Monitoring officer 22 jan 2021 r
•
0 likes•484 views
The letter responds to a complaint by noting that the matter has been exhaustively dealt with through the internal complaints procedure and council policy. It states that further investigations will not be conducted since an ombudsman investigation is underway, and that allegations of criminal conduct by a deputy lack evidence and credibility. The complainant is advised to take independent legal advice or refer unsubstantiated allegations to the police. The council asserts it has acted appropriately regarding a liability order.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Misconduct in public office 26 nov 2020 redact
A host of allegations of misconduct, implicating senior officers at North East Lincolnshire Council, Humberside police, Local Government Ombudsman, Information Commissioner etc. Primarily concerning the council's legal department refusing to acknowledge or respond to any correspondence regarding proven allegation and evidence of criminal wrongdoing. As a consequence of the criminal negligence, the person affected has been engaged continuously with either the police, various Ombudsmen and other regulatory bodies but without justice as they have all been proven to be complicit in related matters.
No investigation perverting course of justice
Humberside Police's refusal to investigate allegations of perverting the course of justice on the grounds that the complaint is vexatious, tending to or intended to vex/worry/annoy officers. Allegations are that the officer has pursued a deliberate course of action to affect the course of justice; by intentionally frustrating a police investigation into serious crime to enable potential defendants to evade arrest or commit further offences. The 17 April 2019 investigation outcome along with correspondence entered into in the matter between 2 February and 30 March 2019 supports incontrovertibly that the investigation was staged to effect a cover up of serious criminal wrongdoing to vindicate the accused. An account briefly summarising each aspect of the alleged conduct relating only to allegation (1) as referred to in the investigation outcome letter of 17 April 2019 is provided in the annex to this form. Further details relating to allegations (2) an (3) may be provided as and when required. A complaint is suitable for local resolution if the appropriate authority is satisfied that the conduct being complained about, even if proven, would not justify criminal or disciplinary proceedings against the person being complained about. The conduct being complained about in this complaint would without any question if proven justify criminal and disciplinary proceedings against the person being complained about so this complaint is clearly not suitable for local resolution. It is not a repetitive complaint because I have never made a complaint about the named officer perverting the course of justice or a complaint of any sort for that matter.
Perverting course of justice annex a-b
Humberside Police's refusal to investigate allegations of perverting the course of justice on the grounds that the complaint is vexatious, tending to or intended to vex/worry/annoy officers. Allegations are that the officer has pursued a deliberate course of action to affect the course of justice; by intentionally frustrating a police investigation into serious crime to enable potential defendants to evade arrest or commit further offences. The 17 April 2019 investigation outcome along with correspondence entered into in the matter between 2 February and 30 March 2019 supports incontrovertibly that the investigation was staged to effect a cover up of serious criminal wrongdoing to vindicate the accused. An account briefly summarising each aspect of the alleged conduct relating only to allegation (1) as referred to in the investigation outcome letter of 17 April 2019 is provided in the annex to this form. Further details relating to allegations (2) an (3) may be provided as and when required. A complaint is suitable for local resolution if the appropriate authority is satisfied that the conduct being complained about, even if proven, would not justify criminal or disciplinary proceedings against the person being complained about. The conduct being complained about in this complaint would without any question if proven justify criminal and disciplinary proceedings against the person being complained about so this complaint is clearly not suitable for local resolution. It is not a repetitive complaint because I have never made a complaint about the named officer perverting the course of justice or a complaint of any sort for that matter.
Iopc outcome 26 aug 2020 r
IOPC’s criminally handled appeal outcome letter dated 26 August 2020. Concerns Humberside Police's refusal to investigate allegations of perverting the course of justice on the grounds that the complaint is vexatious, tending to or intended to vex/worry/annoy officers. Allegations are that the officer has pursued a deliberate course of action to affect the course of justice; by intentionally frustrating a police investigation into serious crime to enable potential defendants to evade arrest or commit further offences. The 17 April 2019 investigation outcome along with correspondence entered into in the matter between 2 February and 30 March 2019 supports incontrovertibly that the investigation was staged to effect a cover up of serious criminal wrongdoing to vindicate the accused. An account briefly summarising each aspect of the alleged conduct relating only to allegation (1) as referred to in the investigation outcome letter of 17 April 2019 is provided in the annex to this form. Further details relating to allegations (2) an (3) may be provided as and when required. A complaint is suitable for local resolution if the appropriate authority is satisfied that the conduct being complained about, even if proven, would not justify criminal or disciplinary proceedings against the person being complained about. The conduct being complained about in this complaint would without any question if proven justify criminal and disciplinary proceedings against the person being complained about so this complaint is clearly not suitable for local resolution. It is not a repetitive complaint because I have never made a complaint about the named officer perverting the course of justice or a complaint of any sort for that matter
Ipcc 29 august 2017 redact
Independent Office of Police Conduct (IOPC) directing Humberside Police to re-investigate complaint. This matter concerns a police conduct complaint submitted 8 November 2015 which was initially dealt with by way of Local Resolution. The outcome (which was appealed and referred to the IOPC) was provided on 3 April 2017. On completing the review, the IOPC deemed the statutory conditions were not met for the matter to be suitable for local resolution and directed the force to fully investigate the complaint, taking into consideration further information such as evidence in support of alleged collusion between the police, CPS and Courts.
Exhibit a 7
Supporting document (Exhibit A-7) to Appellant’s notice of appeal against a Decision Notice issued by the Information Commissioner, in accordance with rule 22 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009. Concerns requests for information made to Humberside police to obtain the number of times the phrase "YOU CANT MAKE ME" appeared in police officers witness statements. Humberside Police relied on section 14(1) (vexatious requests) of FOIA.
Out 535 17-appeal 49-18
Outcome of Local Resolution to a complaint (CO 535/17) into Humberside police failing to investigate criminal allegations of malfeasance and fraud involving a false claim made by Justices' clerk for Humber and South Yorkshire that 10 items of post had been sent to the complainant between 19 December 2013 and 13 December 2016 which the complainant claims never to have received, and believes they were dishonestly constructed later (to cover their tracks) to satisfy enquiries made by the judicial ombudsman (JACO). The complainant considers these matters should be investigated by Humberside Police as a Crime....//..... Appeal against the Outcome of Local Resolution to a complaint (CO 49/18) into Humberside police failing to investigate criminal allegations of malfeasance and fraud involving a false claim made by Justices' clerk for Humber and South Yorkshire that 10 items of post had been sent to the complainant between the 19/12/2013 to 22/07/2016 which the complainant claims never to have received, and believes they were dishonestly constructed later to satisfy enquiries made by the judicial ombudsman. The complainant considers these matters should be investigated by Humberside Police as a Crime
Email to psd and response
More evidence of criminal misconduct within the Humberside Police Professional Standards Department. Concerns the Police's refusal to investigate allegations of perverting the course of justice on the grounds that the complaint is vexatious, tending to or intended to vex/worry/annoy officers. Allegations are that the officer has pursued a deliberate course of action to affect the course of justice; by intentionally frustrating a police investigation into serious crime to enable potential defendants to evade arrest or commit further offences. The 17 April 2019 investigation outcome along with correspondence entered into in the matter between 2 February and 30 March 2019 supports incontrovertibly that the investigation was staged to effect a cover up of serious criminal wrongdoing to vindicate the accused. An account briefly summarising each aspect of the alleged conduct relating only to allegation (1) as referred to in the investigation outcome letter of 17 April 2019 is provided in the annex to this form. Further details relating to allegations (2) an (3) may be provided as and when required. A complaint is suitable for local resolution if the appropriate authority is satisfied that the conduct being complained about, even if proven, would not justify criminal or disciplinary proceedings against the person being complained about. The conduct being complained about in this complaint would without any question if proven justify criminal and disciplinary proceedings against the person being complained about so this complaint is clearly not suitable for local resolution. It is not a repetitive complaint because I have never made a complaint about the named officer perverting the course of justice or a complaint of any sort for that matter.
