SlideShare a Scribd company logo
KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES
2015-2016 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, AND BILLING
March 1, 2016
Introduction
The King County Geographic Information System (KCGIS) is a coordinated regional geographic information
resource, organized to meet the business needs of King County, local agencies, and the general public.
KCGIS is comprised of both the King County GIS Center (an internal service fund, responsible for core GIS
resources and enterprise services for the entire County) and business specific activity in various GIS programs
distributed across other County departments.
KCGIS activity is coordinated by means of a management level GIS Steering Committee (GSC) and an
operational level GIS Technical Advisory Committee (GTAC).
KCGIS organization, governance, and operations are described in detail in the annual KCGIS Operations and
Maintenance Plan.
This document describes the background and details of the King County GIS Center (KCGIS Center) internal
service fund, the funding, rate setting, and billing methodology used by the fund, and the current 2015-16
budget and financial plan of the fund.
The King County Geographic Information Systems Fund
Enabling Legislation:
On December 13, 2001 the King County Council approved ordinance 2001-0555 (enactment 14270) creating the
King County Geographic Information Systems Fund. Partial text of the ordinance follows:
AN ORDINANCE creating the geographic information systems fund, classified as an internal service
fund, for the purpose of accounting for financial resources for the full costing of operating, maintaining
and enhancing automated geographic information systems that serve both county agencies and
external customers; providing for the transfer of geographic information systems assets from the
information and telecommunication – data processing fund; amending Ordinance 12076, section 10, as
amended, and K.C.C. 4.08.025, as amended, and adding a new section to K.C.C. chapter 4.08.
PREAMBLE:
Due to the reorganization of the county’s geographic information systems resources into an internal
services section within the department of natural resources and parks, it is desirable to create a new
geographic information systems internal services fund for the purpose of accounting for financial
resources for the full costing of operating, maintaining and enhancing automated geographic
information systems.
Effective January 1, 2002, accumulated undesignated fund balance of two hundred fifty thousand
dollars is hereby transferred from the information and telecommunication - data processing fund to the
geographic information systems fund. This represents the estimated share of the information and
telecommunication - data processing fund’s undesignated fund balance that has been contributed by
geographic information systems operations.
On July 11, 2011 the Council approved ordinance 2011-0154, transferring the KCGIS Fund from DNRP to the
newly formed King County Department of Information Technology (KCIT). The text of the appropriate section of
the King County Code reads:
4.08.275 Geographic information systems fund.
A. There is hereby created the geographic information systems fund, classified as a[n] internal
service fund, for the purpose of accounting for financial resources for the full costing of operating,
maintaining and enhancing automated geographic information systems that serve both county agencies
and external customers. For the purpose of this section, “full costing” means all costs associated with
operation, maintenance, rental, repair, replacement, central service cost and department overhead
allocation.
KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES: 2015/16 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, & BILLING
PAGE 2 of 10
B. The director of the department of information technology or the director's designee shall be
the fund manager and shall establish charges to recover full costing for geographic information systems
fund services and operations.
C. Annual appropriations of revenues, beginning in 2002, shall be included in the budgets of
those agencies and funds either benefiting from the centralized geographic information systems or
receiving services from staff budgeted in geographic information systems fund, or both, which revenues
shall be transferred to geographic information systems fund monthly. (Ord. 17142 § 11, 2011: Ord.
14270 § 2, 2001).
The King County geographic information systems fund operates under the name King County GIS Center
(KCGIS Center).
King County Internal Service Fund Purpose, Benefits, & Responsibilities:
King County Code gives internal service funds full financial and operational responsibility to provide designated
services. Agencies receiving services or benefiting from internal service fund activities are required to budget
for internal service fund costs. In addition, the KCGIS Center fund is chartered to operate on an entrepreneurial
basis – both within the county and externally.
The benefits of an internal service fund include:
 Develop annual budget, free from non-fund business interference
 Manage fund finances and carry savings forward from year to year within County financial guidelines
 Develop and manage cash reserves for specific long term needs
 Own equipment & assets
 Develop staff resources to meet business needs
The responsibilities of an internal service fund include:
 Develop annual budget and workplans within the context of countywide goals
 Manage budget, finances, & assets
 Pay all direct and overhead costs:
 Staff salary & benefits
 Hardware, software, furniture, equipment, supplies, & services
 Training costs
 Office space rent, phones, email, IT infrastructure
 All other overhead costs, from audit services to vehicle rental
 Develop customers and ensure revenue to fund operations
KCGIS Center Fund Accounting Structure:
Effective January 1, 2012, the KCGIS Center became part of the King County Department of Information
Technology (KCIT). At the same time the KCGIS Center transitioned along with the rest of King County to the
new Enterprise Business System (EBS) accounting and financial management system developed as part of the
County’s Accountable Business Transformation (ABT) project.
KCGIS Center General Ledger Accounting Codes:
Fund number: 000005481
Fund Name: KING COUNTY GIS FUND
Department: A01100
Division: D01100
Cost Center: 011000
KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES: 2015/16 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, & BILLING
PAGE 3 of 10
KCGIS Center EBS Financial System Project Expenditure and Revenue Accounting Codes (POETA Codes):
Project: 1001485
Org: 011000
Expense: TBD
Task: 001
Award: Not Used
For budgetary and accounting purposes, each County agency generally includes funds for KCGIS Center services
in a designated expenditure account within the appropriate budget. The KCGIS Center budgets and accounts
for revenue in corresponding revenue accounts. These expenditure and revenue accounts correspond to the
KCGIS Center’s three business lines.
The designated County accounts for KCGIS Center internal service fund services are:
Business Line Client Agency
Expense
Account
KCGIS Center
Revenue
Account
EBS Expenditure
Type
Smart
Spreadsheet
Crosswalk
BARS
GIS Enterprise
Operations
55026 44020 55026 GIS O AND
M
55026U 00090
GIS Client
Services
55051 44021 55051 GIS CLIENT
SERVICES
55051U 00091
GIS Matrix
Services
55052 44022 55052 GIS
MATRIX SERVICES
55052U 00092
Miscellaneous KCGIS Center Financial Identification:
KCGIS Center Federal Tax ID #: 91-6001327
KCGIS Center DUNS #: 13-838-9148
KCGIS Center CCR #: WPA3SC
KCGIS Center Washington UBI #: 602 225 054
KCGIS Center monthly financial reports are available online within King County via the county’s Oracle
Discoverer Financial reporting System.
KCGIS Center Funding, Rate Setting & Billing Methodology
General Principles:
The KCGIS Center segments its operations into three ‘business lines’ each focused on common GIS services and
resources. Each business area focuses on the unique value of the specific services offered. Each business line
also supports a logical cost allocation methodology to help GIS users understand the basis for individual GIS
service cost components. This allows end user agency managers to make an informed business decision on
how to use GIS as a tool for their agency’s operations.
Each of the three KCGIS Center business areas (Enterprise GIS Operations, GIS Client Services, and Matrix GIS
Staffing Services) share common management and rate setting principles:
 Each business area benefits by shared management, administration, and overhead.
 Costs for shared functions are allocated fairly to each business area.
 Costs specific to a business area are fully allocated to that business area.
 Each business area is fully funded by its own customer base.
KCGIS Center operating costs fall into three broad categories:
 Labor costs (wages & benefits)
 Overhead costs (O/H – includes County and department overhead, rent, phones, email, KCIT, finance,
etc.). Beginning in 2015, all hardware replacement costs (PC’s, laptops, servers, data storage, etc.)
became an overhead charge, paid to KCIT.
 Other direct costs (ODC’s – include imagery acquisition, supplies, services, software, training, etc.)
KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES: 2015/16 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, & BILLING
PAGE 4 of 10
KCGIS Center rates are designed to collect revenue from its customers in four broad areas:
 Revenue from internal sources sufficient to cover costs as authorized by MKCC 4.08.275
 Revenue sufficient to ensure sound financial fund management, including designated fund reserves and
fund surplus targets in accordance with financial plan policies.
 Revenue from external customers, either for client services or to cooperatively fund certain data
acquisition projects.
 Revenue to fund certain ‘mandated and business foundation’ (M&BF) services for KCIT.
To ensure that customers fully fund appropriate costs, and to ensure the fair allocation of costs for shared
services, a detailed budget/rate development spreadsheet is used to account for all planned costs and to
determine a rate that will recover sufficient revenue within each business area.
Overhead Allocation Practices:
KCGIS Center internal management and administrative support costs are allocated to the three business lines as
part of the budget development process, based on a calculation of actual costs.
KCGIS Center overhead and other direct costs (other internal services, general fund overhead, KCIT overhead,
rent, etc.) are allocated to the three 'lines of business' based on a calculation of significant budget factors,
including:
 FTEs
 Major non-FTE specific office resources (data and application server costs, training program related,
etc.)
 Dedicated servers or software
 Major GIS database resources
 Major GIS application resources
Financial Plan
Each county internal service fund updates its financial plan as part of the biannual budget process. The
financial plan depicts high-level fund balance, rates, revenue, expenditure, and reserve amounts for the
proposed budget within the context of two years before the proposed two-year budget and two years after.
The financial plan notes are used to clarify assumptions, set target levels for certain under expenditures,
establish the policy basis for designated fund reserves, a projected ending undesignated fund balance, and any
projected reserve shortfalls.
The County’s Office of Strategy, Performance and Budget (OSPB) uses the financial plan to assess the
immediate and long-term viability of the proposed budget. In some years the budget office may mandate
underexpenditure targets, an increase in rates, or both to ensure that the fund remains viable. The financial
plan is included as part of the budget submittal.
Reserve Funds:
The KCGIS Center maintains a number of designated reserve funds:
 Imagery Acquisition Fund.
o Sources of funds:
 Quarterly allocation from GIS O&M rates. Currently $416,000 per budget biennium.
 Revenue from external imagery acquisition partners
 Revenue from sale of access to County Pictometry data for local public agencies
o Use of funds:
 Imagery acquisition costs are paid from the fund reserve.
 In some cases, external agencies are refunded unused payments.
 E911 is paid for a share of Pictometry imagery costs
o Imagery fund reserve fluctuates based on best imagery acquisition commercial terms and
biennial major acquisition cycle. Reserve balance also fluctuates based on the amount of
KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES: 2015/16 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, & BILLING
PAGE 5 of 10
imagery funding revenue from GIS O&M rates and revenue paid by regional partner agencies.
The fund may include money from external agencies held for use on future projects.
o External revenue is billed via invoice by KCGIS admin staff or through KC A/R.
 Prepaid Client Services Reserve: Represents balance of prepaid client services revenue received, minus
work completed on account.
 King Street Center Training Room Rental Reserve: This reserve is funded by rental revenue from
external customers of the GIS Training Center. This reserve is held to provide a GIS training credits
fund for county agencies and a portion of the training room rental revenue is transferred to KCIT to
offset their maintenance of the training computers. To be included in Prepaid Client Services Reserve
beginning in 2017/2018.
 Revenue Variance Reserve: This reserve targets 2.5 percent of revenue budgets (except external
agency imagery revenue) to protect against future service request volatility.
 Strategic Regional Sustainable Capacity Reserve: This is a one-time reserve to fund a 2017/18 regional
GIS capacity building KCGIS Priority Initiatives that will enhance end-user agency applications and GIS
return on investment. Reserve based on 2.5 percent of revenue.
Enterprise GIS Operations (O&M):
The KCGIS Center’s core business line is built around enterprise GIS infrastructure and operation services.
Specific enterprise GIS operation services may be modified on a biennial basis in consultation with the King
County GIS Technical Advisory Committee. For KCGIS’ 2015-16 budget years these services will be provided by
11.10 FTEs and include:
 KCGIS Center management and administration
 KCGIS governance support (GIS Steering & Technical Advisory Committees, standards & best practices,
and annual KCGIS O&M Plan)
 KCGIS program coordination (agency support & marketing)
 Regional GIS contact and coordination
 Spatial Data Warehouse operation and management (SDW administration, content management &
metadata management)
 KCGIS Website management
 GIS productivity applications development & management (back-end apps, Web front-end apps, &
client end-user apps)
 Data maintenance coordination (coordinate agency data maintenance & QC, external data acquisition &
designated enterprise data maintenance)
 Regional imagery acquisition program
 GIS-related contract management, including Esri enterprise license agreement and enterprise license
management (ELM) based Esri software access
 Education & Outreach (brownbag training, help desk, custom GIS training class development, regional
KCGIS User Group)
 Coordination of designated countywide priority GIS initiatives
A key characteristic of most (but not all) core services for enterprise GIS operations is that they are ‘fixed-cost’
in nature. Total budget costs can be increased or decreased by adding or removing entire ‘service offerings,’
but costs are typically not greatly effected by the total number of individual end-users, the volume of use by
those end-users, or by the number of agencies that fund the services.
The KCGIS Center develops a preliminary budget to cover proposed enterprise GIS operation services levels for
the coming two year budget period, in consultation with the GIS Technical Advisory Committee and the GIS
Steering Committee. The KCGIS budget typically includes specific FTE and cost allocations for each service
offering, to allow a business analysis of the value of providing the service.
KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES: 2015/16 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, & BILLING
PAGE 6 of 10
The KCGIS Center’s O&M funding model is based on the following premises:
 Enterprise Operations can be defined into discrete categories of GIS services.
 The level of work effort and total cost to provide each category of GIS services can be determined
objectively via the KCGIS Center’s Time Recording System (TRS) and by KCGIS financial records.
 Distinct GIS user communities can be identified and costs for each of the categories of GIS services can
be objectively allocated to one or more of the user communities.
 The level of use or benefit for individual agencies within each GIS user community can be measured
objectively and O&M costs allocated to each agency on the basis of actual use or benefit
The KCGIS Center allocated all its proposed 2015-16 budget Enterprise GIS Operations costs into 23 discrete
categories of services, based on actual level of effort as documented in TRS (see appendix A). For 2015-16 two
distinct GIS user communities were identified (desktop GIS users and web based GIS users). This is reflective
