These speaking points by Jean-Yves Art - Microsoft cover a presentation made during a roundtable discussion on Jurisdictional nexus in merger control regimes held at the 123rd meeting of the Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 15 June 2014. More papers, presentations and contributions from delegations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/jurisdictional-nexus-in-merger-control-regimes.htm
This presentation by Randoph Tritell - US FTC was made during a roundtable discussion on Jurisdictional nexus in merger control regimes held at the 123rd meeting of the Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 15 June 2014. More papers, presentations and contributions from delegations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/jurisdictional-nexus-in-merger-control-regimes.htm
This presentation by Bruce LYONS, Professor of Economics and Deputy Director of the ESRC Centre for Policy, University of East Anglia was made during the roundtable discussion on geographic market definition held during the 124th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 28 November 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/geographic-market-definition.htm
This presentation by John Davies Freshfields was made during a roundtable discussion on Public interest considerations in merger control held at the 123rd meeting of the Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 14 June 2014. More papers, presentations and contributions from delegations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/public-interest-considerations-in-merger-control.htm
This presentation by Paul Crampton, Chief Justice of the Canadian Federal Court and Member of the Competition Tribunal, was made during the discussion “Judicial perspectives on competition law” held at the 16th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/jpcl.
This presentation by Patricia Bascunana-Ambros, OECD Competition Division, was made during the discussion “Barriers to exit” held at the 132nd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 4 December 2019. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/bte.
This presentation by India was prepared for the break-out Session 1, “Surveys and other data gathering techniques”, in the discussion “Economic Analysis in Merger Investigations” at the 19th OECD Global Forum on Competition on 9 December 2020. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at http://oe.cd/eami.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by the OECD Competition Division was made during a roundtable discussion on Commitment Decisions in Antitrust Cases held at the 125th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 17 June 2014. More papers, presentations and contributions from delegations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/commitment-decisions-in-antitrust-cases.htm
This presentation by South Africa was made during the break-out Session 1, “Techniques and evidence for assessing market power” in the discussion “Economic analysis and evidence in abuse cases” held at the 20th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 7 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eac.
This presentation by Randoph Tritell - US FTC was made during a roundtable discussion on Jurisdictional nexus in merger control regimes held at the 123rd meeting of the Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 15 June 2014. More papers, presentations and contributions from delegations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/jurisdictional-nexus-in-merger-control-regimes.htm
This presentation by Bruce LYONS, Professor of Economics and Deputy Director of the ESRC Centre for Policy, University of East Anglia was made during the roundtable discussion on geographic market definition held during the 124th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 28 November 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/geographic-market-definition.htm
This presentation by John Davies Freshfields was made during a roundtable discussion on Public interest considerations in merger control held at the 123rd meeting of the Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 14 June 2014. More papers, presentations and contributions from delegations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/public-interest-considerations-in-merger-control.htm
This presentation by Paul Crampton, Chief Justice of the Canadian Federal Court and Member of the Competition Tribunal, was made during the discussion “Judicial perspectives on competition law” held at the 16th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/jpcl.
This presentation by Patricia Bascunana-Ambros, OECD Competition Division, was made during the discussion “Barriers to exit” held at the 132nd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 4 December 2019. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/bte.
This presentation by India was prepared for the break-out Session 1, “Surveys and other data gathering techniques”, in the discussion “Economic Analysis in Merger Investigations” at the 19th OECD Global Forum on Competition on 9 December 2020. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at http://oe.cd/eami.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by the OECD Competition Division was made during a roundtable discussion on Commitment Decisions in Antitrust Cases held at the 125th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 17 June 2014. More papers, presentations and contributions from delegations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/commitment-decisions-in-antitrust-cases.htm
This presentation by South Africa was made during the break-out Session 1, “Techniques and evidence for assessing market power” in the discussion “Economic analysis and evidence in abuse cases” held at the 20th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 7 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eac.
This presentation by Enrique VERGARA (President of the Competition Tribunal of Chile) was made during the discussion “Judicial perspectives on competition law” held at the 16th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/jpcl.
This presentation by Donghwan SHON ( Presiding Judge of Goyang district court of Korea) was made during the discussion “Judicial perspectives on competition law” held at the 16th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/jpcl.
This presentation by the World Bank was made during Break-out Session 3: Creating Legitimacy in the framework of the discussion on “Overcoming adversity and attaining success: Small and developing competition agencies” held at the 16th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/sda.
