Manufacturer of Led light
•
0 likes•217 views
This short document promotes creating presentations using Haiku Deck, a tool for making slideshows. It encourages the reader to get started making their own Haiku Deck presentation and sharing it on SlideShare. In a single sentence, it pitches the idea of using Haiku Deck to easily create and share slideshow presentations online.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Art of ClEvR using The Giver
In the novel The Giver, the community views adolescence/puberty (called "Stirrings") as a major problem. They force all citizens to take a pill that eliminates sexual desires. When a young person has their first sexual dream, they must report it. The community enforces these strict controls over sexuality and choices to maintain order and prevent people from making their own "wrong" decisions.
Greek & Latin Roots 3
The document lists 12 Greek and Latin roots and provides an example word and definition for each root. The roots cover terms relating to head, speaking, nothing, fighting, fear, blame, knowledge, whole, and origin.
All 80 greek roots
The document provides a list of Greek and Latin roots along with their meanings and examples of words that use each root. It explains that learning the roots will help with vocabulary building. Several roots are defined relating to concepts like man, rule, hear, color, time, cut, speak, write, love, and city among many others.
Latin root word list
This root word list provides definitions for common Latin and Greek roots found in scientific terms. Keeping this list in a science notebook can help students figure out the meanings of new terms by recognizing their component word parts. The list is organized alphabetically and provides brief, one-word definitions for each root.
Argumentative writing notes
The document provides notes on argumentative writing for a test scheduled on March 25th. It outlines that the paper will be graded on focus, organization, support and elaboration, style, and conventions. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the purpose, audience, and context (PAC) of the writing prompt. Students are advised to create an outline using a tree map with the topic and three reasons/solutions before writing a five paragraph paper with an introduction, three body paragraphs using the SEEB or REEB structure, and a conclusion. The document stresses proofreading the final draft carefully.
Evaluating Scientific Claims, a teacher workshop
Evaluating Scientific Claims, Cornelia Harris, Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies. Presented at Teaching the Hudson Valley's 2012 summer institute.
Counter argument presentation
This document discusses the counter argument, which is bringing up arguments against your own position in a paper. It explains that counter arguments allow you to address opposing views and appear more reliable to readers. The document provides examples of how to briefly mention a counter point and then dismiss it to further support your own argument. It recommends including a separate paragraph on the counter argument after the two body paragraphs supporting your position.
Full lesson 2 presentation
This document discusses the key differences between argumentative and persuasive writing. Argumentative writing aims to convince the reader by acknowledging and refuting opposing views using reliable evidence. Persuasive writing focuses only on supporting the writer's stance and does not necessarily acknowledge alternative perspectives. The document provides examples of argumentative and persuasive approaches to issues like gun control laws and voting age requirements. It prompts the reader to practice each style by outlining arguments for or against school uniforms and changing the voting age.
Recommended
Art of ClEvR using The Giver
In the novel The Giver, the community views adolescence/puberty (called "Stirrings") as a major problem. They force all citizens to take a pill that eliminates sexual desires. When a young person has their first sexual dream, they must report it. The community enforces these strict controls over sexuality and choices to maintain order and prevent people from making their own "wrong" decisions.
Greek & Latin Roots 3
The document lists 12 Greek and Latin roots and provides an example word and definition for each root. The roots cover terms relating to head, speaking, nothing, fighting, fear, blame, knowledge, whole, and origin.
All 80 greek roots
The document provides a list of Greek and Latin roots along with their meanings and examples of words that use each root. It explains that learning the roots will help with vocabulary building. Several roots are defined relating to concepts like man, rule, hear, color, time, cut, speak, write, love, and city among many others.
Latin root word list
This root word list provides definitions for common Latin and Greek roots found in scientific terms. Keeping this list in a science notebook can help students figure out the meanings of new terms by recognizing their component word parts. The list is organized alphabetically and provides brief, one-word definitions for each root.
Argumentative writing notes
The document provides notes on argumentative writing for a test scheduled on March 25th. It outlines that the paper will be graded on focus, organization, support and elaboration, style, and conventions. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the purpose, audience, and context (PAC) of the writing prompt. Students are advised to create an outline using a tree map with the topic and three reasons/solutions before writing a five paragraph paper with an introduction, three body paragraphs using the SEEB or REEB structure, and a conclusion. The document stresses proofreading the final draft carefully.
Evaluating Scientific Claims, a teacher workshop
Evaluating Scientific Claims, Cornelia Harris, Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies. Presented at Teaching the Hudson Valley's 2012 summer institute.