of the findings of the 2012 King County GIS ROI Study conducted by the University of Washington Benefit-Cost
Analysis Center that the primary financial benefit from GIS is derived from business end-users utilizing GIS
based applications for county business purposes. GIS based applications are delivered via desktop GIS, web
based GIS, and mobile platforms.
The total cost for each category of GIS services is allocated proportionately to each GIS user community
benefiting from the service. The total cost allocated to each GIS user community is then allocated to individual
agencies within the community on the following basis:
 Desktop GIS Users: Agencies are allocated costs that benefit desktop GIS users on the basis of the
number of desktop GIS users within each agency. These costs are related to services that support
standards, the spatial data warehouse, front-end applications, data maintenance/coordination, imagery
acquisition, training/help desk support, and priority initiatives. This community represents KCGIS end
users that use desktop GIS and costs are based on the actual number of GIS ‘seats’ within each
department. Seats are defined as software licenses that can access the KCGIS Data Warehouse and
hence benefit from the level of effort and cost to maintain and operate the warehouse.
The O&M funding model recognizes that not all GIS enabled software is equal. The standard ‘seat’ is
based upon use by an agency of basic ArcGIS software (ArcView) with a value of 1.0 within the funding
model. Using annual software maintenance cost within the Esri ELA as a proxy for software capability,
other software seat values are based on the following factors:
 ArcView Secondary: 1.00
 ArcView Primary: 1.40
 ArcInfo Primary: 6.00
 ArcInfo Secondary: 2.40
 ArcEditor Primary: 3.00
 ArcEditor Secondary: 2.40
 Arc Extension Primary: 1.00
 Arc Extension Secondary: 0.40
 ArcPAD: 0.50
 Esri Runtime License: 0.20
 MapObjects Deployed: 0.20
 ArcMobile: 0.20
 ArcGIS for iPad, Android, etc.: 0.20
 AutoCAD 0.10
 City Engine 0.10
 Maverick Map CAD 0.10
 Maverick Map Mobile 0.01
 Accela Permitting 0.10
 xTracker 0.10
 MS MapPoint: 0.10
 Open Source Desktop S/W: 1.00
The list of desktop software ‘seats’ reflects the fact that GIS software capability that allows access to
KCGIS Data and other enterprise services is diverse. Some users of ‘runtime’ licenses embedded in
permitting or work order management software might not even realize that their application requires
KGCIS data resources. Other ‘seats’ might not even be literal seats, as in the case of ArcPAD or ArcGIS
for iPad or Android devices used by field personnel. The equivalency factors though ensure that all
users pay a fair share for access to KCGIS Center resources. For 2015-16, the funding model is based
on a total of 359.37 equivalent desktop GIS users.
 Web GIS Users: Agencies are allocated costs that benefit Web GIS users on the basis of the number of
‘user sessions’ that access KCGIS Web Mapping applications within each agency. These costs are
KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES: 2015/16 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, & BILLING
PAGE 7 of 10
related to services that support the spatial data warehouse, front-end Web applications, imagery
acquisition, training/help desk support, and priority initiatives. This community represents KCGIS end
users that use Web GIS mapping and costs are based on the actual annual recorded number of ‘user
sessions’ on the KCGIS Web mapping applications within each department (based on IP addresses
mapped to IP address ranges assigned to county business units). For the 2015-16 budget, the funding
model is based on 235,705 total ‘user sessions’ during 2013.
 Note that in previous funding models, Esri ELM based GIS software usage was included in the GIS O&M
funding model. Because these costs are related to the discretionary GIS-access platform for agency
users, they do not fit the basis for the new model. For 2015-16, these costs will be recovered via
mandatory GIS client –services charges.
The aggregate of costs from each of these GIS user communities is allocated to each agency, to determine each
agency’s total share of the GIS O&M funding model. Some agencies may have costs from just one community,
while others have costs from both.
The 2015-16 KCGIS Center Enterprise Operations Rates budget is comprised of the revenue required to cover
the allocated costs as outlined above. It also includes an additional 5.46% to cover KCIT’s Mandated and
Business Foundation (M&BF) costs, charged to each agency (see Appendix B). Note that the 5.46% M&BF costs
are not added to external agency invoices for their funding for the KCGIS Center’s regional aerial imagery
project.
The proposed budget and funding model is subject to the same review and approval process that each fund
faces for their annual budget. This process includes extensive review by the county budget office (OSPB),
followed by further review and approval of the proposed budget by the County Executive for his budget
submittal to Council. Once approved by the Council, the budget is finalized.
Once the budget period begins, the KCGIS Center obtains POETA codes and billing concurrence from each of
the agencies included in the KCGIS Enterprise Operations (O&M) funding model (budget account 55026). This
concurrence is obtained via email and complies with KC Policy FIN 15-4. Automated GIS Rate billing is
performed either monthly or quarterly as agreed with each agency. Billing is executed by the KCGIS Center
using EBS/AxWay Secure Transport System based Smart Spreadsheets to create usage-based interfund
transfers. For more details, refer to the KCGIS Center – EBS/AxWay Smart Spreadsheet Client Billing Procedure.
GIS O&M revenue is posted as received to the KCGIS internal service fund (revenue account 44020) by the
County’s EBS accounting system. The 5.46% M&BF costs added to the GIS O&M rates are posted as received
into the appropriate designated KCIT revenue account.
External Enterprise GIS Operations Revenue:
Imagery acquisition is one of the designated GIS Enterprise Operations Services (D.3.e). When imagery
acquisition projects include external funding partners and KCGIS serves as the project manager and/or fiscal
agent, external revenue is posted as received to the KCGIS revenue account 44020, and credited to the
designated imagery reserve fund.
GIS Client Services:
King County experience has been that all county agencies require customized, on-demand GIS services on
occasion. This is true of departments with their own GIS staff (perhaps during periods of peak work load, for
advanced training, or for very specialized types of service) and of departments with no integral GIS capability
(perhaps needing services as simple as making a map or helping an employee learn to use a web based
application).
KCGIS Center provides on-demand GIS client services to meet the unique or unanticipated needs of county
business units and of external customers. 5.40 FTE are assigned to client services for 2015/16. Typical services
provided by the staff assigned to this business line include:
 GIS training
 GIS programming
 Custom mapping
 GIS data development or maintenance
KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES: 2015/16 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, & BILLING
PAGE 8 of 10
 Short-term GIS staffing
 GIS consulting
 GIS needs assessment, planning, and implementation support
 Custom GIS data requests
Because of the on-demand nature of client services work, budget projections are speculative. KCGIS includes
estimated costs and revenues for GIS client services as it develops its proposed annual budget, based on
current year trends, past history, and conversations with client agencies who may request increased or
decreased client services budgeting. Budgeted costs include labor and direct client services costs (supplies,
services, hardware, software, training, etc.), plus an allocated proportion of KCGIS Center overhead,
management, and administration.
As the budget is developed, an hourly billing rate for the budget year is calculated by dividing total projected
costs (labor, overhead, management, administration, and other direct costs) by the total number of projected
billable hours. Annual average billable hours for individual client services staff are calculated by subtracting
estimated employee leave and non-billable work hours from a nominal total of 2080 payroll hours per year.
Specific types of leave and non-billable work hours include:
 Leave (holidays, vacation, sick leave, jury duty, FMLA, etc.
 Personal administration time (payroll, benefits, etc.)
 KC & Div administration time (KC activity, communications, office, equipment, etc.)
 Section administration (time records, performance monitoring, meetings, etc.)
 Training & professional development
 Client services marketing and customer relationship management
 Product & service research and development
For 2015/16, the calculated annual average net billable hours per client services FTE is 1337.
The net annual estimated billable hours per client services FTE is multiplied by the total FTEs budgeted for client
services work to determine total estimated billable hours. This total is divided into the total labor, supplies,
management, administration, and overhead budget for client services to determine the hourly billing revenue
requirement for the budget year.
The KCIT 5.46% M&BF costs are added to the hourly billing revenue requirement and then rounded, to
determine the final hourly billing rates. Tiered hourly billing rates are used to recognize labor cost differences
for five basic categories of GIS staff. For current GIS Billing rates see:
http://www.kingcounty.gov/operations/GIS/ClientServices/Prices.aspx.
Some products or services (GIS data sales, map printing, and training classes) are provided on a per unit basis.
Per unit costs are calculated from the hourly billing rate, plus the cost of any consumable products or special
equipment.
The KCGIS Center Client Services group also manages rental of the County’s King Street Center Computer
Training Facility (CTF) to non-King County users. The facility has been owned jointly by KC DOT and DNRP.
Revenue from rental to non-County users is held in a KCGIS Center designated fund reserve, for future
Computer Training Facility equipment replacement.
In addition, a budget is proposed for other direct non-labor reimbursable costs (media, software, commercial
data, contracted consulting, etc.) that would typically be billed to clients separately.
The KCGIS Center Client Services business line also includes three other reimbursements:
 Providing Esri ELA based GIS software for dedicated use by county departments.
 Providing pooled Esri GIS software for use by all county employees via an enterprise license
management utility.
 Also, the eight County Executive Departments are each charged to fund 0.15 FTE within client services
for ‘KingStat’ GIS support to OSPB.
KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES: 2015/16 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, & BILLING
PAGE 9 of 10
These Esri software and KingStat GIS costs outlined above are billed to county agencies on a monthly or
quarterly basis (see below).
During the budget development process, KCGIS typically seeks budget commitments from departments for
client services work for the coming year. For 2015 and 2016 these revenue commitments total approximately
82% and 79% respectively of the proposed client services budget. For budget purposes, an additional 6% -
9% of the proposed revenue is described as contingent from county agencies, and another 11% - 13% as
contingent from outside agencies.
Even though departments commit to earmark funds in their budget for KCGIS client services work, the decision
to spend some of the budgeted funds (or other department funds if agency workload warrants) is made on a
case-by-case basis by individual agency business unit managers. In effect, these managers make an individual
benefit/cost analysis when they decide to spend agency funds for specific on-demand GIS client services.
Agency reimbursement for Esri ELA software costs is not discretionary. It is based on prior year’s usage.
Likewise, funding for KingStat is not discretionary.
For KCGIS client services, budget review and approval does not directly involve client agencies. The KCGIS
case to the budget office, Executive, and Council for this portion of the proposed budget is based on the
funding reserve commitments, previous year’s actual client services activity, and recognition of a reasonable
contingency to accommodate peak demand or emergency workload. This component of the proposed budget is
subject to the same Budget Office, Executive, and Council review and approval process as outlined above.
Once the budget year begins, agencies are billed for GIS client services work after work is completed, or
monthly for projects that may extend over two or more months.
Agencies can also prepay for GIS client services, establishing an account with the KCGIS Center that can be
used to obtain future GIS training, services, or products at the rate in effect when the services are actually
provided.
Once the budget year begins, the KCGIS Center obtains standard POETA codes from each of the agencies with
a KCGIS client services budget (budget account 55051)
After agreed project work is completed, client billing is performed in either one lump sum, or monthly for more
lengthy projects. Billing approval and POETA coding verification is obtained via email to comply with KC Policy
FIN 15-4. . Billing is executed by the KCGIS Center using EBS/AxWay Secure Transport System based Smart
Spreadsheets to create usage-based interfund transfers. For more details, refer to the KCGIS Center –
EBS/AxWay Smart Spreadsheet Client Billing Procedure.
For Esri ELA GIS software and KingStat GIS costs, at the beginning of the year, the KCGIS Center obtains
POETA codes and billing concurrence from each of the agencies responsible form these costs. This concurrence
is obtained via email and complies with KC Policy FIN 15-4. GIS Rate billing is performed either monthly or
quarterly as agreed with each agency. Billing is executed by the KCGIS Center using EBS/AxWay Secure
Transport System based Smart Spreadsheets to create usage-based interfund transfers.
External client services customer work only commences after a signed project agreement and billing
authorization is received. Customers are billed monthly or as major milestones are completed via invoice by
KCGIS admin staff or through KC A/R. Some client services work requires prepayment:
 Training registration. In 2016 KCGIS began accepting credit card payments for training classes.
 Custom GIS data requests
 Custom map printing
GIS client services revenue is posted as received to the KCGIS internal service fund (revenue account 44021) by
the County’s EBS accounting system. The 5.46% M&BF costs added to the GIS client services rates are
transferred periodically to the designated KCIT revenue account.
Matrix GIS Staffing Services Unit:
Several King County departments have dedicated business specific GIS units or individual GIS staff. KCGIS
Center directly manages and/or staffs GIS operations for eight divisions within the County:
KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES: 2015/16 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, & BILLING
PAGE 10 of 10
2015/16 Matrix GIS Staff Customers:
 DNRP: WLRD
 DNRP: WTD
 DNRP: SWD
 DNRP: Parks
 DOT: Roads
 DOT: KCIA
 DPER
 OSPB
Staff levels are agreed on a biennial ‘negotiated level of service’ basis. The divisions benefit by reduced costs
from pooled management and enhanced efficiency resulting from higher professional standards, cross training,
redundancy, and best practices.
Each division designates a GIS matrix manager, who is responsible both for evaluating the level of business
need for direct GIS services within their division, and for coordinating the assignment of allocated staff to work
on specific projects. 11.50 FTE are budgeted for 2015/16. Typical services provided by this business line
includes:
 Data development and maintenance
 Custom application development
 Mapping
 GIS data analysis
 End-user training and support
KCGIS includes costs and revenues for Matrix GIS staffing services as it develops its proposed annual budget.
In addition to the labor and direct costs (supplies, services, hardware, software, training, etc.) described above,
funding and rates include an allocated proportion of KCGIS Center overhead, management, and administration.
Initial budget review and approval is with the division GIS matrix manager, as well as division and department
finance managers. This process ensures that there is customer support for proposed budget, based on the
business value provided by the GIS staffing services. This component of the proposed budget does not go
through review by the KCGIS Technical and Oversight committees, but is subject to the same Budget Office,
Executive, and Council review and approval process as outlined above.
The 2015-16 KCGIS Center Matrix Staff Rates budget is comprised of the revenue required to cover the
allocated costs as outlined above. It also includes an additional 5.46% to cover KCIT’s Mandated and Business
Foundation (M&BF) costs, charged to each agency (see Appendix B).
Once the budget year begins, the KCGIS Center obtains POETA codes and billing concurrence from each of the
