Psychology is the study of human behaviour. It seeks to look at the motivational drives within an individual
and offer an explanation to the behaviour that is demonstrated
The Russian Approach to Information WarfareJeffrey Malone
This is a modified version of a lecture from the unit that I teach (ZEIT 8115 - Information Operations) in the Masters of System Engineering Course at the School of Engineering and IT, Australian Defence Force Academy (UNSW). I have posted this as - arising out of unfolding events in Ukraine - this topic is of broader interest.
The Russian Approach to Information WarfareJeffrey Malone
This is a modified version of a lecture from the unit that I teach (ZEIT 8115 - Information Operations) in the Masters of System Engineering Course at the School of Engineering and IT, Australian Defence Force Academy (UNSW). I have posted this as - arising out of unfolding events in Ukraine - this topic is of broader interest.
Concept, Functions and Limitations of Psychological Warijtsrd
Psychological warfare PSYWAR , or the basic aspects of modern psychological operations PsyOp , have been known by many other names or terms, including Military Information Support Operations MISO , Psy Ops, political warfare, Hearts and Minds , and propaganda. The term is used to denote any action which is practiced mainly by psychological methods with the aim of evoking a planned psychological reaction in other people . Various techniques are used, and are aimed at influencing a target audiences value system, belief system, emotions, motives, reasoning, or behavior. It is used to induce confessions or reinforce attitudes and behaviors favorable to the originators objectives, and are sometimes combined with black operations or false flag tactics. It is also used to destroy the morale of enemies through tactics that aim to depress troops psychological states. Target audiences can be governments, organizations, groups, and individuals, and is not just limited to soldiers. Civilians of foreign territories can also be targeted by technology and media so as to cause an effect in the government of their country. There is evidence of psychological warfare throughout written history. In modern times, psychological warfare efforts have been used extensively. Mass communication allows for direct communication with an enemy populace, and therefore has been used in many efforts. Social media channels and the internet allow for campaigns of disinformation and misinformation performed by agents anywhere in the world. Dr. Kanchan Mishra "Concept, Functions and Limitations of Psychological War" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-6 | Issue-2 , February 2022, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd49313.pdf Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/other-scientific-research-area/other/49313/concept-functions-and-limitations-of-psychological-war/dr-kanchan-mishra
Enhanced Warfighters: Risk, Ethics, and PolicyIlya Klabukov
В отчете Greenwall Foundation "Усовершенствованные Военнослужащие: Риски, Этика и Принципы" раскрыты основные морально-этические ограничения на пути совершенствования интеллектуальных и физических возможностей военнослужащих, а также обсуждаются возможные пути их преодоления.
Mehlman M., Lin P., Abney K. Enhanced Warfighters: Risk, Ethics, and Policy //Case Legal Studies Research Paper. – 2013. – №. 2013-2.
Article - http://www.campusreview.com.au/pages/section/article.php?s=Topics&ss=International&idArticle=5843
The Pentagon, the university and
the video game
21 Apr 08 by Toby Miller | Print this story | Send this story to a friend
Toby Miller wonders whether the line between a university ICT research centre and its role in training
soldiers, is overly blurred.
Most of us probably think of electronic games in one of two ways. Either they are the newest means of rotting
the brains of the young, or they are exciting new educational forms that will improve learning. In terms of
the role that research universities should play in them, we perhaps imagine that scholars will evaluate the
potential harm caused in real life by players of violent first-person shooters alongside the potential benefit of
conflict-resolution gaming or peaceful virtual worlds. We might even think about those wacky folks over in
creative industries making their own games as part of the entrepreneurial spirit of small business that is
supposedly enabled by their work in universities.
After all, the grand bifurcation that put science at the physical and symbolic top of the campus and the arts
at the bottom, with no interaction, seems to be over. Computing applications to narrative and art, and vice
versa, are well known to professors from computer science to dance. As author Thomas Pynchon put it, “all
the cats are jumping out of the bag and even beginning to mingle”. Faculty at opposite ends of the university
write the same codes, analyse the same narratives, go to the same parties, take the same drugs, and sleep
with the same people. But here in the US, there is a much more powerful link between electronic games and
universities. It’s called the military.
