Kritios Boy Essay

Kritios Boy Essay
The Greek period, ca. 900–30 BCE, was famous for its developed ideals of human beauty, the
concept of ideal heroic male nudes and what they depict, and progression from symbolic works to
naturalism. Using the discussion of the following artworks, the (Anavysos)Kouros, the Kritios Boy
and the Spear Bearer (Doryphoros), I will discuss their symbolic and naturalistic characteristics. The
statue of Kouros by an unknown artist, depicts a Greek young man. He is nude representing the
ideal heroic male nude. This work is symbolic because he is the representation of God, warrior, a
symbolic ancestor or a victorious athlete. His large eyes were made by getting inspiration from
Mesopotamia. From the frontal view, his hands are at sides, fists clenched, and striding feet. The
stiff and muscular figure symbolizes that he was ready to go into war for his town, family or
country. The eyes are unnaturally wide open, and the mouth forms a characteristic closed
expression, also known as archaic smile. Archaic smile makes a piece more expressive. The stiff
figure and frontality shows the symbolism of the piece. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The body of the statue is supported by the left leg while the right leg is bent, in a relaxing state, his
head is slightly turned to the right and tilted. It also represents ideal heroic male nude. The Kritios
Boy is much smaller compared to the Kouros. It is more relaxed and lifelike figure where the
Kouros is a stiff figure. He has soft rounded body form, broad facial features, and calm expression.
This work doesn't include archaic smile, but the significant characteristic of the work is
contrapposto, which means that the weight of the statue is concentrated and balanced on one side,
there is a "S" shaped curve in his back or spin causing slight shift in hips and subtle drop of one
shoulder. It represents more comfortable and realistic pose. So, the use of contrapposto makes the
work
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Menkaura And Kouros: A Comparative Analysis
Both the Statue of Menkaura and Queen Khamerernebty II and the Marble Statue of a Kouros depict
an idealized type of art that focuses on the 'wanted' physique of men during these time periods. Both
Menkaura and Kouros portray a man 'standing at attention' as if they were giving commands to
those below them. From a military stand point, this stance shows others dedication, and allows the
surrounding men to be commanded by their leader easier. Both men are standing forward, almost as
if they are looking into the lives of those within their community. Both statues lack facial
expressions, allowing the viewer to question why the artist portrayed them this way. As a viewer, the
facial lack of facial expressions between the statues allow us to gain

Naturalism In Greek Art
During the Greek period, ca. 900–30 BCE, Greek artists slowly progressed from symbolism to
naturalism by using the ideals of human beauty and the concept of ideal heroic male nudes. Through
the discussion of these works, the Kouros (Anavysos), Kritios Boy, and the Spear Bearer
(Doryphoros) made by Polykleitos, I will explain how Greek artists developed these ideals and
moved from symbolism to naturalism. The Kouros is a sculpture of a young man as well as the
Greek name for a young man. This work portrays a nude young man with large eyes and an archaic
smile that revives the expression on his face. His fixed position reveals that he is fit with his
balanced muscles and ready to go to battle and defend his country. In other words, he is an ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In addition, the Kritios boy is smaller than the Kouros in size and has round body forms and broad
facial features. Even the position of the Kritios Boy is more relaxed than the position of the Kouros
because it is more relaxed and contrapposto due to its asymmetrical stance where the weight is
shifted to one side with the bent of the knee, drop of the shoulder and the S–shaped back. However,
the Kritios Boy evolved from the Kouros because it also follows the concept of the ideal heroic male
since it is a sculpture of a young man with defined muscles who is ready to go to war and fight for
his people like the Kouros. Besides, the Kritios Boy, like the Kouros, consider nudity as part of
human beauty that should be appreciated like art because we are pieces of art created by our God.
Yet, unlike the Kouros, the Kritios Boy departs from symbolism and focuses on naturalism as seen
in his smile and posture. Both of these features make the sculpture look more realistic and natural
because most people stand in contrapposto without knowing it and they have a normal smile that
does not look fake like an archaic

Similarities Between Egypt And Greek Art
Over the years of art history, there are many great empires that we think of and two of those were
ancient Greek and Egyptian. When talking about Greek and Egyptian art history, it is the sculptures
that come to mind when you are comparing and contrasting artworks. Egyptian art and Greek art
both had mesmerizing sculptures but Egyptian art was more oriented towards religion and Greek art
was more focused on philosophy. The Egyptian statue of the Menkaure and a Queen was similar to
the Greek statue of Metropolitan Kouros in their posture but both of these statues also had many
differences. Menkaure and a queen statue was created from an unusual stone and the statue was
discovered in Menkaure's valley temple. The sculpture has a hard texture and because of the time–
consuming task of polishing this sculpture was never completely polished. So, the sculpture is
greywacke and has traces of red paint on king's face, ears and neck because male figures were
traditionally painted red and there are traces of black in queen's hair. The sculpture itself is 54 ½
inches in height and is displayed in the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Metropolitan Kouros was
created from marble which seems like it has a rough and hard texture. The statue is 6 feet in height
and is displayed at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.
During early dynasty Egypt period, Egypt's kings were reverted as gods in human form. So,
Egyptian sculptor created statues of their kings and queens. After creating the statue

How Did Egyptian Art Influence Greek Art
Egyptian art had significantly influenced the Greeks art. This is profoundly showed in the Greek
Kouros figure of a standing youth and its Egyptian prototype of Menkaure. Though the Greeks were
greatly influenced by the Egyptians, their are still notable differences between the two. Such as that
the Egyptians and Greeks followed complete opposite rules when creating. This helped them each
have their own distinct style. Although the Greeks were inspired by the Egyptian figure of
Menkaure, both figures served as completely different purposes. The sculpture of Menkaure was
used in a funerary context to house the soul of the king after his death. It is possible that the Greek
sculpture had the same purpose, however the subject of the figures

Compare And Contrast Two Works Of Art
ARTW 101 – Society and Visual Art
University of Redlands
Compare and Contrast Two Works Of Art
Greek culture is the source from which many of the characteristic elements of Western culture
derive. Their explorations and innovations in art have both fascinated and inspired other
civilizations for centuries. For this assignment I chose two Greek sculptures viewed at the Getty
Museum. The first is Kouros circa 530 B.C. made of Dolomitic marble from Thasos and is
approximately 200 cm (80 in) in height. The second is Cult Statue of a Goddess, (most likely
Aphrodite) South Italy, 425 – 400 B.C. made of Limestone and marble. It stands at a height of 220
cm (86 5/8 in). There is some dispute to the authenticity of the Getty Kouros ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The overall all renditions are block–like and sculpted with geometric reduction of details. The
anatomy is made up of planes, completely symmetrical. The hair, ears, and eyes have been reduced
to simple shapes – again, all identically symmetrical. Kouros is depicted nude, symbolic of Archaic
Greece's emphasis on the ideal individual male and autonomous Greek citizen. In contrast,
Aphrodite is a considerably large female (7 feet tall and substantially wider than the Kouros). Given
the larger than real–life scale, this statue probably served as a cult image in a temple. The statue's
excellent state of conservation also suggests that it was kept indoors. It is free standing but also in an
anatomical, not just mechanical sense. The pose is full and rounded, not solely frontal. You get a
sense of the body being relaxed, with one hand extended in a gesture that gives a sense of it moving
forward.
One foot is also forward with Aphrodite but with the pelvis at an angle to the ground plane creating
the position known as contrapposto, the position of a human figure in painting or sculpture in which
the hips and legs are turned in a different direction from that of the shoulders and head; the twisting
of a figure on its own vertical axis. Additionally, no geometric reduction and arrangement of
separate parts occurs with Aphrodite. You have a complete human face with each

