SlideShare a Scribd company logo
T.C. Summary Opinion 2009-15



                      UNITED STATES TAX COURT



     HOWARD CARY MORRIS AND VICKY L. MORRIS, Petitioners v.
          COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent



     Docket No. 10416-07S.             Filed January 28, 2009.



     Howard Cary Morris, pro se.

     John R. Bampfield, for respondent.



     KROUPA, Judge:   This case was heard pursuant to the

provisions of section 74631 of the Internal Revenue Code in

effect at the time the petition was filed.   Pursuant to section

7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any

other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent

for any other case.




     1
      All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code for
the taxable year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax
Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.
-2-

     Respondent determined a $1,174 deficiency in petitioners’

Federal income tax for 2004, and petitioners timely filed a

petition with this Court.   After concessions,2 the only issue

remaining is whether petitioners may offset their realized

long-term capital gains by negative taxable income3 before

offsetting such gains by long-term capital loss carryover.     We

hold they may not.

                            Background
     This case was submitted fully stipulated under Rule 122.

The stipulation of facts, the supplemental stipulation of facts,

the stipulation of settled issues, and the accompanying exhibits

are incorporated by this reference.   Petitioners resided in

Tennessee at the time they filed the petition.

     Petitioners filed a joint Federal income tax return for 2004

and attached a handwritten letter stating they found the Schedule

D, Capital Gains and Losses, too complicated to complete.

Petitioner husband mailed respondent a handwritten computation

and a letter after receiving the deficiency notice.   Petitioners

claimed a $23,000 net long-term capital loss in 2002, which

petitioners carried over to both 2003 and 2004.   The parties

disagree about how the long-term capital loss carryover from 2003

to 2004 is calculated.

     2
      The parties settled issues involving unreported capital
gains in 2004, some of which were not taxable, and associated
early withdrawal additional taxes under sec. 72(t).
     3
      Negative taxable income, as used in this opinion, means
taxable income that is less than zero, without including capital
gains and/or losses in the computation.
-3-

     The parties stipulated that, if petitioners’ position is

correct, then the amount of long-term capital loss carryover to

2004 is $9,629.   This would reduce their 2004 net long-term

capital gain to zero and result in a $651 deficiency for 2004.4

If we find for respondent, however, the amount of long-term

capital loss carryover is $5,807, reducing their net long-term

capital gain to $953 and resulting in a $698 deficiency.

                            Discussion

     We decide whether petitioners may offset their realized

long-term capital gains by negative taxable income5 before

offsetting such gains with long-term capital loss carryover.

Petitioners contend this method of computation reflects Congress’

intent that the use of capital loss carryovers in a bad year

should be delayed to offset capital gains in a good year.    We

disagree with petitioners given the clear language of the

applicable statutes.

     We begin with the burden of proof.   Where, as here, the key

facts are fully stipulated and we are faced with a question of

law, our holding does not depend on the burden of proof we impose

or standard of review we apply.    We must reject erroneous views

of the law.   See Kendricks v. Commissioner, 124 T.C. 69, 75


     4
      In addition, petitioners would have a long-term capital
loss carryover from 2004 to 2005.
     5
      Petitioners’ taxable income for 2003 was negative $3,822
without taking into account their capital gains and losses.
Petitioners reported $20,486 of adjusted gross income in 2003,
excluding their capital gains. They claimed $18,208 of itemized
deductions and two personal exemptions totaling $6,100.
-4-

(2005) (and the cases cited thereat); McCorkle v. Commissioner,

124 T.C. 56, 63 (2005).

     We now turn to the proper method for determining long-term

capital loss carryover.     Petitioners argue that they should be

allowed to deduct negative taxable income from long-term capital

gain and preserve long-term capital loss carryover for the

following year.   They argue that section 1(h)(1) “basically” says

the capital gains rules do not apply if the resulting tax would

be greater than if all or part of the capital gains had been

treated as ordinary income.     They further argue that their income

tax for 2003 was zero and the only way they could determine

whether the tax would be lower is to see if they would pay more

or less tax in 2004.    We disagree with their interpretation.

Instead we hold for respondent because of the clear statutory

language governing capital losses.

     First and foremost, the capital gains tax rates are limited

to certain situations and do not affect the calculation of a

capital loss carryover.     Sec. 1(h)(1).   Petitioners’ reliance on

this section is misplaced.     Further, a specific statute controls

over a general statute in a situation where two sections might

arguably apply.   Spring City Foundry Co. v. Commissioner, 292

U.S. 182, 189 (1934).    Petitioners’ position contradicts the

specific statutes governing the interaction between taxable

income and capital losses.

