The Result of Government Gone Mad. This is still going on. These are the same officials who I took to Court and they simply ignored it and nobody made them.
This document is a court ruling on an appeal from a civil rights lawsuit brought by the Walczyk family against members of the Farmington Police Department. It summarizes a longstanding property dispute between the Walczyks and a development corporation. It then describes events leading up to the police obtaining arrest and search warrants for Thomas Walczyk based on comments he made about potentially taking matters into his own hands regarding the dispute. The court must determine if the police were justified in their actions or if the Walczyks' civil rights were violated.
PA Superior Court Decision: Northern Forests II, Inc. v. Keta Realty CompanyMarcellus Drilling News
This document summarizes a court case regarding a 1989 default judgment obtained by Northern Forests II, Inc. (NF) in a quiet title action. In 2013, the trial court struck the default judgment as void for lack of proper service on the original defendants. NF then filed an amended complaint alleging adverse possession. The trial court sustained preliminary objections and dismissed the amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action. NF and Ultra Resources, Inc. appealed the dismissal.
This document summarizes a court memorandum regarding a motion for reconsideration in a case between Frederick Fink and Sylvia LaSelva. The court had previously ruled that Fink's claim against LaSelva for money received as trustee of a trust was barred by res judicata based on prior bankruptcy settlements. However, the bankruptcy court later found that the prior settlements did not resolve issues regarding the validity of an assignment of trust interests or LaSelva's entitlement to dividends received as trustee. Based on the bankruptcy court's comments, the court here allows reconsideration of its previous ruling, finding the bankruptcy court was in a better position to understand the scope of the prior litigation.
This document summarizes a legal case between Stephen Gaggero and Anna Marie Yura regarding an agreement for Gaggero to purchase property owned by a trust for which Yura became successor trustee. The primary issue was whether Gaggero and the previous trustee, Fredrick Harris, had agreed on conditions, covenants and restrictions (CC&Rs) for the property before Harris's death. Following a trial, the court found in favor of Yura, determining that Gaggero and Harris had not finalized the CC&Rs. Gaggero appealed aspects of the judgment and related post-judgment orders.
Decision by U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd on Force Majeure Case in New Yo...Marcellus Drilling News
A decision issued by Judge David Hurd in a case of landowners from Broome and Tioga Counties in New York State against Chesapeake Energy and Statoilhydro. Chesapeake is attempting to extend leases on property for gas drilling claiming that the moratorium in New York has stopped them from drilling. Landowners claim the leases were signed long before horizontal hydraulic fracturing of shale was done and that Chesapeake could have drilled, conventionally, any time they chose to.
The Result of Government Gone Mad. This is still going on. These are the same officials who I took to Court and they simply ignored it and nobody made them.
This document is a court ruling on an appeal from a civil rights lawsuit brought by the Walczyk family against members of the Farmington Police Department. It summarizes a longstanding property dispute between the Walczyks and a development corporation. It then describes events leading up to the police obtaining arrest and search warrants for Thomas Walczyk based on comments he made about potentially taking matters into his own hands regarding the dispute. The court must determine if the police were justified in their actions or if the Walczyks' civil rights were violated.
PA Superior Court Decision: Northern Forests II, Inc. v. Keta Realty CompanyMarcellus Drilling News
This document summarizes a court case regarding a 1989 default judgment obtained by Northern Forests II, Inc. (NF) in a quiet title action. In 2013, the trial court struck the default judgment as void for lack of proper service on the original defendants. NF then filed an amended complaint alleging adverse possession. The trial court sustained preliminary objections and dismissed the amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action. NF and Ultra Resources, Inc. appealed the dismissal.
This document summarizes a court memorandum regarding a motion for reconsideration in a case between Frederick Fink and Sylvia LaSelva. The court had previously ruled that Fink's claim against LaSelva for money received as trustee of a trust was barred by res judicata based on prior bankruptcy settlements. However, the bankruptcy court later found that the prior settlements did not resolve issues regarding the validity of an assignment of trust interests or LaSelva's entitlement to dividends received as trustee. Based on the bankruptcy court's comments, the court here allows reconsideration of its previous ruling, finding the bankruptcy court was in a better position to understand the scope of the prior litigation.
This document summarizes a legal case between Stephen Gaggero and Anna Marie Yura regarding an agreement for Gaggero to purchase property owned by a trust for which Yura became successor trustee. The primary issue was whether Gaggero and the previous trustee, Fredrick Harris, had agreed on conditions, covenants and restrictions (CC&Rs) for the property before Harris's death. Following a trial, the court found in favor of Yura, determining that Gaggero and Harris had not finalized the CC&Rs. Gaggero appealed aspects of the judgment and related post-judgment orders.
Decision by U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd on Force Majeure Case in New Yo...Marcellus Drilling News
A decision issued by Judge David Hurd in a case of landowners from Broome and Tioga Counties in New York State against Chesapeake Energy and Statoilhydro. Chesapeake is attempting to extend leases on property for gas drilling claiming that the moratorium in New York has stopped them from drilling. Landowners claim the leases were signed long before horizontal hydraulic fracturing of shale was done and that Chesapeake could have drilled, conventionally, any time they chose to.
