SlideShare a Scribd company logo
City Study 2019: Kansas City, Missouri
Acknowledgement
• Student-level data were provided by the Missouri
Department of Elementary and Secondary
Education.
Note: The School Smart Kansas City assisted CREDO with verifying the list of public schools in Kansas City.
This Report
• This report on Kansas City, Missouri is one in a series of studies
examining school performance across selected U.S. cities.
• Performance is defined as how much academic growth students
made from one year to the next.
• The performance of students in Kansas City is benchmarked to the
state average, accounting for student characteristics.
• We first track the growth of Kansas City overall and by sector using
data from 2013-14 to 2016-17.
• We then further explore how one-year academic growth for the
period ending in Spring 2017 differs by sector, school type, race,
poverty status, English language learner (ELL) status, special
education status, and gender.
Types of Charters
• CMO: Charter Management Organizations
• To qualify as a CMO, an organization must oversee the operation of at least
three charter schools. Further, the CMO must be the charter holder for all of
the schools operated by the CMO.
• EMO: Education Management Organizations
• To qualify as an EMO, an organization must provide services under contract
to at least three separate charter schools, but does not hold the charter for
any school they serve. The EMO must answer to the school’s charter holder
in addition to authorizers and state governance.
• Independent Charter Schools
• To qualify as an independent charter school, an organization must oversee
the operation of a single charter school. The charter-holding organization
may run the school directly or they may contract with an organization which
provides services to one or two charter schools.
Presentation of Results
• The results display two sets of comparisons
• The progress of Kansas City students is benchmarked against the state
average learning gains, accounting for student characteristics.
• Positive numbers represent better than average performance.
• Negative numbers represent worse than average performance.
• Significance in the difference between students in the city and the
average state performance is represented by black asterisks.
• The progress of charter school students within Kansas City is then
compared to the performance of similar TPS students within Kansas
City.
• Significance in the difference between a student group in charter
schools and the same student group in TPS is represented by colored
asterisks.
Measurement of Academic Growth
• Results are graphically displayed on two axes:
• The left axis indicates learning gains of Kansas City students relative to the average
learning gains of students with similar characteristics in the state, measured in
standard deviation units.
• The right axis displays the same learning gains measured in days of learning.
• The baseline of 0.00 represents 180 days of learning.
• Positive performance translates to more days of learning.
• Negative performance represents fewer days of learning.
• The table below shows a transformation of standard deviation units to
days of learning.
Standard Deviations Days of Learning
0.05 30
0.10 59
0.15 89
0.20 118
0.25 148
0.30 177
0.35 207
Roadmap for Graphs
PRELIMINARY DRAFT 7
•Black Students
•Hispanic Students
Race
•Poverty Status
•English Language Learner Status
•Special Education Status
Subgroup
•Female Students
•Male Students
Gender
Overall
Kansas City
Results
All Students
Breakout by Further Breakout by
This menu includes links to specific analyses throughout the report.
In the following slides, the same menu is shown on the right-hand side.
•Charter Network
•School-Level
Sector
Comparison of Peers
Kansas City Analysis: All Students
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Average One-Year Learning Gains for All Kansas City Students
Compared to the State Average Learning Gains, by Year and Subject
Overall Kansas City
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in the Spring of each school year (SY).
0.00
0.04 0.05
0.00
0.02
0.02
-89
-59
-30
0
30
59
89
118
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
SY 2014-2015 SY 2015-2016 SY 2016-2017
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Growth
(in
Standard
Deviations)
* Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01
ELA Math
Sector Analysis
Sector Analysis
(Math)
Sector Analysis
(ELA)
Click the buttons below for English Language Arts (ELA) and math growth of
Kansas City schools relative to the state average learning gains by year and
sector.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
Sector Analysis: ELA
Learning Gains in ELA for Students in Kansas City Charter Schools,
Kansas City Magnet (Signature) Schools and Kansas City Non-Magnet
TPS Compared to the State Average Learning Gains by Year
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in the Spring of each school year (SY).
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
[C] 0.05
[C] 0.11**
[C] 0.09**
[T] -0.10**
[T] -0.08
[T] -0.03
[M]0.09
[M]0.09
[M]0.13*
-89
-59
-30
0
30
59
89
118
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
SY 2014-2015 SY 2015-2016 SY 2016-2017
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Growth
(in
Standard
Deviations)
* Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01
Charter TPS Magnet (Signature)
*
*
*
*
*
*
Sector Analysis: Math
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in the Spring of each school year (SY).
Learning Gains in Math for Students in Kansas City Charter Schools,
Kansas City Magnet (Signature) Schools and Kansas City Non-Magnet
TPS Compared to the State Average Learning Gains by Year
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
[C] 0.06
[C] 0.10
[C] 0.07
[T] -0.09*
[T] -0.07 [T] -0.06
[M]0.03
[M]-0.02
[M]0.05
-89
-59
-30
0
30
59
89
118
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
SY 2014-2015 SY 2015-2016 SY 2016-2017
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Growth
(in
Standard
Deviations)
* Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01
Charter TPS Magnet (Signature)
*
*
Charter Network Analysis
Learning Gains for Students in Kansas City Network-Affiliated Charter
Schools and Independent Kansas City Charter Schools Compared to
the State Average Learning Gains, by Subject
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
-0.04
0.07*
0.11**
-0.16*
-0.02
0.11
-118
-89
-59
-30
0
30
59
89
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
Kansas City CMO Kansas City EMO Kansas City Independent
Charter
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Growth
(in
Standard
Deviations)
* Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01
ELA Math
*
School-Level Performance by Sector
Click the buttons below for ELA and math growth of individual Kansas City
schools relative to the state average by sector. The upper cluster of dots shows
where individual charter schools lie on spectrum of growth, and the lower cluster
shows that of individual TPS.
School Growth
(Math)
School Growth
(ELA)
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
School Growth by Sector - ELA
Distribution of ELA Learning Gains of Individual Kansas City Schools
Compared to the State Average Learning Gains
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
-0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Growth (in Standard Deviations)
Charter
TPS
Overall Kansas City
School Growth by Sector - Math
Distribution of Math Learning Gains of Individual Kansas City
Schools Compared to the State Average Learning Gains
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Growth (in Standard Deviations)
Charter
TPS
Overall Kansas City
Race Analysis
Hispanic
Students
Black
Students
Click the buttons below for graphs showing the performance of Black students in
Kansas City or Hispanic students in Kansas City relative to the statewide average
learning gains for students of the same race.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
Race Analysis:
Black Students
Learning Gains for All Kansas City Black Students Compared to the
Average Learning Gains of Black Students Statewide, by Subject
Black
Students
by Sector
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of Black students in the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
0.06
0.03
-118
-89
-59
-30
0
30
59
89
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Growth
(in
Standard
Deviations)
* Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01
ELA Math
Race Analysis:
Black Students by Sector
Learning Gains for Black Charter School Students and Black TPS
Students in Kansas City Compared to the Average Learning Gains of
Black Students Statewide, by Subject
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of Black students in the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
