Locavore Synthesis Essay

Locavore Movement Research Paper
Americans today seem to believe that the world should join the locavore movement– when one
chooses to primarily eat locally grown or produced products– that has become popular in the past
decade. With joining this movement, many people believe their lives and the community will greatly
improve. While critics defend that this change in lifestyle has shown very small improvements in the
last ten years, supporters of this campaign argue that it benefits the economy, their health, and the
environment.
The largest motivator behind the locavore movement is the impact it has on the wealth of the
nation. Switching to eating more locally grown produce will establish smaller farms (E); therefore,
generating more local jobs (F) to help operate these plantations. With the creation of new jobs, there
will be more consumers able to purchase...show more content...
By eating more foods from community based farms, will reduce pollution and improve the air
quality (A) resulting from semi–trucks delivering fewer shipments. Having less polluted air will
tremendously improve the environment by reducing the greenhouse gases that are emitted. Although
those who oppose this change, claim that consuming home–grown products still can utilize the same
amount of fuel (C). For example, a local farmer who sells fifty apples at a stall fifty miles from his
farm uses the same "amount of fuel per apple" as a foreign company shipping two–thousand apples
over two–thousand miles to a store (C). While this debate is compelling, in the long run, purchasing
and consuming regionally–produced foods will have a greater impact in reducing pollution rather
than solely buying imported foods. This is because companies will not have to import the same
amount of food as often, if everyone joins the campaign by eating locally. Therefore, by switching to
this lifestyle, the environment will notably
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay On Locavores
Imagining a community in 2020 where the majority of the population were Locavores is quite
difficult due to the fact that modern society has expanded and is continuing to grow all the time.
Locavores are people who only eat food within a 100 mile radius.(source g) The idea of being a
locavore is new but slightly unnecessary due to the era of production our society lives on today.
Foods shipped from far places may be lacking the nutrients that any other fruit or vegetable grown in
a farm closer would have. (source B) But the nutritional differences are "marginal", it's not much of a
difference, not enough to affect a person's health anyways. Considering the fast–paced societies
growing today in America, relying on the "high demand" farmers would have to meet, can slow
down the community's economic growth speed. In 2020 the society will...show more content...
Buying locally "supports an area's farmers and, in turn, strengthens the community".(source C)
However, the localization of foods would have a negative effect on farmers who rely on
Americans by reducing demand. The decrease in business for these farmers will cause less crops
to be made because, if 90 percent of your products is no longer being bought, then you're losing
money if you make any more than 10 percent. Another thing food localization will cause is local
businesses outside of these communities, like farmers markets to foreclose, because farmers will
be forced to look for different work. If all the farmers in New Zealand are focusing on supplying the
US than no one is focused on what percent of foods stay locally in New Zealand. Therefore a
major movement towards being a locavore could have a big, negative effect on major food
production across the country. Many jobs will be lost, many families will be homeless, and many
families will split

The Locavore Movement
The Locavore movement is sweeping across the nation in a swirl of excitement and thrill. The
locavore movement encourages members to buy and eat foods locally. This movement (when used
properly), will allow the Nation to cut down GMO intake and maximize our nutrition, lower shipping
cost, and boost our local economies.
Genetically modified foods (GMO) are a necessary part of our nation's ability to keep up with the
required food. They allow us to make food bigger, and last longer in order to enjoy them year round.
However, "food begins to lose nutrition as soon as it is harvested." (Source A). With this information
we may begin to see the danger of keeping foods such as apples for extended periods of time; that
is they lose much of their nutrition. In order to avoid eating non nutritional foods it is imperative
that we eat closer to home. This will allow us to reduce the amounts of GMOs injected to foods by
eating them in season and not needing them to last as long....show more content...
Our sense of Adventure and inability to abstain from new and exotic endeavors has bound us
with a flaxen cord. With each new finding probing us to find more, we fulfill our curiosity. We eat
more food and grow in knowledge. And this is great for mankind, in fact it lead to our nations
foundation. Now, we trade and barter foods grown across the world. This makes it expensive to
ship foods as well as difficult to eat food with less GMOs. And for foods that are only able to grow
in specific climates it leads to "the exploitation of cheap labor." (Source F). Meaning that countries
without minimum wage requirements work long hours with unsubstantial pay. It damages their
economies and communities due to the lack of