Recommended
Misconduct in public office 26 nov 2020 redact
A host of allegations of misconduct, implicating senior officers at North East Lincolnshire Council, Humberside police, Local Government Ombudsman, Information Commissioner etc. Primarily concerning the council's legal department refusing to acknowledge or respond to any correspondence regarding proven allegation and evidence of criminal wrongdoing. As a consequence of the criminal negligence, the person affected has been engaged continuously with either the police, various Ombudsmen and other regulatory bodies but without justice as they have all been proven to be complicit in related matters.
No investigation perverting course of justice
Humberside Police's refusal to investigate allegations of perverting the course of justice on the grounds that the complaint is vexatious, tending to or intended to vex/worry/annoy officers. Allegations are that the officer has pursued a deliberate course of action to affect the course of justice; by intentionally frustrating a police investigation into serious crime to enable potential defendants to evade arrest or commit further offences. The 17 April 2019 investigation outcome along with correspondence entered into in the matter between 2 February and 30 March 2019 supports incontrovertibly that the investigation was staged to effect a cover up of serious criminal wrongdoing to vindicate the accused. An account briefly summarising each aspect of the alleged conduct relating only to allegation (1) as referred to in the investigation outcome letter of 17 April 2019 is provided in the annex to this form. Further details relating to allegations (2) an (3) may be provided as and when required. A complaint is suitable for local resolution if the appropriate authority is satisfied that the conduct being complained about, even if proven, would not justify criminal or disciplinary proceedings against the person being complained about. The conduct being complained about in this complaint would without any question if proven justify criminal and disciplinary proceedings against the person being complained about so this complaint is clearly not suitable for local resolution. It is not a repetitive complaint because I have never made a complaint about the named officer perverting the course of justice or a complaint of any sort for that matter.
Perverting course of justice annex a-b
Humberside Police's refusal to investigate allegations of perverting the course of justice on the grounds that the complaint is vexatious, tending to or intended to vex/worry/annoy officers. Allegations are that the officer has pursued a deliberate course of action to affect the course of justice; by intentionally frustrating a police investigation into serious crime to enable potential defendants to evade arrest or commit further offences. The 17 April 2019 investigation outcome along with correspondence entered into in the matter between 2 February and 30 March 2019 supports incontrovertibly that the investigation was staged to effect a cover up of serious criminal wrongdoing to vindicate the accused. An account briefly summarising each aspect of the alleged conduct relating only to allegation (1) as referred to in the investigation outcome letter of 17 April 2019 is provided in the annex to this form. Further details relating to allegations (2) an (3) may be provided as and when required. A complaint is suitable for local resolution if the appropriate authority is satisfied that the conduct being complained about, even if proven, would not justify criminal or disciplinary proceedings against the person being complained about. The conduct being complained about in this complaint would without any question if proven justify criminal and disciplinary proceedings against the person being complained about so this complaint is clearly not suitable for local resolution. It is not a repetitive complaint because I have never made a complaint about the named officer perverting the course of justice or a complaint of any sort for that matter.
Iopc outcome 26 aug 2020 r
IOPC’s criminally handled appeal outcome letter dated 26 August 2020. Concerns Humberside Police's refusal to investigate allegations of perverting the course of justice on the grounds that the complaint is vexatious, tending to or intended to vex/worry/annoy officers. Allegations are that the officer has pursued a deliberate course of action to affect the course of justice; by intentionally frustrating a police investigation into serious crime to enable potential defendants to evade arrest or commit further offences. The 17 April 2019 investigation outcome along with correspondence entered into in the matter between 2 February and 30 March 2019 supports incontrovertibly that the investigation was staged to effect a cover up of serious criminal wrongdoing to vindicate the accused. An account briefly summarising each aspect of the alleged conduct relating only to allegation (1) as referred to in the investigation outcome letter of 17 April 2019 is provided in the annex to this form. Further details relating to allegations (2) an (3) may be provided as and when required. A complaint is suitable for local resolution if the appropriate authority is satisfied that the conduct being complained about, even if proven, would not justify criminal or disciplinary proceedings against the person being complained about. The conduct being complained about in this complaint would without any question if proven justify criminal and disciplinary proceedings against the person being complained about so this complaint is clearly not suitable for local resolution. It is not a repetitive complaint because I have never made a complaint about the named officer perverting the course of justice or a complaint of any sort for that matter
Ipcc 29 august 2017 redact
Independent Office of Police Conduct (IOPC) directing Humberside Police to re-investigate complaint. This matter concerns a police conduct complaint submitted 8 November 2015 which was initially dealt with by way of Local Resolution. The outcome (which was appealed and referred to the IOPC) was provided on 3 April 2017. On completing the review, the IOPC deemed the statutory conditions were not met for the matter to be suitable for local resolution and directed the force to fully investigate the complaint, taking into consideration further information such as evidence in support of alleged collusion between the police, CPS and Courts.
Exhibit a 7
Supporting document (Exhibit A-7) to Appellant’s notice of appeal against a Decision Notice issued by the Information Commissioner, in accordance with rule 22 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009. Concerns requests for information made to Humberside police to obtain the number of times the phrase "YOU CANT MAKE ME" appeared in police officers witness statements. Humberside Police relied on section 14(1) (vexatious requests) of FOIA.
Out 535 17-appeal 49-18
Outcome of Local Resolution to a complaint (CO 535/17) into Humberside police failing to investigate criminal allegations of malfeasance and fraud involving a false claim made by Justices' clerk for Humber and South Yorkshire that 10 items of post had been sent to the complainant between 19 December 2013 and 13 December 2016 which the complainant claims never to have received, and believes they were dishonestly constructed later (to cover their tracks) to satisfy enquiries made by the judicial ombudsman (JACO). The complainant considers these matters should be investigated by Humberside Police as a Crime....//..... Appeal against the Outcome of Local Resolution to a complaint (CO 49/18) into Humberside police failing to investigate criminal allegations of malfeasance and fraud involving a false claim made by Justices' clerk for Humber and South Yorkshire that 10 items of post had been sent to the complainant between the 19/12/2013 to 22/07/2016 which the complainant claims never to have received, and believes they were dishonestly constructed later to satisfy enquiries made by the judicial ombudsman. The complainant considers these matters should be investigated by Humberside Police as a Crime
Email to psd and response
More evidence of criminal misconduct within the Humberside Police Professional Standards Department. Concerns the Police's refusal to investigate allegations of perverting the course of justice on the grounds that the complaint is vexatious, tending to or intended to vex/worry/annoy officers. Allegations are that the officer has pursued a deliberate course of action to affect the course of justice; by intentionally frustrating a police investigation into serious crime to enable potential defendants to evade arrest or commit further offences. The 17 April 2019 investigation outcome along with correspondence entered into in the matter between 2 February and 30 March 2019 supports incontrovertibly that the investigation was staged to effect a cover up of serious criminal wrongdoing to vindicate the accused. An account briefly summarising each aspect of the alleged conduct relating only to allegation (1) as referred to in the investigation outcome letter of 17 April 2019 is provided in the annex to this form. Further details relating to allegations (2) an (3) may be provided as and when required. A complaint is suitable for local resolution if the appropriate authority is satisfied that the conduct being complained about, even if proven, would not justify criminal or disciplinary proceedings against the person being complained about. The conduct being complained about in this complaint would without any question if proven justify criminal and disciplinary proceedings against the person being complained about so this complaint is clearly not suitable for local resolution. It is not a repetitive complaint because I have never made a complaint about the named officer perverting the course of justice or a complaint of any sort for that matter.
Exhibit a 4
Supporting document (Exhibit A-4) to Appellant’s notice of appeal against a Decision Notice issued by the Information Commissioner, in accordance with rule 22 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009. Concerns requests for information made to Humberside police to obtain the number of times the phrase "YOU CANT MAKE ME" appeared in police officers witness statements. Humberside Police relied on section 14(1) (vexatious requests) of FOIA.