agencies receiving GIS Matrixed staff services (agency budget account 55052). This concurrence is obtained via
email and complies with KC Policy FIN 15-4. GIS Matrix Rate billing is performed either monthly or quarterly as
agreed with each agency. Billing is executed by the KCGIS Center using EBS/AxWay Secure Transport System
based Smart Spreadsheets to create usage-based interfund transfers. For more details, refer to the KCGIS
Center – EBS/AxWay Smart Spreadsheet Client Billing Procedure.
GIS Matrix revenue is posted as received to the KCGIS internal service fund (revenue account 44022) by the
County’s EBS accounting system. The 5.46% M&BF costs added to the GIS Matrix rates are posted as received
into the appropriate designated KCIT revenue account.
Appendixes:
A. KCGIS Center 2015-16 Budget By Business Services (PDF)
B. KCGIS Center 2015-16 Rates & Revenue Budget (PDF)
C. KCGIS Center 2015-16 Financial Plan (PDF)
D. KCGIS Center 2015-16 Rates Basis Overview
How can I get more information?
Contact Greg Babinski, KCGIS Center Finance & Marketing Manager at greg.babinski@kingcounty.gov,
or at 206-477-4402
GB: finance:procedures:kcgisfunding&billing2015-16.doc March 2, 2016
KCGIS Center 2015-16KCGISProposed(20140723).xls
Total
Task Description Labor ODCs OH Total FTE's:
KCGIS Center Enterprise Operations (O&M Funded):
A. Manage & Administer the KCGIS Center 0.0000
1. Management 372,719
$ 11,107
$ 99,306
$ 483,132
$ 1.0500
2. Administration 48,727
$ 2,116
$ 18,915
$ 69,758
$ 0.2000
B. Enterprise Coordination 0.0000
1. KCGIS Governance Support: 0.0000
a. Oversight Committee 11,299
$ 317
$ 2,837
$ $14,454 0.0300
b. Technical Committee 25,606
$ 740
$ 6,620
$ $32,967 0.0700
d. O&M plan 57,065
$ 1,693
$ 15,132
$ $73,890 0.1600
2. Priority Initiatives: 548,392
$ 32,628
$ 184,425
$ $765,445 1.9500
3. Program Coordination: 0.0000
a. Agency Support 50,401
$ 1,587
$ 14,187
$ $66,174 0.1500
b Marketing 99,309
$ 5,673
$ 28,373
$ $133,356 0.3000
4. Regional Coordination: 35,768
$ 1,058
$ 9,458
$ $46,283 0.1000
C. KCGIS Enterprise Infrastructure 0.0000
1. SDW System Administration 47,110
$ 30,243
$ 14,187
$ $91,540 0.1500
2. SDW Data Content Management 567,395
$ 29,131
$ 184,425
$ $780,952 1.9500
3. SDW Metadata Management 29,874
$ 1,058
$ 9,458
$ $40,389 0.1000
D. Enterprise GIS Services 0.0000
1. KCGIS Website Administration 71,574
$ 2,645
$ 23,644
$ $97,863 0.2500
2. Application Development & Maintenance 0.0000
b. Back-end Applications 205,638
$ 9,657
$ 61,475
$ $276,771 0.6500
c. Web User Applications 162,386
$ 183,501
$ 47,289
$ $393,175 0.5000
d. Client User Applications 15,888
$ 45,331
$ 4,729
$ $65,947 0.0500
3. Data Maintenance & Coordination 0.0000
a. Agency Data Coordination 203,460
$ 7,405
$ 66,204
$ $277,069 0.7000
b. External Data Acquisition 67,745
$ 2,116
$ 18,915
$ $88,776 0.2000
c. Enterprise Data Maintenance 322,558
$ 12,694
$ 113,493
$ $448,744 1.2000
e. Imagery Program Management 35,768
$ 3,154,572
$ 9,458
$ $3,199,797 0.1000
4. Vendor Services Management -
$ -
$ -
$ $0 0.0000
a. Contracts Administration 50,808
$ 1,587
$ 14,187
$ $66,582 0.1500
b. ELA License Management 39,483
$ 1,269
$ 11,349
$ $52,101 0.1200
5. Education & Outreach 0.0000
a. Training (Brownbags) 37,382
$ 1,269
$ 11,349
$ $50,000 0.1200
b. Resource Center 230,941
$ 8,463
$ 75,662
$ $315,065 0.8000
d. GIS User Meetings 13,061
$ 529
$ 4,729
$ $18,319 0.0500
Total: 3,350,357
$ 3,548,387
$ 1,049,806
$ 7,948,550
$ 11.1000
Total KCGIS Center Enterprise Operations (O&M) Budget: 7,948,550
$
Matrix GIS Staff & Operations:
Matrix GIS Staff Labor Budgeted separately in Division Budgets: $3,122,070 11.0000
KCGIS Center Management, Supervision, & Admin Support: 158,890
$ 0.5000
Total DNRP GIS ODCs: 128,098
$ 11.5000
Matrix GIS Unit Portion of GIS Center Overhead: $929,085
Total KCGIS Center Budget for Matrixed GIS Services: $4,338,142
KCGIS Center Reimbursed Client Services:
Total Reimbursed Client Services Direct Labor: 1,297,036
$ 4.6500
ment, Supervision, & Admin Support Costs…in Chargeback billing rate) 236,250
$ 0.7500
Charge-back ODCs 59,887
$ 5.4000
Charge-back portion of GIS Center Overhead: $124,674
2011 KCGIS Center Client Services/Charge-back Budget:
Client Services Other (non-rate) reimbursable expenses: 598,538
$
Total GIS Client Services Budget: 2,316,386
$
Labor total verification:
FY2011 Nominal KCGIS Chargeback Hourly Billing Rate: $122
(Assumes 130 billable hours per month per programmer or analyst)
Total KCGIS Center Budget: 14,603,078
$
GB:gb W:excelFinanceFinance2015AdoptedBudget2015-16KCGISProposed(20140723).xls:KCGIS Center Total
3/2/2016:9:15 AM
Appendix A
Fund 5481M / Dept 011000 6.24%
King County GIS Center
Agency Common Name
Agency
ABT/Budget
Name
2015
&
2016
Proposed
O&M
Revenue
2015
&
2016
Proposed
O&M
Rates
(w/
6.24%
M&BF
Costs)
2015-2016
2015-16
Client
Services
hours
Based
2015-16
annualClient
Services
KingStat
Based
2015-16
Dedicated
GIS
S/W
Maintenance
Based
2015-2016
Usage
of
Esri
software
ELM
based
access
2015-2016
Proposed
Client
Services
Revenue
2015-2016
Proposed
Client
Services
Rates
(w/
6.24%
M&BF)
2015-2016
Proposed
Matrix
Revenue
2015-2016
Proposed
Matrix
Rates
(w/
6.24%
M&BF)
2015-2016
Proposed
Total
GIS
Revenue
2015-2016
Proposed
Total
GIS
Rates
(W/
6.24%
M&BF
Costs)
King County Council DISTRICT SUPPORT CONSTITUENT SERVICES
39,193
$ 41,639
$ 60,512
$ -
$ 1,332
$ 61,844
$ 65,703
$ 101,037
$ 107,341
$
OEFA OFFICE OF E AND F ANALYSIS
21,003
$ 22,314
$ 66
$ 68
$ 72
$ 21,071
$ 22,386
$
PSB OPERATING AND CAPITAL BDGT
8,064
$ 8,567
$ 80,528
$ -
$ 598
$ 81,126
$ 86,188
$ $210,420 223,550
$ 299,610
$ 318,305
$
KCSO BUDGET & ACCOUNTING 342,516
$ 363,889
$ 1
$ 21,755
$ 3,851
$ 25,607
$ 27,205
$ 368,123
$ 391,094
$
DES:OEM OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MGMNT
17,790
$ 18,900
$ 40,745
$ 2,967
$ 42
$ 43,754
$ 46,484
$ 61,544
$ 65,384
$
DES: Admin DES ADMINISTRATION 1,374
$ 1,459
$ -
$ 6,958
$ 6,958
$ 7,392
$ 8,332
$ 8,852
$
DES: HR HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER 9
$ 9
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 9
$ 9
$
DES: Property Services REAL PROPERTY ADMIN 116,920
$ 124,216
$ 60,502
$ -
$ 243
$ 60,745
$ 64,536
$ 177,666
$ 188,752
$
Prosecuting Attorney PAO ADMIN AND OPERTNS 8,825
$ 9,376
$ 60,511
$ 60,511
$ 64,287
$ 69,336
$ 73,662
$
Superior Court ADMINISTRATION 8,287
$ 8,804
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 8,287
$ 8,804
$
District Court COURTS ADMINISTRATION 5,345
$ 5,678
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 5,345
$ 5,678
$
DES: RALS:Animal Contol ANIMAL SVCS CONTROL 17,690
$ 18,794
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 17,690
$ 18,794
$
DES: RALS 13,876
$ 14,742
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 13,876
$ 14,742
$
Department of Elections GEOGRAPH INFO SVCS 136,502
$ 145,019
$ 20,256
$ -
$ 13,585
$ 33,841
$ 35,952
$ $0 $0 170,342
$ 180,972
$
Judicial Administration ADMINISTRATION 11,369
$ 12,079
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 11,369
$ 12,079
$
KCC: BRB BOUNDARY REVIEW -
$ -
$ 15,617
$ 15,617
$ 16,592
$ 15,617
$ 16,592
$
Assessments SUPERVISION 692,448
$ 735,657
$ 162,981
$ 97,402
$ 23,372
$ 283,755
$ 301,462
$ 976,204
$ 1,037,119
$
DAJD ADMINISTRATION INTRGVRNMNTL ACCT ADLT CX (EN_910006)
12,247
$ 13,011
$ -
$ 6,958
$ 6,958
$ 7,392
$ 19,205
$ 20,403
$
DAJD JUVENILE DETENTION INTRGVRNMNTL ACCT JUV CX (EN_910100)
2,158
$ 2,292
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 2,158
$ 2,292
$
DPD PUBLIC DEFENSE ADMINISTRATION
4,902
$ 5,208
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 4,902
$ 5,208
$
Total General Fund 1,460,517
$ 1,551,654
$ 501,654
$ 13,916
$ 122,124
$ 43,088
$ 680,784
$ 723,265
$ 210,420
$ 223,550
$ 2,351,721
$ 2,498,468
$
DES: Finance FINANCE DIRECTOR 18,458
$ 19,610
$ 8
$ -
$ -
$ 18,458
$ 19,610
$
Risk Management INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION1,288
$ 1,368
$ -
$ -
$ 1,288
$ 1,368
$
DPER PERMIT ADMINISTRATION 247,884
$ 263,352
$ 15,562
$ 6,958
$ 568
$ 23,087
$ 24,528
$ $216,756 $230,282 487,727
$ 518,162
$
DPER GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICES 247,884
$ 263,352
$ 3,966
$ -
$ 100
$ 4,066
$ 4,320
$ $0 $0 251,950
$ 267,672
$
DNRP: Directors Office GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 18,030
$ 19,155
$ -
$ 6,958
$ 6,958
$ 7,392
$ 24,988
$ 26,548
$
DNRP:HistoricPreservation HISTORIC PRESERVATION 7,951
$ 8,447
$ -
$ 1,612
$ 1,612
$ 1,712
$ 9,563
$ 10,159
$
DES:HR:Benefits:HRIS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION (4)
$ (5)
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ (4)
$ (5)
$
DES:E911 E911 IMPLEMENTATION 273,738
$ 290,819
$ 39,035
$ 19,530
$ 853
$ 59,417
$ 63,125
$ 333,155
$ 353,944
$
KCIT:Appl Design/Dev TECHNICAL SVCS ADMIN 58,192
$ 61,823
$ 195,206
$ 6,958
$ 5,249
$ 207,414
$ 220,356
$ 265,606
$ 282,179
$
DNRP:WTD
Modelling GIS Upport -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ $0 $0 -
$ -
$
DNRP:WTD TECH RESOURCE RECOVERY -
$ -
$ 37,651
$ 37,651
$ 40,000
$ $0 $0 37,651
$ 40,000
$
DNRP:WTD INDUSTRIAL WASTE -
$ -
$ 47,063
$ 47,063
$ 50,000
$ $0 $0 47,063
$ 50,000
$
DNRP:WTD COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING -
$ -
$ 4,706
$ 4,706
$ 5,000
$ $0 $0 4,706
$ 5,000
$
DNRP:WTD CENTRAL SERVICES CIP 208,549
$ 221,562
$ 114,924
$ 1,860
$ 8,364
$ 125,149
$ 132,958
$ 1,545,085
$ $1,641,498 1,878,782
$ 1,996,018
$
DOT: Directors Office TRANSP DIRECTOR 1,491
$ 1,584
$ 6,958
$ 294
$ 7,252
$ 7,704
$ 8,743
$ 9,288
$
DOT:IT (Transit) TRANSIT OH DIRECT CHARGES
565,376
$ 600,656
$ 3,717
$ 23,699
$ 27,416
$ 29,127
$ 592,792
$ 629,783
$
DES: Recorders O&M RECORDER'S O AND M FUND 75,287
$ 79,985
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 75,287
$ 79,985
$
KCIT:I-Net INET OPERATIONS -
$ -
$ 9,766
$ 9,766
$ 10,376
$ 9,766
$ 10,376
$
DNRP: Parks DIRECTORS OFFICE 148,294
$ 157,548
$ 77,113
$ 382
$ 15,409
$ 92,904
$ 98,702
$ $282,635 $300,272 523,834
$ 556,521
$
Capital (Budget to 640202, but for billing, validate Poeta) DIRECTORS OFFICE -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 94,212
$ 100,091
$ 94,212
$ 100,091
$
DES:HR:Safety&Claims WORKERS COMP PAYMENTS 8
$ 8
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 8
$ 8
$
DOT:AIRPORT GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 5,938
$ 6,308
$ 62,468
$ -
$ 356
$ 62,824
$ 66,745
$ $206,576 $219,467 275,339
$ 292,520
$
DNRP:SWD SW ADMINISTRATION 43,050
$ 45,737
$ 377
$ 228
$ 605
$ 643
$ $381,874 $405,703 425,530
$ 452,083
$
DOT:Roads BUSINESS SYSTEMS 395,096
$ 419,750
$ 84,706
$ 618
$ 41,801
$ 127,125
$ 135,058
$ $192,914 $204,951 715,135
$ 759,759
$
DNRP:WLRD CENTRAL COSTS 885,583
$ 940,844
$ 3,270
$ 81,609
$ 84,879
$ 90,175
$ $1,172,857 $1,246,044 2,143,320
$ 2,277,063
$
DOT: Fleet FLEET ADMINISTRATION -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$
Public Health
2
ADMINISTRATION $ 186,231 $ 197,852 $ 35,634 $ 6,963 $ - $ 4,931 $ 47,528 50,494
$ 233,759
$ 248,346
$
Public Health: EMS
2
EMS ADMINISTRATION
$ 58,187 $ 61,818 $ 12,442 $ - $ 12,442 13,218
$ 70,629
$ 75,036
$
DC&HS: Admin DIVISION DIRECTORS OFFIVCE
24,196
$ 25,706
$ 60,506
$ 6,963
$ 0
$ 67,469
$ 71,679
$ 91,666
$ 97,385
$
Total Non-General Fund 3,470,708
$ 3,687,280
$ 800,748
$ 41,758
$ 29,754
$ 185,082
$ 1,057,335
$ 1,123,312
$ 4,092,909
$ 4,348,307
$ 8,620,952
$ 9,158,899
$
Contingent Billing to KC
Agencies 82,350
$ 82,350
$ 87,489
$ 82,350
$ 87,489
$
Contingent Billings to
External Agencies 2,385,000
$ 2,385,000
$ 474,993
$ 474,993
$ 504,633
$ 2,859,993
$ 2,889,633
$
Total CX, Non-CX, and
Outside Agencies 7,316,225
$ 7,623,934
$ 1,859,746
$ 55,674
$ 151,878
$ 228,170
$ 2,295,462
$ 2,438,698
$ 4,303,329
$ 4,571,857
$ 13,915,016
$ 14,634,489
$
2015 & 2016 Proposed Revenue Detail with 2014 Adopted
gb: W:WordFinanceProcedures2015-2016KCGIS_FRS&B_AppAKCGISAdopted2015-2016Rates(Final20140826).xlsxls:Rates and Revenue
3/2/2016
Appendix B
2015-16 KCGIS Center Budget:
Agency Revenue Detail
Appendix C
Ref: Email from Y Wong 10/16/2014 after PSB-Council agreement regarding correction of allocation of WTD rent by FMD to KCGIS; Rev 2015/2016 from 'Proposed' to 'Adopted' 12/23/14
Category
2013/2014
Budget
2013/2014
BTD Actuals 1
2013/2014
Estimated 2
2015/2016
Adopted
2017/2018
Projected 3
2019/2020
Projected 3
Beginning Fund Balance 995,687
$ 1,657,275
$ 1,657,275
$ 2,043,970 1,399,843 726,735
Revenues
Agency O&M Rates 5,211,609 3,621,349 4,996,880 5,238,923 5,684,231 6,110,549
Agency Matrix Rates 3,765,632 2,388,280 3,699,268 4,571,972 4,960,590 5,332,634
Agency Client Services Rates 1,904,139 758,167 1,263,359 2,029,077 1,968,089 2,255,720
Federal Grants 0 117,747 140,126 - - -
External Imagery Revenue 900,000 220,569 241,572 2,385,000 1,502,725 1,615,429
External Client Services Revenue 234,438 295,589 449,244 504,633 547,526 588,591
Credit to KCIT for M&BF Costs Collected
4
(575,501) (88,667) (719,473) (772,977) (839,175)
Total Revenues 11,440,316 7,401,701 10,701,784 14,010,132 13,890,183 15,063,748
Expenditures
Wages, Benefits and Retirement (7,775,644) (5,571,092) (7,652,945) (8,113,051) (8,478,138) (8,859,654)
Capital (73,683) (3,171) (35,514) - (294,592)
Direct Services (2,562,263) (987,023) (1,509,058) (4,339,646) (3,489,930) (3,646,977)
Intergovernmental Services (1,100,522) (811,323) (1,117,571) (2,201,561) (2,300,632) (2,404,160)
Total Expenditures (11,512,112) (7,372,609) (10,315,089) (14,654,258) (14,563,292) (14,910,792)
Estimated Underexpenditures 57,561
Other Fund Transactions
Ending Fund Balance 981,450 1,686,367 2,043,970 1,399,843 726,735 879,691
Reserves
Expenditure Reserves:
GIS Equipment Reserve5
(57,738) (203,214) (203,214)
Training Room External Revenue Reserve6
(21,779) (16,229) (21,729) (21,729)
Prepaid Client Services Reserve7
(81,825) (143,028) (108,527) (108,527)
Imagery Fund Reserve
8
(76,749) (718,709) (460,926) (111,926) (111,926) (111,926)
Data Center Move Reserve
9
(23,000) (23,000) (23,000)
Cash Flow Reserve(s)
Revenue Variance Reserve
10
(310,774) (310,774) (310,774) (294,592) (293,263) (318,058)
Strategic Sustainable Capacity Reserve
11
(294,592)
Total Reserves (571,865) (1,414,954) (1,128,170) (831,366) (405,189) (429,984)
Reserve Shortfall - - - - - -
Ending Undesignated Fund Balance
12
409,585 271,414 915,800 568,477 321,545 449,707
Financial Plan Notes:
9
Utilization of Data Center Move reserve based on $3,000 in 2010 & $6,000 subsequent years. This reserve to be liquidated in 2015-16.
10
Revenue Variance Reserve: To be partially liquidated in 2015-2016 to mitigate GIS O&M rate increases and to align with County fund balance policy and guidance; target
was 2 percent of revenue budgets (less than the most recent fund deficit 3 percent in 2010) (except external agency imagery revenue) to protect against service request
volatility.
11
This fund intends to target a $0 ending undesignated fund balance, but establish a one-time 2015/16 Strategic Regional Sustainable Capacity reserve to fund a 2017/18
regional GIS capacity building KCGIS Priority Initiatives that will enhance end-user agency applications and GIS return on investment. Reserve based on 2 percent of 2015/16
revenue.
12
It is necessary to maintain the 15/16 undesignated fund balance shown to avoid a large increase in the following two bienniums, which would otherwise occur due to the
large 15/16 budget deficit.
2015/2016 KCGIS Center Adopted Financial Plan
King County GIS Center Operating Fund / 000005481
2
2013/2014 Estimated reflects actual revenues and expenditures for 2013 and through June 30, 2014 and estimated revenues and expenditures for the remainder of 2014.
1
2013/2014 Biennial-to-Date (BTD) Actuals reflects actual revenue and expenditure totals for 2013 and through June 30, 2014, based on financial system EBS Report
GL_RPRT_030. 2013/14 actual beginning fund balance based on Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR).
3
Outyear projections were based on the following assumptions: an aggregate revenue increase of 8.5 percent to 2017/18, another 7.5 percent increase in 2019/2020.
Expenditure growth in out year biennials is 4.5 percent, assuming $1 million less in 2017/18 in regional imagery costs.
4
Mandated & Business Foundation (M&BF) Costs: estimated collection for KCIT MB&F services is applied as a percentage of revenue (2013-14 = 5.45%; 2015-20 = 6.24%)
of GIS services rendered. This revenue is to be transferred to the KCIT Services Fund.
5
Equipment Reserve established to fund replacement of core GIS data servers to ensure effective on-going operation. Reserve eliminated in 2015-16 (to help mitigate GIS
O&M rate increase), now that KCIT is providing all equipment via the KCIT service order form charges.
6
King Street Center training room rental revenue is held to provide a GIS training credits fund for county agencies and a portion of the training room rental revenue is
transferred to KCIT to offset their maintenance of the training computers.
7
Prepaid Client Services: represents balance of prepaid client services revenue received, minus work completed on account.
8
Imagery fund reserve fluctuates based on best imagery acquisition commercial terms and biennial major acquisition cycle. Reserve balance also fluctuates based on the
amount of imagery funding revenue from GIS O&M rates and revenue paid by regional partner agencies ($85,837 held for City of Seattle at the end of 2014).
W:WordFinanceProcedures2015-2016KCGIS_FRS&B_AppAApp8.3F5481 KCGIS 2015-2016 Adopted Financial Plan.xlsx:2015 16 Proposed Budget
3/2/2016 Appendix C
Appendix D