In 1996, the National Academy of Sciences held a workshop for academia, Hollywood, and the Pentagon on
simulation and games. The next year, the National Research Council announced a collaborative research
agenda in popular culture and militarism. It convened meetings to streamline such cooperation, from special
effects to training simulations, from immersive technologies to simulated networks. Since that time, untold
numbers of academic journals and institutes on games have become closely tied to the Pentagon. They
generate research designed to test and augment the recruiting and training potential of games to ideologise,
hire, and instruct the population. The Centre for Computational Analysis of Social and Organisational Systems
at Carnegie-Mellon University in Pittsburgh promulgates studies underwritten by the Office of Naval Research
and the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency. That agency refers to Orlando as Team Orlando
because the city houses Disney’s R&D “imagineers”, the University of Central Florida’s Institute for Simulation
and Training; Lockheed Martin, the nation’s biggest military contractor; and the Pentagon’s Institute for
Simulation and Training.
In Los Angeles, in Marina del Rey (the next subu ...
Article - http://www.campusreview.com.au/pages/section/article.php?s=Topics&ss=International&idArticle=5843
The Pentagon, the university and
the video game
21 Apr 08 by Toby Miller | Print this story | Send this story to a friend
Toby Miller wonders whether the line between a university ICT research centre and its role in training
soldiers, is overly blurred.
Most of us probably think of electronic games in one of two ways. Either they are the newest means of rotting
the brains of the young, or they are exciting new educational forms that will improve learning. In terms of
the role that research universities should play in them, we perhaps imagine that scholars will evaluate the
potential harm caused in real life by players of violent first-person shooters alongside the potential benefit of
conflict-resolution gaming or peaceful virtual worlds. We might even think about those wacky folks over in
creative industries making their own games as part of the entrepreneurial spirit of small business that is
supposedly enabled by their work in universities.
After all, the grand bifurcation that put science at the physical and symbolic top of the campus and the arts
at the bottom, with no interaction, seems to be over. Computing applications to narrative and art, and vice
versa, are well known to professors from computer science to dance. As author Thomas Pynchon put it, “all
the cats are jumping out of the bag and even beginning to mingle”. Faculty at opposite ends of the university
write the same codes, analyse the same narratives, go to the same parties, take the same drugs, and sleep
with the same people. But here in the US, there is a much more powerful link between electronic games and
universities. It’s called the military.
In 1996, the National Academy of Sciences held a workshop for academia, Hollywood, and the Pentagon on
simulation and games. The next year, the National Research Council announced a collaborative research
agenda in popular culture and militarism. It convened meetings to streamline such cooperation, from special
effects to training simulations, from immersive technologies to simulated networks. Since that time, untold
numbers of academic journals and institutes on games have become closely tied to the Pentagon. They
generate research designed to test and augment the recruiting and training potential of games to ideologise,
hire, and instruct the population. The Centre for Computational Analysis of Social and Organisational Systems
at Carnegie-Mellon University in Pittsburgh promulgates studies underwritten by the Office of Naval Research
and the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency. That agency refers to Orlando as Team Orlando
because the city houses Disney’s R&D “imagineers”, the University of Central Florida’s Institute for Simulation
and Training; Lockheed Martin, the nation’s biggest military contractor; and the Pentagon’s Institute for
Simulation and Training.
In Los Angeles, in Marina del Rey (the next subu.
Group Epistemology and Irregular Warfare (the chickens come home to roost)Peter Ludlow
Most work in epistemology (the theory of knowledge) focusses on how individuals can acquire knowledge and eliminate error. But recently attention has been turned to how groups acquire knowledge and eliminate error. In this talk I take up the question of how groups can maximize knowledge acquisition in hostile environments -- for example, when they are the targets of irregular warfare.
