The document discusses modern architecture and its key principles. It covers programming paradigms like object-oriented programming and functional programming and how they relate to architecture. It also discusses SOLID design principles, components, attributes of modern architecture like loose coupling and high cohesion, and patterns like domain-driven design and event sourcing. Specific architectures like microservices are mentioned. Case studies are presented and questions are posed about architectural topics.
Kevin Huang: AWS San Francisco Startup Day, 9/7/17
Architecture: When, how, and if to adopt microservices - Microservices are not for everyone! If you're a small shop, a monolith provides a great amount of value and reduces the complexities involved. However as your company grows, this monolith becomes more difficult to maintain. We’ll look at how microservices allow you to easily deploy and debug atomic pieces of infrastructure which allows for increased velocity in reliable, tested, and consistent deploys. We’ll look into key metrics you can use to identify the right time to begin the transition from monolith to microservices.
Introduction To DevOps | Devops Tutorial For Beginners | DevOps Training For ...Simplilearn
This presentation on "Introduction to DevOps" will help you understand what is waterfall model, what is an agile model, what is DevOps, DevOps phases, DevOps tools and DevOps advantages. In traditional software development lifecycle, there is a lot of gap between development and operations team. DevOps addresses the gap between developers and operations. The development team will submit the application to the operations team for implementation. Operations team will monitor the application and provide relevant feedback to developers. According to DevOps practices, the workflow in software development and delivery is divided into 8 phases, Now, let us get started and understand these 8 phases in DevOps.
Below topics are explained in this "Introduction to DevOps" presentation:
1. Waterfall model
2. Agile model
3. What is DevOps?
4. DevOps phases
5. DevOps tools
6. DevOps advantages
Simplilearn's DevOps Certification Training Course will prepare you for a career in DevOps, the fast-growing field that bridges the gap between software developers and operations. You’ll become an expert in the principles of continuous development and deployment, automation of configuration management, inter-team collaboration and IT service agility, using modern DevOps tools such as Git, Docker, Jenkins, Puppet and Nagios. DevOps jobs are highly paid and in great demand, so start on your path today.
Why learn DevOps?
Simplilearn’s DevOps training course is designed to help you become a DevOps practitioner and apply the latest in DevOps methodology to automate your software development lifecycle right out of the class. You will master configuration management; continuous integration deployment, delivery and monitoring using DevOps tools such as Git, Docker, Jenkins, Puppet and Nagios in a practical, hands-on and interactive approach. The Devops training course focuses heavily on the use of Docker containers, a technology that is revolutionizing the way apps are deployed in the cloud today and is a critical skillset to master in the cloud age.
Who should take this course?
DevOps career opportunities are thriving worldwide. DevOps was featured as one of the 11 best jobs in America for 2017, according to CBS News, and data from Payscale.com shows that DevOps Managers earn as much as $122,234 per year, with DevOps engineers making as much as $151,461. DevOps jobs are the third-highest tech role ranked by employer demand on Indeed.com but have the second-highest talent deficit.
1. This DevOps training course will be of benefit the following professional roles:
2. Software Developers
3. Technical Project Managers
4. Architects
5. Operations Support
6. Deployment engineers
7. IT managers
8. Development managers
Learn more at: https://www.simplilearn.com/
This slideshow walks through common and popular Architectural design patterns such as Data-Driven Architecture, Micro-Services, Layered Architecture, and Micro-Kernel Architecture. I also go over the pros and cons and in which scenario each architecture is preferable
In this session we will take an introduction look to Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery workflow.
This is an introduction session to CI/CD and is best for people new to the CI/CD concepts, or looking to brush up on benefits of using these approaches.
* What CI & CD actually are
* What good looks like
* A method for tracking confidence
* The business value from CI/CD
Kevin Huang: AWS San Francisco Startup Day, 9/7/17
Architecture: When, how, and if to adopt microservices - Microservices are not for everyone! If you're a small shop, a monolith provides a great amount of value and reduces the complexities involved. However as your company grows, this monolith becomes more difficult to maintain. We’ll look at how microservices allow you to easily deploy and debug atomic pieces of infrastructure which allows for increased velocity in reliable, tested, and consistent deploys. We’ll look into key metrics you can use to identify the right time to begin the transition from monolith to microservices.
Introduction To DevOps | Devops Tutorial For Beginners | DevOps Training For ...Simplilearn
This presentation on "Introduction to DevOps" will help you understand what is waterfall model, what is an agile model, what is DevOps, DevOps phases, DevOps tools and DevOps advantages. In traditional software development lifecycle, there is a lot of gap between development and operations team. DevOps addresses the gap between developers and operations. The development team will submit the application to the operations team for implementation. Operations team will monitor the application and provide relevant feedback to developers. According to DevOps practices, the workflow in software development and delivery is divided into 8 phases, Now, let us get started and understand these 8 phases in DevOps.
Below topics are explained in this "Introduction to DevOps" presentation:
1. Waterfall model
2. Agile model
3. What is DevOps?
4. DevOps phases
5. DevOps tools
6. DevOps advantages
Simplilearn's DevOps Certification Training Course will prepare you for a career in DevOps, the fast-growing field that bridges the gap between software developers and operations. You’ll become an expert in the principles of continuous development and deployment, automation of configuration management, inter-team collaboration and IT service agility, using modern DevOps tools such as Git, Docker, Jenkins, Puppet and Nagios. DevOps jobs are highly paid and in great demand, so start on your path today.
Why learn DevOps?
Simplilearn’s DevOps training course is designed to help you become a DevOps practitioner and apply the latest in DevOps methodology to automate your software development lifecycle right out of the class. You will master configuration management; continuous integration deployment, delivery and monitoring using DevOps tools such as Git, Docker, Jenkins, Puppet and Nagios in a practical, hands-on and interactive approach. The Devops training course focuses heavily on the use of Docker containers, a technology that is revolutionizing the way apps are deployed in the cloud today and is a critical skillset to master in the cloud age.
Who should take this course?
DevOps career opportunities are thriving worldwide. DevOps was featured as one of the 11 best jobs in America for 2017, according to CBS News, and data from Payscale.com shows that DevOps Managers earn as much as $122,234 per year, with DevOps engineers making as much as $151,461. DevOps jobs are the third-highest tech role ranked by employer demand on Indeed.com but have the second-highest talent deficit.
1. This DevOps training course will be of benefit the following professional roles:
2. Software Developers
3. Technical Project Managers
4. Architects
5. Operations Support
6. Deployment engineers
7. IT managers
8. Development managers
Learn more at: https://www.simplilearn.com/
This slideshow walks through common and popular Architectural design patterns such as Data-Driven Architecture, Micro-Services, Layered Architecture, and Micro-Kernel Architecture. I also go over the pros and cons and in which scenario each architecture is preferable
In this session we will take an introduction look to Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery workflow.
