The document provides details of an IT system certification conducted by Verifavia for Kyma AS's EU MRV Module software. It includes information on the applicant and developer, the IT system certified, fuel consumption methodologies considered, types of ships supported, and verification activities undertaken including a site visit. The opinion provided is that the IT system was found to be in compliance with the EU MRV Regulation and ISO standards for software engineering based on the certification assessment. Some minor recommended improvements were also noted.
Verifavia Shipping certified on June 1st 2017 that the EU MRV IT system KYMA Office Web –EU MRV Module v1.0.0 developed by Kyma AS complies with EU MRV regulations, commission implementing regulations, and delegated regulation. This certificate attests that Verifavia conducted the relevant approval procedure for the IT system and found it complies with the requirements, and will expire on June 2nd 2018.
Kwise Logistics is a Chinese logistics company headquartered in Qingdao, China that offers supply chain management and international freight services. It provides integrated solutions across various areas including supply chain management, e-commerce, sea and air freight, project logistics, IT services, and supply chain finance. Kwise aims to help global enterprises enhance competitiveness through optimizing their supply chains and cross-border logistics using its solutions and services.
CCIS-EXPERTISE is an international audit and advisory company that offers regulatory compliance services to help companies expand into international markets like Russia, CIS countries, and the Customs Union. They have over 20 years of experience providing services like product certification, testing, and staff training to help clients navigate local regulations. CCIS-EXPERTISE can assist companies throughout a project from design to manufacturing to regulatory approval and risk management.
This document discusses establishing a European quality label and certification process to support eHealth interoperability. It proposes designing a harmonized process that operates with existing country-specific processes. This would benefit healthcare providers through a unified European market and ability to exchange data between regions and nations, and benefit industry through a single recognized European quality label and avoidance of duplicate testing. A functional model and case studies from France and the epSOS project are presented and guidelines are provided for deploying quality label and certification processes.
The document describes the European Union's ETV verification process for innovative environmental technologies. The 6-step process includes: 1) contact with the verification body, 2) proposal submission, 3) protocol preparation, 4) testing, 5) assessment and verification, and 6) publication. RESCOLL is an accredited verification body that guides companies through the process and issues a Statement of Verification once performance claims are independently validated. ETV verification provides third-party validation of claims to help boost market recognition and buyer confidence.
This document outlines the process for obtaining UKAS accreditation for laboratory calibration and testing. It involves deciding the calibration items, applying to UKAS, establishing quality systems, undergoing assessments, and maintaining accreditation. Initial costs include the laboratory, UKAS fees of £8,000-£12,000, quality manual development, equipment, and staff training. Annual maintenance costs are £3,000-£6,000 to UKAS, plus equipment calibration and maintenance, internal audits, and operating expenses. Additional consultancy services are available to help laboratories achieve and maintain accreditation.
This document outlines the process for obtaining UKAS accreditation for laboratory calibration and testing. It involves deciding the calibration items, applying to UKAS, establishing quality systems, undergoing assessments, and maintaining accreditation. Initial costs include the laboratory, UKAS fees of £8,000-£12,000, quality manual development, equipment, and staff training. Annual maintenance costs are £3,000-£6,000 to UKAS, equipment calibration and maintenance, and consultancy. PKQA Services provides assistance with accreditation through quality system development, auditing, and training.
This presentation describes the principles of qualification and validation which are applicable to the facilities, equipment, utilities and processes used for the manufacture of medicinal products. It is a GMP requirement that manufacturer’s control the critical aspects of their particular operations through qualification and validation over the life cycle of the product and process. Any planned changes to the facilities, equipment, utilities and processes, which may affect the quality of the product, should be formally documented and the impact on the validated status or control strategy assessed.
Verifavia Shipping certified on June 1st 2017 that the EU MRV IT system KYMA Office Web –EU MRV Module v1.0.0 developed by Kyma AS complies with EU MRV regulations, commission implementing regulations, and delegated regulation. This certificate attests that Verifavia conducted the relevant approval procedure for the IT system and found it complies with the requirements, and will expire on June 2nd 2018.
Kwise Logistics is a Chinese logistics company headquartered in Qingdao, China that offers supply chain management and international freight services. It provides integrated solutions across various areas including supply chain management, e-commerce, sea and air freight, project logistics, IT services, and supply chain finance. Kwise aims to help global enterprises enhance competitiveness through optimizing their supply chains and cross-border logistics using its solutions and services.
CCIS-EXPERTISE is an international audit and advisory company that offers regulatory compliance services to help companies expand into international markets like Russia, CIS countries, and the Customs Union. They have over 20 years of experience providing services like product certification, testing, and staff training to help clients navigate local regulations. CCIS-EXPERTISE can assist companies throughout a project from design to manufacturing to regulatory approval and risk management.
This document discusses establishing a European quality label and certification process to support eHealth interoperability. It proposes designing a harmonized process that operates with existing country-specific processes. This would benefit healthcare providers through a unified European market and ability to exchange data between regions and nations, and benefit industry through a single recognized European quality label and avoidance of duplicate testing. A functional model and case studies from France and the epSOS project are presented and guidelines are provided for deploying quality label and certification processes.