Individual Project #1You are an intelligence analyst for the Feder.docxwiddowsonerica
Individual Project #1
You are an intelligence analyst for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) assigned to the Counterintelligence (CI) Division. The FBI’s CI Division has been involved in the field of CI for decades. During this period, the CI division has conducted thousands of CI investigations, many of which have had a major impact on the history and national security of the United States. It is important as an intelligence analyst with the CI Division to have a clear understanding of these cases and to learn from both its past CI successes and failures.
You have been asked by your supervisor to research major espionage cases to produce an intelligence assessment from a historical perspective that will help to recognize anomalies that might indicate the presence of espionage and assist in the neutralization process in the future.
Assignment Guidelines
For this assignment, you must write a counterintelligence case study, approximately 750–1,000 words in length, on one of the following major espionage cases:
Robert P. Hanssen
Aldrich H. Ames
Ana B. Montes
John A. Walker
For your selected case study, you will address the following in detail:
Who
What was this person's personal background?
What was this person's professional background?
Were there any accomplices? If so, explain.
Which foreign powers were involved?
When
When did the espionage begin?
For how long did the espionage continue?
When was the spy apprehended?
Where
Where did the espionage take place?
Consider military intelligence, U.S. soil, agency/rank, and so on.
What
What information was being leaked?
For what purposes could that information have been used?
How
How was the information taken from U.S. facilities or databases? Explain in detail.
How was the information delivered to the foreign power or powers? Explain.
How was the spy apprehended? Explain.
Why
What was the motivation for the espionage? Explain.
Answer the following questions as well:
What lessons were learned after the selected case concluded?
What impact did this particular case have on U.S. policies and operational standards?
Consider successful and unsuccessful investigative techniques, implications, and recommendations.
Compile your responses in your final case study, and submit the file to your instructor.
All sources must be referenced using APA style.
Individual Project #2
You are an intelligence analyst for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) assigned to the Counterintelligence (CI) Division. You have been embedded on the Kartesia Country Team and are responsible for producing a counterintelligence assessment to forecast the potential counterintelligence threat posed by Kartesia.
For many years, Kartesia and the United States have been political and economic adversaries. Kartesia, which is led by an oppressive dictatorship, has long feared that the United States will initiate military action against it to topple the regime and institute a democratic form of government. Although K.
Question 1 Which of the following is currently organized outsi.docxmakdul
Question 1
Which of the following is currently organized outside the US Department of Defense?
Defense Intelligence Agency
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
National Security Agency
United States Coast Guard
Question 2
Which of the following did the US Supreme Court rule regarding legal rights and detainees held by the US government as “enemy combatants”?
Detainees had the right to a trial in a federal court
Detainees had the right to file a write of habeas corpus
Foreign governments had the right to challenge their detention
The US government had the right to withhold classified evidence
Question 3
Which of the following are included in Executive Order 13491 issued by President Obama shortly after taking office?
All US Department of Defense secret detention facilities must be closed
Interrogations must conform to the US Army Field Manual for Interrogations
The Central Intelligence Agency must cease all renditions of detainees
The International Committee of the Red Cross had access to ill detainees
Question 4
Which of the following is true about the two main sides of the public debate in the US regarding torture?
Both sides agreed that coercion was immoral, but they disagreed as to whether it was torture.
Both sides agreed that coercive techniques had led to unique intelligence, but they disagreed as to whether it was worth it.
Both sides agreed that torture and coercion was the same thing, but they disagreed as to whether it was legal.
Both sides agreed that torture protected our national security, but disagreed as to whether it damaged our foreign alliances.
Question 5
Which of the following is one of the reasons why Congress has resisted reforming its approach toward the US Intelligence Community?
Congress does not wish to implement new oversight measures on the Intelligence Community.
Congress does not wish to increase the bureaucracy to which the Intelligence Community is subject.
Congress wishes to ensure the Intelligence Community responds to the interests of policy makers.
Congress wishes to refrain from over influencing the Intelligence Community.
Question 6
At which point do terrorists enter the triangle of communication?
Government
Media
Politicians
Public
Question 7
Which of the following is an argument against the idea that publicity is a universal terrorist goal?
