MEDIA PIRACY
 IT’S ALL A CRIME

      Creators:
     Dajane Martin
       Paige Boose
       Tori Slater
     Brittany Davies
DAJANE MARTIN
THE QUESTION ABOUT
                    PIRACY

 What negative affects has media piracy had on the American society?

- One of the things I did to narrow the question I came up with was to keep my
question geared towards a specific area which is America. Also instead of just
saying effects, because there could be negative and positive affects I just focused
on the negative part of piracy. My argument is basically stating that even though
many people
MY POINT

 I think the most important point/argument that I am trying to
make is that media piracy is not something that only affects the
criminals who do it. It also affects the people who don’t do because
the prices of the media rises and someone that they know may also
get them in trouble. So media piracy affects the criminals and the
producers but also innocent people. This is a whole society that media
piracy is affecting.
THE SUPPORT BOOKS

 Peer to Peer and the music industry: The criminalization of
sharing. Cite: David, Matthew. Peer to Peer and the Music Industry:
The Criminalization of Sharing. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2010. Print.

 Pop song piracy: Disobedient music distribution since 1929. Cite:
Kernfeld, Barry Dean. Pop Song Piracy: Disobedient Music
Distribution Since 1929. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.
Print
THE SUPPORT ARTICLES

 Scholarly Article: Jailhouse Frocks: Locating the Public Interest in
Policing Counterfeit Luxury Fashion Goods British Journal of
Criminology November 1, 2010 50: 1094-1116

 Popular Article: Music piracy stunting digital music revenue:
industry exec. Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights
reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or
redistributed.
THE SUPPORT WEBSITE


 Galileo. Georgia Library Learning Online. 15 september 1995
<http://www.galileo.usg.edu/scholar/westga/subjects/?Welcome>
LETS EVALUATE

 The sources I used are all credible because they are either from
reliable sources like Galileo which is a online Georgia library for GA
or are all written by authors that have good rating or that are
professors, researchers, or are in other form of a high profession.
PAIGE BOOSE
RESEARCH QUESTION

 Are the consequences too heavy when one commits the act of piracy on
media?

 I chose this research question after my group and I talked over multiple
topics we could pull from our over all topic of Piracy and I was interested in
learning about the consequences that come with being caught stealing media.

 I narrowed my question down from asking about consequences in general
to dealing with only consequences being too heavy while also making my
question arguable at the same time.
ARGUMENT?

 My argument is that consequences seem to vary from being too light
or too heavy. I think that consequences are too heavy at times when
stealing media. I say this because there are many websites circulating
through the internet and many people think that since there is a website
for piracy than it must be okay. We forget that stealing media is just like
stealing a purse from a department store. It is illegal and many will be
caught. I think that more advertisements should be presented so this way
we will be more educated with the act of piracy.
RESEARCH SOURCES
 From my five sources I think that three of them will be very sufficient towards
my research. My first source is a book called, Peer to Peer and the Music Industry:
The Criminalization of Sharing. Second source is an article called, Purchase or
Pirate: A Model of Consumer Intellectual Property Theft. Third source is my
second article choice called, Digital Piracy: Causes, Consequences and Strategic
Responses.

 All of these sources will back up my position because they all have to deal with
consequences and why one should purchase media and not pirate.

 Information is also given to what factors lead to someone committing the act of
piracy.
EVALUATION

 My sources are credible after I looked over who was the author or
authors and many were college professors and even sources were
cited within my sources.

 I knew my sources would be relevant to my research because they
all have information focusing mainly on what leads to
piracy, consequences and even laws that deal with piracy and how they
are used when someone has been caught.
TORI SLATER
W H AT A R E T H E E F F E C T S O F P I R AC Y
   ON ARTIST AND THEIR LABEL?

I narrowed my question by focusing on artist and
their label, and did some presearching.
MY ARGUMENT

 Piracy on music has major effects on artist and their label?
THE RESOURCES

 The book I used gets more in depth with music piracy

 The scholarly article is helpful because its written by experts

 The website helps me because its unbiased and relevant
BRITTANY DAVIES
MY RESEARCH QUESTION
                    Should music piracy be legalized?
   I came up with my question by first doing some pre searching. I search
    in Google key terms like “music piracy problems” to get a general idea
    about my topic.
   The first variation of my question was: what are the negative effects of
    piracy. This question was way too broad and had no clear room for
    opinions.
   I did some more pre searching and saw an article about legalizing music
    piracy
   I then formulated the question: Should music piracy be legalized?
   This is a good question because it is not too broad nor too narrow
   There are two opposing sides for an argument
   There is more than enough information which I can find based on this
    question
POSITION/ THESIS

I believe that music piracy should not be legalized
because it promotes stealing in such a free manner.
Piracy in the music industry has lead to problems
within the economy as well as money loss for artist.
Stealing is still a crime and those guilty should be
held accountable.
ARGUMENT
 Money loss for artist

 Promotes stealing

 Negative effects on the economy

 I answered my research question by finding evidence to
back up my thesis statement. Within my sources I found
information about how piracy within the music industry has
had negative effects on the US economy
YOUR RESEARCH
 Article: It won’t happen to me: An assessment of optimism bias in music
piracy, written by Ankur Nandedkar and Vishal Midha. This academic article is
about how piracy continues to be a threat to the global economy. Results of
structural equation modeling using a sample of 219 college students provide
evidence that individuals having an optimism bias engage in piracy


 CNN Money- This site is helpful because it includes graphs and statistics
which I really need for my research.
EVALUATION PROCESS

 factual because they are written by journalist and experts.

 information is often presented in a way which in unbiased.
With the scholarly article, I can trust that that the information
is reliable because it is often written by a professor
or scholar in that particular field.