0.11**
0.00
0.09
-0.05
-89
-59
-30
0
30
59
89
118
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Kansas City Charter Black Students Kansas City TPS Black Students
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Growth
(in
Standard
Deviations)
* Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01
ELA Math
*
Race Analysis:
Hispanic Students
Learning Gains for All Kansas City Hispanic Students Compared to the
Average Learning Gains of Hispanic Students Statewide, by Subject
Hispanic
Students
by Sector
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of Hispanic students in the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
0.02 0.01
-118
-89
-59
-30
0
30
59
89
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Growth
(in
Standard
Deviations)
* Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01
ELA Math
Race Analysis:
Hispanic Students by Sector
Learning Gains for Hispanic Charter School Students and Hispanic TPS
Students in Kansas City Compared to the Average Learning Gains of
Hispanic Students Statewide, by Subject
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of Hispanic students in the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
0.03
0.00
0.04
-0.01
-118
-89
-59
-30
0
30
59
89
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
Kansas City Charter
Hispanic Students
Kansas City TPS
Hispanic Students
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Growth
(in
Standard
Deviations)
* Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01
ELA Math
Subgroup Analyses
English
Language
Learner (ELL)
Status
Poverty Status
Special
Education Status
Click the buttons below for graphs showing the performance of Kansas City
students in poverty, Kansas City students with English Language Learner
designation, or Kansas City students receiving special education services relative
to average learning gains of students of the same subgroup statewide.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
Subgroup Analyses:
Poverty Status Analysis
Learning Gains for All Kansas City Students in Poverty Compared to the
Average Learning Gains of Students in Poverty Statewide, by Subject
Poverty
Status
by Sector
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of students in poverty in the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
0.05
0.02
-89
-59
-30
0
30
59
89
118
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Growth
(in
Standard
Deviations)
* Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01
ELA Math
Subgroup Analyses:
Poverty Status by Sector
Learning Gains for Kansas City Charter School Students in Poverty and
Kansas City TPS Students in Poverty Compared to the Average
Learning Gains of Students in Poverty Statewide, by Subject
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of students in poverty in the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
0.09**
0.01
0.07
-0.03
-89
-59
-30
0
30
59
89
118
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Kansas City Charter
Students in Poverty
Kansas City TPS
Students in Poverty
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Growth
(in
Standard
Deviations)
* Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01
ELA Math
Subgroup Analyses:
English Language Learner Status Analysis
Learning Gains for All ELL Students in Kansas City Compared to the
Average Learning Gains of ELL Students Statewide, by Subject
ELL
Status
by Sector
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of ELL students in the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
0.01
-0.02
-118
-89
-59
-30
0
30
59
89
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Growth
(in
Standard
Deviations)
* Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01
ELA Math
Subgroup Analyses:
English Language Learner Status by Sector
Learning Gains for ELL Students in Kansas City Charter Schools and ELL
Students in Kansas City TPS Compared to the Average Learning Gains
of ELL Students Statewide, by Subject
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of ELL students in the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
0.03
0.00
0.02
-0.05
-118
-89
-59
-30
0
30
59
89
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
ELL Students in
Kansas City Charter Schools
ELL Students in
Kansas City TPS
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Growth
(in
Standard
Deviations)
* Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01
ELA Math
Subgroup Analyses:
Special Education Status Analysis
Learning Gains for All Kansas City Students in Special Education
Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Students in Special
Education Statewide, by Subject
Special
Ed.
by Sector
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of students in Special Ed. in the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
0.02
-0.05
-148
-118
-89
-59
-30
0
30
59
89
118
-0.25
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Growth
(in
Standard
Deviations)
* Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01
ELA Math
Subgroup Analyses:
Special Education Status by Sector
Learning Gains for Kansas City Charter School Students in Special Ed.
and Kansas City TPS Students in Special Ed. Compared to the Average
Learning Gains of Students in Special Ed. Statewide, by Subject
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of students in Special Ed. in the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
0.18**
-0.09
0.07
-0.13*
-118
-89
-59
-30
0
30
59
89
118
148
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Kansas City Charter Students
in Special Ed.
Kansas City TPS Students
in Special Ed.
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Growth
(in
Standard
Deviations)
* Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01
ELA Math
* *
Gender Analysis
Male
Students
Female
Students
Click the buttons below for graphs showing the performance of female students in
Kansas City or male students in Kansas City relative to statewide average
learning gains for the same gender.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
Gender Analysis:
Female Students
Learning Gains for All Kansas City Female Students Compared to the
Average Learning Gains of Female Students Statewide, by Subject
Female
Students
by Sector
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of female students in the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
0.05
0.04
-89
-59
-30
0
30
59
89
118
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Growth
(in
Standard
Deviations)
* Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01
ELA Math
Gender Analysis:
Female Students by Sector
Learning Gains for Female Charter School Students and Female TPS
Students in Kansas City Compared to the Average Learning Gains of
Female Students Statewide, by Subject
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of female students in the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
0.08*
0.02
0.10
-0.02
-89
-59
-30
0
30
59
89
118
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Kansas City Charter Female Students Kansas City TPS Female Students
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Growth
(in
Standard
Deviations)
* Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01
ELA Math
Gender Analysis:
Male Students
Learning Gains for All Kansas City Male Students Compared to the
Average Learning Gains of Male Students Statewide, by Subject
Male
Students
by Sector
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of male students in the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
0.05*
0.00
-89
-59
-30
0
30
59
89
118
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Growth
(in
Standard
Deviations)
* Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01
ELA Math
Gender Analysis:
Male Students by Sector
Learning Gains for Male Charter School Students and Male TPS
Students in Kansas City compared to the Average Learning Gains of
Male Students Statewide, by Subject
The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of male students in the entire state.
These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017.
Sector Analysis
Race Analysis
Subgroup Analysis
Roadmap
for Graphs
Gender Analysis
• Charter Network
• School-Level
• Black Students
• Hispanic Students
• Poverty Status
• ELL Status
• Special Ed. Status
• Female Students
• Male Students
Overall Kansas City
0.09**
0.01
0.05
-0.04
-89
-59
-30
0
30
59
89
118
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Kansas City Charter Male Students Kansas City TPS Male Students
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Growth
(in
Standard
Deviations)
* Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01
ELA Math
Summary of Findings
The summary of the findings from the analysis of
Kansas City schools is presented here.