All terrorists already have their own publicity mechanisms
Modern technology has greatly increased the costs of publicity
Modern terrorists are more motivated to commit terror than gain publicity
Oppressive governments are the most susceptible to publicity
Question 8
Which of the following is a problem that occurs when the media treats the spokespersons for terrorist organizations the same as the spokespersons for state security organizations?
It decreases the legitimacy of the state government
It increases the terrorist organization’s respectability
It oversimplifies compl ...
This was a group project for my Army Combined Arms Service Staff School (CAS3) in 2004. We were asked to conduct research on Terrorism and develop proposals. Warning, graphic photos!
This palette is amazing! You are able to get the dramatic neutral looks as well as everyday looks. I have both the first naked palette and this one and I must say its hard to choose which one to use when you have such an amazing collection.
Concept, Functions and Limitations of Psychological Warijtsrd
Psychological warfare PSYWAR , or the basic aspects of modern psychological operations PsyOp , have been known by many other names or terms, including Military Information Support Operations MISO , Psy Ops, political warfare, Hearts and Minds , and propaganda. The term is used to denote any action which is practiced mainly by psychological methods with the aim of evoking a planned psychological reaction in other people . Various techniques are used, and are aimed at influencing a target audiences value system, belief system, emotions, motives, reasoning, or behavior. It is used to induce confessions or reinforce attitudes and behaviors favorable to the originators objectives, and are sometimes combined with black operations or false flag tactics. It is also used to destroy the morale of enemies through tactics that aim to depress troops psychological states. Target audiences can be governments, organizations, groups, and individuals, and is not just limited to soldiers. Civilians of foreign territories can also be targeted by technology and media so as to cause an effect in the government of their country. There is evidence of psychological warfare throughout written history. In modern times, psychological warfare efforts have been used extensively. Mass communication allows for direct communication with an enemy populace, and therefore has been used in many efforts. Social media channels and the internet allow for campaigns of disinformation and misinformation performed by agents anywhere in the world. Dr. Kanchan Mishra "Concept, Functions and Limitations of Psychological War" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-6 | Issue-2 , February 2022, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd49313.pdf Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/other-scientific-research-area/other/49313/concept-functions-and-limitations-of-psychological-war/dr-kanchan-mishra
Enhanced Warfighters: Risk, Ethics, and PolicyIlya Klabukov
В отчете Greenwall Foundation "Усовершенствованные Военнослужащие: Риски, Этика и Принципы" раскрыты основные морально-этические ограничения на пути совершенствования интеллектуальных и физических возможностей военнослужащих, а также обсуждаются возможные пути их преодоления.
Mehlman M., Lin P., Abney K. Enhanced Warfighters: Risk, Ethics, and Policy //Case Legal Studies Research Paper. – 2013. – №. 2013-2.
Article - http://www.campusreview.com.au/pages/section/article.php?s=Topics&ss=International&idArticle=5843
The Pentagon, the university and
the video game
21 Apr 08 by Toby Miller | Print this story | Send this story to a friend
Toby Miller wonders whether the line between a university ICT research centre and its role in training
soldiers, is overly blurred.
Most of us probably think of electronic games in one of two ways. Either they are the newest means of rotting
the brains of the young, or they are exciting new educational forms that will improve learning. In terms of
the role that research universities should play in them, we perhaps imagine that scholars will evaluate the
potential harm caused in real life by players of violent first-person shooters alongside the potential benefit of
conflict-resolution gaming or peaceful virtual worlds. We might even think about those wacky folks over in
creative industries making their own games as part of the entrepreneurial spirit of small business that is
supposedly enabled by their work in universities.
After all, the grand bifurcation that put science at the physical and symbolic top of the campus and the arts
at the bottom, with no interaction, seems to be over. Computing applications to narrative and art, and vice
versa, are well known to professors from computer science to dance. As author Thomas Pynchon put it, “all
the cats are jumping out of the bag and even beginning to mingle”. Faculty at opposite ends of the university
write the same codes, analyse the same narratives, go to the same parties, take the same drugs, and sleep
with the same people. But here in the US, there is a much more powerful link between electronic games and
universities. It’s called the military.