More Related Content

Similar to King County GIS Funding and Billing Procedures 2015-2016

US State Government Case Study
US State Government Case StudyUS State Government Case Study
US State Government Case Study
Mark S. Mahre
 
Quarterly performance report Q3.pptx
Quarterly performance report Q3.pptxQuarterly performance report Q3.pptx
Quarterly performance report Q3.pptx
ErYogeshRaj
 
Information Technology
Information TechnologyInformation Technology
Information Technologyjawadorak
 
2011 Strategic Plan and Annual Report - Final _ Julie Bozzi Oregon
2011 Strategic Plan and Annual Report - Final _ Julie Bozzi Oregon2011 Strategic Plan and Annual Report - Final _ Julie Bozzi Oregon
2011 Strategic Plan and Annual Report - Final _ Julie Bozzi Oregon
Julie Bozzi, PfPM, PMP
 
Intelligent power transmission asset management solutions
Intelligent power transmission asset management solutionsIntelligent power transmission asset management solutions
Intelligent power transmission asset management solutions
Ravindranatha Reddy Bandi
 
Ne gp
Ne gpNe gp
Noel R Resume Final.pdf
Noel R Resume Final.pdfNoel R Resume Final.pdf
Noel R Resume Final.pdf
NoelRichey
 
Tds usc q1 2017 presentation
Tds usc q1 2017 presentationTds usc q1 2017 presentation
Tds usc q1 2017 presentation
TelephoneDataSystems
 
Orange County CA Strategic Plan
Orange County CA Strategic PlanOrange County CA Strategic Plan
Orange County CA Strategic Plan
Tracy Quintana
 
Jan 2016 Webinar Presentation
Jan 2016 Webinar PresentationJan 2016 Webinar Presentation
Jan 2016 Webinar Presentation
Performance and Planning Exchange (PPX)
 
Effective Marketing - A Key Success Factor for Enterprise GIS
Effective Marketing - A Key Success Factor for Enterprise GISEffective Marketing - A Key Success Factor for Enterprise GIS
Effective Marketing - A Key Success Factor for Enterprise GIS
Greg Babinski
 
Operational Costing and Capacity Management
Operational Costing and Capacity ManagementOperational Costing and Capacity Management
Operational Costing and Capacity Management
fmi_igf
 
Ssc 2014 2015 integrated business plan
Ssc 2014 2015 integrated business planSsc 2014 2015 integrated business plan
Ssc 2014 2015 integrated business plan
KBIZEAU
 
Stacy Wheeler Resume
Stacy Wheeler ResumeStacy Wheeler Resume
Stacy Wheeler ResumeStacy Wheeler
 
Intacct Cloud Financial Applications Provide Foundation for Expansion at Isla...
Intacct Cloud Financial Applications Provide Foundation for Expansion at Isla...Intacct Cloud Financial Applications Provide Foundation for Expansion at Isla...
Intacct Cloud Financial Applications Provide Foundation for Expansion at Isla...
Intacct Corporation
 
2 q 2017 operating results final
2 q 2017 operating results final2 q 2017 operating results final
2 q 2017 operating results final
TelephoneDataSystems
 
Strategic Operating Review July 12, 2011 with Benoit Long
Strategic Operating Review July 12, 2011 with Benoit LongStrategic Operating Review July 12, 2011 with Benoit Long
Strategic Operating Review July 12, 2011 with Benoit Long
KBIZEAU
 
Introduction IS Utilities - Indian DISCOM
Introduction IS Utilities - Indian DISCOMIntroduction IS Utilities - Indian DISCOM
Introduction IS Utilities - Indian DISCOM
Sougata Mitra
 

Similar to King County GIS Funding and Billing Procedures 2015-2016 (20)

2016 Budget Presentation2
2016 Budget Presentation22016 Budget Presentation2
2016 Budget Presentation2
 
US State Government Case Study
US State Government Case StudyUS State Government Case Study
US State Government Case Study
 
Quarterly performance report Q3.pptx
Quarterly performance report Q3.pptxQuarterly performance report Q3.pptx
Quarterly performance report Q3.pptx
 
Information Technology
Information TechnologyInformation Technology
Information Technology
 
2011 Strategic Plan and Annual Report - Final _ Julie Bozzi Oregon
2011 Strategic Plan and Annual Report - Final _ Julie Bozzi Oregon2011 Strategic Plan and Annual Report - Final _ Julie Bozzi Oregon
2011 Strategic Plan and Annual Report - Final _ Julie Bozzi Oregon
 
Intelligent power transmission asset management solutions
Intelligent power transmission asset management solutionsIntelligent power transmission asset management solutions
Intelligent power transmission asset management solutions
 
Ne gp
Ne gpNe gp
Ne gp
 
Noel R Resume Final.pdf
Noel R Resume Final.pdfNoel R Resume Final.pdf
Noel R Resume Final.pdf
 
Tds usc q1 2017 presentation
Tds usc q1 2017 presentationTds usc q1 2017 presentation
Tds usc q1 2017 presentation
 
Orange County CA Strategic Plan
Orange County CA Strategic PlanOrange County CA Strategic Plan
Orange County CA Strategic Plan
 
Jan 2016 Webinar Presentation
Jan 2016 Webinar PresentationJan 2016 Webinar Presentation
Jan 2016 Webinar Presentation
 
Effective Marketing - A Key Success Factor for Enterprise GIS
Effective Marketing - A Key Success Factor for Enterprise GISEffective Marketing - A Key Success Factor for Enterprise GIS
Effective Marketing - A Key Success Factor for Enterprise GIS
 
Operational Costing and Capacity Management
Operational Costing and Capacity ManagementOperational Costing and Capacity Management
Operational Costing and Capacity Management
 
Ssc 2014 2015 integrated business plan
Ssc 2014 2015 integrated business planSsc 2014 2015 integrated business plan
Ssc 2014 2015 integrated business plan
 
Stacy Wheeler Resume
Stacy Wheeler ResumeStacy Wheeler Resume
Stacy Wheeler Resume
 
ITIL 2011 Foundation Overview
ITIL 2011 Foundation OverviewITIL 2011 Foundation Overview
ITIL 2011 Foundation Overview
 
Intacct Cloud Financial Applications Provide Foundation for Expansion at Isla...
Intacct Cloud Financial Applications Provide Foundation for Expansion at Isla...Intacct Cloud Financial Applications Provide Foundation for Expansion at Isla...
Intacct Cloud Financial Applications Provide Foundation for Expansion at Isla...
 
2 q 2017 operating results final
2 q 2017 operating results final2 q 2017 operating results final
2 q 2017 operating results final
 
Strategic Operating Review July 12, 2011 with Benoit Long
Strategic Operating Review July 12, 2011 with Benoit LongStrategic Operating Review July 12, 2011 with Benoit Long
Strategic Operating Review July 12, 2011 with Benoit Long
 
Introduction IS Utilities - Indian DISCOM
Introduction IS Utilities - Indian DISCOMIntroduction IS Utilities - Indian DISCOM
Introduction IS Utilities - Indian DISCOM
 

More from Greg Babinski

GMA GIS Return on Investment (ROI) Template
GMA GIS Return on Investment (ROI) TemplateGMA GIS Return on Investment (ROI) Template
GMA GIS Return on Investment (ROI) Template
Greg Babinski
 
GMI-GMCM Assessment Scale.pdf
GMI-GMCM Assessment Scale.pdfGMI-GMCM Assessment Scale.pdf
GMI-GMCM Assessment Scale.pdf
Greg Babinski
 
IMPROVING ENTERPRISE GIS OPERATIONS VIA STAFF USAGE ANALYSIS AND SURVEYS
IMPROVING ENTERPRISE GIS OPERATIONS VIA STAFF USAGE ANALYSIS AND SURVEYSIMPROVING ENTERPRISE GIS OPERATIONS VIA STAFF USAGE ANALYSIS AND SURVEYS
IMPROVING ENTERPRISE GIS OPERATIONS VIA STAFF USAGE ANALYSIS AND SURVEYS
Greg Babinski
 
BURISA News Issue 192
BURISA News Issue 192BURISA News Issue 192
BURISA News Issue 192
Greg Babinski
 
URISA Newsletter Issue 193
URISA Newsletter Issue 193URISA Newsletter Issue 193
URISA Newsletter Issue 193
Greg Babinski
 
BURISA Newsletter Issue 194 (Final Issue)
BURISA Newsletter Issue 194 (Final Issue)BURISA Newsletter Issue 194 (Final Issue)
BURISA Newsletter Issue 194 (Final Issue)
Greg Babinski
 
GIS for Equity & Social Justice Best Practices
GIS for Equity & Social Justice Best PracticesGIS for Equity & Social Justice Best Practices
GIS for Equity & Social Justice Best Practices
Greg Babinski
 
GIS v. IT - One of these things is not like the other
GIS v. IT - One of these things is not like the otherGIS v. IT - One of these things is not like the other
GIS v. IT - One of these things is not like the other
Greg Babinski
 
Babinski geography as human ecology wsu19720614
Babinski geography as human ecology wsu19720614Babinski geography as human ecology wsu19720614
Babinski geography as human ecology wsu19720614
Greg Babinski
 
Examining the meaning of confederate civil war monuments
Examining the meaning of confederate civil war monumentsExamining the meaning of confederate civil war monuments
Examining the meaning of confederate civil war monuments
Greg Babinski
 
Martin Luther King, William Bunge, URISA, and GIS for Equity and Social Justi...
Martin Luther King, William Bunge, URISA, and GIS for Equity and Social Justi...Martin Luther King, William Bunge, URISA, and GIS for Equity and Social Justi...
Martin Luther King, William Bunge, URISA, and GIS for Equity and Social Justi...
Greg Babinski
 
The future of urisa as an international organization
The future of urisa as an international organizationThe future of urisa as an international organization
The future of urisa as an international organization
Greg Babinski
 
URISA’s GIS Management Institute
URISA’s GIS Management InstituteURISA’s GIS Management Institute
URISA’s GIS Management Institute
Greg Babinski
 
2002 KCGIS O&M Issue Status Report #4: Status of Original GIS Capital Project...
2002 KCGIS O&M Issue Status Report #4: Status of Original GIS Capital Project...2002 KCGIS O&M Issue Status Report #4: Status of Original GIS Capital Project...
2002 KCGIS O&M Issue Status Report #4: Status of Original GIS Capital Project...
Greg Babinski
 
A Day in the Life of King County GIS
A Day in the Life of King County GISA Day in the Life of King County GIS
A Day in the Life of King County GIS
Greg Babinski
 
URISA Geospatial Management Competency Model - Strawman Draft
URISA Geospatial Management Competency Model - Strawman DraftURISA Geospatial Management Competency Model - Strawman Draft
URISA Geospatial Management Competency Model - Strawman Draft
Greg Babinski
 
Draft Municipal GIS Capability Maturity Model
Draft Municipal GIS Capability Maturity ModelDraft Municipal GIS Capability Maturity Model
Draft Municipal GIS Capability Maturity Model
Greg Babinski
 
Flight of the Malfunction: My 2013 Trip to Morotai & WWII 13th AAF Sites
Flight of the Malfunction: My 2013 Trip to Morotai & WWII 13th AAF SitesFlight of the Malfunction: My 2013 Trip to Morotai & WWII 13th AAF Sites
Flight of the Malfunction: My 2013 Trip to Morotai & WWII 13th AAF Sites
Greg Babinski
 
A Survey and Analysis of GIS Web Mapping Applications in Washington State
A Survey and Analysis of GIS Web Mapping Applications in Washington StateA Survey and Analysis of GIS Web Mapping Applications in Washington State
A Survey and Analysis of GIS Web Mapping Applications in Washington State
Greg Babinski
 
No GIS is an Island How (and why) we should compare ourselves and share our s...
No GIS is an Island How (and why) we should compare ourselves and share our s...No GIS is an Island How (and why) we should compare ourselves and share our s...
No GIS is an Island How (and why) we should compare ourselves and share our s...
Greg Babinski
 

More from Greg Babinski (20)

GMA GIS Return on Investment (ROI) Template
GMA GIS Return on Investment (ROI) TemplateGMA GIS Return on Investment (ROI) Template
GMA GIS Return on Investment (ROI) Template
 
GMI-GMCM Assessment Scale.pdf
GMI-GMCM Assessment Scale.pdfGMI-GMCM Assessment Scale.pdf
GMI-GMCM Assessment Scale.pdf
 
IMPROVING ENTERPRISE GIS OPERATIONS VIA STAFF USAGE ANALYSIS AND SURVEYS
IMPROVING ENTERPRISE GIS OPERATIONS VIA STAFF USAGE ANALYSIS AND SURVEYSIMPROVING ENTERPRISE GIS OPERATIONS VIA STAFF USAGE ANALYSIS AND SURVEYS
IMPROVING ENTERPRISE GIS OPERATIONS VIA STAFF USAGE ANALYSIS AND SURVEYS
 
BURISA News Issue 192
BURISA News Issue 192BURISA News Issue 192
BURISA News Issue 192
 
URISA Newsletter Issue 193
URISA Newsletter Issue 193URISA Newsletter Issue 193
URISA Newsletter Issue 193
 
BURISA Newsletter Issue 194 (Final Issue)
BURISA Newsletter Issue 194 (Final Issue)BURISA Newsletter Issue 194 (Final Issue)
BURISA Newsletter Issue 194 (Final Issue)
 
GIS for Equity & Social Justice Best Practices
GIS for Equity & Social Justice Best PracticesGIS for Equity & Social Justice Best Practices
GIS for Equity & Social Justice Best Practices
 
GIS v. IT - One of these things is not like the other
GIS v. IT - One of these things is not like the otherGIS v. IT - One of these things is not like the other
GIS v. IT - One of these things is not like the other
 
Babinski geography as human ecology wsu19720614
Babinski geography as human ecology wsu19720614Babinski geography as human ecology wsu19720614
Babinski geography as human ecology wsu19720614
 
Examining the meaning of confederate civil war monuments
Examining the meaning of confederate civil war monumentsExamining the meaning of confederate civil war monuments
Examining the meaning of confederate civil war monuments
 
Martin Luther King, William Bunge, URISA, and GIS for Equity and Social Justi...
Martin Luther King, William Bunge, URISA, and GIS for Equity and Social Justi...Martin Luther King, William Bunge, URISA, and GIS for Equity and Social Justi...
Martin Luther King, William Bunge, URISA, and GIS for Equity and Social Justi...
 