Kouros From Tenea Analysis
Becca Rios
RFR459
ARH 304
Curious about the Kouros The Kouros from Tenea is a figure based on anatomical perfection as
perceived by the Greeks. The figure is standing in a contrapposto free–standing sculpture that looks
as if he's a walking being. It's slender build and pronounced muscles exemplify it as a nude statue
around 5'3 feet tall in comparison to my own height. The figure displays a protruding chest and
collarbone bringing about it's very symetrical and geometric qualities. It's an idealistic view of a
young man in the mid–sixth century B.C. The figure is standing on a square plaster base limiting its
movement any further but creating a balance. The sculptor held this figure suspended in time as it is
grounded on to the base. This creates a sense of eternal youth as it's facial features and anatomical
details do not have any marked characteristics of old age. As an extremely stylized sculpture, due to
it's hairstyle and protruding eyes, the figure personifies elegance. In mid–step ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
I expected him to walk straight towards me and spark a conversation. His wide eyes and smiling
features made him appear as if he were ready to go on an outing. I felt chills, ready for this
inanimate figure to come to life. Due to the elaborately styled hair I was inclined to touch it,
reminding me much of the Assyrian hair style. I stood there marveling at the figures stance of an
early rendition of contrapposto. His weight placed on one foot more than the other created the
illusion of him taking a step. I anthropomorphized the figure as I imagined him walking like any
other human being. His symetrical stance and his hands clenched gave him a sense of power and
god–like

Similarities And Differences Between Ancient And...
There are subtle stylistic differences that occur in the Piombino Apollo that make it more advanced
than the archaic kouros, which lead many scholars to distinguish this statue as Hellenistic rather than
Archaic. The modelling of the back is one of the biggest alterations that occurs between actual
kouros from the archaic period and the Piombino Apollo. The back of the statue is much more
artistically advanced than the front regarding modelling (Ridgway 1967: 48). The subtle modelling
of the muscular structures and ridges of the spine of the back suggest the desired realism of the
Hellenistic era, instead of the basic and ridged 'idealized' form found in the archaic period (Ridgway
1967: 48). More subtle differences between a true archaic sculpture and a retrograded Hellenistic
sculpture are also present in this statue in other areas, such as the feet. On most kouros, the feet are
high arched, but on the Piombino Apollo, they are small and flat (Ridgway 1967: 49). Also the toes
are a discrepancy between the two eras. Usually "archaic statues have [the toes] aligned with the
central part of the other foot" (Ridgway 1967: 49) in a very geometric fashion. However, the toes on
the right foot of the Apollo do not align with the middle of the left foot, and instead align with the
left heel (Ridgway 1967: 49). As stated earlier, the hair is a defining feature in archaic kouros and it
is typically flat and in a bulky beaded shape to best attempt to represent the different

Essay on Hatshepshut v/s Kouros
Ancient Egyptian and Greek statues have many similarities. Hatshepsut in a Devotional Attitude is
an Egyptian statue from 1473–1458 BCE. It is almost 8 feet tall and almost 2.5 feet wide. It is made
of granite and is a statue of Queen Hatshepsut, the wife of Tutmose III, one of the most dynamic
egyptian kings of the eighteenth dynasty. The Marble Statue of a Kouros (youth) is an Archaic
Greek statue from 590–680 BCE. It is a little over 6 feet tall and about 20 inches at its widest. It is
the representation of a nude male figure and is made of marble. However, the artists of both the
statues are unknown. Although both of these statues are human representations , neither precisely
depicts what the actual human figure looks ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By 680–590 BCE, artists probably became more sensitive to body alignment along with posture.
Kouros has his hands clenched by his sides, which is still an awkward pose but more realistic than
the statue of Hatshepsut. Although the Kouros has a more realistic body, the statue of Hatshepsut has
a more realistic face. The Kouros' head, as well as his eyes, nose, and mouth are too big for his
body, whereas Hatshepsut's face is more realistic because her features are rightly placed even though
her nose is missing. Because she is idealized and conforming to strict conventions of Egyptian art,
she has features that are almost too good to be true. The surface textures of the statues affect their
realism. Hatshepsut in a Devotional Attitude is made of granite, which makes the statue look
immovable, whereas the Kouros is more realistic because marble makes its surface texture more
smooth, almost skin like. Hatshepsut's stature probably made the artist represent her in an
inaccessible manner, as seen in the use of red and black colored granite stone, which represents her
unlike any common woman of her era whereas Kouros is made to seem more lifelike and closer to
what a common greek man would look like. He is more approachable. They are both stylistic
depictions of the human form that conform to the conventions of their respective cultures.
Hatshepsut is a pharaoh whereas the Kouros is simply a young man; this is

Italian Renaissance Art
One of the most influential periods in the history of Western Art is the Italian Renaissance, between
1400–1600 CE. During this time art flourished, and many of the techniques and advancements of art
would continue to be taught in art schools that spread across Europe and lay as the foundation of art
in modern society. However, some of the main values taught from the Renaissance also caused the
resurgence of art at the time, and were originally adapted from the Ancient Greek (Visual–arts...).
Particularly in sculpture, the Greeks focus on perfecting the naturalism of the human form would
influence sculptors and artist of the Renaissance and Western civilization to maintain focus of
depicting human anatomy accurately and resembling real human ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Even within the Hellenistic period, between 323 to 30 BCE and the ending period of Greeks in
power, advancements were made to not only movement of the human figure in sculptor but what
expression they held (Gardner 153). During this period Greece had become providence to Rome,
and under patronage of Roman leaders came the marble statue of Lacoön and his sons, depicting
story of the Gods revenge on the Trojan priest after his failed attempt to warn the Trojan army of the
Greek's plans with the wooden horse. Attributed to three sculptors, Athanadoros, Hagesandros, and
Polydoros of Rhodes, this marble statue stands 7' 10 ½ "tall, the tallest being Lacoön himself in the
center and his two sons on opposite sides. The three men are twisting and contorting their bodies,
attempting to free themselves from the massive snake sent by the gods, all three of their expressions
show they are in pain from the strung. Lacoön's face is contorted with the most agony from the
snake biting him in his left hip (162). The expression of pain within all three figures shows the
evolution of how Greek sculptors depicted humans in art, along with the advancement to how
movement is portrayed. This statue would also play a role in inspiring how sculptors of the
Renaissance would work with marble, and was even unearthed in Rome during this time, in 1506, in
front of