This presentation by Johannes Erlandsson from the Swedish Competition Authority was made during the discussion “Safe harbours and legal presumptions in competition law” held at the 128th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 5 December 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/21v.
This presentation by Matthew Johnson, Partner OXERA, was made during the discussion “Barriers to exit” held at the 132nd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 4 December 2019. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/bte.
This presentation by CUTS’ SG Pradeep S Mehta was made during Break-out Session 2: Enforcement in the framework of the discussion on “Overcoming adversity and attaining success: Small and developing competition agencies” held at the 16th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/sda.
This presentation by BIAC was made during a roundtable discussion on Jurisdictional nexus in merger control regimes held at the 123rd meeting of the Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 15 June 2014. More papers, presentations and contributions from delegations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/jurisdictional-nexus-in-merger-control-regimes.htm
This presentation by Jose Luis Buendía, Partner, Garrigues, was made during the discussion “The promotion of competitive neutrality by competition authorities” held at the 20th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/pcnca.
This presentation by the OECD Competition Division was made during a roundtable discussion on Jurisdictional nexus in merger control regimes held at the 123rd meeting of the Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 15 June 2014. More papers, presentations and contributions from delegations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/jurisdictional-nexus-in-merger-control-regimes.htm
This presentation by Fiji was made during the break-out Session 3, “Techniques and evidence for assessing predatory pricing, margin squeeze and exploitative abuses” in the discussion “Economic analysis and evidence in abuse cases” held at the 20th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 7 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eac.
This presentation by Sean Ennis, Senior Economist, OECD Competition Division, was made during the discussion on " Cartels: The estimation of harm in public enforcement actions " held at the 2017 Latin American and Caribbean Competition Forum (4-5 April 2017 – Managua, Nicaragua). More papers and presentations can be found at oe.cd/laccf.
This presentation by Damien GERADIN, Founding partner, Edge Legal Thinking was made during the discussion on "Price discrimination" held during the 126th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 30 November 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/price-discrimination.htm
These slides by the OECD Competition Division introduce the OECD background note presented during the discussion on "Price discrimination" held during the 126th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 30 November 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/price-discrimination.htm
This presentation by Claudio Calcagno, Director, GMT Economics, was made during the discussion “Economic analysis and evidence in abuse cases” held at the 20th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 7 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eac.
This presentation by the OECD Competition Division was made during a roundtable discussion on Public interest considerations in merger control held at the 123rd meeting of the Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 14 June 2014. More papers, presentations and contributions from delegations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/public-interest-considerations-in-merger-control.htm
This presentation by Miguel de la Mano, Executive Vice President at Compass Lexicon, was made during the Workshop on market studies selection and prioritisation of sectors and industries held on 9 March 2017 at the OECD Headquarters. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/market-studies-workshop-on-selection-prioritisation-of-sectors-industries.htm
This presentation by Pinar Akman, Professor of Competition Law & Director of Centre for Business Law and Practice, University of Leeds, was made during the discussion “How can competition contribute to fairer societies?”, held during the 17th OECD Global Forum on Competition on 29 November 2018. More documents and presentations on this topic can be found at oe.cd/cfs.
This presentation by Albania was made during the break-out Session 3, “Techniques and evidence for assessing predatory pricing, margin squeeze and exploitative abuses” in the discussion “Economic analysis and evidence in abuse cases” held at the 20th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 7 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eac.
Sangyun Lee, ‘Abuse of Economic Dependence in Competition Law From a Comparat...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides prepared for the 2021 ASOCLA Asia regional session. I sincerely thank the seminar participants for their comments on my research. Special thanks go to Prof. Thomas K. Cheng and Prof. Masako Wakui, for organizing this seminar and giving me an invaluable opportunity to share my research findings and further develop and elaborate ideas. Please note that this research, as part of my Ph.D. research, is still in progress and has yet reached any definitive conclusion. When you want to use any contents included in this document, please reference this document with citation as follows: Sangyun Lee, ‘Abuse of Economic Dependence in Competition Law From a Comparative Perspective’ (ASCOLA Asia Regional Workshop 2022, Jan 5, 2022). Any comments, of course, are more than welcome and much appreciated. sangyunl@korea.ac.kr
This presentation by Eleanor M. Fox, Walter J. Derenberg Professor of Trade Regulation, New York University School of Law, was made during the discussion “The promotion of competitive neutrality by competition authorities” held at the 20th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/pcnca.
