SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Lancer Gallery
I.

Summary of Facts
A. Market – Native Artifacts/Jewelry/Pottery and Replicas
1. Knowledgeable buyers/collectors
a. Native craftspeople
b. Replica buyers
c. Clients
2. Consumers
a. Gift buyers
b. Individuals looking for decorative items
c. Sole suppliers
3. Economic market
a. Monopolistic Competition
b. Oligopoly (few products)
B. Product
1. South American and African artifacts
a. Jewelry
b. Pottery
c. Replicas of authentic artifacts
2. Benefits
a. Pleasure/Personal use
b. Adding to collections
c. Historical aspects
d. Want authentic artifacts
e. Currency/monetary value
f. Use for a gift
g. Decorations
3. PLC
a. Growth Stage
b. Maturity Stage
C. Price
1. Replicas generate small portions of total sales
2. Artifact prices fluctuate depending on item
3. Gross Margins are $35 million
4. Constant rate of 20% per over last decade
5. Elasticity
a. Relatively inelastic
b. Relatively elastic
D. Promotion
1. Firm-sponsored shows
4. Expansibility
a. Relatively nonexpanisve
b. U.S. based with few locations and competitors
E. Place
1. Locations:
a) Phoenix,
b) Los Angeles,

2
c) Miami
d) Boston
2. Distribution centers:
a) specialty dealers
b) firm-sponsored showings
c) exclusive department stores
3. Channel: Lancer Gallery - Agent - Dealer - Consumer/User
F. Other
1. Lancer Gallery's Competition
a. Increased competition with eleven competitors
b. Added three more buyers to compete
c. Customers sending out their own buyers to work with native sources
d. Pricing fluctuating due to selling fake items by competitors
e. Internet competition
2. Lancer's National Standing Reputation
a. Careful verification of authenticity on products
b. Good quality
c. Respected source of artifacts
d. Long-term contracts with Native craftspeople
3. Political and Government Problems
a. Limitation on supply
b. Governments want less exporting
c. Government want national significant artifacts in their own countries
d. Artifacts are not easy to get
II. Problem/Opportunity
A. Primary – Contract with department store
B. Secondary
1. Limited supply of artifacts
2. Increased competition
3. Declining revenue due to economy
III. Recommended Action
A. Primary – Agree to contract with merchandise department store
B. Secondary
1. Create higher volume of replicas
2. Expand to other countries outside South America and Africa
3. Merge or acquire another competitor

More Related Content

What's hot

Jones Blair case brief
Jones Blair case briefJones Blair case brief
Jones Blair case brief
rodeo123
 
Cole Howie - Chipotle Case
Cole Howie - Chipotle CaseCole Howie - Chipotle Case
Cole Howie - Chipotle Case
Cole Howie
 
CCD VS BARISTA (MARKETING - STRATEGY)
CCD VS BARISTA (MARKETING - STRATEGY)CCD VS BARISTA (MARKETING - STRATEGY)
CCD VS BARISTA (MARKETING - STRATEGY)
Vinodprakash Shukla
 

What's hot (20)

Warby Parker Competitive Strategy
Warby Parker Competitive StrategyWarby Parker Competitive Strategy
Warby Parker Competitive Strategy
 
Biopure corporation
Biopure corporationBiopure corporation
Biopure corporation
 
cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c
 cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c
cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c
 
Jones Blair case brief
Jones Blair case briefJones Blair case brief
Jones Blair case brief
 
Ducati hbr case analysis
Ducati hbr  case analysisDucati hbr  case analysis
Ducati hbr case analysis
 
Starbucks Delivering Customer Value
Starbucks Delivering Customer ValueStarbucks Delivering Customer Value
Starbucks Delivering Customer Value
 
Cola Wars
Cola WarsCola Wars
Cola Wars
 
Xiameter Strategic Marketing
Xiameter Strategic MarketingXiameter Strategic Marketing
Xiameter Strategic Marketing
 
Dominion Motor Ltd
Dominion Motor LtdDominion Motor Ltd
Dominion Motor Ltd
 
Wildfang Case Study
Wildfang Case StudyWildfang Case Study
Wildfang Case Study
 
Process control polaroid
Process control polaroidProcess control polaroid
Process control polaroid
 
RFID at the Metro
RFID at the MetroRFID at the Metro
RFID at the Metro
 
Airborne Express
Airborne ExpressAirborne Express
Airborne Express
 
SONY AIBO-The value proposition and rationale behind the positioning
SONY AIBO-The value proposition and rationale behind the positioningSONY AIBO-The value proposition and rationale behind the positioning
SONY AIBO-The value proposition and rationale behind the positioning
 
Asha cola wars
Asha  cola warsAsha  cola wars
Asha cola wars
 
Cole Howie - Chipotle Case
Cole Howie - Chipotle CaseCole Howie - Chipotle Case
Cole Howie - Chipotle Case
 
CCD VS BARISTA (MARKETING - STRATEGY)
CCD VS BARISTA (MARKETING - STRATEGY)CCD VS BARISTA (MARKETING - STRATEGY)
CCD VS BARISTA (MARKETING - STRATEGY)
 