Naturalistic Sculpture In Ancient Greece
Looking back on sculpture in Ancient Greece, the first examples of a naturalistic form are seen.
Stone and heart were melded to display humans and animals as they exist in nature. Earlier artists,
influenced by the Ancient Egyptians, saw sculpture as a way to admire human perfection in figures
known as Kouros. In 492 BC, Persia invaded Athens and in their wake, most of the existing Kouros
were destroyed. During the time period spanning from Archaic Greece to Classical Greece, artists
developed the desire to create figures inspired by the world allowing the more detailed style of
naturalistic form to take motion. Due to the eradication of Archaic sculptures during the Persian
wars, Greek Sculpture was renewed from stiff Kouros into figures instilled ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Through looking at the human body, studying its contractions and bone structure, a realistic
representation could be created. Part of this included having the correct proportion of head to body.
Polykleitos, while perfecting his own idea of what male nude proportions should be, formed a
climax toward the naturalistic form in regards to order within chaos. Included in his work and
multiple others, the naturalistic form expanded on the practice of arrested motion. This uses
contrapposto and the tensing and relaxing of muscles in response to the movement of the body in
order to create the feeling that the figure was just frozen in time. Arrested Motion was a major shift
from Archaic Kouros that appeared to be stiff in their movement and timeless overall. To achieve a
Naturalistic form, the sculptor first had to extend his representation of reality. This included the use
of a more complex system of symmetry to give the appearance of uniformity yet achieve parallel
lines and a balance between compression and stretching. The Discobolus by Myron had a certain
view to see the perfection of his work while at the rest of the viewpoints only jumbles of lines were
produced. This displays that to extend reality some natural elements needed to be sacrificed. The
Naturalistic form allowed the figures to appear alive and have the illusion of perfection within

Patera Essay
The explicit journey through the history of Patera The Patera found in Greek South of Italy during
the Archaic period c. 500 BC. Was a shallow pan made from bronze with a Kourous figure as it
handle. This research essay will work to prove how the form of the Patera served a greater purpose
to it functions through its significance journey through the craftsmanship of bronze, superior status
of the Kouros and multipurpose usage it served. The bronze material which the Patera was crafted
from is a valuable resource to the Greek and Romans. It is primarily used in Greek and Roman art
because of its tensile strength, thus validating as to why the Greek and Romans were possessive
over the material. Furthermore, its unique handle of the nude Kourous ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It started out as a cup to pour libations and eat out of during dinners or at religious ceremonies.
(Wonderlich, Silvia A 165). However, it was different from other drinking vessels. It was used as a
piece of weaponry or armour prop by King Pterelas during his comedic plays (Polt, Christopher
233). The verb potirara means to drink which plays off the word Pater. (Polt, Christopher 233). The
connection between potirara and Patera had an influence on how the audience had looked at King
Pterelas, he was portrayed as a drunk (Polt, Christopher 233). Pterelas was not a king who merely
drank, but one who drank continuously (Polt, Christopher 233). King Pterelas was not the first to
use the Patera as a prop. On Corinthian coin of Augustus, Octavia is represented seated holding a
scepter and a Patera (Frazer, J.G 23). It only makes sense to have a goddess pose with something
just as valuable as she is. When the Patera was not being used as prop it was used as a form of
sacrifice (Walker, J). The blood of the victim would go into the Patera has poured into the sea by the
way of libation (Walker, J). Most religious people would abstain from eating or drinking from the
Patera because of the sacrifices that were being done (Smith, William and Anthon, Charles 738).
The Pateras function meant a lot to people either in a form of entrainment, status role or religious
purpose. It was not taken for

The Joker Analysis
Let's start with the joker. Now as see he is just sanding, but look at his fist they are clenched. I
thought this was a lot like Kouros. When looking through the book trying to find sculptures that
made me think of one of these five images. I know funny how the first one I find to match is to the
first image given to me as well as the oldest sculpture for me to refers. This is an Archaic 530 BEC
Marble statue, they have yet to hit the perfect human body. Now if you want to get into the
psychological side with the joker. He is nowhere near perfect, he is a very twisted and unperfected
person. The way his body is presented shows he isn't quite there, which is also true for the Kouros.
They both also have physical feature that aren't quite right. The joker has his scars on his face and
Kouros still lacks details of the normal human being. Princess leia, what a fun girl from Star Wars.
She really is quite loved. When looking at this image and then looking through the book all I can
think is Seer, Classic ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The image I compare this to is the Zeus 460–450 BCE Bronze. Now for me I see more similarities
then some others might. It's not just that they both have their arms up and open. But both look to me
as if they are showing an advantage they have to a sport. As an ex track athlete I know what
throwing a javelin looks like, and the Zeus sculpture looks just like that at the plant. Also If you look
at his hand in the back you can see he is doing what's called a Finnish grip. That's the type of finger
placement he looks to have, that grip is one of the more powerful grips. In the wings image you can
see how the players hand covers about a quarter of the ball, that promotes good ball control and
makes him more prime to play. In both it shows long arms, both Javelin and basketball long arms
are amazing. In javelin you can throw further and in basketball you can reach further. Both images
are conveying perfect

Comparing The Spear Bearer And The Metropolitan Kouros
Throughout the history of art, the human body and figure has captivated both artisans and their
audiences. This can be said especially of the Greeks and their sculptures. Even from the earliest
periods, Greeks motivation for the search of the ideal human body can be seen through the sculpture
Metropolitan Kouros (c 120–50 BCE), created in the Archaic period and said to be found in Attica,
Ancient Greece (Richter 1931, p. 220). However, it is not until High Classical period that they truly
achieve their goal with Polykleitos' The Spear Bearer (c. 120–50 BCE) or the Doryphoros (its Greek
name). The sculpture, found in a Palestra in Pompeii, Italy is said to be the epitome of perfection
during its period. Although there is exquisite rendering and beauty in both sculptures, there are also
a vast number of differences that make each work unique.
Subject matter
On the surface, there is much similarity between The Spear Bearer and the Metropolitan Kouros.
Both works of art portray a human being, or to be more precise, the ideal human figure, which is the
main topic of both sculptures. In the case of the Metropolitan Kouros, an aristocrat male is shown,
unlike The Spear Bearer in which a male athlete is depicted. In both sculptures, one can notice that
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If you drew a line down the center of its body, you would be able to notice that both sides are
identical. Meanwhile, in The Spear Bearer these things have changed, here one can see a slight "S"
curve through the motions of the upper body, hips, and legs, rather than a straight symmetrical line
down the middle (Khan Academy). This is when, for the first time in Western Art we have figures
that seem fully alive. Lastly, regarding the statues' naturalistic qualities, even when both are stylized,
The Spear Bearer is clearly much more naturalistic. In contrast, the Metropolitan Kouros has body
parts and features that have been reduced to geometrical