In 1996, the National Academy of Sciences held a workshop for academia, Hollywood, and the Pentagon on
simulation and games. The next year, the National Research Council announced a collaborative research
agenda in popular culture and militarism. It convened meetings to streamline such cooperation, from special
effects to training simulations, from immersive technologies to simulated networks. Since that time, untold
numbers of academic journals and institutes on games have become closely tied to the Pentagon. They
generate research designed to test and augment the recruiting and training potential of games to ideologise,
hire, and instruct the population. The Centre for Computational Analysis of Social and Organisational Systems
at Carnegie-Mellon University in Pittsburgh promulgates studies underwritten by the Office of Naval Research
and the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency. That agency refers to Orlando as Team Orlando
because the city houses Disney’s R&D “imagineers”, the University of Central Florida’s Institute for Simulation
and Training; Lockheed Martin, the nation’s biggest military contractor; and the Pentagon’s Institute for
Simulation and Training.
In Los Angeles, in Marina del Rey (the next subu ...
Article - http://www.campusreview.com.au/pages/section/article.php?s=Topics&ss=International&idArticle=5843
The Pentagon, the university and
the video game
21 Apr 08 by Toby Miller | Print this story | Send this story to a friend
Toby Miller wonders whether the line between a university ICT research centre and its role in training
soldiers, is overly blurred.
Most of us probably think of electronic games in one of two ways. Either they are the newest means of rotting
the brains of the young, or they are exciting new educational forms that will improve learning. In terms of
the role that research universities should play in them, we perhaps imagine that scholars will evaluate the
potential harm caused in real life by players of violent first-person shooters alongside the potential benefit of
conflict-resolution gaming or peaceful virtual worlds. We might even think about those wacky folks over in
creative industries making their own games as part of the entrepreneurial spirit of small business that is
supposedly enabled by their work in universities.
After all, the grand bifurcation that put science at the physical and symbolic top of the campus and the arts
at the bottom, with no interaction, seems to be over. Computing applications to narrative and art, and vice
versa, are well known to professors from computer science to dance. As author Thomas Pynchon put it, “all
the cats are jumping out of the bag and even beginning to mingle”. Faculty at opposite ends of the university
write the same codes, analyse the same narratives, go to the same parties, take the same drugs, and sleep
with the same people. But here in the US, there is a much more powerful link between electronic games and
universities. It’s called the military.
In 1996, the National Academy of Sciences held a workshop for academia, Hollywood, and the Pentagon on
simulation and games. The next year, the National Research Council announced a collaborative research
agenda in popular culture and militarism. It convened meetings to streamline such cooperation, from special
effects to training simulations, from immersive technologies to simulated networks. Since that time, untold
numbers of academic journals and institutes on games have become closely tied to the Pentagon. They
generate research designed to test and augment the recruiting and training potential of games to ideologise,
hire, and instruct the population. The Centre for Computational Analysis of Social and Organisational Systems
at Carnegie-Mellon University in Pittsburgh promulgates studies underwritten by the Office of Naval Research
and the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency. That agency refers to Orlando as Team Orlando
because the city houses Disney’s R&D “imagineers”, the University of Central Florida’s Institute for Simulation
and Training; Lockheed Martin, the nation’s biggest military contractor; and the Pentagon’s Institute for
Simulation and Training.
In Los Angeles, in Marina del Rey (the next subu.
Group Epistemology and Irregular Warfare (the chickens come home to roost)Peter Ludlow
Most work in epistemology (the theory of knowledge) focusses on how individuals can acquire knowledge and eliminate error. But recently attention has been turned to how groups acquire knowledge and eliminate error. In this talk I take up the question of how groups can maximize knowledge acquisition in hostile environments -- for example, when they are the targets of irregular warfare.
Individual Project #1You are an intelligence analyst for the Feder.docxwiddowsonerica
Individual Project #1
You are an intelligence analyst for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) assigned to the Counterintelligence (CI) Division. The FBI’s CI Division has been involved in the field of CI for decades. During this period, the CI division has conducted thousands of CI investigations, many of which have had a major impact on the history and national security of the United States. It is important as an intelligence analyst with the CI Division to have a clear understanding of these cases and to learn from both its past CI successes and failures.
