The document discusses the coordination of activities between state bodies after the creation of a new commission. It outlines principles of coordination such as equality, voluntary acceptance of decisions, and independence in implementation. Procedures for decision making in coordination bodies are also covered, including composition of members, quorum requirements, and methods for reaching consensus.

1. Coordination of activities
First steps after creation of
commission
Kateryna Myasnykova,
Independent assosiation of broadcasters

2. Starting points
 Digitalization in Ukraine
has nature of
revolutionary and forced
process
 All participants are going
to invest a lot but could
wait for results for log
time
 Reform could be made
only in cooperation in
such shirt terms

3. Coordination…
 «Coordination" (from Latin) – harmonization - joint,
streamline operations.
 Coordination of state bodies’ activity - is
elaboration, joint discussion, and then
implementation of common events within each
body’s authority on the most urgent social
problems.
 The purpose of coordination of state bodies’
activity:
 improving the efficiency of government bodies of
interagency issues.

4. Coordination tasks :
 conflict resolution: by engaging in collective
decision-making process more parties with
different interests and independent experts
 prevention of duplicate actions: through joint
planning of activities
 increased influence: through using of
authority, methods and tools which are
common to all participants.

5. Principles of coordination :
 equality of all participants
(coordinator access to authority
changes the character of the
relationship into completely different
– subordinate ones)
 voluntary acceptance of adopted
decisions’ obligatoriness

6. Principles of coordination :
 independence of every public
authority in implementation of
decisions, within its authority
 the head of each authority is
responsible for implementation of
agreed decisions

7. Forms of coordination among
state bodies :
 exchange information and experience;
 Establishment of joint bodies for discussing
issues, exchanging information and experience
(advices)
 establishment of joint bodies for conducting
occasional joint activities (Organizing
Committees)
 Conducting of joint activities (research,
education and training, public discussions etc..)

8. Forms of coordination among
state bodies :
 establishment of joint coordinating bodies
to organize durable joint activities
(interagency commissions)
 Joint planning of activities
 Joint publication of regulations
 establishment of joint executive bodies for
implementation of joined decisions (e.g.,
conducting integrated audits)

9. Members of coordination
bodies:
 from the state:
 representatives of public authorities and
administration
 representatives of self government
 from society:
 Representatives of public organizations,
 Experts (representatives of academic
institutions, practitioners)
 from industry:
 Representatives of industry associations
 Representatives of individual businesses

10. Provision on commission should
include:
 name of the interagency commission and the
purpose of its creation
 office chair (co-chairs)
 composition of ex officio of deputy chairman
and executive secretary
 composition of ex officio representatives of the
agencies that implement committee's
decisions;

11. Provision on commission should
include:
 state bodies and local governments, and
organizations whose representatives are included
in the interdepartmental commission for
coordination
 decision-making procedures and bringing them to
the bodies responsible for implementing the
decisions of the Commission
 authorities of the chairman, executive secretary
of the Commission and its members
 term of bodies formed for a certain period

12. Порядок принятия коллегиальных
решений
 предусматривать ли кворум (если существуют
предпосылки для формирования внутри комиссии «групп
по интересам») ;
 все ли члены комиссии имеют равный статус при
голосовании:
 есть ли совещательные голоса,
 есть ли решающий голос при равном количестве голосов,
(м.б. и при нечетном количестве голосующих, если есть
воздержавшиеся);
 есть ли право вето (фактически оно есть у Нацсовета и
РНБО, исходя из их статуса?);
 принятие решения:
 консенсусом
 голосованием
 простое большинство или квалифицированное?
 поименное голосование или простой подсчет голосов;
 отдельное мнение.

13. Procedure of making group
decisions
 providing a quorum (if there are prerequisites for the
formation within the Commission of "interest groups");
 all committee members have equal status in the voting:
 Is there a deliberative vote
 Is there a decisive vote in case of equal number of votes
(possible even when the number of voting is odd number in
case there are abstentions)
 Is there a right of veto
 Making decisions:
 Consensus
 Vote
 a simple majority or qualified?
 individual vote or a simple counting of votes
 a separate opinion

14. First steps
 Reform aim
 Role of state
 Business model
 Action plan