Fisker's lawsuit against insurance companykatiefehren
A lawsuit filed by Fisker against insurance company XL for denying its claim when 338 Karmas were lost in Sandy flooding, which had a value of $33 million.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a 5-0 ruling last week that upholds the practice of title washing in the Keystone State. Prior to 1948 if mineral rights that had been separated were not properly recorded (it was incumbent on the owner of the subsurface rights to ensure the sale was recorded at the assessor's office), and the surface land was later sold, both the mineral rights (subsurface) and the surface land became part of the sale. That, in essence, was title washing. After 1948 a law prevented this from happening, so such cases only apply to land sold before 1948.
Detective Doug Beard declares that Serhat Daniel Gumrukcu is suspected of multiple felonies based on an investigation. Gumrukcu is suspected of defrauding Ersin Akyuz of $930,000 in a real estate scam involving a property on Dicks Street in West Hollywood. He is also suspected of depositing bad checks totaling $11,700 at Wells Fargo, causing the bank to lose money. Additionally, Gumrukcu is suspected of defrauding Gregory Gac and his company Quadrant Financial of $600,000 by depositing bad checks. Based on the losses exceeding $1 million, Beard requests the court preserve up to $3 million of
1) The plaintiff sought a declaration that a deed transferring land to the defendants be declared void, alleging it was obtained through fraud. The trial court ruled in the plaintiff's favor.
2) On appeal, the defendants argued the causes of action were misjoined. However, the court found the plaintiff only raised issues regarding invalidating the deed, not declaring title.
3) The court also held that even if both causes of action were raised, this would be allowed. Declaring a deed invalid is consequential to declaring title. The standard of proof in allegations of fraud is a balance of probabilities.
This document summarizes an appellate court decision regarding a land dispute between Mercedes Moralidad and the spouses Diosdado and Arlene Pernes. Moralidad owned a parcel of land and allowed the Pernes family to build a house on it and stay as long as they liked. However, relations soured over time. Moralidad filed an unlawful detainer case to eject the Pernes from the property. The lower courts ruled in favor of the Pernes, finding they had the right to remain until reimbursed for home improvements. The appellate court affirmed but the Supreme Court reversed, finding the usufruct granted to the Pernes had been terminated by their hostile relations, allowing
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of the Philippines decision regarding two complaints of misconduct filed against Attorney Arturo B. Astorga. The first complaint alleges that Astorga, acting as administrator of an estate based on a power of attorney, disturbed the peaceful possession of a property by the complainants that they had occupied for over 40 years. The second complaint alleges that Astorga sold the same property to one of the complainants without proper authority to administer the estate. The court must determine if Astorga is guilty of conduct unbecoming a member of the bar based on these complaints.
This document summarizes a court case regarding a same-sex couple challenging California's Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage. The court granted California's motion to dismiss, finding that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge Proposition 8. Specifically, the court found that the plaintiffs did not demonstrate a concrete and particularized injury, or that their injury could be redressed by a favorable court decision, which are both requirements for standing. This was the second time the plaintiffs had brought similar challenges to the court regarding same-sex marriage bans.
This document is an opposition to a motion to dismiss or transfer venue filed by the defendants. It summarizes relevant facts establishing personal jurisdiction over the defendants in Nevada. It describes the plaintiff Cox & Associates as a Nevada company recruited by the defendant Dillman Equipment to market and sell its equipment in Nevada. It details numerous contacts the defendants had with Nevada, including sales trips, equipment servicing, trade show attendance, and communications regarding marketing in Nevada. The document argues these contacts satisfy the test for personal jurisdiction over the defendants in Nevada.
This document summarizes a court case between First American Title Insurance Company, Winnebago County Title Company, and TCF Bank regarding a mortgage on a property owned by Patricia Bartholomew. TCF Bank held the first mortgage on the property as a revolving line of credit. Winnebago acted as an agent in a second mortgage taken out by Bartholomew. Winnebago paid off the TCF Bank mortgage but TCF did not release its lien. Bartholomew then took out more funds through the revolving credit and defaulted. The court found that TCF Bank was not legally required to release the lien until the revolving credit was cancelled by Bartholomew. However
I don't know that I have an opinion about this yet but there are other documents that I will upload that will need to be looked at as well to come to a conclusion.
This document describes a Pennsylvania Superior Court case regarding whether a defendant, Thomas Druce, should receive credit toward his sentence for time spent on bail pending appeal. Druce was subject to electronic home monitoring and an overnight curfew as conditions of his bail. The court affirmed the lower court's denial of credit, finding that electronic monitoring and a curfew do not constitute "custody" under the relevant statute for receiving sentencing credit. The court examined the rules of Druce's electronic monitoring program and determined it did not exert sufficient control or restraint to be considered custody. Druce also challenged the legality of his sentence under Blakely v. Washington, though the lower court did not address this issue.