The document describes the European Union's ETV verification process for innovative environmental technologies. The 6-step process includes: 1) contact with the verification body, 2) proposal submission, 3) protocol preparation, 4) testing, 5) assessment and verification, and 6) publication. RESCOLL is an accredited verification body that guides companies through the process and issues a Statement of Verification once performance claims are independently validated. ETV verification provides third-party validation of claims to help boost market recognition and buyer confidence.
This document outlines the process for obtaining UKAS accreditation for laboratory calibration and testing. It involves deciding the calibration items, applying to UKAS, establishing quality systems, undergoing assessments, and maintaining accreditation. Initial costs include the laboratory, UKAS fees of £8,000-£12,000, quality manual development, equipment, and staff training. Annual maintenance costs are £3,000-£6,000 to UKAS, plus equipment calibration and maintenance, internal audits, and operating expenses. Additional consultancy services are available to help laboratories achieve and maintain accreditation.
This document outlines the process for obtaining UKAS accreditation for laboratory calibration and testing. It involves deciding the calibration items, applying to UKAS, establishing quality systems, undergoing assessments, and maintaining accreditation. Initial costs include the laboratory, UKAS fees of £8,000-£12,000, quality manual development, equipment, and staff training. Annual maintenance costs are £3,000-£6,000 to UKAS, equipment calibration and maintenance, and consultancy. PKQA Services provides assistance with accreditation through quality system development, auditing, and training.
This presentation describes the principles of qualification and validation which are applicable to the facilities, equipment, utilities and processes used for the manufacture of medicinal products. It is a GMP requirement that manufacturer’s control the critical aspects of their particular operations through qualification and validation over the life cycle of the product and process. Any planned changes to the facilities, equipment, utilities and processes, which may affect the quality of the product, should be formally documented and the impact on the validated status or control strategy assessed.
The document discusses the differences between aviation certification standards PART21G and EN9100. PART21G is the European regulation for aviation certification while EN9100 is an international quality management standard for the aerospace industry. The document outlines the requirements and objectives of EASA, the European aviation regulatory body, and describes the production organization approval (POA) process involved in PART21G certification. It also provides information on related standards organizations like IAQG and the roles of notified bodies in certifying organizations.
The document summarizes new regulations for ride safety in France following an accident in 2007. Key points include requirements for periodic technical inspections of rides by certified inspectors, compliance of new rides with the EN 13814 safety standard, and impacts on existing rides including requirements for initial and periodic inspections every 1-3 years depending on the ride category.
The Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) is establishing new frameworks for license compliance inspections and quality of service monitoring. The CA will divide the country into clusters and engage contractors to conduct inspections, monitor key performance indicators, and aggregate data. Licensees are required to submit regular compliance returns and facilitate monitoring. The goals are to independently assess quality of service, identify non-compliance, and ensure proper regulation of Kenya's information and communication technology sector.
The European Aviation Safety Agency, EASA, is coming up with regulatory changes for non-commerical operators. AIR OPS Annex VI Part-NCC obliges non-commercial operators of complex motor-powered aircraft to fulfill new legal requirements effective August 25, 2016.
In this presentation you will receive explanation on the necessary changes and the consequences for NCC operators: when talking about EASA regulations it might be difficult to read between the lines. I like to introduce you the regulatory background quickly before transferring those facts into the consequences, you – as an NCC operator – can expect from those regulatory changes.
Jeppesen and TRS Aviation Consulting have a great, joint experience in dealing with regulatory aspects and we like to show you solutions we can offer as well as what kind of processes and time periods can be estimated. Finally we take a look beyond our noses to see what additional services could be helpful for you.
No, after reviewing the document and answers provided, I understand the key aspects of the MCS certification process. Thank you for providing this information and taking the time to answer my questions.
1. The document outlines the process and requirements for obtaining accreditation from UKAS to ISO 17025 standards. This includes establishing prerequisites like a quality management system, equipment, and standards.
2. The accreditation process involves applying to UKAS, developing documentation, undergoing assessments, and ultimately obtaining accredited status. Maintaining accreditation requires ongoing costs and compliance with standards.
3. The advantages of accreditation include recognition, customer satisfaction, competitive advantages, additional revenue opportunities, and ensuring consistent and traceable practices are followed.
This document discusses the requirements for quality management systems regarding medical examinations for seafarers in Norway. It outlines that both the Norwegian Maritime Authority and doctors conducting medical exams must have a certified quality management system in accordance with international standards. The key requirements for doctors include maintaining competence in maritime medicine, participating in training, having the proper equipment, and implementing a quality system. The document also provides an overview of the components of a quality management system, including establishing processes, monitoring effectiveness, ensuring resource availability, implementing improvements, and having a quality policy.
GSA Info-Session to present the "Second EGNOS adoption aviation call for grants". Scope, objectives, criteria and description of the call.
Presented by Carmen Aguilera and Katerina Strelcova during a webinar aimed to introduce to the participants the call for grant.
The document summarizes an aerodrome certification workshop that took place in Paris, France from 18-20 December 2018. It discusses the objectives of the workshop which were to provide insight into aerodrome certification requirements and processes, and to develop participants' skills and knowledge in areas like aerodrome certification and safety management. The document also outlines aspects of aerodrome certification requirements in the Chicago Convention and ICAO Annex 14, and guidance on certification procedures from ICAO Document 9774.