This is an introduction session to CI/CD and is best for people new to the CI/CD concepts, or looking to brush up on benefits of using these approaches.
* What CI & CD actually are
* What good looks like
* A method for tracking confidence
* The business value from CI/CD
A introduction to Microservices Architecture: definition, characterstics, framworks, success stories. It contains a demo about implementation of microservices with Spring Boot, Spring cloud an Eureka.
An introduction to fundamental architecture conceptswweinmeyer79
(Note: This is a very dated version of this popular deck, as SlideShare does not provide authors with a mechanism to update their documents. If interested in the latest version, feel free to message me on LinkedIn or at wweinmeyer@gmail.com. Also, feel free to ask SlideShare to bring back the ability to update posted documents.)
A discussion of the fundamentals you need to nail in your architecture practice:
- Architecture vs. Design
- Conceptual vs. Logical vs. Physical architecture
- Viewpoint Frameworks
- Architecture Domains
- Architecture Tiers
You are free to use/copy this information but if you do so, please include an acknowledgement
Design Thinking needs to be supplemented by support from software architecture teams for favorable outcomes when it comes to digital solutions. This presentation explores the relationship between the two disciplines in the context of building innovative solutions.
The presentation from our online webinar "Design patterns for microservice architecture".
Full video from webinar available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=826aAmG06KM
If you’re a CTO or a Lead Developer and you’re planning to design service-oriented architecture, it’s definitely a webinar tailored to your needs. Adrian Zmenda, our Lead Dev, will explain:
- when microservice architecture is a safe bet and what are some good alternatives
- what are the pros and cons of the most popular design patterns (API Gateway, Backend for Frontend and more)
- how to ensure that the communication between services is done right and what to do in case of connection issues
- why we’ve decided to use a monorepo (monolithic repository)
- what we’ve learned from using the remote procedure call framework gRPC
- how to monitor the efficiency of individual services and whole SOA-based systems.
Je vous partage l'un des présentations que j'ai réalisé lorsque j'étais élève ingénieur pour le module 'Anglais Business ' , utile pour les étudiants souhaitant préparer une présentation en anglais sur les Design Pattern - ou les patrons de conception .
Docker is the world’s leading software container platform. Developers use Docker to eliminate “works on my machine” problems when collaborating on code with co-workers. Operators use Docker to run and manage apps side-by-side in isolated containers to get better compute density. Enterprises use Docker to build agile software delivery pipelines to ship new features faster, more securely and with confidence for both Linux and Windows Server apps.
Security in CI/CD Pipelines: Tips for DevOps EngineersDevOps.com
While DevOps is becoming a new norm for most of the companies, security is typically still behind. The new architectures create a number of new process considerations and technical issues. In this practical talk, we will present an overview of the practical issues that go into making security a part of DevOps processes. Will cover incorporating security into existing CI/CD pipelines and tools DevOps professionals need to know to implement the automation and adhere to secure coding practices.
Join Stepan Ilyin, Chief Product Officer at Wallarm for an engaging conversation where you’ll learn:
Methodologies and tooling for dynamic and static security testing
Composite and OSS license analysis benefits
Secrets and analysis and secrets management approaches in distributed applications
Security automation and integration in CI/CD
Apps, APIs and workloads protection in cloud-native K8s enabled environments
The introduction covers the following
1. What are Microservices and why should be use this paradigm?
2. 12 factor apps and how Microservices make it easier to create them
3. Characteristics of Microservices
Note: Please download the slides to view animations.
DevOps is a concept that includes, among other things, software development, operations, and services. DevOps is a blend of “development” and “operations.” It focuses on interaction, coordination, and integration between software developers and IT operations staff. If you are among the companies having requirements for hire DevOps engineer, Here is a detailed guide to hire DevOps engineer.
Evolving Architecture and Organization - Lessons from Google and eBayRandy Shoup
Keynote at DevOpsDays Cuba
Successful Internet companies are built on a foundation of excellent culture, efficient organization, and solid technology. As a company needs to scale, all of these parts of the foundation need to grow and scale with it. This session covers modern best practices at innovative companies in Silicon Valley for scaling culture, organization, and technology. Driven primarily by the presenter's experience ranging from small Valley startups to Google and eBay, it discusses:
* Organizing small, fast-moving engineering teams
* Building a scalable system out of smaller microservices
* Maintaining a culture of ownership and collaboration
* Developing effective engineering processes of continuous integration and continuous delivery
A introduction to Microservices Architecture: definition, characterstics, framworks, success stories. It contains a demo about implementation of microservices with Spring Boot, Spring cloud an Eureka.
An introduction to fundamental architecture conceptswweinmeyer79
(Note: This is a very dated version of this popular deck, as SlideShare does not provide authors with a mechanism to update their documents. If interested in the latest version, feel free to message me on LinkedIn or at wweinmeyer@gmail.com. Also, feel free to ask SlideShare to bring back the ability to update posted documents.)
A discussion of the fundamentals you need to nail in your architecture practice:
- Architecture vs. Design
- Conceptual vs. Logical vs. Physical architecture
- Viewpoint Frameworks
- Architecture Domains
- Architecture Tiers
You are free to use/copy this information but if you do so, please include an acknowledgement
Design Thinking needs to be supplemented by support from software architecture teams for favorable outcomes when it comes to digital solutions. This presentation explores the relationship between the two disciplines in the context of building innovative solutions.
The presentation from our online webinar "Design patterns for microservice architecture".
Full video from webinar available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=826aAmG06KM
If you’re a CTO or a Lead Developer and you’re planning to design service-oriented architecture, it’s definitely a webinar tailored to your needs. Adrian Zmenda, our Lead Dev, will explain:
- when microservice architecture is a safe bet and what are some good alternatives
- what are the pros and cons of the most popular design patterns (API Gateway, Backend for Frontend and more)
- how to ensure that the communication between services is done right and what to do in case of connection issues
- why we’ve decided to use a monorepo (monolithic repository)
- what we’ve learned from using the remote procedure call framework gRPC
- how to monitor the efficiency of individual services and whole SOA-based systems.
Je vous partage l'un des présentations que j'ai réalisé lorsque j'étais élève ingénieur pour le module 'Anglais Business ' , utile pour les étudiants souhaitant préparer une présentation en anglais sur les Design Pattern - ou les patrons de conception .