Art History Paper: Transformation Between Sculpture and...
Casey Chiovaro
December 3, 2012
Optional Paper
Art History 109
Define the transformations that have taken place between the sculpture of the late archaic period and
that of the early Classical period. Note how these imply a change in relationship of the viewer to the
work of art.
Throughout history, sculptures have developed significantly. The Western tradition of sculptures
began in Ancient Greece along with Egypt and many other ancient civilizations around the world.
Greece is widely seen as producing great masterpieces in the archaic period and as time evolved into
the classical period more detailed and sensible artwork developed. During the archaic period (c.660–
480 B.C.) sculpture emerged as a principal form of artistic ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Typical Archaic sculptures are produced to be very frontal and have the archaic smile on its face.
Anavysos Kouros has both of these descriptions. The art work's body language would portray the
sculpture to convey no emotion but with the archaic smile represented on it's face the viewer may
become confused due to the inconsistent body language. The body looks as if it is very light but still
has extremely large muscles that are tensed which also back up the argument that it's unnatural. The
statue should be in motion due to the one leg in front of the other but the statue is portrayed as
frozen which makes it extremely mechanical.
On the other hand, the Kritios Boy Statue from century 480 B.C. is much more organic with a more
fluid body stance. Never before had a sculptor been concerned with depicting how a human being,
as opposed to a stone image, actually stands. Real people do not stand in the stiff form of the kouroi
and korai. Humans shift their weight and the region of the main body parts around the vertical but
flexible axis of the spine. The muscular and skeletal structures are depicted with freely lifelike
accuracy, with the rib cage naturally expanded as if in the act of breathing, with a collected and calm
demeanor and hips, which are distinctly narrower. The artist of this image was the first to grasp this
fact and represent it in statuary. The head also turns slightly to the right and tilts,

Comparing Apollo And Kouros
Both states do have some similarity with each other. As both were trying to have a realistic and life
like design to the model of the statues. With a little different touch of the dynamic, gesture and
anatomy in their own way. But they use different type of stones, material for better ways in
sculpting. The Romans may have taken some ideas from the Greek, like pottery, temple and theater
designs, but at least it's not all the same. Surely they put some influence from their point of view to
put some touch in their style. Comparing the two statutes of Apollo (fig 6.16) and the Kore and
Kouros (fig.5.14.15), both are going for the more life size, and closely realistic gesture. Apollo is
made with terra cotta, he has a toga on him that was crave

Periods of Greek Art
Greek art has changed throughout the years, yet some basic forms have remained. Time, technique,
as well as historical events have helped shape the way art has evolved since 600 B.C. Three
important periods in Greek art are the Archaic, Classical, and Hellenistic periods. We will discuss
how art has changed throughout these periods, what influences led to change, as well as why it
changed. We will also discuss what has remained constant through these periods. Since people's
perceptions and taste of art are different, some would say that art has become better with time,
whereas others would say the opposite, but nonetheless, it has evolved. The Archaic period dates
from 800 B.C. to 480 B.C. The Greeks were inspired by monumental stone sculpture of Egypt and
Mesopotamia, sculpting in stone began in Greece. However, although this was inspired by Egypt,
there were significant differences between how they were sculpted. For instance, take the Greek
sculpture Kouros (c 580 B.C. made of marble, standing at 6'4" tall) the standing male nude. While
this resembled characteristics of Egypt sculptures such as pose and proportion, his form becomes
more dynamic as the sculpture is nude. Kouros also appears to wear jewelry around his neck and the
exquisite detail in the braids of his hair suggest he is groomed and dressed properly. Another
difference in Egypt and Greek sculptures, is that Egypt's sculptures depict rulers and people of
higher stature, where Greek sculptures would depict

Compare And Contrast Menkaure And Queen
It is important to first begin with the basics of each piece of artwork. The graywacke statue of
Menkaure and a Queen was made between c. 2490–2472 BCE during the Old Kingdom period in
Giza, Egypt. Although the artist is unknown, it is understood that the time during which this artwork
was made was during the Old Kingdom period, which lasted from c. 2575–2150 BCE. This statue is
smaller in height than the average human being, being 51 ½ inches tall, which is a little over four
and a quarter feet tall (Stokstad and Cothren: 60). The stone that it is made from is a rocky, rough
stone, that took a considerable amount of sanding to get the statue to look as smooth as it is. The
second set of statues I will be comparing and contrasting to the Menkaure and Queen are the
limestone statues, Anavysos Kouros and the Peplos Kore. Both were made in c. 530 BCE during the
Archaic period in Athens, Greece. Similar to Menkaure and a Queen, the Anavysos Kouros and the
Peplos Kore do not have a known artist, however it is known that the time period in which the
statues were made was during the Archaic Period, which lasted from c. 600–480 BCE. These statues
are more life–like in size. The Kouros statue is around the size of a tall male, six feet four inches
tall. On the other hand, the Kore statue is smaller in stature, about four foot tall . Both statues were
made from carved marble, although some of the other kouros and kore statues that were made were
from terra cotta, wood, or limestone

Humanism In Ancient Greek Art
The ancient Greek civilization has long fascinated the world. Their achievement in art, literature,
science, medicine, philosophy was not paralleled by any other civilization at its time. The Greek art
gave rise to the Renaissance and classical art we treasure today. Humanism: Men are the measure of
all things (Protagoras, 490–420 BCE) guided every aspect of the Greek society, and the concept is
clearly reflected in their artworks. The Getty Villa houses many exquisite examples of humanism in
art. The Greeks see the human body as an example of supreme physical beauty; therefore, each
generation of Greek artists endeavored to produce a more natural representation of the human body.
With no standing army, every Greek citizen had the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The ancient Greeks invented gods and goddesses for almost every aspect and purpose in life, and
gradually developed intricate yet captivating stories for them. The ancient Greece was a harsh
world. City States are constantly at war; life expectancy was short, and infant mortality was as high
as 50%; the weather was unpredictable, thus at times, food became scarce (3,4). Although the
ancient Greeks were highly rational and believed in science, the existence of deities helped explain
what was not understood by the ancient people. Worshiping and pleasing their gods were a vital part
of the Greek society (5). The Greeks produced a large amount of artworks to pay tribute to the gods
and goddesses in exchange for their favor. Humanism is evident in how Greek artists depicted their
deities. Civilizations predating the Greeks carefully distinguished their deities from humans in
artworks. For example, Mesopotamian deities have bull horns or have animal bodies with a human
head; Egyptian gods are depicted as having animal heads on human bodies, or they have features to
distinguish them from humans, such as Osiris and Isis. However, Greek gods and goddesses are
represented in normal human forms. They are physically more attractive and more powerful than
human beings, yet they possess human attributes, such as flaws, weakness, and emotions, etc. Greek
artists believe that gods and goddesses should be elevated and