     Taxable income is defined as gross income less allowable

deductions.   Sec. 63(a).    It is well settled that tax deductions
-5-

are a matter of legislative grace, and taxpayers must show that

they come squarely within the terms of the law conferring the

benefit sought.    Rule 142(a); INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner, 503

U.S. 79, 84 (1992); New Colonial Ice Co. v. Helvering, 292 U.S.

435, 440 (1934).    A loss from the sale or exchange of a capital

asset is allowed as a deduction only to the extent permitted in

sections 1211 and 1212.    Sec. 165(a), (f).   Consequently, a

capital loss can affect taxable income in limited circumstances.

Negative taxable income does not determine capital losses.

     Capital losses for noncorporate taxpayers are deductible

only to the extent of capital gains plus $3,000.6    Sec. 1211.

When capital losses exceed capital gains by more than $3,000, the

excess may be carried over to later taxable years to reduce

capital gains or a nominal amount of ordinary income.     Sec.

1212(b).

     A long-term capital gain is the gain from the sale of a

capital asset held for longer than a year.     Sec. 1222(3).

Conversely, a long-term capital loss is the loss from the sale of

a capital asset held for longer than a year.     Sec. 1222(4).    A

net long-term capital loss is the excess of long-term capital

losses minus long-term capital gains for a taxable year.       Sec.

1222(8).    Petitioners had a $23,000 net long-term capital loss in

2002.    This amount was carried over to 2003 as a long-term

capital loss.     See sec. 1212(b).

     6
      Capital losses are allowed in full where an individual
taxpayer’s capital losses exceed capital gains by less than
$3,000. Sec. 1211(b)(2).
-6-

     Petitioners realized long-term capital gains of $20,842 and

incurred long-term capital losses of $3,649 in 2003.     Sec.

1222(3) and (4).   Accordingly petitioners’ long-term capital

gains exceeded the amount of actually realized long-term capital

losses by $17,193 that year.   All long-term capital gains and

losses must be incorporated, however, to calculate petitioners’

net long-term capital loss for 2003.     See sec. 1222(8).

Consequently, petitioners’ net long-term capital loss for 2003 is

$5,807 ($3,649, 2003 long-term capital loss + $23,000, net long-

term capital loss carryover - $20,842, 2003 long-term capital

gain).

     Petitioners may carry over their net long-term capital loss

minus any short-term capital gain from 2003 to 2004.     Sec.

1212(b)(1)(B).   Petitioners had no short-term capital gain in

2003.    Accordingly, we find the amount of long-term capital loss

carryover into 2004 is $5,807 and the resulting deficiency for

2004 is $698.    This is consistent with the parties’ stipulation

if we hold for respondent, and we do.

     To reflect the foregoing and the concessions of the parties,


                                           Decision will be entered

                                       under Rule 155.

More Related Content

What's hot

2013 cch basic principles ch18
2013 cch basic principles ch182013 cch basic principles ch18
2013 cch basic principles ch18
dphil002
 
2013 cch basic principles ch11
2013 cch basic principles ch112013 cch basic principles ch11
2013 cch basic principles ch11
dphil002
 
Smith v. commissioner
Smith v. commissionerSmith v. commissioner
Smith v. commissioner
jrbampfield
 
2013 cch basic principles ch08
2013 cch basic principles ch082013 cch basic principles ch08
2013 cch basic principles ch08
dphil002
 
Dispute Resolution in Islamic Finance
Dispute Resolution in Islamic FinanceDispute Resolution in Islamic Finance
Dispute Resolution in Islamic Finance
Camille Silla Paldi
 
gov revenue formsandresources forms M2
gov revenue formsandresources forms M2gov revenue formsandresources forms M2
gov revenue formsandresources forms M2
taxman taxman
 
2013 cch basic principles ch12
2013 cch basic principles ch122013 cch basic principles ch12
2013 cch basic principles ch12
dphil002
 
SBA COMMENTS B-408633
SBA   COMMENTS   B-408633SBA   COMMENTS   B-408633
SBA COMMENTS B-408633
Keven Barnes
 
Section - 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, A Saving Beacon
Section - 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, A Saving BeaconSection - 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, A Saving Beacon
Section - 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, A Saving Beacon
Singhania2015
 
