There’s Gonna Be A Law! Workplace Bullying The Campaign to Enact the anti-bullying
WBI Definition Work•place Bul•ly•ing   n   verbal abuse, or threats, intimidation, humiliation, or work interference, sabotage, or exploitation of a known vulnerability, or a combination of any repeated, health-harming mistreatment by one or more people of an employee by:
2010 U.S. Workplace Bullying Survey THE SECOND RESPRESENTATIVE STUDY OF ALL ADULT AMERICANS
U.S. Prevalence WBI U.S. Natl 2010 50% No Experience 9% Current 15% Witnessed Only 26% Been Bullied
WBI U.S. Natl 2010
Bullying of Men & Women by Women & Men 38% 62% WBI U.S. Natl 2010
Bullying Worsens in Tough Times 27 % MORE Abusive 67 % Unchanged 5 % Less WBI Summer 2009
It ’ s True -- Most Bullies Are Bosses Bosses 72% CWs 18% Bottom Up 10% WBI U.S. Natl 2007
Retaliation 37% Who Is Targeted? WBI U.S. Natl 2007
Retaliation 37% $$$  Impact on Organizations
Tangible Employer Costs Turnover and Replacement Costs Absenteeism, Presenteeism Fatigue-Caused Errors & Accidents Fouled Team Productivity Litigation/Arbitration/Settlement Expenses  Workers Comp / Disability
Estimating Employer Costs 9% of workforce is currently bullied 66% of women targets lose jobs Bullying accounts for 6% preventable workforce loss
Replacement = 2 x salary To replace a $50,000 salaried worker costs $100,000 Assume a staff of 100 at that pay rate
Due to bullying, 6 people are lost Cost to replace is $600,000 Is this an affordable cost?
Retaliation 37% BULLIES ARE  TOO EXPENSIVE TO KEEP! A rational, evidence/data-based truth
U.S. Employers’  Response to Bullying
Employers Mostly Ignore It WBI U.S. Natl 2007
Bullies Bully with Impunity No consequences 54% Rewarded 28% Investigated 14% Punished/Terminated 4% WBI Labor Day 2009
 
The Comprehensive Program to Prevent & Correct Workplace Bullying
Assess Pre-Change Prevalence Collaboratively Create an Anti-Bullying Policy  Design Enforcement Procedures applicable to all Train a Peer Expert Team Educate everyone -- Board to Temps Incorporation, Integration & Impact Evaluation © 2010 Work Doctor®, Inc.
 
Retaliation 37% There Oughta Be a Law!
Laws Dictate Compliance Laws POLICIES ENFORCEMENT Prevention & Correction
Current Anti-Bullying Laws Sweden: Victimisation At Work, 1994 France: Modernisation At Work, 2002 UK: Harassment ( ’ 97) & UN-HR Covenants Australia: 1997 onward Canada: Quebec ( ’ 04), Sask ( ’ 07),  Federal ( ’ 08), Ontario ( ’ 10), Manitoba ( ’ 11) Victoria, Australia -- CRIMINAL ( ’ 11) U.S.:  nothing, 0, zip, nada
Retaliation 37% Support for a Law? WBI U.S. Natl 2010 Support 64% Oppose 24% No Opinion 12%
Introduced in 21 States since 2003 The U.S. Anti-Bullying  Legislative Campaign
It will be unlawful to subject  an employee to an  ‘ abusive work environment ’
Abusive conduct is malicious, repeated mistreatment (verbal abuse, threats, intimidation, humiliation, work sabotage, exploitation of a known vulnerability) that results in demonstrable health harm or negative employment decisions
Affirmative Defensives for  Good Employers •  Right to discipline poor performers •  Right to terminate for illegal activity •  No vicarious liability when policy &  enforcement procedures in effect and are used
Right to Sue Individual Bullies
The National Grassroots Campaign
Status of the HWB in Massachusetts: House Bill 2310, filed by Representative Ellen Story Senate Bill 916, filed by Senator Katherine Clark Heard before the Joint Committee on Labor and Workforce Development, July 14, 2011.  Contact your State Representative and State Senator and ask them to support H.2310/S.916 (The Healthy Workplace Bill!
 

