The document summarizes Kalpeshkumar L Gupta's presentation on manual scavenging in India. It discusses how manual scavenging persists despite being banned by law. The presentation outlines India's laws prohibiting manual scavenging and rehabilitating scavengers. However, implementation has been ineffective as the practice continues unabated. It notes various court orders directing states to enforce the laws. In conclusion, it recommends robust strategies and adequate funds are needed to fully rehabilitate scavengers and eliminate the practice to realize social equality as per the constitution.
Right to Information Act (RTI) a powerful law enacted in year 2005 for better governance in the country. RTI law is backed by Article 19(1) (a) of the Constitution of India which talks about freedom of speech and expression. For proper usage of this right one should have proper information about the Public Authority. Public Authority carries wider meaning than only government. There are two objectives of RTI Act, 2005, one is to bring transparency and accountability in governance and other one is to setting up of Central Information Commission (CIC) and State Information Commission (SIC) to hear appeals and complaints. There are lot of peculiarities in working of CIC and various SICs. Some state commissions are performing exceptionally well whereas some are lagging behind. Most of the state information commission offices are facing challenges in terms of vacancies which ultimately leading to backlog of appeals and complaints. Second biggest challenge is appointment of efficient Information Commissioners who can dispose cases in effective way and in timely manner. There are Information Commissioners who have given landmarks orders and disposed off large number of cases. Thus we can see the role of information commissioner is crucial for successful implementation of RTI Act, 2005.
Present paper will critically analyze working of Information Commission at central and state level alongwith some important orders delivered by CIC and SIC.
Right to Information Act (RTI) a powerful law enacted in year 2005 for better governance in the country. RTI law is backed by Article 19(1) (a) of the Constitution of India which talks about freedom of speech and expression. For proper usage of this right one should have proper information about the Public Authority. Public Authority carries wider meaning than only government. There are two objectives of RTI Act, 2005, one is to bring transparency and accountability in governance and other one is to setting up of Central Information Commission (CIC) and State Information Commission (SIC) to hear appeals and complaints. There are lot of peculiarities in working of CIC and various SICs. Some state commissions are performing exceptionally well whereas some are lagging behind. Most of the state information commission offices are facing challenges in terms of vacancies which ultimately leading to backlog of appeals and complaints. Second biggest challenge is appointment of efficient Information Commissioners who can dispose cases in effective way and in timely manner. There are Information Commissioners who have given landmarks orders and disposed off large number of cases. Thus we can see the role of information commissioner is crucial for successful implementation of RTI Act, 2005.
Present paper will critically analyze working of Information Commission at central and state level alongwith some important orders delivered by CIC and SIC.
This PPT Aims to provide knowledge and understanding about the concept of UCC, History of UCC, Law Commission Reports on UCC, Indian Constitution and UCC, Arguments in Favor of UCC, Arguments Against UCC, Importance of UCC, Challenges of UCC, Overcoming Challenges on UCC and So on.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) [LLB -309] cpjcollege
Alternative Dispute Resolution has become the primary means by which cases are resolved now days, especially commercial, business disputes. It has emerged as the preferred method for resolving civil cases, with litigation as a last resort. Alternative Dispute Resolution provides an overview of the statutory, procedural, and case law underlining these processes and their interplay with litigation. A significant theme is the evolving role of
professional ethics for attorneys operating in non-adversarial settings. Clients and courts increasingly express a preference for attorneys who are skilled not only in litigation but in problem-solving, which costs the clients less in terms of time, money and relationship. The law of ADR also provides an introduction to negotiation and mediation theory.
This explain object of Indian Limitation Act 1963. It define limitation. Explains how limitation is computed, what is effect of death, acknowledgement and prescription.
This explains what are parties to a suit, who can be joined as party to suit. It explains joinder, misjoinder, nonjoinder of parties. How parties may be added or struck out.
This PPT Aims to provide knowledge and understanding about the concept of UCC, History of UCC, Law Commission Reports on UCC, Indian Constitution and UCC, Arguments in Favor of UCC, Arguments Against UCC, Importance of UCC, Challenges of UCC, Overcoming Challenges on UCC and So on.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) [LLB -309] cpjcollege
Alternative Dispute Resolution has become the primary means by which cases are resolved now days, especially commercial, business disputes. It has emerged as the preferred method for resolving civil cases, with litigation as a last resort. Alternative Dispute Resolution provides an overview of the statutory, procedural, and case law underlining these processes and their interplay with litigation. A significant theme is the evolving role of
professional ethics for attorneys operating in non-adversarial settings. Clients and courts increasingly express a preference for attorneys who are skilled not only in litigation but in problem-solving, which costs the clients less in terms of time, money and relationship. The law of ADR also provides an introduction to negotiation and mediation theory.
This explain object of Indian Limitation Act 1963. It define limitation. Explains how limitation is computed, what is effect of death, acknowledgement and prescription.
This explains what are parties to a suit, who can be joined as party to suit. It explains joinder, misjoinder, nonjoinder of parties. How parties may be added or struck out.