Gender Roles In Art
Gender Roles Set in Stone Prehistoric and ancient artists represent men and women in various ways
and the works of art tell an altered story, which reinforces old–fashioned gender roles. Additionally,
representations of prehistoric and ancient genders illustrate the social standards of their specific
periods. The views of gender presented by the works of art are still recognizable, despite all
individual's current sensibilities and views today. An individual's contemporary view is of gender
and gender rules illustrates the significant social progress that the human culture has made.
Although the Woman of Willendorf and Kouros/Statue of standing Youth artworks were created at
different times, the genders can still easily be depicted within the artwork. The artwork, Woman of
Willendorf, consists of pointy legs, a lack of facial detail, and an exaggerated emphasis on the hips
and the breast, which implies a specific purpose. However, the purpose is one that individuals have
the power of guessing. This artwork was founded in northern Austria and is considered one of the
earliest known works of religious art. The female characteristics of this artwork are highly ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One example of ancient artists representing men can be seen in the Statue of Standing Youth, or the
Kouros. The male gender is being depicted through art because there is a rigid frontal area, rather
than the soft frontal area of the female gender statue that the prehistoric artists created. The structure
represents the male figure in motion, moving into the distance, rather than standing still.
Additionally, all individuals can see the chest muscles and the pelvic arch of the male figure
represented in the Statue of Standing Youth. Generally, the large body represents how the ancient
civilization looked at the male gender and seemed to portray their

Greek Archaic Statue: The Kroisos Kouros
What is the main purposes for humanity? Is it a universal motive, or could it be more than one? You
may think it depends who you are talking to, and this idea may have some true to it. There is a
divergent range of beliefs of what these goals or purposes in life are. Some people would base it on
religion, love, happiness, tradition, culture values or many other things that could even be unknown
to some individuals. For the most part most of these categories can be linked in some way, They can
be complete opposite but they are still followed with desire and passion. One of the main things that
human's can't hide even if they try is this desire to express or show what they feel. Sometimes it is
even without thinking that we express with body movements, sounds, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This Greek Archaic statue was beginning to formulate shape in better relation to the figure, The
details seemed to be made with more attention and observation. Then we have the Kritios Boy from
Acropolis who is extremely similar to the Kroisos Kouros but from a latter period. The Kritios Boy
from Acropolis was from the Early Classical and carved from marble as well. butting a side the
similarities, which are easily noticeable, we can also find great differences that show the
improvement. The Kroisos Kouros is an improvement from the previous sculptures to his era, the
proportions of this piece begin to make more sense and relate more to the true human anatomy. Then
we can see the Kritios Boy from Acropolis, This figure is even more advance than the previous. We
can see how the Kritios Boy has a more refined suggestion of movement and we see this in the
smooth shoulders and the lightly tilted hips. The great mimc of the flesh was executed in a great
manner by the greeks. The improvement and gained experiences are important to consider and
analyze, This need only kept becoming stronger every

Comparing Menkaure And Queen Sculpture
1. The Menkaure and a Queen sculpture is 142.3 cm tall. It was from Giza but is located in the
Museum of Fine Arts in Boston. The medium used is graywacke with traces of red and black paint.
The Metropolitan Kouros sculpture is 6 feet 1 .95 m tall. It was found in Attica Greece but located in
New York in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The medium used is marble.
2. The Menkaure and a queen sculpture is standing against a wall or post. Its sculpted on black
stone. The king is standing stiffly and expressionless with his wife holding him while walks
forward. The king and queen step with their left foot forward. His hands are clenched and is wearing
only a skirt. He also wears a hat. The sculpture seems smooth. The Metropolitan Kouros sculpture is
free standing and is made of a beige colored stone. He is naked with his left foot forward as well.
Kouros muscles and body parts are detailed in the sculpture. His hands are clenched and he is
emotionless. His hair looks like dread locks.
3. The fisrt difference you see in the sculpture is that Menkuare and a Queen is in black. Menkuare
looks like an Egyptian sculpture and you can tell by the way they are dressed. It is about four feet
and six inches tall. The king hides his hair with a hat. He is wearing clothing and has his queen
beside him. Metropolitan Kouros is in beige and looks like ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
I see power and strength coming from the Menkaure and a Queen sculpture. It looks like he is ready
to take charge. The pose that he gives shoes leader ship and assertiveness. The way he put his left
foot in front shows power. The way he has his arms and hands places shows that he doesn't back
down and is in charge. It follows follows what a traditional king is considered as which is athletic
and youthful. The Kouros gives the sense of athletic, youth and nudity was allowed and accepted but
only for men. The Kouros was seen as gods and warriors. The young males were thought to be
fertile so this work could have symbolized

Blink By Malcolm Gladwell Summary
Malcolm Gladwell, the author of the best selling book Tipping Point, wrote Blink. Before being a
staff writer for The New Yorker, he was a business and science reporter for the Washington Post.
The connection between the cutting–edge neuroscience and psychology research will change the
way you understand every decision you make. The book is about how we sum up all the data that is
before us and in a split second make an informed decision–in the blink of an eye. It explains how we
think without thinking and how we make choices that we can't explain. At the beginning of the book
Gladwell sets out three purposes of this book. Blink is a book that explains how we make decisions
in everyday life, first impressions when meeting someone new or have to make decisions under
stress. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The second purpose is to acknowledge the reverse proposition, to learn from our mistakes. The third
purpose is how snap judgments and first impressions can be taught and controlled. The book starts
with the example of the J. Paul Getty Museum's purchase that ended up being a forgery. The
museum was approached by an art dealer back in 1983 and said that he had a statue dating back to
sixth century BC known as a kouros. A kouros is a sculpture of a nude male youth standing with his
left leg forward and his arms at his sides (Gladwell 2005: 1). The officials from the museum
purchased the statue after they did a 14–month investigation but had suspiciousness. The museum
brought in Greek scholars and just looked at the kouro from a glance. Thomas Hoving looked at the
kouro and felt that it was to fresh, Angelos Dontas felt intuitive repulsion, and for Georgios Dontas
had a feeling there was a glass between him and the statue (Gladwell 2005: 11). They didn't know
why they had these feelings but they knew it was a

Kouros Vs Menkaure Analysis
Both Kouros and Menkaure are statues in the round depicting front–facing male figures stepping
forward toward the viewer. Both figures are stiff in form with their arms at their sides and fists
clenched. Menkaure is made of graywacke and is ancient Egyptian in origin whereas Kouros
composed of marble and originates from ancient Greece. Menkaure's stature and posture reflect
ancient Egypt's religious beliefs at the time; Egyptian artists depicted their subjects to convey a
timeless stability so the subject's ka, or soul, would have an eternal home. This is shown in the fact
that even though Menkaure is stepping forward, his weight is not shifted forward on his left foot.
His feet also remain completely wedded to the block and there are