1. The document describes the VETQI certification system and evaluation guide for assessing adherence to the EQAVET quality assurance framework. It provides manuals for VET providers and ICT SMEs and different trademarks and certificates available through the VETQI project, including Quality Labels, Supporter status, and Quality Approved certification.
2. The certification process involves VET providers and ICT SMEs completing a self-assessment using the VETQI system, undergoing an audit, and if passed, receiving the appropriate Quality Approved certificate. Guidelines are also provided for how audits will be evaluated and results reported.
3. The evaluation guide contains the criteria and weights for indicators used to assess responses in the VET
The document summarizes changes made from ISO/TS 16949 to the new IATF 16949 standard. Key changes include strengthening requirements around product safety, corporate responsibility, process reviews, and risk analysis. A multi-phase revision process was used and over 1,700 stakeholder comments were received. The goal of the changes is to better address quality management system needs in the automotive industry and prevent quality problems.
Presentation Workshop Beograd Octobar2012Miodrag Huber
1. The document outlines the legal framework and certification scheme for entities in charge of maintenance (ECM) and maintenance workshops according to the Railway Safety Directive and other regulations.
2. It establishes requirements for ECM and maintenance workshop certification systems regarding management functions, maintenance delivery functions, and risk assessment.
3. Certification provides evidence that an ECM has established a maintenance system to ensure the safe operation of any freight wagon it maintains and is carried out by a national accreditation body according to European standards.
This presentation is referred to the future exploitation of the Leonardo Da Vinci Development of Innovation project called VETQI - VET Quality in ICT - www.vetqi.eu -
The 2021 Interactive Cargo Webinar presents the progress of the IATA Interactive Cargo project. More details at www.iata.org/interactive-cargo.
14:00-14:30 The IATA Interactive Cargo project achievements and next steps
This presentation will give an overview of the Interactive Cargo project’s achievements: (1) The recommended practice on IoT device data sharing in air cargo, (2) The recommended practice on the approval of the use of portable electronic devices onboard aircraft for air cargo, and (3) the amendment to the conditions of carriage for cargo.
Sonia Ben Hamida, Project Manager Interactive Cargo, IATA
Carlos Tornero, Deputy General Counsel, IATA
14:30-14:45 Safely and efficiently approving the use of cargo tracking devices
The presentation will share the progress of the pilot project “Approval of the use of Portable Electronic Devices (PEDs) approval for air cargo”. The goals of this pilot are to adopt the IATA recommended practice and checklists for the approval of Portable Electronic Devices (PEDs) onboard aircraft for air cargo in order to standardize information required for approval and decrease the total duration required for carriers to complete an approval request.
Jeff Clark, Founder & CEO, 7PSolutions, LLC
14:45-15:00 Sharing IoT device data in air cargo with ONE Record: Outcomes and lessons learnt
The presentation will share the progress of the pilot project “Visibility, Tracking and Alerts at the Piece Level”. The goals of this pilot are to demonstrate autonomous delivery of in-shipment status messaging and sensor-based alerts, mirror Cargo iQ milestones in cargo facilities, and track ULDs integrated with tracking devices.
Tomal Sohoral, Manager, Cargo Solutions Strategy and Business Development, Air Canada Cargo
15:00-15:15 The handling of interactive cargo: Main challenges and potential solutions
The use of smart tracking devices presents shippers and cargo owners with the ability to monitor not just the whereabouts of air cargo shipments but also their physical condition and their immediate environment. But these are sophisticated devices, often powered by lithium batteries with some models capable of interacting with local devices and transmitting data in-flight. Shippers respect and appreciate the need for clear rules for the use of these devices yet they sit in a hybrid regulatory environment - part-dangerous goods, part-perishable load, part-radio communications device and part-data logger able to interact with third party systems. So, there is a data privacy and protection issue too.
GSF has been supporting and encouraging the air cargo community in its development of processes and procedures for the handling and acceptance of these devices and this presentation will set out the shippers’ perspectives and expectations of procedures that will make the use of these devices as seamless and trouble-free as possible.
James Hookham, Secretary General, Global Shippers Forum
This document introduces changes to China's certification procedure and implementation rules for compulsory certification of audio/video and information technology products. Key points include: 1) Allowing type testing and factory inspections to be done in parallel for overseas factories; 2) Requiring a factory quality assurance statement be submitted with applications; 3) Specifying certification modes including type testing with follow-up inspections; and 4) Classifying factories from A to D based on inspection results, with more frequent inspections for lower classes.
The document outlines the CANplus certification program for wood pellets in Canada. It states that the CANplus program accepts ENplus certification as equivalent and organizations certified under ENplus are eligible for CANplus upon signing a trademark license agreement. The certification process involves obtaining ENplus certification, filling out a CANplus application, and undergoing simultaneous audits for both certifications going forward. The document also provides details on use of the CANplus certification seal, fees, and termination of certification.
