Skip to main content
Educational Planning and
Management
M.Ed
Rozina Rukanuddin Sewani
Introduction
• the terms ‘leadership’ and ‘management’ are used interchangeably.
This is perhaps because in many organisations, including schools and
colleges, both activities are often carried out by the same people.
• Leadership is concerned with the vision and values of an
organisation while management relates to the coordination of
organizational tasks and structures.
• it is important to point out that for overall school improvement both
management and leadership skills are required.
Understanding Leadership
• The purpose of a school is essentially what the school is trying to
achieve (the vision) and what the people believe to be important (the
values). Leadership may be seen as a process of initiating the dialogue
about these issues amongst the stakeholders, clarifying the points
made in the dialogue, reaching agreement or consensus about the
purpose of the school, and then communicating it to all concerned.
• When this process is undertaken, each school develops its own
unique purpose. This purpose generates commitment and ownership
amongst the stakeholders. For example, one school we are aware of
in Karachi has a statement of its purpose prominently displayed on a
wall near the entrance—this is a good method of communicating it to
all stakeholders. The statement proclaims that the school aims to
produce leaders in society (the vision) and that it believes in academic
excellence (the values).
A summary of important points about vision in
relation to leadership:
1. A vision is leader-initiated—it is the role of the leader to build
the vision for the future of the school.
2. The vision must be shared and supported—there must be
agreement amongst all school stakeholders that the vision is worth
pursuing.
3. The vision should be comprehensive and detailed—it should say
how, when, where, and what so that each person knows how they can
contribute.
4. The vision must be positive and inspiring—everyone in the
school must feel that it is worth the effort.
Types of Leadership
• There are a number of theories about the types of educational
leadership. However, it is important to note that the context of the
school and the particular situation you face would determine the type
of leadership you use. This is known as the contingency theory. As
head teachers or teacher, you might need to be transactional leaders
on one occasion, and, on other occasions, you might need to be
bureaucrats; however, research—and our experience—indicates that
if you focus on Pedagogical Leadership, your school improvement
efforts are more likely to be successful.
• Instructional leadership
Instructional leadership focuses on the role of the head teacher in
coordinating, controlling, supervising and developing curriculum and
instruction in the school (Hallinger, 2003).
• Bureaucratic leadership
Bureaucratic leadership focuses on the role of the head teacher in
mandating tasks and outcomes. Management systems that emphasise
supervision, evaluation and incentives support this type of leadership
(Sergiovanni, 1998).
• Visionary leadership
• Visionary leadership focuses on the role of the head teacher in
providing a vision for the school. The visionary leader does this by
motivating and inspiring schools to change (Sergiovanni, 1998).
• Entrepreneurial leadership
• Entrepreneurial leadership focuses on the role of the head teacher in
encouraging competition, providing incentives for winning and
disincentives for losing. (Sergiovanni, 1998)
• Transactional leadership
• Transactional leadership focuses on the role of the head teacher in
providing rewards (e.g. salary and other extrinsic rewards that the head
teacher controls to a certain degree) in exchange for services (e.g. from a
teacher).
• Transformational leadership
• Transformational leadership focuses on developing leadership capacity
within the organisation rather than limiting leadership to the head teacher.
It focuses on capacity development of school community members in order
to bring about improvement in teaching and learning. This is in contrast to
instructional leadership, where the head teacher focuses on directly
improving classroom teaching and learning. Transformational leadership
stresses on the head teacher’s moral role.
Distinction between transactional and
transformational
• The head teacher who practices transactional leadership expects
services (e.g. from a teacher) for various kind of rewards (e.g. salary
and other extrinsic rewards that the head teacher controls to a
certain degree). Leadership in this sense is a kind of transaction or
making a deal—something like ‘if you do this for me I will do that for
you’. Much school leadership is of this kind: for example, when the
head says to a teacher “if you look after the timetable, I will give you
two free periods per week”. You can see that here, a transaction is
taking place. The teacher might respond, “Yes, I will look after the
timetable but I need three free periods to do that”. If the two reach
and agreement, then a ‘deal’ has been made. This kind of leadership
is often necessary to keep the school running from day to day.
• On the other hand, the head teacher who practices transformational
leadership seeks to empower staff and share leadership so that the staff
members view school improvement as a reward in itself. The teacher in the
example above feels empowered when she looks after the timetable and
treats the better organisation of the school as a reward in itself.
Transformational leadership is linked with change and improvement and it
is seen when leaders:
• Stimulate interest among colleagues to view their work from new
perspectives
• Generate awareness of the mission and vision of the team and organisation
• Develop colleagues to higher levels of ability and potential
• Motivate colleagues and followers to look beyond their own interests
towards those that will benefit the group (Bass and Avolio, 1994, p. 2).
