JOURNAL CLUB
ATTEST-2 TRIAL
ALTEPLASETENECTEPLASE TRIAL EVALUATION
FOR STROKE THROMBOLYSIS
Presenter Moderator
Dr Aviral Shah Dr Vikas Sharma
DrNB Resident, Neurology Additional Director, Neurology
FMRI FMRI
2.
The Lancet Neurology
November2024
Volume 23, Number 11
Pages 1087-1096
JIF : 46.5
5 Year IF : 51.6
Trial conducted in UK
4.
AIM
To compare Tenecteplase(0.25 mg/Kg) with Alteplase
(0.9 mg/Kg) for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke
within 4.5 hours of symptom onset to establish non-
inferiority or superiority
5.
METHODS
STUDY DESIGN
Prospective
Randomised
Parallel group
Open Label
39 UK stroke centres
Jan 25, 2017 to May 30, 2023
INCLUSION CRITERIA
Previously independent adults ≥ 18 years
Acute ischemic stroke
Presenting within 4.5 hours of last well known
6.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Evidence of ICH or non stroke intracranial pathology accounting
for presentation
Stroke within previous 14 days
Thrombolytic therapy within past 14 days
Hypodensity on CT consistent with recent cerebral ischemia
other than presenting event
SBP ≥ 185 or DBP ≥ 110 mmHg or IV pharmacotherapy to
reduce BP to these limits
History s/o SAH
Conditions with high risk of hemorrhage
7.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Hypoglycemia (<2.8 mmol/L) or hyperglycemia (> 22.2 mmol/L)
Seizure at onset
Pregnancy
Inadequate haemostasis
INR > 1.3 if on warfarin
Less than 12 hours from administration of any DOAC
Use of therapeutic dose of LMWH within 48 hours
Any major condition likely to limit survival to day 90
Anticipated unavailability for day 90 follow up
Endovascular thrombectomy permitted when indicated
Initially excluded patients proceeding for EVT – removed as
exclusion criteria in 2019
9.
PROCEDURE
Alteplase- 0.9mg/Kg – 10% bolus followed by 90 % as
infusion over 60 mins (maximum 90mg)
Tenecteplase - 0.25 mg/Kg as iv bolus (maximum 25 mg)
NIHSS - before randomisation , at 22-36 hours after treatment
and at day 5 ( or discharge if earlier) and if clinical worsening
Telephone interview at Day 90 – mRS measured using Rankin
Focused Assessment structured interview
Additional Endpoints
Barthel Index of ADLs
EuroQOL Quality of Life-5 Dimensions 5 Level measure (EQ 5D-5L)
Imaging – CT or MRI before treatment , repeated at 22-36 hours
after treatment and if significant neurological worsening
10.
Outcomes
Primary
o mRSscore distribution at Day 90
Secondary
o Excellent neurological recovery – mRS 0-1
o Independent neurological recovery – mRS0-2
o Early major neurological improvement ( by ≥ 8 points or return to
0-1 NIHSS score at 24 hours)
o Excellent recovery on BI – score 95-100
o Day 90 EQ5D-5L
o Whether thrombectomy done
11.
Safety outcomes
Mortality
sICH (SITS-MOST and ECASS-3)
Radiologically defined PH-2
Any post treatment intracranial bleed
Significant Extracranial hemorrhage- requiring transfusion or Hb
fall > 2 g/L or intraocular )
Additional - Post hoc comparison of reperfusion at first
angiographic run ( in EVT subgroup)
12.
PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS
• Meanage – 70.4 (SD 12.9) years
• Median NIHSS – 7 (IQR 5-13)
• 17% (n 303) – NIHSS > 16
• Median onset to treatment time – 145 min
• 12% (n 219) – underwent EVT
• Median follow up – 94 days
13.
RESULTS
Absolute increasein excellent outcomes 2.03% with TNK – non
inferior but not superior – adjusted OR 1.05
Absolute increase in independent recovery 3.41% with TNK –
adjusted OR 1.15
No interactionwith treatment effect for any outcome seen for
Age group (≤ 80 or > 80 years)
Stroke severity by NIHSS
Onset to treatment time
Thrombectomy undertaken or not
LVO presence
Reperfusion at thrombectomy first angio run (Mtici 2b-3)
8% (n=8) in TNK
4% (n=5) in TPA
17.
Superiority notshown but point estimates for day 90 mRS
recovery favoured TNK
Magnitude of benefit with TNK at 90 day smaller than
previously suggested
Advantages
Wider range of stroke patients across multiple sites
Limitations
Lower proportion of LVO patients (19%) vs other studies ( AcT
33%)
Lower use of EVT (12.4%) vs other studies ( AcT 25%)
18.
ORIGINAL TRIAL
Published: September 2024 in JAMA
Aim : Assess Non inferiority of TNK vs TPA in Chinese AIS
patients within 4.5 hours of symptom onset
Multicentre, active controlled, parallel group , randomized,
open label blinded end point phase 3 study
55 Neurology centres in China
19.
Inclusion
18years or more age
NIHSS 1-25
Symptomatic for at least 30 minutes without significant
improvement
Received IVT within 4.5 hours
If NIHSS <4 – measurable motor deficit required in arm or leg
of at least 1
Thrombectomy patients eligible
ICH excluded by NCCT
20.
Outcomes
Primary– Day 90 mRS of 0 or 1
Secondary
Major neurological improvement at 24 hours (NIHSS 0 or 4
point change from baseline)
mRS 0-2
Distribution of mRS scores
BI atleast 95
Safety outcomes
sICH upto 36 hours – ECASS III
All cause mortality within 90 days
mRS score 5 or 6 on day 90
21.
Results
1346patients – 732 TNK and 736 TPA
Median age 66/ Median NIHSS 6/ 30% Females
TNK was non-inferior for excellent functional outcome
mRS 0-2 – 80.9% TNK vs 79.9% TPA
Major neurologic improvement TNK 48% vs TPA 45%
BI at least 95 – 75.7% TNK vs 73.9% TPA
Mean NIHSS change from baseline -3.70 for TNK vs -3.02 for
TPA
Mortality 4.6% TNK vs 5.8% TPA
mRS 5-6 = 6.8% TNK vs 7.8% TPA
TNK NOT superior to TPA
22.
OTHER TRIALS
TASTE(2024) – Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase for Stroke
Thrombolysis Evaluation
TRACE 2 (2023) – Tenecteplase Reperfusion Therapy in Acute
Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events
AcT (2022)- Alteplase Compared To Tenecteplase
ORIGINAL vs AcT
Baseline severity higher in AcT
Higher sICH rates in AcT
Higher Thrombectomy rates in AcT
Higher excellent mRS in ORIGINAL
23.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ANDMETA-
ANALYSIS
TENECTEPLASE VS ALTEPLASE IN ACUTE ISCHEMIC
STROKE WITHIN 4.5 HOURS
Published in Neurology ( November 2024 )
11 RCTs – 3788 TNK patients vs 3757 TPA patients
TNK associated with higher likelihood of excellent functional
outcome and reduced 90 day disability
Good functional outcome , safety outcomes and mortality at 90 day
similar
26.
TAKE HOME MESSAGE
TNK is non-inferior to TPA for AIS within 4.5 hours
Higher fibrin specificity and longer half life – single iv
bolus dosing
May decrease inter-hospital transfers and improve
workflow for Mechanical Thrombectomy
Avoids infusion interruption risk
Cost efficient
No significantly different safety risk