This presentation by Paula RIEDEL, Partner at Kirkland & Ellis International LLP was made during the roundtable discussion on agency decision-making in merger cases: from a prohibition decision to a conditional clearance held during the 124th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 29 November 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/agency-decision-making-in-merger-cases.htm
This presentation by Simon VANDE WALLE (Case handler at the European Commission) was made during the roundtable discussion on agency decision-making in merger cases: from a prohibition decision to a conditional clearance held during the 124th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 29 November 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/agency-decision-making-in-merger-cases.htm
This presentation by Enrique VERGARA (President of the Competition Tribunal of Chile) was made during the discussion “Judicial perspectives on competition law” held at the 16th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/jpcl.
This presentation by Donghwan SHON ( Presiding Judge of Goyang district court of Korea) was made during the discussion “Judicial perspectives on competition law” held at the 16th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/jpcl.
This presentation by the World Bank was made during Break-out Session 3: Creating Legitimacy in the framework of the discussion on “Overcoming adversity and attaining success: Small and developing competition agencies” held at the 16th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/sda.
This presentation by Johannes Erlandsson from the Swedish Competition Authority was made during the discussion “Safe harbours and legal presumptions in competition law” held at the 128th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 5 December 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/21v.
This presentation by Matthew Johnson, Partner OXERA, was made during the discussion “Barriers to exit” held at the 132nd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 4 December 2019. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/bte.
This presentation by CUTS’ SG Pradeep S Mehta was made during Break-out Session 2: Enforcement in the framework of the discussion on “Overcoming adversity and attaining success: Small and developing competition agencies” held at the 16th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/sda.
This presentation by BIAC was made during a roundtable discussion on Jurisdictional nexus in merger control regimes held at the 123rd meeting of the Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 15 June 2014. More papers, presentations and contributions from delegations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/jurisdictional-nexus-in-merger-control-regimes.htm
This presentation by Jose Luis Buendía, Partner, Garrigues, was made during the discussion “The promotion of competitive neutrality by competition authorities” held at the 20th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/pcnca.
This presentation by the OECD Competition Division was made during a roundtable discussion on Jurisdictional nexus in merger control regimes held at the 123rd meeting of the Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 15 June 2014. More papers, presentations and contributions from delegations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/jurisdictional-nexus-in-merger-control-regimes.htm
This presentation by Fiji was made during the break-out Session 3, “Techniques and evidence for assessing predatory pricing, margin squeeze and exploitative abuses” in the discussion “Economic analysis and evidence in abuse cases” held at the 20th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 7 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eac.
This presentation by Sean Ennis, Senior Economist, OECD Competition Division, was made during the discussion on " Cartels: The estimation of harm in public enforcement actions " held at the 2017 Latin American and Caribbean Competition Forum (4-5 April 2017 – Managua, Nicaragua). More papers and presentations can be found at oe.cd/laccf.
This presentation by Damien GERADIN, Founding partner, Edge Legal Thinking was made during the discussion on "Price discrimination" held during the 126th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 30 November 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/price-discrimination.htm
These slides by the OECD Competition Division introduce the OECD background note presented during the discussion on "Price discrimination" held during the 126th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 30 November 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/price-discrimination.htm
This presentation by Claudio Calcagno, Director, GMT Economics, was made during the discussion “Economic analysis and evidence in abuse cases” held at the 20th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 7 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eac.
This presentation by the OECD Competition Division was made during a roundtable discussion on Public interest considerations in merger control held at the 123rd meeting of the Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 14 June 2014. More papers, presentations and contributions from delegations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/public-interest-considerations-in-merger-control.htm
This presentation by Miguel de la Mano, Executive Vice President at Compass Lexicon, was made during the Workshop on market studies selection and prioritisation of sectors and industries held on 9 March 2017 at the OECD Headquarters. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/market-studies-workshop-on-selection-prioritisation-of-sectors-industries.htm
This presentation by Pinar Akman, Professor of Competition Law & Director of Centre for Business Law and Practice, University of Leeds, was made during the discussion “How can competition contribute to fairer societies?”, held during the 17th OECD Global Forum on Competition on 29 November 2018. More documents and presentations on this topic can be found at oe.cd/cfs.
This presentation by Albania was made during the break-out Session 3, “Techniques and evidence for assessing predatory pricing, margin squeeze and exploitative abuses” in the discussion “Economic analysis and evidence in abuse cases” held at the 20th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 7 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eac.