Docker is the world’s leading software container platform. Developers use Docker to eliminate “works on my machine” problems when collaborating on code with co-workers. Operators use Docker to run and manage apps side-by-side in isolated containers to get better compute density. Enterprises use Docker to build agile software delivery pipelines to ship new features faster, more securely and with confidence for both Linux and Windows Server apps.
Security in CI/CD Pipelines: Tips for DevOps EngineersDevOps.com
While DevOps is becoming a new norm for most of the companies, security is typically still behind. The new architectures create a number of new process considerations and technical issues. In this practical talk, we will present an overview of the practical issues that go into making security a part of DevOps processes. Will cover incorporating security into existing CI/CD pipelines and tools DevOps professionals need to know to implement the automation and adhere to secure coding practices.
Join Stepan Ilyin, Chief Product Officer at Wallarm for an engaging conversation where you’ll learn:
Methodologies and tooling for dynamic and static security testing
Composite and OSS license analysis benefits
Secrets and analysis and secrets management approaches in distributed applications
Security automation and integration in CI/CD
Apps, APIs and workloads protection in cloud-native K8s enabled environments
The introduction covers the following
1. What are Microservices and why should be use this paradigm?
2. 12 factor apps and how Microservices make it easier to create them
3. Characteristics of Microservices
Note: Please download the slides to view animations.
DevOps is a concept that includes, among other things, software development, operations, and services. DevOps is a blend of “development” and “operations.” It focuses on interaction, coordination, and integration between software developers and IT operations staff. If you are among the companies having requirements for hire DevOps engineer, Here is a detailed guide to hire DevOps engineer.
Evolving Architecture and Organization - Lessons from Google and eBayRandy Shoup
Keynote at DevOpsDays Cuba
Successful Internet companies are built on a foundation of excellent culture, efficient organization, and solid technology. As a company needs to scale, all of these parts of the foundation need to grow and scale with it. This session covers modern best practices at innovative companies in Silicon Valley for scaling culture, organization, and technology. Driven primarily by the presenter's experience ranging from small Valley startups to Google and eBay, it discusses:
* Organizing small, fast-moving engineering teams
* Building a scalable system out of smaller microservices
* Maintaining a culture of ownership and collaboration
* Developing effective engineering processes of continuous integration and continuous delivery
Pointcut Rejuvenation: Recovering Pointcut Expressions in Evolving Aspect-Ori...Raffi Khatchadourian
Pointcut fragility is a well-documented problem in Aspect-Oriented Programming; changes to the base-code can lead to join points incorrectly falling in or out of the scope of pointcuts. In this paper, we present an automated approach that limits fragility problems by providing mechanical assistance in pointcut maintenance. The approach is based on harnessing arbitrarily deep structural commonalities between program elements corresponding to join points selected by a pointcut. The extracted patterns are then applied to later versions to offer suggestions of new join points that may require inclusion. To illustrate that the motivation behind our proposal is well founded, we first empirically establish that join points captured by a single pointcut typically portray a significant amount of unique structural commonality by analyzing patterns extracted from twenty-three AspectJ programs. Then, we demonstrate the usefulness of our technique by rejuvenating pointcuts in multiple versions of three of these programs. The results show that our parameterized heuristic algorithm was able to accurately and automatically infer the majority of new join points in subsequent software versions that were not captured by the original pointcuts.
* What is Engineering?
* Who is an Engineer?
* The reasons to become an Engineer
* What is Software Engineering?
* Software Engineering: History
* The principles of Software Engineering
* Who is a Software Engineer?
* The reasons to become Software Engineer
* Requirements of being Software Engineer
* The Areas of Software Engineers
* The working areas of Software Engineers
* Difference between Computer Science and Software Engineering
* Pros and Cons of being Software Engineer
* A Software Engineer Responsibilities
* The Most Popular Software Development Methodologies(Waterfall, Rapid Application, Agile and DevOps) Development Methodology
* Version control
* Centralized Version Control
This is take two of the presentation, some things added, some removed, but still the regurgitation is best..
The purpose is to raise your awareness of software architecture in light of modern day agile development. Disciplines to incorporate and reconsider
Best practices for using open source software in the enterpriseMarcel de Vries
Most of us understand the benefits of using open source software (OSS) and libraries. Heck, even Microsoft embraces it, so why can’t you adopt it as well in your enterprise? Open source can be a blessing and a curse at the same time. We probably all remember incidents like the “heart bleed” vulnerability in a popular open source implementation of SSL. So, if open source becomes more and more prevalent, how can we cope with the challenges that lay at hand? We will be challenged with all sorts of questions in the enterprise: What are the license implications when I take a dependency on a library with a viral type of license? What version of open source libraries are we using and are they the choice of the generic public or did we select one we now need to maintain ourselves? Are there known vulnerabilities in the libraries we use, and if so, are we affected by that? In this session, we take a practical approach to using open source libraries in product development for the enterprise. We touch briefly on the license types and the ones to look out for. We show you how an artefact repository system can help you to answer a lot of the tough questions. Learn how to integrate a system that is very popular, called Nexus, in your continuous deployment strategy and ensure a frictionless experience for your developers. We show integration with NuGet and how to manage open source dependencies using proxy facilities so you can ensure only a curated set of libraries are used, and meet compliance requirements for your business.
Check out the webinar slides to learn more about how XfilesPro transforms Salesforce document management by leveraging its world-class applications. For more details, please connect with sales@xfilespro.com
If you want to watch the on-demand webinar, please click here: https://www.xfilespro.com/webinars/salesforce-document-management-2-0-smarter-faster-better/
We describe the deployment and use of Globus Compute for remote computation. This content is aimed at researchers who wish to compute on remote resources using a unified programming interface, as well as system administrators who will deploy and operate Globus Compute services on their research computing infrastructure.
Prosigns: Transforming Business with Tailored Technology SolutionsProsigns
Unlocking Business Potential: Tailored Technology Solutions by Prosigns
Discover how Prosigns, a leading technology solutions provider, partners with businesses to drive innovation and success. Our presentation showcases our comprehensive range of services, including custom software development, web and mobile app development, AI & ML solutions, blockchain integration, DevOps services, and Microsoft Dynamics 365 support.
Custom Software Development: Prosigns specializes in creating bespoke software solutions that cater to your unique business needs. Our team of experts works closely with you to understand your requirements and deliver tailor-made software that enhances efficiency and drives growth.
Web and Mobile App Development: From responsive websites to intuitive mobile applications, Prosigns develops cutting-edge solutions that engage users and deliver seamless experiences across devices.
AI & ML Solutions: Harnessing the power of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Prosigns provides smart solutions that automate processes, provide valuable insights, and drive informed decision-making.
