LEADERSHIP: WHERE ARE WE AT? A Curriculum Committee presentation
Why report of Leadership? An  identified   area  for Professional Development Seeking to lead, rather than just manage  Departments
RESEARCH ON SCHOOL LEADERSHIP “ Current Issues in Educational Leadership” Neil Cranston, Lisa Ehrich and Leanne Morton (2007) (a recent article published in  The Australian Educational Leader , ACEL, Vol 29, No. 2) “ Quality Teaching and School Leadership: A Scan of Research Findings”   NIQTSL, Canberra Louise Watson (2005)
IMPACT ON STUDENT OUTCOMES Leadership is second only to quality teaching A probable understatement of the impact Leadership is associated with   “patterns of influence in social interaction”   (Ingvarson, 2006, p.27).
CURRENT ISSUES IN EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Theme 1:  A critique of the competency approach To simplistic Reductionist Not future orientated A-contextual
Understanding of emerging developments Use to engage school community Capacity to work with different groups Effective leadership in times of change and challenge Advocacy role for community Theme 2:  Need to contextualise leadership thinking
Human/finance and resources Expectations, policies, pedagogies Legislation and legal External relations Accountability requirements Theme 3: Management is important
Student learning and development is the fundamental focus Critically reflective, life-long learner Theory-practice links Leaders of learning Formal/informal P.D The learner-centred school  (for all) Theme 4:  Educational leadership is about learning
Theme 5:   Educational leadership is a purposeful, values-driven activity Aware of own values/beliefs/principles School values/beliefs/principles School community service and social responsibilities Learning-centred focus Tolerance Inclusiveness Compassion Equity, social justice, fairness Whole-person development Empowerment Ethics/ethical behaviour Key Values include:
Empowerment Working with/through others Working in non-hierarchical, trusting and mutual respective ways Know  staff Communication Theme 6:  Educational leadership as distributed activity
Interpersonal skills Developing relationships Manage micro-politics Theme 7:   Educational leadership as a relational activity
Literature awash with lists of knowledge, skills, attitudes and dispositions The more notable that have emerged in recent years are : Theme 8:   Leadership qualities and capabilities
Theme 8:   Leadership qualities and capabilities Modeling the way Challenge and risk taking Influencing others Optimism and confidence Adaptable and responsive Intuition Commitment Passion
Theme 8:   Leadership qualities and capabilities Advocacy Creative and innovative Personal responsibility Courage Relational capabilities Resilience Self-confidence Tough-mindedness
Theme 8:   Leadership qualities and capabilities Compassion and fairness Integrity Political and legal astuteness Acting ethically Micro-political astuteness Managing diversity Visioning Leading and managing change
REFLECTION!! HOW DO WE MEASURE UP?
Responding to local/national demands that conflict? Acting as “leader” while empowering others? Work/life balance Theme 9:   Paradoxes and tensions inherent in Educational leadership
Future orientated while managing the “here and now?” Professional learning in face of competing demands Effective allocation of limited resources Theme 9:  Paradoxes and tensions inherent in Educational leadership
MODELS OF SCHOOL LEADERSHIP INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP DISTRIBUTED LEADERSHIP
1. INSTRUCTIONAL  LEADERSHIP Leadership in teaching and learning to improve student outcomes (Watson, 2005, p.67)
Defining  a School  Mission   (or Strategy) Managing  the Instructional Program  (or Structure) Promoting  a Positive Learning  Climate  (or Culture) There are 3 Dimensions:
Five attributes were identified: Leadership   Vision Focus on  school level activities Importance   of   school culture Engagement  of teachers “ Dedication” to  needs of students In Australian context
2. TRANSFORMATINAL LEADERSHIP Definition: The use of facilitative  powers to construct strong cultures that empower individuals, rather than simply exercising authority over them. INFLUENCE, NOT AUTHORITY
Liethwood et al (1996): Six dimensions of Transformational Leadership Building  School  Vision  and Goals Providing  intellectual stimulation Offering  individualised  support Symbolising  professional practices and values Demonstrating  high performance expectations Developing   structures  to foster  participation in school decisions
3. DISTRIBUTED LEADERSHIP A set of functions distributed amongst community members Models look at: Forms or functions  of leadership Members Processes  that distribute leadership
A collective activity The spanning of task, responsibilities and power Expert, not hierarchical authority Three common understandings of D.L:
Recent Research TEACHER LEADERSHIP  (Crowther et al – USQ) Teachers leaders should: Convey  a better world Strive  for  authenticity  in teaching, learning and assessment Facilitate   communities of learning Confront barriers  to school  culture  and  structures Translate  ideas into  sustainable systems of action Nurture  a  culture of success
Recent Research “ ACTIVE PROFESSIONALISM” (Sachs. 2000) Broad principles are: Inclusiveness Collective/collaborative  action Effective communication  of aims, expectations, etc Recognition of expertise of all An environment of trust and mutual respect Being responsive  and  responsible Acting  with passion Experiencing  pleasure and fun
REFLECTION!! WHAT  STYLE  DO I EMPLOY ?