The future of urisa as an international organization
The future of urisa as an international organizationThe future of urisa as an international organization
The future of urisa as an international organization
 
URISA’s GIS Management Institute
URISA’s GIS Management InstituteURISA’s GIS Management Institute
URISA’s GIS Management Institute
 
2002 KCGIS O&M Issue Status Report #4: Status of Original GIS Capital Project...
2002 KCGIS O&M Issue Status Report #4: Status of Original GIS Capital Project...2002 KCGIS O&M Issue Status Report #4: Status of Original GIS Capital Project...
2002 KCGIS O&M Issue Status Report #4: Status of Original GIS Capital Project...
 
A Day in the Life of King County GIS
A Day in the Life of King County GISA Day in the Life of King County GIS
A Day in the Life of King County GIS
 
URISA Geospatial Management Competency Model - Strawman Draft
URISA Geospatial Management Competency Model - Strawman DraftURISA Geospatial Management Competency Model - Strawman Draft
URISA Geospatial Management Competency Model - Strawman Draft
 
Draft Municipal GIS Capability Maturity Model
Draft Municipal GIS Capability Maturity ModelDraft Municipal GIS Capability Maturity Model
Draft Municipal GIS Capability Maturity Model
 
Flight of the Malfunction: My 2013 Trip to Morotai & WWII 13th AAF Sites
Flight of the Malfunction: My 2013 Trip to Morotai & WWII 13th AAF SitesFlight of the Malfunction: My 2013 Trip to Morotai & WWII 13th AAF Sites
Flight of the Malfunction: My 2013 Trip to Morotai & WWII 13th AAF Sites
 
A Survey and Analysis of GIS Web Mapping Applications in Washington State
A Survey and Analysis of GIS Web Mapping Applications in Washington StateA Survey and Analysis of GIS Web Mapping Applications in Washington State
A Survey and Analysis of GIS Web Mapping Applications in Washington State
 
No GIS is an Island How (and why) we should compare ourselves and share our s...
No GIS is an Island How (and why) we should compare ourselves and share our s...No GIS is an Island How (and why) we should compare ourselves and share our s...
No GIS is an Island How (and why) we should compare ourselves and share our s...
 

Recently uploaded

一比一原版(WSU毕业证)西悉尼大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(WSU毕业证)西悉尼大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(WSU毕业证)西悉尼大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(WSU毕业证)西悉尼大学毕业证成绩单
evkovas
 
一比一原版(UOW毕业证)伍伦贡大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UOW毕业证)伍伦贡大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(UOW毕业证)伍伦贡大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UOW毕业证)伍伦贡大学毕业证成绩单
ehbuaw
 
PPT Item # 8 - Tuxedo Columbine 3way Stop
PPT Item # 8 - Tuxedo Columbine 3way StopPPT Item # 8 - Tuxedo Columbine 3way Stop
PPT Item # 8 - Tuxedo Columbine 3way Stop
ahcitycouncil
 
PPT Item # 6 - 7001 Broadway ARB Case # 933F
PPT Item # 6 - 7001 Broadway ARB Case # 933FPPT Item # 6 - 7001 Broadway ARB Case # 933F
PPT Item # 6 - 7001 Broadway ARB Case # 933F
ahcitycouncil
 
Effects of Extreme Temperatures From Climate Change on the Medicare Populatio...
Effects of Extreme Temperatures From Climate Change on the Medicare Populatio...Effects of Extreme Temperatures From Climate Change on the Medicare Populatio...
Effects of Extreme Temperatures From Climate Change on the Medicare Populatio...
Congressional Budget Office
 
一比一原版(UQ毕业证)昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UQ毕业证)昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(UQ毕业证)昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UQ毕业证)昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单
ehbuaw
 
一比一原版(QUT毕业证)昆士兰科技大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(QUT毕业证)昆士兰科技大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(QUT毕业证)昆士兰科技大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(QUT毕业证)昆士兰科技大学毕业证成绩单
ukyewh
 
What is the point of small housing associations.pptx
What is the point of small housing associations.pptxWhat is the point of small housing associations.pptx
What is the point of small housing associations.pptx
Paul Smith
 
一比一原版(ANU毕业证)澳大利亚国立大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(ANU毕业证)澳大利亚国立大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(ANU毕业证)澳大利亚国立大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(ANU毕业证)澳大利亚国立大学毕业证成绩单
ehbuaw
 
MHM Roundtable Slide Deck WHA Side-event May 28 2024.pptx
MHM Roundtable Slide Deck WHA Side-event May 28 2024.pptxMHM Roundtable Slide Deck WHA Side-event May 28 2024.pptx
MHM Roundtable Slide Deck WHA Side-event May 28 2024.pptx
ILC- UK
 
PPT Item # 5 - 5330 Broadway ARB Case # 930F
PPT Item # 5 - 5330 Broadway ARB Case # 930FPPT Item # 5 - 5330 Broadway ARB Case # 930F
PPT Item # 5 - 5330 Broadway ARB Case # 930F
ahcitycouncil
 
PD-1602-as-amended-by-RA-9287-Anti-Illegal-Gambling-Law.pptx
PD-1602-as-amended-by-RA-9287-Anti-Illegal-Gambling-Law.pptxPD-1602-as-amended-by-RA-9287-Anti-Illegal-Gambling-Law.pptx
PD-1602-as-amended-by-RA-9287-Anti-Illegal-Gambling-Law.pptx
RIDPRO11
 
一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单
ehbuaw
 
PNRR MADRID GREENTECH FOR BROWN NETWORKS NETWORKS MUR_MUSA_TEBALDI.pdf
PNRR MADRID GREENTECH FOR BROWN NETWORKS NETWORKS MUR_MUSA_TEBALDI.pdfPNRR MADRID GREENTECH FOR BROWN NETWORKS NETWORKS MUR_MUSA_TEBALDI.pdf
PNRR MADRID GREENTECH FOR BROWN NETWORKS NETWORKS MUR_MUSA_TEBALDI.pdf
ClaudioTebaldi2
 
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdf
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdfZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdf
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdf
Saeed Al Dhaheri
 
Uniform Guidance 3.0 - The New 2 CFR 200
Uniform Guidance 3.0 - The New 2 CFR 200Uniform Guidance 3.0 - The New 2 CFR 200
Uniform Guidance 3.0 - The New 2 CFR 200
GrantManagementInsti
 
Opinions on EVs: Metro Atlanta Speaks 2023
Opinions on EVs: Metro Atlanta Speaks 2023Opinions on EVs: Metro Atlanta Speaks 2023
Opinions on EVs: Metro Atlanta Speaks 2023
ARCResearch
 
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale war
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale warRussian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale war
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale war
Antti Rautiainen
 
PPT Item # 9 - 2024 Street Maintenance Program(SMP) Amendment
PPT Item # 9 - 2024 Street Maintenance Program(SMP) AmendmentPPT Item # 9 - 2024 Street Maintenance Program(SMP) Amendment
PPT Item # 9 - 2024 Street Maintenance Program(SMP) Amendment
ahcitycouncil
 
Understanding the Challenges of Street Children
Understanding the Challenges of Street ChildrenUnderstanding the Challenges of Street Children
Understanding the Challenges of Street Children
SERUDS INDIA
 

Recently uploaded (20)

一比一原版(WSU毕业证)西悉尼大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(WSU毕业证)西悉尼大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(WSU毕业证)西悉尼大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(WSU毕业证)西悉尼大学毕业证成绩单
 
一比一原版(UOW毕业证)伍伦贡大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UOW毕业证)伍伦贡大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(UOW毕业证)伍伦贡大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UOW毕业证)伍伦贡大学毕业证成绩单
 
PPT Item # 8 - Tuxedo Columbine 3way Stop
PPT Item # 8 - Tuxedo Columbine 3way StopPPT Item # 8 - Tuxedo Columbine 3way Stop
PPT Item # 8 - Tuxedo Columbine 3way Stop
 
PPT Item # 6 - 7001 Broadway ARB Case # 933F
PPT Item # 6 - 7001 Broadway ARB Case # 933FPPT Item # 6 - 7001 Broadway ARB Case # 933F
PPT Item # 6 - 7001 Broadway ARB Case # 933F
 
Effects of Extreme Temperatures From Climate Change on the Medicare Populatio...
Effects of Extreme Temperatures From Climate Change on the Medicare Populatio...Effects of Extreme Temperatures From Climate Change on the Medicare Populatio...
Effects of Extreme Temperatures From Climate Change on the Medicare Populatio...
 
一比一原版(UQ毕业证)昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UQ毕业证)昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(UQ毕业证)昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UQ毕业证)昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单
 
一比一原版(QUT毕业证)昆士兰科技大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(QUT毕业证)昆士兰科技大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(QUT毕业证)昆士兰科技大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(QUT毕业证)昆士兰科技大学毕业证成绩单
 
What is the point of small housing associations.pptx
What is the point of small housing associations.pptxWhat is the point of small housing associations.pptx
What is the point of small housing associations.pptx
 
一比一原版(ANU毕业证)澳大利亚国立大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(ANU毕业证)澳大利亚国立大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(ANU毕业证)澳大利亚国立大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(ANU毕业证)澳大利亚国立大学毕业证成绩单
 
MHM Roundtable Slide Deck WHA Side-event May 28 2024.pptx
MHM Roundtable Slide Deck WHA Side-event May 28 2024.pptxMHM Roundtable Slide Deck WHA Side-event May 28 2024.pptx
MHM Roundtable Slide Deck WHA Side-event May 28 2024.pptx
 
PPT Item # 5 - 5330 Broadway ARB Case # 930F
PPT Item # 5 - 5330 Broadway ARB Case # 930FPPT Item # 5 - 5330 Broadway ARB Case # 930F
PPT Item # 5 - 5330 Broadway ARB Case # 930F
 
PD-1602-as-amended-by-RA-9287-Anti-Illegal-Gambling-Law.pptx
PD-1602-as-amended-by-RA-9287-Anti-Illegal-Gambling-Law.pptxPD-1602-as-amended-by-RA-9287-Anti-Illegal-Gambling-Law.pptx
PD-1602-as-amended-by-RA-9287-Anti-Illegal-Gambling-Law.pptx
 
一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Adelaide毕业证)阿德莱德大学毕业证成绩单
 
PNRR MADRID GREENTECH FOR BROWN NETWORKS NETWORKS MUR_MUSA_TEBALDI.pdf
PNRR MADRID GREENTECH FOR BROWN NETWORKS NETWORKS MUR_MUSA_TEBALDI.pdfPNRR MADRID GREENTECH FOR BROWN NETWORKS NETWORKS MUR_MUSA_TEBALDI.pdf
PNRR MADRID GREENTECH FOR BROWN NETWORKS NETWORKS MUR_MUSA_TEBALDI.pdf
 
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdf
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdfZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdf
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdf
 
Uniform Guidance 3.0 - The New 2 CFR 200
Uniform Guidance 3.0 - The New 2 CFR 200Uniform Guidance 3.0 - The New 2 CFR 200
Uniform Guidance 3.0 - The New 2 CFR 200
 
Opinions on EVs: Metro Atlanta Speaks 2023
Opinions on EVs: Metro Atlanta Speaks 2023Opinions on EVs: Metro Atlanta Speaks 2023
Opinions on EVs: Metro Atlanta Speaks 2023
 
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale war
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale warRussian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale war
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale war
 
PPT Item # 9 - 2024 Street Maintenance Program(SMP) Amendment
PPT Item # 9 - 2024 Street Maintenance Program(SMP) AmendmentPPT Item # 9 - 2024 Street Maintenance Program(SMP) Amendment
PPT Item # 9 - 2024 Street Maintenance Program(SMP) Amendment
 
Understanding the Challenges of Street Children
Understanding the Challenges of Street ChildrenUnderstanding the Challenges of Street Children
Understanding the Challenges of Street Children
 