This document summarizes a court case from the Pennsylvania Superior Court regarding whether a defendant, Thomas Druce, should receive credit toward his sentence for time spent on bail pending appeal. While on bail, Druce was subject to electronic home monitoring and an overnight curfew. The court considered two issues: 1) whether Druce was entitled to credit for time spent on bail and 2) whether his sentence was illegal under Blakely v. Washington regarding judicial fact-finding of aggravating factors. The court affirmed the denial of credit for time on bail and considered the Blakely issue despite it being raised for the first time on appeal, as legality of sentence can be reviewed at any time.
The Estate of Elizabeth Haynes Urquhart vs. American Regional_ Earl R. Davis ...Earl R. Davis
This turnover action is untimely because Elizabeth Urquhart died in 2005. The statute of
limitations in a discovery or turnover proceeding is governed by the CPLR. See SCPA § 102 (“The
CPLR and other laws applicable to practice and procedure apply in the surrogate’s court except
where other procedure is provided by this act.”). A proceeding “commenced pursuant to SCPA §
2103 has been likened to a replevin action, which has a statute of limitations of three years.” If you are interested to know about the case, get in touch with Earl R. Davis.
Notice of Claim filed 12/5/18; Nicholas H. Belsito v. County of Erie, Erie County Sheriff's Department, Deputy Kennth P. Achtyl and Deputy James W. Flowers
Charles D. Hoover and Martha L. Hoover conveyed ownership of a property located at Lot 14, Block A, of The Blue Springs Subdivision in Todd County, Wisconsin to Doris L. Brooks and James C. Brooks for $98,000. The property is subject to the current year's property taxes and an existing mortgage held by First Federal Savings and Loan Association that Doris L. Brooks and James C. Brooks agreed to assume. Charles D. Hoover and Martha L. Hoover warrant they have clear title to transfer the property to Doris L. Brooks and James C. Brooks as joint tenants with right of survivorship.
Sample complaint for fraudulent transfer in CaliforniaLegalDocsPro
This sample complaint for fraudulent transfer in California includes a cause of action under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act found in Civil Code section 3439 et seq., and also includes causes of action for common law fraudulent transfer as well as violations of the California bulk sale law. The sample document on which this preview is based is 10 pages and includes brief instructions and a verification. The author is a freelance paralegal that has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and also collected unpaid California judgments for over 20 years and has used this sample for many years.
AMENDED MOTION TO STRIKE OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARIFinni Rice
This document is an amended motion to strike an opposition brief filed in the Supreme Court of the United States. The petitioner, Kimberly Cox, argues that the opposition brief should be stricken for several reasons, including that the entities filing the opposition, NewRez LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon, lack standing because they were not named as respondents in the petition and were not involved in the underlying legal proceedings. Cox also argues that the corporate disclosure filed with the opposition is incomplete and misleading. The motion provides detailed arguments supporting Cox's position that the opposition brief should be stricken from the record.
Supporting documentation for the Motion to add 200 new plaintiffs to the Armando Montelongo Lawsuit. This outlines how attempts to Arbitrate the case failed due to Montelongo refusing to follow the American Arbitration Association Rules, thus they declined to arbitrate the case and asked he remove their name from clauses in the contract. In addition, new plaintiff's have approached the case with similar details of fraud. A synopsis of the entire suit is at http://www.jeannorton.com/armando-montelongo-rico-doubles/
What is the role of financial management in business success by Earl R. Davi...Earl R. Davis
Earl R. Davis claims that bankers can come in to assist by offering the initial cash required without demanding an obscene amount in profit in return. Businesses frequently acknowledge that they have enormous, possibly very lucrative contracts that, when fulfilled, will produce significant profits.
How To Invest Successfully | Earl R. DavisEarl R. Davis
This document provides advice for profitable long-term investing. It stresses the importance of setting clear investment goals and expectations to avoid emotional reactions if returns are not immediate. It also recommends educating yourself on investments, reinvesting earnings to benefit from compound growth over time, diversifying investments to manage risk, and controlling the impulse to invest entire sums in single opportunities with uncertain outcomes. Overall, the key advice is to invest strategically rather than speculatively for best results.
More Related Content
Similar to Know about the case of Herman Durand filed by Earl R. Davis
Fisker's lawsuit against insurance companykatiefehren
A lawsuit filed by Fisker against insurance company XL for denying its claim when 338 Karmas were lost in Sandy flooding, which had a value of $33 million.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a 5-0 ruling last week that upholds the practice of title washing in the Keystone State. Prior to 1948 if mineral rights that had been separated were not properly recorded (it was incumbent on the owner of the subsurface rights to ensure the sale was recorded at the assessor's office), and the surface land was later sold, both the mineral rights (subsurface) and the surface land became part of the sale. That, in essence, was title washing. After 1948 a law prevented this from happening, so such cases only apply to land sold before 1948.