WHAT DOES EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP LOOK LIKE?
Effective Leadership was  invariably indirect School goals  the most consistent variable Hallenger/Heck found:
Providing  Direction Exercising  Influence (influencing others to achieve the direction) Leithwood’s two generic functions:
Leadership is a  Social Concept Leadership involves  Purpose and Direction Leaders exercise  Influence Leadership is a  Function Leadership is  Context Specific Five Broad Characteristics of Successful School Leadership
REFLECTION!! What have you identified as  the common “elements”  in each of the three models thus far?
WHAT DO EFFECTIVE LEADERS DO?
SETTING   DIRECTION (Visionary/Strategic) Clear goals Owned  by the people Fostering a  shared sense of purpose “ Shared Vision”  more likely to motivate Specific practices include: Identifying and articulating a  vision Fostering the acceptance of  group goals Creating  high performance expectations
DEVELOPING PEOPLE (Culture) Support and sustain  teacher/student performance Depends on  knowledge of teaching and learning ( Instructional Leadership   aspect ) Skills in  building relationships  in social context Specific practices include: Providing  Intellectual stimulation Providing  individualised support Empowering others  to make decisions
REDESIGNING THE ORGANISATION  (Structural) Assumed schools need to change  to meet new challenges Must be  willing to change the status quo Capable of implementing  school reform Specific practices include: Strengthening the  school culture Modifying  organisational structures Building  collaborative practices
A Summary then … Vision  is the most important Must be a  shared vision Vision linked to  cultural/structural  aspects REALITY : all three need to develop in concert
STANDARDS OF SCHOOL LEADERSHIP Many overseas (UK, US, Scotland, Dutch) Professional organisations in Australia: APAPDC , ACEL, APC, Cath. Ed. (Qld, Sydney) Governments ( WA , SA, NSW) Nationally:  Teaching Australia
DEVELOPING LEADERSHIP Developed through authentic task and opportunities  for effective collaborative decision making Principles  for developing such tasks:
Tasks should: Be authentic  and, thus, complex Allow for  variety of forms of leadership practice Be   open ended Be   fair Provide   opportunity and encouragement of analysis and reflection Have Research  based knowledge Encourage  leaders to exemplify good practice
CONCLUSION SUMMARY Current research centred on  Transformational and Distributed Leadership Broad characteristics: A social concept Purpose and direction Exercising influence Is a function Context specific
CONCLUSION SUMMARY (Cont’d) SETTING DIRECTION DEVELOPING PEOPLE REDESIGNING THE ORGANISAION
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? Can we “lead” our own departments? A new role/model for HOD’s at TGS? (Job design issues) Increased Leadership for HOD’s? (through practical, authentic, dec.mak. tasks)
ATTACHMENTS Responsibilities of Balanced Leadership 10 Proposition for Transforming Learning The  Framework  (with self reflection guide) AAPDC’s Educational Leadership Model
ARTICLES “ The only way to go – shared leadership” “ Leadership tips for HOD’s” “ Strong leaders build great teams”
FURTHER SOURCES OF INFORMATION Australian Principals Association Professional Development Council:   http:// www.apapdc.edu.au / Australian Council for Educational Leaders: http:// www.acel.org.au /
FURTHER SOURCES OF INFORMATION Teaching Australia:   http://www.teachingaustralia.edu.au/ta/go Mind Tools:   http:// www.mindtools.com/pages/main/newMN_LDR.htm Leadership Survival Guide:   http://resources.sai-iowa.org/index.html
FURTHER SOURCES OF INFORMATION Articles Previously supplied include: “ Building Collaboration” “ HR management and development: a framework for school subject departments” Others  can be supplied from my own collection
P.D. OPPORTUNITIES ISQ 2007 State Conference ,  25-27 July 2007 (Surfers Paradise) Directions for Catholic Educational Leadership in the 21st Century,  29 July – 1 August 2007 (Sydney) “ The Leadership Challenge,”  The 2007 Research Conference of the ACER, 12-14 August 2007, (Melbourne) “ New Imagery for Schools and Schooling: challenge, creating and connecting”  International Conference of  ASCD and ACEL, 10-12 October 2007, (Sydney)

Leadership: Whare are we at?

  • 1.
    LEADERSHIP: WHERE AREWE AT? A Curriculum Committee presentation
  • 2.
    Why report ofLeadership? An identified area for Professional Development Seeking to lead, rather than just manage Departments
  • 3.