Counter argument presentation
This document discusses the counter argument, which is bringing up arguments against your own position in a paper. It explains that counter arguments allow you to address opposing views and appear more reliable to readers. The document provides examples of how to briefly mention a counter point and then dismiss it to further support your own argument. It recommends including a separate paragraph on the counter argument after the two body paragraphs supporting your position.
Full lesson 2 presentation
This document discusses the key differences between argumentative and persuasive writing. Argumentative writing aims to convince the reader by acknowledging and refuting opposing views using reliable evidence. Persuasive writing focuses only on supporting the writer's stance and does not necessarily acknowledge alternative perspectives. The document provides examples of argumentative and persuasive approaches to issues like gun control laws and voting age requirements. It prompts the reader to practice each style by outlining arguments for or against school uniforms and changing the voting age.
Teaching Argumentative Writing
This document summarizes research on teaching argumentative skills to middle school students. It begins by defining argumentation and distinguishing it from persuasion. It then examines two studies: 1) A quasi-experimental study that looked at engaging 8th graders in argumentative discourse activities and found improvements in individual arguments and peer discussions. 2) A case study of a 7th grade class that engaged in a debate project on capital punishment, which also found gains in student argument skills. The document provides an overview of key components of arguments like claims, evidence, warrants, rebuttals, and discusses challenges adolescents face with argumentation. It concludes that structured activities focused on developing these skills can enhance students' abilities to construct and engage in arguments.
Claim, Evidence, and Reasoning
This document outlines a presentation about helping students write arguments using claims, evidence, and reasoning. The presentation introduces the claims-evidence-reasoning framework, provides examples of how it applies to different science disciplines, and offers strategies for implementing it in the classroom. These include engaging students in generating claims and evidence before writing, using transition words to connect ideas, and providing rubrics or peer review to give feedback on student work. The goal is to teach students to structure arguments like scientists by making claims and supporting them with logical reasoning and evidence.
Concession and rebuttal worksheet
The document discusses concession and rebuttal paragraphs. It provides guidance on how to structure these paragraphs when writing an essay.
A concession paragraph should:
1) Acknowledge the opposing viewpoint to the thesis statement. This concedes that the counterargument has merit.
2) Refute the counterargument by showing why it is incorrect or not as significant as the thesis argument.
The document uses the thesis statement "Although space is limited and new buildings require land, providing adequate student parking needs to be a college priority" as an example. It provides templates for introducing the concession of the counterargument and then rebutting it in the same paragraph.
Writing an argument
The document provides an overview of writing an argument. It defines an argument and explains that an argument seeks to convince a reader by appealing to reason, emotions, or ethics. It also discusses coming up with a claim, considering your audience and purpose, templates for arguing, organizing an argument by stating your claim and supporting it with evidence, and establishing your own credibility.
Dr. seuss let's talk about stereotypes
Kick off Dr. Seuss Day/ Read Across America Let's Talk about Stereotypes using claim, evidence, reasoning.
Argument writing
The document provides a 9-step process for writing an argumentative essay. Step 1 involves reading the prompt and determining the issue. Step 2 has the writer read both passages related to the issue. Step 3 is to closely read and annotate the passages to find evidence for both sides. Step 4 is to choose a side to argue. Step 5 is to make an outline organizing thoughts. Step 6 details planning each paragraph with evidence from the text. Step 7 stresses using evidence from both passages. Step 8 is to draft the essay. Step 9 is to review and edit the draft. The document then reviews key elements like introducing evidence, counterarguments, and concluding thoughts.
The argument paragraph 091
The document provides guidance on writing an effective argument paper. It should begin with an introductory paragraph that sets up a debatable topic and thesis. The body should provide background information, reasons supporting the thesis with examples, and anticipate and rebut opposing positions. The conclusion should call the reader to action without an abrupt ending. Tone should be fair, credible, and avoid exaggeration.
Claim evidence and reasoning presentation
This document provides instructions for creating an argument using a graphic organizer with four boxes: observations, claim, evidence, and reasoning. Students are asked to look at a photo and write their observations in the first box. They then formulate a claim based on patterns in their observations. Evidence includes data from the photo that supports the claim, and reasoning explains how the evidence logically connects to and proves the claim. The document defines each part and provides examples of an effective claim, relevant evidence, and detailed reasoning.
ANES 1501 PPT - M3: Creating an Academic Argument
This document provides guidance on creating academic arguments in writing. It discusses the key components of argumentative writing, including introducing topics, presenting a clear thesis statement, using evidence-based claims from research to support the thesis, and acknowledging and refuting opposing views. The document also covers organizing arguments using different formats, such as point-by-point or block comparisons. It provides examples of introducing topics, outlining body paragraphs, and wrapping up with a conclusion that restates the main points without introducing new information.