Iopc response letter before action 24 oct 19
IOPC’s 24 October response to Letter Before Action (26 September 2019) in the matter of a proposed application for judicial review of the Independent Office for Police Conduct decisions (refs: 2017/082079 and 2019/115969) in relation to appeals against Humberside Police complaint investigation outcome letters of 12 September 2018 and 7 March 2019 (refs: CO/432/15 and CO/632/18) which were dealt with unlawfully in just about every way imaginable. The initial matter (CO/432/15) concerns a police conduct complaint submitted 8 November 2015 which was initially dealt with by way of Local Resolution. The outcome (which was appealed and referred to the IOPC) was provided on 3 April 2017. On completing the review, the IOPC deemed the statutory conditions were not met for the matter to be suitable for local resolution and directed the force to fully investigate the complaint, taking into consideration further information such as evidence in support of alleged collusion between the police, CPS and Courts. Humberside Police ignored the IOPC and dealt with the complaint omitting to consider the further information and evidence and the IOPC was satisfied with how the complaint was investigated. The following matter (CO/632/18) concerns a police conduct complaint submitted inadvertently on 10 October 2018 which was deemed appropriate to be proportionately investigated. The force had – so it claimed – sent the complaint investigation outcome letter concerning CO/432/15 to the wrong address thereby failing to provide sufficient safeguard against unauthorised access, loss or damage to someone’s personal data. The letter contained details of the criminal record of the person whose data protection rights were infringed upon and the reason for his arrest. The data breach (if the letter had in fact been sent) was more severe/unfair due to the disclosed details of the criminal record relating to a wrongful conviction contributed by witnesses committing perjury (the arresting officer is suspected to have incited them). The correspondence to the police on 10 October was not intended as a formal complaint but was handled as one by the force in accordance with the complaint’s procedure under the police reform Act. The communication was predominantly to alert the force of its obligations to refer the personal data breach to the Information Commissioner and to obtain some preliminary information in anticipation of submitting a complaint (to the force) in case it was a prerequisite to raising the issue with the Commissioner. The queries were never answered and the Investigating Officer just ploughed on with the process regardless ignoring the complainant. Consequently the complainant was unable to feed into the process in respect of the information he was denied throughout the course of the investigation because it was not until it was too late when the investigation had completed that the questions he had asked were answered. The Investigation outcome revealed that....
Perjury to commit fraud 2 dec 15
Statement reporting North East Lincolnshire Council for committing perjury with intent to defraud the defendant for a hearing at Grimsby Magistrates' court in which the judge was complicit.
Letter before action 26 sept 2019 r
This letter before claim concerns a proposed application for judicial review of a decision by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) not to review findings of a police investigation. The letter provides background on the claimant's criminal case where he believes false witness statements and police misconduct occurred. It details the claimant's police complaints process regarding the witness statements and arresting officer. The letter argues the IOPC should intervene as the police complaints process was mishandled and statutory obligations were breached. The claimant seeks to challenge the IOPC's decision not to review the police investigation findings.
Sra complaint 28 november 2018 r
1. The document outlines a report made to the Solicitors Regulation Authority regarding concerns with Sally Laycock, a solicitor at Humberside Police.
2. The report alleges that Laycock improperly dealt with appeals of complaints made to Humberside Police regarding criminal allegations against a court. Laycock allegedly distorted facts and did not properly address the concerns raised.
3. The handling of the complaints by Humberside Police and appeals by Laycock involved obstruction tactics that prevented the concerns from being properly investigated according to the report. This caused significant hardship for the complainant.
Negligence obfuscation - delaying tactics etc
Evidence of Humberside Police's continued and deliberate use of obfuscation tactics to ensure that serious criminal misconduct of senior officers serving with Humberside Police, raised in July 2017, have been successfully covered up and never investigated. (Complaint refs: CO/400/18 – CO/49/18 – CO/498/17 – CO/886/17 – CO/535/17).
Exhibit a 3
Supporting document (Exhibit A-3) to Appellant’s notice of appeal against a Decision Notice issued by the Information Commissioner, in accordance with rule 22 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009. Concerns requests for information made to Humberside police to obtain the number of times the phrase "YOU CANT MAKE ME" appeared in police officers witness statements. Humberside Police relied on section 14(1) (vexatious requests) of FOIA.
Rollits Employment Law Update
Legal newsletter on Employment Law featuring articles on Fees update, Sexual harassment claims, Mental health in the workplace and the Gig economy
Discontinue 12 june 19 co498-17
Discontinuance request submitted by the Professional Standards Department to the Humberside Police Appeals Body (HPAB). Evidence of Humberside Police's continued and deliberate use of obfuscation tactics to ensure that serious criminal misconduct of senior officers serving with Humberside Police, raised in July 2017, have been successfully covered up and never investigated. (Complaint refs: CO/400/18 – CO/49/18 – CO/498/17 – CO/886/17 – CO/535/17).
Saathik ali v state
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition in the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court to quash an FIR registered against him and others for conducting a peaceful demonstration against the CAA and NRC amendments. While there was prima facie evidence for an FIR, the court noted that no untoward incidents occurred during the peaceful protest. Since continued prosecution was not warranted given the lack of violence, the court quashed the FIR to secure the ends of justice, with the benefit also applying to the non-petitioning accused mentioned in the FIR.
Exhibit a 5
Supporting document (Exhibit A-5) to Appellant’s notice of appeal against a Decision Notice issued by the Information Commissioner, in accordance with rule 22 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009. Concerns requests for information made to Humberside police to obtain the number of times the phrase "YOU CANT MAKE ME" appeared in police officers witness statements. Humberside Police relied on section 14(1) (vexatious requests) of FOIA.
Madras hc apr 1 order uidai
The court document discusses a case regarding a political party in Puducherry that allegedly conducted an unauthorized campaign by sending bulk SMS messages to citizens' phones linked to their Aadhar cards without permission from the Election Commission. The court notes serious privacy concerns and orders the Election Commission and UIDAI to investigate how the political party accessed personal citizen information. The court will hear the case again in 6 weeks to receive answers from the respondent authorities regarding compliance with election rules and protection of citizen privacy.
March 26 order
The court document discusses a case regarding a political party allegedly obtaining and using personal voter details without permission for campaigning in violation of conduct codes. The court notes the election authority has not fully investigated how the data was leaked. It directs the authority to immediately determine how the political party accessed the information and take appropriate action. The court also notes the election commission has not received a letter from the party seeking permission to send bulk messages and hopes the investigation will be completed quickly followed by proper steps. The matter is scheduled for another hearing on March 31.
IPC sections | Indian Sarais Act 1887
This document outlines several sections from Indian penal codes describing various criminal offenses and associated punishments. Some key points include:
- Workers in dangerous industries like explosives or chemicals who are injured may receive compensation from their employer of 200-1000 rupees and 6 months imprisonment.
- Kidnapping, forcing someone into begging, or attacking a woman's modesty are punishable by up to lifetime imprisonment or 1 year imprisonment and fines.
- Forgery, reckless driving causing injury, tax violations, and stalking carry potential imprisonment from 1-7 years and fines.
- Public intoxication, nuisance, or misconduct can result in 24 hours imprisonment or 1000 rupee fine. Arrests of women are
Anatoly Petrykin. Anti-bribery in Russia 07.06.2013
The document discusses combating corruption in Russia through national legislation and enforcement efforts. It outlines some of the key players in anti-corruption efforts in Russia and abroad. Statistics are presented showing perceptions of corruption in Russia and attitudes within business. The main types of fraud and corruption risks according to surveys are outlined. An overview is then provided of Russia's anti-corruption laws, including prohibitions on bribery, receiving bribes, and intermediating bribes. Recent amendments strengthening anti-corruption legislation are also noted.
Memorandum to maharashtra government about shakti bill
The document is a letter objecting to the proposed Maharashtra Shakti Bill, 2020 and the accompanying Special Courts and Machinery for the Implementation of the Shakti Bill, 2020. It raises several concerns about provisions in the bills, including that the presumption of consent negates the offense of rape, the death penalty will reduce conviction rates and deter reporting, and the short investigation and trial timeframes will compromise justice. It requests that the bills not be tabled without further consultation with women's rights experts and stakeholders.