Sangyun Lee, ‘Abuse of Economic Dependence in Competition Law From a Comparat...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides prepared for the 2021 ASOCLA Asia regional session. I sincerely thank the seminar participants for their comments on my research. Special thanks go to Prof. Thomas K. Cheng and Prof. Masako Wakui, for organizing this seminar and giving me an invaluable opportunity to share my research findings and further develop and elaborate ideas. Please note that this research, as part of my Ph.D. research, is still in progress and has yet reached any definitive conclusion. When you want to use any contents included in this document, please reference this document with citation as follows: Sangyun Lee, ‘Abuse of Economic Dependence in Competition Law From a Comparative Perspective’ (ASCOLA Asia Regional Workshop 2022, Jan 5, 2022). Any comments, of course, are more than welcome and much appreciated. sangyunl@korea.ac.kr
This presentation by Eleanor M. Fox, Walter J. Derenberg Professor of Trade Regulation, New York University School of Law, was made during the discussion “The promotion of competitive neutrality by competition authorities” held at the 20th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/pcnca.
This presentation by Paula RIEDEL, Partner at Kirkland & Ellis International LLP was made during the roundtable discussion on agency decision-making in merger cases: from a prohibition decision to a conditional clearance held during the 124th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 29 November 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/agency-decision-making-in-merger-cases.htm
This presentation by Simon VANDE WALLE (Case handler at the European Commission) was made during the roundtable discussion on agency decision-making in merger cases: from a prohibition decision to a conditional clearance held during the 124th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 29 November 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/agency-decision-making-in-merger-cases.htm
This presentation by the OECD Competition Division was made during the roundtable discussion on geographic market definition held during the 124th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 28 November 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/geographic-market-definition.htm
This presentation by Jorge PADILLA, Senior Managing Director and Head of Compass Lexecon was made during the roundtable discussion on geographic market definition held during the 124th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 28 November 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/geographic-market-definition.htm
This presentation by Prof. Caron BEATON-WELLS from the University of Melbourn, Australia was made during the discussion on "Sanctions in Anti-trust cases" held at the 15th Global Forum on Competition on 2 December 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/competition/globalforum/competition-and-sanctions-in-antitrust-cases.htm
This presentation by Prof. John M. Connor from Purdue University, West Lafayette, US was made during the discussion on "Sanctions in Anti-trust cases" held at the 15th Global Forum on Competition on 2 December 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/competition/globalforum/competition-and-sanctions-in-antitrust-cases.htm
This presentation by the OECD Competition Division was made during the discussion on "Sanctions in Anti-trust cases" held at the 15th Global Forum on Competition on 2 December 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/competition/globalforum/competition-and-sanctions-in-antitrust-cases.htm
This presentation by Prof. Hwang LEE from the Korean University School of Law was made during the discussion on "Sanctions in Anti-trust cases" held at the 15th Global Forum on Competition on 2 December 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/competition/globalforum/competition-and-sanctions-in-antitrust-cases.htm
This presentation by Norwegian Competition Authority was made during the discussion on "Independence of competition authorities - from designs to practices" held at the 15th Global Forum on Competition on 1 December 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/competition/globalforum/independence-of-competition-authorities.htm
This presentation by Prof. Allan Fels from the University of Melbourn, Australia was made during the discussion on "Independence of competition authorities - from designs to practices" held at the 15th Global Forum on Competition on 1 December 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/competition/globalforum/independence-of-competition-authorities.htm
This presentation by the UK Financial Conduct Authority was made during the discussion on "Price discrimination" held during the 126th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 30 November 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/price-discrimination.htm
This presentation by the Chile's Tribunal de Defensa de la Libre Competencia was made during the discussion on "Price discrimination" held during the 126th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 30 November 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/price-discrimination.htm
This presentation by Dennis CARLTON, Professor of Economics, University of Chicago Booth School of Business was made during the discussion on "Price discrimination" held during the 126th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 30 November 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/price-discrimination.htm
This presentation by the Iceland Competition Authority was made during the discussion on "Price discrimination" held during the 126th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 30 November 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/price-discrimination.htm
This presentation by the OECD Competition Division was made during the discussion on "Independence of competition authorities - from designs to practices" held at the 15th Global Forum on Competition on 1 December 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/competition/globalforum/independence-of-competition-authorities.htm
This presentation by Joseph Farrell- University of California, Berkeley, was made during a roundtable discussion on Fidelity Rebates held at the 125th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 16 June 2014. More papers, presentations and contributions from delegations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/fidelity-rebates.htm
This presentation by James S. Venit - Skadden Arps, was made during a roundtable discussion on Fidelity Rebates held at the 125th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 16 June 2014. More papers, presentations and contributions from delegations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/fidelity-rebates.htm
This presentation by Alison Jones - King's College London, was made during a roundtable discussion on Fidelity Rebates held at the 125th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 16 June 2014. More papers, presentations and contributions from delegations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/fidelity-rebates.htm
This presentation by the OECD Competition Division was made during a roundtable discussion on Fidelity Rebates held at the 125th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 16 June 2014. More papers, presentations and contributions from delegations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/fidelity-rebates.htm
OBJECTIVE
OECD Inclusive Framework released a public consultation document on matters where its members seek input from stakeholders in conducting this 2020 review. This webinar shall touch upon the issues relating to implementation, scope and content of CbC Reporting set out in the document for public consultation.