A Video System for Measuring School Children Sitting Posture DynamicsWaqas Tariq
School children spent a lot of time sitting. Some Primary Schools in Slovenia were interested to improve pupil’s working conditions by introducing more dynamic type of sitting. A standard school chair was substituted with a large gymnastic ball. In order to evaluate influence of this substitution on sitting dynamics we developed a video system capable of assessing sitting posture in sagittal plain during prolonged period.
We composed a video acquisition system with video camera (Blaupunkt, CCR 808), simple optical markers with LED diodes and robust image analysing software. To test it we measured the sitting posture of eight school children, who were sitting for 30 minutes on a large gymnastic ball and on a chair without a backrest and armrest with the acquisition rate 3 s -1. Each image was analysed to determine position of markers and then the Lumbar Lordosis angle (LL) and the Pelvis Inclination angle (PI) time courses were calculated.
We found a measurement system very convenient in the conditions outside the laboratory. The level of backscatter which could impair automatic marker location extraction from the recorded image was low during all sessions. The marker in the recorded image had 30±10 pixels with different intensity. We found that during first 6 minutes the posture is more upright on the ball as compared to the chair (PI: chair 17.0±7.2, ball 13.2 ±8.5, p<0.05;>0.05).
A measurement system using consumer video camera, LED video markers and image analytics software is cost effective and reliable system which has minimal influence on students comfort during measurements outside the laboratory.
India's Water Policy and Strategy for ImplementationIWRS Society
NWRS was set uo on 10th Marhc, 1983 under the Chairpersonship of Prime Minister of India with Union Minister of Irrigation ( now WR, RD & GR ) as Vice Chairman
Development control rules,
Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act,
Land acquisition act,
Village planning: Necessity and principles,
Rural developments- Growth
centre approach, Area Development approach, Integrated rural development
approach.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...
Manual Scavenging in India : Issues & Challenges
1. Assistant Professor of LawAssistant Professor of Law
KALPESHKUMAR L GUPTAKALPESHKUMAR L GUPTA
State Level Seminar on Law &State Level Seminar on Law &
Society in 21Society in 21stst
CenturyCentury
May 31, 2015May 31, 2015
1
2. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Outline of the presentation
1.Introduction
2.Research Methodology
3.Law on Manual Scavenging
in India
4.Recent Scenario of Manual
Scavenging in India
5.Concluding Remarks
6.Q & A
2
3. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Outline of the presentation
1.Introduction
2.Research Methodology
3.Law on Manual Scavenging
in India
4.Recent Scenario of Manual
Scavenging in India
5.Concluding Remarks
6.Q & A
3
4. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Manual scavenging is the worst surviving
symbol of untouchability.
- National Advisory Council resolution, October 23, 2010
4
5. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Introduction :-
Manual Scavenging & Constitution of India
Article 14 - Right to Equality
Article 17 – Untouchability
Article 21 - Right to Life & Liberty
Article 46 - Promotion of educational and economic
interests of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and
other weaker sections
Article 47 - Duty of the State to raise the level of
nutrition and the standard of living and to improve
public health
5
Cont…
6. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Introduction :-
Statistics on Manual Scavenging
-Around 1.3 million manual scavengers in India
-95% are women.
-Around 10 billion dry latrines being cleaned manually.
6
Cont…
Cont…
7. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Introduction :-
Previous Laws on Manual Scavengers
-Employment of Manual Scavengers and Constructions
of Dry latrines (Prohibition) Act, 1993
-National Commission for Safai Karamcharis Act, 1993
-Finally new law..
The Prohibition of Employment as Manual
Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013
7
Cont…
8. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Outline of the presentation
1.Introduction
2.Research Methodology
3.Law on Manual Scavenging
in India
4.Recent Scenario of Manual
Scavenging in India
5.Concluding Remarks
6.Q & A
8
9. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Research Methodology
Present research work is based upon secondary data in
form of articles, news clippings, judicial decisions,
documentaries on the life of manual scavengers in India.
9
10. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Outline of the presentation
1.Introduction
2.Research Methodology
3.Law on Manual Scavenging
in India
4.Recent Scenario of Manual
Scavenging in India
5.Concluding Remarks
6.Q & A
10
11. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Manual Scavengers defined
…means a person engaged or employed, at the
commencement of this Act or at any time thereafter, by
an individual or a local authority or an agency or a
contractor,
……for manually cleaning, carrying, disposing of, or
otherwise handling in any manner, human excreta in an
insanitary latrine or in an open drain or pit into which the
human excreta from the insanitary latrines is disposed of,
or on a railway track or in such other spaces or premises,
as the Central Government or a State Government may
notify, before the excreta fully decomposes in such
manner as may be prescribed, and the expression
“manual scavenging” shall be construed accordingly.
11
12. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Prohibition on Manual Scavengers
- No person, local authority or any agency shall
construct an insanitary latrines or employ or engage
manual scavengers (Section 5). For contravention upto
1 year Imprisonment or with fine upto 50,000 or both
(Section 8).