King County GIS Funding and Billing Procedures 2015-2016

  • 1. KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES 2015-2016 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, AND BILLING March 1, 2016 Introduction The King County Geographic Information System (KCGIS) is a coordinated regional geographic information resource, organized to meet the business needs of King County, local agencies, and the general public. KCGIS is comprised of both the King County GIS Center (an internal service fund, responsible for core GIS resources and enterprise services for the entire County) and business specific activity in various GIS programs distributed across other County departments. KCGIS activity is coordinated by means of a management level GIS Steering Committee (GSC) and an operational level GIS Technical Advisory Committee (GTAC). KCGIS organization, governance, and operations are described in detail in the annual KCGIS Operations and Maintenance Plan. This document describes the background and details of the King County GIS Center (KCGIS Center) internal service fund, the funding, rate setting, and billing methodology used by the fund, and the current 2015-16 budget and financial plan of the fund. The King County Geographic Information Systems Fund Enabling Legislation: On December 13, 2001 the King County Council approved ordinance 2001-0555 (enactment 14270) creating the King County Geographic Information Systems Fund. Partial text of the ordinance follows: AN ORDINANCE creating the geographic information systems fund, classified as an internal service fund, for the purpose of accounting for financial resources for the full costing of operating, maintaining and enhancing automated geographic information systems that serve both county agencies and external customers; providing for the transfer of geographic information systems assets from the information and telecommunication – data processing fund; amending Ordinance 12076, section 10, as amended, and K.C.C. 4.08.025, as amended, and adding a new section to K.C.C. chapter 4.08. PREAMBLE: Due to the reorganization of the county’s geographic information systems resources into an internal services section within the department of natural resources and parks, it is desirable to create a new geographic information systems internal services fund for the purpose of accounting for financial resources for the full costing of operating, maintaining and enhancing automated geographic information systems. Effective January 1, 2002, accumulated undesignated fund balance of two hundred fifty thousand dollars is hereby transferred from the information and telecommunication - data processing fund to the geographic information systems fund. This represents the estimated share of the information and telecommunication - data processing fund’s undesignated fund balance that has been contributed by geographic information systems operations. On July 11, 2011 the Council approved ordinance 2011-0154, transferring the KCGIS Fund from DNRP to the newly formed King County Department of Information Technology (KCIT). The text of the appropriate section of the King County Code reads: 4.08.275 Geographic information systems fund. A. There is hereby created the geographic information systems fund, classified as a[n] internal service fund, for the purpose of accounting for financial resources for the full costing of operating, maintaining and enhancing automated geographic information systems that serve both county agencies and external customers. For the purpose of this section, “full costing” means all costs associated with operation, maintenance, rental, repair, replacement, central service cost and department overhead allocation.
  • 2. KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES: 2015/16 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, & BILLING PAGE 2 of 10 B. The director of the department of information technology or the director's designee shall be the fund manager and shall establish charges to recover full costing for geographic information systems fund services and operations. C. Annual appropriations of revenues, beginning in 2002, shall be included in the budgets of those agencies and funds either benefiting from the centralized geographic information systems or receiving services from staff budgeted in geographic information systems fund, or both, which revenues shall be transferred to geographic information systems fund monthly. (Ord. 17142 § 11, 2011: Ord. 14270 § 2, 2001). The King County geographic information systems fund operates under the name King County GIS Center (KCGIS Center). King County Internal Service Fund Purpose, Benefits, & Responsibilities: King County Code gives internal service funds full financial and operational responsibility to provide designated services. Agencies receiving services or benefiting from internal service fund activities are required to budget for internal service fund costs. In addition, the KCGIS Center fund is chartered to operate on an entrepreneurial basis – both within the county and externally. The benefits of an internal service fund include:  Develop annual budget, free from non-fund business interference  Manage fund finances and carry savings forward from year to year within County financial guidelines  Develop and manage cash reserves for specific long term needs  Own equipment & assets  Develop staff resources to meet business needs The responsibilities of an internal service fund include:  Develop annual budget and workplans within the context of countywide goals  Manage budget, finances, & assets  Pay all direct and overhead costs:  Staff salary & benefits  Hardware, software, furniture, equipment, supplies, & services  Training costs  Office space rent, phones, email, IT infrastructure  All other overhead costs, from audit services to vehicle rental  Develop customers and ensure revenue to fund operations KCGIS Center Fund Accounting Structure: Effective January 1, 2012, the KCGIS Center became part of the King County Department of Information Technology (KCIT). At the same time the KCGIS Center transitioned along with the rest of King County to the new Enterprise Business System (EBS) accounting and financial management system developed as part of the County’s Accountable Business Transformation (ABT) project. KCGIS Center General Ledger Accounting Codes: Fund number: 000005481 Fund Name: KING COUNTY GIS FUND Department: A01100 Division: D01100 Cost Center: 011000
  • 3. KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES: 2015/16 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, & BILLING PAGE 3 of 10 KCGIS Center EBS Financial System Project Expenditure and Revenue Accounting Codes (POETA Codes): Project: 1001485 Org: 011000 Expense: TBD Task: 001 Award: Not Used For budgetary and accounting purposes, each County agency generally includes funds for KCGIS Center services in a designated expenditure account within the appropriate budget. The KCGIS Center budgets and accounts for revenue in corresponding revenue accounts. These expenditure and revenue accounts correspond to the KCGIS Center’s three business lines. The designated County accounts for KCGIS Center internal service fund services are: Business Line Client Agency Expense Account KCGIS Center Revenue Account EBS Expenditure Type Smart Spreadsheet Crosswalk BARS GIS Enterprise Operations 55026 44020 55026 GIS O AND M 55026U 00090 GIS Client Services 55051 44021 55051 GIS CLIENT SERVICES 55051U 00091 GIS Matrix Services 55052 44022 55052 GIS MATRIX SERVICES 55052U 00092 Miscellaneous KCGIS Center Financial Identification: KCGIS Center Federal Tax ID #: 91-6001327 KCGIS Center DUNS #: 13-838-9148 KCGIS Center CCR #: WPA3SC KCGIS Center Washington UBI #: 602 225 054 KCGIS Center monthly financial reports are available online within King County via the county’s Oracle Discoverer Financial reporting System. KCGIS Center Funding, Rate Setting & Billing Methodology General Principles: The KCGIS Center segments its operations into three ‘business lines’ each focused on common GIS services and resources. Each business area focuses on the unique value of the specific services offered. Each business line also supports a logical cost allocation methodology to help GIS users understand the basis for individual GIS service cost components. This allows end user agency managers to make an informed business decision on how to use GIS as a tool for their agency’s operations. Each of the three KCGIS Center business areas (Enterprise GIS Operations, GIS Client Services, and Matrix GIS Staffing Services) share common management and rate setting principles:  Each business area benefits by shared management, administration, and overhead.  Costs for shared functions are allocated fairly to each business area.  Costs specific to a business area are fully allocated to that business area.  Each business area is fully funded by its own customer base. KCGIS Center operating costs fall into three broad categories:  Labor costs (wages & benefits)  Overhead costs (O/H – includes County and department overhead, rent, phones, email, KCIT, finance, etc.). Beginning in 2015, all hardware replacement costs (PC’s, laptops, servers, data storage, etc.) became an overhead charge, paid to KCIT.  Other direct costs (ODC’s – include imagery acquisition, supplies, services, software, training, etc.)
  • 4. KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES: 2015/16 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, & BILLING PAGE 4 of 10 KCGIS Center rates are designed to collect revenue from its customers in four broad areas:  Revenue from internal sources sufficient to cover costs as authorized by MKCC 4.08.275  Revenue sufficient to ensure sound financial fund management, including designated fund reserves and fund surplus targets in accordance with financial plan policies.  Revenue from external customers, either for client services or to cooperatively fund certain data acquisition projects.  Revenue to fund certain ‘mandated and business foundation’ (M&BF) services for KCIT. To ensure that customers fully fund appropriate costs, and to ensure the fair allocation of costs for shared services, a detailed budget/rate development spreadsheet is used to account for all planned costs and to determine a rate that will recover sufficient revenue within each business area. Overhead Allocation Practices: KCGIS Center internal management and administrative support costs are allocated to the three business lines as part of the budget development process, based on a calculation of actual costs. KCGIS Center overhead and other direct costs (other internal services, general fund overhead, KCIT overhead, rent, etc.) are allocated to the three 'lines of business' based on a calculation of significant budget factors, including:  FTEs  Major non-FTE specific office resources (data and application server costs, training program related, etc.)  Dedicated servers or software  Major GIS database resources  Major GIS application resources Financial Plan Each county internal service fund updates its financial plan as part of the biannual budget process. The financial plan depicts high-level fund balance, rates, revenue, expenditure, and reserve amounts for the proposed budget within the context of two years before the proposed two-year budget and two years after. The financial plan notes are used to clarify assumptions, set target levels for certain under expenditures, establish the policy basis for designated fund reserves, a projected ending undesignated fund balance, and any projected reserve shortfalls. The County’s Office of Strategy, Performance and Budget (OSPB) uses the financial plan to assess the immediate and long-term viability of the proposed budget. In some years the budget office may mandate underexpenditure targets, an increase in rates, or both to ensure that the fund remains viable. The financial plan is included as part of the budget submittal. Reserve Funds: The KCGIS Center maintains a number of designated reserve funds:  Imagery Acquisition Fund. o Sources of funds:  Quarterly allocation from GIS O&M rates. Currently $416,000 per budget biennium.  Revenue from external imagery acquisition partners  Revenue from sale of access to County Pictometry data for local public agencies o Use of funds:  Imagery acquisition costs are paid from the fund reserve.  In some cases, external agencies are refunded unused payments.  E911 is paid for a share of Pictometry imagery costs o Imagery fund reserve fluctuates based on best imagery acquisition commercial terms and biennial major acquisition cycle. Reserve balance also fluctuates based on the amount of
  • 5. KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES: 2015/16 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, & BILLING PAGE 5 of 10 imagery funding revenue from GIS O&M rates and revenue paid by regional partner agencies. The fund may include money from external agencies held for use on future projects. o External revenue is billed via invoice by KCGIS admin staff or through KC A/R.  Prepaid Client Services Reserve: Represents balance of prepaid client services revenue received, minus work completed on account.  King Street Center Training Room Rental Reserve: This reserve is funded by rental revenue from external customers of the GIS Training Center. This reserve is held to provide a GIS training credits fund for county agencies and a portion of the training room rental revenue is transferred to KCIT to offset their maintenance of the training computers. To be included in Prepaid Client Services Reserve beginning in 2017/2018.  Revenue Variance Reserve: This reserve targets 2.5 percent of revenue budgets (except external agency imagery revenue) to protect against future service request volatility.  Strategic Regional Sustainable Capacity Reserve: This is a one-time reserve to fund a 2017/18 regional GIS capacity building KCGIS Priority Initiatives that will enhance end-user agency applications and GIS return on investment. Reserve based on 2.5 percent of revenue. Enterprise GIS Operations (O&M): The KCGIS Center’s core business line is built around enterprise GIS infrastructure and operation services. Specific enterprise GIS operation services may be modified on a biennial basis in consultation with the King County GIS Technical Advisory Committee. For KCGIS’ 2015-16 budget years these services will be provided by 11.10 FTEs and include:  KCGIS Center management and administration  KCGIS governance support (GIS Steering & Technical Advisory Committees, standards & best practices, and annual KCGIS O&M Plan)  KCGIS program coordination (agency support & marketing)  Regional GIS contact and coordination  Spatial Data Warehouse operation and management (SDW administration, content management & metadata management)  KCGIS Website management  GIS productivity applications development & management (back-end apps, Web front-end apps, & client end-user apps)  Data maintenance coordination (coordinate agency data maintenance & QC, external data acquisition & designated enterprise data maintenance)  Regional imagery acquisition program  GIS-related contract management, including Esri enterprise license agreement and enterprise license management (ELM) based Esri software access  Education & Outreach (brownbag training, help desk, custom GIS training class development, regional KCGIS User Group)  Coordination of designated countywide priority GIS initiatives A key characteristic of most (but not all) core services for enterprise GIS operations is that they are ‘fixed-cost’ in nature. Total budget costs can be increased or decreased by adding or removing entire ‘service offerings,’ but costs are typically not greatly effected by the total number of individual end-users, the volume of use by those end-users, or by the number of agencies that fund the services. The KCGIS Center develops a preliminary budget to cover proposed enterprise GIS operation services levels for the coming two year budget period, in consultation with the GIS Technical Advisory Committee and the GIS Steering Committee. The KCGIS budget typically includes specific FTE and cost allocations for each service offering, to allow a business analysis of the value of providing the service.