Organizing your argument—OWL
This document discusses how to effectively organize an argument. It emphasizes that an argument requires a clear claim supported by logical reasoning and evidence. The key components of an organized argument are a title to introduce the topic, an introduction stating the thesis, body paragraphs with topic sentences supporting the thesis by providing evidence and addressing counterarguments, and a conclusion recapping the main points. Proper organization guides the audience through the reasoning and establishes the writer's credibility.
Claims evidence and reasoning presentation
The document provides instructions on how to write a scientific explanation using a claim, evidence, and reasoning. It explains that a claim answers the original question, evidence supports the claim, and reasoning connects the evidence to the claim. It then gives an example of analyzing what happened to a man named Mr. Xavier, with a claim that he was murdered by overdosing on heart medication, evidence like fingerprints and traces of medication, and reasoning that this evidence proves the brother committed the crime. Finally, it discusses analyzing real-world claims and providing homework to construct a claim, evidence, and reasoning.
Claims + evidence + reasoning explanation
This document outlines the components of a claim, evidence, and reasoning (CER) explanation. A claim answers a question and states what is known. Evidence provides observations to support the claim. Reasoning explains how the evidence supports the claim. The document provides examples of claims, evidence, and reasoning and illustrates how they work together to form a scientific explanation.
Argument writing presentation
The document provides an overview of the key components of an argumentative essay, including making a claim, supporting the claim with evidence, acknowledging counterclaims, refuting counterclaims, and concluding with a strong statement. It outlines the structure and elements of an argument, and includes examples to illustrate each component.
Argumentative writingessaygraphicorganizerw.11 12.1
This document provides a graphic organizer for writing an argumentative essay. It outlines the key components of an introduction with an attention grabber and thesis statement. The body should include topic sentences, evidence from credible sources to support claims, and reasoning. A conclusion restates the focus statement and thesis, and leaves a lasting impression. It also notes that a counterclaim and rebuttal can be included. The overall goal is to support a claim using valid reasoning and sufficient evidence per the Common Core standard presented.
Argumentative essay rubric
This document contains an argumentative essay rubric for grades 11-12 that assesses writing on four criteria: development, organization, reading/research, and language/conventions. For each criterion, descriptors define performance levels from novice to exceeds to score writing skills from 1 to 4. The rubric provides teachers a framework to evaluate how thoroughly students develop claims, organize arguments, integrate research, and demonstrate writing mechanics.
How to write an argumentative essay
An argumentative essay requires a writer to defend a position on a topic using evidence from various sources to support their viewpoint. It is important to research multiple sides of an issue when preparing to write an argumentative essay. The structure typically includes an introduction with a thesis statement, body paragraphs with supporting details and explanations, a counterargument paragraph, and a conclusion that restates the main points. Body paragraphs should each contain a topic sentence, supporting details, an explanation, and a conclusion or transition to the next paragraph. A counterargument acknowledges an opposing view before the writer rebuts it. The conclusion restates the topic, thesis, addresses other viewpoints, and sometimes suggests future action.
Presentation argumentative essay
The document discusses planning and writing an argumentative essay. It provides scoring guides for evaluating such essays, discusses principles of GRE writing, and outlines Kaplan's 5-step method for writing argumentative essays. The scoring guides describe what is expected at different score levels, including clearly identifying and analyzing an argument's features, logically organizing ideas, and demonstrating language control. The 4 principles of GRE writing emphasize demonstrating language control, valuing simplicity, not worrying about minor errors, and focusing on the goal. Kaplan's 5 steps include taking an argument apart, selecting points to make, outlining an essay using their template, writing the essay, and proofreading.
Persuasion and argument in writing
This document provides an overview of writing as a process in language study. It discusses the importance of writing and defines writing as a complex and cognitively demanding activity. It notes that to be successful writers, students need an understanding of writing components and strategies. The document then examines the nature of writing as a process involving various activities. It analyzes key writing components to increase awareness of what occurs when students create written texts. It also discusses the value of writing and differentiates between writing in first and second languages. Specifically, it outlines five main groups of second language learners and notes that factors like age, education level, language similarity, and need determine writing ability in a second language.
Creating an argument
This is a PowerPoint that explains how to create an argument. Students should use this to help them create their Panel Presentations.