You have been asked by your supervisor to research major espionage cases to produce an intelligence assessment from a historical perspective that will help to recognize anomalies that might indicate the presence of espionage and assist in the neutralization process in the future.
Assignment Guidelines
For this assignment, you must write a counterintelligence case study, approximately 750–1,000 words in length, on one of the following major espionage cases:
Robert P. Hanssen
Aldrich H. Ames
Ana B. Montes
John A. Walker
For your selected case study, you will address the following in detail:
Who
What was this person's personal background?
What was this person's professional background?
Were there any accomplices? If so, explain.
Which foreign powers were involved?
When
When did the espionage begin?
For how long did the espionage continue?
When was the spy apprehended?
Where
Where did the espionage take place?
Consider military intelligence, U.S. soil, agency/rank, and so on.
What
What information was being leaked?
For what purposes could that information have been used?
How
How was the information taken from U.S. facilities or databases? Explain in detail.
How was the information delivered to the foreign power or powers? Explain.
How was the spy apprehended? Explain.
Why
What was the motivation for the espionage? Explain.
Answer the following questions as well:
What lessons were learned after the selected case concluded?
What impact did this particular case have on U.S. policies and operational standards?
Consider successful and unsuccessful investigative techniques, implications, and recommendations.
Compile your responses in your final case study, and submit the file to your instructor.
All sources must be referenced using APA style.
Individual Project #2
You are an intelligence analyst for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) assigned to the Counterintelligence (CI) Division. You have been embedded on the Kartesia Country Team and are responsible for producing a counterintelligence assessment to forecast the potential counterintelligence threat posed by Kartesia.
For many years, Kartesia and the United States have been political and economic adversaries. Kartesia, which is led by an oppressive dictatorship, has long feared that the United States will initiate military action against it to topple the regime and institute a democratic form of government. Although K.
Question 1 Which of the following is currently organized outsi.docxmakdul
Question 1
Which of the following is currently organized outside the US Department of Defense?
Defense Intelligence Agency
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
National Security Agency
United States Coast Guard
Question 2
Which of the following did the US Supreme Court rule regarding legal rights and detainees held by the US government as “enemy combatants”?
Detainees had the right to a trial in a federal court
Detainees had the right to file a write of habeas corpus
Foreign governments had the right to challenge their detention
The US government had the right to withhold classified evidence
Question 3
Which of the following are included in Executive Order 13491 issued by President Obama shortly after taking office?
All US Department of Defense secret detention facilities must be closed
Interrogations must conform to the US Army Field Manual for Interrogations
The Central Intelligence Agency must cease all renditions of detainees
The International Committee of the Red Cross had access to ill detainees
Question 4
Which of the following is true about the two main sides of the public debate in the US regarding torture?
Both sides agreed that coercion was immoral, but they disagreed as to whether it was torture.
Both sides agreed that coercive techniques had led to unique intelligence, but they disagreed as to whether it was worth it.
Both sides agreed that torture and coercion was the same thing, but they disagreed as to whether it was legal.
Both sides agreed that torture protected our national security, but disagreed as to whether it damaged our foreign alliances.
Question 5
Which of the following is one of the reasons why Congress has resisted reforming its approach toward the US Intelligence Community?
Congress does not wish to implement new oversight measures on the Intelligence Community.
Congress does not wish to increase the bureaucracy to which the Intelligence Community is subject.
Congress wishes to ensure the Intelligence Community responds to the interests of policy makers.
Congress wishes to refrain from over influencing the Intelligence Community.
Question 6
At which point do terrorists enter the triangle of communication?
Government
Media
Politicians
Public
Question 7
Which of the following is an argument against the idea that publicity is a universal terrorist goal?
All terrorists already have their own publicity mechanisms
Modern technology has greatly increased the costs of publicity
Modern terrorists are more motivated to commit terror than gain publicity
Oppressive governments are the most susceptible to publicity
Question 8
Which of the following is a problem that occurs when the media treats the spokespersons for terrorist organizations the same as the spokespersons for state security organizations?