More Related Content

What's hot

Memphis, TN 2019 - City Study
Memphis, TN 2019 - City StudyMemphis, TN 2019 - City Study
Camden NJ 2019 - City Study
Camden NJ 2019 - City StudyCamden NJ 2019 - City Study
Newark, NJ 2021
Newark, NJ 2021Newark, NJ 2021
Austin slide deck
Austin slide deckAustin slide deck
Fort Worth, TX 2021
Fort Worth, TX 2021Fort Worth, TX 2021
Baton Rouge LA 2019 - City Study
Baton Rouge LA 2019 - City StudyBaton Rouge LA 2019 - City Study
Baton Rouge LA 2019 - City Study
Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO)
 
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010WSU Cougars
 
The Racial College Completion Gap by Stella M. Flores (New York University)
The Racial College Completion Gap by Stella M. Flores (New York University)The Racial College Completion Gap by Stella M. Flores (New York University)
The Racial College Completion Gap by Stella M. Flores (New York University)
EduSkills OECD
 
2016 Building a Grad Nation webinar slides
2016 Building a Grad Nation webinar slides2016 Building a Grad Nation webinar slides
2016 Building a Grad Nation webinar slides
America's Promise Alliance
 
NAEP release
NAEP releaseNAEP release
NAEP release
EducationNC
 
Final fwlp fwcc 5.9.17v3
Final fwlp fwcc   5.9.17v3Final fwlp fwcc   5.9.17v3
Final fwlp fwcc 5.9.17v3
Read Fort Worth
 
2015 ConnCAN NAEP Analysis
2015 ConnCAN NAEP Analysis2015 ConnCAN NAEP Analysis
2015 ConnCAN NAEP Analysis
ConnCAN
 
ConnCAN_sbac_analysis_09-03-2015
ConnCAN_sbac_analysis_09-03-2015ConnCAN_sbac_analysis_09-03-2015
ConnCAN_sbac_analysis_09-03-2015
ConnCAN
 