Blockchain Integration: Prosigns offers comprehensive blockchain solutions, including development, integration, and consulting services, enabling businesses to leverage blockchain technology for enhanced security, transparency, and efficiency.
DevOps Services: Prosigns' DevOps services streamline development and operations processes, ensuring faster and more reliable software delivery through automation and continuous integration.
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Support: Prosigns provides comprehensive support and maintenance services for Microsoft Dynamics 365, ensuring your system is always up-to-date, secure, and running smoothly.
Learn how our collaborative approach and dedication to excellence help businesses achieve their goals and stay ahead in today's digital landscape. From concept to deployment, Prosigns is your trusted partner for transforming ideas into reality and unlocking the full potential of your business.
Join us on a journey of innovation and growth. Let's partner for success with Prosigns.
Graspan: A Big Data System for Big Code AnalysisAftab Hussain
We built a disk-based parallel graph system, Graspan, that uses a novel edge-pair centric computation model to compute dynamic transitive closures on very large program graphs.
We implement context-sensitive pointer/alias and dataflow analyses on Graspan. An evaluation of these analyses on large codebases such as Linux shows that their Graspan implementations scale to millions of lines of code and are much simpler than their original implementations.
These analyses were used to augment the existing checkers; these augmented checkers found 132 new NULL pointer bugs and 1308 unnecessary NULL tests in Linux 4.4.0-rc5, PostgreSQL 8.3.9, and Apache httpd 2.2.18.
- Accepted in ASPLOS ‘17, Xi’an, China.
- Featured in the tutorial, Systemized Program Analyses: A Big Data Perspective on Static Analysis Scalability, ASPLOS ‘17.
- Invited for presentation at SoCal PLS ‘16.
- Invited for poster presentation at PLDI SRC ‘16.
How to Position Your Globus Data Portal for Success Ten Good PracticesGlobus
Science gateways allow science and engineering communities to access shared data, software, computing services, and instruments. Science gateways have gained a lot of traction in the last twenty years, as evidenced by projects such as the Science Gateways Community Institute (SGCI) and the Center of Excellence on Science Gateways (SGX3) in the US, The Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC) and its platforms in Australia, and the projects around Virtual Research Environments in Europe. A few mature frameworks have evolved with their different strengths and foci and have been taken up by a larger community such as the Globus Data Portal, Hubzero, Tapis, and Galaxy. However, even when gateways are built on successful frameworks, they continue to face the challenges of ongoing maintenance costs and how to meet the ever-expanding needs of the community they serve with enhanced features. It is not uncommon that gateways with compelling use cases are nonetheless unable to get past the prototype phase and become a full production service, or if they do, they don't survive more than a couple of years. While there is no guaranteed pathway to success, it seems likely that for any gateway there is a need for a strong community and/or solid funding streams to create and sustain its success. With over twenty years of examples to draw from, this presentation goes into detail for ten factors common to successful and enduring gateways that effectively serve as best practices for any new or developing gateway.
Innovating Inference - Remote Triggering of Large Language Models on HPC Clus...Globus
Large Language Models (LLMs) are currently the center of attention in the tech world, particularly for their potential to advance research. In this presentation, we'll explore a straightforward and effective method for quickly initiating inference runs on supercomputers using the vLLM tool with Globus Compute, specifically on the Polaris system at ALCF. We'll begin by briefly discussing the popularity and applications of LLMs in various fields. Following this, we will introduce the vLLM tool, and explain how it integrates with Globus Compute to efficiently manage LLM operations on Polaris. Attendees will learn the practical aspects of setting up and remotely triggering LLMs from local machines, focusing on ease of use and efficiency. This talk is ideal for researchers and practitioners looking to leverage the power of LLMs in their work, offering a clear guide to harnessing supercomputing resources for quick and effective LLM inference.
AI Fusion Buddy Review: Brand New, Groundbreaking Gemini-Powered AI AppGoogle
AI Fusion Buddy Review: Brand New, Groundbreaking Gemini-Powered AI App
👉👉 Click Here To Get More Info 👇👇
https://sumonreview.com/ai-fusion-buddy-review
AI Fusion Buddy Review: Key Features
✅Create Stunning AI App Suite Fully Powered By Google's Latest AI technology, Gemini
✅Use Gemini to Build high-converting Converting Sales Video Scripts, ad copies, Trending Articles, blogs, etc.100% unique!
✅Create Ultra-HD graphics with a single keyword or phrase that commands 10x eyeballs!
✅Fully automated AI articles bulk generation!
✅Auto-post or schedule stunning AI content across all your accounts at once—WordPress, Facebook, LinkedIn, Blogger, and more.
✅With one keyword or URL, generate complete websites, landing pages, and more…
✅Automatically create & sell AI content, graphics, websites, landing pages, & all that gets you paid non-stop 24*7.
✅Pre-built High-Converting 100+ website Templates and 2000+ graphic templates logos, banners, and thumbnail images in Trending Niches.
✅Say goodbye to wasting time logging into multiple Chat GPT & AI Apps once & for all!
✅Save over $5000 per year and kick out dependency on third parties completely!
✅Brand New App: Not available anywhere else!
✅ Beginner-friendly!
✅ZERO upfront cost or any extra expenses
✅Risk-Free: 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee!
✅Commercial License included!
See My Other Reviews Article:
(1) AI Genie Review: https://sumonreview.com/ai-genie-review
(2) SocioWave Review: https://sumonreview.com/sociowave-review
(3) AI Partner & Profit Review: https://sumonreview.com/ai-partner-profit-review
(4) AI Ebook Suite Review: https://sumonreview.com/ai-ebook-suite-review
#AIFusionBuddyReview,
#AIFusionBuddyFeatures,
#AIFusionBuddyPricing,
#AIFusionBuddyProsandCons,
#AIFusionBuddyTutorial,
#AIFusionBuddyUserExperience
#AIFusionBuddyforBeginners,
#AIFusionBuddyBenefits,
#AIFusionBuddyComparison,
#AIFusionBuddyInstallation,
#AIFusionBuddyRefundPolicy,
#AIFusionBuddyDemo,
#AIFusionBuddyMaintenanceFees,
#AIFusionBuddyNewbieFriendly,
#WhatIsAIFusionBuddy?,
#HowDoesAIFusionBuddyWorks
Globus Compute wth IRI Workflows - GlobusWorld 2024Globus
As part of the DOE Integrated Research Infrastructure (IRI) program, NERSC at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab and ALCF at Argonne National Lab are working closely with General Atomics on accelerating the computing requirements of the DIII-D experiment. As part of the work the team is investigating ways to speedup the time to solution for many different parts of the DIII-D workflow including how they run jobs on HPC systems. One of these routes is looking at Globus Compute as a way to replace the current method for managing tasks and we describe a brief proof of concept showing how Globus Compute could help to schedule jobs and be a tool to connect compute at different facilities.