It decreases the legitimacy of the state government
It increases the terrorist organization’s respectability
It oversimplifies compl ...
This was a group project for my Army Combined Arms Service Staff School (CAS3) in 2004. We were asked to conduct research on Terrorism and develop proposals. Warning, graphic photos!
Similar to Military Psychology The Latest Developments (20)
This palette is amazing! You are able to get the dramatic neutral looks as well as everyday looks. I have both the first naked palette and this one and I must say its hard to choose which one to use when you have such an amazing collection.
Psychology is the study of human behaviour. It seeks to look at the motivational drives within an individual
and offer an explanation to the behaviour that is demonstrated
Psychology is the study of human behaviour. It seeks to look at the motivational drives within an individual
and offer an explanation to the behaviour that is demonstrated
Psychology is the study of human behaviour. It seeks to look at the motivational drives within an individual
and offer an explanation to the behaviour that is demonstrated
Psychology is the study of human behaviour. It seeks to look at the motivational drives within an individual
and offer an explanation to the behaviour that is demonstrated
Psychology is the study of human behaviour. It seeks to look at the motivational drives within an individual
and offer an explanation to the behaviour that is demonstrated
Psychology is the study of human behaviour. It seeks to look at the motivational drives within an individual
and offer an explanation to the behaviour that is demonstrated
Psychology is the study of human behaviour. It seeks to look at the motivational drives within an individual
and offer an explanation to the behaviour that is demonstrated
Psychology is the study of human behaviour. It seeks to look at the motivational drives within an individual
and offer an explanation to the behaviour that is demonstrated
Psychology is the study of human behaviour. It seeks to look at the motivational drives within an individual
and offer an explanation to the behaviour that is demonstrated
Psychology is the study of human behaviour. It seeks to look at the motivational drives within an individual
and offer an explanation to the behaviour that is demonstrated
Psychology is the study of human behaviour. It seeks to look at the motivational drives within an individual
and offer an explanation to the behaviour that is demonstrated
Psychology is the study of human behaviour. It seeks to look at the motivational drives within an individual
and offer an explanation to the behaviour that is demonstrated
Psychology is the study of human behaviour. It seeks to look at the motivational drives within an individual
and offer an explanation to the behaviour that is demonstrated
Narcissistic Personality Disorder Prevalence and ComorbidityKristina Angelova
Psychology is the study of human behaviour. It seeks to look at the motivational drives within an individual
and offer an explanation to the behaviour that is demonstrated
Psychology is the study of human behaviour. It seeks to look at the motivational drives within an individual
and offer an explanation to the behaviour that is demonstrated
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
role of women and girls in various terror groupssadiakorobi2
Women have three distinct types of involvement: direct involvement in terrorist acts; enabling of others to commit such acts; and facilitating the disengagement of others from violent or extremist groups.
‘वोटर्स विल मस्ट प्रीवेल’ (मतदाताओं को जीतना होगा) अभियान द्वारा जारी हेल्पलाइन नंबर, 4 जून को सुबह 7 बजे से दोपहर 12 बजे तक मतगणना प्रक्रिया में कहीं भी किसी भी तरह के उल्लंघन की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए खुला रहेगा।
In a May 9, 2024 paper, Juri Opitz from the University of Zurich, along with Shira Wein and Nathan Schneider form Georgetown University, discussed the importance of linguistic expertise in natural language processing (NLP) in an era dominated by large language models (LLMs).
The authors explained that while machine translation (MT) previously relied heavily on linguists, the landscape has shifted. “Linguistics is no longer front and center in the way we build NLP systems,” they said. With the emergence of LLMs, which can generate fluent text without the need for specialized modules to handle grammar or semantic coherence, the need for linguistic expertise in NLP is being questioned.