Argumentative Writing
This document provides an overview of argumentative writing elements and structures for students in a WRIT 122 college course. It defines key elements like claims, reasons, evidence and addressing opposition. It also explains the structures of Toulmin, classical and Rogerian arguments, highlighting their different components and approaches. The document aims to help students learn and apply these concepts in their own argumentative writing.
More Related Content
Viewers also liked
Teaching Argumentative Writing
This document summarizes research on teaching argumentative skills to middle school students. It begins by defining argumentation and distinguishing it from persuasion. It then examines two studies: 1) A quasi-experimental study that looked at engaging 8th graders in argumentative discourse activities and found improvements in individual arguments and peer discussions. 2) A case study of a 7th grade class that engaged in a debate project on capital punishment, which also found gains in student argument skills. The document provides an overview of key components of arguments like claims, evidence, warrants, rebuttals, and discusses challenges adolescents face with argumentation. It concludes that structured activities focused on developing these skills can enhance students' abilities to construct and engage in arguments.
Claim, Evidence, and Reasoning
This document outlines a presentation about helping students write arguments using claims, evidence, and reasoning. The presentation introduces the claims-evidence-reasoning framework, provides examples of how it applies to different science disciplines, and offers strategies for implementing it in the classroom. These include engaging students in generating claims and evidence before writing, using transition words to connect ideas, and providing rubrics or peer review to give feedback on student work. The goal is to teach students to structure arguments like scientists by making claims and supporting them with logical reasoning and evidence.
Concession and rebuttal worksheet
The document discusses concession and rebuttal paragraphs. It provides guidance on how to structure these paragraphs when writing an essay.
A concession paragraph should:
1) Acknowledge the opposing viewpoint to the thesis statement. This concedes that the counterargument has merit.
2) Refute the counterargument by showing why it is incorrect or not as significant as the thesis argument.
The document uses the thesis statement "Although space is limited and new buildings require land, providing adequate student parking needs to be a college priority" as an example. It provides templates for introducing the concession of the counterargument and then rebutting it in the same paragraph.
Writing an argument
The document provides an overview of writing an argument. It defines an argument and explains that an argument seeks to convince a reader by appealing to reason, emotions, or ethics. It also discusses coming up with a claim, considering your audience and purpose, templates for arguing, organizing an argument by stating your claim and supporting it with evidence, and establishing your own credibility.
Dr. seuss let's talk about stereotypes
Kick off Dr. Seuss Day/ Read Across America Let's Talk about Stereotypes using claim, evidence, reasoning.
Argument writing
The document provides a 9-step process for writing an argumentative essay. Step 1 involves reading the prompt and determining the issue. Step 2 has the writer read both passages related to the issue. Step 3 is to closely read and annotate the passages to find evidence for both sides. Step 4 is to choose a side to argue. Step 5 is to make an outline organizing thoughts. Step 6 details planning each paragraph with evidence from the text. Step 7 stresses using evidence from both passages. Step 8 is to draft the essay. Step 9 is to review and edit the draft. The document then reviews key elements like introducing evidence, counterarguments, and concluding thoughts.
The argument paragraph 091
The document provides guidance on writing an effective argument paper. It should begin with an introductory paragraph that sets up a debatable topic and thesis. The body should provide background information, reasons supporting the thesis with examples, and anticipate and rebut opposing positions. The conclusion should call the reader to action without an abrupt ending. Tone should be fair, credible, and avoid exaggeration.
Claim evidence and reasoning presentation
This document provides instructions for creating an argument using a graphic organizer with four boxes: observations, claim, evidence, and reasoning. Students are asked to look at a photo and write their observations in the first box. They then formulate a claim based on patterns in their observations. Evidence includes data from the photo that supports the claim, and reasoning explains how the evidence logically connects to and proves the claim. The document defines each part and provides examples of an effective claim, relevant evidence, and detailed reasoning.
ANES 1501 PPT - M3: Creating an Academic Argument
This document provides guidance on creating academic arguments in writing. It discusses the key components of argumentative writing, including introducing topics, presenting a clear thesis statement, using evidence-based claims from research to support the thesis, and acknowledging and refuting opposing views. The document also covers organizing arguments using different formats, such as point-by-point or block comparisons. It provides examples of introducing topics, outlining body paragraphs, and wrapping up with a conclusion that restates the main points without introducing new information.
Organizing your argument—OWL
This document discusses how to effectively organize an argument. It emphasizes that an argument requires a clear claim supported by logical reasoning and evidence. The key components of an organized argument are a title to introduce the topic, an introduction stating the thesis, body paragraphs with topic sentences supporting the thesis by providing evidence and addressing counterarguments, and a conclusion recapping the main points. Proper organization guides the audience through the reasoning and establishes the writer's credibility.