Top Features to Include in Your Winzo Clone App for Business Growth (4).pptxrickgrimesss22
Discover the essential features to incorporate in your Winzo clone app to boost business growth, enhance user engagement, and drive revenue. Learn how to create a compelling gaming experience that stands out in the competitive market.
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FMESafe Software
In this second installment of our Essentials of Automations webinar series, we’ll explore the landscape of triggers and actions, guiding you through the nuances of authoring and adapting workspaces for seamless automations. Gain an understanding of the full spectrum of triggers and actions available in FME, empowering you to enhance your workspaces for efficient automation.
We’ll kick things off by showcasing the most commonly used event-based triggers, introducing you to various automation workflows like manual triggers, schedules, directory watchers, and more. Plus, see how these elements play out in real scenarios.
Whether you’re tweaking your current setup or building from the ground up, this session will arm you with the tools and insights needed to transform your FME usage into a powerhouse of productivity. Join us to discover effective strategies that simplify complex processes, enhancing your productivity and transforming your data management practices with FME. Let’s turn complexity into clarity and make your workspaces work wonders!
How Recreation Management Software Can Streamline Your Operations.pptxwottaspaceseo
Recreation management software streamlines operations by automating key tasks such as scheduling, registration, and payment processing, reducing manual workload and errors. It provides centralized management of facilities, classes, and events, ensuring efficient resource allocation and facility usage. The software offers user-friendly online portals for easy access to bookings and program information, enhancing customer experience. Real-time reporting and data analytics deliver insights into attendance and preferences, aiding in strategic decision-making. Additionally, effective communication tools keep participants and staff informed with timely updates. Overall, recreation management software enhances efficiency, improves service delivery, and boosts customer satisfaction.
Gamify Your Mind; The Secret Sauce to Delivering Success, Continuously Improv...Shahin Sheidaei
Games are powerful teaching tools, fostering hands-on engagement and fun. But they require careful consideration to succeed. Join me to explore factors in running and selecting games, ensuring they serve as effective teaching tools. Learn to maintain focus on learning objectives while playing, and how to measure the ROI of gaming in education. Discover strategies for pitching gaming to leadership. This session offers insights, tips, and examples for coaches, team leads, and enterprise leaders seeking to teach from simple to complex concepts.
Software Engineering, Software Consulting, Tech Lead, Spring Boot, Spring Cloud, Spring Core, Spring JDBC, Spring Transaction, Spring MVC, OpenShift Cloud Platform, Kafka, REST, SOAP, LLD & HLD.
Introducing Crescat - Event Management Software for Venues, Festivals and Eve...Crescat
Crescat is industry-trusted event management software, built by event professionals for event professionals. Founded in 2017, we have three key products tailored for the live event industry.
Crescat Event for concert promoters and event agencies. Crescat Venue for music venues, conference centers, wedding venues, concert halls and more. And Crescat Festival for festivals, conferences and complex events.
With a wide range of popular features such as event scheduling, shift management, volunteer and crew coordination, artist booking and much more, Crescat is designed for customisation and ease-of-use.
Over 125,000 events have been planned in Crescat and with hundreds of customers of all shapes and sizes, from boutique event agencies through to international concert promoters, Crescat is rigged for success. What's more, we highly value feedback from our users and we are constantly improving our software with updates, new features and improvements.
If you plan events, run a venue or produce festivals and you're looking for ways to make your life easier, then we have a solution for you. Try our software for free or schedule a no-obligation demo with one of our product specialists today at crescat.io
May Marketo Masterclass, London MUG May 22 2024.pdfAdele Miller
Can't make Adobe Summit in Vegas? No sweat because the EMEA Marketo Engage Champions are coming to London to share their Summit sessions, insights and more!
This is a MUG with a twist you don't want to miss.
Listen to the keynote address and hear about the latest developments from Rachana Ananthakrishnan and Ian Foster who review the updates to the Globus Platform and Service, and the relevance of Globus to the scientific community as an automation platform to accelerate scientific discovery.
A Study of Variable-Role-based Feature Enrichment in Neural Models of CodeAftab Hussain
Understanding variable roles in code has been found to be helpful by students
in learning programming -- could variable roles help deep neural models in
performing coding tasks? We do an exploratory study.
- These are slides of the talk given at InteNSE'23: The 1st International Workshop on Interpretability and Robustness in Neural Software Engineering, co-located with the 45th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2023, Melbourne Australia
2. Extend your software engineering teams
Ahmed Marzouk
Senior Software Engineer
Linkedin|Medium|GitHub|SO|IntegrantProfile
3. Extend your software engineering teams
Agenda
• What is modern architecture?
• Introduction
• Programming paradigms and architecture
• SOLID Design Principles and Architecture
• Components
• Modern Architecture attributes and patterns
• Demo
7. Extend your software engineering teams
• High level decisions (The decisions that are hard to change).
• Including non functional decisions.
• Aims to reduces cost of changes and resources.
16. Extend your software engineering teams
It’s so easy to build a software, but not every software built right!
17. Extend your software engineering teams
The measure of design quality is simply the measure of the effort
required to meet the needs of the customer. If that effort is low,
and stays low throughout the lifetime of the system, the design is
good. If that effort grows with each new release, the design is bad.
It’s as simple as that.
30. Extend your software engineering teams
• Polymorphism was exists before OOP
• OOP gives us much safer and much more convenient polymorphism.
31. Extend your software engineering teams
• The power of Polymorphism > plugin architecture without any change
in the core.
• OO allows the plugin architecture to be used anywhere, for anything.
35. Extend your software engineering teams
What is OO? There are many opinions and many answers to this
question. To the software architect, however, the answer is clear: OO is
the ability, through the use of polymorphism, to gain absolute control
over every source code dependency in the system. It allows the
architect to create a plugin architecture, in which modules that contain
high-level policies are independent of modules that contain low-level
details. The low-level details are relegated to plugin modules that can
be deployed and developed independently from the modules that
contain high-level policies.
36. Extend your software engineering teams
• Each of these three paradigms has taken something away from us.
Each restricts some aspect of the way we write code. None of them
has added to our power or our capabilities.
• What we have learned over the last half-century is what not to do.
• The rules of software are the same today as they were in 1946, when
Alan Turing wrote the very first code that would execute in an
electronic computer. The tools have changed, and the hardware has
changed, but the essence of software remains the same.