2013 cch basic principles ch09
2013 cch basic principles ch092013 cch basic principles ch09
2013 cch basic principles ch09
dphil002
 
Realogy 8-KFiling_12908
Realogy  8-KFiling_12908Realogy  8-KFiling_12908
Realogy 8-KFiling_12908
finance35
 
gov revenue formsandresources forms M1
gov revenue formsandresources forms M1gov revenue formsandresources forms M1
gov revenue formsandresources forms M1
taxman taxman
 
Proposal for Dubai World Islamic Finance Arbitration Centre (DWIFAC) and Juri...
Proposal for Dubai World Islamic Finance Arbitration Centre (DWIFAC) and Juri...Proposal for Dubai World Islamic Finance Arbitration Centre (DWIFAC) and Juri...
Proposal for Dubai World Islamic Finance Arbitration Centre (DWIFAC) and Juri...
Camille Silla Paldi
 
2013 cch basic principles ch16 pii
2013 cch basic principles ch16 pii2013 cch basic principles ch16 pii
2013 cch basic principles ch16 pii
dphil002
 
Official Records of a Condominium Association
Official Records of a Condominium AssociationOfficial Records of a Condominium Association
Official Records of a Condominium Association
Dirk Spahn
 
NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PROOF OF CLAIMS DUE 1/15/14
NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PROOF OF CLAIMS DUE 1/15/14NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PROOF OF CLAIMS DUE 1/15/14
NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PROOF OF CLAIMS DUE 1/15/14
mzamoralaw
 
2013 cch basic principles ch03
2013 cch basic principles ch032013 cch basic principles ch03
2013 cch basic principles ch03
dphil002
 
CSC The UCC & Fixtures
CSC The UCC & FixturesCSC The UCC & Fixtures
CSC The UCC & Fixtures
James Wier
 
How to Prepare Closing Documents in a Residential Real Estate Transaction
How to Prepare Closing Documents in a Residential Real Estate TransactionHow to Prepare Closing Documents in a Residential Real Estate Transaction
How to Prepare Closing Documents in a Residential Real Estate Transaction
Karen Alridge
 

What's hot (19)

2013 cch basic principles ch18
2013 cch basic principles ch182013 cch basic principles ch18
2013 cch basic principles ch18
 
2013 cch basic principles ch11
2013 cch basic principles ch112013 cch basic principles ch11
2013 cch basic principles ch11
 
Smith v. commissioner
Smith v. commissionerSmith v. commissioner
Smith v. commissioner
 
2013 cch basic principles ch08
2013 cch basic principles ch082013 cch basic principles ch08
2013 cch basic principles ch08
 
Dispute Resolution in Islamic Finance
Dispute Resolution in Islamic FinanceDispute Resolution in Islamic Finance
Dispute Resolution in Islamic Finance
 
gov revenue formsandresources forms M2
gov revenue formsandresources forms M2gov revenue formsandresources forms M2
gov revenue formsandresources forms M2
 
2013 cch basic principles ch12
2013 cch basic principles ch122013 cch basic principles ch12
2013 cch basic principles ch12
 
SBA COMMENTS B-408633
SBA   COMMENTS   B-408633SBA   COMMENTS   B-408633
SBA COMMENTS B-408633
 
Section - 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, A Saving Beacon
Section - 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, A Saving BeaconSection - 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, A Saving Beacon
Section - 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, A Saving Beacon
 
2013 cch basic principles ch09
2013 cch basic principles ch092013 cch basic principles ch09
2013 cch basic principles ch09
 
Realogy 8-KFiling_12908
Realogy  8-KFiling_12908Realogy  8-KFiling_12908
Realogy 8-KFiling_12908
 
gov revenue formsandresources forms M1
gov revenue formsandresources forms M1gov revenue formsandresources forms M1
gov revenue formsandresources forms M1
 
Proposal for Dubai World Islamic Finance Arbitration Centre (DWIFAC) and Juri...
Proposal for Dubai World Islamic Finance Arbitration Centre (DWIFAC) and Juri...Proposal for Dubai World Islamic Finance Arbitration Centre (DWIFAC) and Juri...
Proposal for Dubai World Islamic Finance Arbitration Centre (DWIFAC) and Juri...
 