The Metropolitan Kuoros: The Menkaure And A Queen
1. The Menkaure and a Queen is dated 2548–2530 BCE. It stands in height of 4 feet 6 inches. This
sculpture was discovered underground of a room in the Valley Temple at the pyramid of Menkaure
of Giza. It's medium is greywacke. The Metropolitan Kuoros is dated 600 BCE. The height of this
statue is 6 feet 4 inches. This statue was discovered in Attica, Greece. It's medium is marble and
naxian.
2. When I look at The Menakure and a queen I see a Egyptian man and women. They are both
wearing head pieces. The woman is holding onto the man with one arm around his lower back and
her other arm holding onto his forearm. The man is holding something in his hands. Both arms are
to his side firmly as if he's holding something maybe heavy. The man's feet ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The similarities between the two statues are that that both the feet in the statues are placed one in
front of the other. Another is the men's hands are clenched tight. They both are wearing head pieces.
Both show off the rigidness of their bodies. Both the statues texture seems to be smooth. Both
statues mass is solid not hollow on the inside. They both were sculpted.
5. Some of the visual characteristics that the Greeks used were how both men have same body types.
They are also made them have the same muscular figure of the male. Made them to look prominent.
Both have a serious look on their faces made them to look important.
6. The Menkaure and a Queen has a lot of lines that form the sculpture. There are a lot of strong
vertical lines. And a lot of horizontal lines that counteract. It has a smooth to the touch texture. The
statue is a darker black which is considered Neutral Color Made of stone. It also has used closed
form with the hands, to give it a realism. The realism of this statue is like as if they are right
underneath the stone.
7. The Metropoitan Kouros is naked. The Statue Has lots of straight lines. It has sharp ridges. It also
uses a lot of the same shapes. Vertical lines that make up his body. It's light in color. Like ivory. Not
lifelike looking. Used closed form shape to make up the appearance of his big eyes. Symmetrical
patterns to make up his head

Response To Anavysos Kouros Analysis
This week I am choosing to respond to the Anavysos Kouros, a piece that in my perspective, appears
to be different from the sculptures found previous to the archaic period. This marbled sculpture
presents a new concept of a standing young, athletic and strong man that is represented as an ideal.
Compared to other models in previous eras (such as Egyptian art) where the human figure was
represented in a more constrained manner, I admire the way it illustrates the nature of the human
being, its freedom and its energy by its nudity. What also drew my attention is the fact that it was
found in a cemetery. It made me question the reaction people would have seeing a nude male
sculpture in a sacred and solemn environment like a cemetery. The pose

Examples Of Unconsciousness
Our consciousness are still in gray area for pairing sex, career and family even though women have
as equal rights as men in these days. According to Implicit Association Test (IAT), people made
more mistakes on a pair of Men with Family than a pair of Men with Career. The essence of my
evidence's argument is that people are more familiar with what they used to see or think just like an
example of Aeron Chair. Aaron Chairs are very comfortable and designed for people who are sitting
on it and working for hours. Unfortunately, people didn't like it so much because of its look. Another
example is that a professional musician, Abbie Conant who played trombone was not chosen for
solo trombone even though she passed the auditions with good grades. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
According to Getty's Kouros, the geologist examined the surface of the Kouros and after 14 months
after the investigation, they agreed to buy it. But the Kouros seemed something wrong in some
experts' eyes and they gave a few words each on Kouros during their first glance. For example, "I
am sorry to hear that.", "It was fresh.", "If you have not paid for it yet, don't.", "I felt as though there
was a glass between me and the work." Those words came out from their mouths in the first two
seconds when they saw the Kouros. They made thin–slicing the Kouros and they were right. It is not
because they were just lucky at guessing or they had some magic power, but because they combined
their well–trained rapid cognition, enough amount of live experience, ability of thin–slicing and
intuitive repulsive. That's the beautiful result of thin–slicing and intuitive

Human Body Sculpture In Ancient Greece And Rome
The ancient Greeks and Romans founded two of the western world's great civilizations. Being able
to produce an array of contributions to the arts, literature, theatre, politics, and philosophy. They
were both large conquerors around the Mediterranean sea. The Romans loved Greek culture and
even though they had copied Greek statues, paintings, and architecture; they also decided to adopt
the Greek gods. The gods were renamed to Jupiter, Neptune, and Venus. Unlike the Greeks who
looked for idealistic features in their sculptures. The Romans were more interested in portraiture of
real people, they sought for the true likeness of their subjects. The Romans also used their art as a
propaganda to promote a political agenda and to glorify emperors and their exploits. Starting with
the Greek artists who have accomplished at creating precisely what the society had urged them to
create. The creation of a truly realistic human body sculpture. The sculptures that were made looked
very lifelike and amazingly realistic. They have created and achieved their goal in using art as an
imitation of life. In Greece the athletes basically performed in nude. Male that were physically ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These free standing sculptures were life–sized and were normally made in marble. tHE greeks
created sculptures similar to the Egyptians, by the way they are stood upright, have their arms by
their sides, and legs were apart. Then they created the kouros and kore sculptures that stood upright
with their left foot in front, arms at their sides, and looking forward. Just as the kouros statue
seemed to be connected to Apollo, the kore represented Athena. The kore is also known as korai or
maidens that were female free standing sculpts. Kore were fully clothed unlike the kouros. They
seem to look more relaxed and always has an arm drawn–out

Difference Between Doryphoros
The sculpture Doryphoros was created by an artist that goes by the name of Polykleitos. Now,
Polykleitos' sculpture was made during the Early Classical Period, but it was merely a copy that was
found in Pompeii in 450–440 BCE. The original has been lost and it is thought to have been under
the rubble of the eruption of a volcano. I have also found sites saying the original is located is the
Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Napoli. So, I have had some confusion on distinguishing between
the original and this copy. The biggest difference between this one and the original is he is assumed
to be holding a spear in his left hand and draping it over his left shoulder. The style of this sculpture
I am a little torn on, I have seen where it is classified