Moj falsifying documents
Freedom of Information request revealing the Ministry of Justice's involvement in criminally falsifying documents with Humberside Police as an accomplice deleted by WhatDoTheyKnow
Gujrat HC on custodial torture.pdf
1. The court ordered an inquiry into the arrest of four petitioners by police authorities in Gujarat, as the court believes this was a case of extreme excess and the petitioners appear to be victims due to their birth in a particular community.
2. While independent witnesses said the petitioners earned an honest living, police implicated them in around 5 cases based only on their confessions obtained through torture. The petitioners were acquitted in all cases by trial courts.
3. The court ordered the Inspector General of Police to conduct an inquiry and submit an affidavit regarding any excess committed by police in arresting and implicating the petitioners. The court will then decide on action against police officers and compensation for the petition
Henry tiphagne v state
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition to quash an FIR registered against him for conducting a peaceful protest against the CAA and NRC amendments. While the court acknowledged that there were grounds to register the FIR for public nuisance and traffic interference, it ruled that continuing the prosecution was not warranted since no violence or untoward incidents occurred. Noting that peaceful protests had been seen across India against the amendments, the court quashed the FIR and allowed the petition, with the benefit also applying to other non-petitioning accused in the case.
Tribunal 10 december-2014 hearing decision notice and statement of reasons SC...
SSCSC first tier tribunal decision notice and statement of reasons. HMCTS Manchester Bridge street hearing centre SC946/12/09407 Judge Neary
Exhibit a 6
Supporting document (Exhibit A-6) to Appellant’s notice of appeal against a Decision Notice issued by the Information Commissioner, in accordance with rule 22 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009. Concerns requests for information made to Humberside police to obtain the number of times the phrase "YOU CANT MAKE ME" appeared in police officers witness statements. Humberside Police relied on section 14(1) (vexatious requests) of FOIA.
Lgo premature final decision 18 011 180
LGO final decision 18 011 180. North East Lincolnshire Council claims to have video footage which it has relied on to support what it claims has been captured relating to an allegation that its contractor left a demand for money that is not owed somewhere accessible to persons other than the intended recipient (a personal data breach). The taxpayer affected asked to see the video evidence but the Council refused and stated that it would not be taking any further action or entering into any further correspondence regarding the matter. The Local Government Ombudsman took the Council's side and refused to investigate but proceeded to the final decision before the complainant had chance to actually comment on the draft. The Ombudsman states in paragraph 3 of the 21 November 2018 final decision that the complainant's comments on the draft had been considered even though complainant's comments had not been submitted until 26 November 2018. This all follows North East Lincolnshire Council fraudulently obtaining a Council Tax liability order by committing perjury (lying in a witness statement to the court). There was no monies owed but the Council criminally engineered a non-payment scenario. The Police, Local Government Ombudsman and Court were all complicit because they looked the other way. Bailiff firms Rossendales and subsequently Jacobs have been instructed in the Councils attempts to defraud the complainant with their enforcement fees. Events stem from High Court appeal and claim made by Justices' clerk for Humber and South Yorkshire that 10 items of post (appeal correspondence) had been sent to the Appellant between 19 December 2013 and 13 December 2016 which the Appellant claims never to have received, and believes they were dishonestly constructed later (to cover their tracks) to satisfy enquiries made by the judicial ombudsman (JACO) and an investigation carried out by HM Courts and Tribunal Service.
More Related Content
What's hot
Exhibit a 4
Supporting document (Exhibit A-4) to Appellant’s notice of appeal against a Decision Notice issued by the Information Commissioner, in accordance with rule 22 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009. Concerns requests for information made to Humberside police to obtain the number of times the phrase "YOU CANT MAKE ME" appeared in police officers witness statements. Humberside Police relied on section 14(1) (vexatious requests) of FOIA.
Iopc response letter before action 24 oct 19
IOPC’s 24 October response to Letter Before Action (26 September 2019) in the matter of a proposed application for judicial review of the Independent Office for Police Conduct decisions (refs: 2017/082079 and 2019/115969) in relation to appeals against Humberside Police complaint investigation outcome letters of 12 September 2018 and 7 March 2019 (refs: CO/432/15 and CO/632/18) which were dealt with unlawfully in just about every way imaginable. The initial matter (CO/432/15) concerns a police conduct complaint submitted 8 November 2015 which was initially dealt with by way of Local Resolution. The outcome (which was appealed and referred to the IOPC) was provided on 3 April 2017. On completing the review, the IOPC deemed the statutory conditions were not met for the matter to be suitable for local resolution and directed the force to fully investigate the complaint, taking into consideration further information such as evidence in support of alleged collusion between the police, CPS and Courts. Humberside Police ignored the IOPC and dealt with the complaint omitting to consider the further information and evidence and the IOPC was satisfied with how the complaint was investigated. The following matter (CO/632/18) concerns a police conduct complaint submitted inadvertently on 10 October 2018 which was deemed appropriate to be proportionately investigated. The force had – so it claimed – sent the complaint investigation outcome letter concerning CO/432/15 to the wrong address thereby failing to provide sufficient safeguard against unauthorised access, loss or damage to someone’s personal data. The letter contained details of the criminal record of the person whose data protection rights were infringed upon and the reason for his arrest. The data breach (if the letter had in fact been sent) was more severe/unfair due to the disclosed details of the criminal record relating to a wrongful conviction contributed by witnesses committing perjury (the arresting officer is suspected to have incited them). The correspondence to the police on 10 October was not intended as a formal complaint but was handled as one by the force in accordance with the complaint’s procedure under the police reform Act. The communication was predominantly to alert the force of its obligations to refer the personal data breach to the Information Commissioner and to obtain some preliminary information in anticipation of submitting a complaint (to the force) in case it was a prerequisite to raising the issue with the Commissioner. The queries were never answered and the Investigating Officer just ploughed on with the process regardless ignoring the complainant. Consequently the complainant was unable to feed into the process in respect of the information he was denied throughout the course of the investigation because it was not until it was too late when the investigation had completed that the questions he had asked were answered. The Investigation outcome revealed that....
Perjury to commit fraud 2 dec 15
Statement reporting North East Lincolnshire Council for committing perjury with intent to defraud the defendant for a hearing at Grimsby Magistrates' court in which the judge was complicit.
Letter before action 26 sept 2019 r
This letter before claim concerns a proposed application for judicial review of a decision by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) not to review findings of a police investigation. The letter provides background on the claimant's criminal case where he believes false witness statements and police misconduct occurred. It details the claimant's police complaints process regarding the witness statements and arresting officer. The letter argues the IOPC should intervene as the police complaints process was mishandled and statutory obligations were breached. The claimant seeks to challenge the IOPC's decision not to review the police investigation findings.
Sra complaint 28 november 2018 r
1. The document outlines a report made to the Solicitors Regulation Authority regarding concerns with Sally Laycock, a solicitor at Humberside Police.
2. The report alleges that Laycock improperly dealt with appeals of complaints made to Humberside Police regarding criminal allegations against a court. Laycock allegedly distorted facts and did not properly address the concerns raised.
3. The handling of the complaints by Humberside Police and appeals by Laycock involved obstruction tactics that prevented the concerns from being properly investigated according to the report. This caused significant hardship for the complainant.
Negligence obfuscation - delaying tactics etc
Evidence of Humberside Police's continued and deliberate use of obfuscation tactics to ensure that serious criminal misconduct of senior officers serving with Humberside Police, raised in July 2017, have been successfully covered up and never investigated. (Complaint refs: CO/400/18 – CO/49/18 – CO/498/17 – CO/886/17 – CO/535/17).
Exhibit a 3
Supporting document (Exhibit A-3) to Appellant’s notice of appeal against a Decision Notice issued by the Information Commissioner, in accordance with rule 22 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009. Concerns requests for information made to Humberside police to obtain the number of times the phrase "YOU CANT MAKE ME" appeared in police officers witness statements. Humberside Police relied on section 14(1) (vexatious requests) of FOIA.