Benchmarks2018
Benchmarks2018Benchmarks2018
Session_2143_handout_175_0
Session_2143_handout_175_0Session_2143_handout_175_0
Session_2143_handout_175_0John Ingram
 
The College Blue Book instructional guide
The College Blue Book instructional guideThe College Blue Book instructional guide
The College Blue Book instructional guide
Colleen Malone
 
Rfw 100 x25fwtx rotary fw pp tv2 1.26.18
Rfw 100 x25fwtx rotary fw pp tv2 1.26.18Rfw 100 x25fwtx rotary fw pp tv2 1.26.18
Rfw 100 x25fwtx rotary fw pp tv2 1.26.18
Read Fort Worth
 
China delegation 06.12.17 v1
China delegation 06.12.17 v1China delegation 06.12.17 v1
China delegation 06.12.17 v1
Louis Soares
 
College Readiness for All final
College Readiness for All finalCollege Readiness for All final
College Readiness for All finalSabrina Matthews
 

What's hot (20)

Memphis, TN 2019 - City Study
Memphis, TN 2019 - City StudyMemphis, TN 2019 - City Study
Memphis, TN 2019 - City Study
 
Camden NJ 2019 - City Study
Camden NJ 2019 - City StudyCamden NJ 2019 - City Study
Camden NJ 2019 - City Study
 
Newark, NJ 2021
Newark, NJ 2021Newark, NJ 2021
Newark, NJ 2021
 
Austin slide deck
Austin slide deckAustin slide deck
Austin slide deck
 
Fort Worth, TX 2021
Fort Worth, TX 2021Fort Worth, TX 2021
Fort Worth, TX 2021
 
Baton Rouge LA 2019 - City Study
Baton Rouge LA 2019 - City StudyBaton Rouge LA 2019 - City Study
Baton Rouge LA 2019 - City Study
 
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
 
The Racial College Completion Gap by Stella M. Flores (New York University)
The Racial College Completion Gap by Stella M. Flores (New York University)The Racial College Completion Gap by Stella M. Flores (New York University)
The Racial College Completion Gap by Stella M. Flores (New York University)
 
2016 Building a Grad Nation webinar slides
2016 Building a Grad Nation webinar slides2016 Building a Grad Nation webinar slides
2016 Building a Grad Nation webinar slides
 
NAEP release
NAEP releaseNAEP release
NAEP release
 
Final fwlp fwcc 5.9.17v3
Final fwlp fwcc   5.9.17v3Final fwlp fwcc   5.9.17v3
Final fwlp fwcc 5.9.17v3
 
2015 ConnCAN NAEP Analysis
2015 ConnCAN NAEP Analysis2015 ConnCAN NAEP Analysis
2015 ConnCAN NAEP Analysis
 
ConnCAN_sbac_analysis_09-03-2015
ConnCAN_sbac_analysis_09-03-2015ConnCAN_sbac_analysis_09-03-2015
ConnCAN_sbac_analysis_09-03-2015
 
Benchmarks2018v1-2019
Benchmarks2018v1-2019Benchmarks2018v1-2019
Benchmarks2018v1-2019
 
Benchmarks2018
Benchmarks2018Benchmarks2018
Benchmarks2018
 
Session_2143_handout_175_0
Session_2143_handout_175_0Session_2143_handout_175_0
Session_2143_handout_175_0
 
The College Blue Book instructional guide
The College Blue Book instructional guideThe College Blue Book instructional guide
The College Blue Book instructional guide
 
Rfw 100 x25fwtx rotary fw pp tv2 1.26.18
Rfw 100 x25fwtx rotary fw pp tv2 1.26.18Rfw 100 x25fwtx rotary fw pp tv2 1.26.18
Rfw 100 x25fwtx rotary fw pp tv2 1.26.18
 
China delegation 06.12.17 v1
China delegation 06.12.17 v1China delegation 06.12.17 v1
China delegation 06.12.17 v1
 
College Readiness for All final
College Readiness for All finalCollege Readiness for All final
College Readiness for All final
 

Similar to Kansas City, MO 2019 - City Study

Kansas_City_slide_deck_FINAL.pdf
Kansas_City_slide_deck_FINAL.pdfKansas_City_slide_deck_FINAL.pdf
Kansas_City_slide_deck_FINAL.pdf
Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO)
 
Camden, NJ
Camden, NJCamden, NJ
San Antonio, TX - 2022 Charter School Study by CREDO
San Antonio, TX - 2022 Charter School Study by CREDOSan Antonio, TX - 2022 Charter School Study by CREDO
San Antonio, TX - 2022 Charter School Study by CREDO
Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO)
 
2022 Austin Chart School City Study
2022 Austin Chart School City Study2022 Austin Chart School City Study
2022 Austin Chart School City Study
Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO)
 