2013 cch basic principles ch16 pii
2013 cch basic principles ch16 pii2013 cch basic principles ch16 pii
2013 cch basic principles ch16 pii
 
Official Records of a Condominium Association
Official Records of a Condominium AssociationOfficial Records of a Condominium Association
Official Records of a Condominium Association
 
NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PROOF OF CLAIMS DUE 1/15/14
NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PROOF OF CLAIMS DUE 1/15/14NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PROOF OF CLAIMS DUE 1/15/14
NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PROOF OF CLAIMS DUE 1/15/14
 
2013 cch basic principles ch03
2013 cch basic principles ch032013 cch basic principles ch03
2013 cch basic principles ch03
 
CSC The UCC & Fixtures
CSC The UCC & FixturesCSC The UCC & Fixtures
CSC The UCC & Fixtures
 
How to Prepare Closing Documents in a Residential Real Estate Transaction
How to Prepare Closing Documents in a Residential Real Estate TransactionHow to Prepare Closing Documents in a Residential Real Estate Transaction
How to Prepare Closing Documents in a Residential Real Estate Transaction
 

Viewers also liked

Retreat track b final al-peter
Retreat track b final al-peterRetreat track b final al-peter
Retreat track b final al-peter
T Kleckner
 
Dialoghi Platonici - Anatoli Vassiliev
Dialoghi Platonici - Anatoli VassilievDialoghi Platonici - Anatoli Vassiliev
Dialoghi Platonici - Anatoli Vassiliev
Nicola Camurri
 
The shifting healthcare system realities after reform
The shifting healthcare system   realities after reformThe shifting healthcare system   realities after reform
The shifting healthcare system realities after reform
longelaine
 
Innovative Solutions Final Bid Presentation
Innovative Solutions Final Bid PresentationInnovative Solutions Final Bid Presentation
Innovative Solutions Final Bid Presentation
ayounce
 
9 Immutable Laws
9 Immutable Laws9 Immutable Laws
9 Immutable Laws
Vivastream
 
CDINFORMA, NÚMERO 2615, 19 DE ELUL DE 5773, MÉXICO D.F. A 25 DE AGOSTO DE 2013
CDINFORMA, NÚMERO 2615, 19 DE ELUL DE 5773, MÉXICO D.F. A 25 DE AGOSTO DE 2013CDINFORMA, NÚMERO 2615, 19 DE ELUL DE 5773, MÉXICO D.F. A 25 DE AGOSTO DE 2013
CDINFORMA, NÚMERO 2615, 19 DE ELUL DE 5773, MÉXICO D.F. A 25 DE AGOSTO DE 2013
Centro Deportivo Israelita
 
Scientists should have a business education
Scientists should have a business education Scientists should have a business education
Scientists should have a business education
Ari Massoudi
 
Abdul kalam
Abdul kalamAbdul kalam
Abdul kalam
Kasthuri Rengan
 

Viewers also liked (8)

Retreat track b final al-peter
Retreat track b final al-peterRetreat track b final al-peter
Retreat track b final al-peter
 
Dialoghi Platonici - Anatoli Vassiliev
Dialoghi Platonici - Anatoli VassilievDialoghi Platonici - Anatoli Vassiliev
Dialoghi Platonici - Anatoli Vassiliev
 
The shifting healthcare system realities after reform
The shifting healthcare system   realities after reformThe shifting healthcare system   realities after reform
The shifting healthcare system realities after reform
 
Innovative Solutions Final Bid Presentation
Innovative Solutions Final Bid PresentationInnovative Solutions Final Bid Presentation
Innovative Solutions Final Bid Presentation
 
9 Immutable Laws
9 Immutable Laws9 Immutable Laws
9 Immutable Laws
 
CDINFORMA, NÚMERO 2615, 19 DE ELUL DE 5773, MÉXICO D.F. A 25 DE AGOSTO DE 2013
CDINFORMA, NÚMERO 2615, 19 DE ELUL DE 5773, MÉXICO D.F. A 25 DE AGOSTO DE 2013CDINFORMA, NÚMERO 2615, 19 DE ELUL DE 5773, MÉXICO D.F. A 25 DE AGOSTO DE 2013
CDINFORMA, NÚMERO 2615, 19 DE ELUL DE 5773, MÉXICO D.F. A 25 DE AGOSTO DE 2013
 
Scientists should have a business education
Scientists should have a business education Scientists should have a business education
Scientists should have a business education
 
Abdul kalam
Abdul kalamAbdul kalam
Abdul kalam
 

Similar to Morris v. commissioner

Mc clanahan v. commissioner
Mc clanahan v. commissionerMc clanahan v. commissioner
Mc clanahan v. commissioner
jrbampfield
 