Rollits Employment Law Update
Legal newsletter on Employment Law featuring articles on Fees update, Sexual harassment claims, Mental health in the workplace and the Gig economy
Discontinue 12 june 19 co498-17
Discontinuance request submitted by the Professional Standards Department to the Humberside Police Appeals Body (HPAB). Evidence of Humberside Police's continued and deliberate use of obfuscation tactics to ensure that serious criminal misconduct of senior officers serving with Humberside Police, raised in July 2017, have been successfully covered up and never investigated. (Complaint refs: CO/400/18 – CO/49/18 – CO/498/17 – CO/886/17 – CO/535/17).
Saathik ali v state
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition in the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court to quash an FIR registered against him and others for conducting a peaceful demonstration against the CAA and NRC amendments. While there was prima facie evidence for an FIR, the court noted that no untoward incidents occurred during the peaceful protest. Since continued prosecution was not warranted given the lack of violence, the court quashed the FIR to secure the ends of justice, with the benefit also applying to the non-petitioning accused mentioned in the FIR.
Exhibit a 5
Supporting document (Exhibit A-5) to Appellant’s notice of appeal against a Decision Notice issued by the Information Commissioner, in accordance with rule 22 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009. Concerns requests for information made to Humberside police to obtain the number of times the phrase "YOU CANT MAKE ME" appeared in police officers witness statements. Humberside Police relied on section 14(1) (vexatious requests) of FOIA.
Madras hc apr 1 order uidai
The court document discusses a case regarding a political party in Puducherry that allegedly conducted an unauthorized campaign by sending bulk SMS messages to citizens' phones linked to their Aadhar cards without permission from the Election Commission. The court notes serious privacy concerns and orders the Election Commission and UIDAI to investigate how the political party accessed personal citizen information. The court will hear the case again in 6 weeks to receive answers from the respondent authorities regarding compliance with election rules and protection of citizen privacy.
March 26 order
The court document discusses a case regarding a political party allegedly obtaining and using personal voter details without permission for campaigning in violation of conduct codes. The court notes the election authority has not fully investigated how the data was leaked. It directs the authority to immediately determine how the political party accessed the information and take appropriate action. The court also notes the election commission has not received a letter from the party seeking permission to send bulk messages and hopes the investigation will be completed quickly followed by proper steps. The matter is scheduled for another hearing on March 31.
IPC sections | Indian Sarais Act 1887
This document outlines several sections from Indian penal codes describing various criminal offenses and associated punishments. Some key points include:
- Workers in dangerous industries like explosives or chemicals who are injured may receive compensation from their employer of 200-1000 rupees and 6 months imprisonment.
- Kidnapping, forcing someone into begging, or attacking a woman's modesty are punishable by up to lifetime imprisonment or 1 year imprisonment and fines.
- Forgery, reckless driving causing injury, tax violations, and stalking carry potential imprisonment from 1-7 years and fines.
- Public intoxication, nuisance, or misconduct can result in 24 hours imprisonment or 1000 rupee fine. Arrests of women are
Anatoly Petrykin. Anti-bribery in Russia 07.06.2013
The document discusses combating corruption in Russia through national legislation and enforcement efforts. It outlines some of the key players in anti-corruption efforts in Russia and abroad. Statistics are presented showing perceptions of corruption in Russia and attitudes within business. The main types of fraud and corruption risks according to surveys are outlined. An overview is then provided of Russia's anti-corruption laws, including prohibitions on bribery, receiving bribes, and intermediating bribes. Recent amendments strengthening anti-corruption legislation are also noted.
Memorandum to maharashtra government about shakti bill
The document is a letter objecting to the proposed Maharashtra Shakti Bill, 2020 and the accompanying Special Courts and Machinery for the Implementation of the Shakti Bill, 2020. It raises several concerns about provisions in the bills, including that the presumption of consent negates the offense of rape, the death penalty will reduce conviction rates and deter reporting, and the short investigation and trial timeframes will compromise justice. It requests that the bills not be tabled without further consultation with women's rights experts and stakeholders.
Moj falsifying documents
Freedom of Information request revealing the Ministry of Justice's involvement in criminally falsifying documents with Humberside Police as an accomplice deleted by WhatDoTheyKnow
Gujrat HC on custodial torture.pdf
1. The court ordered an inquiry into the arrest of four petitioners by police authorities in Gujarat, as the court believes this was a case of extreme excess and the petitioners appear to be victims due to their birth in a particular community.
2. While independent witnesses said the petitioners earned an honest living, police implicated them in around 5 cases based only on their confessions obtained through torture. The petitioners were acquitted in all cases by trial courts.
3. The court ordered the Inspector General of Police to conduct an inquiry and submit an affidavit regarding any excess committed by police in arresting and implicating the petitioners. The court will then decide on action against police officers and compensation for the petition
Henry tiphagne v state
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition to quash an FIR registered against him for conducting a peaceful protest against the CAA and NRC amendments. While the court acknowledged that there were grounds to register the FIR for public nuisance and traffic interference, it ruled that continuing the prosecution was not warranted since no violence or untoward incidents occurred. Noting that peaceful protests had been seen across India against the amendments, the court quashed the FIR and allowed the petition, with the benefit also applying to other non-petitioning accused in the case.
Tribunal 10 december-2014 hearing decision notice and statement of reasons SC...
SSCSC first tier tribunal decision notice and statement of reasons. HMCTS Manchester Bridge street hearing centre SC946/12/09407 Judge Neary
What's hot (20)
Anatoly Petrykin. Anti-bribery in Russia 07.06.2013
Anatoly Petrykin. Anti-bribery in Russia 07.06.2013
Memorandum to maharashtra government about shakti bill
Memorandum to maharashtra government about shakti bill
Tribunal 10 december-2014 hearing decision notice and statement of reasons SC...
Tribunal 10 december-2014 hearing decision notice and statement of reasons SC...
Similar to Monitoring officer 22 jan 2021 r
Exhibit a 6
Supporting document (Exhibit A-6) to Appellant’s notice of appeal against a Decision Notice issued by the Information Commissioner, in accordance with rule 22 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009. Concerns requests for information made to Humberside police to obtain the number of times the phrase "YOU CANT MAKE ME" appeared in police officers witness statements. Humberside Police relied on section 14(1) (vexatious requests) of FOIA.
Lgo premature final decision 18 011 180
LGO final decision 18 011 180. North East Lincolnshire Council claims to have video footage which it has relied on to support what it claims has been captured relating to an allegation that its contractor left a demand for money that is not owed somewhere accessible to persons other than the intended recipient (a personal data breach). The taxpayer affected asked to see the video evidence but the Council refused and stated that it would not be taking any further action or entering into any further correspondence regarding the matter. The Local Government Ombudsman took the Council's side and refused to investigate but proceeded to the final decision before the complainant had chance to actually comment on the draft. The Ombudsman states in paragraph 3 of the 21 November 2018 final decision that the complainant's comments on the draft had been considered even though complainant's comments had not been submitted until 26 November 2018. This all follows North East Lincolnshire Council fraudulently obtaining a Council Tax liability order by committing perjury (lying in a witness statement to the court). There was no monies owed but the Council criminally engineered a non-payment scenario. The Police, Local Government Ombudsman and Court were all complicit because they looked the other way. Bailiff firms Rossendales and subsequently Jacobs have been instructed in the Councils attempts to defraud the complainant with their enforcement fees. Events stem from High Court appeal and claim made by Justices' clerk for Humber and South Yorkshire that 10 items of post (appeal correspondence) had been sent to the Appellant between 19 December 2013 and 13 December 2016 which the Appellant claims never to have received, and believes they were dishonestly constructed later (to cover their tracks) to satisfy enquiries made by the judicial ombudsman (JACO) and an investigation carried out by HM Courts and Tribunal Service.