Washington DC. City Study 2022
Washington DC. City Study 2022Washington DC. City Study 2022
Indianapolis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220601.pdf
Indianapolis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220601.pdfIndianapolis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220601.pdf
Indianapolis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220601.pdf
Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO)
 
2022 Houston Chart School City Study
2022 Houston Chart School City Study2022 Houston Chart School City Study
2022 Houston Chart School City Study
Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO)
 
New Orleans
New OrleansNew Orleans
batonrouge_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdf
batonrouge_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdfbatonrouge_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdf
batonrouge_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdf
Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO)
 
memphis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdf
memphis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdfmemphis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdf
memphis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdf
Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO)
 
DC_slide_deck_FINAL (1).pdf
DC_slide_deck_FINAL (1).pdfDC_slide_deck_FINAL (1).pdf
Denver, CO 2022 - City Study
Denver, CO 2022 - City StudyDenver, CO 2022 - City Study
St_Louis_slide_deck_FINAL.pdf
St_Louis_slide_deck_FINAL.pdfSt_Louis_slide_deck_FINAL.pdf
2022 Newark Chart School City Study
2022 Newark Chart School City Study2022 Newark Chart School City Study
2022 Newark Chart School City Study
Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO)
 
TEA Data Presentation - Group 1
TEA Data Presentation - Group 1TEA Data Presentation - Group 1
TEA Data Presentation - Group 1
Rachel Reis Mourao
 
A First Look at Trends and Bright Spots in St. Louis School Performance Post...
A First Look at Trends and Bright Spots in St. Louis School Performance  Post...A First Look at Trends and Bright Spots in St. Louis School Performance  Post...
A First Look at Trends and Bright Spots in St. Louis School Performance Post...
The Opportunity Trust
 
2022 Fort Worth Charter School City Study
2022 Fort Worth Charter School City Study2022 Fort Worth Charter School City Study
2022 Fort Worth Charter School City Study
Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO)
 
Child in America
Child in AmericaChild in America
Child in Americaksiguenza
 
about data.pdf
about data.pdfabout data.pdf
about data.pdf
sdfghj21
 
Westfall in the News- Report card rating
Westfall in the News- Report card ratingWestfall in the News- Report card rating
Westfall in the News- Report card ratingJD Williamson
 

Similar to Kansas City, MO 2019 - City Study (20)

Kansas_City_slide_deck_FINAL.pdf
Kansas_City_slide_deck_FINAL.pdfKansas_City_slide_deck_FINAL.pdf
Kansas_City_slide_deck_FINAL.pdf
 
Camden, NJ
Camden, NJCamden, NJ
Camden, NJ
 
San Antonio, TX - 2022 Charter School Study by CREDO
San Antonio, TX - 2022 Charter School Study by CREDOSan Antonio, TX - 2022 Charter School Study by CREDO
San Antonio, TX - 2022 Charter School Study by CREDO
 
2022 Austin Chart School City Study
2022 Austin Chart School City Study2022 Austin Chart School City Study
2022 Austin Chart School City Study
 
Washington DC. City Study 2022
Washington DC. City Study 2022Washington DC. City Study 2022
Washington DC. City Study 2022
 
Indianapolis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220601.pdf
Indianapolis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220601.pdfIndianapolis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220601.pdf
Indianapolis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220601.pdf
 
2022 Houston Chart School City Study
2022 Houston Chart School City Study2022 Houston Chart School City Study
2022 Houston Chart School City Study
 
New Orleans
New OrleansNew Orleans
New Orleans
 
batonrouge_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdf
batonrouge_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdfbatonrouge_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdf
batonrouge_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdf
 
memphis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdf
memphis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdfmemphis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdf
memphis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdf
 
DC_slide_deck_FINAL (1).pdf
DC_slide_deck_FINAL (1).pdfDC_slide_deck_FINAL (1).pdf
DC_slide_deck_FINAL (1).pdf
 
Denver, CO 2022 - City Study
Denver, CO 2022 - City StudyDenver, CO 2022 - City Study
Denver, CO 2022 - City Study
 
St_Louis_slide_deck_FINAL.pdf
St_Louis_slide_deck_FINAL.pdfSt_Louis_slide_deck_FINAL.pdf
St_Louis_slide_deck_FINAL.pdf
 
2022 Newark Chart School City Study
2022 Newark Chart School City Study2022 Newark Chart School City Study
2022 Newark Chart School City Study
 
TEA Data Presentation - Group 1
TEA Data Presentation - Group 1TEA Data Presentation - Group 1
TEA Data Presentation - Group 1
 
A First Look at Trends and Bright Spots in St. Louis School Performance Post...
A First Look at Trends and Bright Spots in St. Louis School Performance  Post...A First Look at Trends and Bright Spots in St. Louis School Performance  Post...
A First Look at Trends and Bright Spots in St. Louis School Performance Post...
 