Slater v. commissioner
Slater v. commissionerSlater v. commissioner
Slater v. commissioner
jrbampfield
 
Garrin v. commissioner
Garrin v. commissionerGarrin v. commissioner
Garrin v. commissioner
jrbampfield
 
Selph v. commissioner
Selph v. commissionerSelph v. commissioner
Selph v. commissioner
jrbampfield
 
Selph v. commissioner
Selph v. commissionerSelph v. commissioner
Selph v. commissioner
jrbampfield
 
Kannard v. commissioner
Kannard v. commissionerKannard v. commissioner
Kannard v. commissioner
jrbampfield
 
98765432123Tax-1-Cases-Finals-Partnership-Deductions-Withholding-taxes.docx
98765432123Tax-1-Cases-Finals-Partnership-Deductions-Withholding-taxes.docx98765432123Tax-1-Cases-Finals-Partnership-Deductions-Withholding-taxes.docx
98765432123Tax-1-Cases-Finals-Partnership-Deductions-Withholding-taxes.docx
LaraMichelleSandayBi
 
MS Shoes
MS ShoesMS Shoes
MS Shoes
Pavan Sachdeva
 
MS Shoes
MS ShoesMS Shoes
Power Of Strategy1031 Strategies
Power Of Strategy1031 StrategiesPower Of Strategy1031 Strategies
Power Of Strategy1031 Strategies
atlbill
 
Frazier v. commissioner
Frazier v. commissionerFrazier v. commissioner
Frazier v. commissioner
jrbampfield
 
2009.08.07 nance sued by Introgen debtors for excessive expenditures
2009.08.07 nance sued by Introgen debtors for excessive expenditures2009.08.07 nance sued by Introgen debtors for excessive expenditures
2009.08.07 nance sued by Introgen debtors for excessive expenditures
Hindenburg Research
 
Gaela Gehring Flores: What to consider when initiating an investment arbitration
Gaela Gehring Flores: What to consider when initiating an investment arbitrationGaela Gehring Flores: What to consider when initiating an investment arbitration
Gaela Gehring Flores: What to consider when initiating an investment arbitration
Investment Arbitration Forum - Foro de Arbitraje en Materia de Inversión - Investitionsschutzforum
 
TAL305 Taxation Law.docx
TAL305 Taxation Law.docxTAL305 Taxation Law.docx
TAL305 Taxation Law.docx
4934bk
 
Pearce v. commissioner
Pearce v. commissionerPearce v. commissioner
Pearce v. commissioner
jrbampfield
 
Tax Research Memorandum To Bruce Wilson From .docx
 Tax Research Memorandum   To Bruce Wilson   From .docx Tax Research Memorandum   To Bruce Wilson   From .docx
Tax Research Memorandum To Bruce Wilson From .docx
aryan532920
 
Caparo 1
Caparo 1Caparo 1
Caparo 1
FAROUQ
 
Major Relief against Double Taxation_MAG
Major Relief against Double Taxation_MAGMajor Relief against Double Taxation_MAG
Major Relief against Double Taxation_MAG
Manish Anil Gupta & Co. - A CA firm in Delhi, India
 
Colin Harris and Mark Kenney
Colin Harris and Mark KenneyColin Harris and Mark Kenney
Colin Harris and Mark Kenney
Resolution Institute
 
UCC Basics 101-United Corporate Services, Inc.
UCC Basics 101-United Corporate Services, Inc.UCC Basics 101-United Corporate Services, Inc.
UCC Basics 101-United Corporate Services, Inc.
UCSConnect
 

Similar to Morris v. commissioner (20)

Mc clanahan v. commissioner
Mc clanahan v. commissionerMc clanahan v. commissioner
Mc clanahan v. commissioner
 
Slater v. commissioner
Slater v. commissionerSlater v. commissioner
Slater v. commissioner
 
Garrin v. commissioner
Garrin v. commissionerGarrin v. commissioner
Garrin v. commissioner
 
Selph v. commissioner
Selph v. commissionerSelph v. commissioner
Selph v. commissioner
 
Selph v. commissioner
Selph v. commissionerSelph v. commissioner
Selph v. commissioner
 
Kannard v. commissioner
Kannard v. commissionerKannard v. commissioner
Kannard v. commissioner
 