हम आग्रह करते हैं कि जो भी सत्ता में आए, वह संविधान का पालन करे, उसकी रक्षा करे और उसे बनाए रखे।" प्रस्ताव में कुल तीन प्रमुख हस्तक्षेप और उनके तंत्र भी प्रस्तुत किए गए। पहला हस्तक्षेप स्वतंत्र मीडिया को प्रोत्साहित करके, वास्तविकता पर आधारित काउंटर नैरेटिव का निर्माण करके और सत्तारूढ़ सरकार द्वारा नियोजित मनोवैज्ञानिक हेरफेर की रणनीति का मुकाबला करके लोगों द्वारा निर्धारित कथा को बनाए रखना और उस पर कार्यकरना था।
31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
1. Military Psychology The Latest Developments
If you want to learn more, you may consider to visit:
http://evolutionary-psychology.net/
Aside from the billions of dollars spent on military hardware like planes, submarines, aircraft carriers and
state of the art missiles, militaries and armed forces of the United States of America has also relied on
military psychology to further boost its war time efforts to finish of battles and gather intelligence.
This form of war strategy is very effective and applied to captured prisoners of war but the sad thing is that
military psychological techniques and strategies usually is accompanied by torture. It is a part of the three
elements needed to break down a POW’s conviction, Psychology, Torture and Interrogation.
This has been very much in use in the Vietnam war. Where in captured communist rebels would be subjected
to psychological strategies to find out the location of their bunkers and camps. Unfortunately, the rebels had
the same idea. Captured American soldiers would tell horrid tales of torture and humiliation in the hands of
their interrogators psychologically breaking them down bit by bit.
As weapons have been technologically developed, using laser targeting, satellite guidance and unmanned
surveillance systems, military psychology has also developed their methods and strategies. As each country
has made their armed forces stronger, so much more so for the United States Army.
United States is on one of its biggest wars right now, the “War on Terrorism.” One of the defenses used by
the American armed forces and security is military psychology. Advances in different forms have been
developed and utilized to catch and prevent terrorism to happen again.
The September 11 attack alone can be considered as a psychological strategy done by terrorists instilling
fear and panic in the hearts of American people. These are propagandas used to weaken and divide the
Americans and on a psychological plane, it has somewhat made its point. Not only did it kill thousands of
Americans it has also made them think about their vulnerability.
US securities have done their own homework. This includes profiling the enemy. Many psychological studies
have been done on face recognition. Once perfected, this is a big help in surveillance and prevention of
infiltration. This researches has drawn heavily from psychological knowledge of the military psychology track.
Military psychology has also developed various techniques and strategies in how to muddle a persons mind
during interrogation making them confused and disoriented. This includes placing bags over the heads of the
interrogated. They are made to raise their hands and spread their legs for a long period of time. Other
techniques used lately would be, noise bombardment, sleep deprivation, food deprivation and being
brainwashed and mentally tortured.
Another latest development in military psychology is their statistical prediction of behavior. Given many
names already, this development probe through huge amounts of data on a suspected person in order to
‘predict possible terrorists by following a lifetime of seemingly innocent movements through electronic paper
trails, for example; academic transcripts, prescription drugs, telephone calls, driving licenses, airline tickets,
mortgage payments, parking permits, banking accounts and records, emails, website visits and credit card
purchases. Through this, the military would like to prove if a person is a threat to national security. Many feel
though that this is an invasion of their privacy.
Military psychology is an important aspect of the military. It can help end wars faster and with less loss of life
on both sides. As more and more technological and psychological advances has been develop, this may
result to more peace and tranquility.
Military psycholo9gy though has been very controversial ever since it was used. But it is not the United States
alone that uses military psychology. Armed forces from all over the world has seen its potential and has made
studies and researches on how to make it more effective.
While we may never really know everything that is being done in camps. The latest developments in military
psychology are surely being used to gain a foothold over the enemies. These are strategies not shown to
everybody to have the advantage. The race for military supremacy through technology is not just about
having the biggest guns and the best planes and tanks, its also about using mans greatest weapon, the mind.
And sometimes, the mind can be used against itself.
Page 1
2. Military Psychology The Latest Developments
If you want to learn more, you may consider to visit:
http://evolutionary-psychology.net/
Page 2