Tax management within multinational enterprises (MNEs) has never been more challenging. 'Getting to grips with the BEPS Action Plan' is the latest Grant Thornton report exploring the OECD’s planned overhaul of the international tax system, what it means for businesses and how they can prepare.
Anatomy of Intangible Transfer Pricing Scheme, With A Focus on Corporate Rest...taxguru5
"Amidst the OECD's inclusionary efforts, many issues remain unresolved, particularly when it comes to the transfer of intangibles for the specific purpose of bus"
TaxGuru is a platform that provides Updates On Amendments in Income Tax, Wealth Tax, Company Law, Service Tax, RBI, Custom Duty, Corporate Law , Goods and Service Tax etc.
To know more visit https://taxguru.in/income-tax/anatomy-intangible-transfer-pricing-scheme-focus-corporate-restructurings.html
Anatomy of Intangible Transfer Pricing Scheme, With A Focus on Corporate Rest...taxguru5
"Amidst the OECD's inclusionary efforts, many issues remain unresolved, particularly when it comes to the transfer of intangibles for the specific purpose of bus"
TaxGuru is a platform that provides Updates On Amendments in Income Tax, Wealth Tax, Company Law, Service Tax, RBI, Custom Duty, Corporate Law , Goods and Service Tax etc.
To know more visit https://taxguru.in/income-tax/anatomy-intangible-transfer-pricing-scheme-focus-corporate-restructurings.html
Transfer Pricing Forum: Transfer Pricing for the International Practitioner, ...Matheson Law Firm
Joe Duffy, Partner in the Tax Group, and Kathryn Stapleton, Solicitor in the Tax Department, co-wrote the Ireland section for Transfer Pricing Forum: Transfer Pricing for the International Practitioner, September 2016.
BEPS: Action #1 - Addressing the tax challenges of the digital economyAlex Baulf
No new taxes or recommendations unique to the digital economy were suggested by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) but the door is still open for unilateral safeguard actions.
Country-by-Country Reporting proposal - Working Breakfast 28 June 2016FERMA
On 28 June 2016, MEP Jeppe Kofod hosted a working breakfast meeting today at the European Parliament about the proposal published on 12 April 2016 by the European Commission to extend country-by-country financial reporting to most multinational groups operating in the EU.
The European Confederation of Institutes of Internal Auditing (ECIIA) and FERMA stated that Internal auditors and risk managers have a key role to play in ensuring that future financial transparency standards are well understood, embedded into the strategy of large corporations and become a source of competitive advantage.
Companies are facing a proliferation of transfer pricing documentation demands. While the new requirements set out in the OECD’s Base Erosion Profit Shifting (BEPS) Action Plan will raise the bar still further, they could also provide the catalyst for the development of a more sustainable approach. http://bit.ly/1htg32Z
Oecd's recommendation to address tax challenges of digital economyDVSResearchFoundatio
OBJECTIVE
On 31 January 2020, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) released a Statement by the Inclusive Framework on BEPS on the Two-Pillar Approach to Address the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalization of the Economy. The webinar shall discuss the architecture of Pillar One which deals with the new taxing right, as a basis for negotiation of a consensus-based solution and additionally, the progress on discussions for Pillar Two, which deals with ensuring minimum level of taxation
Professionals in the tax community are tasked with developing planning strategies under existing statutory schemes that minimize or eliminate their clients’ global tax burden. It is these planning structures that draw the attention of tax authorities as causing the “erosion” of taxable income bases and consequently, the tax revenues for their respective countries.