Massachusetts Healthy Workplace Bill

  • 1.
    There’s Gonna BeA Law! Workplace Bullying The Campaign to Enact the anti-bullying
  • 2.
    WBI Definition Work•placeBul•ly•ing n verbal abuse, or threats, intimidation, humiliation, or work interference, sabotage, or exploitation of a known vulnerability, or a combination of any repeated, health-harming mistreatment by one or more people of an employee by:
  • 3.
    2010 U.S. WorkplaceBullying Survey THE SECOND RESPRESENTATIVE STUDY OF ALL ADULT AMERICANS
  • 4.
    U.S. Prevalence WBIU.S. Natl 2010 50% No Experience 9% Current 15% Witnessed Only 26% Been Bullied
  • 5.
  • 6.
    Bullying of Men& Women by Women & Men 38% 62% WBI U.S. Natl 2010
  • 7.
    Bullying Worsens inTough Times 27 % MORE Abusive 67 % Unchanged 5 % Less WBI Summer 2009
  • 8.
    It ’ sTrue -- Most Bullies Are Bosses Bosses 72% CWs 18% Bottom Up 10% WBI U.S. Natl 2007
  • 9.
    Retaliation 37% WhoIs Targeted? WBI U.S. Natl 2007
  • 10.
    Retaliation 37% $$$ Impact on Organizations
  • 11.
    Tangible Employer CostsTurnover and Replacement Costs Absenteeism, Presenteeism Fatigue-Caused Errors & Accidents Fouled Team Productivity Litigation/Arbitration/Settlement Expenses Workers Comp / Disability
  • 12.
    Estimating Employer Costs9% of workforce is currently bullied 66% of women targets lose jobs Bullying accounts for 6% preventable workforce loss
  • 13.
    Replacement = 2x salary To replace a $50,000 salaried worker costs $100,000 Assume a staff of 100 at that pay rate
  • 14.
    Due to bullying,6 people are lost Cost to replace is $600,000 Is this an affordable cost?
  • 15.
    Retaliation 37% BULLIESARE TOO EXPENSIVE TO KEEP! A rational, evidence/data-based truth
  • 16.
    U.S. Employers’ Response to Bullying
  • 17.
    Employers Mostly IgnoreIt WBI U.S. Natl 2007
  • 18.
    Bullies Bully withImpunity No consequences 54% Rewarded 28% Investigated 14% Punished/Terminated 4% WBI Labor Day 2009
  • 19.
  • 20.
    The Comprehensive Programto Prevent & Correct Workplace Bullying
  • 21.
    Assess Pre-Change PrevalenceCollaboratively Create an Anti-Bullying Policy Design Enforcement Procedures applicable to all Train a Peer Expert Team Educate everyone -- Board to Temps Incorporation, Integration & Impact Evaluation © 2010 Work Doctor®, Inc.
  • 22.
  • 23.
    Retaliation 37% ThereOughta Be a Law!
  • 24.
    Laws Dictate ComplianceLaws POLICIES ENFORCEMENT Prevention & Correction
  • 25.
    Current Anti-Bullying LawsSweden: Victimisation At Work, 1994 France: Modernisation At Work, 2002 UK: Harassment ( ’ 97) & UN-HR Covenants Australia: 1997 onward Canada: Quebec ( ’ 04), Sask ( ’ 07), Federal ( ’ 08), Ontario ( ’ 10), Manitoba ( ’ 11) Victoria, Australia -- CRIMINAL ( ’ 11) U.S.: nothing, 0, zip, nada
  • 26.
    Retaliation 37% Supportfor a Law? WBI U.S. Natl 2010 Support 64% Oppose 24% No Opinion 12%
  • 27.
    Introduced in 21States since 2003 The U.S. Anti-Bullying Legislative Campaign
  • 28.
    It will beunlawful to subject an employee to an ‘ abusive work environment ’
  • 29.
    Abusive conduct ismalicious, repeated mistreatment (verbal abuse, threats, intimidation, humiliation, work sabotage, exploitation of a known vulnerability) that results in demonstrable health harm or negative employment decisions
  • 30.
    Affirmative Defensives for Good Employers • Right to discipline poor performers • Right to terminate for illegal activity • No vicarious liability when policy & enforcement procedures in effect and are used
  • 31.
    Right to SueIndividual Bullies
  • 32.
  • 33.
    Status of theHWB in Massachusetts: House Bill 2310, filed by Representative Ellen Story Senate Bill 916, filed by Senator Katherine Clark Heard before the Joint Committee on Labor and Workforce Development, July 14, 2011. Contact your State Representative and State Senator and ask them to support H.2310/S.916 (The Healthy Workplace Bill!
  • 34.