This document summarizes a webinar for a call for proposals to support adoption of EGNOS, Europe's satellite navigation system, in aviation. It outlines the objectives to award grants totaling €10 million to foster EGNOS implementation. The call is seeking proposals in six areas, including developing approach procedures and retrofitting aircraft with EGNOS avionics. Eligible applicants are from EU and EFTA countries. Proposals will be evaluated on relevance, impact, and work plan coherence and awarded funding of up to 60% of costs.
PIC/S Guide to GMP PE009-13 - Key changes to Annex 15 - Qualification and val...TGA Australia
The TGA has now legislated version 13 of the PIC/S guide to GMP for medicinal products with a transition period for implementation ending at the end of 2018. Some of the biggest changes in this version were in Annex 15 – Qualification and Validation. This has an impact across all areas in including small to medium sized manufacturers as well as sponsors who need to understand the impact in their supply chain including contract manufacturing and storage and transportation.
The document discusses the differences between aviation certification standards PART21G and EN9100. PART21G is the European regulation for aviation certification while EN9100 is an international quality management standard for the aerospace industry. The document outlines the requirements and objectives of EASA, the European aviation regulatory body, and describes the production organization approval (POA) process involved in PART21G certification. It also provides information on related standards organizations like IAQG and the roles of notified bodies in certifying organizations.
The document summarizes new regulations for ride safety in France following an accident in 2007. Key points include requirements for periodic technical inspections of rides by certified inspectors, compliance of new rides with the EN 13814 safety standard, and impacts on existing rides including requirements for initial and periodic inspections every 1-3 years depending on the ride category.
The Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) is establishing new frameworks for license compliance inspections and quality of service monitoring. The CA will divide the country into clusters and engage contractors to conduct inspections, monitor key performance indicators, and aggregate data. Licensees are required to submit regular compliance returns and facilitate monitoring. The goals are to independently assess quality of service, identify non-compliance, and ensure proper regulation of Kenya's information and communication technology sector.
The European Aviation Safety Agency, EASA, is coming up with regulatory changes for non-commerical operators. AIR OPS Annex VI Part-NCC obliges non-commercial operators of complex motor-powered aircraft to fulfill new legal requirements effective August 25, 2016.
In this presentation you will receive explanation on the necessary changes and the consequences for NCC operators: when talking about EASA regulations it might be difficult to read between the lines. I like to introduce you the regulatory background quickly before transferring those facts into the consequences, you – as an NCC operator – can expect from those regulatory changes.
Jeppesen and TRS Aviation Consulting have a great, joint experience in dealing with regulatory aspects and we like to show you solutions we can offer as well as what kind of processes and time periods can be estimated. Finally we take a look beyond our noses to see what additional services could be helpful for you.
No, after reviewing the document and answers provided, I understand the key aspects of the MCS certification process. Thank you for providing this information and taking the time to answer my questions.
1. The document outlines the process and requirements for obtaining accreditation from UKAS to ISO 17025 standards. This includes establishing prerequisites like a quality management system, equipment, and standards.
2. The accreditation process involves applying to UKAS, developing documentation, undergoing assessments, and ultimately obtaining accredited status. Maintaining accreditation requires ongoing costs and compliance with standards.
3. The advantages of accreditation include recognition, customer satisfaction, competitive advantages, additional revenue opportunities, and ensuring consistent and traceable practices are followed.
This document discusses the requirements for quality management systems regarding medical examinations for seafarers in Norway. It outlines that both the Norwegian Maritime Authority and doctors conducting medical exams must have a certified quality management system in accordance with international standards. The key requirements for doctors include maintaining competence in maritime medicine, participating in training, having the proper equipment, and implementing a quality system. The document also provides an overview of the components of a quality management system, including establishing processes, monitoring effectiveness, ensuring resource availability, implementing improvements, and having a quality policy.
GSA Info-Session to present the "Second EGNOS adoption aviation call for grants". Scope, objectives, criteria and description of the call.
Presented by Carmen Aguilera and Katerina Strelcova during a webinar aimed to introduce to the participants the call for grant.
The document summarizes an aerodrome certification workshop that took place in Paris, France from 18-20 December 2018. It discusses the objectives of the workshop which were to provide insight into aerodrome certification requirements and processes, and to develop participants' skills and knowledge in areas like aerodrome certification and safety management. The document also outlines aspects of aerodrome certification requirements in the Chicago Convention and ICAO Annex 14, and guidance on certification procedures from ICAO Document 9774.
1. The document describes the VETQI certification system and evaluation guide for assessing adherence to the EQAVET quality assurance framework. It provides manuals for VET providers and ICT SMEs and different trademarks and certificates available through the VETQI project, including Quality Labels, Supporter status, and Quality Approved certification.
2. The certification process involves VET providers and ICT SMEs completing a self-assessment using the VETQI system, undergoing an audit, and if passed, receiving the appropriate Quality Approved certificate. Guidelines are also provided for how audits will be evaluated and results reported.
3. The evaluation guide contains the criteria and weights for indicators used to assess responses in the VET
The document summarizes changes made from ISO/TS 16949 to the new IATF 16949 standard. Key changes include strengthening requirements around product safety, corporate responsibility, process reviews, and risk analysis. A multi-phase revision process was used and over 1,700 stakeholder comments were received. The goal of the changes is to better address quality management system needs in the automotive industry and prevent quality problems.
