Governance and Nation-Building in Nigeria: Some Reflections on Options for Po...
Market-based low carbon retrofit in social housing
1. Market-based retrofit in
social housing
Dr Jenni Cauvain, University of Nottingham
11 September 2017
Acknowledgements: Andy Karvonen (KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Stockholm) and Saska Petrova (University of Manchester)
2. Backdrop: literature
• Eco-state re-scaling, territorial carbon targets (While et al 2010)
• The reconfiguration of climate change as a “cities” (local government) issue
(Betsill and Bulkeley 2007)
• Social housing stock condition and privatisation (nb New Labour, Ginsburg
2005)
• Social housing landlords as “market leaders” (ARUP…)
• The rise and fall of low carbon policy incentives (Green Deal, ECO, FiTs….)
3. A case study of Greater Manchester
• Greater Manchester Combined Authority and new “Low Carbon Hub”
funded via GM’s City Deal
• Social housing stock as a “strategic asset” to stimulate the low carbon
market (solar PV, air source heat pumps, insulation and ventilation)
• Utility companies and their “obligation”
• Social landlords’ objectives: debt and poverty relief, future proofing
stock, business viability
4. Conclusions
• Housing stock condition has been used as a political pawn in successive
reforms to ‘demunicipalize’ social housing
• Local authorities attempt to harness the collectivities still associated with
the social housing sector to address the urban sustainability agenda.
• Social landlords’ retrofit practices, whilst loosely framed as carbon control,
are focused on the social aims, ethos and business model of the landlord
• Potential conflicts between the interests of different actors whose ‘low
carbon economy’ is conceived at different spatial scales and with different
underlying objectives
• As social landlords are foregrounded in sub-regional low carbon policy,
they are coopted into market-based retrofit. This may have unintended
consequences for the social housing sector
5. Suggested reading
• Betsill M, Bulkeley H (2007) Looking Back and Thinking Ahead: A
Decade of Cities and Climate Change Research. Local Environment:
The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 12.5, 447-456
• Ginsburg, N. (2005) ‘The privatization of council housing’, Critical
Social Policy, 25(1), pp. 115–135.
• While A, Jonas, AEG, Gibbs D (2010) “From sustainable development
to carbon control: eco-state restructuring and the politics of urban
and regional development” Transactions of the Institute of British
Geographers 35(1) 76-93