Bruial of the Dead
Life and Death: Burial of the Dead The only thing in life that is one–hundred percent certain is
death. Humans go through life ignoring this ultimate fate until the day they are confronted. What a
civilization does with their deceased tells a lot about their culture and beliefs in an afterlife. Whether
a person is cremated or the body is preserved, whether they are buried in the ground or placed in a
tomb, and how their final place is decorated all show their cultures values and beliefs and what kind
of person they were. At the Getty Villa museum one piece called the Sarcophagus with Scenes from
the life of Achilles depicts how a Roman sarcophagus can show you their beliefs and customs.
The Sarcophagus with Scenes from the Life of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A person with a sarcophagus that has a scene of war might want to be show that they were great
warriors or conquerors in their life.
Another culture that influenced the Romans was the Greeks. The Sarcophagus has a scene of
Achilles life along the side and the way Achilles and the warriors are depicted follow the way the
Greeks depicted their warriors. The warriors along the side of the Sarcophagus show absolutely no
emotion even though there are in the middle of battle some are shown nude as well. This tradition of
depicting men like this comes from the Greek Kouros Statue .The Greek Kouros statues were
created as burial markers and evolved from there. The Kouros statues were carved in such a way to
display the human body in its most natural form, which is nude, and men of war were shown to be
strong and muscular and display no emotion on their face. These traits depict a virtuous man, a man
who displays wisdom, courage, and self–control. These virtues are depicted in all of Greek art and
the Romans took this and combined it with their own artwork giving us the beautiful carving along
the side of the Sarcophagus. In some Roman sarcophagi one could have the hero in the story
depicted like oneself which would then show that the person buried in this sarcophagus thought that
they were virtuous. One famous culture that practiced the use of sarcophagi was the Egyptians. An
example of an Egyptian sarcophagus is the

Troy Sivan Research Papers
Troye Sivan, who told us, "My youth is yours," has inadvertently snapped the wittiest, most erotic
gay selfie of the Millennium. As clever as anything Mapplethorpe shot, this picture, which freezes
Sivan's narcissistic youth in a moment of self–inspection and perhaps even admiration, makes good
on his popular lyric, even if he now pleads with the internet to wipe it from memory. But the internet
never forgets a pretty anus. The selfie is satire and sincere breakthrough, a reimagining of
narcissistic mirror–talk and a thrusting of taboo, subculture–confined "anality" into popular
awareness. Sivan's sphincter, blithely agape, is a clarion announcing the arrival of the youthful
homosexual anus as eye–catcher and eye–holder. The selfie seems to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
. .] The kouros stands heroically bare in Appollonian externality and visibility. Unlike two–
dimensional pharaonic sculptures, he invites the strolling spectator to admire him in the round."
Sivan as modern–day kouros has revived this artistic persona: his feline posture is a "self–
supporting" provocation, an erotics of anticlines and synclines; he seems as nonchalantly exposed as
a stretching cat, but this is his "polemic." The selfie is a liberation of all eyes: his, only one of which
is in frame but represents both as it coquettishly stares out at ours, and then ours in turn, which are
free to gaze into the virginal pinprick Sivan reflects back at us, two portals––mirror and anus––that
symbolize the topsy–turvy bildungsroman of gay young–adult sexuality. Backward talk: this is a
mirror language one side of which we can't readily apprehend. The mirror permits the illusion of a
kouros–in–the–round. His flippantly narcissistic "I look good" is a "self–supporting" statement of
fact. The beautiful narcissist inspires resentment by stating the obvious. In this picture, anality as an
erotics of back–talk is staged and lampooned. So much of anality happens behind one's back, an
unwitting communion between one's ass and an ogler's

Essay on Progression of the Kouroi
Progression of the Kouroi
What is a kouros? In Greek, kouros means a young man. In art, a kouros is a statue of a young nude
male who stands with his hands at his sides and one leg, usually his left, advanced.
Throughout the Archaic period, which dates from 610 B.C. to 480 B.C., the basic pose of kouroi
(plural for kouros) remained the same, though the anatomy of the figures gradually became more
naturalistic or true to life. The ideology that the Greek sculptors wanted to achieve greater
naturalism is proven through the progression of the kouroi during the period.
At a glance, three main features deem the Getty Kouros under the general classification of a kouros:
hands, hair, and feet. The hands are clenched into fists. They ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Despite this, the Kouros was put on display on October 1986. During the early nineties, a fake
marble torso that is similar to the Getty Kouros is discovered. Therefore, the fake torso was
purchased for research and the Kouros was removed from the display for reevaluation of the
previous studies. In May of 1992, the Kouros was displayed in Athens, Greece, at an international
conference on its authenticity. Although the majority of art historians and archeologists condemn it,
most of the scientists believe the Kouros to be authentic. Up to this day, the question of the Getty
Kouros' authenticity remains a mystery for the statue is still dated as "Greek, 530 B.C. or modern
forgery."
The controversy of the authenticity of the Getty Kouros will be addressed shortly after the
characterization of the kouros.
Kroisos, a kouros from a cemetery at Anavysos, most resembles the Getty Kouros. By comparing
the Getty Kouros shown at different angles with Kroisos a lot of similarities can be seen. The
placement of the feet on the base in relation to the position of the hands and the shoulders, as well as
details of the head, can help to determine whether a kouros turns to the left or right. This subtle
movement in either direction is found among all authentic kouroi. The bent (or broken) axis of the
left foot of the Getty Kouros is one of

Kritios Boy Contrapposto
The term contrapposto refers to an Italian word meaning counterpoise, and it is used to in the visual
arts industry to illustrate "a human figure standing with most of its weight on one foot so that its
shoulders and arms twist off–axis from the hips and the legs". It was an essential sculptural
development since it involves the use of the human body in the western art to express physiological
disposition. One of the legs is responsible for carrying the weight, and it is called the engaged leg
while the relaxed leg is referred to as the free leg. Besides, contrapposto creates an illusion of
movement in the past and the future. It is possible that the Kritios Boy with its incipient
contrapposto represents a calm, relaxed state of mind and evenness ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Doryphoros is one of the prominent iliac crests which is exaggerated at the lower abdomen making
it look ideal to the people the control of the architecture of the muscle was is far more rigorous.
Other features which made Doryphores to look more idealized to the people include smooth skin,
high cheekbones, straight nose, nor archaic smile, patterned hair and square jaw. The sculptures
depicted the people in various actions like the figure of athletes. Over the period, it continued to
change portraying modern athletes and specifically the bodybuilding

Greek Art Period and Comparison of Kroisos from, Anavysos...
Greek art took many ideas from Egypt and Mesopotamia however as the years passed they started to
develop and create their own unique style. This style was more realistic and natural visually. One of
their goals was for the viewer to believe they are seeing a moment standing still in time. You can see
this when you compare Kroisos from, Anavysos Greece, and Doryphorus from Pompeii, Italy. These
pieces are roughly dated 80 years apart however the difference between the two–forms are so
remarkable. This paper will be discussing and addressing the evolution of a more naturalistic art
form, from the statue of Kroisos compared to the statue of Doryphorus during the Greek art period.
At a first glance of the statues you may not see the dramatic differences between the two however
they were both approached in different ways to be created. They have different meanings yet both
were created to be more naturalistic than what came before it. In Anavysos, Greece a statue of a
Kouros was discovered dedicated to Kroisos. Kouros statues were male figures also known as
"youths" that were erected on graves as a gift for the gods and as a marker for these graves. None of
the statues were identical however you could see that the all had the same base image to be formed
from. This particular one was in honor of Kroisos who died a very noble death in battle in the front
lines so his family erected this statue. This piece is dated circa 530BCE and is 6' 4" high carved
from marble. This