Detective Doug Beard declares that Serhat Daniel Gumrukcu is suspected of multiple felonies based on an investigation. Gumrukcu is suspected of defrauding Ersin Akyuz of $930,000 in a real estate scam involving a property on Dicks Street in West Hollywood. He is also suspected of depositing bad checks totaling $11,700 at Wells Fargo, causing the bank to lose money. Additionally, Gumrukcu is suspected of defrauding Gregory Gac and his company Quadrant Financial of $600,000 by depositing bad checks. Based on the losses exceeding $1 million, Beard requests the court preserve up to $3 million of
1) The plaintiff sought a declaration that a deed transferring land to the defendants be declared void, alleging it was obtained through fraud. The trial court ruled in the plaintiff's favor.
2) On appeal, the defendants argued the causes of action were misjoined. However, the court found the plaintiff only raised issues regarding invalidating the deed, not declaring title.
3) The court also held that even if both causes of action were raised, this would be allowed. Declaring a deed invalid is consequential to declaring title. The standard of proof in allegations of fraud is a balance of probabilities.
This document summarizes an appellate court decision regarding a land dispute between Mercedes Moralidad and the spouses Diosdado and Arlene Pernes. Moralidad owned a parcel of land and allowed the Pernes family to build a house on it and stay as long as they liked. However, relations soured over time. Moralidad filed an unlawful detainer case to eject the Pernes from the property. The lower courts ruled in favor of the Pernes, finding they had the right to remain until reimbursed for home improvements. The appellate court affirmed but the Supreme Court reversed, finding the usufruct granted to the Pernes had been terminated by their hostile relations, allowing
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of the Philippines decision regarding two complaints of misconduct filed against Attorney Arturo B. Astorga. The first complaint alleges that Astorga, acting as administrator of an estate based on a power of attorney, disturbed the peaceful possession of a property by the complainants that they had occupied for over 40 years. The second complaint alleges that Astorga sold the same property to one of the complainants without proper authority to administer the estate. The court must determine if Astorga is guilty of conduct unbecoming a member of the bar based on these complaints.
This document summarizes a court case regarding a same-sex couple challenging California's Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage. The court granted California's motion to dismiss, finding that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge Proposition 8. Specifically, the court found that the plaintiffs did not demonstrate a concrete and particularized injury, or that their injury could be redressed by a favorable court decision, which are both requirements for standing. This was the second time the plaintiffs had brought similar challenges to the court regarding same-sex marriage bans.
This document is an opposition to a motion to dismiss or transfer venue filed by the defendants. It summarizes relevant facts establishing personal jurisdiction over the defendants in Nevada. It describes the plaintiff Cox & Associates as a Nevada company recruited by the defendant Dillman Equipment to market and sell its equipment in Nevada. It details numerous contacts the defendants had with Nevada, including sales trips, equipment servicing, trade show attendance, and communications regarding marketing in Nevada. The document argues these contacts satisfy the test for personal jurisdiction over the defendants in Nevada.
This document summarizes a court case between First American Title Insurance Company, Winnebago County Title Company, and TCF Bank regarding a mortgage on a property owned by Patricia Bartholomew. TCF Bank held the first mortgage on the property as a revolving line of credit. Winnebago acted as an agent in a second mortgage taken out by Bartholomew. Winnebago paid off the TCF Bank mortgage but TCF did not release its lien. Bartholomew then took out more funds through the revolving credit and defaulted. The court found that TCF Bank was not legally required to release the lien until the revolving credit was cancelled by Bartholomew. However
I don't know that I have an opinion about this yet but there are other documents that I will upload that will need to be looked at as well to come to a conclusion.
This document describes a Pennsylvania Superior Court case regarding whether a defendant, Thomas Druce, should receive credit toward his sentence for time spent on bail pending appeal. Druce was subject to electronic home monitoring and an overnight curfew as conditions of his bail. The court affirmed the lower court's denial of credit, finding that electronic monitoring and a curfew do not constitute "custody" under the relevant statute for receiving sentencing credit. The court examined the rules of Druce's electronic monitoring program and determined it did not exert sufficient control or restraint to be considered custody. Druce also challenged the legality of his sentence under Blakely v. Washington, though the lower court did not address this issue.
This document summarizes a court case from the Pennsylvania Superior Court regarding whether a defendant, Thomas Druce, should receive credit toward his sentence for time spent on bail pending appeal. While on bail, Druce was subject to electronic home monitoring and an overnight curfew. The court considered two issues: 1) whether Druce was entitled to credit for time spent on bail and 2) whether his sentence was illegal under Blakely v. Washington regarding judicial fact-finding of aggravating factors. The court affirmed the denial of credit for time on bail and considered the Blakely issue despite it being raised for the first time on appeal, as legality of sentence can be reviewed at any time.