Locavore Movement
The locavore movement has become a much larger cause in recent years. People are increasingly
aware of some of the issues pertaining to eating foods grown far away. These issues have banded
some communities together to sacrifice their favorite foods and to begin buying locally grown
foods. These communities are experiencing numerous benefits as a result of their decision to change
their culture and eat locally grown foods. Food that is grown locally is significantly fresher than
what can be found in a supermarket where the "fresh" food is stored for weeks. These foods that
are stored can lose lots of nutritional value quickly, making locally grown foods healthier and
fresher. Professor Marion Nestle said that the 100–mile diet is,

Locavore Research Paper
Today's increasing popularity with becoming a locavore has sky rocketed with the new age of
health nuts. The main issue with becoming a locavore is whether the fresh produce is local.
However, as part of a group that enjoys the luxury of eating fresh food, becoming a locavore should
be the only way of living.
Fresh produce is such an amazing experience, yet many people haven't been blessed to try the crisp
bite of the food. Per (Marser), "food bought at your local farmer's market is often picked 24 hours
prior to your purchase." (Marser) also states that, "Because the produce is handled less, locally
grown fruit does not have to stand up to the rigors of shipping." Meaning the produce is given the
primal amount of time to grow before being

Locavores Pros And Cons
In the world of today, a new form of agriculture is starting to take place called "locavores."
Locavores seek to change the way people eat by only growing and selling produce locally.
However, many problems must be brought up to light before choosing this method as a benefit to
the community. Granted, locavores promise to help the local community by benefiting local
farmers. In doing so, the local farmers get more of a financial advantage leaving in exertion the
destitute people who work for produce companies in foreign countries. As stated in source C, when
small time farmers challenge large companies and win, it takes the work and financial security of
thousands desperate workers. Also stated in source C, buying certain products from local

Locavorism
"Green living" is becoming the way of the future. Everyone will eat fresh, locally sourced foods,
packed with nutrients. GMO free. As more people grab ahold of this trend and spread it around,
shaming those who don't follow in their footsteps, they ignore the negative impacts that could
develop through locavorism.
Buying locally reduces transportation, therefore less carbon emission is released into the air. Does
this not mean that locavorism could save the planet? Well it actually may not according to James
McWilliams, a writer on Forbes.com. McWilliams says, "factors other than shipping far outweigh the
energy it takes to transport food...transportation accounts for only 11% of food's carbon footprint."
McWilliams regards things such as water usage, fertilizer types, processing methods and packaging
techniques to prove that buying fresher foods is not always the right idea. Farms and companies that
are said to be 'green' and 'better for the planet' could actually be harming the planet much more than
they thought.
McWilliams also references the issue of the economy, stating, "it also hurts farmers in other parts of
the world. The U.K. buys... green beans from Kenya... threatens the livelihood of 1.5 million
sub–Saharan farmers." Buying strictly locally grown foods will put large...show more content...
In an excerpt from a book about the 100 mile diet by Alisa Smith and J.B. McKinnon, the authors
speak to professor Marion Nestle, the former chair of nutrition, food studies, and public health at
New York university, about people's concerns about the foods they eat. Nestle says, "it is [not]
necessary to eat locally to be healthy... people are not nutrient–deprived." The largest fight for eating
locally is the health benefits, yet eating locally does not mean a person is less healthy and/or
nutrient–deprived than that of a locavore

Analysis Of The Locavore Movement
People who hold nutrition and locally grown foods and other products on a prestigious level are
known as locavores. The locavore movement has risen over the past ten years to improve the
economy and nurishment within one's local area. As Jennifer Maiser explains in Source A, a study
found that eating locally does in fact improve the economic value of that area. An organization in
London conducted a study that proved the practice of a locavore doubled their income, and kept
money from leaving the community to be spent elsewhere. Highlighted in Source E, Pallavi Gogoi
stated, "Small farmers will be able to get up to 75% of their organic certification costs
reimbursed...and obtain crop insurance," which shows that it is very beneficial