Share nl report for the ministry of economic affairs on the innovation in the...shareNL
This report summarises research on barriers to investment in innovation and whether opportunities are currently feasible or not in the collaborative economy, and in the area of green growth. For this purpose, multiple roundtable meetings have been organised and interviews have been held with entrepreneurs, academics, legal experts, representatives of companies and government, who are active in the field of the collaborative economy. This summary sets outs the priority aspects of the collaborative economy which require action.
The collaborative economy contributes to green growth, but its potential can be utilised better. This can be achieved by looking at the opportunities and barriers, which now exist because the difference between producers and consumers has become more blurred, as well as changing trends of consumers renting or sharing products rather than owning products. As a result new risks and questions arise concerning liability, taxation, and competition. This report suggests a role for the government in four areas: (1) to ensure that current legislation is clear in how it applies to the collaborative economy; (2) to provide regulatory flexibility for experiments; (3) to monitor relevant developments and safeguard the public interest; and (4) to address the barriers that have been identified in this research.
In partnership with the European Commission and World Bank Group, the Task Force on Tax and Development has developed a highly successful Transfer Pricing assistance programme in developing countries.
Disclosure of Transfer Pricing Policies: An Internal Prespectiveiosrjce
IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM) is a double blind peer reviewed International Journal that provides rapid publication (within a month) of articles in all areas of business and managemant and its applications. The journal welcomes publications of high quality papers on theoretical developments and practical applications inbusiness and management. Original research papers, state-of-the-art reviews, and high quality technical notes are invited for publications.
This presentation by Morris Kleiner (University of Minnesota), was made during the discussion “Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations” held at the Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation on 10 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/crps.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation comprises highlights from the publication OECD Competition Trends 2024 published in Paris on 6 March 2024 during the OECD Competition Open Day. The full publication can be accessed at oe.cd/comp-trends.
This presentation by Cristina Camacho, Head of Cabinet and Head of International Relations, Portuguese Competition Authority, was made during the discussion “Use of Economic Evidence in Cartel Cases” held at the 22nd meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/egci.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by William E. Kovacic, Global Competition Professor of Law and Policy and Director, Competition Law Center, The George Washington University, was made during the discussion “Ex-post Assessment of Merger Remedies” held at the 22nd meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eamr.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by John E. Kwoka, Neal F. Finnegan Distinguished Professor of Economics, Northeastern University, was made during the discussion “Ex-post Assessment of Merger Remedies” held at the 22nd meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eamr.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Amelia Fletcher CBE, Professor of Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, was made during the discussion “Ex-post Assessment of Merger Remedies” held at the 22nd meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eamr.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by the OECD Secretariat was made during the discussion “Ex-post Assessment of Merger Remedies” held at the 22nd meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eamr.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by John Davies, Member, UK Competition Appeal Tribunal, was made during the discussion “Use of Economic Evidence in Cartel Cases” held at the 22nd meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/egci.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Simon Roberts, Professor, Centre for Competition, Regulation and Economic Development, University of Johannesburg, was made during the discussion “Use of Economic Evidence in Cartel Cases” held at the 22nd meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/egci.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Serbia was made during the discussion “Alternatives to Leniency Programmes” held at the 22nd meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 7 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/atlp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Italy was made during the discussion “Alternatives to Leniency Programmes” held at the 22nd meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 7 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/atlp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Daniel CRANE, Richard W. Pogue Professor of Law, University of Michigan, was made during the discussion “Out-of-Market Efficiencies in Competition Enforcement” held at the 141st meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 6 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/omee.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by John DAVIES, Member, Competition Appeal Tribunal UK, was made during the discussion “Out-of-Market Efficiencies in Competition Enforcement” held at the 141st meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 6 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/omee.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Nancy ROSE, Head of the Department of Economics and Charles P. Kindleberger Professor of Applied Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), was made during the discussion “Out-of-Market Efficiencies in Competition Enforcement” held at the 141st meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 6 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/omee.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Nicole ROSENBOOM, Principal, Oxera Consulting LLP, was made during the discussion “Out-of-Market Efficiencies in Competition Enforcement” held at the 141st meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 6 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/omee.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Anna TZANAKI, Lecturer in Law, University of Leeds, was made during the discussion “Serial Acquisitions and Industry Roll-ups” held at the 141st meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 6 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/sair.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Sha'ista GOGA, Director, Acacia Economics, was made during the discussion “Serial Acquisitions and Industry Roll-ups” held at the 141st meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 6 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/sair.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Ioannis KOKKORIS, Chair in Competition Law and Economics and Director, Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary University of London, was made during the discussion “Serial Acquisitions and Industry Roll-ups” held at the 141st meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 6 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/sair.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by the OECD Secretariat was made during the discussion “Serial Acquisitions and Industry Roll-ups” held at the 141st meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 6 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/sair.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Simonetta VEZZOSO, Associate Professor, Economics Department, University of Trento, was made during the discussion “Competition and Innovation - The Role of Innovation in Enforcement Cases” held at the 141st meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 5 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/rbci.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
More from OECD Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs (20)
Acorn Recovery: Restore IT infra within minutesIP ServerOne
Introducing Acorn Recovery as a Service, a simple, fast, and secure managed disaster recovery (DRaaS) by IP ServerOne. A DR solution that helps restore your IT infra within minutes.
