JUDICIAL PRECEDENT
• Is statement of Law found in a higher judicial decision,
followed by the same court or subordinate court.
• law‖ involves and be speaks of a uniformity. The judges
surely could hat have ignored the mores, the customs, usages
and habits of the people.
• In Common Law of England, precedents –to some extent,
based on the recognized, reasonable and time honored
customs and usages of the people.
• Precedent speaks with authority
• Principle becomes binding for future cases and it thus
becomes a source of law.
• An established rule to abide by the former precedents where
the same points come again in litigation.
• Authoritative precedents are a legal source of Law.
• Persuasive precedents are a historical source of law (not a
binding)
Two meanings
1. The strict sense – should be regarded as authoritative and
should be followed except in certain circumstance.
2. The loose sense – reported judgments of the law courts
meant to be cited, and that these judgments will probably
be followed by the judges.
• Carry some legal principles.
• Legal principles—ratio decidendi (question of Law)
• The ratio decidendi is the heart of a precedent.
• Is purely constitutive in nature and never abrogative.
• Create a Law but cannot alter it.
• Judges are not at liberty to put their own views.
• Judges can fill in the gaps and remove imperfections of the
existing laws.
Four types of precedents
1)Declaratory and original precedents
• Create law are original precedents
• Declaratory of existing laws are declaratory precedents.
2)Persuasive Precedents
• judges are under no obligation to follow
• But they must take into consideration.
• In India, the decision of one High Court are only persuasive
precedents in other High Courts. 19
3) Absolutely Authoritative precedents
• A precedent is said to be authoritative –the court to which cited is to
bound to follow it irrespective of the fact that the court doesn’t agree
with that decision.
• AAPs , binding character of the precedents are absolute
• In India, every court is absolutely bound by the decision of court
superior to itself.
4) Conditionally Authoritative Precedents
• Is one which though ordinarily binding on the court to which it is cited.
• Is liable to be disregarded in certain circumstances Doctrines of
Precedent in Tribunals of India
• If a Bench of the Tribunal wishes to take a view different from the one
taken by the earlier Bench,
• Propriety demands that it should place the matter before the president
of the Tribunal so that the case is referred to a larger bench
• The Supreme Court –1950
• Highest Court, the law declared by it is binding on all courts
of the country.—Article 141
• ―law declared‖ means not only the ratio decidendi of a
decision but it includes also obiter dictum.
• Ratio decidendi(reason of the decision) includes – a concrete
decision binding on the parties--- the concrete, practical
decision, the force of law. 24
• Obiter dicta
• Legal opinion on issues which they are not asked to decide.
• Ratio decidendi is the general principle of the case
• Obiter dicta is what the judge said unwantedly, just by the
way.
• OD—which does not have any binding authority 25
• Supreme Court is not bound by its own decisions
• All courts in Article 141---Other than the Supreme Court.
• Supreme Court observed that the Doctrine of Stare Decisis
is a very valuable principles of precedent
• If departed from it there are extraordinary or special reasons
to do so.
• In Constitution– does not place any restriction on our power
to review our earlier decision.
THANK YOU
By-DHARA SHARMA
LLM
Business Law.

Judical process

  • 1.
  • 2.
    • Is statementof Law found in a higher judicial decision, followed by the same court or subordinate court. • law‖ involves and be speaks of a uniformity. The judges surely could hat have ignored the mores, the customs, usages and habits of the people. • In Common Law of England, precedents –to some extent, based on the recognized, reasonable and time honored customs and usages of the people.
  • 3.
    • Precedent speakswith authority • Principle becomes binding for future cases and it thus becomes a source of law. • An established rule to abide by the former precedents where the same points come again in litigation. • Authoritative precedents are a legal source of Law. • Persuasive precedents are a historical source of law (not a binding)
  • 4.
    Two meanings 1. Thestrict sense – should be regarded as authoritative and should be followed except in certain circumstance. 2. The loose sense – reported judgments of the law courts meant to be cited, and that these judgments will probably be followed by the judges. • Carry some legal principles. • Legal principles—ratio decidendi (question of Law) • The ratio decidendi is the heart of a precedent.
  • 5.
    • Is purelyconstitutive in nature and never abrogative. • Create a Law but cannot alter it. • Judges are not at liberty to put their own views. • Judges can fill in the gaps and remove imperfections of the existing laws.
  • 6.
    Four types ofprecedents 1)Declaratory and original precedents • Create law are original precedents • Declaratory of existing laws are declaratory precedents. 2)Persuasive Precedents • judges are under no obligation to follow • But they must take into consideration. • In India, the decision of one High Court are only persuasive precedents in other High Courts. 19
  • 7.
    3) Absolutely Authoritativeprecedents • A precedent is said to be authoritative –the court to which cited is to bound to follow it irrespective of the fact that the court doesn’t agree with that decision. • AAPs , binding character of the precedents are absolute • In India, every court is absolutely bound by the decision of court superior to itself. 4) Conditionally Authoritative Precedents • Is one which though ordinarily binding on the court to which it is cited. • Is liable to be disregarded in certain circumstances Doctrines of Precedent in Tribunals of India • If a Bench of the Tribunal wishes to take a view different from the one taken by the earlier Bench, • Propriety demands that it should place the matter before the president of the Tribunal so that the case is referred to a larger bench
  • 8.
    • The SupremeCourt –1950 • Highest Court, the law declared by it is binding on all courts of the country.—Article 141 • ―law declared‖ means not only the ratio decidendi of a decision but it includes also obiter dictum. • Ratio decidendi(reason of the decision) includes – a concrete decision binding on the parties--- the concrete, practical decision, the force of law. 24 • Obiter dicta • Legal opinion on issues which they are not asked to decide.
  • 9.
    • Ratio decidendiis the general principle of the case • Obiter dicta is what the judge said unwantedly, just by the way. • OD—which does not have any binding authority 25 • Supreme Court is not bound by its own decisions • All courts in Article 141---Other than the Supreme Court. • Supreme Court observed that the Doctrine of Stare Decisis is a very valuable principles of precedent • If departed from it there are extraordinary or special reasons to do so. • In Constitution– does not place any restriction on our power to review our earlier decision.
  • 10.