• It’s not enough.
37.
38. Extend your software engineering teams
• SOLID Principles tell us how to arrange our functions and data
structures into classes, and how those classes should be
interconnected.
• The goal of the principles is the creation of mid-level software
structures.
39. Extend your software engineering teams
• Only one reason to change - Conway’s law
• The most miss understood principle.
• A module should have one, and only one, reason to change == A
module should be responsible to one, and only one, actor
42. Extend your software engineering teams
• A software artifact should be open for extension but closed for
modification.
• The most fundamental reason that we study software architecture.
43. Extend your software engineering teams
• Square is not a rectangle in behavior.
• The best way to understand the LSP from an architectural viewpoint is
to look at what happens to the architecture of a system when the
principle is violated.
• Taxi Restful example.
48. Extend your software engineering teams
• What is component?
• COMPONENT COHESION
• REP: The Reuse/Release Equivalence Principle
• CCP: The Common Closure Principle
• CRP: The Common Reuse Principle
49. Extend your software engineering teams
• The granule of reuse is the granule of release.
• From a software design and architecture point of view, this principle
means that the classes and modules that are formed into a
component must belong to a cohesive group.
• Classes and modules that are grouped together into a component
should be releasable together.
50. Extend your software engineering teams
• Gather into components those classes that change for the same
reasons and at the same times. Separate into different components
those classes that change at different times and for different reasons.
• This is the Single Responsibility Principle restated for components.
• This principle is closely associated with the Open Closed Principle
(OCP).
51. Extend your software engineering teams
• Don’t force users of a component to depend on things they don’t
need.
• RELATION TO ISP
52.
53. Extend your software engineering teams
• Keeping Options Open
• High Cohesion
• Autonomous (Independent in dev, deploy, team, versioning)
• Domain Centric
• Testability
• Automation
63. Extend your software engineering teams
• Clean Architecture: A Craftsman's Guide to Software Structure and
Design (Robert C. Martin Series) 1st Edition
• Modern Software Architecture: Domain Models, CQRS, and Event
Sourcing – Pluralsight
• Clean Architecture: Patterns, Practices, and Principles – Pluralsight
• Microservices Architecture Pluralsight
Editor's Notes
- What is modern architecture?
- What is modern architecture?
So, it’s a journey not a destination you can take it with a lot of observations and wrong decisions, so don’t reinvent the wheel and follow the best practice.
Confusion between design and architecture because there is no separate line between low and high-level decisions but always a continuous line from the highest to the lowest:
There has been a lot of confusion about design and architecture over the years. What is design? What is architecture? What are the differences between the two?
The word “architecture” is often used in the context of something at a high level that is divorced from the lower-level details, whereas “design” more often seems to imply structures and decisions at a lower level. But this usage is nonsensical when you look at what a real architect does.
For example: Building a house. In short, I see all the little details that support all the high-level decisions. I also see that those low-level details and high-level decisions are part of the whole design of the house. And so, it is with software design. The low-level details and the high-level structure are all part of the same whole. They form a continuous fabric that defines the shape of the system. You can’t have one without the other; indeed, no clear dividing line separates them. There is simply a continuum of decisions from the highest to the lowest levels.
Each of the paradigms removes capabilities from the programmer. None of them adds new capabilities. Each imposes some kind of extra discipline that is negative in its intent. The paradigms tell us what not to do, more than they tell us what to do.
Functional Decomposition is the process of taking a complex process and breaking it down into its smaller, simpler parts.
Structured programming allows modules to be recursively decomposed into provable units, which in turn means that modules can be functionally decomposed. That is, you can take a large-scale problem statement and decompose it into high-level functions. Each of those functions can then be decomposed into lower-level functions, ad infinitum. Moreover, each of those decomposed functions can be represented using the restricted control structures of structured programming.
How that is important for architecture?
It is this ability to create falsifiable units of programming that makes structured programming valuable today. This is the reason that modern languages do not typically support unrestrained goto statements. Moreover, at the architectural level, this is why we still consider functional decomposition to be one of our best practices.
Instead, my goal here is to point out something very dramatic about the difference between the Clojure and Java programs. The Java program uses a mutable variable —a variable that changes state during the execution of the program. That variable is i—the loop control variable. No such mutable variable exists in the Clojure program. In the Clojure program, variables like x are initialized, but they are never modified. This leads us to a surprising statement: Variables in functional languages do not vary.
1 - Why is this point important as an architectural consideration? Why would an architect be concerned with the mutability of variables? The answer is absurdly simple: All race conditions, deadlock conditions, and concurrent update problems are due to mutable variables. You cannot have a race condition or a concurrent update problem if no variable is ever updated. You cannot have deadlocks without mutable locks.
2-
Some folks fall back on three magic words to explain the nature of OO: encapsulation, inheritance, and polymorphism. The implication is that OO is the proper admixture of these three things, or at least that an OO language must support these three things.
The reason encapsulation is cited as part of the definition of OO is that OO languages provide easy and effective encapsulation of data and function. As a result, a line can be drawn around a cohesive set of data and functions. Outside of that line, the data is hidden and only some of the functions are known. We see this concept in action as the private data members and the public member functions of a class.
Clients of the header file point.h know about the member variables x and y! The compiler will prevent access to them, but the client still knows they exist. For example, if those member names are changed, the point.cc file must be recompiled! Encapsulation has been broken. Indeed, the way encapsulation is partially repaired is by introducing the public, private, and protected keywords into the language. This, however, was a hack necessitated by the technical need for the compiler to see those variables in the header file. Java and C# simply abolished the header/implementation split altogether, thereby weakening encapsulation even more. In these languages, it is impossible to separate the declaration and definition of a class. For these reasons, it is difficult to accept that OO depends on strong encapsulation. Indeed, many OO languages2 have little or no enforced encapsulation.
This kind of trickery was a common practice4 of programmers prior to the advent of OO. In fact, such trickery is how C++ implements single inheritance. Thus we might say that we had a kind of inheritance long before OO languages were invented. That statement wouldn’t quite be true, though. We had a trick, but it’s not nearly as convenient as true inheritance. Moreover, multiple inheritance is a considerably more difficult to achieve by such trickery. Note also that in main.c, I was forced to cast the NamedPoint arguments to Point. In a real OO language, such upcasting would be implicit. It’s fair to say that while OO languages did not give us something completely brand new, it did make the masquerading of data structures significantly more convenient. To recap: We can award no point to OO for encapsulation, and perhaps a half-point for inheritance. So far, that’s not such a great score. But there’s one more attribute to consider.