2022 Fort Worth Charter School City Study
2022 Fort Worth Charter School City Study2022 Fort Worth Charter School City Study
2022 Fort Worth Charter School City Study
 
Child in America
Child in AmericaChild in America
Child in America
 
about data.pdf
about data.pdfabout data.pdf
about data.pdf
 
Westfall in the News- Report card rating
Westfall in the News- Report card ratingWestfall in the News- Report card rating
Westfall in the News- Report card rating
 

Recently uploaded

Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxStudents, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
EduSkills OECD
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
JosvitaDsouza2
 
Introduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Introduction to Quality Improvement EssentialsIntroduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Introduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Excellence Foundation for South Sudan
 
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free downloadThe French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
Vivekanand Anglo Vedic Academy
 
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdfESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
Fundacja Rozwoju Społeczeństwa Przedsiębiorczego
 
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
Celine George
 
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfThe Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
kaushalkr1407
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
DeeptiGupta154
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
MysoreMuleSoftMeetup
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
siemaillard
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Balvir Singh
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Anna Sz.
 
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxInstructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Jheel Barad
 
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
Sandy Millin
 
Fish and Chips - have they had their chips
Fish and Chips - have they had their chipsFish and Chips - have they had their chips
Fish and Chips - have they had their chips
GeoBlogs
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
EverAndrsGuerraGuerr
 
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleHow to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
Celine George
 
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and ResearchDigital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Vikramjit Singh
 
PART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
PART A. Introduction to Costumer ServicePART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
PART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
PedroFerreira53928
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
Delapenabediema
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxStudents, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
 
Introduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Introduction to Quality Improvement EssentialsIntroduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Introduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
 
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free downloadThe French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
 
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdfESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
 
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
 
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfThe Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
 
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxInstructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
 
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
 
Fish and Chips - have they had their chips
Fish and Chips - have they had their chipsFish and Chips - have they had their chips
Fish and Chips - have they had their chips
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
 
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleHow to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
 
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and ResearchDigital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
 
PART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
PART A. Introduction to Costumer ServicePART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
PART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
 