Claims evidence and reasoning presentation
The document provides instructions on how to write a scientific explanation using a claim, evidence, and reasoning. It explains that a claim answers the original question, evidence supports the claim, and reasoning connects the evidence to the claim. It then gives an example of analyzing what happened to a man named Mr. Xavier, with a claim that he was murdered by overdosing on heart medication, evidence like fingerprints and traces of medication, and reasoning that this evidence proves the brother committed the crime. Finally, it discusses analyzing real-world claims and providing homework to construct a claim, evidence, and reasoning.
Claims + evidence + reasoning explanation
This document outlines the components of a claim, evidence, and reasoning (CER) explanation. A claim answers a question and states what is known. Evidence provides observations to support the claim. Reasoning explains how the evidence supports the claim. The document provides examples of claims, evidence, and reasoning and illustrates how they work together to form a scientific explanation.
Argument writing presentation
The document provides an overview of the key components of an argumentative essay, including making a claim, supporting the claim with evidence, acknowledging counterclaims, refuting counterclaims, and concluding with a strong statement. It outlines the structure and elements of an argument, and includes examples to illustrate each component.
Argumentative writingessaygraphicorganizerw.11 12.1
This document provides a graphic organizer for writing an argumentative essay. It outlines the key components of an introduction with an attention grabber and thesis statement. The body should include topic sentences, evidence from credible sources to support claims, and reasoning. A conclusion restates the focus statement and thesis, and leaves a lasting impression. It also notes that a counterclaim and rebuttal can be included. The overall goal is to support a claim using valid reasoning and sufficient evidence per the Common Core standard presented.
Argumentative essay rubric
This document contains an argumentative essay rubric for grades 11-12 that assesses writing on four criteria: development, organization, reading/research, and language/conventions. For each criterion, descriptors define performance levels from novice to exceeds to score writing skills from 1 to 4. The rubric provides teachers a framework to evaluate how thoroughly students develop claims, organize arguments, integrate research, and demonstrate writing mechanics.
How to write an argumentative essay
An argumentative essay requires a writer to defend a position on a topic using evidence from various sources to support their viewpoint. It is important to research multiple sides of an issue when preparing to write an argumentative essay. The structure typically includes an introduction with a thesis statement, body paragraphs with supporting details and explanations, a counterargument paragraph, and a conclusion that restates the main points. Body paragraphs should each contain a topic sentence, supporting details, an explanation, and a conclusion or transition to the next paragraph. A counterargument acknowledges an opposing view before the writer rebuts it. The conclusion restates the topic, thesis, addresses other viewpoints, and sometimes suggests future action.
Presentation argumentative essay
The document discusses planning and writing an argumentative essay. It provides scoring guides for evaluating such essays, discusses principles of GRE writing, and outlines Kaplan's 5-step method for writing argumentative essays. The scoring guides describe what is expected at different score levels, including clearly identifying and analyzing an argument's features, logically organizing ideas, and demonstrating language control. The 4 principles of GRE writing emphasize demonstrating language control, valuing simplicity, not worrying about minor errors, and focusing on the goal. Kaplan's 5 steps include taking an argument apart, selecting points to make, outlining an essay using their template, writing the essay, and proofreading.
Persuasion and argument in writing
This document provides an overview of writing as a process in language study. It discusses the importance of writing and defines writing as a complex and cognitively demanding activity. It notes that to be successful writers, students need an understanding of writing components and strategies. The document then examines the nature of writing as a process involving various activities. It analyzes key writing components to increase awareness of what occurs when students create written texts. It also discusses the value of writing and differentiates between writing in first and second languages. Specifically, it outlines five main groups of second language learners and notes that factors like age, education level, language similarity, and need determine writing ability in a second language.
Creating an argument
This is a PowerPoint that explains how to create an argument. Students should use this to help them create their Panel Presentations.
Argumentative Writing
This document provides an overview of argumentative writing elements and structures for students in a WRIT 122 college course. It defines key elements like claims, reasons, evidence and addressing opposition. It also explains the structures of Toulmin, classical and Rogerian arguments, highlighting their different components and approaches. The document aims to help students learn and apply these concepts in their own argumentative writing.
Viewers also liked (20)
Argumentative writingessaygraphicorganizerw.11 12.1
Argumentative writingessaygraphicorganizerw.11 12.1
Manufacturer of Led light
- 10. Inspired? Create your own Haiku Deck presentation on SlideShare! GET STARTED