Polymorphism was exists before OOP in form of not safe pointer to functions and developers used to do those tricks a lot.
OO languages may not have given us polymorphism, but they have made it much safer and much more convenient. The problem with explicitly using pointers to functions to create polymorphic
behavior is that pointers to functions are dangerous. Such use is driven by a set of manual conventions. You have to remember to follow the convention to initialize those pointers. You have to remember to follow the convention to call all your functions through those pointers. If any programmer fails to remember these conventions, the resulting bug can be devilishly hard to track down and eliminate. OO languages eliminate these conventions and, therefore, these dangers. Using an OO language makes polymorphism trivial. That fact provides an enormous power that old C programmers could only dream of. On this basis, we can conclude that OO imposes discipline on indirect transfer of control.
It’s the most important result of polymorphism.
For main to call one of the high-level functions, it had to mention the name of the module that contained that function In C, this was a #include. In Java, it was an import statement. In C#, it was a using statement. Indeed, every caller was forced to mention the name of the module that contained the callee. This requirement presented the software architect with few, if any, options. The flow of control was dictated by the behavior of the system, and the source code dependencies were dictated by that flow of control.
When polymorphism is brought into play, however, something very different can happen.
In Figure 5.2, module HL1 calls the F() function in module ML1. The fact that it calls this function through an interface is a source code contrivance. At runtime, the interface doesn’t exist. HL1 simply calls F() within ML1.7 Note, however, that the source code dependency (the inheritance relationship) between ML1 and the interface I points in the opposite direction compared to the flow of control. This is called dependency inversion, and its implications for the software architect are profound. The fact that OO languages provide safe and convenient polymorphism means that any source code dependency, no matter where it is, can be inverted. Now look back at that calling tree in Figure 5.1, and its many source code dependencies. Any of those source code dependencies can be turned around by inserting an interface between them.
With this approach, software architects working in systems written in OO languages have absolute control over the direction of all source code dependencies in the system. They are not constrained to align those dependencies with the flow of control. No matter which module does the calling and which module is called, the software architect can point the source code dependency in either direction. That is power! That is the power that OO provides. That’s what OO is really all about—at least from the architect’s point of view.
What can you do with that power? As an example, you can rearrange the source code dependencies of your system so that the database and the user interface (UI) depend on the business rules (Figure 5.3), rather than the other way around.
This means that the UI and the database can be plugins to the business rules. It means that the source code of the business rules never mentions the UI or the database. As a consequence, the business rules, the UI, and the database can be compiled into three separate components or deployment units (e.g., jar files, DLLs, or Gem files) that have the same dependencies as the source code. The component containing the business rules will not depend on the components containing the UI and database. In turn, the business rules can be deployed independently of the UI and the database. Changes to the UI or the database need not have any effect on the business rules. Those components can be deployed separately and independently. In short, when the source code in a component changes, only that component needs to be redeployed. This is independent deployability. If the modules in your system can be deployed independently, then they can be developed independently by different teams. That’s independent developability.
The SOLID principles tell us how to arrange our functions and data structures into classes, and how those classes should be interconnected. The use of the word “class” does not imply that these principles are applicable only to object-oriented software. A class is simply a coupled grouping of functions and data. Every software system has such groupings, whether they are called classes or not. The SOLID principles apply to those groupings.
The goal of the principles is the creation of mid-level software structures that:
• Tolerate change, • Are easy to understand, and • Are the basis of components that can be used in many software systems.
The term “mid-level” refers to the fact that these principles are applied by programmers working at the module level. They are applied just above the level of the code and help to define the kinds of software structures used within modules and components.
Just as it is possible to create a substantial mess with well-made bricks, so it is also possible to create a system-wide mess with well-designed mid-level components. For this reason, once we have covered the SOLID principles, we will move on to their counterparts in the component world, and then to the principles of high-level architecture.
1- An active corollary to Conway’s law: The best structure for a software system is heavily influenced by the social structure of the organization that uses it so that each software module has one, and only one, reason to change.
2- Of all the SOLID principles, the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) might be the least well understood. That’s likely because it has a particularly inappropriate name. It is too easy for programmers to hear the name and then assume that it means that every module should do just one thing. Make no mistake, there is a principle like that. A function should do one, and only one, thing. We use that principle when we are refactoring large functions into smaller functions; we use it at the lowest levels. But it is not one of the SOLID principles—it is not the SRP.
This class violates the SRP because those three methods are responsible to three very different actors. • The calculatePay() method is specified by the accounting department, which reports to the CFO. • The reportHours() method is specified and used by the human resources department, which reports to the COO. • The save() method is specified by the database administrators (DBAs), who report to the CTO. By putting the source code for these three methods into a single Employee class, the developers have coupled each of these actors to the others. This coupling can cause the actions of the CFO’s team to affect something that the COO’s team depends on. For example, suppose that the calculatePay() function and the reportHours() function share a common algorithm for calculating non-overtime hours. Suppose also that the developers, who are careful not to duplicate code, put that algorithm into a function named regularHours()
Now suppose that the CFO’s team decides that the way non-overtime hours are calculated needs to be tweaked. In contrast, the COO’s team in HR does not want that particular tweak because they use non-overtime hours for a different purpose. A developer is tasked to make the change, and sees the convenient regularHours() function called by the calculatePay() method. Unfortunately, that developer does not notice that the function is also called by the reportHours() function. The developer makes the required change and carefully tests it. The CFO’s team validates that the new function works as desired, and the system is deployed. Of course, the COO’s team doesn’t know that this is happening. The HR personnel continue to use the reports generated by the reportHours() function—but now they contain incorrect numbers. Eventually the problem is discovered, and the COO is livid because the bad data has cost his budget millions of dollars. We’ve all seen things like this happen. These problems occur because we put code that different actors depend on into close proximity. The SRP says to separate the code that different actors depend on.
The Single Responsibility Principle is about functions and classes—but it reappears in a different form at two more levels. At the level of components, it becomes the Common Closure Principle. At the architectural level, it becomes the Axis of Change responsible for the creation of Architectural Boundaries. We’ll be studying all of these ideas in the chapters to come.
This, of course, is the most fundamental reason that we study software architecture. Clearly, if simple extensions to the requirements force massive changes to the software, then the architects of that software system have engaged in a spectacular failure. Most students of software design recognize the OCP as a principle that guides them
in the design of classes and modules. But the principle takes on even greater significance when we consider the level of architectural components.
The OCP is one of the driving forces behind the architecture of systems. The goal is to make the system easy to extend without incurring a high impact of change. This goal is accomplished by partitioning the system into components, and arranging those components into a dependency hierarchy that protects higher-level components from changes in lower-level components.