Have you ever wondered how search works while visiting an e-commerce site, internal website, or searching through other types of online resources? Look no further than this informative session on the ways that taxonomies help end-users navigate the internet! Hear from taxonomists and other information professionals who have first-hand experience creating and working with taxonomies that aid in navigation, search, and discovery across a range of disciplines.
This presentation, created by Syed Faiz ul Hassan, explores the profound influence of media on public perception and behavior. It delves into the evolution of media from oral traditions to modern digital and social media platforms. Key topics include the role of media in information propagation, socialization, crisis awareness, globalization, and education. The presentation also examines media influence through agenda setting, propaganda, and manipulative techniques used by advertisers and marketers. Furthermore, it highlights the impact of surveillance enabled by media technologies on personal behavior and preferences. Through this comprehensive overview, the presentation aims to shed light on how media shapes collective consciousness and public opinion.
0x01 - Newton's Third Law: Static vs. Dynamic AbusersOWASP Beja
f you offer a service on the web, odds are that someone will abuse it. Be it an API, a SaaS, a PaaS, or even a static website, someone somewhere will try to figure out a way to use it to their own needs. In this talk we'll compare measures that are effective against static attackers and how to battle a dynamic attacker who adapts to your counter-measures.
About the Speaker
===============
Diogo Sousa, Engineering Manager @ Canonical
An opinionated individual with an interest in cryptography and its intersection with secure software development.
Sharpen existing tools or get a new toolbox? Contemporary cluster initiatives...Orkestra
UIIN Conference, Madrid, 27-29 May 2024
James Wilson, Orkestra and Deusto Business School
Emily Wise, Lund University
Madeline Smith, The Glasgow School of Art
Announcement of 18th IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verif...
Jurisdictional nexus in merger control regimes- Speaking points by Jean-Yves Art - Microsoft - June 2016 OECD discussion
1. OECD COMPETITION COMMITTEE
Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement
All documentation related to this discussion can be found at:
http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/jurisdictional-nexus-in-merger-control-regimes.htm
ROUNDTABLE ON LOCAL NEXUS AND JURISDICTIONAL THRESHOLDS
IN MERGER CONTROL
15 June 2016
Speaking points by Jean-Yves Art
Microsoft
• The final paragraph of the Background Paper prepared by the Secretariat very rightfully
emphasizes the importance of the local nexus requirement in the light of the recent evolution of
international merger control, in particular the significant increase in the number of jurisdictions
with a compulsory merger review system.
• The local nexus criteria and local nexus thresholds are intended to identify - and submit to merger
control - those merger transactions that are likely to have a significant impact on competition in
the jurisdiction concerned. General principles of law, sound administrative practices and
enforcement effectiveness require that notification criteria and thresholds be clear, objective and
predictable.
• We believe that the local turnover of the companies concerned is a criterion that can achieve
those goals. Admittedly, the local turnover relates to the company’s weight in the economy (not
in any relevant competition market) but taking into account the above-mentioned requirements
of certainty, objectivity and predictability, it seems to be an appropriate proxy for the potential
impact of the merger transaction on competition in the jurisdiction concerned.
• The “local turnover” criterion calls for three main comments – all closely related to the goals of
the “local nexus” requirements.