• Pedagogical
• The term ‘pedagogue’ derives from the Greek language where it referred
to a watchful guardian whose responsibility it was to lead (agogos) the
young boy (paides) to school. The adult had the task of accompanying the
child, of being with the child, and of caring for the child. This was a kind of
‘leading’ where one often walked behind the one who was led. The
pedagogue was there in loco parentis—in place of the parent (Van Manen,
1991).
• The term pedagogy was relatively uncommon in the language of educators
a decade ago. Now, publications and teachers’ discourses use the term
more frequently. We use the term as a synonym to teaching and learning.
• School leadership is complex and demanding. In an increasingly
decentralized context, schools are expected to make many of their
own decisions and manage their resources in ways that satisfy the
very high expectations of students, their parents, employers and the
wider community. Effective school leadership requires enormous
energy, sensitivity, a love of people and the capacity to tolerate
ambiguity. The ability to articulate personal values and strong
interpersonal skills are also necessary.
• based on a set of beliefs about what constitutes effective schooling
and appropriate student achievement. Leadership in schools focuses
on making these beliefs explicit in the school environment so that
there is a shared understanding that the focus of the school is student
learning. This incorporates curriculum planning, policy development
and the delivery of learning and teaching programmes that enable
students to develop their capacities as fully functioning and
responsible future citizens.
Beliefs and Values of Leaders
• Beliefs and values are the moral imperatives and ethical behaviours that set the expectations and responsibilities of an educational leader. We expect that an educational leader:
• • recognises promoting growth the intellect, well-being and character of students in the school as a primary responsibility.
• • accepts that all students have the capacity and right to learn.
• • has a key professional task as an educational leader, with final responsibility in the school for the quality of its total curriculum, its aims, its assessment and reporting,
its teaching and learning processes.
• • has a key responsibility in the development of a shared vision and mission for the school.
• • sees the school as a learning community, committed to the personal growth of all its members, both students and staff.
• • has a shared but ultimate responsibility for building staff team-work and collegiality for the mission of the school.
• • takes a responsible role in the professional growth and career development of staff in the school.
• • continues to develop professional knowledge, skills and attitudes and seeks to share these with colleagues.
• • accepts and respects the obligations of the school to the broader society, whose values influence school culture and on whom the school depends for moral and
material support.
• • will work jointly with staff to develop a constructive relationship with parents, as the students’ first teachers, and with the broader community.
• • develops and maintains consistency between stated values and practices and processes within the school.
• • is committed to integrity, honesty and respect for individuals.
• • exhibits loyalty to the employer, consistent with the moral and educational commitment to service to clients.
• • is committed to the support of the profession through networks concerned with the improvement of education.
• Some recent research findings (Waters, Marzano & McNulty, 2003)
show a strong relationship between leadership and student
achievement. This means that as a school leader’s ability increases so
too does student-learning achievement. This is a very important
finding! However, there is another equally important finding. Just as
school leaders can have a positive impact on achievement, they can
also have a marginal, or worse, a negative impact on achievement.
When leaders concentrate on the wrong school or classroom
practices, they can reduce student-learning achievement. It is
therefore very important to focus on practices that will improve
student learning in your school.
• Let us now look at the broad school and classroom practices that are
associated with increased student achievement. Table 1 lists these
practices. For school leaders and leadership teams wanting to know
where they should focus their improvement efforts, these areas
suggest places to start. Whilst you may not be able to do much about
external factors such as the home environment or background
knowledge, you could influence the other factors to bring about an
improvement in student achievement.
Table 1: School & teacher practices & student factors influencing student
achievement
School 1. Guaranteed and viable curriculum
2. Challenging goals and effective feedback
3. Parent and community involvement
4. Safe and orderly environment
5. Collegiality and professionalism
Teacher 6. Instructional strategies
7. Classroom management
8. Classroom curriculum design
Student 1. Home environment
Ha
• Below Table 2, you will find an activity (Activity 2 5) that will assist
you to think this through in terms of the following:
• • Where are you now? Which of the responsibilities listed in Table
2 are you currently doing?
• • Where do you want to be? Which of the responsibilities would
you like to include in your current work?
• • How do you get there? What changes do you need to make to
include those responsibilities in your work?
Table 2: The extent to which principal leadership
responsibilities impact on student achievement
Responsibilities The extent to which the principal…
Culture
fosters shared beliefs & a sense of community &
cooperation
Order establishes a set of standard operating procedures &
routines
Discipline
protects teachers from issues and influences that would detract from their
teaching time or focus
Resources provides teachers with materials & professional development necessary for the
successful execution of their jobs
Focus establishes clear goals & keeps those goals in the
forefront of the school’s attention