Research Paper On Locavore
A locavore is a character who desires to eat locally to empower a community, in addition, to
achieve healthy systems except locavores fail to remember one crucial group, the rest of Earth.
Locavores who believe they are improving Earth are actually harming it even greater than before.
Furthermore, not only is it harmful to mother Earth, but even the locavores themselves. Locavores
assume they decide to eat locally; however, in reality, locavores are forced to eat locally as no choice
is available. Understand locavores as well as their local food movements as it is seen superb to
every other eye; however, if carefully inspected, it is only an idea that will cause misconduct.
To begin this rant a locavore is one who limits themselves, a negative...show more content...
No matter, to restate, the entire world is affected if a locavore movement is to begin in a
community. See the problem is, when people try to include themselves in the community they start
to believe they are actually helping. For example, a locavore shops at a local farm to support him
and him only. What about other farmers who had the same dream, industry businesses that formed
to produce food for the people. All around the world people should realize how important everyone
is. Everyone wants to have a role in life no matter what it is, but if only worried about one's
community then this is seen as selfish act only to improve one's reputation. "Locavores argue that
buying local food supports an area's farmers and, in turn, strengthens the community (McWilliams,
Source C)." McWilliams continues to argue that it does in fact hurt other farmers around the world,
how can one be satisfied when another farmer could be struggling all because of a locavore
movement. One idea or movement that is community based should not be enough to take effect on
the rest of the

Synthesis Essay: The Locavore Movement
I picked up a sweet, fresh, bright red apple at the farmer's market. The tangy smell of the apple
makes me hungry, knowing I'm getting the freshest and most nutritious apple. Though is it really
any different from the apple grown 300 miles away? The locavores are people who decided to eat
locally grown produce, this has become known as the locavore movement and is quickly becoming
widespread among more people. But, is a locavore movement really needed? The fact is, there is no
difference between local produce and produce that was grown hundreds of miles away. The locavore
movement may not make a huge difference.
A main argument for eating locally grown produce is that, it has more nutrients than store bought
food. Based on source A, the longer the produce has been stored the more the nutritional value goes
down, "... the nutritional value ... declines with time"(source A). Though, the longer the produce sits
does not affect the nutritional value, this issue is just a red herring. Nutrition isn't a factor that can
be considered when people talk about the locavore movement, " ... at New York University, she
waved away the nutrition issue as a red herring"(source B). The nutritional difference will be so
small that it won't make a difference no matter how someone looks at it, this...show more content...
Ordinarily, transport is said to be affecting the environment, but in reality the carbon footprint
doesn't make enough of an impact to make a difference, " ... transportation accounts for only 11%
of food's carbon footprint."(source C). Continually , the environment someone may live doesn't
provide lots of the produce they may need. If someone lives in Hawaii, they could get more fresh
fruit than someone who lives in Alaska, as seen in source G. With this implication to keep in mind,
at some point someone would need to go to the store to get some produce, it isn't all offered and
grown where they

Benefits Of The Locavore Movement
When it comes to the topic of eating locally grown foods, most of us will readily agree that it is
beneficial. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of whether the locavores
movement is necessary for a community. Whereas some are convinced that the locavore movement
holds more cons, others maintain that the pros heavily outweigh the cons. Although the movement
may come across some troubling difficulties, the locavore movement has many positive implications
on the community.
The locavore movement has many health and local economy benefits. Health benefits come from
buying locally; by doing this foods have a higher nutrition content (Source A). Because this food was
picked just a day before buying, any produce will

Write An Essay On Locavore
The smell of fresh vegetables and fruit, the vibrant colors from every direction you look, and the
friendly smiles that come from the question, "Would you like to try one?" Yes, this is farmer's
market many people attend to buy the foods they eat at home. But why? The locavore movement, a
trend for people to eat locally grown products, can have many benefits when looking into the
environment around you and personal nutrition. In our busy lives, the environment is probably one of
the last problems on our mind. But, it is very important because the environment's health affects
everyone including future generations. In source A, it quotes "eating local is better for air quality
and pollution than eating organic." When looking into transportation,