Kansas City, MO 2019 - City Study

  • 1. City Study 2019: Kansas City, Missouri
  • 2. Acknowledgement • Student-level data were provided by the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Note: The School Smart Kansas City assisted CREDO with verifying the list of public schools in Kansas City.
  • 3. This Report • This report on Kansas City, Missouri is one in a series of studies examining school performance across selected U.S. cities. • Performance is defined as how much academic growth students made from one year to the next. • The performance of students in Kansas City is benchmarked to the state average, accounting for student characteristics. • We first track the growth of Kansas City overall and by sector using data from 2013-14 to 2016-17. • We then further explore how one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017 differs by sector, school type, race, poverty status, English language learner (ELL) status, special education status, and gender.
  • 4. Types of Charters • CMO: Charter Management Organizations • To qualify as a CMO, an organization must oversee the operation of at least three charter schools. Further, the CMO must be the charter holder for all of the schools operated by the CMO. • EMO: Education Management Organizations • To qualify as an EMO, an organization must provide services under contract to at least three separate charter schools, but does not hold the charter for any school they serve. The EMO must answer to the school’s charter holder in addition to authorizers and state governance. • Independent Charter Schools • To qualify as an independent charter school, an organization must oversee the operation of a single charter school. The charter-holding organization may run the school directly or they may contract with an organization which provides services to one or two charter schools.
  • 5. Presentation of Results • The results display two sets of comparisons • The progress of Kansas City students is benchmarked against the state average learning gains, accounting for student characteristics. • Positive numbers represent better than average performance. • Negative numbers represent worse than average performance. • Significance in the difference between students in the city and the average state performance is represented by black asterisks. • The progress of charter school students within Kansas City is then compared to the performance of similar TPS students within Kansas City. • Significance in the difference between a student group in charter schools and the same student group in TPS is represented by colored asterisks.
  • 6. Measurement of Academic Growth • Results are graphically displayed on two axes: • The left axis indicates learning gains of Kansas City students relative to the average learning gains of students with similar characteristics in the state, measured in standard deviation units. • The right axis displays the same learning gains measured in days of learning. • The baseline of 0.00 represents 180 days of learning. • Positive performance translates to more days of learning. • Negative performance represents fewer days of learning. • The table below shows a transformation of standard deviation units to days of learning. Standard Deviations Days of Learning 0.05 30 0.10 59 0.15 89 0.20 118 0.25 148 0.30 177 0.35 207
  • 7. Roadmap for Graphs PRELIMINARY DRAFT 7 •Black Students •Hispanic Students Race •Poverty Status •English Language Learner Status •Special Education Status Subgroup •Female Students •Male Students Gender Overall Kansas City Results All Students Breakout by Further Breakout by This menu includes links to specific analyses throughout the report. In the following slides, the same menu is shown on the right-hand side. •Charter Network •School-Level Sector Comparison of Peers
  • 8. Kansas City Analysis: All Students Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Average One-Year Learning Gains for All Kansas City Students Compared to the State Average Learning Gains, by Year and Subject Overall Kansas City The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in the Spring of each school year (SY). 0.00 0.04 0.05 0.00 0.02 0.02 -89 -59 -30 0 30 59 89 118 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 SY 2014-2015 SY 2015-2016 SY 2016-2017 Growth (in Days of Learning) Growth (in Standard Deviations) * Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01 ELA Math
  • 9. Sector Analysis Sector Analysis (Math) Sector Analysis (ELA) Click the buttons below for English Language Arts (ELA) and math growth of Kansas City schools relative to the state average learning gains by year and sector. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City
  • 10. Sector Analysis: ELA Learning Gains in ELA for Students in Kansas City Charter Schools, Kansas City Magnet (Signature) Schools and Kansas City Non-Magnet TPS Compared to the State Average Learning Gains by Year The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in the Spring of each school year (SY). Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City [C] 0.05 [C] 0.11** [C] 0.09** [T] -0.10** [T] -0.08 [T] -0.03 [M]0.09 [M]0.09 [M]0.13* -89 -59 -30 0 30 59 89 118 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 SY 2014-2015 SY 2015-2016 SY 2016-2017 Growth (in Days of Learning) Growth (in Standard Deviations) * Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01 Charter TPS Magnet (Signature) * * * * * *
  • 11. Sector Analysis: Math The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in the Spring of each school year (SY). Learning Gains in Math for Students in Kansas City Charter Schools, Kansas City Magnet (Signature) Schools and Kansas City Non-Magnet TPS Compared to the State Average Learning Gains by Year Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City [C] 0.06 [C] 0.10 [C] 0.07 [T] -0.09* [T] -0.07 [T] -0.06 [M]0.03 [M]-0.02 [M]0.05 -89 -59 -30 0 30 59 89 118 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 SY 2014-2015 SY 2015-2016 SY 2016-2017 Growth (in Days of Learning) Growth (in Standard Deviations) * Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01 Charter TPS Magnet (Signature) * *
  • 12. Charter Network Analysis Learning Gains for Students in Kansas City Network-Affiliated Charter Schools and Independent Kansas City Charter Schools Compared to the State Average Learning Gains, by Subject The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City -0.04 0.07* 0.11** -0.16* -0.02 0.11 -118 -89 -59 -30 0 30 59 89 -0.20 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 Kansas City CMO Kansas City EMO Kansas City Independent Charter Growth (in Days of Learning) Growth (in Standard Deviations) * Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01 ELA Math *
  • 13. School-Level Performance by Sector Click the buttons below for ELA and math growth of individual Kansas City schools relative to the state average by sector. The upper cluster of dots shows where individual charter schools lie on spectrum of growth, and the lower cluster shows that of individual TPS. School Growth (Math) School Growth (ELA) Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City
  • 14. School Growth by Sector - ELA Distribution of ELA Learning Gains of Individual Kansas City Schools Compared to the State Average Learning Gains The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Growth (in Standard Deviations) Charter TPS Overall Kansas City
  • 15. School Growth by Sector - Math Distribution of Math Learning Gains of Individual Kansas City Schools Compared to the State Average Learning Gains The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Growth (in Standard Deviations) Charter TPS Overall Kansas City
  • 16. Race Analysis Hispanic Students Black Students Click the buttons below for graphs showing the performance of Black students in Kansas City or Hispanic students in Kansas City relative to the statewide average learning gains for students of the same race. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City
  • 17. Race Analysis: Black Students Learning Gains for All Kansas City Black Students Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Black Students Statewide, by Subject Black Students by Sector The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of Black students in the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City 0.06 0.03 -118 -89 -59 -30 0 30 59 89 -0.20 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 Growth (in Days of Learning) Growth (in Standard Deviations) * Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01 ELA Math
  • 18. Race Analysis: Black Students by Sector Learning Gains for Black Charter School Students and Black TPS Students in Kansas City Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Black Students Statewide, by Subject The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of Black students in the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City 0.11** 0.00 0.09 -0.05 -89 -59 -30 0 30 59 89 118 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 Kansas City Charter Black Students Kansas City TPS Black Students Growth (in Days of Learning) Growth (in Standard Deviations) * Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01 ELA Math *