Media piracy library research class

  • 1.
    MEDIA PIRACY IT’SALL A CRIME Creators: Dajane Martin Paige Boose Tori Slater Brittany Davies
  • 2.
  • 3.
    THE QUESTION ABOUT PIRACY  What negative affects has media piracy had on the American society? - One of the things I did to narrow the question I came up with was to keep my question geared towards a specific area which is America. Also instead of just saying effects, because there could be negative and positive affects I just focused on the negative part of piracy. My argument is basically stating that even though many people
  • 4.
    MY POINT  Ithink the most important point/argument that I am trying to make is that media piracy is not something that only affects the criminals who do it. It also affects the people who don’t do because the prices of the media rises and someone that they know may also get them in trouble. So media piracy affects the criminals and the producers but also innocent people. This is a whole society that media piracy is affecting.
  • 5.
    THE SUPPORT BOOKS Peer to Peer and the music industry: The criminalization of sharing. Cite: David, Matthew. Peer to Peer and the Music Industry: The Criminalization of Sharing. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2010. Print.  Pop song piracy: Disobedient music distribution since 1929. Cite: Kernfeld, Barry Dean. Pop Song Piracy: Disobedient Music Distribution Since 1929. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011. Print
  • 6.
    THE SUPPORT ARTICLES Scholarly Article: Jailhouse Frocks: Locating the Public Interest in Policing Counterfeit Luxury Fashion Goods British Journal of Criminology November 1, 2010 50: 1094-1116  Popular Article: Music piracy stunting digital music revenue: industry exec. Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • 7.
    THE SUPPORT WEBSITE Galileo. Georgia Library Learning Online. 15 september 1995 <http://www.galileo.usg.edu/scholar/westga/subjects/?Welcome>
  • 8.
    LETS EVALUATE  Thesources I used are all credible because they are either from reliable sources like Galileo which is a online Georgia library for GA or are all written by authors that have good rating or that are professors, researchers, or are in other form of a high profession.
  • 9.
  • 10.
    RESEARCH QUESTION  Arethe consequences too heavy when one commits the act of piracy on media?  I chose this research question after my group and I talked over multiple topics we could pull from our over all topic of Piracy and I was interested in learning about the consequences that come with being caught stealing media.  I narrowed my question down from asking about consequences in general to dealing with only consequences being too heavy while also making my question arguable at the same time.
  • 11.
    ARGUMENT?  My argumentis that consequences seem to vary from being too light or too heavy. I think that consequences are too heavy at times when stealing media. I say this because there are many websites circulating through the internet and many people think that since there is a website for piracy than it must be okay. We forget that stealing media is just like stealing a purse from a department store. It is illegal and many will be caught. I think that more advertisements should be presented so this way we will be more educated with the act of piracy.
  • 12.
    RESEARCH SOURCES  Frommy five sources I think that three of them will be very sufficient towards my research. My first source is a book called, Peer to Peer and the Music Industry: The Criminalization of Sharing. Second source is an article called, Purchase or Pirate: A Model of Consumer Intellectual Property Theft. Third source is my second article choice called, Digital Piracy: Causes, Consequences and Strategic Responses.  All of these sources will back up my position because they all have to deal with consequences and why one should purchase media and not pirate.  Information is also given to what factors lead to someone committing the act of piracy.
  • 13.
    EVALUATION  My sourcesare credible after I looked over who was the author or authors and many were college professors and even sources were cited within my sources.  I knew my sources would be relevant to my research because they all have information focusing mainly on what leads to piracy, consequences and even laws that deal with piracy and how they are used when someone has been caught.
  • 14.
  • 15.
    W H ATA R E T H E E F F E C T S O F P I R AC Y ON ARTIST AND THEIR LABEL? I narrowed my question by focusing on artist and their label, and did some presearching.
  • 16.
    MY ARGUMENT  Piracyon music has major effects on artist and their label?
  • 17.
    THE RESOURCES  Thebook I used gets more in depth with music piracy  The scholarly article is helpful because its written by experts  The website helps me because its unbiased and relevant
  • 19.
  • 20.
    MY RESEARCH QUESTION Should music piracy be legalized?  I came up with my question by first doing some pre searching. I search in Google key terms like “music piracy problems” to get a general idea about my topic.  The first variation of my question was: what are the negative effects of piracy. This question was way too broad and had no clear room for opinions.  I did some more pre searching and saw an article about legalizing music piracy  I then formulated the question: Should music piracy be legalized?  This is a good question because it is not too broad nor too narrow  There are two opposing sides for an argument  There is more than enough information which I can find based on this question
  • 21.
    POSITION/ THESIS I believethat music piracy should not be legalized because it promotes stealing in such a free manner. Piracy in the music industry has lead to problems within the economy as well as money loss for artist. Stealing is still a crime and those guilty should be held accountable.
  • 22.
    ARGUMENT  Money lossfor artist  Promotes stealing  Negative effects on the economy  I answered my research question by finding evidence to back up my thesis statement. Within my sources I found information about how piracy within the music industry has had negative effects on the US economy
  • 23.
    YOUR RESEARCH  Article:It won’t happen to me: An assessment of optimism bias in music piracy, written by Ankur Nandedkar and Vishal Midha. This academic article is about how piracy continues to be a threat to the global economy. Results of structural equation modeling using a sample of 219 college students provide evidence that individuals having an optimism bias engage in piracy  CNN Money- This site is helpful because it includes graphs and statistics which I really need for my research.
  • 24.
    EVALUATION PROCESS  factualbecause they are written by journalist and experts.  information is often presented in a way which in unbiased. With the scholarly article, I can trust that that the information is reliable because it is often written by a professor or scholar in that particular field.