Presentation Workshop Beograd Octobar2012Miodrag Huber
1. The document outlines the legal framework and certification scheme for entities in charge of maintenance (ECM) and maintenance workshops according to the Railway Safety Directive and other regulations.
2. It establishes requirements for ECM and maintenance workshop certification systems regarding management functions, maintenance delivery functions, and risk assessment.
3. Certification provides evidence that an ECM has established a maintenance system to ensure the safe operation of any freight wagon it maintains and is carried out by a national accreditation body according to European standards.
This presentation is referred to the future exploitation of the Leonardo Da Vinci Development of Innovation project called VETQI - VET Quality in ICT - www.vetqi.eu -
The 2021 Interactive Cargo Webinar presents the progress of the IATA Interactive Cargo project. More details at www.iata.org/interactive-cargo.
14:00-14:30 The IATA Interactive Cargo project achievements and next steps
This presentation will give an overview of the Interactive Cargo project’s achievements: (1) The recommended practice on IoT device data sharing in air cargo, (2) The recommended practice on the approval of the use of portable electronic devices onboard aircraft for air cargo, and (3) the amendment to the conditions of carriage for cargo.
Sonia Ben Hamida, Project Manager Interactive Cargo, IATA
Carlos Tornero, Deputy General Counsel, IATA
14:30-14:45 Safely and efficiently approving the use of cargo tracking devices
The presentation will share the progress of the pilot project “Approval of the use of Portable Electronic Devices (PEDs) approval for air cargo”. The goals of this pilot are to adopt the IATA recommended practice and checklists for the approval of Portable Electronic Devices (PEDs) onboard aircraft for air cargo in order to standardize information required for approval and decrease the total duration required for carriers to complete an approval request.
Jeff Clark, Founder & CEO, 7PSolutions, LLC
14:45-15:00 Sharing IoT device data in air cargo with ONE Record: Outcomes and lessons learnt
The presentation will share the progress of the pilot project “Visibility, Tracking and Alerts at the Piece Level”. The goals of this pilot are to demonstrate autonomous delivery of in-shipment status messaging and sensor-based alerts, mirror Cargo iQ milestones in cargo facilities, and track ULDs integrated with tracking devices.
Tomal Sohoral, Manager, Cargo Solutions Strategy and Business Development, Air Canada Cargo
15:00-15:15 The handling of interactive cargo: Main challenges and potential solutions
The use of smart tracking devices presents shippers and cargo owners with the ability to monitor not just the whereabouts of air cargo shipments but also their physical condition and their immediate environment. But these are sophisticated devices, often powered by lithium batteries with some models capable of interacting with local devices and transmitting data in-flight. Shippers respect and appreciate the need for clear rules for the use of these devices yet they sit in a hybrid regulatory environment - part-dangerous goods, part-perishable load, part-radio communications device and part-data logger able to interact with third party systems. So, there is a data privacy and protection issue too.
GSF has been supporting and encouraging the air cargo community in its development of processes and procedures for the handling and acceptance of these devices and this presentation will set out the shippers’ perspectives and expectations of procedures that will make the use of these devices as seamless and trouble-free as possible.
James Hookham, Secretary General, Global Shippers Forum
This document introduces changes to China's certification procedure and implementation rules for compulsory certification of audio/video and information technology products. Key points include: 1) Allowing type testing and factory inspections to be done in parallel for overseas factories; 2) Requiring a factory quality assurance statement be submitted with applications; 3) Specifying certification modes including type testing with follow-up inspections; and 4) Classifying factories from A to D based on inspection results, with more frequent inspections for lower classes.
The document outlines the CANplus certification program for wood pellets in Canada. It states that the CANplus program accepts ENplus certification as equivalent and organizations certified under ENplus are eligible for CANplus upon signing a trademark license agreement. The certification process involves obtaining ENplus certification, filling out a CANplus application, and undergoing simultaneous audits for both certifications going forward. The document also provides details on use of the CANplus certification seal, fees, and termination of certification.
This document summarizes a webinar for a call for proposals to support adoption of EGNOS, Europe's satellite navigation system, in aviation. It outlines the objectives to award grants totaling €10 million to foster EGNOS implementation. The call is seeking proposals in six areas, including developing approach procedures and retrofitting aircraft with EGNOS avionics. Eligible applicants are from EU and EFTA countries. Proposals will be evaluated on relevance, impact, and work plan coherence and awarded funding of up to 60% of costs.
PIC/S Guide to GMP PE009-13 - Key changes to Annex 15 - Qualification and val...TGA Australia
The TGA has now legislated version 13 of the PIC/S guide to GMP for medicinal products with a transition period for implementation ending at the end of 2018. Some of the biggest changes in this version were in Annex 15 – Qualification and Validation. This has an impact across all areas in including small to medium sized manufacturers as well as sponsors who need to understand the impact in their supply chain including contract manufacturing and storage and transportation.
Open Source Contributions to Postgres: The Basics POSETTE 2024ElizabethGarrettChri
Postgres is the most advanced open-source database in the world and it's supported by a community, not a single company. So how does this work? How does code actually get into Postgres? I recently had a patch submitted and committed and I want to share what I learned in that process. I’ll give you an overview of Postgres versions and how the underlying project codebase functions. I’ll also show you the process for submitting a patch and getting that tested and committed.