Precise software solutions case
Precise software solutions casePrecise software solutions case
Precise software solutions case
 
Ford Fiesta Social Media Campaign
Ford Fiesta Social Media CampaignFord Fiesta Social Media Campaign
Ford Fiesta Social Media Campaign
 
Sport obermeyer
Sport obermeyerSport obermeyer
Sport obermeyer
 

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (14)

X 5 case copy
X 5 case copyX 5 case copy
X 5 case copy
 
Student P
Student PStudent P
Student P
 
Haverwood furniture
Haverwood furnitureHaverwood furniture
Haverwood furniture
 
X4 case study copy
X4 case study copyX4 case study copy
X4 case study copy
 
Pmh
Pmh Pmh
Pmh
 
depth interview tabs
depth interview tabsdepth interview tabs
depth interview tabs
 
Clip pers project
Clip pers projectClip pers project
Clip pers project
 
Communispace case study copy
Communispace case study copyCommunispace case study copy
Communispace case study copy
 
Hillcrest case study copy
Hillcrest case study copyHillcrest case study copy
Hillcrest case study copy
 
Dermavescent copy
Dermavescent copyDermavescent copy
Dermavescent copy
 
Carnival cruise report copy
Carnival cruise report copyCarnival cruise report copy
Carnival cruise report copy
 
marketing plan (4)
marketing plan (4)marketing plan (4)
marketing plan (4)
 
Mary kay case
Mary kay caseMary kay case
Mary kay case
 
Dermavescent Laboratories
Dermavescent LaboratoriesDermavescent Laboratories
Dermavescent Laboratories
 

More from kimberlybak88

More from kimberlybak88 (15)

Jimmi’s marketing efforts
Jimmi’s marketing effortsJimmi’s marketing efforts
Jimmi’s marketing efforts
 
city presentation
city presentationcity presentation
city presentation
 
Final
FinalFinal
Final
 
Clippers Presentation
Clippers PresentationClippers Presentation
Clippers Presentation
 
Dermavescent Laboratories
Dermavescent LaboratoriesDermavescent Laboratories
Dermavescent Laboratories
 
Final carnival
Final carnivalFinal carnival
Final carnival
 
I pad powerpoint
I pad powerpointI pad powerpoint
I pad powerpoint
 
Cross tabulation for survey
Cross tabulation for surveyCross tabulation for survey
Cross tabulation for survey
 
Jimmi's bar
Jimmi's bar Jimmi's bar
Jimmi's bar
 
Cross Tabs
Cross TabsCross Tabs
Cross Tabs
 
Weymouth steel
Weymouth steelWeymouth steel
Weymouth steel
 
presentation (6)
presentation (6)presentation (6)
presentation (6)
 
diary project
diary projectdiary project
diary project
 
Final verision
Final verisionFinal verision
Final verision
 
Report
ReportReport
Report
 

Lancer gallery case study copy

  • 1. Lancer Gallery I. Summary of Facts A. Market – Native Artifacts/Jewelry/Pottery and Replicas 1. Knowledgeable buyers/collectors a. Native craftspeople b. Replica buyers c. Clients 2. Consumers a. Gift buyers b. Individuals looking for decorative items c. Sole suppliers 3. Economic market a. Monopolistic Competition b. Oligopoly (few products) B. Product 1. South American and African artifacts a. Jewelry b. Pottery c. Replicas of authentic artifacts 2. Benefits a. Pleasure/Personal use b. Adding to collections c. Historical aspects d. Want authentic artifacts e. Currency/monetary value f. Use for a gift g. Decorations 3. PLC a. Growth Stage b. Maturity Stage C. Price 1. Replicas generate small portions of total sales 2. Artifact prices fluctuate depending on item 3. Gross Margins are $35 million 4. Constant rate of 20% per over last decade 5. Elasticity a. Relatively inelastic b. Relatively elastic D. Promotion 1. Firm-sponsored shows 4. Expansibility a. Relatively nonexpanisve b. U.S. based with few locations and competitors E. Place 1. Locations: a) Phoenix, b) Los Angeles, 2
  • 2. c) Miami d) Boston 2. Distribution centers: a) specialty dealers b) firm-sponsored showings c) exclusive department stores 3. Channel: Lancer Gallery - Agent - Dealer - Consumer/User F. Other 1. Lancer Gallery's Competition a. Increased competition with eleven competitors b. Added three more buyers to compete c. Customers sending out their own buyers to work with native sources d. Pricing fluctuating due to selling fake items by competitors e. Internet competition 2. Lancer's National Standing Reputation a. Careful verification of authenticity on products b. Good quality c. Respected source of artifacts d. Long-term contracts with Native craftspeople 3. Political and Government Problems a. Limitation on supply b. Governments want less exporting c. Government want national significant artifacts in their own countries d. Artifacts are not easy to get II. Problem/Opportunity A. Primary – Contract with department store B. Secondary 1. Limited supply of artifacts 2. Increased competition 3. Declining revenue due to economy III. Recommended Action A. Primary – Agree to contract with merchandise department store B. Secondary 1. Create higher volume of replicas 2. Expand to other countries outside South America and Africa 3. Merge or acquire another competitor