• The first relates to the identification of the companies whose local turnover should be taken
into account. Since the objective is to filter merger transactions that are likely to have a
significant impact on competition, merger review should as a rule be triggered by at least each
of two participating undertakings (for instance, in the case of an asset sale, the acquirer and
the assets being acquired) meeting the relevant local turnover threshold. If the local turnover
of only one participating undertaking could trigger merger notification irrespective of whether
another participating undertaking has any activities in the jurisdiction concerned, a large
number of mergers that have no or insignificant effect on competition would be subject to
merger review, with all the downsides of over-inclusiveness in terms of poor allocation of
resources by companies and agencies. In the same vein, in those jurisdictions where merger
control applies to the creation and/or modification of joint ventures, merger control should
trigger only if the current or foreseeable turnover of the joint venture – not only that of its
parent companies – in the jurisdiction concerned exceeds the local turnover threshold. In our
experience, several jurisdictions require notification of joint venture transactions on the basis
of the local turnover of the parent companies, irrespective of whether the JV has (or plans to
have) any activity in the country concerned. With respect, we doubt whether this approach is
consistent with sound merger review policy.
2. All documentation related to this discussion can be found at:
http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/jurisdictional-nexus-in-merger-control-regimes.htm
• Our second comment about local turnover as the local nexus criterion relates to the turnover
threshold, that is, the turnover figure that triggers notification. As appears from the very
complete and useful Annex II to the Background Paper, the local turnover threshold set by the
laws of those jurisdictions which use that notification criterion varies significantly from one
jurisdiction to the other. That is not surprising in view of the difference in the size of the
economies concerned in GDP terms. However, turnover thresholds also vary significantly
relative to the size of these economies. Indeed, a quick look at the “turnover threshold to
GDP” ratio reveals major differences from one country to the other, with some of them being
very low compared to others. There may be no optimal “turnover threshold to GDP” ratio.
However, we believe that it is worth looking closely at that ratio across jurisdictions and
compare it to the ratio of notified concentrations raising competition concerns to the total
number of notified concentrations in the same jurisdictions. The data may provide some
interesting perspective on the issue of the appropriate turnover threshold.
• Our third comment about local turnover as the local nexus criterion concerns mergers that
involve companies with no or little turnover but a large value potential. For instance, the
Facebook / WhatsApp merger was valued at $19 billion although WhatsApp’s turnover
amounted to only $10 million worldwide in the preceding fiscal year. Due to that low
turnover, the transaction did not reach the EU notification threshold and it would not have
been subject to review at EU level, had it not been for some EU countries’ joint decision to
refer the matter to the European Commission. Such a situation is problematic in Europe and
also at a global scale because it means that mergers that have significant economic, and
perhaps competition, effects might not be subject to review at least in those countries that use
turnover as the notification criterion.
There are various ways to address this issue:
• One could be a residual criterion catching all merger transactions that have substantial,
direct and foreseeable effects on the local market. Instead of a limiting criterion – as it is
used in some countries such as Germany or Austria – this test would be used to broaden
the scope of national merger rules. To be implementable by parties, we believe that two
conditions should be fulfilled. Firstly, there should be clear and practical guidelines defining
parameters of substantial, direct and foreseeable effects from the agency concerned.
Secondly, the parties to the transaction should have an opportunity to engage in
meaningful pre-notification discussions with the agency concerned to ascertain whether
the proposed merger meets the “effects” test as applied by that agency.
• Another approach is to design specific “turnover” or “turnover-like” criteria. As explained
in Box 3 of the Background Paper, “it is (…) common for jurisdictions to have specific
turnover thresholds, or specific rules regarding their calculation, for companies active in
specific sectors such as banks, insurance or media.” To cover transactions such as Facebook
/ WhatsApp in which one or both companies achieve a low turnover, one could combine
two notification criteria based respectively on the value of the transaction and the number
of local customers served by the parties. The number of local customers may provide a
good understanding of the undertaking’s local footprint. Indeed, in some digital businesses,
market shares are based on the number of customers or some variation thereof such as
“reach,” “unique users” or “monthly active users.” Although an approach based on the
number of local customers supplied by the parties is not perfect (for instance, depending
on the precise metric the number of customers may not say much about the customers’
actual engagement), it would ensure that the transaction subject to merger control has a
sufficient local nexus, and would meet the requirements of clarity, objectivity and
predictability that are mentioned above. This criterion may not be appropriate in all
industries but it may be worth considering to address shortcomings of the revenue criterion
in some of them.