  • 19. Race Analysis: Hispanic Students Learning Gains for All Kansas City Hispanic Students Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Hispanic Students Statewide, by Subject Hispanic Students by Sector The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of Hispanic students in the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City 0.02 0.01 -118 -89 -59 -30 0 30 59 89 -0.20 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 Growth (in Days of Learning) Growth (in Standard Deviations) * Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01 ELA Math
  • 20. Race Analysis: Hispanic Students by Sector Learning Gains for Hispanic Charter School Students and Hispanic TPS Students in Kansas City Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Hispanic Students Statewide, by Subject The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of Hispanic students in the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City 0.03 0.00 0.04 -0.01 -118 -89 -59 -30 0 30 59 89 -0.20 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 Kansas City Charter Hispanic Students Kansas City TPS Hispanic Students Growth (in Days of Learning) Growth (in Standard Deviations) * Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01 ELA Math
  • 21. Subgroup Analyses English Language Learner (ELL) Status Poverty Status Special Education Status Click the buttons below for graphs showing the performance of Kansas City students in poverty, Kansas City students with English Language Learner designation, or Kansas City students receiving special education services relative to average learning gains of students of the same subgroup statewide. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City
  • 22. Subgroup Analyses: Poverty Status Analysis Learning Gains for All Kansas City Students in Poverty Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Students in Poverty Statewide, by Subject Poverty Status by Sector The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of students in poverty in the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City 0.05 0.02 -89 -59 -30 0 30 59 89 118 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 Growth (in Days of Learning) Growth (in Standard Deviations) * Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01 ELA Math
  • 23. Subgroup Analyses: Poverty Status by Sector Learning Gains for Kansas City Charter School Students in Poverty and Kansas City TPS Students in Poverty Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Students in Poverty Statewide, by Subject The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of students in poverty in the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City 0.09** 0.01 0.07 -0.03 -89 -59 -30 0 30 59 89 118 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 Kansas City Charter Students in Poverty Kansas City TPS Students in Poverty Growth (in Days of Learning) Growth (in Standard Deviations) * Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01 ELA Math
  • 24. Subgroup Analyses: English Language Learner Status Analysis Learning Gains for All ELL Students in Kansas City Compared to the Average Learning Gains of ELL Students Statewide, by Subject ELL Status by Sector The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of ELL students in the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City 0.01 -0.02 -118 -89 -59 -30 0 30 59 89 -0.20 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 Growth (in Days of Learning) Growth (in Standard Deviations) * Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01 ELA Math
  • 25. Subgroup Analyses: English Language Learner Status by Sector Learning Gains for ELL Students in Kansas City Charter Schools and ELL Students in Kansas City TPS Compared to the Average Learning Gains of ELL Students Statewide, by Subject The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of ELL students in the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City 0.03 0.00 0.02 -0.05 -118 -89 -59 -30 0 30 59 89 -0.20 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 ELL Students in Kansas City Charter Schools ELL Students in Kansas City TPS Growth (in Days of Learning) Growth (in Standard Deviations) * Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01 ELA Math
  • 26. Subgroup Analyses: Special Education Status Analysis Learning Gains for All Kansas City Students in Special Education Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Students in Special Education Statewide, by Subject Special Ed. by Sector The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of students in Special Ed. in the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City 0.02 -0.05 -148 -118 -89 -59 -30 0 30 59 89 118 -0.25 -0.20 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 Growth (in Days of Learning) Growth (in Standard Deviations) * Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01 ELA Math
  • 27. Subgroup Analyses: Special Education Status by Sector Learning Gains for Kansas City Charter School Students in Special Ed. and Kansas City TPS Students in Special Ed. Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Students in Special Ed. Statewide, by Subject The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of students in Special Ed. in the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City 0.18** -0.09 0.07 -0.13* -118 -89 -59 -30 0 30 59 89 118 148 -0.20 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 Kansas City Charter Students in Special Ed. Kansas City TPS Students in Special Ed. Growth (in Days of Learning) Growth (in Standard Deviations) * Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01 ELA Math * *
  • 28. Gender Analysis Male Students Female Students Click the buttons below for graphs showing the performance of female students in Kansas City or male students in Kansas City relative to statewide average learning gains for the same gender. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City
  • 29. Gender Analysis: Female Students Learning Gains for All Kansas City Female Students Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Female Students Statewide, by Subject Female Students by Sector The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of female students in the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City 0.05 0.04 -89 -59 -30 0 30 59 89 118 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 Growth (in Days of Learning) Growth (in Standard Deviations) * Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01 ELA Math
  • 30. Gender Analysis: Female Students by Sector Learning Gains for Female Charter School Students and Female TPS Students in Kansas City Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Female Students Statewide, by Subject The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of female students in the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City 0.08* 0.02 0.10 -0.02 -89 -59 -30 0 30 59 89 118 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 Kansas City Charter Female Students Kansas City TPS Female Students Growth (in Days of Learning) Growth (in Standard Deviations) * Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01 ELA Math
  • 31. Gender Analysis: Male Students Learning Gains for All Kansas City Male Students Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Male Students Statewide, by Subject Male Students by Sector The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of male students in the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City 0.05* 0.00 -89 -59 -30 0 30 59 89 118 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 Growth (in Days of Learning) Growth (in Standard Deviations) * Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01 ELA Math
  • 32. Gender Analysis: Male Students by Sector Learning Gains for Male Charter School Students and Male TPS Students in Kansas City compared to the Average Learning Gains of Male Students Statewide, by Subject The 0.00 line represents the average learning gains of male students in the entire state. These results capture one-year academic growth for the period ending in Spring 2017. Sector Analysis Race Analysis Subgroup Analysis Roadmap for Graphs Gender Analysis • Charter Network • School-Level • Black Students • Hispanic Students • Poverty Status • ELL Status • Special Ed. Status • Female Students • Male Students Overall Kansas City 0.09** 0.01 0.05 -0.04 -89 -59 -30 0 30 59 89 118 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 Kansas City Charter Male Students Kansas City TPS Male Students Growth (in Days of Learning) Growth (in Standard Deviations) * Significant at p < 0.05 ** Significant at p < 0.01 ELA Math
  • 33. Summary of Findings The summary of the findings from the analysis of Kansas City schools is presented here.