  • 6. KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES: 2015/16 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, & BILLING PAGE 6 of 10 The KCGIS Center’s O&M funding model is based on the following premises:  Enterprise Operations can be defined into discrete categories of GIS services.  The level of work effort and total cost to provide each category of GIS services can be determined objectively via the KCGIS Center’s Time Recording System (TRS) and by KCGIS financial records.  Distinct GIS user communities can be identified and costs for each of the categories of GIS services can be objectively allocated to one or more of the user communities.  The level of use or benefit for individual agencies within each GIS user community can be measured objectively and O&M costs allocated to each agency on the basis of actual use or benefit The KCGIS Center allocated all its proposed 2015-16 budget Enterprise GIS Operations costs into 23 discrete categories of services, based on actual level of effort as documented in TRS (see appendix A). For 2015-16 two distinct GIS user communities were identified (desktop GIS users and web based GIS users). This is reflective of the findings of the 2012 King County GIS ROI Study conducted by the University of Washington Benefit-Cost Analysis Center that the primary financial benefit from GIS is derived from business end-users utilizing GIS based applications for county business purposes. GIS based applications are delivered via desktop GIS, web based GIS, and mobile platforms. The total cost for each category of GIS services is allocated proportionately to each GIS user community benefiting from the service. The total cost allocated to each GIS user community is then allocated to individual agencies within the community on the following basis:  Desktop GIS Users: Agencies are allocated costs that benefit desktop GIS users on the basis of the number of desktop GIS users within each agency. These costs are related to services that support standards, the spatial data warehouse, front-end applications, data maintenance/coordination, imagery acquisition, training/help desk support, and priority initiatives. This community represents KCGIS end users that use desktop GIS and costs are based on the actual number of GIS ‘seats’ within each department. Seats are defined as software licenses that can access the KCGIS Data Warehouse and hence benefit from the level of effort and cost to maintain and operate the warehouse. The O&M funding model recognizes that not all GIS enabled software is equal. The standard ‘seat’ is based upon use by an agency of basic ArcGIS software (ArcView) with a value of 1.0 within the funding model. Using annual software maintenance cost within the Esri ELA as a proxy for software capability, other software seat values are based on the following factors:  ArcView Secondary: 1.00  ArcView Primary: 1.40  ArcInfo Primary: 6.00  ArcInfo Secondary: 2.40  ArcEditor Primary: 3.00  ArcEditor Secondary: 2.40  Arc Extension Primary: 1.00  Arc Extension Secondary: 0.40  ArcPAD: 0.50  Esri Runtime License: 0.20  MapObjects Deployed: 0.20  ArcMobile: 0.20  ArcGIS for iPad, Android, etc.: 0.20  AutoCAD 0.10  City Engine 0.10  Maverick Map CAD 0.10  Maverick Map Mobile 0.01  Accela Permitting 0.10  xTracker 0.10  MS MapPoint: 0.10  Open Source Desktop S/W: 1.00 The list of desktop software ‘seats’ reflects the fact that GIS software capability that allows access to KCGIS Data and other enterprise services is diverse. Some users of ‘runtime’ licenses embedded in permitting or work order management software might not even realize that their application requires KGCIS data resources. Other ‘seats’ might not even be literal seats, as in the case of ArcPAD or ArcGIS for iPad or Android devices used by field personnel. The equivalency factors though ensure that all users pay a fair share for access to KCGIS Center resources. For 2015-16, the funding model is based on a total of 359.37 equivalent desktop GIS users.  Web GIS Users: Agencies are allocated costs that benefit Web GIS users on the basis of the number of ‘user sessions’ that access KCGIS Web Mapping applications within each agency. These costs are
  • 7. KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES: 2015/16 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, & BILLING PAGE 7 of 10 related to services that support the spatial data warehouse, front-end Web applications, imagery acquisition, training/help desk support, and priority initiatives. This community represents KCGIS end users that use Web GIS mapping and costs are based on the actual annual recorded number of ‘user sessions’ on the KCGIS Web mapping applications within each department (based on IP addresses mapped to IP address ranges assigned to county business units). For the 2015-16 budget, the funding model is based on 235,705 total ‘user sessions’ during 2013.  Note that in previous funding models, Esri ELM based GIS software usage was included in the GIS O&M funding model. Because these costs are related to the discretionary GIS-access platform for agency users, they do not fit the basis for the new model. For 2015-16, these costs will be recovered via mandatory GIS client –services charges. The aggregate of costs from each of these GIS user communities is allocated to each agency, to determine each agency’s total share of the GIS O&M funding model. Some agencies may have costs from just one community, while others have costs from both. The 2015-16 KCGIS Center Enterprise Operations Rates budget is comprised of the revenue required to cover the allocated costs as outlined above. It also includes an additional 5.46% to cover KCIT’s Mandated and Business Foundation (M&BF) costs, charged to each agency (see Appendix B). Note that the 5.46% M&BF costs are not added to external agency invoices for their funding for the KCGIS Center’s regional aerial imagery project. The proposed budget and funding model is subject to the same review and approval process that each fund faces for their annual budget. This process includes extensive review by the county budget office (OSPB), followed by further review and approval of the proposed budget by the County Executive for his budget submittal to Council. Once approved by the Council, the budget is finalized. Once the budget period begins, the KCGIS Center obtains POETA codes and billing concurrence from each of the agencies included in the KCGIS Enterprise Operations (O&M) funding model (budget account 55026). This concurrence is obtained via email and complies with KC Policy FIN 15-4. Automated GIS Rate billing is performed either monthly or quarterly as agreed with each agency. Billing is executed by the KCGIS Center using EBS/AxWay Secure Transport System based Smart Spreadsheets to create usage-based interfund transfers. For more details, refer to the KCGIS Center – EBS/AxWay Smart Spreadsheet Client Billing Procedure. GIS O&M revenue is posted as received to the KCGIS internal service fund (revenue account 44020) by the County’s EBS accounting system. The 5.46% M&BF costs added to the GIS O&M rates are posted as received into the appropriate designated KCIT revenue account. External Enterprise GIS Operations Revenue: Imagery acquisition is one of the designated GIS Enterprise Operations Services (D.3.e). When imagery acquisition projects include external funding partners and KCGIS serves as the project manager and/or fiscal agent, external revenue is posted as received to the KCGIS revenue account 44020, and credited to the designated imagery reserve fund. GIS Client Services: King County experience has been that all county agencies require customized, on-demand GIS services on occasion. This is true of departments with their own GIS staff (perhaps during periods of peak work load, for advanced training, or for very specialized types of service) and of departments with no integral GIS capability (perhaps needing services as simple as making a map or helping an employee learn to use a web based application). KCGIS Center provides on-demand GIS client services to meet the unique or unanticipated needs of county business units and of external customers. 5.40 FTE are assigned to client services for 2015/16. Typical services provided by the staff assigned to this business line include:  GIS training  GIS programming  Custom mapping  GIS data development or maintenance
  • 8. KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES: 2015/16 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, & BILLING PAGE 8 of 10  Short-term GIS staffing  GIS consulting  GIS needs assessment, planning, and implementation support  Custom GIS data requests Because of the on-demand nature of client services work, budget projections are speculative. KCGIS includes estimated costs and revenues for GIS client services as it develops its proposed annual budget, based on current year trends, past history, and conversations with client agencies who may request increased or decreased client services budgeting. Budgeted costs include labor and direct client services costs (supplies, services, hardware, software, training, etc.), plus an allocated proportion of KCGIS Center overhead, management, and administration. As the budget is developed, an hourly billing rate for the budget year is calculated by dividing total projected costs (labor, overhead, management, administration, and other direct costs) by the total number of projected billable hours. Annual average billable hours for individual client services staff are calculated by subtracting estimated employee leave and non-billable work hours from a nominal total of 2080 payroll hours per year. Specific types of leave and non-billable work hours include:  Leave (holidays, vacation, sick leave, jury duty, FMLA, etc.  Personal administration time (payroll, benefits, etc.)  KC & Div administration time (KC activity, communications, office, equipment, etc.)  Section administration (time records, performance monitoring, meetings, etc.)  Training & professional development  Client services marketing and customer relationship management  Product & service research and development For 2015/16, the calculated annual average net billable hours per client services FTE is 1337. The net annual estimated billable hours per client services FTE is multiplied by the total FTEs budgeted for client services work to determine total estimated billable hours. This total is divided into the total labor, supplies, management, administration, and overhead budget for client services to determine the hourly billing revenue requirement for the budget year. The KCIT 5.46% M&BF costs are added to the hourly billing revenue requirement and then rounded, to determine the final hourly billing rates. Tiered hourly billing rates are used to recognize labor cost differences for five basic categories of GIS staff. For current GIS Billing rates see: http://www.kingcounty.gov/operations/GIS/ClientServices/Prices.aspx. Some products or services (GIS data sales, map printing, and training classes) are provided on a per unit basis. Per unit costs are calculated from the hourly billing rate, plus the cost of any consumable products or special equipment. The KCGIS Center Client Services group also manages rental of the County’s King Street Center Computer Training Facility (CTF) to non-King County users. The facility has been owned jointly by KC DOT and DNRP. Revenue from rental to non-County users is held in a KCGIS Center designated fund reserve, for future Computer Training Facility equipment replacement. In addition, a budget is proposed for other direct non-labor reimbursable costs (media, software, commercial data, contracted consulting, etc.) that would typically be billed to clients separately. The KCGIS Center Client Services business line also includes three other reimbursements:  Providing Esri ELA based GIS software for dedicated use by county departments.  Providing pooled Esri GIS software for use by all county employees via an enterprise license management utility.  Also, the eight County Executive Departments are each charged to fund 0.15 FTE within client services for ‘KingStat’ GIS support to OSPB.
  • 9. KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES: 2015/16 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, & BILLING PAGE 9 of 10 These Esri software and KingStat GIS costs outlined above are billed to county agencies on a monthly or quarterly basis (see below). During the budget development process, KCGIS typically seeks budget commitments from departments for client services work for the coming year. For 2015 and 2016 these revenue commitments total approximately 82% and 79% respectively of the proposed client services budget. For budget purposes, an additional 6% - 9% of the proposed revenue is described as contingent from county agencies, and another 11% - 13% as contingent from outside agencies. Even though departments commit to earmark funds in their budget for KCGIS client services work, the decision to spend some of the budgeted funds (or other department funds if agency workload warrants) is made on a case-by-case basis by individual agency business unit managers. In effect, these managers make an individual benefit/cost analysis when they decide to spend agency funds for specific on-demand GIS client services. Agency reimbursement for Esri ELA software costs is not discretionary. It is based on prior year’s usage. Likewise, funding for KingStat is not discretionary. For KCGIS client services, budget review and approval does not directly involve client agencies. The KCGIS case to the budget office, Executive, and Council for this portion of the proposed budget is based on the funding reserve commitments, previous year’s actual client services activity, and recognition of a reasonable contingency to accommodate peak demand or emergency workload. This component of the proposed budget is subject to the same Budget Office, Executive, and Council review and approval process as outlined above. Once the budget year begins, agencies are billed for GIS client services work after work is completed, or monthly for projects that may extend over two or more months. Agencies can also prepay for GIS client services, establishing an account with the KCGIS Center that can be used to obtain future GIS training, services, or products at the rate in effect when the services are actually provided. Once the budget year begins, the KCGIS Center obtains standard POETA codes from each of the agencies with a KCGIS client services budget (budget account 55051) After agreed project work is completed, client billing is performed in either one lump sum, or monthly for more lengthy projects. Billing approval and POETA coding verification is obtained via email to comply with KC Policy FIN 15-4. . Billing is executed by the KCGIS Center using EBS/AxWay Secure Transport System based Smart Spreadsheets to create usage-based interfund transfers. For more details, refer to the KCGIS Center – EBS/AxWay Smart Spreadsheet Client Billing Procedure. For Esri ELA GIS software and KingStat GIS costs, at the beginning of the year, the KCGIS Center obtains POETA codes and billing concurrence from each of the agencies responsible form these costs. This concurrence is obtained via email and complies with KC Policy FIN 15-4. GIS Rate billing is performed either monthly or quarterly as agreed with each agency. Billing is executed by the KCGIS Center using EBS/AxWay Secure Transport System based Smart Spreadsheets to create usage-based interfund transfers. External client services customer work only commences after a signed project agreement and billing authorization is received. Customers are billed monthly or as major milestones are completed via invoice by KCGIS admin staff or through KC A/R. Some client services work requires prepayment:  Training registration. In 2016 KCGIS began accepting credit card payments for training classes.  Custom GIS data requests  Custom map printing GIS client services revenue is posted as received to the KCGIS internal service fund (revenue account 44021) by the County’s EBS accounting system. The 5.46% M&BF costs added to the GIS client services rates are transferred periodically to the designated KCIT revenue account. Matrix GIS Staffing Services Unit: Several King County departments have dedicated business specific GIS units or individual GIS staff. KCGIS Center directly manages and/or staffs GIS operations for eight divisions within the County:
  • 10. KCGIS CENTER FINANCIAL PROCEDURES: 2015/16 FUNDING, RATE SETTING, & BILLING PAGE 10 of 10 2015/16 Matrix GIS Staff Customers:  DNRP: WLRD  DNRP: WTD  DNRP: SWD  DNRP: Parks  DOT: Roads  DOT: KCIA  DPER  OSPB Staff levels are agreed on a biennial ‘negotiated level of service’ basis. The divisions benefit by reduced costs from pooled management and enhanced efficiency resulting from higher professional standards, cross training, redundancy, and best practices. Each division designates a GIS matrix manager, who is responsible both for evaluating the level of business need for direct GIS services within their division, and for coordinating the assignment of allocated staff to work on specific projects. 11.50 FTE are budgeted for 2015/16. Typical services provided by this business line includes:  Data development and maintenance  Custom application development  Mapping  GIS data analysis  End-user training and support KCGIS includes costs and revenues for Matrix GIS staffing services as it develops its proposed annual budget. In addition to the labor and direct costs (supplies, services, hardware, software, training, etc.) described above, funding and rates include an allocated proportion of KCGIS Center overhead, management, and administration. Initial budget review and approval is with the division GIS matrix manager, as well as division and department finance managers. This process ensures that there is customer support for proposed budget, based on the business value provided by the GIS staffing services. This component of the proposed budget does not go through review by the KCGIS Technical and Oversight committees, but is subject to the same Budget Office, Executive, and Council review and approval process as outlined above. The 2015-16 KCGIS Center Matrix Staff Rates budget is comprised of the revenue required to cover the allocated costs as outlined above. It also includes an additional 5.46% to cover KCIT’s Mandated and Business Foundation (M&BF) costs, charged to each agency (see Appendix B). Once the budget year begins, the KCGIS Center obtains POETA codes and billing concurrence from each of the agencies receiving GIS Matrixed staff services (agency budget account 55052). This concurrence is obtained via email and complies with KC Policy FIN 15-4. GIS Matrix Rate billing is performed either monthly or quarterly as agreed with each agency. Billing is executed by the KCGIS Center using EBS/AxWay Secure Transport System based Smart Spreadsheets to create usage-based interfund transfers. For more details, refer to the KCGIS Center – EBS/AxWay Smart Spreadsheet Client Billing Procedure. GIS Matrix revenue is posted as received to the KCGIS internal service fund (revenue account 44022) by the County’s EBS accounting system. The 5.46% M&BF costs added to the GIS Matrix rates are posted as received into the appropriate designated KCIT revenue account. Appendixes: A. KCGIS Center 2015-16 Budget By Business Services (PDF) B. KCGIS Center 2015-16 Rates & Revenue Budget (PDF) C. KCGIS Center 2015-16 Financial Plan (PDF) D. KCGIS Center 2015-16 Rates Basis Overview How can I get more information? Contact Greg Babinski, KCGIS Center Finance & Marketing Manager at greg.babinski@kingcounty.gov, or at 206-477-4402 GB: finance:procedures:kcgisfunding&billing2015-16.doc March 2, 2016