Malfeasance and fraud - moj
Humberside Chief Constable turning blind eye to police failing to investigate criminal allegations of malfeasance and fraud involving a false claim made by Justices' clerk for Humber and South Yorkshire that 10 items of post had been sent to the complainant between 19 December 2013 and 13 December 2016 which the complainant claims never to have received, and believes they were dishonestly constructed later (to cover their tracks) to satisfy enquiries made by the judicial ombudsman (JACO). The complainant considers these matters should be investigated by Humberside Police as a Crime (Local Resolution complaint CO 535/17)
Associated docs crime report 15 feb 19
I wish to report criminal and dishonest conduct regarding the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman (JACO), Paul Kernaghan, and a number of officers holding various positions acting on behalf of the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGSCO). I have evidence accumulated over a several year period relating to these officer’s which proves beyond reasonable doubt that their actions have routinely amounted to a betrayal of trust and violation of the laws which impose a duty on officers in their positions to act impartially, fairly and without discrimination or bias.
Statement by hon dr ernest hilaire slp press conference-september 3 2020
Dr. Hilaire accuses Prime Minister Chastanet of using state resources to carry out a politically motivated persecution against him through baseless allegations. He maintains he committed no wrongdoing in the purchase and importation of vehicles. Dr. Hilaire challenges the Prime Minister to take legal action if he truly believes the law was broken, and questions where is the rule of law in several scandals involving the Prime Minister's administration.
Bcit bcgeu
1) The document summarizes the author's experience attempting to blow the whistle on corruption at BCIT and ICBC, and the retaliation he faced as a result.
2) After filing lawsuits against ICBC, the author was deemed a "vexatious litigant" by a chief justice. He then attempted to inform his coworkers at BCIT and was restricted from doing so and eventually fired.
3) His union representative failed to properly investigate his grievance against BCIT and dismissed the case without contacting all relevant parties. An appeal was also dismissed.
Bcgeu scam
1. The document summarizes Ron Korkut's experience as a whistleblower who attempted to expose corruption and was punished by his employer and union for doing so.
2. After being in a hit and run accident, he tried to sue ICBC and bring them to justice for insuring criminally negligent drivers. He was declared a vexatious litigant by a chief justice and denied access to legal services.
3. He was then fired from his job at BCIT for informing coworkers about corruption in the courts. Despite paying union dues, his union mishandled his grievance and refused to properly investigate his claims.
Judicial complaint dismissal and further info agreed
This letter from the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office acknowledges a complaint filed by Mr. Gardiner about the conduct of District Judge Asplin during a hearing on October 21, 2014. The letter dismisses part of the complaint, relating to the judge's decision, as the office cannot investigate judicial decisions. For the remaining part of the complaint alleging the judge insulted the complainant's intelligence, more information is requested by January 21st to further investigate, or else that part of the complaint may also be dismissed.
Abdul Hakim Shabazz Deposition Hearing in Federal Court
This is Abdul Hakim Shabazz deposition hearing in the Marion County Fairground Boards, money misappropriating scandal.
Delhi hc feb 5 safai karmcharis order
1) The East Delhi Municipal Corporation filed a writ petition seeking directions from respondent authorities to ensure its officials and employees can perform their duties without obstruction and that day-to-day operations run smoothly.
2) Due to non-payment of salaries during the COVID-19 pandemic, municipal sanitation workers were on strike and protesting, leaving garbage piled up in the streets.
3) The court directed the police commissioner to take steps to maintain law and order, prevent unlawful conduct, and ensure garbage is removed as per an earlier court order to prevent health issues. It also directed sanitation workers and their unions not to break the law and obstruct work.
Outcome 17 april 2019
Bogus investigation outcome of 17 April 2019 littered with what are effectively red herrings for the benefit of the uninformed observer who would be ignorant of how compelling the evidence really was (which has been omitted from the outcome). The reality however, is that to anyone informed it would be so overwhelmingly obvious that the content is not worth the paper it is written on – a shameful example of the establishment covering for their own.
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
This document provides information about civil law cases in the UK legal system. It defines civil cases as disputes where an individual or business believes their rights have been infringed. It describes different types of civil claims like contract disputes, negligence cases, and trespass. It explains the typical process for civil cases, including negotiation, consulting a solicitor, and taking a case to court. It discusses the county court and high court systems for hearing civil cases, and outlines the small claims, fast, and multi-track processes for allocating cases based on value and complexity.
Municipal court criminal law practice
Kenneth Vercammen is an Edison, Middlesex County, NJ trial attorney where he handles Criminal, Municipal Court, Probate, Civil Litigation and Estate Administration matters. Ken is author of the American Bar Association's new book “Criminal Law Forms” and often lectures to trial lawyers of the American Bar Association, NJ State Bar Association and Middlesex County Bar Association. As the Past Chair of the Municipal Court Section he has served on its board for 10 years.
Awarded the Municipal Court Attorney of the Year by both the NJSBA and Middlesex County Bar Association, he also received the NJSBA- YLD Service to the Bar Award and the General Practitioner Attorney of the Year, now Solo Attorney of the Year.
Ken Vercammen is a highly regarded lecturer on both Municipal Court/ DWI and Estate/ Probate Law issues for the NJICLE- New Jersey State Bar Association, American Bar Association, and Middlesex County Bar Association. His articles have been published by NJ Law Journal, ABA Law Practice Management Magazine, YLD Dictum, GP Gazette and New Jersey Lawyer magazine. He was a speaker at the 2013 ABA Annual meeting program “Handling the Criminal Misdemeanor and Traffic Case” and serves as is the Editor in Chief of the NJ Municipal Court Law Review.
For nine years he served as the Cranbury Township Prosecutor and also was a Special Acting Prosecutor in nine different towns. Ken has successfully handled over one thousand Municipal Court and Superior Court matters in the past 27 years.
His private practice has devoted a substantial portion of professional time to the preparation and trial of litigated matters. Appearing in Courts throughout New Jersey several times each week on Criminal and Municipal Court trials, civil and contested Probate hearings. Ken also serves as the Editor of the popular legal website and mobile phone app www.njlaws.com and related blogs. In Law School he was a member of the Law Review, winner of the ATLA trial competition and top ten in class.
Throughout his career he has served the NJSBA in many leadership and volunteer positions. Ken has testified for the NJSBA before the Senate Judiciary Committee to support changes in the DWI law to permit restricted use driver license and interlock legislation. Ken also testified before the Assembly Judiciary Committee in favor of the first-time criminal offender “Conditional Dismissal” legislation which permits dismissal of some criminal charges. He is the voice of the Solo and Small firm attorneys who juggle active court practice with bar and community activities. Recently, the ABA Solo Division has selected Ken to write its new book on “Marketing for the New and Small Firm Attorney”. In his private life he has been a member of the NJ State champion Raritan Valley Road Runners master’s team and is a 4th degree black belt.
Jaco 23 may 2016 provisional report
Provisional Investigation Report of the Conduct Ombudsman (JACO) in relation to the mishandling of a complaint by the Humber Advisory Committee. The papers are littered with factual errors even before considering the criminal handling of the cover-up. Even before refusing to accept the complaint for a full investigation the Ombudsman knew that there was at least one other letter additional to the 3 letters referred to in the refusal letter that the MoJ produced after the event to cover their tracks (on further investigation by HMCTS it was eventually discovered that there were 10 in total). Note that the Secretary to the Humber Advisory Committee – to whom the complaint was addressed, was also the Justices’ Clerk for Humber & South Yorkshire against whom the complaint was made and who the Conduct Ombudsman dealt with in his investigations. In summary, the matter ultimately concerned malfeasance and fraud involving a false claim made by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) that 10 items of post had been sent to the complainant between 19 December 2013 and 13 December 2016 which the complainant claims never to have received, and believes they were dishonestly constructed later (to cover their tracks) to satisfy enquiries made by the judicial ombudsman (JACO) and an investigation carried out by HMCTS complaints team.
