KoboToolbox, Google Forms, and Glide no code app are compared for ease of use, customization options, automation/reporting, and other features. KoboToolbox generally offers more advanced and customizable options. It has easy deployment without technical knowledge required. KoboToolbox offers extensive customization, advanced automation/reporting, data cleaning/validation, offline data collection, and security features not found in the other tools. While all are free, KoboToolbox's features make it most suitable for complex data collection projects.

1. KoboToolbox vs Google Form vs
Glide no code app
Presented by;

2. Ease of deployment and Usage
 KoboToolbox is easy to deploy, with no technical knowledge required. The user-friendly interface
makes it easy for users to navigate and complete tasks.
 Google Forms is also easy to set up, but the interface may not be as user-friendly as KoboToolbox.
 Glide no code app requires some knowledge of app development, making it more challenging for
users to set up.

3. Customization
 KoboToolbox offers extensive customization options, allowing you to create forms that suit your
specific needs. Google Forms also offers a range of customization options, but is limited in terms of
design options. Glide No Code App is primarily designed for mobile-based forms, with limited
customization options.

4. Automation and reporting
 KoboToolbox offers advanced automation features, including automatic data syncing and alerts for
new submissions, which are not available in Google Forms and Glide no code app.
 KoboToolbox offers more advanced reporting options with real-time data visualization and analysis
tools than Google Forms and Glide no code app.

5. Database and data cleaning
 KoboToolbox and Google Forms allow users to store data in their cloud databases, while Glide no
code app requires users to integrate with a third-party database provider.
 KoboToolbox offers advanced data cleaning and validation options that are not available in Google
Forms and Glide no code app.

6. collaboration (How many agents to input data)
 All three platforms support multiple users to input data. KoboToolbox and Google Forms offer
collaborative features that allow multiple users to work on the same form at the same time. Glide
no code app requires users to manually grant access to other users to work on the same app.
 All three tools offer collaboration features that allow multiple users to work on the same form.
KoboToolbox has advanced collaboration features, including sharing and permission settings.
Google Forms also offers collaboration features, but is limited in terms of sharing and permission
settings. Glide No Code App offers basic collaboration features.

7. Glitches
 KoboToolbox is a stable platform with few glitches reported.
 Google Forms may experience more glitches due to the number of users on the platform.
 Glide no code app is relatively new and may experience more glitches and bugs
 Overall, KoboToolbox and Google Forms are both stable and reliable platforms that rarely
encounter technical issues. Glide no code app may experience more technical issues due to its
relatively new status, but its support team is available to resolve issues promptly. Users should
ensure that they have the latest software updates, use compatible devices and web browsers, and
contact support teams for assistance when encountering technical issues.

8. Security of the data from hacking
 Security is a critical concern when it comes to data collection and management. Let's take a closer look at the security features offered by
each of the three platforms.
 KoboToolbox: KoboToolbox takes security very seriously, and it offers multiple layers of protection for user data. First, all data is
encrypted both in transit and at rest, ensuring that it remains secure at all times. Additionally, KoboToolbox has several security measures
in place, including a two-factor authentication system, that requires users to enter a verification code sent to their mobile device or email
to access their accounts. This ensures that only authorized users can access sensitive data. KoboToolbox also regularly audits its servers
and systems to identify and address vulnerabilities and threats.
 Google Forms: Google Forms also takes security seriously and encrypts data in transit and at rest. Additionally, Google Forms offers two-
factor authentication, which requires users to provide an extra layer of verification before they can access their accounts. Google Forms
also provides regular security updates to ensure that users are protected against emerging threats and vulnerabilities.
 Glide no code app: Glide no code app also provides encryption for data in transit and at rest. However, it does not currently offer two-
factor authentication, which means that users rely solely on their login credentials to protect their accounts. This could potentially be a
security risk, especially for users handling sensitive data.
 Overall, KoboToolbox and Google Forms provide stronger security measures than Glide no code app. However, it's important to note that
security is a shared responsibility between the platform provider and the user. Users must take necessary precautions to ensure that their
data remains secure, such as using strong passwords and not sharing login credentials with others.

9. Access Management (Agents, Analyst, Super
admins to create roles, Auditor)
 All three platforms offer access management features, allowing users to assign different roles to
team members based on their needs. KoboToolbox offers more advanced access management
options with the ability to assign user permissions and roles for different projects.

10. Data ingestion and profiting
 KoboToolbox and Google Forms allow users to easily import data from external sources, while Glide
no code app requires users to integrate with a third-party service to import data.
 KoboToolbox offers advanced data ingestion options such as offline data collection and mobile
data collection.

11. Data modeling and transformation
 KoboToolbox offers advanced data modeling and transformation features such as merging datasets
and pivoting data, which are not available in Google Forms and Glide no code app.

12. Price/Cost
 KoboToolbox and Google Forms are free to use, while Glide no code app offers a free trial and paid
plans based on usage. However, KoboToolbox's advanced features make it a more cost-effective
choice for complex data collection projects.

13. Online and offline Usage
 KoboToolbox offers offline data collection features, allowing users to collect data without an
internet connection. Google Forms and Glide no code app require an internet connection to use.

14. Integration
 KoboToolbox and Google Forms offer integration with external services such as Google Sheets and
Zapier, while Glide no code app offers integration with third-party databases and services.

15. Customer support
 All three platforms offer customer support through email and online help centers. KoboToolbox
offers additional support through its community forum.

16. Conclusion
 In conclusion, KoboToolbox stands out as the best choice for data collection and management,
offering advanced features such as automation, advanced reporting, data cleaning, and security
options that are not available in Google Forms and Glide no code app. KoboToolbox also offers
more advanced access management options, offline data collection, data modeling, and
transformation features, making it more suitable for complex data collection projects. While all
three platforms offer free options, KoboToolbox's advanced features make it a more cost-effective
choice for complex data collection projects. Additionally, KoboToolbox offers customer support
through email, online help centers, and its community forum, making it easier for users to get help
when they need it. Overall, KoboToolbox is a reliable, secure, and easy-to-use platform that
provides the flexibility and advanced features needed for successful data collection and
management.