  • 11. KCGIS Center 2015-16KCGISProposed(20140723).xls Total Task Description Labor ODCs OH Total FTE's: KCGIS Center Enterprise Operations (O&M Funded): A. Manage & Administer the KCGIS Center 0.0000 1. Management 372,719 $ 11,107 $ 99,306 $ 483,132 $ 1.0500 2. Administration 48,727 $ 2,116 $ 18,915 $ 69,758 $ 0.2000 B. Enterprise Coordination 0.0000 1. KCGIS Governance Support: 0.0000 a. Oversight Committee 11,299 $ 317 $ 2,837 $ $14,454 0.0300 b. Technical Committee 25,606 $ 740 $ 6,620 $ $32,967 0.0700 d. O&M plan 57,065 $ 1,693 $ 15,132 $ $73,890 0.1600 2. Priority Initiatives: 548,392 $ 32,628 $ 184,425 $ $765,445 1.9500 3. Program Coordination: 0.0000 a. Agency Support 50,401 $ 1,587 $ 14,187 $ $66,174 0.1500 b Marketing 99,309 $ 5,673 $ 28,373 $ $133,356 0.3000 4. Regional Coordination: 35,768 $ 1,058 $ 9,458 $ $46,283 0.1000 C. KCGIS Enterprise Infrastructure 0.0000 1. SDW System Administration 47,110 $ 30,243 $ 14,187 $ $91,540 0.1500 2. SDW Data Content Management 567,395 $ 29,131 $ 184,425 $ $780,952 1.9500 3. SDW Metadata Management 29,874 $ 1,058 $ 9,458 $ $40,389 0.1000 D. Enterprise GIS Services 0.0000 1. KCGIS Website Administration 71,574 $ 2,645 $ 23,644 $ $97,863 0.2500 2. Application Development & Maintenance 0.0000 b. Back-end Applications 205,638 $ 9,657 $ 61,475 $ $276,771 0.6500 c. Web User Applications 162,386 $ 183,501 $ 47,289 $ $393,175 0.5000 d. Client User Applications 15,888 $ 45,331 $ 4,729 $ $65,947 0.0500 3. Data Maintenance & Coordination 0.0000 a. Agency Data Coordination 203,460 $ 7,405 $ 66,204 $ $277,069 0.7000 b. External Data Acquisition 67,745 $ 2,116 $ 18,915 $ $88,776 0.2000 c. Enterprise Data Maintenance 322,558 $ 12,694 $ 113,493 $ $448,744 1.2000 e. Imagery Program Management 35,768 $ 3,154,572 $ 9,458 $ $3,199,797 0.1000 4. Vendor Services Management - $ - $ - $ $0 0.0000 a. Contracts Administration 50,808 $ 1,587 $ 14,187 $ $66,582 0.1500 b. ELA License Management 39,483 $ 1,269 $ 11,349 $ $52,101 0.1200 5. Education & Outreach 0.0000 a. Training (Brownbags) 37,382 $ 1,269 $ 11,349 $ $50,000 0.1200 b. Resource Center 230,941 $ 8,463 $ 75,662 $ $315,065 0.8000 d. GIS User Meetings 13,061 $ 529 $ 4,729 $ $18,319 0.0500 Total: 3,350,357 $ 3,548,387 $ 1,049,806 $ 7,948,550 $ 11.1000 Total KCGIS Center Enterprise Operations (O&M) Budget: 7,948,550 $ Matrix GIS Staff & Operations: Matrix GIS Staff Labor Budgeted separately in Division Budgets: $3,122,070 11.0000 KCGIS Center Management, Supervision, & Admin Support: 158,890 $ 0.5000 Total DNRP GIS ODCs: 128,098 $ 11.5000 Matrix GIS Unit Portion of GIS Center Overhead: $929,085 Total KCGIS Center Budget for Matrixed GIS Services: $4,338,142 KCGIS Center Reimbursed Client Services: Total Reimbursed Client Services Direct Labor: 1,297,036 $ 4.6500 ment, Supervision, & Admin Support Costs…in Chargeback billing rate) 236,250 $ 0.7500 Charge-back ODCs 59,887 $ 5.4000 Charge-back portion of GIS Center Overhead: $124,674 2011 KCGIS Center Client Services/Charge-back Budget: Client Services Other (non-rate) reimbursable expenses: 598,538 $ Total GIS Client Services Budget: 2,316,386 $ Labor total verification: FY2011 Nominal KCGIS Chargeback Hourly Billing Rate: $122 (Assumes 130 billable hours per month per programmer or analyst) Total KCGIS Center Budget: 14,603,078 $ GB:gb W:excelFinanceFinance2015AdoptedBudget2015-16KCGISProposed(20140723).xls:KCGIS Center Total 3/2/2016:9:15 AM Appendix A
  • 12. Fund 5481M / Dept 011000 6.24% King County GIS Center Agency Common Name Agency ABT/Budget Name 2015 & 2016 Proposed O&M Revenue 2015 & 2016 Proposed O&M Rates (w/ 6.24% M&BF Costs) 2015-2016 2015-16 Client Services hours Based 2015-16 annualClient Services KingStat Based 2015-16 Dedicated GIS S/W Maintenance Based 2015-2016 Usage of Esri software ELM based access 2015-2016 Proposed Client Services Revenue 2015-2016 Proposed Client Services Rates (w/ 6.24% M&BF) 2015-2016 Proposed Matrix Revenue 2015-2016 Proposed Matrix Rates (w/ 6.24% M&BF) 2015-2016 Proposed Total GIS Revenue 2015-2016 Proposed Total GIS Rates (W/ 6.24% M&BF Costs) King County Council DISTRICT SUPPORT CONSTITUENT SERVICES 39,193 $ 41,639 $ 60,512 $ - $ 1,332 $ 61,844 $ 65,703 $ 101,037 $ 107,341 $ OEFA OFFICE OF E AND F ANALYSIS 21,003 $ 22,314 $ 66 $ 68 $ 72 $ 21,071 $ 22,386 $ PSB OPERATING AND CAPITAL BDGT 8,064 $ 8,567 $ 80,528 $ - $ 598 $ 81,126 $ 86,188 $ $210,420 223,550 $ 299,610 $ 318,305 $ KCSO BUDGET & ACCOUNTING 342,516 $ 363,889 $ 1 $ 21,755 $ 3,851 $ 25,607 $ 27,205 $ 368,123 $ 391,094 $ DES:OEM OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MGMNT 17,790 $ 18,900 $ 40,745 $ 2,967 $ 42 $ 43,754 $ 46,484 $ 61,544 $ 65,384 $ DES: Admin DES ADMINISTRATION 1,374 $ 1,459 $ - $ 6,958 $ 6,958 $ 7,392 $ 8,332 $ 8,852 $ DES: HR HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER 9 $ 9 $ - $ - $ - $ 9 $ 9 $ DES: Property Services REAL PROPERTY ADMIN 116,920 $ 124,216 $ 60,502 $ - $ 243 $ 60,745 $ 64,536 $ 177,666 $ 188,752 $ Prosecuting Attorney PAO ADMIN AND OPERTNS 8,825 $ 9,376 $ 60,511 $ 60,511 $ 64,287 $ 69,336 $ 73,662 $ Superior Court ADMINISTRATION 8,287 $ 8,804 $ - $ - $ - $ 8,287 $ 8,804 $ District Court COURTS ADMINISTRATION 5,345 $ 5,678 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,345 $ 5,678 $ DES: RALS:Animal Contol ANIMAL SVCS CONTROL 17,690 $ 18,794 $ - $ - $ - $ 17,690 $ 18,794 $ DES: RALS 13,876 $ 14,742 $ - $ - $ - $ 13,876 $ 14,742 $ Department of Elections GEOGRAPH INFO SVCS 136,502 $ 145,019 $ 20,256 $ - $ 13,585 $ 33,841 $ 35,952 $ $0 $0 170,342 $ 180,972 $ Judicial Administration ADMINISTRATION 11,369 $ 12,079 $ - $ - $ - $ 11,369 $ 12,079 $ KCC: BRB BOUNDARY REVIEW - $ - $ 15,617 $ 15,617 $ 16,592 $ 15,617 $ 16,592 $ Assessments SUPERVISION 692,448 $ 735,657 $ 162,981 $ 97,402 $ 23,372 $ 283,755 $ 301,462 $ 976,204 $ 1,037,119 $ DAJD ADMINISTRATION INTRGVRNMNTL ACCT ADLT CX (EN_910006) 12,247 $ 13,011 $ - $ 6,958 $ 6,958 $ 7,392 $ 19,205 $ 20,403 $ DAJD JUVENILE DETENTION INTRGVRNMNTL ACCT JUV CX (EN_910100) 2,158 $ 2,292 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,158 $ 2,292 $ DPD PUBLIC DEFENSE ADMINISTRATION 4,902 $ 5,208 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,902 $ 5,208 $ Total General Fund 1,460,517 $ 1,551,654 $ 501,654 $ 13,916 $ 122,124 $ 43,088 $ 680,784 $ 723,265 $ 210,420 $ 223,550 $ 2,351,721 $ 2,498,468 $ DES: Finance FINANCE DIRECTOR 18,458 $ 19,610 $ 8 $ - $ - $ 18,458 $ 19,610 $ Risk Management INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION1,288 $ 1,368 $ - $ - $ 1,288 $ 1,368 $ DPER PERMIT ADMINISTRATION 247,884 $ 263,352 $ 15,562 $ 6,958 $ 568 $ 23,087 $ 24,528 $ $216,756 $230,282 487,727 $ 518,162 $ DPER GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICES 247,884 $ 263,352 $ 3,966 $ - $ 100 $ 4,066 $ 4,320 $ $0 $0 251,950 $ 267,672 $ DNRP: Directors Office GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 18,030 $ 19,155 $ - $ 6,958 $ 6,958 $ 7,392 $ 24,988 $ 26,548 $ DNRP:HistoricPreservation HISTORIC PRESERVATION 7,951 $ 8,447 $ - $ 1,612 $ 1,612 $ 1,712 $ 9,563 $ 10,159 $ DES:HR:Benefits:HRIS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION (4) $ (5) $ - $ - $ - $ (4) $ (5) $ DES:E911 E911 IMPLEMENTATION 273,738 $ 290,819 $ 39,035 $ 19,530 $ 853 $ 59,417 $ 63,125 $ 333,155 $ 353,944 $ KCIT:Appl Design/Dev TECHNICAL SVCS ADMIN 58,192 $ 61,823 $ 195,206 $ 6,958 $ 5,249 $ 207,414 $ 220,356 $ 265,606 $ 282,179 $ DNRP:WTD Modelling GIS Upport - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $0 $0 - $ - $ DNRP:WTD TECH RESOURCE RECOVERY - $ - $ 37,651 $ 37,651 $ 40,000 $ $0 $0 37,651 $ 40,000 $ DNRP:WTD INDUSTRIAL WASTE - $ - $ 47,063 $ 47,063 $ 50,000 $ $0 $0 47,063 $ 50,000 $ DNRP:WTD COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING - $ - $ 4,706 $ 4,706 $ 5,000 $ $0 $0 4,706 $ 5,000 $ DNRP:WTD CENTRAL SERVICES CIP 208,549 $ 221,562 $ 114,924 $ 1,860 $ 8,364 $ 125,149 $ 132,958 $ 1,545,085 $ $1,641,498 1,878,782 $ 1,996,018 $ DOT: Directors Office TRANSP DIRECTOR 1,491 $ 1,584 $ 6,958 $ 294 $ 7,252 $ 7,704 $ 8,743 $ 9,288 $ DOT:IT (Transit) TRANSIT OH DIRECT CHARGES 565,376 $ 600,656 $ 3,717 $ 23,699 $ 27,416 $ 29,127 $ 592,792 $ 629,783 $ DES: Recorders O&M RECORDER'S O AND M FUND 75,287 $ 79,985 $ - $ - $ - $ 75,287 $ 79,985 $ KCIT:I-Net INET OPERATIONS - $ - $ 9,766 $ 9,766 $ 10,376 $ 9,766 $ 10,376 $ DNRP: Parks DIRECTORS OFFICE 148,294 $ 157,548 $ 77,113 $ 382 $ 15,409 $ 92,904 $ 98,702 $ $282,635 $300,272 523,834 $ 556,521 $ Capital (Budget to 640202, but for billing, validate Poeta) DIRECTORS OFFICE - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 94,212 $ 100,091 $ 94,212 $ 100,091 $ DES:HR:Safety&Claims WORKERS COMP PAYMENTS 8 $ 8 $ - $ - $ - $ 8 $ 8 $ DOT:AIRPORT GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 5,938 $ 6,308 $ 62,468 $ - $ 356 $ 62,824 $ 66,745 $ $206,576 $219,467 275,339 $ 292,520 $ DNRP:SWD SW ADMINISTRATION 43,050 $ 45,737 $ 377 $ 228 $ 605 $ 643 $ $381,874 $405,703 425,530 $ 452,083 $ DOT:Roads BUSINESS SYSTEMS 395,096 $ 419,750 $ 84,706 $ 618 $ 41,801 $ 127,125 $ 135,058 $ $192,914 $204,951 715,135 $ 759,759 $ DNRP:WLRD CENTRAL COSTS 885,583 $ 940,844 $ 3,270 $ 81,609 $ 84,879 $ 90,175 $ $1,172,857 $1,246,044 2,143,320 $ 2,277,063 $ DOT: Fleet FLEET ADMINISTRATION - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Public Health 2 ADMINISTRATION $ 186,231 $ 197,852 $ 35,634 $ 6,963 $ - $ 4,931 $ 47,528 50,494 $ 233,759 $ 248,346 $ Public Health: EMS 2 EMS ADMINISTRATION $ 58,187 $ 61,818 $ 12,442 $ - $ 12,442 13,218 $ 70,629 $ 75,036 $ DC&HS: Admin DIVISION DIRECTORS OFFIVCE 24,196 $ 25,706 $ 60,506 $ 6,963 $ 0 $ 67,469 $ 71,679 $ 91,666 $ 97,385 $ Total Non-General Fund 3,470,708 $ 3,687,280 $ 800,748 $ 41,758 $ 29,754 $ 185,082 $ 1,057,335 $ 1,123,312 $ 4,092,909 $ 4,348,307 $ 8,620,952 $ 9,158,899 $ Contingent Billing to KC Agencies 82,350 $ 82,350 $ 87,489 $ 82,350 $ 87,489 $ Contingent Billings to External Agencies 2,385,000 $ 2,385,000 $ 474,993 $ 474,993 $ 504,633 $ 2,859,993 $ 2,889,633 $ Total CX, Non-CX, and Outside Agencies 7,316,225 $ 7,623,934 $ 1,859,746 $ 55,674 $ 151,878 $ 228,170 $ 2,295,462 $ 2,438,698 $ 4,303,329 $ 4,571,857 $ 13,915,016 $ 14,634,489 $ 2015 & 2016 Proposed Revenue Detail with 2014 Adopted gb: W:WordFinanceProcedures2015-2016KCGIS_FRS&B_AppAKCGISAdopted2015-2016Rates(Final20140826).xlsxls:Rates and Revenue 3/2/2016 Appendix B 2015-16 KCGIS Center Budget: Agency Revenue Detail
  • 13. Appendix C Ref: Email from Y Wong 10/16/2014 after PSB-Council agreement regarding correction of allocation of WTD rent by FMD to KCGIS; Rev 2015/2016 from 'Proposed' to 'Adopted' 12/23/14 Category 2013/2014 Budget 2013/2014 BTD Actuals 1 2013/2014 Estimated 2 2015/2016 Adopted 2017/2018 Projected 3 2019/2020 Projected 3 Beginning Fund Balance 995,687 $ 1,657,275 $ 1,657,275 $ 2,043,970 1,399,843 726,735 Revenues Agency O&M Rates 5,211,609 3,621,349 4,996,880 5,238,923 5,684,231 6,110,549 Agency Matrix Rates 3,765,632 2,388,280 3,699,268 4,571,972 4,960,590 5,332,634 Agency Client Services Rates 1,904,139 758,167 1,263,359 2,029,077 1,968,089 2,255,720 Federal Grants 0 117,747 140,126 - - - External Imagery Revenue 900,000 220,569 241,572 2,385,000 1,502,725 1,615,429 External Client Services Revenue 234,438 295,589 449,244 504,633 547,526 588,591 Credit to KCIT for M&BF Costs Collected 4 (575,501) (88,667) (719,473) (772,977) (839,175) Total Revenues 11,440,316 7,401,701 10,701,784 14,010,132 13,890,183 15,063,748 Expenditures Wages, Benefits and Retirement (7,775,644) (5,571,092) (7,652,945) (8,113,051) (8,478,138) (8,859,654) Capital (73,683) (3,171) (35,514) - (294,592) Direct Services (2,562,263) (987,023) (1,509,058) (4,339,646) (3,489,930) (3,646,977) Intergovernmental Services (1,100,522) (811,323) (1,117,571) (2,201,561) (2,300,632) (2,404,160) Total Expenditures (11,512,112) (7,372,609) (10,315,089) (14,654,258) (14,563,292) (14,910,792) Estimated Underexpenditures 57,561 Other Fund Transactions Ending Fund Balance 981,450 1,686,367 2,043,970 1,399,843 726,735 879,691 Reserves Expenditure Reserves: GIS Equipment Reserve5 (57,738) (203,214) (203,214) Training Room External Revenue Reserve6 (21,779) (16,229) (21,729) (21,729) Prepaid Client Services Reserve7 (81,825) (143,028) (108,527) (108,527) Imagery Fund Reserve 8 (76,749) (718,709) (460,926) (111,926) (111,926) (111,926) Data Center Move Reserve 9 (23,000) (23,000) (23,000) Cash Flow Reserve(s) Revenue Variance Reserve 10 (310,774) (310,774) (310,774) (294,592) (293,263) (318,058) Strategic Sustainable Capacity Reserve 11 (294,592) Total Reserves (571,865) (1,414,954) (1,128,170) (831,366) (405,189) (429,984) Reserve Shortfall - - - - - - Ending Undesignated Fund Balance 12 409,585 271,414 915,800 568,477 321,545 449,707 Financial Plan Notes: 9 Utilization of Data Center Move reserve based on $3,000 in 2010 & $6,000 subsequent years. This reserve to be liquidated in 2015-16. 10 Revenue Variance Reserve: To be partially liquidated in 2015-2016 to mitigate GIS O&M rate increases and to align with County fund balance policy and guidance; target was 2 percent of revenue budgets (less than the most recent fund deficit 3 percent in 2010) (except external agency imagery revenue) to protect against service request volatility. 11 This fund intends to target a $0 ending undesignated fund balance, but establish a one-time 2015/16 Strategic Regional Sustainable Capacity reserve to fund a 2017/18 regional GIS capacity building KCGIS Priority Initiatives that will enhance end-user agency applications and GIS return on investment. Reserve based on 2 percent of 2015/16 revenue. 12 It is necessary to maintain the 15/16 undesignated fund balance shown to avoid a large increase in the following two bienniums, which would otherwise occur due to the large 15/16 budget deficit. 2015/2016 KCGIS Center Adopted Financial Plan King County GIS Center Operating Fund / 000005481 2 2013/2014 Estimated reflects actual revenues and expenditures for 2013 and through June 30, 2014 and estimated revenues and expenditures for the remainder of 2014. 1 2013/2014 Biennial-to-Date (BTD) Actuals reflects actual revenue and expenditure totals for 2013 and through June 30, 2014, based on financial system EBS Report GL_RPRT_030. 2013/14 actual beginning fund balance based on Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). 3 Outyear projections were based on the following assumptions: an aggregate revenue increase of 8.5 percent to 2017/18, another 7.5 percent increase in 2019/2020. Expenditure growth in out year biennials is 4.5 percent, assuming $1 million less in 2017/18 in regional imagery costs. 4 Mandated & Business Foundation (M&BF) Costs: estimated collection for KCIT MB&F services is applied as a percentage of revenue (2013-14 = 5.45%; 2015-20 = 6.24%) of GIS services rendered. This revenue is to be transferred to the KCIT Services Fund. 5 Equipment Reserve established to fund replacement of core GIS data servers to ensure effective on-going operation. Reserve eliminated in 2015-16 (to help mitigate GIS O&M rate increase), now that KCIT is providing all equipment via the KCIT service order form charges. 6 King Street Center training room rental revenue is held to provide a GIS training credits fund for county agencies and a portion of the training room rental revenue is transferred to KCIT to offset their maintenance of the training computers. 7 Prepaid Client Services: represents balance of prepaid client services revenue received, minus work completed on account. 8 Imagery fund reserve fluctuates based on best imagery acquisition commercial terms and biennial major acquisition cycle. Reserve balance also fluctuates based on the amount of imagery funding revenue from GIS O&M rates and revenue paid by regional partner agencies ($85,837 held for City of Seattle at the end of 2014). W:WordFinanceProcedures2015-2016KCGIS_FRS&B_AppAApp8.3F5481 KCGIS 2015-2016 Adopted Financial Plan.xlsx:2015 16 Proposed Budget 3/2/2016 Appendix C