98765432123Tax-1-Cases-Finals-Partnership-Deductions-Withholding-taxes.docx
98765432123Tax-1-Cases-Finals-Partnership-Deductions-Withholding-taxes.docx98765432123Tax-1-Cases-Finals-Partnership-Deductions-Withholding-taxes.docx
98765432123Tax-1-Cases-Finals-Partnership-Deductions-Withholding-taxes.docx
 
MS Shoes
MS ShoesMS Shoes
MS Shoes
 
MS Shoes
MS ShoesMS Shoes
MS Shoes
 
Power Of Strategy1031 Strategies
Power Of Strategy1031 StrategiesPower Of Strategy1031 Strategies
Power Of Strategy1031 Strategies
 
Frazier v. commissioner
Frazier v. commissionerFrazier v. commissioner
Frazier v. commissioner
 
2009.08.07 nance sued by Introgen debtors for excessive expenditures
2009.08.07 nance sued by Introgen debtors for excessive expenditures2009.08.07 nance sued by Introgen debtors for excessive expenditures
2009.08.07 nance sued by Introgen debtors for excessive expenditures
 
Gaela Gehring Flores: What to consider when initiating an investment arbitration
Gaela Gehring Flores: What to consider when initiating an investment arbitrationGaela Gehring Flores: What to consider when initiating an investment arbitration
Gaela Gehring Flores: What to consider when initiating an investment arbitration
 
TAL305 Taxation Law.docx
TAL305 Taxation Law.docxTAL305 Taxation Law.docx
TAL305 Taxation Law.docx
 
Pearce v. commissioner
Pearce v. commissionerPearce v. commissioner
Pearce v. commissioner
 
Tax Research Memorandum To Bruce Wilson From .docx
 Tax Research Memorandum   To Bruce Wilson   From .docx Tax Research Memorandum   To Bruce Wilson   From .docx
Tax Research Memorandum To Bruce Wilson From .docx
 
Caparo 1
Caparo 1Caparo 1
Caparo 1
 
Major Relief against Double Taxation_MAG
Major Relief against Double Taxation_MAGMajor Relief against Double Taxation_MAG
Major Relief against Double Taxation_MAG
 
Colin Harris and Mark Kenney
Colin Harris and Mark KenneyColin Harris and Mark Kenney
Colin Harris and Mark Kenney
 
UCC Basics 101-United Corporate Services, Inc.
UCC Basics 101-United Corporate Services, Inc.UCC Basics 101-United Corporate Services, Inc.
UCC Basics 101-United Corporate Services, Inc.
 

More from jrbampfield

Smith v. commissioner
Smith v. commissionerSmith v. commissioner
Smith v. commissioner
jrbampfield
 
Perkins v. commissioner
Perkins v. commissionerPerkins v. commissioner
Perkins v. commissioner
jrbampfield
 
Perkins v. commissioner
Perkins v. commissionerPerkins v. commissioner
Perkins v. commissioner
jrbampfield
 
Perkins v. commissioner
Perkins v. commissionerPerkins v. commissioner
Perkins v. commissioner
jrbampfield
 
Maselli v. commissioner
Maselli v. commissionerMaselli v. commissioner
Maselli v. commissioner
jrbampfield
 
Leahy v. commissioner
Leahy v. commissionerLeahy v. commissioner
Leahy v. commissioner
jrbampfield
 
Hoffenberg v. commissioner
Hoffenberg v. commissionerHoffenberg v. commissioner
Hoffenberg v. commissioner
jrbampfield
 
Claborn v. commissioner
Claborn v. commissionerClaborn v. commissioner
Claborn v. commissioner
jrbampfield
 

More from jrbampfield (8)

Smith v. commissioner
Smith v. commissionerSmith v. commissioner
Smith v. commissioner
 
Perkins v. commissioner
Perkins v. commissionerPerkins v. commissioner
Perkins v. commissioner
 
Perkins v. commissioner
Perkins v. commissionerPerkins v. commissioner
Perkins v. commissioner
 
Perkins v. commissioner
Perkins v. commissionerPerkins v. commissioner
Perkins v. commissioner
 
Maselli v. commissioner
Maselli v. commissionerMaselli v. commissioner
Maselli v. commissioner
 
Leahy v. commissioner
Leahy v. commissionerLeahy v. commissioner
Leahy v. commissioner
 
Hoffenberg v. commissioner
Hoffenberg v. commissionerHoffenberg v. commissioner
Hoffenberg v. commissioner
 
Claborn v. commissioner
Claborn v. commissionerClaborn v. commissioner
Claborn v. commissioner
 