Build applications with generative AI on Google CloudMárton Kodok
We will explore Vertex AI - Model Garden powered experiences, we are going to learn more about the integration of these generative AI APIs. We are going to see in action what the Gemini family of generative models are for developers to build and deploy AI-driven applications. Vertex AI includes a suite of foundation models, these are referred to as the PaLM and Gemini family of generative ai models, and they come in different versions. We are going to cover how to use via API to: - execute prompts in text and chat - cover multimodal use cases with image prompts. - finetune and distill to improve knowledge domains - run function calls with foundation models to optimize them for specific tasks. At the end of the session, developers will understand how to innovate with generative AI and develop apps using the generative ai industry trends.
ViewShift: Hassle-free Dynamic Policy Enforcement for Every Data LakeWalaa Eldin Moustafa
Dynamic policy enforcement is becoming an increasingly important topic in today’s world where data privacy and compliance is a top priority for companies, individuals, and regulators alike. In these slides, we discuss how LinkedIn implements a powerful dynamic policy enforcement engine, called ViewShift, and integrates it within its data lake. We show the query engine architecture and how catalog implementations can automatically route table resolutions to compliance-enforcing SQL views. Such views have a set of very interesting properties: (1) They are auto-generated from declarative data annotations. (2) They respect user-level consent and preferences (3) They are context-aware, encoding a different set of transformations for different use cases (4) They are portable; while the SQL logic is only implemented in one SQL dialect, it is accessible in all engines.
#SQL #Views #Privacy #Compliance #DataLake
Predictably Improve Your B2B Tech Company's Performance by Leveraging DataKiwi Creative
Harness the power of AI-backed reports, benchmarking and data analysis to predict trends and detect anomalies in your marketing efforts.
Peter Caputa, CEO at Databox, reveals how you can discover the strategies and tools to increase your growth rate (and margins!).
From metrics to track to data habits to pick up, enhance your reporting for powerful insights to improve your B2B tech company's marketing.
- - -
This is the webinar recording from the June 2024 HubSpot User Group (HUG) for B2B Technology USA.
Watch the video recording at https://youtu.be/5vjwGfPN9lw
Sign up for future HUG events at https://events.hubspot.com/b2b-technology-usa/
Beyond the Basics of A/B Tests: Highly Innovative Experimentation Tactics You...Aggregage
This webinar will explore cutting-edge, less familiar but powerful experimentation methodologies which address well-known limitations of standard A/B Testing. Designed for data and product leaders, this session aims to inspire the embrace of innovative approaches and provide insights into the frontiers of experimentation!
Codeless Generative AI Pipelines
(GenAI with Milvus)
https://ml.dssconf.pl/user.html#!/lecture/DSSML24-041a/rate
Discover the potential of real-time streaming in the context of GenAI as we delve into the intricacies of Apache NiFi and its capabilities. Learn how this tool can significantly simplify the data engineering workflow for GenAI applications, allowing you to focus on the creative aspects rather than the technical complexities. I will guide you through practical examples and use cases, showing the impact of automation on prompt building. From data ingestion to transformation and delivery, witness how Apache NiFi streamlines the entire pipeline, ensuring a smooth and hassle-free experience.
Timothy Spann
https://www.youtube.com/@FLaNK-Stack
https://medium.com/@tspann
https://www.datainmotion.dev/
milvus, unstructured data, vector database, zilliz, cloud, vectors, python, deep learning, generative ai, genai, nifi, kafka, flink, streaming, iot, edge
Mrv it system_certification_report_kyma_verifavia_vf
1. Name of applicant: KYMA AS
Address of applicant: Aasamyrane 88b, N-5116, Ulset, Norway
Name of developer: Kyma R & D Department
Address of developer: Aasamyrane 88b, N-5116, Ulset, Norway
Name of IT system: KSP Office Web- EU MRV Module v1.0.0
Fuel consumption methodologies considered:
Method A Yes
Method B Yes
Method C Yes
Method D No
Type of ships considered for the determination of cargo
carried (as per the draft Implementing Act on Cargo Carried
published by the EC in July 2016 ):
Passenger Yes
Ro-ro Yes
Container Yes
Oil tanker Yes
Chemical tanker Yes
LNG carrier Yes
Gas carrier Yes
Bulk carrier Yes
General cargo Yes
Refrigerated cargo Yes
Vehicle carrier Yes
Combination carrier Yes
Ro-pax Yes
Container / ro-ro cargo Yes
Independent EU MRV IT System Certification Report Opinion Statement -
Regulation 2015/757
IT SYSTEM SUPPLIER DETAILS
IT SYSTEM DETAILS
EU MRV IT System Certification
MRV_IT_system_CERTIFICATION_REPORT_KYMA_Verifavia_v3/
OPINION 1/8 Printed : 02/06/2017/12:41
2. Site visited during certification: Yes
Date(s) of visit(s): 01.03.2017
Number of days for site visit: 1
Name of (lead) auditor(s) and technical experts
undertaking site visit(s):
Yuvraj Thakur, Nicolas Duchêne
Justification for not undertaking site visit: N/A
System tested in detail: Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Functionality: Yes
Reliability: Yes
User friendliness: Yes
Efficiency: Yes
Maintainability: Yes
Transferability: Yes
Quality of operations: Yes
Organisation: Yes
Data backup: Yes
Data protection: Yes
Computer virus protection concept: Yes
