Les outils d’evaluation
Daniel Cherqui – Andrea Laurenzi
Stone, Am J Surg 1969
Truant, JACS 2007
• RLV-BWR was more relevant than RLV-TLV in predicting postoperative course after
right trisectionectomy
• Patients with an anticipated RLV < 0,5% of the body weight were at risk of hepatic
dysfunction
• No deaths in the group of patients with RLV/BWR >0,5%
Remnant liver volume assessment
Truant, World J Surg 2015
Shin, JGIS 2007
29 patients pour CHC uninodulaire Child A
Only hepatic venous pressure gradient > 10 mmHg was significant
in multivariate analysis for decompensated cirrhosis after hepat.
Risk factor in univariate analysis
Bilirubin rate
Urea rate
Rate of platelet
ICG Clearence
Hepatic venous pressure gradiant,
1996
Décompensation de la cirrhose : Persistance d’une ascite à 3 mois
Cucchetti, J Hep 2016
Makuuchi, Semin Surg Oncol 1993
Ascites
None or controlled Not controlled
ICGR15 Limited resection Enucleation Not indicated for hepatectomy
Trisectorectomy
bisectorectomy
Left-sided
hepatectomy
Right-sided
sectoriectomy
Segmentectomy Limited resection Enucleation
Normal 1.1 – 1.5 mg/dL 1.6 – 1.9 mg/dL > 2.0 mg/dL
Total bilirubin level
Normal 10% - 19% 30% - 39% > 40%20% - 29%
Adapter la chirurgie hépatique à la
fonction…
Survivors (n = 113) Non-survivors (n = 14) P *
All ICG retention at 15 min (%) 11 (3 - 50) 18 (4 - 29) 0.008
Aminopyrine breath test (%) 4-4 (1.3 - 9.6) 4.3 (2.8 – 8.3) 0.69
Amino acid clearance test (1 m-2 min-1) 0.21(1.7 to 4.3) 0.15 (-0.2 to 0.9) 0.35
Albumin (g l-1) 42 (31 - 53) 41 (29 - 46) 0.40
Total bilirubin (µmol l-1) 9 (3 - 70) 14 (7 - 32) 0.05
Aspartate aminotransferase (units l-1) 59 (17 - 365) 97 (39 - 340) 0.02
Alanine aminotransferase (units l-1) 53 (9 - 480) 53 (21 - 322) 0.90
0
15
35
[IGC]mg%
Survivors
Distribution of indocyanine green (ICG) retention at
? in for survivors and patients who died in hospital
Non-survivors
5
25
40
10
20
45
30
 127 hepatectomies dont 91 Majeures
 Child A (n=121) / Child B (n=6)
 Mortalité Hospitalière : 14/127 (11%)
 Valeur seuil d’ICG à 15 minutes
15% pour les Hep. Maj
23% pour les Hep. Min.
Lau, BJS 1997
90 pts including including 17 major hep. : 30% of liver decompensation (20% ascite)
Cescon, Ann Surg 2012
> 16 kpA: Ascite and/or POLF
Cescon, Ann Surg 2012
Correlation is linear…
YesNo
PosthepatectomyPVP(mmHg)
22.5 mmHg
15 mmHg
P < 0.001
Liver failure « 50-50 » criteria
Portal pressure after major liver resection
An independent predictor of liver failure and mortality
after major resection (N = 277) in humans1
Allard, Ann Surg 2013
Comment évaluer la réserve fonctionnelle: les autres
paramètres
Scintigraphie hépatique
De Graaf, J Nucl Med 2010

Les outils d'évaluation ( Volumetries, Pressions) - Dr Andrea Laurenzi - Pr Daniel Cherqui

  • 1.
    Les outils d’evaluation DanielCherqui – Andrea Laurenzi
  • 2.
    Stone, Am JSurg 1969
  • 3.
    Truant, JACS 2007 •RLV-BWR was more relevant than RLV-TLV in predicting postoperative course after right trisectionectomy • Patients with an anticipated RLV < 0,5% of the body weight were at risk of hepatic dysfunction • No deaths in the group of patients with RLV/BWR >0,5%
  • 4.
    Remnant liver volumeassessment Truant, World J Surg 2015
  • 5.
  • 6.
    29 patients pourCHC uninodulaire Child A Only hepatic venous pressure gradient > 10 mmHg was significant in multivariate analysis for decompensated cirrhosis after hepat. Risk factor in univariate analysis Bilirubin rate Urea rate Rate of platelet ICG Clearence Hepatic venous pressure gradiant, 1996 Décompensation de la cirrhose : Persistance d’une ascite à 3 mois
  • 7.
  • 8.
    Makuuchi, Semin SurgOncol 1993 Ascites None or controlled Not controlled ICGR15 Limited resection Enucleation Not indicated for hepatectomy Trisectorectomy bisectorectomy Left-sided hepatectomy Right-sided sectoriectomy Segmentectomy Limited resection Enucleation Normal 1.1 – 1.5 mg/dL 1.6 – 1.9 mg/dL > 2.0 mg/dL Total bilirubin level Normal 10% - 19% 30% - 39% > 40%20% - 29% Adapter la chirurgie hépatique à la fonction…
  • 9.
    Survivors (n =113) Non-survivors (n = 14) P * All ICG retention at 15 min (%) 11 (3 - 50) 18 (4 - 29) 0.008 Aminopyrine breath test (%) 4-4 (1.3 - 9.6) 4.3 (2.8 – 8.3) 0.69 Amino acid clearance test (1 m-2 min-1) 0.21(1.7 to 4.3) 0.15 (-0.2 to 0.9) 0.35 Albumin (g l-1) 42 (31 - 53) 41 (29 - 46) 0.40 Total bilirubin (µmol l-1) 9 (3 - 70) 14 (7 - 32) 0.05 Aspartate aminotransferase (units l-1) 59 (17 - 365) 97 (39 - 340) 0.02 Alanine aminotransferase (units l-1) 53 (9 - 480) 53 (21 - 322) 0.90 0 15 35 [IGC]mg% Survivors Distribution of indocyanine green (ICG) retention at ? in for survivors and patients who died in hospital Non-survivors 5 25 40 10 20 45 30  127 hepatectomies dont 91 Majeures  Child A (n=121) / Child B (n=6)  Mortalité Hospitalière : 14/127 (11%)  Valeur seuil d’ICG à 15 minutes 15% pour les Hep. Maj 23% pour les Hep. Min. Lau, BJS 1997
  • 10.
    90 pts includingincluding 17 major hep. : 30% of liver decompensation (20% ascite) Cescon, Ann Surg 2012
  • 11.
    > 16 kpA:Ascite and/or POLF Cescon, Ann Surg 2012
  • 12.
    Correlation is linear… YesNo PosthepatectomyPVP(mmHg) 22.5mmHg 15 mmHg P < 0.001 Liver failure « 50-50 » criteria Portal pressure after major liver resection An independent predictor of liver failure and mortality after major resection (N = 277) in humans1 Allard, Ann Surg 2013
  • 13.
    Comment évaluer laréserve fonctionnelle: les autres paramètres Scintigraphie hépatique De Graaf, J Nucl Med 2010