The Estate of Elizabeth Haynes Urquhart vs. American Regional_ Earl R. Davis ...Earl R. Davis
This turnover action is untimely because Elizabeth Urquhart died in 2005. The statute of
limitations in a discovery or turnover proceeding is governed by the CPLR. See SCPA § 102 (“The
CPLR and other laws applicable to practice and procedure apply in the surrogate’s court except
where other procedure is provided by this act.”). A proceeding “commenced pursuant to SCPA §
2103 has been likened to a replevin action, which has a statute of limitations of three years.” If you are interested to know about the case, get in touch with Earl R. Davis.
Notice of Claim filed 12/5/18; Nicholas H. Belsito v. County of Erie, Erie County Sheriff's Department, Deputy Kennth P. Achtyl and Deputy James W. Flowers
Charles D. Hoover and Martha L. Hoover conveyed ownership of a property located at Lot 14, Block A, of The Blue Springs Subdivision in Todd County, Wisconsin to Doris L. Brooks and James C. Brooks for $98,000. The property is subject to the current year's property taxes and an existing mortgage held by First Federal Savings and Loan Association that Doris L. Brooks and James C. Brooks agreed to assume. Charles D. Hoover and Martha L. Hoover warrant they have clear title to transfer the property to Doris L. Brooks and James C. Brooks as joint tenants with right of survivorship.
Sample complaint for fraudulent transfer in CaliforniaLegalDocsPro
This sample complaint for fraudulent transfer in California includes a cause of action under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act found in Civil Code section 3439 et seq., and also includes causes of action for common law fraudulent transfer as well as violations of the California bulk sale law. The sample document on which this preview is based is 10 pages and includes brief instructions and a verification. The author is a freelance paralegal that has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and also collected unpaid California judgments for over 20 years and has used this sample for many years.
AMENDED MOTION TO STRIKE OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARIFinni Rice
This document is an amended motion to strike an opposition brief filed in the Supreme Court of the United States. The petitioner, Kimberly Cox, argues that the opposition brief should be stricken for several reasons, including that the entities filing the opposition, NewRez LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon, lack standing because they were not named as respondents in the petition and were not involved in the underlying legal proceedings. Cox also argues that the corporate disclosure filed with the opposition is incomplete and misleading. The motion provides detailed arguments supporting Cox's position that the opposition brief should be stricken from the record.
Supporting documentation for the Motion to add 200 new plaintiffs to the Armando Montelongo Lawsuit. This outlines how attempts to Arbitrate the case failed due to Montelongo refusing to follow the American Arbitration Association Rules, thus they declined to arbitrate the case and asked he remove their name from clauses in the contract. In addition, new plaintiff's have approached the case with similar details of fraud. A synopsis of the entire suit is at http://www.jeannorton.com/armando-montelongo-rico-doubles/
Similar to Know about the case of Herman Durand filed by Earl R. Davis (20)
What is the role of financial management in business success by Earl R. Davi...Earl R. Davis
Earl R. Davis claims that bankers can come in to assist by offering the initial cash required without demanding an obscene amount in profit in return. Businesses frequently acknowledge that they have enormous, possibly very lucrative contracts that, when fulfilled, will produce significant profits.
How To Invest Successfully | Earl R. DavisEarl R. Davis
This document provides advice for profitable long-term investing. It stresses the importance of setting clear investment goals and expectations to avoid emotional reactions if returns are not immediate. It also recommends educating yourself on investments, reinvesting earnings to benefit from compound growth over time, diversifying investments to manage risk, and controlling the impulse to invest entire sums in single opportunities with uncertain outcomes. Overall, the key advice is to invest strategically rather than speculatively for best results.
How do you define a successful business? Earl R. DavisEarl R. Davis
Earl R. Davis believes that some marketplaces are more competitive than others. If you try to enter an industry that is already saturated, you will quickly have to compete on price to get clients. It's challenging to grow when you're battling for every morsel of nourishment. Again, do some demand research before making a decision.
Earl Rasheed Davis against New York City Department of Finance.pdfEarl R. Davis
Earl Rasheed Davis petitions the court for an order pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR issuing a writ of mandamus compelling respondents to immediately release and record certain real property deeds timely and lawfully submitted by petitioner. To know more about this case, just get in touch with Earl Rasheed Davis.
Earl R. Davis Suit case against Herman Durand and Olga DurandEarl R. Davis
Herman Durand died on or about January 25, 2018. [R192] After Herman Durand's death, Herman Durand and Olga Durand continued to be listed as the owners of the property, by the New York City
Department of Finance, and the mailing address for bills remained Herman Durand at the Property. To know about the whole case, see this PDF.