- Not engage a person for hazardous cleaning of a sewer
or a septic tank. For contravention upto 2 year
Imprisonment or with fine upto 2 Lakh or both
(Section 9).
- Complaint within 3 months of the alleged commission
of the offence (Section 10)
12
13. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Manual Scavengers & their Rehabilitation
- Every municipality, Panchayat shall prepare list of manual
scavengers. They will be given ID card having details of
family members, dependents.
- Children will be entitled for scholarship.
- Allotment of residential plot and financial assistance for
house construction or ready made house.
- He or his one of family member will be given skill training
and minimum Rs. 3000 will be given as stipend.
- He or at least one adult member of his family shall be
given subsidy and concessional loan for taking up an
alternative occupation.
13
14. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Authorities for rehabilitation & trial of cases
- The District Magistrate of the district shall be responsible
for rehabilitation of each manual scavengers.
- All offences will be tried by Executive Magistrate u/s 21 of
the Act.
- Vigilance Committee for each district headed by District
Magistrate to advise District Magistrate/Sub-DM on the
actions which need to be taken to oversee the economic
and social rehabilitation of manual scavengers, to monitor
registration of offences under the act and their
investigation and prosecution (Section 25).
14
15. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Monitoring Committee
- Every state govt. shall constitute State Monitoring
Committee which will monitor and advise the state govt.
and local authorities for effective implementation of act
(Section 26, 27)
- Central Govt. will also Central Monitoring Committee
which will advise central & state govt. (Section 30).
- National Commission for Safai Karamcharis will monitor
the implementation of this act and advise central & state
govt. for effective implementation of the act and to take
suo-moto notice of matter relating to non-implementation
of the act (Section 31).
15
16. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Implementing Authorities
16
17. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Outline of the presentation
1.Introduction
2.Research Methodology
3.Law on Manual Scavenging
in India
4.Recent Scenario of Manual
Scavenging in India
5.Concluding Remarks
6.Q & A
17
18. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Recent Scenario of Manual Scavenging
- Safai Karamchari Andolan v/s. Union of India (Writ
petition filed in 2003 decided on March 27, 2014) for
implementation of laws on manual scavenging.
- National Commission of Safai Karamchari reported that
act not being implemented.
- CAG reported that National Scheme for Liberalization and
Rehabilitation of Scavengers and their dependents
(Started in 1992) has failed to achieve its objectives
involving investment more than Rs. 600 crore even after
ten years of implementation. Money was unspent &
underutilized.
18
19. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Recent Scenario of Manual Scavenging
The High Court of Gujarat disposed of a suo-motu public
interest litigation (PIL) with regard to manual
scavenging after directing the state government to
strictly implement the law and take "all necessary steps"
to abolish the practice. The bench also directed the
government to strictly implement the law to abolish the
practice (The New Indian Express).
As per Union Minister of Social Justice “only few states
furnishing information on manual scavenging” (Zee
News).
Madras HC directed state govt. to implement the act in
response of PIL. District level vigilance committee and
state level monitoring committee to be constituted (The
Hindu).
19
20. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Outline of the presentation
1.Introduction
2.Research Methodology
3.Law on Manual Scavenging
in India
4.Recent Scenario of Manual
Scavenging in India
5.Concluding Remarks
6.Q & A
20
21. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Conclusion
- Manual Scavenging still prevalent in India.
- Central & State Govt. have failed to implement the
law on manual scavenging.
- SC & Various HC directing states to implement the
law.
21
22. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Recommendation
- Need high-tech equipments.
- Funds for rehabilitation of manual scavengers.
- Sanitation facilities for citizens.
- Robust strategy for implementing the law of manual
scavengers.
22
23. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Limitations of the study & Future Scope
of study
- Present study is based on secondary data which is
the main limitation of the present research.
- Present study can be carried forward by doing field
survey and collecting primary data which will help in
arriving proper findings
23
24. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Outline of the presentation
1.Introduction
2.Research Methodology
3.Law on Manual Scavenging
in India
4.Recent Scenario of Manual
Scavenging in India
5.Concluding Remarks
6.Q & A
24
26. (C) K L GUPTA(C) K L GUPTA
Richard Abraham (2015), “HC directs strict implementation of law on manual
scavenging”, New Indian Express, February 10, 2015.
Social Inclusion of Manual Scavengers, Report of National Round Table Discussion, New
Delhi, December 21, 2012.
Cleaning Human Waste, Manual Scavenging, Caste and Discrimination in India report
prepared by Human Rights Watch, 2014.
Constitution of India
The Employment of Manual Scavengers and Constructions of Dry Latrines (Prohibition)
Act, 1993
The Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013
National Commission for Safai Karamcharis Act, 1993
The Hindu
Zee News
Sewer men of Mumbai, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWBCsn6pQWc
Manual Scavenging, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWuPn4FkIZ4
References :-
26