Hard and software management: Yes
Archiving: Yes
Patch and change management: Yes
Requirements management: Yes
COMPLIANCE WITH SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS (ISO IEC 25051 Software Engineering)
COMPLIANCE WITH SOFTWARE SECURITY REQUIREMENTS (ISO IEC 25051 Software Engineering)
Monitoring Plan requirements met:
EU Regulation on per-voyage Reporting met:
COMPLIANCE WITH EU MRV RULES
EU Regulation on Monitoring met:
EU Regulation on annual Reporting met:
SITE VERIFICATION DETAILS
MRV_IT_system_CERTIFICATION_REPORT_KYMA_Verifavia_v3/
OPINION 2/8 Printed : 02/06/2017/12:41
3. OPINION - certified as satisfactory: VERIFAVIA (UK) LTD has conducted a certification of the EU MRV IT system KYMA EU
MRV Module developed and managed by KYMA AS as presented above. On the basis of
the certification work undertaken based on the agreed criteria (see Annex 2), the EU MRV
IT system is considered to be in compliance with the requirements of the Regulation (EU)
N° 2015/757, the associated Delegated and Implementing Acts and the ISO IEC 25051
standard on software engineering.
OPINION
MRV_IT_system_CERTIFICATION_REPORT_KYMA_Verifavia_v3/
OPINION 3/8 Printed : 02/06/2017/12:41
4. Lead Auditor: Nicolas Duchêne
Auditor(s): Yuvraj Thakur
Technical Expert(s): N/a
Independent Reviewer: Julien Dufour
Technical Expert(s) (Independent Review): N/a
Signed on behalf of VERIFAVIA (UK) LTD:
Name of authorised signatory : Julien Dufour
Date of Certificate : 01.06.2017
Name of verifier: VERIFAVIA (UK) LTD
Contact Address : 20-22 Wenlock Road, London N1 7GU, United Kingdom
Tel: +33 665 697 489
Email: julien.dufour@verifavia.com
Date of certification contract: 23.12.2016
CERTIFICATION TEAM
MRV_IT_system_CERTIFICATION_REPORT_KYMA_Verifavia_v3/
OPINION 4/8 Printed : 02/06/2017/12:41
5. KYMA AS
A Uncorrected Non-compliances with Shipping MRV Regulation which were identified during certification
A1 NOT APPLICABLE
A2
A3
A4
A5
B Recommended Improvements, if any
B1 The EU MRV module should provide information to the user about the definition of EU MRV ports of call. The user
should be informed about EU MRV 'voyage' and 'port of call' definitions.
B2 A functionality to build automatically the list of EU MRV voyages would be more robust than relying on user manual
entries only.
B3 The EU MRV module must consider consider outermost regions as EU when defining EU MRV ports of call. It should
provide information to the user about the definition of EU MRV ports of call. The user should be informed about EU
MRV 'voyage' and 'port of call' definitions
B4 The system does not allow the reporting of optional parameters by a ship operator (fuel used to heat cargo, dynamic
positioning, fuel / distance / time travelled through ice, etc.) as listed in Reg. 2016/1927.
B5
B6
B7
B8
B9
B10
B11
B12
B13
B14
B15
B16
B17
B18
B19
B20
C. Prior certification Non-compliances that have NOT been resolved.
Any prior year Non-compliances reported in the previous Certification Report that have been resolved do not
need to be listed here.
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
Certification Report - Shipping MRV Regulation
EU MRV IT System Certification
Annex 1A - Non-compliances, Observations and Recommended Improvements
MRV_IT_system_CERTIFICATION_REPORT_KYMA_Verifavia_v3/
Annex 1 5/8 Printed : 02/06/2017/12:41
6. Objectives and scope
of the Certification:
To certify that the EU MRV IT system complies with the Regulation (EU) N° 2015/757.
Work performed &
basis of the opinion:
We conducted our examination having regard to the certification criteria reference documents outlined below.
This involved examining evidence and testing the system to give us assurance that the system has been
properly developed in accordance with the relevant Regulations and standards.
1) REGULATION (EU) 2015/757 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 29 April 2015
on the monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport, and amending
Directive 2009/16/EC
2) Implementing and Delegated Acts pursuant to REGULATION (EU) 2015/757 :
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2072 of 26 September 2016 on the verification activities and
accreditation of verifiers
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2071 of 26 September 2016 amending Regulation (EU)
2015/757 as regards the methods for monitoring carbon dioxide emissions and the rules for monitoring other
relevant information
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1927 of 4 November 2016 on templates for monitoring
plans, emissions reports and documents of compliance
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1928 of 4 November 2016 on determination of cargo carried
for categories of ships other than passenger, ro-ro and container ships
3) ISO 17067 Conformity assessment – Requirements for bodies certifying products, processes and services
4) ISO 14065:2013 Greenhouse gases. Requirements for greenhouse gas validation and verification bodies for
use in accreditation or other forms of recognition
5) ISO/IEC 25051:2014 - Software engineering -- Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation
(SQuaRE) -- Requirements for quality of Ready to Use Software Product (RUSP) and instructions for testing
Certification Report - Shipping MRV Regulation
EU MRV IT System Certification
KYMA AS
Reference documents
cited :
Annex 2 - Further information of relevance to the Opinion
MRV_IT_system_CERTIFICATION_REPORT_KYMA_Verifavia_v3/
Annex 2 6/8 Printed : 02/06/2017/12:41
7. 1 It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure that the system is supplied is in strict conformity with the
corresponding VERIFAVIA Certificate.