    RESEARCH ON SCHOOLLEADERSHIP “ Current Issues in Educational Leadership” Neil Cranston, Lisa Ehrich and Leanne Morton (2007) (a recent article published in The Australian Educational Leader , ACEL, Vol 29, No. 2) “ Quality Teaching and School Leadership: A Scan of Research Findings” NIQTSL, Canberra Louise Watson (2005)
  • 4.
    IMPACT ON STUDENTOUTCOMES Leadership is second only to quality teaching A probable understatement of the impact Leadership is associated with “patterns of influence in social interaction” (Ingvarson, 2006, p.27).
  • 5.
    CURRENT ISSUES INEDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
  • 6.
    Theme 1: A critique of the competency approach To simplistic Reductionist Not future orientated A-contextual
  • 7.
    Understanding of emergingdevelopments Use to engage school community Capacity to work with different groups Effective leadership in times of change and challenge Advocacy role for community Theme 2: Need to contextualise leadership thinking
  • 8.
    Human/finance and resourcesExpectations, policies, pedagogies Legislation and legal External relations Accountability requirements Theme 3: Management is important
  • 9.
    Student learning anddevelopment is the fundamental focus Critically reflective, life-long learner Theory-practice links Leaders of learning Formal/informal P.D The learner-centred school (for all) Theme 4: Educational leadership is about learning
  • 10.
    Theme 5: Educational leadership is a purposeful, values-driven activity Aware of own values/beliefs/principles School values/beliefs/principles School community service and social responsibilities Learning-centred focus Tolerance Inclusiveness Compassion Equity, social justice, fairness Whole-person development Empowerment Ethics/ethical behaviour Key Values include:
  • 11.
    Empowerment Working with/throughothers Working in non-hierarchical, trusting and mutual respective ways Know staff Communication Theme 6: Educational leadership as distributed activity
  • 12.
    Interpersonal skills Developingrelationships Manage micro-politics Theme 7: Educational leadership as a relational activity
  • 13.
    Literature awash withlists of knowledge, skills, attitudes and dispositions The more notable that have emerged in recent years are : Theme 8: Leadership qualities and capabilities
  • 14.
    Theme 8: Leadership qualities and capabilities Modeling the way Challenge and risk taking Influencing others Optimism and confidence Adaptable and responsive Intuition Commitment Passion
  • 15.
    Theme 8: Leadership qualities and capabilities Advocacy Creative and innovative Personal responsibility Courage Relational capabilities Resilience Self-confidence Tough-mindedness
  • 16.
    Theme 8: Leadership qualities and capabilities Compassion and fairness Integrity Political and legal astuteness Acting ethically Micro-political astuteness Managing diversity Visioning Leading and managing change
  • 17.
    REFLECTION!! HOW DOWE MEASURE UP?
  • 18.
    Responding to local/nationaldemands that conflict? Acting as “leader” while empowering others? Work/life balance Theme 9: Paradoxes and tensions inherent in Educational leadership
  • 19.
    Future orientated whilemanaging the “here and now?” Professional learning in face of competing demands Effective allocation of limited resources Theme 9: Paradoxes and tensions inherent in Educational leadership
  • 20.
    MODELS OF SCHOOLLEADERSHIP INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP DISTRIBUTED LEADERSHIP
  • 21.
    1. INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Leadership in teaching and learning to improve student outcomes (Watson, 2005, p.67)
  • 22.
    Defining aSchool Mission (or Strategy) Managing the Instructional Program (or Structure) Promoting a Positive Learning Climate (or Culture) There are 3 Dimensions:
  • 23.
    Five attributes wereidentified: Leadership Vision Focus on school level activities Importance of school culture Engagement of teachers “ Dedication” to needs of students In Australian context
  • 24.
    2. TRANSFORMATINAL LEADERSHIPDefinition: The use of facilitative powers to construct strong cultures that empower individuals, rather than simply exercising authority over them. INFLUENCE, NOT AUTHORITY
  • 25.
    Liethwood et al(1996): Six dimensions of Transformational Leadership Building School Vision and Goals Providing intellectual stimulation Offering individualised support Symbolising professional practices and values Demonstrating high performance expectations Developing structures to foster participation in school decisions
  • 26.
    3. DISTRIBUTED LEADERSHIPA set of functions distributed amongst community members Models look at: Forms or functions of leadership Members Processes that distribute leadership
  • 27.
    A collective activityThe spanning of task, responsibilities and power Expert, not hierarchical authority Three common understandings of D.L:
  • 28.
    Recent Research TEACHERLEADERSHIP (Crowther et al – USQ) Teachers leaders should: Convey a better world Strive for authenticity in teaching, learning and assessment Facilitate communities of learning Confront barriers to school culture and structures Translate ideas into sustainable systems of action Nurture a culture of success
  • 29.