09-18-15 BANKRUPTCY HEARING TRANSCRIBED (Townsend Matter - Photos Added)
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
This is the TRANSCRIPT from the September 18, 2015 Bankruptcy Court Hearing in the United States Federal Bankruptcy Court - Southern District Mississippi (Jackson). The Photographs/Pictures have been added for EMPHASIS and BETTER UNDERSTANDING!
SMLLC v Geraldine Redmond US BK CT Transcript - Case No. NDO3-12487 - 4-20-05
The court denied a motion to amend a complaint objecting to the discharge of debt in a bankruptcy case. The original complaint alleged the debtor failed to disclose assets like a corral and horses in bankruptcy filings. The proposed amendment alleged rental property fraud. The court found the proposed amendment did not relate back to the original complaint under Rule 15(c), as the facts alleged were different. A two-day trial was scheduled for May 31st and June 1st to resolve the original complaint.
Judicial complaint dismissal
This letter from the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office dismisses a complaint made about a district judge. It summarizes the additional information provided about the complaint and explains that most of the complaint relates to judicial decisions and case management, which cannot be investigated. It dismisses these parts of the complaint. The letter also explains that two other parts of the complaint do not meet the threshold for misconduct. It provides information on appealing decisions and contacting the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman with any complaints about how the complaint was handled.
Abuse of Psychiatry in the UK Legal System
This document summarizes the abuse of psychiatry in the UK legal system as observed by Leonard Lawrence. It describes how Lawrence was medicated to the point of losing mental capacity and deprived of access to the Court of Protection for 18 months. During this time, considerable amounts of his assets went missing. The document alleges failures by the Official Solicitor and others to properly protect Lawrence and involve the Court of Protection, resulting in over £100,000 in legal fees being generated against him when he lacked capacity. It calls for reform including unique identifiers on medical documents to establish proper oversight of cases where individuals are deemed to lack capacity.
Similar to Monitoring officer 22 jan 2021 r (18)
Statement by hon dr ernest hilaire slp press conference-september 3 2020
Statement by hon dr ernest hilaire slp press conference-september 3 2020
Judicial complaint dismissal and further info agreed
Judicial complaint dismissal and further info agreed
Abdul Hakim Shabazz Deposition Hearing in Federal Court
Abdul Hakim Shabazz Deposition Hearing in Federal Court
09-18-15 BANKRUPTCY HEARING TRANSCRIBED (Townsend Matter - Photos Added)
09-18-15 BANKRUPTCY HEARING TRANSCRIBED (Townsend Matter - Photos Added)
SMLLC v Geraldine Redmond US BK CT Transcript - Case No. NDO3-12487 - 4-20-05
SMLLC v Geraldine Redmond US BK CT Transcript - Case No. NDO3-12487 - 4-20-05
More from Evidence_Complicit
Moj criticised over forging documents
Freedom of Information request revealing the Ministry of Justice's involvement in criminally falsifying documents with Humberside Police as an accomplice made unsearchable by WhatDoTheyKnow
Exhibit 7
This document is a prosecution application from Grimsby and Cleethorpes Magistrates' Court against Humberside Police. It is dated April 26, 2016 and relates to starting a prosecution under section 1 of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980. The court document is labeled as Exhibit 7 in the case.
Police complaint 17 april 2020 - r
Allegations that the officer has pursued a deliberate course of action to affect the course of justice; by intentionally frustrating a police investigation into serious crime to enable potential defendants to evade arrest or commit further offences. The 17 April 2019 investigation outcome along with correspondence entered into in the matter between 2 February and 30 March 2019 supports incontrovertibly that the investigation was staged to effect a cover up of serious criminal wrongdoing to vindicate the accused. An account briefly summarising each aspect of the alleged conduct relating only to allegation (1) as referred to in the investigation outcome letter of 17 April 2019 is provided in the annex to this form. Further details relating to allegations (2) an (3) may be provided as and when required. A complaint is suitable for local resolution if the appropriate authority is satisfied that the conduct being complained about, even if proven, would not justify criminal or disciplinary proceedings against the person being complained about. The conduct being complained about in this complaint would without any question if proven justify criminal and disciplinary proceedings against the person being complained about so this complaint is clearly not suitable for local resolution. It is not a repetitive complaint because I have never made a complaint about the named officer perverting the course of justice or a complaint of any sort for that matter.
Discontinuance request
Freedom of Information request revealing Evidence of Humberside Police's continued and deliberate use of obfuscation tactics to ensure that serious criminal misconduct of senior officers serving with Humberside Police, raised in July 2017, have been successfully covered up and never investigated. (Complaint refs: CO/400/18 – CO/49/18 – CO/498/17 – CO/886/17 – CO/535/17). Deleted by WhatDoTheyKnow
Inf tribunal ea20170161 (you cant make me)
Freedom of Information request revealing collusion between the Information Commissioner and Humberside police deleted by WhatDoTheyKnow
Extract unlawful arrest
Extract from an appeal to the Independent Office for police Conduct (IOPC) against the decision of Humberside Police in respect of a complaint (ref: CO/432/15). This matter concerns a police conduct complaint submitted 8 November 2015 which was initially dealt with by way of Local Resolution. The outcome (which was appealed and referred to the IOPC) was provided on 3 April 2017. On completing the review, the IOPC deemed the statutory conditions were not met for the matter to be suitable for local resolution and directed the force to fully investigate the complaint, taking into consideration further information such as evidence in support of alleged collusion between the police, CPS and Courts. Humberside Police ignored the IOPC and dealt with the complaint omitting to consider the further information and evidence and the IOPC was satisfied with how the complaint was investigated
Co 498 17 appeal outcome r
Humberside Police Appeals Body outcome (4 April, 2019) to appeal against the decision of Humberside Police's Professional Standards department (PSD) in respect of a complaint (ref: CO/498/17). This matter concerns a police conduct complaint submitted 14 July 2017 raising issues about the PSD and an Investigating Officer who had not bothered to open a previous conduct complaint file until 370 days after it had been allocated to him. The present matter required by law to be referred to the Independent Office of Police Conduct (IOPC). However, the force wrongly categorised the complaint effectively downplaying the seriousness of it, thus enabling it to be dealt with by way of Local Resolution (not fully investigated). Further mishandling followed, presumably as a deliberate tactic to delay and obfuscate the process due to the seriousness of the allegations. As a consequence it has been referred back twice to the PSD to be dealt with appropriately and has so far (17 March 2020) been ongoing 977 days
Lgo response to judicial review pre action
Local Government Ombudsman's (LGO) letter of response pursuant to the requirements of the Judicial Review Pre-Action Protocol (Letter Before Action, 4 Sept 2017) in the matter of a proposed application for judicial review of the Local Government Ombudsman's decision No 17 003 081. Concerns a complaint about North East Lincs Council regarding the authority's unlawful application to Grimsby Magistrates' Court for a Council Tax liability order.
Letter before action 4 sept 2017 redact
Letter Before Action (4 Sept 2017) in the matter of a proposed application for judicial review of the Local Government Ombudsman's decision No 17 003 081. Concerns a complaint about North East Lincs Council regarding the authority's unlawful application to Grimsby Magistrates' Court for a Council Tax liability order.
Scaiff 191215005-foi-response-corrected date
Ministry of Justice's 14 January 2020 response to Freedom of Information request originally submitted 7 September 2019, though due to obstruction by whatdotheyknow and obfuscation tack-ticks by MoJ (changing reference numbers etc) the effective submission date deemed by the MoJ was 15 December 2019. Eventual reference number: 191215005, original 190907001 and other previously quoted numbers 191020004 and 191125041. Concerns late production and backdating of documents designed to ‘plug gaps’ and corruption of documents by conflation, amendment or post-dated creation.