Recently uploaded

Letter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdf
Letter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdfLetter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdf
Letter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdf
bhavenpr
 
Gabriel Whitley's Motion Summary Judgment
Gabriel Whitley's Motion Summary JudgmentGabriel Whitley's Motion Summary Judgment
Gabriel Whitley's Motion Summary Judgment
Abdul-Hakim Shabazz
 
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptxEssential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Pragencyuk
 
MAGNA CARTA (minimum 40 characters required)
MAGNA CARTA (minimum 40 characters required)MAGNA CARTA (minimum 40 characters required)
MAGNA CARTA (minimum 40 characters required)
Filippo64
 
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf2015pmkemenhub163.pdf 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
CIkumparan
 
What Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s Invasion
What Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s InvasionWhat Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s Invasion
What Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s Invasion
LUMINATIVE MEDIA/PROJECT COUNSEL MEDIA GROUP
 
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdf
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdfAcolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdf
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdf
46adnanshahzad
 
Hindustan Insider 2nd edition release now
Hindustan Insider 2nd edition release nowHindustan Insider 2nd edition release now
Hindustan Insider 2nd edition release now
hindustaninsider22
 
EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023
EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023
EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023
El Estrecho Digital
 

Recently uploaded (9)

Letter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdf
Letter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdfLetter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdf
Letter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdf
 
Gabriel Whitley's Motion Summary Judgment
Gabriel Whitley's Motion Summary JudgmentGabriel Whitley's Motion Summary Judgment
Gabriel Whitley's Motion Summary Judgment
 
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptxEssential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
 
MAGNA CARTA (minimum 40 characters required)
MAGNA CARTA (minimum 40 characters required)MAGNA CARTA (minimum 40 characters required)
MAGNA CARTA (minimum 40 characters required)
 
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf2015pmkemenhub163.pdf 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
 
What Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s Invasion
What Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s InvasionWhat Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s Invasion
What Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s Invasion
 
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdf
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdfAcolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdf
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdf
 
Hindustan Insider 2nd edition release now
Hindustan Insider 2nd edition release nowHindustan Insider 2nd edition release now
Hindustan Insider 2nd edition release now
 
EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023
EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023
EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023
 

