Essay Writing Service http://HelpWriting.net/Murder-Is-Wrong

1. Murder Is Wrong
Murder is wrong. Since childhood we've been tutored this indisputable truth. raise
yourself, then, what's capital punishment? In its simplest kind, corporal punishment is outlined
together person taking the lifetime of another. coincidently, that's the definition of murder. There
are thirty six states with the corporal punishment, and that they should modification. These states
ought to get rid of it on the grounds that it carries a dangerous risk of grueling the innocent, is
unethical and barbaric, Associate in Nursing is an ineffective deterrent of crime versus the choice
of life in jail while not parole. Capital punishment is that the most irreparable crime governments
commit while not consequence, and it should be abolished. "We're solely ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
What message can we send the yank folks, and different
countries, for that matter, if we tend to still be a nation that kills its voters, a nation that enforces
the foremost barbaric kind of punishment? The Illinois Coalition to get rid of the corporal
punishment states, "We don't bring to an end the hands of thieves to protect property; we tend to
don't stone adulterers to prevent extramarital sex. we tend to take into account that barbaric.
nevertheless we tend to still take life as a way of protective life." no one, government­
affiliated
or not, has the proper to determine if another human is worthy or unworthy life. Our natural
rights as humans, that can not be removed by the govt., embody the proper to life. Humans aren't
cold metal coins that lose value; no act, notwithstanding however grievous, will build an
individual less of somebody's being. However, for many it's straightforward to forget that every

2. of the one,099 dead since 1977 ar fellow humans, not simply numbers. According to Amnesty
International, "The corporal punishment violates the proper to life." corporal
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

3. Gerald Graff And Rakoff's They Say I Say
In chapter seven of They Say / I Say, Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein address how to improve a
topic through connectivity, and how the topic relates to the reader. They do so by introducing the
questions "so what?" and "who cares?" – which, in their view, make for a more stimulating paper.
Even if an issue is "obviously" consequential, Birkenstein and Graff argue, the writer should "go as
far as possible" in answering those questions (100). One way the writer can do this is by refutibg the
standard opinion of their topic (97). Judge Jed Rakoff does precisely that in his article, "Why
Innocent People Plead Guilty." He begins by noting that "the criminal justice system bears little
resemblance to what the Founding Fathers contemplated . . . [and] what the average American
believes." Due to plea bargains, jury trials in the United States are exceedingly rare, in spite of
constitutional provisions for "a speedy and public" trial. If there is no trial, there can be no "speedy"
trial, and that means that this constitutional right, for most, is a myth. But while this revelation
complicates and adds relevance to Rakoff's topic, he also asks "What's wrong with that?" – a
variation of "so what?" In answer to this question, he says that plea bargains are "secret
negotiations" that "invite[] arbitrary results." Both innocent and guilty defendants, in other words,
are placed in the same pot, and the goal is to achieve the appearance of fairness, not the realization
of it. Considering ninety–seven percent of federal convictions are the results of guilty pleas
(Rakoff), that is a haunting injustice. Journalist Antonia Malchik takes a similar approach to in "The
End of Walking." The "right to walk," as Malchik calls it, might not seem as important as the right
to a fair trial, but she is explicit about the cost. Walking, Malchik observes, is an "interconnection of
cognitive processes" that can have a significant impact on everything from cardiovascular disease to
muscle atrophy. Yet walking as way of life is more out of reach than ever. For instance, in 2013,
more than 4,700 pedestrians were killed in traffic crashes (Malchik). Malchik further emphasizes the
seriousness of the situation by including a relevant
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

4. Persuasive Essay On Death Penalty
"Would you choose to be the person that pulls the switch that snuffs out a human life?"
(www.oadp.org) Really think about that. Would you want to be the person who does the execution?
Many things come into factor when thinking about the death penalty. Cost, guilty or not guilty,
humanity, social changes, and so much more. A recent study showed that 1 of 25 people on death
row is innocent, and not guilty in America. Since 1973, one hundred forty–four prisoners on death
row were found to be not guilty of the crime they were convicted of. (www.commondreams.org)
Those are all irreversible. They can't just bring them back. Is that really something that should be
happening? What's that solving? The people who really did the crimes are STILL alive and can be
roaming freely as the prisoner that was thought to be guilty, is not guilty and on the way to death.
Which is my next topic; The money that is spent on these executions is out of this world. The cost of
prisoners on death row, waiting to get their death penalty costs about 1.26 million dollars. Whereas
cases, without the death penalty cost only about 740,000 dollars. Now as taxpayers which most are
this will cost one about 90,000 dollars more PER year than a regular prisoner sentenced to life in
jail. There 714 people on California's death row as we speak.(www.deathpenaltyinfo.com) If you do
the math, that's an awful lot of money. Without the death penalty, it will save a lot of money, for the
world and the human people
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