    Recent Research “ACTIVE PROFESSIONALISM” (Sachs. 2000) Broad principles are: Inclusiveness Collective/collaborative action Effective communication of aims, expectations, etc Recognition of expertise of all An environment of trust and mutual respect Being responsive and responsible Acting with passion Experiencing pleasure and fun
  • 30.
    REFLECTION!! WHAT STYLE DO I EMPLOY ?
  • 31.
    WHAT DOES EFFECTIVELEADERSHIP LOOK LIKE?
  • 32.
    Effective Leadership was invariably indirect School goals the most consistent variable Hallenger/Heck found:
  • 33.
    Providing DirectionExercising Influence (influencing others to achieve the direction) Leithwood’s two generic functions:
  • 34.
    Leadership is a Social Concept Leadership involves Purpose and Direction Leaders exercise Influence Leadership is a Function Leadership is Context Specific Five Broad Characteristics of Successful School Leadership
  • 35.
    REFLECTION!! What haveyou identified as the common “elements” in each of the three models thus far?
  • 36.
    WHAT DO EFFECTIVELEADERS DO?
  • 37.
    SETTING DIRECTION (Visionary/Strategic) Clear goals Owned by the people Fostering a shared sense of purpose “ Shared Vision” more likely to motivate Specific practices include: Identifying and articulating a vision Fostering the acceptance of group goals Creating high performance expectations
  • 38.
    DEVELOPING PEOPLE (Culture)Support and sustain teacher/student performance Depends on knowledge of teaching and learning ( Instructional Leadership aspect ) Skills in building relationships in social context Specific practices include: Providing Intellectual stimulation Providing individualised support Empowering others to make decisions
  • 39.
    REDESIGNING THE ORGANISATION (Structural) Assumed schools need to change to meet new challenges Must be willing to change the status quo Capable of implementing school reform Specific practices include: Strengthening the school culture Modifying organisational structures Building collaborative practices
  • 40.
    A Summary then… Vision is the most important Must be a shared vision Vision linked to cultural/structural aspects REALITY : all three need to develop in concert
  • 41.
    STANDARDS OF SCHOOLLEADERSHIP Many overseas (UK, US, Scotland, Dutch) Professional organisations in Australia: APAPDC , ACEL, APC, Cath. Ed. (Qld, Sydney) Governments ( WA , SA, NSW) Nationally: Teaching Australia
  • 42.
    DEVELOPING LEADERSHIP Developedthrough authentic task and opportunities for effective collaborative decision making Principles for developing such tasks:
  • 43.
    Tasks should: Beauthentic and, thus, complex Allow for variety of forms of leadership practice Be open ended Be fair Provide opportunity and encouragement of analysis and reflection Have Research based knowledge Encourage leaders to exemplify good practice
  • 44.
    CONCLUSION SUMMARY Currentresearch centred on Transformational and Distributed Leadership Broad characteristics: A social concept Purpose and direction Exercising influence Is a function Context specific
  • 45.
    CONCLUSION SUMMARY (Cont’d)SETTING DIRECTION DEVELOPING PEOPLE REDESIGNING THE ORGANISAION
  • 46.
    WHAT DOES THISMEAN? Can we “lead” our own departments? A new role/model for HOD’s at TGS? (Job design issues) Increased Leadership for HOD’s? (through practical, authentic, dec.mak. tasks)
  • 47.
    ATTACHMENTS Responsibilities ofBalanced Leadership 10 Proposition for Transforming Learning The Framework (with self reflection guide) AAPDC’s Educational Leadership Model
  • 48.
    ARTICLES “ Theonly way to go – shared leadership” “ Leadership tips for HOD’s” “ Strong leaders build great teams”
  • 49.
    FURTHER SOURCES OFINFORMATION Australian Principals Association Professional Development Council: http:// www.apapdc.edu.au / Australian Council for Educational Leaders: http:// www.acel.org.au /
  • 50.
    FURTHER SOURCES OFINFORMATION Teaching Australia: http://www.teachingaustralia.edu.au/ta/go Mind Tools: http:// www.mindtools.com/pages/main/newMN_LDR.htm Leadership Survival Guide: http://resources.sai-iowa.org/index.html
  • 51.
    FURTHER SOURCES OFINFORMATION Articles Previously supplied include: “ Building Collaboration” “ HR management and development: a framework for school subject departments” Others can be supplied from my own collection
  • 52.
    P.D. OPPORTUNITIES ISQ2007 State Conference , 25-27 July 2007 (Surfers Paradise) Directions for Catholic Educational Leadership in the 21st Century, 29 July – 1 August 2007 (Sydney) “ The Leadership Challenge,” The 2007 Research Conference of the ACER, 12-14 August 2007, (Melbourne) “ New Imagery for Schools and Schooling: challenge, creating and connecting” International Conference of ASCD and ACEL, 10-12 October 2007, (Sydney)