Morris v. commissioner

  • 1. T.C. Summary Opinion 2009-15 UNITED STATES TAX COURT HOWARD CARY MORRIS AND VICKY L. MORRIS, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 10416-07S. Filed January 28, 2009. Howard Cary Morris, pro se. John R. Bampfield, for respondent. KROUPA, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 74631 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time the petition was filed. Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case. 1 All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code for the taxable year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.
  • 2. -2- Respondent determined a $1,174 deficiency in petitioners’ Federal income tax for 2004, and petitioners timely filed a petition with this Court. After concessions,2 the only issue remaining is whether petitioners may offset their realized long-term capital gains by negative taxable income3 before offsetting such gains by long-term capital loss carryover. We hold they may not. Background This case was submitted fully stipulated under Rule 122. The stipulation of facts, the supplemental stipulation of facts, the stipulation of settled issues, and the accompanying exhibits are incorporated by this reference. Petitioners resided in Tennessee at the time they filed the petition. Petitioners filed a joint Federal income tax return for 2004 and attached a handwritten letter stating they found the Schedule D, Capital Gains and Losses, too complicated to complete. Petitioner husband mailed respondent a handwritten computation and a letter after receiving the deficiency notice. Petitioners claimed a $23,000 net long-term capital loss in 2002, which petitioners carried over to both 2003 and 2004. The parties disagree about how the long-term capital loss carryover from 2003 to 2004 is calculated. 2 The parties settled issues involving unreported capital gains in 2004, some of which were not taxable, and associated early withdrawal additional taxes under sec. 72(t). 3 Negative taxable income, as used in this opinion, means taxable income that is less than zero, without including capital gains and/or losses in the computation.
  • 3. -3- The parties stipulated that, if petitioners’ position is correct, then the amount of long-term capital loss carryover to 2004 is $9,629. This would reduce their 2004 net long-term capital gain to zero and result in a $651 deficiency for 2004.4 If we find for respondent, however, the amount of long-term capital loss carryover is $5,807, reducing their net long-term capital gain to $953 and resulting in a $698 deficiency. Discussion We decide whether petitioners may offset their realized long-term capital gains by negative taxable income5 before offsetting such gains with long-term capital loss carryover. Petitioners contend this method of computation reflects Congress’ intent that the use of capital loss carryovers in a bad year should be delayed to offset capital gains in a good year. We disagree with petitioners given the clear language of the applicable statutes. We begin with the burden of proof. Where, as here, the key facts are fully stipulated and we are faced with a question of law, our holding does not depend on the burden of proof we impose or standard of review we apply. We must reject erroneous views of the law. See Kendricks v. Commissioner, 124 T.C. 69, 75 4 In addition, petitioners would have a long-term capital loss carryover from 2004 to 2005. 5 Petitioners’ taxable income for 2003 was negative $3,822 without taking into account their capital gains and losses. Petitioners reported $20,486 of adjusted gross income in 2003, excluding their capital gains. They claimed $18,208 of itemized deductions and two personal exemptions totaling $6,100.
  • 4. -4- (2005) (and the cases cited thereat); McCorkle v. Commissioner, 124 T.C. 56, 63 (2005). We now turn to the proper method for determining long-term capital loss carryover. Petitioners argue that they should be allowed to deduct negative taxable income from long-term capital gain and preserve long-term capital loss carryover for the following year. They argue that section 1(h)(1) “basically” says the capital gains rules do not apply if the resulting tax would be greater than if all or part of the capital gains had been treated as ordinary income. They further argue that their income tax for 2003 was zero and the only way they could determine whether the tax would be lower is to see if they would pay more or less tax in 2004. We disagree with their interpretation. Instead we hold for respondent because of the clear statutory language governing capital losses. First and foremost, the capital gains tax rates are limited to certain situations and do not affect the calculation of a capital loss carryover. Sec. 1(h)(1). Petitioners’ reliance on this section is misplaced. Further, a specific statute controls over a general statute in a situation where two sections might arguably apply. Spring City Foundry Co. v. Commissioner, 292 U.S. 182, 189 (1934). Petitioners’ position contradicts the specific statutes governing the interaction between taxable income and capital losses. Taxable income is defined as gross income less allowable deductions. Sec. 63(a). It is well settled that tax deductions
  • 5. -5- are a matter of legislative grace, and taxpayers must show that they come squarely within the terms of the law conferring the benefit sought. Rule 142(a); INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, 84 (1992); New Colonial Ice Co. v. Helvering, 292 U.S. 435, 440 (1934). A loss from the sale or exchange of a capital asset is allowed as a deduction only to the extent permitted in sections 1211 and 1212. Sec. 165(a), (f). Consequently, a capital loss can affect taxable income in limited circumstances. Negative taxable income does not determine capital losses. Capital losses for noncorporate taxpayers are deductible only to the extent of capital gains plus $3,000.6 Sec. 1211. When capital losses exceed capital gains by more than $3,000, the excess may be carried over to later taxable years to reduce capital gains or a nominal amount of ordinary income. Sec. 1212(b). A long-term capital gain is the gain from the sale of a capital asset held for longer than a year. Sec. 1222(3). Conversely, a long-term capital loss is the loss from the sale of a capital asset held for longer than a year. Sec. 1222(4). A net long-term capital loss is the excess of long-term capital losses minus long-term capital gains for a taxable year. Sec. 1222(8). Petitioners had a $23,000 net long-term capital loss in 2002. This amount was carried over to 2003 as a long-term capital loss. See sec. 1212(b). 6 Capital losses are allowed in full where an individual taxpayer’s capital losses exceed capital gains by less than $3,000. Sec. 1211(b)(2).
  • 6. -6- Petitioners realized long-term capital gains of $20,842 and incurred long-term capital losses of $3,649 in 2003. Sec. 1222(3) and (4). Accordingly petitioners’ long-term capital gains exceeded the amount of actually realized long-term capital losses by $17,193 that year. All long-term capital gains and losses must be incorporated, however, to calculate petitioners’ net long-term capital loss for 2003. See sec. 1222(8). Consequently, petitioners’ net long-term capital loss for 2003 is $5,807 ($3,649, 2003 long-term capital loss + $23,000, net long- term capital loss carryover - $20,842, 2003 long-term capital gain). Petitioners may carry over their net long-term capital loss minus any short-term capital gain from 2003 to 2004. Sec. 1212(b)(1)(B). Petitioners had no short-term capital gain in 2003. Accordingly, we find the amount of long-term capital loss carryover into 2004 is $5,807 and the resulting deficiency for 2004 is $698. This is consistent with the parties’ stipulation if we hold for respondent, and we do. To reflect the foregoing and the concessions of the parties, Decision will be entered under Rule 155.