Comparing The Greek And Greek Statues Of The Archaic Period
Something that jumped out at me from the reading was the subtle differences between the kore and
kouros statues of the Archaic period and those of the Early Classical Period. The Archaic Period
lasted from around 600 to 480 BCE. The kore and kouros statues of this time period obviously show
how they are older than the Early Classical statues because they resemble Egyptian sculpture more.
In Art: a Brief History by Marilyn Stokstad and Michael W. Cothren, the Anavysos Kouros, stands
with his fists clenched, arms at the side, one leg in front of the other, and the famous Archaic smile
on his face (107). The idea that clenched fists and one leg forward symbolizes power is interesting
to me, but I can see why they do it because it seems to symbolize

Kritios Boy Essay
Created sometime around 480 BCE, the marble sculpture Kritios Boy is a significant piece of
ancient Greek art. Although it was recovered in a mutilated state over one thousand years after its
creation, the sculpture still manages to showcase detail of the human body in a more naturalized
form than the similar pieces of art that had came before. This piece of artwork was created at a very
busy time in Greek history. Greece was in the midst of a war with Persia, and Athens was a pre–
Socratic society that was nearing the height of interest in philosophy. With that came the quest to
identify mankind's "natural" identity. The results of this quest was displayed in many pieces of
artwork. Kritios Boy was sculpted in the figure of a human male, and was quite distinct from similar
pieces of artwork of earlier Greek and Egyptian history. Kouros, from only forty–five years prior to
Kritios Boy, was much more closely related to the heavily idealized Egyptian sculptures like the
Triad of Mycerinas. Those earlier sculptures were similar in that ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Most noticeably in the way that the statue is standing. Rather than standing in the rigid stance of the
Kouros and others before, the figure is demonstrating a contrapposto stance, a more natural and
common way of standing that places the body's weight on one side of the body, with the left leg
standing straight, and the right one bent and relaxed. Looking up through the torso, one will see that
the hips are not aligned, contributing to the more relaxed and natural stance. This showcases the
progress made in the quest to represent the natural body, as it is a very common way for humans to
stand. Other features, such as proportion and muscle definition, place Kritios more towards the
natural side of the styleized–naturalized spectrum. Unlike the Kouros of 600 BCE, the Kritios's head
and torso correspond well with the rest of the body, and muscle and bone structure appear more

Ancient Greece: The Anavysos Kouros
The Anavysos Kouros, created around 530 B.C.E. in the Greek artistic period, depicts the religious
aspect of Greece during the Ancient Mediterranean era. Arranged in "polis" (city states), the citizens
of Greece followed this pre–dominant method of political organization. Aristocratic rule managed
the Greek cities. The extremely urbanized society participated in heavy trade, which allowed the
Greek economy to prosper. The religion of Ancient Greece emphasized multiple gods, worship, and
afterlife. Thus, the Greeks believed in the existence of many gods and goddesses, which reflected
the polytheistic nature of Greece. Zeus served as the king of the gods in the hierarchy of Greek
religion and twelve major gods made up the Greek throne, coexisting with many minor gods. Some
deities controlled elements of the world such as the sky, or the sea, while others controlled a more
abstract aspect such as the hearth. Conclusively, The Greeks believed that the gods took the rituals
and sacrifices as a gift as public festivals honored all the gods and hoped it would reap success in
their lives. As a result, religion played a large role in the society of Ancient Greece. The Anavysos ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Both sculptures served as an offering to sanctuaries of Apollo. As a representation of the great god
of music, both shrines and temples housed the great sculptures. Additionally, the Anavysos Kouros
can be attributed to Doryphoros (Spear Bearer). Both figures share similarities as the Doryphoros is
essentially a Roman adaptation of Greek figurative sculptures. The Doryphoros continues the use of
marble as bronze's value and ability to be melted down hindered the implementation of bronze in the
Roman sculptures. Both the Anavysos Kouros and the Doryphoros strays away from the stiffness of
the archaic period sculptures, instead, using abstract curves and softer tones in the nude

Characteristics Of Art : King Menkaure And New York Kouros
I do not have ingredients to make a sandwich, so I will eat a banana muffin from Henry's Food
Court, instead. 2. I think Growth is vegetable growth because it reminds me of an abnormal growth
of a root vegetable such as carrots. The round bumps on the body of the sculpture look like mutation
from a vegetable or fruit. This work possesses feminine characteristics because of the round and
smooth form. There are no sharp edges poking out. It's in a silky and gentle shape. Even the material
is marble, the overall sculpture looks light and balanced. This is a non–objective sculpture. This
work evokes cool emotion. The surface is matte and white with some gray strings. The bumps are
not in organized fashion. It is not chaotic, and somewhat minimalistic. At most times when I touch a
marble, it feels cool on my hand. 3. King Menkaure and New York Kouros both have a symmetrical
body shape and made by carving from a stone. They have proportioned body and geometric body
parts. The two men have clinched fist and the left foot stepping forward. The body stance is stiff and
rigid The arms are closed to the thighs. The shoulders are wider than the waist. The Egyptian
sculpture is made from a slab of marble. King Menkaure wears the traditional accessories while the
Greek sculpture is nude. The face separates King Menkaure and Kouros. I have seen before the
Egyptian sculptures numerous times, and the face is no different from the other Egyptian sculptures.
Greek Kouros is a representing a

Classical Ideal Summary
In the first part of the video, The Classical Ideal, the video describes the characteristics and
examples of Greek art. The art we recognize as Greek was produced between 2,000 and 3,000 years
ago. In early Greece, art was heavily intertwined with its culture and religion. Art forms, such as
architects and statues, expressed the early Greek culture and their values. For an example, the
ancient Greeks use statues to portray their ideal gender characteristics. The Kouros statue depicts the
men as naked and bold. Furthermore, the statue depicts men standing free and proud, in an
autonomous fashion. The statue also depicts the men as beautiful and youthful. All these
characteristics illustrated from Kouros gave us insight on what the ancient Greek culture values in
the male gender. On the other hand, Kore (a female version of Kouros) depicts the female gender as
beautiful, timid and serene. Kore indicates what the ancient Greek society values in the female
gender. Both Kouros and Kore serve two purposes and functions. Firstly, the statues were used as
tokens for the grave. Secondly, the statues were used as sacrifices to the gods. The second function
shows the interweaving of Greek art and Greek religion. This intertwining of art and ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even today, arches with similar style of that of the Romans could still be seen today. I remembered
visiting Princeton University last summer. I remember seeing arches everywhere within the
Princeton University's campus. The entrance to some of the buildings were massive arches that
created tunnels. The catholic–style church in the center of the campus also contained many arches as
its foundation. I believe that, through the use of arches, Princeton university built a campus that was
both elegant and reliable. One question I would pose would be: Can you think of any modern
architectural ideas that are as innovating as the Roman

Kritios Boy Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jacqueline Thomas

More from Jacqueline Thomas (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Kritios Boy Essay