Being a locavore is a very healthy lifestyle that is inhabited by human who eat locally grown or
produced products. The locavore movement has created notice to other local towns that eating
locally produced food can preserve your health and increase the town's economy. Eating at a local
farmers market can ensure the local economy by providing income towards those farmers that
produce these foods. The locavore movement is becoming big in present day, and there are many
ways that this movement can have a positive impact on a town, for example, the economy will
increase, fresher food that doesn't travel, and with purchases on local produces provide much needed
jobs. The locavore movement is a healthy lifestyle that is well adapted to the human diet that can
preserve the environment and make the common rural citizen help out the community....show more
content...
Local small towns need as much support from the community to stay functioning, and running.
With being a locavore it provides the economy of these small towns to increase due to funds going
to the farmers, and stores that sell these products. Locally owned businesses rely on the community
to purchase their products, and if these local shops aren't receiving income than these shops can't
stay in business. The locavore movement is important for rural economies, and better for air
quality. "A dollar spent locally generates twice as much income for the local economy" (Source A)
Jennifer Maiser refers to the locavore movement as beneficial to food that's locally grown. The
community provides funds for towns suffering and even eating locally grown food is healthier and
has much more of a variety than shipped

Essay On The Locavore Movement
The locavore movement is a powerful and extremely healthy movement; it cuts down on
transportation, supports a town's economy, and helps encourage society to consume healthier foods.
It is a powerful movement that would be great to the community in many ways. It would not just
benefit some people in the community but everybody individually. It is also an amazing way to
bring the people in the community together. The locavore movement encourages people in towns to
consume more locally grown food, by society consuming locally grown food transportation is cut
down which helps better the environment. Since locally grown food is produce that is cultivated in
the community transportation is down to a minimum which is a blessing for the environment. "
Eating local is better for air quality and pollution than eating organic. " ( Source A ) less
transportation use helps lessen the pollution in the air which in turn helps provide the community
with cleaner fresher air. " The move towards local food for all its trendiness highlights one of the
problematic pieces of the modern food economy : the increasing reliance on foods shipped halfway
round the world. " ( Source E ) The...show more content...
Local farmers markets give back to the community from the income that is made from selling
produce which helps boost the community's economy. " Eating local means more for the local
economy. " ( Source A ) Purchasing local foods from the community are a spectacular way to
provide for a community's economy. " According to a study by the New Economics Foundation in
London a dollar spent locally generates twice as much income for the local economy. " ( Source A )
Local food markets are better for the economy because the income would go to the community
unlike a big chain supermarket where the income made in that establishment would go to a corporate
office, none of the income would be put towards the

Locavore Synthesis Essay
Locavores consume only locally grown foods in an effort to reduce their carbon footprints and lose
weight, among other reasons. The popularity of locavorism has grown dramatically over the last
decade, and its merits are extolled by scientists and ordinary consumers alike. The locavore
movement seems to be indisputably beneficial to the environment, the economy, and to consumer
health, yet close examination of its common tenets reveals issues which should be taken into account
before beginning a locavore diet. Locavorism's environmental benefits are referenced frequently by
its supporters . "Food miles" – the distance your food has traveled before it reaches your plate – are
a commonly used term. Because of the substantial amount of fuel...show more content...
Locavores argue that food travelling long distances before being consumed declines in nutrition as
antioxidants and nutrients decay – meaning that food which travels less distance (and is therefore
eaten faster) is better for your health. However, Marion Nestle (as quoted by Alisa Smith and J.B.
McKinnon) thinks that the nutrition argument isn't based in science. According to her, "a person
making smart choices from the global megamart can easily meet all the body's needs", and "there
will be nutritional differences, but they'll be marginal" (Source B). It's clearly not unhealthy to eat
locally grown foods, and they may even be better for your health. However, the benefits of eating
freshly picked food may not be as great as locavores claim they are. Locavorism has both strong
supporters and vehement opposers, as most trends do. Overall, eating locally isn't a bad idea: it can
connect you with community farmers and help you to choose healthier meals. However – as with all
topics – it isn't all black and white. Many common locavorism arguments aren't grounded in science,
and people exalt it while blindly ignoring the aforementioned issues. People considering locavorism
should ensure that they consider the negatives before beginning a locavore