Contributi dei parlamentari del PD - Contributi L. 3/2019Partito democratico
DI SEGUITO SONO PUBBLICATI, AI SENSI DELL'ART. 11 DELLA LEGGE N. 3/2019, GLI IMPORTI RICEVUTI DALL'ENTRATA IN VIGORE DELLA SUDDETTA NORMA (31/01/2019) E FINO AL MESE SOLARE ANTECEDENTE QUELLO DELLA PUBBLICAZIONE SUL PRESENTE SITO
Working with data is a challenge for many organizations. Nonprofits in particular may need to collect and analyze sensitive, incomplete, and/or biased historical data about people. In this talk, Dr. Cori Faklaris of UNC Charlotte provides an overview of current AI capabilities and weaknesses to consider when integrating current AI technologies into the data workflow. The talk is organized around three takeaways: (1) For better or sometimes worse, AI provides you with “infinite interns.” (2) Give people permission & guardrails to learn what works with these “interns” and what doesn’t. (3) Create a roadmap for adding in more AI to assist nonprofit work, along with strategies for bias mitigation.
Monitoring Health for the SDGs - Global Health Statistics 2024 - WHOChristina Parmionova
The 2024 World Health Statistics edition reviews more than 50 health-related indicators from the Sustainable Development Goals and WHO’s Thirteenth General Programme of Work. It also highlights the findings from the Global health estimates 2021, notably the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on life expectancy and healthy life expectancy.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Food safety, prepare for the unexpected - So what can be done in order to be ready to address food safety, food Consumers, food producers and manufacturers, food transporters, food businesses, food retailers can ...
RFP for Reno's Community Assistance CenterThis Is Reno
Property appraisals completed in May for downtown Reno’s Community Assistance and Triage Centers (CAC) reveal that repairing the buildings to bring them back into service would cost an estimated $10.1 million—nearly four times the amount previously reported by city staff.
Combined Illegal, Unregulated and Unreported (IUU) Vessel List.Christina Parmionova
The best available, up-to-date information on all fishing and related vessels that appear on the illegal, unregulated, and unreported (IUU) fishing vessel lists published by Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs) and related organisations. The aim of the site is to improve the effectiveness of the original IUU lists as a tool for a wide variety of stakeholders to better understand and combat illegal fishing and broader fisheries crime.
To date, the following regional organisations maintain or share lists of vessels that have been found to carry out or support IUU fishing within their own or adjacent convention areas and/or species of competence:
Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR)
Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT)
General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM)
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC)
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC)
Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO)
North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC)
North Pacific Fisheries Commission (NPFC)
South East Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (SEAFO)
South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO)
Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA)
Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)
The Combined IUU Fishing Vessel List merges all these sources into one list that provides a single reference point to identify whether a vessel is currently IUU listed. Vessels that have been IUU listed in the past and subsequently delisted (for example because of a change in ownership, or because the vessel is no longer in service) are also retained on the site, so that the site contains a full historic record of IUU listed fishing vessels.
Unlike the IUU lists published on individual RFMO websites, which may update vessel details infrequently or not at all, the Combined IUU Fishing Vessel List is kept up to date with the best available information regarding changes to vessel identity, flag state, ownership, location, and operations.
Milton Keynes Hospital Charity - A guide to leaving a gift in your Will
Know about the case of Herman Durand filed by Earl R. Davis
1. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK INDEX NO.:
COUNTY OF KINGS Purchased:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------X Plaintiff designates Kings
EARL R. DAVIS, AMERICAN REGIONAL REAL ESTATE County as the place of trial
PARTNERS, INC., LCD HOLDING CORP. and
WILLOUGHBY PARK INVESTORS INC.,
Plaintiffs,
-against- The basis of the venue is:
CPLR § 503 and 6 507
HERMAN DURAND and OLGA DURAND, SUMMONS
Defendants.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------X
To the above named Defendants
YOUR ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer the complaint in this action and
to serve a copy of your answer, or, if the complaint is not served with this summons, to serve a notice
of appearance, on Plaintiff s Attorney within twenty (20) days after the service of this summons,
exclusive of the day of service (or within thirty (30) days after the service is complete if this
summons is not personally delivered to you within the State of New York); and in case of your
failure to answer or appear, judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded
in the notice set forth below and in the complaint.
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
November 10, 2019
AND W M. KRISEL, ESQ.
Attorney for Plaintiff
Office and Post Office Address
44 Court Street, Suite 906
Brooklyn, New York 1 1201
(718) 222-1720
Herman Durand Olga Durand
793 Willoughby Avenue 793 Willoughby Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11206 Brooklyn, NY 1 1206
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 11/11/2019 05:20 PM INDEX NO. 524565/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/11/2019
1 of 8
2. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------x
EARL R. DAVIS, AMERICAN REGIONAL REAL ESTATE
PARTNERS INC., LCD HOLDING CORP. and W1LLOUGHBY Index No.
PARK INVESTORS INC.,
Plaintiffs,
VERIFIED COMPLAINT
-against-
HERMAN DURAND and OLGA DURAND,
Defendants.
----------------------------------------------------------------x
The Plaintiffs, EARL R. DAVIS, AMERICAN REGIONAL REAL ESTATE
PARTNERS INC., LCD HOLDING CORP. and WILLOUGHBY PARK INVESTORS INC. by
their attorney, Andrew M. Krisel, Esq., complaining of the defendants allege as follows:
1) Plaintiff, Earl R. Davis, is a resident of the County of Kings, City and State of New York.
