left
and red triangle injustice would be found, this would represent the
absolute generic values, but in practice justice occupy most of the
horizontal surface and injustice minimal but with more height
because They are expressed in the form of majority and minority,
arguably is as two schemes, one square with an X in the center,
are expressed only the absolute values, in the other rectangular, or
also oval as the shape of a galaxy the way in which it is normally
expressed as percentages does so by majority and minority
shown. However when we refer to the ratio between good and bad
it would be the same approach but in this case the scheme would
be rotated reaching the wrong black on the bottom and the fine
white on top, in this case is different because unlike evil injustice
would always be rejected without exception, being a wrong
behavior. Therefore in the case of logic considering the theory of
justice exceptions it should be raised as the usual moral norm, the
possible exceptions would exceptionally and evil as we have
always said it would be rejected.
It can be said then that although the right and wrong have equal
absolute values in practice be distributed in completely different
and separate planes defined in this case injustice in a vertical

My Philosophical Ideas 2 eBook Covers Topics on Medicine, Politics, Science & Philosophy

My Philosophical Ideas 2 eBook Covers Topics on Medicine, Politics, Science & Philosophy

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (10)

Similar to My Philosophical Ideas 2 eBook Covers Topics on Medicine, Politics, Science & Philosophy

Similar to My Philosophical Ideas 2 eBook Covers Topics on Medicine, Politics, Science & Philosophy (7)

More from Antonio Pinto Renedo

More from Antonio Pinto Renedo (15)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

My Philosophical Ideas 2 eBook Covers Topics on Medicine, Politics, Science & Philosophy