Outcome letter co 632 18
Humberside Police outcome letter of 7 March 2019 (ref: CO/632/18) which was dealt with unlawfully in just about every way imaginable. This matter concerns a police conduct complaint submitted inadvertently on 10 October 2018 which was deemed appropriate to be proportionately investigated. The force had – so it claimed – sent a letter to the wrong address thereby failing to provide sufficient safeguard against unauthorised access, loss or damage to someone’s personal data. The letter contained details of the criminal record of the person whose data protection rights were infringed upon and the reason for his arrest. The data breach (if the letter had in fact been sent) was more severe/unfair due to the disclosed details of the criminal record relating to a wrongful conviction contributed by witnesses committing perjury (the arresting officer is suspected to have incited them). The correspondence to the police on 10 October was not intended as a formal complaint but was handled as one by the force in accordance with the complaint’s procedure under the police reform Act. The communication was predominantly to alert the force of its obligations to refer the personal data breach to the Information Commissioner and to obtain some preliminary information in anticipation of submitting a complaint (to the force) in case it was a prerequisite to raising the issue with the Commissioner. The queries were never answered and the Investigating Officer just ploughed on with the process regardless ignoring the complainant. Consequently the complainant was unable to feed into the process in respect of the information he was denied throughout the course of the investigation because it was not until it was too late when the investigation had completed that the questions he had asked were answered. The Investigation outcome revealed that ‘the matter was referred to the Information Commissioners Office as a data security breach’ and the believed recipient of the letter stated that she did not receive it. The complainant's case was severely prejudiced in respect of both the police conduct complaint and that of the Information Commissioner. The force's unlawful and deliberate mishandling of the complaint ensured that the Commissioner’s conclusions were based on hopelessly inadequate information as well as its own investigation failing to reach a conclusive outcome. The Investigating Officer clearly failed to carry out her investigation in line with the vast majority of the rules and standards for how the police should investigate complaints. All the anomalies were identified in the appeal to the IOPC and appropriately cited (the rules and standards) for every occurrence, yet the Casework Manager deliberately handled the appeal unlawfully knowing that if the complainant was misguided enough to take the matter to the high court he would simply be asking to be fleeced in the casino justice system which always falls on the side of the crooked public body.
Complicit in cover up 10 dec 19
Allegations against various public bodies for complicity in covering up misconduct in public office including Humberside Police, Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), Judicial office holders, North East Lincolnshire Council (NELC), Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman (JACO), Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)
More from Evidence_Complicit (12)
Recently uploaded
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...Syed Muhammad Humza Hussain
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
Training aid for law enforcement officers related to search warrants, the requirements needed, drafting, and execution of the search warrant.
Incometax Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Pim Betist's presentation about generative AI in the legal sector at Lexpo.com '24
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
slide deck : Patenting innovations in 3D printing
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
Lincoln硕士毕业证成绩单【微信95270640】办理新西兰林肯大学毕业证原版一模一样、Lincoln毕业证制作【Q微信95270640】《新西兰林肯大学毕业证购买流程》《Lincoln成绩单制作》新西兰林肯大学毕业证书Lincoln毕业证文凭新西兰林肯大学
本科毕业证书,学历学位认证如何办理【留学国外学位学历认证、毕业证、成绩单、大学Offer、雅思托福代考、语言证书、学生卡、高仿教育部认证等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务】代办国外（海外）英国、加拿大、美国、新西兰、澳大利亚、新西兰等国外各大学毕业证、文凭学历证书、成绩单、学历学位认证真实可查。
[留学文凭学历认证(留信认证使馆认证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单毕业证证书大学Offer请假条成绩单语言证书国际回国人员证明高仿教育部认证申请学校等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务。
多年留学服务公司,拥有海外样板无数能完美1:1还原海外各国大学degreeDiplomaTranscripts等毕业材料。海外大学毕业材料都有哪些工艺呢？工艺难度主要由：烫金.钢印.底纹.水印.防伪光标.热敏防伪等等组成。而且我们每天都在更新海外文凭的样板以求所有同学都能享受到完美的品质服务。
国外毕业证学位证成绩单办理方法：
1客户提供办理新西兰林肯大学新西兰林肯大学毕业证学位证信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）
— — — — 我们是挂科和未毕业同学们的福音我们是实体公司精益求精的工艺！ — — — -
一真实留信认证的作用(私企外企荣誉的见证):
1：该专业认证可证明留学生真实留学身份同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。
2：国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方。
3：凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后同步读取人才网入库信息。
4：个人职称评审加20分个人信誉贷款加10分。
5：在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。问山娃想买什么想吃什么山娃知道父亲赚钱很辛苦除了书籍和文具山娃啥也不要能牵着父亲的手满城闲逛他已心满意足了父亲连挑了三套童装叫山娃试穿山娃有点不想父亲说城里不比乡下要穿得漂漂亮亮爸怎么不穿得漂亮望着父亲山娃反问道父亲听了并不回答只是吃吃地笑山娃很精神越逛越起劲父亲却越逛越疲倦望着父亲呵欠连天的样子山娃也说困了累了回家吧小屋闷罐一般头顶上的三叶扇彻夜呜呜作响搅得满屋热气腾腾也搅得山娃心烦意乱父亲一的
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
असंगत न्यायालयी फैसलों के कारण भारत में महिलाओं को सुरक्षित गर्भपात के लिए एक भ्रामक और अनुचित कानूनी लड़ाई का सामना करना पड़ रहा है।
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
USDA grants bolster rural communities, driving growth, sustainability, and prosperity through strategic development initiatives and financial support.
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Learn more on how to obtain the work permit for self-employed persons in Italy at https://immigration-italy.com/selfemployment-work-permit-in-italy/.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Recently uploaded (20)
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
Monitoring officer 22 jan 2021 r
- 1. NORT~ EAS~ LINCOLNSHIRE COUNCIL www.nelincs.gov.uk Grimsby North East Lincolnshire 003" rv..,. I Our ref: SDJ/EF 22nd January 2021 Dear Mr r:II:_U I have reviewed your letter of 26th November 2020. I note that this matter has been exhaustively dealt with through the internal complaints procedure and in accordance with Council policy. Further, you make reference to referrals to the Ombudsman and extraneous correspondence to other officers (Chief Executive/Head of Internal Audit etc) and formal proceedings. Our Feedback policy is clear. At 12.3 of such policy: "Once an Ombudsman investigation has commenced, North East Lincolnshire Council willcceaseall infernaLinvestigations. Any final decision served by the Ombudsman cannot be investigated by the Council and is the final arbitration of the issues raised." You now seek to raise spurious allegations of criminal conduct by my deputy, a solicitor of the highest integrity, but produce no evidence other than routine correspondence. This correspondence is from seven years ago. I do not give those allegations any credence. If you feel that you have sufficient grounds, then you should refer the matter to Humberside Police. I will be taking no further action. Your issue stems from the Council securing a liability order. The Council has acted appropriately and proportionately. If you have a grievance around the issue of a liability order then you should challenge this through the courts, as the appropriate forum. Simon D. Jones, Assistant Director Law, Governance and Assets (Monitoring Officer) - North East Lincolnshire Council, Municipal Offices, Town Hall Square, Grimsby, North East Lincolnshire, ON31 1HU Telephone (01472) 324004 Fax (01472) 324022, OX 13536, Grimsby 1 Email: simon.jones1@nelincs.gov.uk
- 2. NORT~ EAS~ LINCOLNSHIRE COUNCIL www.nelincs.gov.uk However, I feel that with the passage of time you may have insurmountable hurdles to overcome in that regard. That is a matter for you. You may wish to take independent legal advice on that point. Nevertheless, the Council has acted appropriately. You have raised issues with various bodies independent of the Council. I do not accept your allegations of complicit "cover ups" and "smoke screens". In my view, this form of allegation is manifest of an unsubstantiated grievance, reinforced by the apparent refusal of those bodies to take any further action. Yours faithfully, 5 D Jones Assistant Director Law, Governance and Assets (Monitoring Officer) Simon D. Jones, Assistant Director Law, Governance and Assets (Monitoring Officer) '" North East Lincolnshire Council, Municipal Offices, Town Hall Square, Grimsby, North East Lincolnshire, DN31 1HU Telephone (01472) 324004 Fax (01472) 324022, DX 13536, Grimsby 1 Email: simon.jonesl@nelincs.gov.uk