2) Plaintiff, American Regional Real Estate Partners Inc., is a domestic Corporation with its
principal place of business located within the County of New York, City and State of New York.
3) Plaintiff, Willoughby Park Investors Inc., is a domestic Corporation with its principal
place of business located within the County of New York, City and State of New York.
4) Plaintiff, LCD Holding Corp., is a domestic Corporation with its principal place of
business located within the County of Kings, City and State of New York.
5) Upon information and belief, the defendant, Herman Durand, is a resident of the County
of Kings, City and State of New York.
6) Upon information and belief, the defendant, Olga Durand, is a resident of the County of
Kings, City and State of New York.
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 11/11/2019 05:20 PM INDEX NO. 524565/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/11/2019
2 of 8
3. 7) This action concerns real property (hereinafter "the Premises") situated in the Borough
and County of Kings, City and State of New York known as and by the Street Number 793
Willoughby Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11206, and described more fully in a document dated June
27, 2006, purporting to be a deed, a copy of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit A and
incorporated herein by reference.
8) The premises affected by this action is situated entirely within the County of Kings and is
contained in Block 1589, Lot 76 on the Land Map of the County of Kings.
9) Upon information and belief, Joseph Ferrell died intestate on December 31, 1998.
10) Upon information and belief, at the time of his death, Joseph Ferrell, was the sole owner
of the premises located at 793 Willoughby Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11206 and more fully
described above.
11) Upon information and belief, at the time of his death, Joseph Ferrell, was survived by
his son, Harvey Ferrell, his son, Steven Ferrell, his son, Jerome Ferrell, and five grandchildren,
Michael Freeman, Jeannie Freeman, Vernatina R. Freeman, Corinthians Freeman and Audrey
Freeman-Jackson all children of Joseph Ferrell's predeceased children. .
12) Upon information and belief, due to Joseph Ferrell's demise, on the date and time of his
death, by operation of law Harvey Ferrell, Steven Ferrell, and Jerome Ferrell each became a
Twenty five (25%) percent tenant in common fee absolute owner of the premises located at 793
Willoughby Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11206 and Erik Freeman, Michael Freeman, Jeannie
Freeman, Vernatina Freeman, Corinthians Freeman, and Audrey Freeman-Jackson each became a
four point one six seventh (4.16666667%) percent tenant in common fee absolute owner of the
premises located at premises located at 793 Willoughby Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11206.
13) That on or about February 23, 2011, Steven Ferrell died intestate survived by siblings
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 11/11/2019 05:20 PM INDEX NO. 524565/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/11/2019
3 of 8
4. Harvey and Jerome who each inherited eight point three (8.3333333%) percent of his tenant in
common fee absolute ownership of the premises located at premises located at 793 Willoughby
Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11206, and by his nieces and nephews, Erik, Michael, Jeannie, Vernatina,
Corinthians and Audrey who each inherited one point three nine (1.3888889%) percent of his
tenant in common fee absolute ownership of the premises located at premises located at 793
Willoughby Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11206.
14) As a result of Steven Ferrell's death, Erik Freeman, Michael Freeman, Jeannie Freeman,
Vernatina Freeman, Corinthians Freeman, and Audrey Freeman-Jackson each became five point
five (5.5555555%) percent tenant in common fee absolute owners of the premises located at 793
Willoughby Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11206.
AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
15) Plaintiffs repeat, reiterate and reallege each and every allegation contained in the
foregoing paragraphs with the same full force and effect as if hereinafter set forth at length.
16) On or about November 10, 1999, Harvey Ferrell, as preliminary Administrator of the
Estate of Joseph Ferrell, improperly and without legal authority or of any force or effect, filed a
deed attempting to transfer the premises to himself.
17) On or about November 21, 2001, Harvey Ferrell, individually, improperly and without
legal authority or of any force or effect, filed a deed attempting to transfer the entire premises
located at 793 Willoughby Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11206 to Allen Clinton.
18) Said deed to Allen Clinton was void and of no legal effect.
19) On or about February 14, 2002, the Kings County Surrogate's Court revoked the
preliminary letters issued to Harvey Ferrell and continued its restraining order against him
prohibiting him to encumber or transfer the property located at 793 Willoughby Avenue,
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 11/11/2019 05:20 PM INDEX NO. 524565/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/11/2019
4 of 8
5. Brooklyn, NY.
20) Notwithstanding that the November 2002 deed to Allen Clinton was void, on June 27,
2006, a deed was filed attempting to transfer the premises located at 793 Willoughby Avenue,
Brooklyn, NY from Allen Clinton to the defendants, Herman Durand and Olga Durand.
21) On or about June 1, 2019, a deed was signed by Corninthians Freeman, transferring all her
right, title and interests in the property known as 793 Willoughby Avenue, Brooklyn, NY, to the
plaintiffs Willoughby Park Investors Inc. and LCD Holding Corp.