Square is not a rectangle in behavior so if I made a square : rectangle so every time I use square I should use rectangle which is not the same in behavior.
In mathematics, a Square is a Rectangle. Indeed it is a specialization of a rectangle. The "is a" makes you want to model this with inheritance. However if in code you made Square derive from Rectangle, then a Square should be usable anywhere you expect a Rectangle. This makes for some strange behavior.
Taxi Restful example: And so our architect has had to add a significant and complex mechanism to deal with the fact that the interfaces of the restful services are not all substitutable.
The lesson here is that depending on something that carries baggage that you don’t need can cause you troubles that you didn’t expect.
The Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP) tells us that the most flexible systems are those in which source code dependencies refer only to abstractions, not to concretions.
2- Every change to an abstract interface corresponds to a change to its concrete implementations. Conversely, changes to concrete implementations do not always, or even usually, require changes to the interfaces that they implement. Therefore interfaces are less volatile than implementations. Indeed, good software designers and architects work hard to reduce the volatility of interfaces. They try to find ways to add functionality to implementations without making changes to the interfaces. This is Software Design 101.
If the SOLID principles tell us how to arrange the bricks into walls and rooms, then the component principles tell us how to arrange the rooms into buildings. Large software systems, like large buildings, are built out of smaller components.
1- Components are the units of deployment. They are the smallest entities that can be deployed as part of a system. In Java, they are jar files. In Ruby, they are gem files. In .Net, they are DLLs. In compiled languages, they are aggregations of binary files. In interpreted languages, they are aggregations of source files. In all languages, they are the granule of deployment. Components can be linked together into a single executable. Or they can be aggregated together into a single archive, such as a .war file. Or they can be independently deployed as separate dynamically loaded plugins, such as.jar or .dll or .exe files. Regardless of how they are eventually deployed, well-designed components always retain the ability to be independently deployable and, therefore, independently developable.
These dynamically linked files, which can be plugged together at runtime, are the software components of our architectures. It has taken 50 years, but we have arrived at a place where component plugin architecture can be the casual default as opposed
to the herculean effort it once was.
2- Which classes belong in which components? This is an important decision, and requires guidance from good software engineering principles. Unfortunately, over the years, this decision has been made in an ad hoc manner based almost entirely on context.
The last decade has seen the rise of a menagerie of module management tools, such as Maven, Leiningen, and RVM. These tools have grown in importance because, during that time, a vast number of reusable components and component libraries have been created. We are now living in the age of software reuse—a fulfillment of one of the oldest promises of the object-oriented model. The Reuse/Release Equivalence Principle (REP) is a principle that seems obvious, at least in hindsight. People who want to reuse software components cannot, and will not, do so unless those components are tracked through a release process and are given release numbers. This is not simply because, without release numbers, there would be no way to ensure that all the reused components are compatible with each other. Rather, it also reflects the fact that software developers need to know when new releases are coming, and which changes those new releases will bring. It is not uncommon for developers to be alerted about a new release and decide, based on the changes made in that release, to continue to use the old release instead. Therefore the release process must produce the appropriate notifications and release documentation so that users can make informed decisions about when and whether to integrate the new release. From a software design and architecture point of view, this principle means that the classes and modules that are formed into a component must belong to a cohesive group. The component cannot simply consist of a random hodgepodge of classes and modules; instead, there must be some overarching theme or purpose that those modules all share. Of course, this should be obvious. However, there is another way to look at this issue that is perhaps not quite so obvious. Classes and modules that are grouped together into a component should be releasable together. The fact that they share the same version number and the same release tracking, and are included under the same release documentation, should make sense both to the author and to the users.
1- is the Single Responsibility Principle restated for components. Just as the SRP says that a class should not contain multiples reasons to change, so the Common Closure Principle (CCP) says that a component should not have multiple reasons to change.
2 - For most applications, maintainability is more important than reusability. If the code in an application must change, you would rather that all of the changes occur in one component, rather than being distributed across many components.1 If changes are confined to a single component, then we need to redeploy only the one changed component. Other components that don’t depend on the changed component do not need to be revalidated or redeployed. The CCP prompts us to gather together in one place all the classes that are likely to change for the same reasons. If two classes are so tightly bound, either physically or conceptually, that they always change together, then they belong in the same component. This minimizes the workload related to releasing, revalidating, and redeploying the software.
3- This principle is closely associated with the Open Closed Principle (OCP). Indeed, it is “closure” in the OCP sense of the word that the CCP addresses. The OCP states that classes should be closed for modification but open for extension. Because 100% closure is not attainable, closure must be strategic. We design our classes such that they are closed to the most common kinds of changes that we expect or have
experienced. The CCP amplifies this lesson by gathering together into the same component those classes that are closed to the same types of changes. Thus, when a change in requirements comes along, that change has a good chance of being restricted to a minimal number of components.
1 - The Common Reuse Principle (CRP) is yet another principle that helps us to decide which classes and modules should be placed into a component. It states that classes and modules that tend to be reused together belong in the same component. Classes are seldom reused in isolation. More typically, reusable classes collaborate with other classes that are part of the reusable abstraction. The CRP states that these classes belong together in the same component. In such a component we would expect to see classes that have lots of dependencies on each other. A simple example might be a container class and its associated iterators. These classes are reused together because they are tightly coupled to each other. Thus they ought to be in the same component. But the CRP tells us more than just which classes to put together into a component: It also tells us which classes not to keep together in a component. When one component uses another, a dependency is created between the components. Perhaps the using component uses only one class within the used component—but that still doesn’t weaken the dependency. The using component still depends on the used component.
2- The CRP is the generic version of the ISP. The ISP advises us not to depend on classes that have methods we don’t use. The CRP advises us not to depend on components that have classes we don’t use. All of this advice can be reduced to a single sound bite:
Don’t depend on things you don’t need.
3- In the past, our view of cohesion was much simpler than the REP, CCP, and CRP implied. We once thought that cohesion was simply the attribute that a module performs one, and only one, function. However, the three principles of component cohesion describe a much more complex variety of cohesion. In choosing the classes to group together into components, we must consider the opposing forces involved in reusability and develop-ability. Balancing these forces with the needs of the
application is nontrivial. Moreover, the balance is almost always dynamic. That is, the partitioning that is appropriate today might not be appropriate next year. As a consequence, the composition of the components will likely jitter and evolve with time as the focus of the project changes from develop-ability to reusability.
If the SOLID principles tell us how to arrange the bricks into walls and rooms, then the component principles tell us how to arrange the rooms into buildings. Large software systems, like large buildings, are built out of smaller components.