2 The applicant is responsible for recording any change in the system in software release documentation which
must forwarded to VERIFAVIA for evaluation and approval on request. Major changes should be approved by
VERIFAVIA before being deployed in the software.
3 The applicant shall only make reference to VERIFAVIA, VERIFAVIA Logo or Mark, or VERIFAVIA’s name in
advertising or otherwise, for systems that have been certified by VERIFAVIA.
4 The applicant must not mislead purchasers by claiming performance not covered by the certification.
5 The applicant shall maintain a record of all complaints and any remedial action relative to the certified system.
Such records must be available for VERIFAVIA’s review on request.
6 When promoting the system, the applicant shall not imply that the verification would be simpler, easier, faster or
less expensive if VERIFAVIA or any other verification body is used for the verification of the carbon emissions
report of the system's user.
1 VERIFAVIA undertakes to make available for download in its website a copy of the certificate and to include a
description of the general nature of the work undertaken for the applicant.
2 VERIFAVIA undertakes to maintain records of relevant documentation, such as test reports, for the duration of
the Certification (i.e. while certification remains valid).
3 VERIFAVIA undertakes to protect the confidentiality of information received in the course of its services.
4 Any complaint to VERIFAVIA made with respect to VERIFAVIA Certification may be referred to VERIFAVIA’s
CEO, who may direct a special examination to be held according to VERIFAVIA's Complaints and Appeals
procedure.
5 The interpretation of these procedures is the sole responsibility, and the sole discretion, of VERIFAVIA.
6 The applicant shall maintain a record of all complaints and any remedial action relative to the certified system.
Such records must be available for VERIFAVIA’s review on request.
1 When a VERIFAVIA certificate has been issued and whilst it remains valid, the applicant is authorised to use a
VERIFAVIA Logo or Mark under the terms and conditions agreed at the time of approval. This Logo or Mark may
be used by the applicant on any packaging for the system, promotional material or to the system itself.
2 The applicant hereby agrees that VERIFAVIA may identify the applicant and system by name and logo and the
general nature of the work undertaken for the applicant in the VERIFAVIA marketing literature, press releases
and website.
1 Certificate is valid for one year from the date of issuance.
2 Application should be submitted to VERIFAVIA at least one month prior to the existing certificate expiry date. No
additional documentation is required if the system and specified standards are unchanged. If any of these
aspects will be changed prior to the expiry date, as required by the VERIFAVIA terms and conditions,
VERIFAVIA must be informed. Depending on the changes made, the same process may need to be followed as
for the original certificate.
B) Declaration
C) Use of the Logos and Marks
D) Renewal, Cancellation or Withdrawal of Certificates
Verification Opinion - Shipping MRV Regulation
EU MRV IT System Certification
KYMA AS
Annex 3 - Terms and conditions
A) Applicant’s Responsibility
MRV_IT_system_CERTIFICATION_REPORT_KYMA_Verifavia_v3/
Annex 3 7/8 Printed : 02/06/2017/12:41
8. 3 VERIFAVIA reserves the right to cancel a Certificate if:
• Any design changes are made to a certified system which is deemed to adversely affect the descriptive or
performance provisions under which VERIFAVIA Certificate was granted.
• Any feature of a certified system is found to be unsatisfactory in service.
• Improper use is made of the Certificate, or the VERIFAVIA Logo or Mark, or of VERIFAVIA’s name, in
marketing the system.
• Settlement of fees for VERIFAVIA’s services associated with the certification is not completed.
• Periodical Quality Assurance audits have not taken place.
4 VERIFAVIA will withdraw a Certificate if:
• The client does not wish to renew the certification.
• The system is no longer produced.
• The specific relationship between a developer producing a system under licence and the licensor no longer
applies.
5 If VERIFAVIA considers that a Certificate should be cancelled or withdrawn, the client will be informed in writing
and given the opportunity to take appropriate corrective action, or give notice of appeal.
6 VERIFAVIA reserves the right to publish details of cancelled or withdrawn certificates, together with reasons, if
considered necessary.
1 VERIFAVIA, its subsidiaries and affiliates and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and
collectively, referred to in this document as ‘VERIFAVIA’.
2 VERIFAVIA assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense
caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has
signed a contract with the relevant VERIFAVIA entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that
case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.
D) Disclaimer
MRV_IT_system_CERTIFICATION_REPORT_KYMA_Verifavia_v3/
Annex 3 8/8 Printed : 02/06/2017/12:41