22) On or about June 6, 2019, a deed was signed by Vernatina Freeman, transferring all her
right, title and interests in the property known as 793 Willoughby Avenue, Brooklyn, NY, to the
plaintiffs Willoughby Park Investors Inc. and LCD Holding Corp.
23) On or about May 24, 2019, a deed was signed by Erik Freeman, Michael Freeman and
Jeannie Freeman transferring all their right, title and interests in the property known as 793
Willoughby Avenue, Brooklyn, NY, to the plaintiffs Earl R. Davis, American Regional Real
Estate Partners Inc. and LCD Holding Corp.
24) That the plaintiffs are by right title owners and seized and possessed of an undivided share
in fee simple absolute of the premises, and entitled to exercise all rights appurtenant thereto
including but not limited to executing and recording a deed or other documents showing them to
be owners of record.
25) That the plaintiffs are entitled to a declaratory judgment specifying rights and other legal
relations between the parties and specifically that the plaintiffs are title owners and seized and
possessed of an undivided share in fee simple absolute of the premises and entitled to
exercise all rights appurtenant thereto including but not limited to executing and recording a deed
or other documents showing them to be owners of record of the Premises.
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 11/11/2019 05:20 PM INDEX NO. 524565/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/11/2019
5 of 8
6. AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
26) Plaintiffs repeat, reiterate and reallege each and every allegation contained in the
foregoing paragraphs with the same full force and effect as if hereinafter set forth at length.
27) Upon information and belief, on or about July 18, 2006, the defendants filed a document
purporting to be a deed which attempted to transfer One Hundred (100%) percent of the premises
located at 793 Willoughby Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11206 to the defendants.
28) The defendants have filed a public document claiming an estate or interest in the real
property adverse to those of the plaintiffs.
29) The legal heirs of Steven Ferrell and Jerome Ferrell are similarly situated to the plaintiffs
but not named as parties to this action.
30) Plaintiffs claim an estate and/or interest of ownership in the property located at 793
Willoughby Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11206 and bring this action pursuant to Article 15 of the
Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law to compel a determination of all claims adverse to
the plaintiffs made by the defendants.
AS AND FOR A THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
31) Plaintiffs repeat, reiterate and reallege each and every allegation contained in the
foregoing paragraphs with the same full force and effect as if hereinafter set forth at length.
32) Upon information and belief, the attempted conveyance of the property to the
defendants was made based upon void instruments and of no legal force and effect.
33) As a result of same the conveyance is fraudulent as to the defendants.
34) Based on the forgoing, the plaintiffs are entitled to a judgment wherein the documents
dated November 10. 1999, November 21, 2001 and June 27, 2006 purporting to be deeds which
attempted to transfer One Hundred (100%) percent of the premises located at 793 Willoughby
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 11/11/2019 05:20 PM INDEX NO. 524565/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/11/2019
6 of 8
7. Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11206 are judicially declared null and void.
WHEREFORE the plaintiff demands:
1. A judgment declaring the rights and other legal relations of the parties, specifically
that the plaintiffs are title owners and seized and possessed of an undivided percentage in fee
simple absolute of the premises, and entitled to exercise all rights appurtenant thereto including
but not limited to executing and recording a deed or other documents showing them to be owners
of record of the Premises:
2. A judgment pursuant to Article 15 of the Real Property Law to compel a determination
of all claims adverse to the plaintiffs made by the defendants;
3. A judgment wherein the document dated November 10, 1999, November 21, 2001
and June 27, 2006, purporting to be deeds which attempted to transfer One Hundred (100%)
percent of the premises located at 793 Willoughby Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11206 are judicially
declared null and void.
4. A judgment for such other and further relief as is just and proper.
Dated: Brooklyn, NY
November 10, 2019
ANDREW M. SEL, ESQ.
Attorney for the Plaintiffs
EARL R. DAVIS, AMERICAN
REGIONAL REAL ESTATE
PARTNERS INC., LCD HOLDING CORP.
and WILLOUGHBY PARK INVESTORS
INC
44 Court Street, Suite 906
New York, NY 11201
718 222- 1720
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 11/11/2019 05:20 PM INDEX NO. 524565/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/11/2019
7 of 8
8. VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned, an attorney duly admitted to practice law before the Courts of
the State of New York, hereby affirm under penalty of perjury:
I am the attorney for Plaintiffs in the within matter.
I have read the annexed COMPLAINT, know the contents thereof and the same
are true to my knowledge, except those matters therein which are stated to be alleged on
information and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true. The basis for my belief
as to those matters is conversations with my client and a review of documents in file. I make this
verification instead of the plaintiffs because some of the plaintiffs reside in a county other than
where I maintain my office.
Dated: Brooklyn NY
November 10, 2019
ANDREŸV M. KRIS L
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 11/11/2019 05:20 PM INDEX NO. 524565/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/11/2019
8 of 8