The document discusses forward modeling of porphyry copper deposit styles using MobileMT technology. It presents 5 case studies of simulated porphyry systems with varying geoelectrical conditions and depths. The forward modeling calculates MobileMT responses for each model, adds noise, and performs inversions to test how well the initial models are recovered. Results show MobileMT can effectively recover subsurface geology across a broad range of resistivities and depths from near surface to over 1 km, demonstrating its potential for porphyry exploration.

1. MobileMT
porphyry forward modeling
from innovations to discoveries
info@expertgeophysics.com www.expertgeophysics.com

2. 2 Definition
Definition: in the case of MobileMT technology, forward modeling is the
mathematical simulation of a geoelectrical model which is used to compute
natural EM field data in the range of 26-20,000 Hz that would be observed given
that model.
Objective of the forward modeling, based on a geologic model and petrophysical
parameters of the model, is investigation a target detectability or the model
recovering capabilities of MobileMT technology in different geoelectrical
conditions and scenarios.
The next steps are implemented into the forward modeling procedure:
- Development a simplified or fully identical geoelectrical model-section.
- Calculation of MobileMT response (apparent conductivity or apparent
resistivities values) for different frequencies along a model.
- Adding gaussian noise into the calculated data (~3%).
- Non-constraint inversion of the calculated+noise field based on the half-space
initial model.
- The MobileMT technology is recognized as potentially effective if the inverted
data is recovering the initial model or detect a given target.

3. Porphyry Copper Deposit Style
“Porphyry copper deposits, the world’s largest source (about 60 percent)
and resource (about 65 percent) of copper and a major source of
molybdenum, gold and silver. “ (David A. John, 2010)
3 Porphyry
DavidA. John, 2010, PorphyryCopper Deposit Model, Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5070–B, USGS.
Emond,A.M., Zhdanov, M.S., and Petersen, E.U.,2006, Electromagnetic modeling based on the rock physics description of the
true complexity of rocks: applications to study of the IP effect in porphyry copper deposits. SEG/NewOrleans Annual Meeting.
ExpandedAbstracts, p.p. 1313-1317.
Hope, M., Andersson S., 2016,The discovery and geophysical response of the AtlántidaCu–Au porphyry deposit,Chile.
Exploration Geophysics, 47, 237–247
Sources:

4. Presented models
• Case 1 - Coastal Cordillera simplified porphyry. 200 Ohm-
m target in resistive environment, 600 m depth.
• Case 2&2a - Atlántida deposit style (Chile). Under
conductive overburden, 0.5-1 km depth.
• Case 3 - American Eagle Porphyry style (Arizona). 1-2 km
depth.
• Case 4 - Dark Canyon Arizona style.
• Case 5&5a - a typical porphyry copper system in the
southwestern U. S. under very conductive overburden.
4 Models

5. 5 Case 1
Case 1
model
Calculated+noise
app conductivity
mS/m
Non-constraint
inversion with
the projected
model
26.6 Hz
13619 Hz
km
m
Coastal Cordillera simplified porphyry

6. 6 Atlántida deposit style (Chile)
Case 2 Atlántida deposit style (Chile) (Hope, M., Andersson, S. 2016)
model
Calculated+noise
app conductivity
mS/m
Non-constraint
inversion

7. 7 Atlántida deposit style (Chile)
Case 2a Atlántida deposit style (Chile) modified
model
Calculated+noise
app conductivity
mS/m
Non-constraint
inversion

8. 8 American Eagle Porphyry style
Case 3 American Eagle Porphyry style (Arizona)
model
Calculated+noise
app conductivity
Non-constraint
inversion
km
mS/m

9. 9 Dark Canyon Arizona style
Case 4 Dark Canyon Arizona style
model
Calculated+noise
app conductivity
Non-constraint
inversion
mS/m

10. 10 porphyry copper system in the southwestern U. S.
Case 5 a typical porphyry copper system in the southwestern U. S.
(Emond et. al. 2006).
mS/m
Non-constraint
inversion
model
Calculated+noise
app conductivity

11. 11 porphyry copper system in the southwestern U. S.
Case 5a a typical porphyry copper system in the southwestern U. S.
modified
model
Calculated+noise
app conductivity
Non-constraint
inversion
mS/m

12. 12 Add a footer
Case 5a a typical porphyry copper system in the southwestern U. S.
modified
Inversion with the
constrained overburden layer
model
Even small a-priory constraints combined with
data inversions improve models recovery.

13. Conclusion
Numerical methods have been used to simulate porphyry ore-
systems models and their reflection in the MobileMT data. The
current forward modeling covers 5+ typical and generalized
porphyry systems models in a broad spectrum of geoelectrical
conditions, from resistive to conductive.
As the theoretical results and practice show, MobileMT airborne
EM system is able to recover subsurface geology effectively in the
broad range of resistivities and depths from near surface to >1 km.
Mobile-MT technology is highly potential in porphyry mineral
exploration, including those porphyry ore-systems that are deeply
located or masked by challenging post-mineral cover.
13 Conclusion

14. Please send us your models or
sections and we will check
MobileMT capabilities in solving
your exploration problems.
info@expertgeophysics.com www.expertgeophysics.com