5. Dodd-Frank Research Paper
Dodd–Frank: A Guide to Financial Reform
Elizabeth Ables, Stefanie Gaines, Angela Howell, Samantha Johnston, and Christina Wright
This paper is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for
Business Ethics and Legal Environment BUS 5933.49
Texas Woman's University
School of Management
H. Guy Smith, J.D.
December 8, 2012
Table of Contents
The Great Recession of 2008 and the Dawn of Dodd–Frank ................................. 3
The History of Financial Reform in the United States ......................................... 3
Who Are the Agencies Responsible for Implementing Dodd–Frank? ....................... 5
What is Dodd–Frank and Who Does it Affect? ................................................. 9
What is Wrong with Dodd–Frank? ............................................................... 14
Dodd–Frank and Politics – To Reform or Not To ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The legislation was repealed in 1999 when key players from the financial arena urged Congress to
pass the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act to reverse Glass–Steagall's restrictions on bank securities
(Heakal, 2003).
Financial Reform Today
Dodd–Frank is the latest financial reform passed by Congress, and by far the most extensive.
According to Amadeo, Dodd–Frank is "the most comprehensive reform since the Glass–Steagall Act
of 1933" (2012, para.1). The goals of Dodd–Frank are to implement consumer protections, end
bailouts with tax payer money, create a council to identify risks, eliminate loopholes for risky
behavior, implement say on pay for executives, protect investors, and enforce strict regulations on
Wall Street (House of Representatives, n.d.). Dodd–Frank lacks clarity and is lengthy, running over
1,000 pages long (New York, 2012). In many cases, Dodd–Frank does not contain explicit rules, but
instead creates an outline whereby financial oversight agencies have been charged with conducting
research and writing and implementing the rules.
Who Are the Agencies Responsible for Implementing Dodd–Frank? Prior to the financial crisis, the
overall responsibility for financial oversight was divided among several different agencies. These
agencies and their "varying rules and standards led to certain entities not being regulated at all, with
others subject to less oversight than their peer
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

6. Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining
Logan Smith
Professor Nielsen
English 1001
Wednesday, April 1, 2015
The No Need Plea
Most Americans believe that when the government accuses someone of a crime the case goes to
trial, where a jury hears arguments from the prosecution and the defense then ponders over the
evidence before making a decision on the defendant's guilt or innocence. This impression is very
off. Criminal cases rarely go to trail, because 95% are resolved by plea bargains. Plea bargaining is
when a deal is offered by a prosecutor as an incentive for a defendant to plead guilty. This incentive
may be a lighter charge or lighter sentence. Some people are in favor of plea bargaining and others
are not. I believe that plea bargaining is unconstitutional, undermines the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Plea bargaining is said to allow the victims to be shielded from the emotional stress/anxiety of trial,
it is also suppose to prevent the victim from having to be in the presence of the offender and having
to re–live the victimization. Plea bargaining is also said to provide the victim with the closure and
the understanding that the defendant will be punished for their crime. Although this may be true,
without a doubt, plea bargaining hurts victims. Many victims are disappointed when defendants are
allowed to enter plea bargains, it creates a feeling that the harms they suffered were disregarded and
the defendants got off way too easily. A perfect example of how plea bargaining can hurt victims is
the story of the sexual assault that occurred University of Cincinnati's campus. Mark Glover, a 27
year–old graduate student met a girl in the dining hall, introduced himself, hung out with her and
then told her that he wanted to show her something in the Steger Student Life Center. In the Steger
Student Life Center he forced her into bathroom, holding her against her will and raped her. Mark
was charged with four counts of rape, one count of gross sexual imposition, and one count of
kidnapping. Thanks to a plea deal offered by the prosecutor to ensure conviction, Glover pleaded
guilty to two counts of gross sexual imposition and all other charges were dismissed. Glover was
sentenced to three years of probation.(Butts) Katherine Pridemore, assistant prosecuting attorney
said, "No one was happy with this plea. We wanted him to go to prison." Not only does this story
show how plea bargaining undermines the system and is unconstitutional but it also shows how
justice is not served to the victim. Situations like these make people lose hope in the system and
when that happens people begin to seek their own justice. This creates more problems for everyone.
Is society

7. ... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

8. The False Claims Act
On October 24, 2012 the Unites States of America filed a lawsuit against the Bank of America
Corporation for selling toxic mortgages to Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac which cost the taxpayers
more than $1 billion dollars. The lawsuit sought penalties under two laws; the False Claims Act,
which is normally used to target fraud against the government, and the 1989 FIRREA Law. FIRREA
does not usually hold up in court, but the government is once again relying on it because of the
financial crisis as a possibility for targeting civil fraud concerning financial institutions.
(Viswanatha, Aruna, 2013) (Stempel, Jonathan, 2012) On May 8, 2013, U.S. District Judge Jed
Rakoff issued a two–page ruling that dismissed the claims in the lawsuit seeking penalties under the
False Claims Act, but allowed the claims that sought penalties under Financial Institutions Reform,
Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) to advance. The relevance of the False Claims Act and
the FIRREA Law will be further explored in this case. (Viswanatha, Aruna, 2013) The False Claims
Act The False Claims Act, also known as the "Lincoln Law" is an American federal law that holds
persons and companies accountable for abusing governmental programs. However, the law includes
a "qui tam" provision that allows people without government ties to file actions on behalf of the
government. This is also referred to as "whistleblowing". The Act prohibits such measures as
knowingly presenting false claims for payment or approval,
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...