Mitigating Risk in the Corporate Actions Lifecycle –
Challenges and Opportunities 2014 and Beyond
Kerry White
Managing Director
Brant Rock Advisory Services
Agenda
• The Corporate Actions Lifecycle and Issues We Face
• Factors Impeding Corporate Actions Automation Projects*
• Potential Consequences Of Not Addressing Issues
• Regulatory Impacts
• Conclusions
*Source: “Corporate Actions 2012: A Global Survey of the Corporate Actions Marketplace,“ Swift and CityIQ, 2012
Event
Management
Position
Management
Election
Management
Entitlement
Calculation
Posting
Issues At Hand
• Greater Volume
• Increasingly Complex Transactions
• Diverse Range Of Asset Classes
• Market-specific Nuances
• Lack Of Automation
• Multiple Platforms And Legacy Systems
• Financial Provisions To Protect Against Losses
The Corporate Actions Lifecycle
Factors Impeding Corporate Actions Automation Projects*
14%
11%
3%
3%
2%
10%
29%
9%
19%
Difficulty Building Business Case
Doubts About Attaining STP
Cost of SWIFT Messaging
No Impediments
We are Fully Automated
Lack of Management Buy-In
Competing Internal Priorities
Lack / Inadequacy of Solutions
Limited Return On Investment
*Source: “Corporate Actions 2012: A Global Survey of the Corporate Actions Marketplace,“ Swift and CityIQ, 2012
Potential Consequences Of Not Addressing Issues
• Missed Investment Opportunities
• Losses Due To Incorrect Instructions And Valuations
• Increased Costs And Reduced Profits
• Sub-optimal Investment Decisions Based On Incorrect Data
• Reduced Investment Performance
Regulatory Impacts
• Regulatory change is a global phenomenon
• Firms will be significantly impacted by a rapidly changing environment with multiple
changes to operational processes
• There is no shortage of initiatives:
• LEI
• MIFID2
• EMIR
• AIFMD
• CSD
• T2S
Conclusion
• Adoption Of Common Messaging Standards And Automation Will Streamline Corporate
Actions Processing
• Outcome Will Be Improved Quality And Timeliness Of Data
• There Are Still Challenges To Overcome
• Success Requires Greater Collaboration Among Industry Players
• Genuine Engagement With The Securities Issuer Community Would Also Help
• Increased Profits And Improved Investment Performance Should Accrue
Brant Rock
Advisory Services
Investment Operations and Financial
Services Experts

Mitigating risk in the corporate actions lifecycle –

  • 1.
    Mitigating Risk inthe Corporate Actions Lifecycle – Challenges and Opportunities 2014 and Beyond Kerry White Managing Director Brant Rock Advisory Services
  • 2.
    Agenda • The CorporateActions Lifecycle and Issues We Face • Factors Impeding Corporate Actions Automation Projects* • Potential Consequences Of Not Addressing Issues • Regulatory Impacts • Conclusions *Source: “Corporate Actions 2012: A Global Survey of the Corporate Actions Marketplace,“ Swift and CityIQ, 2012
  • 3.
    Event Management Position Management Election Management Entitlement Calculation Posting Issues At Hand •Greater Volume • Increasingly Complex Transactions • Diverse Range Of Asset Classes • Market-specific Nuances • Lack Of Automation • Multiple Platforms And Legacy Systems • Financial Provisions To Protect Against Losses The Corporate Actions Lifecycle
  • 4.
    Factors Impeding CorporateActions Automation Projects* 14% 11% 3% 3% 2% 10% 29% 9% 19% Difficulty Building Business Case Doubts About Attaining STP Cost of SWIFT Messaging No Impediments We are Fully Automated Lack of Management Buy-In Competing Internal Priorities Lack / Inadequacy of Solutions Limited Return On Investment *Source: “Corporate Actions 2012: A Global Survey of the Corporate Actions Marketplace,“ Swift and CityIQ, 2012
  • 5.
    Potential Consequences OfNot Addressing Issues • Missed Investment Opportunities • Losses Due To Incorrect Instructions And Valuations • Increased Costs And Reduced Profits • Sub-optimal Investment Decisions Based On Incorrect Data • Reduced Investment Performance
  • 6.
    Regulatory Impacts • Regulatorychange is a global phenomenon • Firms will be significantly impacted by a rapidly changing environment with multiple changes to operational processes • There is no shortage of initiatives: • LEI • MIFID2 • EMIR • AIFMD • CSD • T2S
  • 7.
    Conclusion • Adoption OfCommon Messaging Standards And Automation Will Streamline Corporate Actions Processing • Outcome Will Be Improved Quality And Timeliness Of Data • There Are Still Challenges To Overcome • Success Requires Greater Collaboration Among Industry Players • Genuine Engagement With The Securities Issuer Community Would Also Help • Increased Profits And Improved Investment Performance Should Accrue
  • 8.
    Brant Rock Advisory Services InvestmentOperations and Financial Services Experts