Locavore Analysis
Locavores are idealistic people who put efforts into improving the local economy. Slowly, the world
begins to understand the meaning behind locavore strategies of striving for optimal health and
nutrition. Although locavores have a positive intention of leading a more sustainable and healthy
food system, they often misguide or misinform others, doing more harm than good. Locally grown
produce is guaranteed to preserve fresh produce and maximum nutritional values, however, on the
other hand, Americans are not "nutrient–deprived" (B). Professor Marion Nestle, also a former chair
of nutrition, assures that a 100–mile diet is "almost certainly more nutritious than what the average
American [is] eating. That doesn't mean it is necessary to eat...show more content...
According to an analysis by Rich Pirog of the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture,
"transportation accounts for only 11% of food's carbon footprint." Forbes also notes that it "is not
food miles but apples per gallon," implying that transportation is not the primary cause of greenhouse
gasses (C). A chart excerpted from an environmental magazine visualizes the total greenhouse gas
emission from factory products, measuring the climate impact in metric tons of CO2 per
household–year due to transportation, production, and wholesale. Of all products, production
showed to be most harmful towards the environment, releasing over five times more emission than
that of transportation and wholesale/retail. Some might again argue that the problem is not the
"where" or "how," but "what is being made." Referring back to the graph, red meat proves to emit
much more greenhouse gas than any other product (D). Another solution can be to cut down on red
meat or become a hearty vegan. Locavores strongly believe in buying local produce to decrease
pollution; one way or another, distance is the least of our problems – it is all about how the products
are

Locavores Research Paper
Locavores: Beneficial or harmful? Locavores are a group of people who prefer to consume
locally grown products and they get these products usually within a 100 mile radius from home.
The main idea of this local movement is to avoid consuming products that are moved a long
distance from the farm to the market. This a great movement for us the consumers because we
know what we're eating and how it was produced, in other words it has many beneficial health
factors. Subsequently, there is always two sides to every coin. The bad side of conventional
farming methods used by corporate farmers that result in the shipping of foods long distances to
major grocery stores. Big farm operations require energy at many points – petrochemicals and energy
are

Rhetorical Analysis: The Locavore's Dilemma
Eating food produced within a hundred–mile radius has never been a prominent concern historically,
though there has been a recent increase in this trend. Those that are rigorously set on this new
ideology are being labeled "locavores". Christophe Pelletier, being a proficient individual on the
topic of food production had an educated opinion on the locavore's predicted way of life.
Pelletier's, "The Locavore's Dilemma", provides multiple examples to support his belief that
informing every resident of the carbon footprint their food contains would realistically carryout the
locavore's ideology to a more viable agriculture. His blog post on this ideology goes into depth about
the physical and economical destruction they would provoke. This would include: the possibility of
famine, lack of needed nutritional supplements,...show more content...
He uses small phrases that can be considered humorous throughout the more serious parts of his
writing to establish character. This establishment of character along with applying personal
experience creates a strong development of trustworthiness between him and his audience. When
Pelletier addresses the loss of coffee, tea, and beer–known treasures for the British Columbia
population–he is able to utilize the lighthearted remark "at least, there is no shortage of water"
(Pelletier p.703). As he takes a look beyond food itself, the hundred–mile radius would begin to
affect many other agricultural products. Cotton, wool, and even the manufacturing of cars would
soon fade away. For Pelletier's readers that are just beginning to think abroad the restrictions of only
local food sources; it is quite an eye opener. He uses another frivolous response, "the 100–mile rule
will solve traffic problems" to include a passively positive outlook on what local locavores should
expect to experience (Pelletier

Locavore Movement
The locavore movement has become more popular and has gained more attention in the recent
years. Social and media attention usually display locavorism as an idealistic lifestyle, "Buy local,
shrink the distance food travels, save the planet."(Source C). However, there are some negative
issues and implications with the locavore movement. One of the issues of the locavore movement is
the mile range. According to both source B and source G, the food in a locavore's diet should come
from within a 100 mile radius. This mile radius could possibly be an issue for people living in
more urbanized cities like Houston, New York City, and Los Angeles. In cities like these, the mile
range would make it harder for people to participate

Locavores Persuasive Essay
Locavores are people who have decided to eat locally grown or produced products. The more people
discuss locavores, the more support local farms get from surrounding communities. Placing the local
farms closer in proximity with one another will minimize the amount of pollution in the air due to
harmful chemicals secreted through transportation. Produce from local farms contain less
contamination from chemicals that try to kill pesticides. Local farms have organic certifications
refurbishments, which are requirements that have to be met in order to sell organic produce, such as
using the correct materials approved by the USDA and knowing what materials are not approved.
From these positive initiatives conducted to help improve one's health and

Locavore Synthesis Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Custom Paper Services

More from Custom Paper Services (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Locavore Synthesis Essay